Clinical Adjacent Segment Disease Research Articles

Monocentric Retrospective Analysis of Clinical Outcomes, Complications, and Adjacent Segment Disease in 507 Patients Undergoing Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion for Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy

BackgroundDegenerative Cervical Myelopathy (DCM) is a leading cause of non-traumatic spinal cord injury. Surgery aims to arrest neurological decline and improve conditions, but controversies surround risks and benefits in elderly patients, outcomes in mild myelopathy, and the risk of adjacent segment disease (ASD). MethodsRetrospective data of patients who underwent ACDF for DCM in our hospital were collected. Patients were stratified by preoperative mJOA (mild, moderate, severe) and age (Under 70, Over 70). Clinical outcomes, complications, and ASD rate were analyzed. We evaluated the relationship between mJOA recovery rate and the risk of complications and various preoperative parameters. Results507 consecutive patients were included in the study, with a mean follow-up of 43.52 months (12-71). Improvement in all outcome variables was observed in mild, moderate and severe myelopathy categories, with elderly patients showing a lower improvement. Except for age, no other variable correlated with mJOA recovery rate. We observed 45 complications (11.1% of patients), with 14 in the U70 group and 31 in the O70 group (p-value<0.001). Age, Charlson Comorbidity index and ASA score were found to be predictors of complications. Fourteen patients (2.8% of total), mean age 54.2, developed radiological and clinical ASD. Most had cranial-level ASD with Pfirmann grade >= 2 before index surgery. ConclusionsMost myelopathic patients improve after ACDF. Elderly patients show a lower improvement and higher complication rates than younger counterparts. ASD rates are low, and younger patients with preexisting cranial level alterations are more susceptible.

Risk factors of adjacent-segment disease after short-segment fusion in patients with de novo degenerative lumbar scoliosis.

Short-segment fusion (SSF) is an effective surgical option for appropriately selected patients with de novo degenerative lumbar scoliosis (DNDLS). Considering that DNDLS is frequently accompanied by multisegment degeneration and potential instability across the entire lumbar segments, it is inevitable that unhealthy segments remain after SSF, thereby increasing the potential risk of adjacent-segment disease (ASD) occurrence. Therefore, the authors aimed to identify the risk factors for ASD in patients with DNDLS who underwent SSF. This retrospective study included 80 patients with DNDLS (Cobb angle > 10°) who underwent SSF (1 or 2 levels) between December 2010 and July 2018 with a minimum follow-up duration of 5 years. The participants were divided into two groups: ASD and non-ASD. ASD was defined as clinical ASD rather than radiographic ASD. Various patient and operative variables were compared between the groups. Global and regional radiographic parameters (preoperatively and postoperatively) were also compared between the two groups using plain radiography and MRI. Consequently, univariate and multivariate analyses were conducted to identify the risk factors for ASD occurrence. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve was used to calculate the cutoff values. The mean ± SD age was 67.7 ± 7.2 years at the time of SSF, and there were 62 women (77.5%) enrolled in the study. Thirty patients (37.5%) were in the ASD group and 50 patients (62.5%) were in the non-ASD group. The mean time from the surgery to ASD diagnosis was 34.9 ± 28.2 months in ASD group. Thirteen patients required revision surgery at a mean time of 8.8 ± 7.0 months after ASD occurrence. Multivariate logistic regression analysis demonstrated that preoperative disc wedging angle (OR 1.806, 95% CI 1.255-2.598, p = 0.001), presence of facet tropism (defined as ≥ 10° difference between the facet joint angles of the right and left sides) (OR 5.534, 95% CI 1.528-20.040, p = 0.009), and foraminal stenosis ≥ grade 2 (OR 5.935, 95% CI 1.253-28.117, p = 0.025) were significant risk factors for ASD development. The cutoff value of the preoperative disc wedging angle was calculated to be 2.5° using the ROC curve. Preoperative disc wedging angle ≥ 2.5°, presence of facet tropism, and foraminal stenosis ≥ grade 2 were identified as significant risk factors for ASD development after SSF in patients with DNDLS.

Lumbar adjacent segment degeneration after spinal fusion surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Adjacent segment degeneration is among the most recognized long-term complications of lumbar surgery for degenerative spine pathologies with a relevant impact in spine surgical and clinical practice. It is reported a incidence of clinical adjacent segment disease between 5-30% of patients undergoing spinal fusion. We aimed to evaluate the main clinical and surgical risk factors for developing adjacent segment disease. A systematic review and meta-analysis of the pertinent literature was performed, according to PRISMA and PICO guidelines, focusing on clinical and radiological adjacent segment disease. We exclusively included studies reporting demographic and clinical data, and surgical details published from 30 September 2015 to 30 September 2020. The effect of considered risk factors on the presence of adjacent segment disease was explored with a random-effects model. A total of 15 scientific publications, corresponding to 6253 patients, met the inclusion criteria for the qualitative and quantitative analysis. 720 of the patients developed a clinical and/or radiological adjacent syndrome disease, and 473 have been surgically managed. Ten articles qualified for the comparative geographical analysis. Advanced age and obesity are relevant risk factors for developing lumbar adjacent segment degeneration. Our data also reported a higher prevalence of adjacent segment degeneration in Western populations than in Eastern populations. The interbody fusion has a protective role toward lumbar adjacent segment degeneration. This study highlighted multifactorial issues regarding adjacent segment disease: clinical, anatomical, biomechanical, and radiological features. In view of increasing life expectancy and spinal surgery procedures, extensive multicenter studies will be needed to define the correct management of the adjacent segment disease.

Risk Factors for Adjacent Segment Disease Following Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion with Plate Fixation: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Adjacent segment disease (ASD) following anterior cervical discectomy and fusion with plating (ACDF-P) may yield a poor prognosis or reoperation. This review aimed to summarize risk factors for radiographic ASD (RASD) and clinical ASD (CASD) after ACDF-P. Six electronic databases were searched from inception to October 30, 2021. Four reviewers independently screened titles, abstracts, and full-text articles to identify relevant studies. Methodological quality of the included studies was evaluated. Meta-analyses for risk factors were conducted, if possible. Sixteen cohort and 3 case-control studies (3,563 participants) were included. These studies showed low (n = 2), moderate (n = 9), and high (n = 8) risk of bias. One risk factor for RASD was pooled for 2 meta-analyses based on the follow-up period. Four different risk factors for CASD at ≥4 years were pooled for meta-analyses. Limited evidence showed that multi-level fusion, greater asymmetry in total or functional cross-sectional area of the cervical paraspinal muscle, and preoperative degeneration in a greater number of segments were associated with a higher RASD incidence <4 years after ACDF-P. In contrast, no significant risk factors were identified for CASD <4 years after ACDF-P. At ≥4 years after ACDF-P, limited evidence supported that both cephalad and caudal plate-to-disc distances of <5 mm were associated with a higher RASD incidence, and very limited evidence supported that developmental canal stenosis, preoperative RASD, unfused C5-C6 or C6-C7 adjacent segments, use of autogenous bone graft, and spondylosis-related ACDF-P were associated with a higher CASD incidence. Although several risk factors for RASD and CASD development after ACDF-P were identified, the supporting evidence was very limited to limited. Future prospective studies should extend the existing knowledge by more robustly identifying risk factors for RASD and CASD after ACDF-P to inform clinical practice. Prognostic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Dynesys® dynamic stabilization outcomes in degenerative spine surgery.

Dynesys® is a dynamic device used for posterior stabilization of the lumbar spine. The objective of this study was to analyze the clinical and radiological outcomes at a 2-year minimum follow-up. In this retrospective study, patients operated between 2009 and 2016 with Dynesys® stabilization were included. 5 different etiologies were included: disc herniation, lumbar stenosis, revision for adjacent seg- ment disease (ASD), spondylolisthesis, and scoliosis. Clinical and radiological evaluations were performed. Postoperative complications and revisions were recorded. 136 patients were included: 34 for lumbar spinal stenosis, 19 for disc herniation, 29 degenerative spon- dylolisthesis, 41 revisions for ASD, and 13 scoliosis. Mean age was 64.8. Average clinical follow-up was 46 months. Postoperative clinical results showed a mean lumbar VAS of 3.07, a mean radicular VAS of 3.01 and an ODI score of 31.8%. The ASD rate was 16.2%, and overall revision rate was 11.8%. 2 cases (1.5%) of screw loosening were identified. Clinical outcomes, ASD rate and revision rate were more favorable in the spondylolisthesis and disc herniation groups. This study has one of the largest Dynesys® cohort in literature. Spinal dynamic stabilization by Dynesys® presents good long-term clinical and radiological out- comes with a lower rate of complications than pre- viously published cohorts and lumbar fusions. Best indications seem to be degenerative spondylolisthesis.

P53. Clinical risk factors for adjacent segment disease following lumbar spine fusion surgeries: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND CONTEXT Adjacent segment disease (ASD) is a possible complication following lumbar surgeries, particularly lumbar fusion. PURPOSE To investigate the clinical risk factors associated with developing radiological and/or clinical ASD following lumbar fusion. STUDY DESIGN/SETTING Systematic review and meta-analysis. PATIENT SAMPLE Adult patients undergoing lumbar fusion. OUTCOME MEASURES Clinical risk factors associated with the development of ASD. METHODS We performed a comprehensive literature search to find the relevant studies using PubMed, Embase, Medline, Scopus, and the Cochrane library databases from the beginning to December 2019. The titles and abstracts were used for initial screening, followed by a full-text review. The methodological index for non‐randomized studies (MINORS) criteria were used to evaluate the methodological quality of the included studies. A meta-analysis was conducted to calculate the odds ratio (OR) with the 95% confidence interval (CI) for dichotomous variables and mean difference (MD) with 95% CI for continuous variables. Both fixed and random-effects models were used to pool the data according to the observed heterogeneity. RESULTS Thirty-five studies were included in the final qualitative analysis. Twenty-two of these studies were included in the risk factors meta-analyses. The mean quality score of the included studies was 12.4±1.9 (range, 8-16) points, based on the MINORS criteria. The level of evidence was low for many risk factors. Overall, 1,266 (17.2%) patients acquired ASD following lumbar fusion, and 6108 (82.8%) patients did not develop ASD, within a follow-up ranging between 20.5 - 165.6 months. Four clinical variables were found to have statistically significant risk factors for ASD, including higher preoperative body mass index (BMI) (mean difference [MD] = 1.97 kg/m2; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.49, 2.45; P CONCLUSIONS High preoperative BMI, floating fusion, superior facet joint violation, and decompression outside fusion construct are associated with a significant risk of developing ASD in patients undergoing lumbar fusion. FDA DEVICE/DRUG STATUS This abstract does not discuss or include any applicable devices or drugs.

P63. Current incidence of adjacent segment pathology following lumbar fusion versus motion preserving procedures: a systematic review and meta-analysis of recent projections

P63. Current incidence of adjacent segment pathology following lumbar fusion versus motion preserving procedures: a systematic review and meta-analysis of recent projections

Risk factors related to adjacent segment degeneration: retrospective observational cohort study and survivorship analysis of adjacent unfused segments

Object: Adjacent segment disease (ASD) has been described as a frequent complication after a lumbar spinal fusion procedure, though its incidence and the factors related to its appearance are not well established. The radiographic signs that identify ASD in unfused segments may be a consequence of biomechanical changes induced by the fusion procedure. This study sought to analyse the incidence of radiographic changes (radiographic ASD) in all adjacent unfused segments, the clinical changes that require a second procedure (clinical ASD), and the risk factors of their appearance evaluated at different follow-up times.Methods: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of patients fused for degenerative spine disease and instability to analyse ASD risk factors using actuarial estimation, comparison of the Kaplan-Meier survival curves of each variable, and Cox proportional-hazards regression analysis.Results: Among the 263 patients included in the study, radiographic changes were observed in 57.4% and related clinical changes in 20.2%. The univariate analysis showed a higher risk of ASD in patients with smaller post- vs. pre-operative lumbar lordosis (p = .018), diagnosis of lumbar canal stenosis (p = .019), fusion of three or more vs. fewer levels (p = .009) and those fixed with top-loading screws vs. side-connecting screws (p = .001). Cox proportional-hazards regression analysis showed that the use of top-loading pedicle screws and three or more levels of fusion led to a 3- and 2-fold higher risk of degeneration in adjacent unfused segments respectively.Conclusions: Risk of a second surgical procedure due to clinical changes is 3-fold higher in patients with three or more levels of fusion, and 2.5-fold higher in patients intervened with top-loading pedicle screws.

Risk of adjacent-segment disease requiring surgery after short lumbar fusion: results of the French Spine Surgery Society Series.

OBJECTIVE Adjacent-segment disease (ASD) is an increasingly problematic complication following lumbar fusion surgery. The purpose of the current study was to determine the risk of ASD requiring surgical treatment after short lumbar or lumbosacral fusion. Primary spinal disease and surgical factors associated with an increased risk of revision were also investigated. METHODS This was a retrospective cohort study using the French Spine Surgery Society clinical data that included 3338 patients, with an average follow-up duration of 7 years (range 4-10 years). Clinical ASD requiring surgery was the principal judgment criterion; the length of follow-up time and initial spinal disease were also recorded. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was performed. The correlation between primary spinal disease and surgery with an increased risk of revision was investigated. RESULTS During the follow-up period, 186 patients required revision surgery for ASD (5.6%). The predicted risk of ASD requiring revision surgery was 1.7% (95% CI 1.3%-2.2%) at 2 years, 3.8% (95% CI 4.9%-6.7%) at 4 years, 5.7% (95% CI 4.9%-6.7%) at 6 years, and 9% (95% CI 8.7%-10.6%) at 8 years. Initial spinal disease affected the risk of ASD requiring surgery (p = 0.0003). The highest risk was observed for degenerative spondylolisthesis. CONCLUSIONS ASD requiring revision surgery was predicted in 5.6% of patients 7 years after index short lumbar spinal fusion in the French Spine Surgery Society retrospective series. An increased risk of ASD requiring revision surgery associated with initial spinal disease showed the significance of the influence of natural degenerative history on adjacent-segment pathology.

Nonfusion Does Not Prevent Adjacent Segment Disease

Case series. The aim of this study was to determine the relationship between fusion and adjacent segment disease via Dynesys long-term outcomes. Dynesys is a dynamic stabilization system meant to improve symptoms by stabilizing the spine without fusion and avoiding the development of adjacent segment disease. However, few studies have evaluated long-term outcomes. All patients were operated on with Dynesys from 2006 to 2009 by a single surgeon at a single institution. We prospectively collected 18 variables among the following categories: patient characteristics, comorbidities, surgical indications, and OR variables. We analyzed two primary endpoints: solid fusion on X-ray and clinical adjacent segment disease (ASD) both at 5 years. Secondary endpoints were time to fusion, time to ASD, reoperation, Oswestry disability index (ODI), and visual analogue scale (VAS) leg pain. We conducted a multivariate analysis via the random forest method. Mann-Whitney U test and Fisher exact test were then used to qualify relationship between variables. We had 52 patients to review in the database. Eight had preexisting ASD. Mean follow-up was 92 months (median 87 months). Fifteen had ASD (29%) during follow-up at a mean 45 months (Median 35 months). Nine had a solid fusion (17%), 2 of which also had ASD. Mean time to fusion was 65 months (median 71 months). Differences in improvement of ODI (P = 0.005) and VAS leg pain (P = 0.002) were significant favoring patients without ASD. The multivariate analysis revealed four variables associated with ASD: prior ASD (OR 11.3, P = 0.005), neurological deficit (OR 8.5, P = 0.018), revision OR (OR 8.5, P = 0.018), and multilevel degeneration (OR 0.184, P = 0.026). No variable was associated with fusion. Dynesys was associated with a high rate of ASD over long-term follow-up despite maintaining a low fusion rate. Prior ASD was the strongest predictor of progressive ASD. 3.

Does pre-existing L5-S1 degeneration affect outcomes after isolated L4-5 fusion for spondylolisthesis?

BackgroundConcerns have been raised regarding residual symptoms of caudal segment (L5-S1) degeneration that may affect clinical outcomes or require additional surgery after isolated L4-5 fusion, especially if there is pre-existing L5-S1 degeneration. This study aimed to evaluate the L5-S1 segment after minimally invasive lumbar interbody fusion at the L4-5 segment, as well as the influence of pre-existing L5-S1 degeneration on radiologic and clinical outcomes.MethodsThis retrospective study evaluated patients with isthmic spondylolisthesis and degenerative spondylolisthesis who underwent mini-open anterior lumbar interbody fusion with percutaneous pedicle screw fixation (PSF) or minimally invasive transforaminal interbody fusion with PSF at the L4-5 segment. The minimum follow-up period was 7 years, and radiographic evaluations were conducted via magnetic resonance imaging, computed tomography, and plain radiography at the 5-year follow-up. Clinical outcomes were assessed using the Visual Analog Score, Oswestry Disability Index, and surgical satisfaction rate. Patients were divided into two groups, those with and without pre-existing L5-S1 degeneration, and their final outcomes and incidence of radiographic and clinical adjacent segment disease (ASD) were compared.ResultsAmong 70 patients who underwent the procedures at our institution, 12 (17.1%) were lost to follow-up. Therefore, this study evaluated 58 patients, with a mean follow-up period of 9.4 ± 2.1 years. Among these patients, 22 patients had pre-existing L5-S1 degeneration, while 36 patients did not have pre-existing L5-S1 segmental degeneration. There were no significant differences in the clinical outcomes at the final follow-up when the two groups were compared. However, radiographic ASD at L5-S1 occurred in seven patients (12.1%), clinical ASD at L5-S1 occurred in three patients (5.2%), and one patient (1.7%) required surgery. In the group with pre-existing degeneration, L5-S1 degeneration was radiographically accelerated in four patients (18.2%) and clinical ASD developed in one patient (4.5%). In the group without pre-existing degeneration, L5-S1 degeneration was radiographically accelerated in three patients (8.3%) and clinical ASD developed in two patients (5.7%). There were no differences in the incidence of ASD when we compared the two groups.ConclusionsPre-existing L5-S1 degeneration does not affect clinical and radiographical outcomes after isolated L4-5 fusion.

Combined Dynamic and Rigid Multilevel Posterolateral Lumbar Fixation Systems in Prevention of Adjacent Segment Disease

Introduction: The gold standard in the treatment of lumbar degenerative spinal diseases is the posterolateral fusion with rod and screws. Semi-rigid systems were first designed to stabilize the abnormal segment and to unload degenerated discs and facet joints. One commonly observed consequence of fusing spinal motion levels has been adjacent segment disease (ASD). Due to prevention of ASD is a complicated and controversial topic, the aim of this study was to assess the role of combined dynamic and rigid posterolateral fixation systems in prevention of ASD. Patients and Methods: A total of 76 adult patients with various lumbar spine pathologies, treated with posterior fusion and pedicle screw fixation between T12 and sacrum were included in this study. The prevalence of radiological and clinical ASD was measured and the functional outcome of the patients was evaluated using the Oswestry questionnaire. Results: Evidence of radiographic ASD was noted in 6 of the 76 patients (7.9%), of whom one patient was symptomatic (16.67%). The mean preoperative Oswestry score was 27.2 ± 20.7 and the mean postoperative Oswestry score was 15.4 ± 20.3. There was a significant difference between the 2 scores (p=0.027). The mean postoperative lumbar lordosis was -53° ± 2.08 and the pelvic incidence 61° ± 3.12. Related to the complications, 6 patients with superficial wound infections, one patient with deep venous thrombosis (DVT), and one patient with ASD were reported. Discussion: In our study, the very low incidence of ASD is achieved by the mean of preservation of the top facet joint, correction and preservation of coronal and sagittal balance, preservation of motion in the lumbar spine with the use of semi-rigid devices, and early rehabilitation accompanying by the training of the patient regarding to the body balance. Semi-rigid fixation significantly reduces the risk of screw fracture by the absorption of the stress on the interpedicular damper and enhances the bone fusion by maintaining constraints on the cages which remain under a compressive load.

Evaluation of efficacy of a new hybrid fusion device: a randomized, two-centre controlled trial.

BackgroundThe 360° fusion of lumbar segments is a common and well-researched therapy to treat various diseases of the spine. But it changes the biomechanics of the spine and may cause adjacent segment disease (ASD). Among the many techniques developed to avoid this complication, one appears promising. It combines a rigid fusion with a flexible pedicle screw system (hybrid instrumentation, “topping off”). However, its clinical significance is still uncertain due to the lack of conclusive data.Methods/DesignThe study is a randomized, therapy-controlled, two-centre trial conducted in a clinical setting at two university hospitals. If they meet the criteria, outpatients presenting with degenerative disc disease, facet joint arthrosis or spondylolisthesis will be included in the study and randomized into two groups: a control group undergoing conventional fusion surgery (PLIF - posterior lumbar intervertebral fusion), and an intervention group undergoing fusion surgery using a new flexible pedicle screw system (PLIF + “topping off”), which was brought on the market in 2013.Follow-up examination will take place immediately after surgery, after 6 weeks and after 6, 12, 24 and 36 months. An ongoing assessment will be performed every year.Outcome measurements will include quality of life and pain assessments using validated questionnaires (ODI - Ostwestry Disability Index, SF-36™ - Short Form Health Survey 36, COMI - Core Outcome Measure Index). In addition, clinical and radiologic ASD, sagittal balance parameters and duration of work disability will be assessed. Inpatient and 6-month mortality, surgery-related data (e.g., intraoperative complications, blood loss, length of incision, surgical duration), postoperative complications (e.g. implant failure), adverse events, and serious adverse events will be monitored and documented throughout the study.DiscussionNew hybrid “topping off” systems might improve the outcome of lumbar spine fusion. But to date, there is a serious lack of and a great need of convincing data on safety or efficacy, including benefits and harms to the patients, of these systems. Health care providers are particularly interested in such data as these implants are much more expensive than conventional implants. In such a case, randomized clinical trials are the best way to evaluate benefits and risks.Trial registrationNCT01852526

Preoperative Predictable Factors for the Occurrence of Adjacent Segment Degeneration Requiring Second Operation after Spinal Fusion at Isolated L4–L5 Level

Retrospective study. The purpose of this study was to clarify (1) the overall prevalence of radiologic and clinical adjacent segment disease (ASD), (2) the prevalence of radiologic ASD at cranial versus caudal adjacent segments, and (3) preoperative risk factors and preoperative radiologic features associated with radiologic disc degeneration of the cranial and caudal adjacent segments. A total of 154 patients who underwent posterior lumbar interbody fusion and screw-rod fixation at the L4-L5 level were retrospectively evaluated more than 2 years after surgery. We analyzed demographic factors and radiographic features. Special focus was preoperative radiographic features of patients who required additional surgery. These patients were studied to detect risk factors for clinical deterioration. Of 154 patients, 103 (66.8%) showed radiologic degeneration at an adjacent segment after surgery-92 (59.7%) at the cranial adjacent segment and 61 (39.6%) at the caudal adjacent segment-and 10 patients (6.4%) required second operation because of radicular pain as well as severe back pain or spinal instability with back pain and neurologic deficits. Age, body mass index (BMI), and preexisting stenosis at the cranial adjacent segment were identified as important risk factors for clinical ASD requiring second operation. Age, BMI, and preexisting stenosis at the cranial adjacent segment were the most important risk factors for clinical ASD requiring a second operation. Careful consideration is warranted when these risk factors are present.

Comparison of standard fusion with a "topping off" system in lumbar spine surgery: a protocol for a randomized controlled trial

BackgroundFusion of lumbar spine segments is a well-established therapy for many pathologies. The procedure changes the biomechanics of the spine. Initial clinical benefits may be outweighed by ensuing damage to the adjacent segments. Various surgical devices and techniques have been developed to prevent this deterioration. "Topping off" systems combine rigid fusion with a flexible pedicle screw system to prevent adjacent segment disease (ASD). To date, there is no convincing evidence that these devices provide any patient benefits.Methods/DesignThe study is designed as a randomized, therapy-controlled trial in a clinical care setting at a university hospital. Patients presenting to the outpatient clinic with degenerative disc disease or spondylolisthesis will be assessed against study inclusion and exclusion criteria. After randomization, the control group will undergo conventional fusion. The intervention group will undergo fusion with a supplemental flexible pedicle screw system to protect the adjacent segment ("topping off").Follow-up examination will take place immediately after treatment during hospital stay, after 6 weeks, and then after 6, 12, 24 and 36 months. Subsequently, ongoing assessments will be performed annually.Outcome measurements will include quality of life and pain assessments using questionnaires (SF-36™, ODI, COMI). In addition, clinical and radiologic ASD, work-related disability, and duration of work disability will be assessed. Inpatient and 6-month mortality, surgery-related data (e.g., intraoperative complications, blood loss, length of incision, surgical duration), postoperative complications, adverse events, and serious adverse events will be documented and monitored throughout the study. Cost-effectiveness analysis will also be provided.DiscussionNew hybrid systems might improve the outcome of lumbar spine fusion. To date, there is no convincing published data on effectiveness or safety of these topping off systems. High quality data is required to evaluate the benefits and drawbacks of topping off devices. If only because these devices are quite expensive compared to conventional fusion implants, nonessential use should be avoided. In fact, these high costs necessitate efforts by health care providers to evaluate the effects of these implants. Randomized clinical trials are highly recommended to evaluate the benefits or harm to the patient.Trial RegistrationClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01224379

Surgical Outcomes of Degenerative Spondylolisthesis With L5–S1 Disc Degeneration

A retrospective clinical and radiographic study was performed. The purpose of this study was to compare outcomes of patients with degenerative spondylolisthesis and a preexisting degenerative L5-S1 disc treated with a lumbar floating fusion (LFF) versus lumbosacral fusion (LSF). Fusion for treatment of degenerative spondylolisthesis often ends at the L5 level. These patients usually had a preexisting L5-S1 disc degeneration; however, no literature mentions the role of prophylactic LSF in degenerative spondylolisthesis associated with L5-S1 disc degeneration. A total of 107 patients with a minimum 5-year follow-up who had lumbosacral or LFF with pedicle instrumentation for degenerative spondylolisthesis were included. UCLA (University of California, Los Angeles) classification was used to evaluate the radiographic results of the L5-S1 segment. The Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and modified Brodsky's criteria were used to evaluate patients' clinical results. The incidence of adjacent segment disease (ASD) (includes radiographic and clinical ASD) of both ends was recorded. There were no statistically significant differences in sex, age distribution, or amount of follow-up between the LFF and LSF groups. The LSF group had a higher percentage of patients that underwent total L5 laminectomy with loss of L5-S1 posterior ligament integrity (LSF = 92% vs. LFF = 67%, P = 0.019). The higher incidence of cephalic ASD in the LSF group was statistically significant (LSF = 25% vs. LFF = 9.7%, P = 0.049). Although no patient in the LSF group developed L5-S1 ASD, need for L5-S1 segment revision surgery was not prevented with LSF. Clinical outcomes on the basis of the success rate (LFF = 85.5% vs.LSF = 70.8%, P = 0.103) and ODI difference (LFF = 28.97 ± 15.82 vs. LSF = 23.04 ± 10.97, P = 0.109), there were no statistically significant difference between these two groups. Posterior instrumentation with posterolateral LFF for the treatment of degenerative spondylolisthesis with concomitant L5-S1 disc degeneration results in a high percentage of satisfactory clinical results. Extended fusion to the sacrum did not provide a better clinical result. LSF could not reduce the incidence of revision surgery at the L5-S1 segment and involved greater incidence of cephalic ASD.

Disc space distraction is a potent risk factor for adjacent disc disease after PLIF

We reported that excessive disc space distraction caused by insertion of large cages during posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) combined with pedicle screws (PS) induces adjacent segment disease (ASD). Spinous process plate (SPP) is known to allow cage subsidence when used in PLIF, since they cannot share vertical loads. We therefore hypothesize that the incidence of ASD after PLIF with SPP should be lower than that after PLIF with PS due to this loss of disc space distraction. Radiographic ASD is defined as development of spondylolisthesis > 3 mm, decrease in disc height > 3 mm, or intervertebral angle at flexion lesser than -5°. Symptomatic ASD is defined by a decrease of ≥ 4 points in Japanese Orthopedic Association score. One hundred and thirty patients with L4 spondylolisthesis were treated with either PLIF with SPP (n = 45) or PLIF with PS (n = 85) and followed up for a minimum of 2 years (mean, 39.0 months). L4-5 disc space distraction in the SPP group was significantly smaller (0.4 mm) as compared to the PS group (1.8 mm). The incidence of clinical ASD in the SPP group (2%, 1/45) was also significantly less than that in the PS group (15%, 13/85). Multivariate analysis showed that disc space distraction was the most significant risk factor. Among various risk factors for ASD after PLIF, the excessive distraction of disc space proved to be a potent risk factor for ASD.

Anterior Cervical Corpectomy and Fusion Accelerates Degenerative Disease at Adjacent Vertebral Segments

Background Anterior cervical corpectomy provides the most direct and thorough surgical approach for anterior decompression when spinal cord compression is found directly behind the vertebral body. However, anterior cervical fusion has been shown to be associated with the development of new degenerative changes at levels immediately adjacent to the fused segments. The incidence of adjacent segment disease (ASD) following anterior cervical corpectomy has not been widely reported. We set out to determine the incidence of clinical ASD following anterior cervical corpectomy. Methods We retrospectively reviewed all available medical charts and radiographic studies of all cases of anterior cervical corpectomy performed at the Barrow Neurological Institute over a 4-year period with a minimum 24-month follow-up. Factors assessed included the success of arthrodesis, the presence of degenerative changes on serial follow-up radiographs, and the development of new neurological symptoms. Results Seventy-six patients met the criteria for inclusion: 54 had undergone a 1-level corpectomy, 18 underwent a 2-level corpectomy, and 4 underwent a 3- or 4-level corpectomy. Arthrodesis was performed with either allograft or autograft and anterior cervical plating. All patients achieved successful fusion. Follow-up was available for a minimum of 2 years in all cases, with a mean length of 3.6 years. Sixteen patients (21%) eventually developed radiological and clinical evidence of degenerative changes at adjacent levels. In 10 of 11 patients who developed clinical symptoms within 2 years, the changes represented progression of pre-existing, asymptomatic degenerative disease. Five patients developed degenerative changes more than 5 years after surgery; these were all associated with an unrelated new insult to the cervical spine such as trauma. Conclusions Anterior cervical corpectomy with fixation can accelerate degenerative changes identified preoperatively at adjacent, asymptomatic levels of the cervical spine. Level of Evidence Retrospective cohort study (level 2b).

Anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion accelerates degenerative disease at adjacent vertebral segments.

BackgroundAnterior cervical corpectomy provides the most direct and thorough surgical approach for anterior decompression when spinal cord compression is found directly behind the vertebral body. However, anterior cervical fusion has been shown to be associated with the development of new degenerative changes at levels immediately adjacent to the fused segments. Th e incidence of adjacent segment disease (ASD) following anterior cervical corpectomy has not been widely reported. We set out to determine the incidence of clinical ASD following anterior cervical corpectomy.MethodsWe retrospectively reviewed all available medical charts and radiographic studies of all cases of anterior cervical corpectomy performed at the Barrow Neurological Institute over a 4-year period with a minimum 24-month follow-up. Factors assessed included the success of arthrodesis, the presence of degenerative changes on serial follow-up radiographs, and the development of new neurological symptoms.ResultsSeventy-six patients met the criteria for inclusion: 54 had undergone a 1-level corpectomy, 18 underwent a 2-level corpectomy, and 4 underwent a 3- or 4-level corpectomy. Arthrodesis was performed with either allograft or autograft and anterior cervical plating. All patients achieved successful fusion. Follow-up was available for a minimum of 2 years in all cases, with a mean length of 3.6 years. Sixteen patients (21%) eventually developed radiological and clinical evidence of degenerative changes at adjacent levels. In 10 of 11 patients who developed clinical symptoms within 2 years, the changes represented progression of pre-existing, asymptomatic degenerative disease. Five patients developed degenerative changes more than 5 years after surgery; these were all associated with an unrelated new insult to the cervical spine such as trauma.ConclusionsAnterior cervical corpectomy with fixation can accelerate degenerative changes identified preoperatively at adjacent, asymptomatic levels of the cervical spine.Level of EvidenceRetrospective cohort study (level 2b).

Adjacent Segment Disease FollowingLumbar/Thoracolumbar Fusion With Pedicle Screw Instrumentation

Retrospective radiographic outcomes analysis. We had 3 hypotheses: 1) a longer fusion; 2) a more proximal instrumented vertebra, and 3) circumferential fusion versus posterior-only fusion would increase the likelihood of adjacent segment disease (ASD). The literature analyzing risk factors, prevalence, and presentation of patients with ASD is varied and without clear consensus. A total of 188 patients with minimum 5-year follow-up who had lumbar/thoracolumbar fusion with pedicle screw instrumentation for degenerative disorders were included. Radiographic ASD was defined by: 1) development of spondylolisthesis >4 mm, 2) segmental kyphosis >10 degrees , 3) complete collapse of disc space, or 4) more than 2 grades worsening of Weiner classification. Clinical ASD was defined as 1) symptomatic spinal stenosis, 2) intractable back pain, or 3) subsequent sagittal or coronal imbalance. Radiographic ASD occurred in 42.6% (80 of 188) of patients. Patients with radiographic ASD had worse Oswestry scores (20.3 vs. 12.5; P = 0.001) at ultimate follow-up than those without ASD. Clinical ASD developed in 30.3% (57 of 188) of patients. Clinical ASD manifested as spinal stenosis (n = 47), instability-type back pain (n = 5), and sagittal or coronal imbalance (n = 5). Age at surgery over 50 years and length of fusion were significant risk factors for the development of ASD in the lumbar spine. Fusion to L1-L3 proximally increased the risk of ASD when compared with L4 and L5. Circumferential fusion versus posterior fusion was not a significant factor in the development of ASD. Patients over the age of 50 were at higher risk of developing clinical ASD than those 50 years old or younger. Length of fusion was a significant risk factor in the development of ASD in the lumbar spine. Fusion up to L1-L3 increased the risk of ASD when compared with L4 and L5. Circumferential fusion, as opposed to posterolateral fusion, was not a statistically significant risk factor for the development of ASD.