Reactive postural control (RPC), essential for maintaining balance during daily activities, relies on a complex sensory system integrating visual, vestibular, and proprioceptive inputs. Deficits in RPC can lead to falls, especially in unpredictable environments where sensory inputs are challenged. Traditional rehabilitation often fails to prepare patients adequately for real-world conditions. This study aims to explore the effects of varying instability levels (ILs) and sensory integration strategies (SIS) on RPC by evaluating balance disturbances without applying additional external force. Twenty-five healthy participants (12 men, 13 women, 24.5 ± 6.1 years) performed balance tasks on Abili® platforms with adjustable ILs (0, 1, 2, 3) while altering sensory strategies (Basic, Visual, Proprioception, Vestibular) using the Modified Clinical Test of Sensory Integration and Balance (mCTSIB). RPC efficiency was measured using the 95th percentile confidence interval for chest movement’s ellipsoid volume and average velocity, analyzed with Wilcoxon signed-rank tests and Cliff’s delta effect size. Results showed significant increases in chest movement velocity and volume, particularly with the Vestibular strategy at higher ILs, with a 7176% increase in chest volume from Basic strategy at 0IL to Vestibular strategy at 3IL. Additionally, removing visual input (Visual and Vestibular strategies) had a greater impact on chest movement than increasing instability levels. These findings underscore the significant role of combined platform instability and reduced sensory input on postural control. This study presents a novel method for challenging balance and suggests that sensory integration with variable instability could be valuable in training and rehabilitation, even for healthy individuals.
Read full abstract