CLIF-C Acute-on-chronic Liver Failure Score Research Articles

Managing Multiorgan Failure in Acute on Chronic Liver Failure.

Acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF) is defined as a clinical syndrome that develops in patients with chronic liver disease characterized by the presence of organ failure and high short-term mortality, although there is still no worldwide consensus on diagnostic criteria. Management of ACLF is mainly based on treatment of "precipitating factors" (the most common are infections, alcohol-associated hepatitis, hepatitis B flare, and bleeding) and support of organ failure, which often requires admission to the intensive care unit. Liver transplantation should be considered in patients with ACLF grades 2 to 3 as a potentially life-saving treatment. When a transplant is not indicated, palliative care should be considered after 3 to 7 days of full organ support in patients with at least four organ failures or a CLIF-C ACLF score of >70. This review summarizes the current knowledge on the management of organ failure in patients with ACLF, focusing on recent advances.

Clinical outcomes and predictors in patients with acute on chronic liver failure in Southern Taiwan

Background/aimsThe study is to analyze the clinical characteristics and identify prognostic factors as well as evaluate predictive models in patients with acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF) from Southern Taiwan. MethodsThe cohort study was conducted using the Chang Gung Research Database. We included patients with ACLF based on the definition provided by the Asian-Pacific Association for the Study of the Liver ACLF Research Consortium (AARC). ResultsA total of 231 patients diagnosed with ACLF were included in this study, out of which 26 patients underwent liver transplantation (LT). The primary cause of ACLF was acute exacerbation of hepatitis B virus (HBV) in 68.4% of cases and followed by severe alcoholic hepatitis (20.8%). Among LT-free patients, the 28-day mortality rate was observed to be 31%. Older age, higher INR and ammonia levels, and the presence of severe hepatic encephalopathy on 3–6 days of treatment were independent predictors of 28-day mortality. The CLIF-C ACLF and COSSH-ACLF scores, evaluated on 3–6 days, demonstrated the highest predictive performance for 28-day mortality. The optimal cut-off values for the CLIF-C ACLF and COSSH-ACLF scores were determined to be 47 and 6.3, respectively. Patients with CLIF-C ACLF score >63 or COSSH-ACLF score >8.1 experienced 100% mortality by day 28. ConclusionsThe CLIF-C ACLF and COSSH-ACLF scores, evaluated within one week after treatment, exhibit strong predictive capabilities for short-term mortality in ACLF patients. These models are valuable tools for guiding timely decision-making, including the consideration of liver transplantation or withdrawal from treatment.

Age added to MELD or ACLF predicts survival in patients with alcohol-associated hepatitis declined for liver transplantation.

Severe alcohol-associated hepatitis (AH) that is nonresponsive to corticosteroids is associated with high mortality, particularly with concomitant acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF). Most patients will not be candidates for liver transplantation (LT) and their outcomes are largely unknown. Our aim was to determine the outcomes of these declined candidates and to derive practical prediction models for transplant-free survival applicable at the time of the waitlist decision. We analyzed a database of patients with severe AH who were hospitalized at a LT center from January 2012 to July 2021, using the National Death Index for those lacking follow-up. Clinical variables were analyzed based on the endpoints of mortality at 30, 60, 90, and 180 days. Logistic and Cox regression analyses were used for model derivation. Over 9.5 years, 206 patients with severe AH were declined for LT, mostly for unfavorable psychosocial profiles, with a mean MELD of 33 (±8), and 61% with ACLF. Over a median follow-up of 521 (17.5-1368) days, 58% (119/206) died at a median of 21 (9-124) days. Of 32 variables, only age added prognostic value to MELD and ACLF grade. CLIF-C ACLF score and 2 new models, MELD-Age and ACLF-Age, had similar predictability (AUROC: 0.73, 0.73, 0.72, respectively), outperforming Lille and Maddrey's (AUROC: 0.63, 0.62). In internal cross-validation, the average AUROC was 0.74. ACLF grade ≥2, MELD score >35, and age >45 years were useful cutoffs for predicting increased 90-day mortality from waitlist decision. Only two patients initially declined for LT for AH subsequently underwent LT (1%). Patients with severe AH declined for LT have high short-term mortality and rare rates of subsequent LT. Age added to MELD or ACLF grade enhances survival prediction at the time of waitlist decision in patients with severe AH declined for LT.

A novel prognostic model to predict mortality in patients with acute-on-chronic liver failure in intensive care unit.

Acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF) implies high short-term mortality rates and usually requires intensive care unit (ICU) admission. Proper prognosis for these patients is crucial for early referral for liver transplantation. The superiority of CLIF-C ACLF score in Asian patients with ACLF admitted to an ICU remains inconclusive when compared to other scoring systems. The purpose of the study is (i) to compare the predictive performance of original MELD, MELD-Lactate, CLIF-C ACLF, CLIF-C ACLF-Lactate, and APACHE-II scores for short-term mortality assessment. (ii) to build and validate a novel scoring system and to compare its predictive performance to that of the original five scores. Two hundred sixty-five consecutive cirrhotic patients with ACLF who were admitted to our ICU were enrolled. The prognostic values for mortality were assessed by ROC analysis. A novel model was developed and internally validated using fivefold cross-validation. Alcohol abuse was identified as the primary etiology of cirrhosis. The AUROC of the five prognostic scores were not significantly superior to each other in predicting 1-month and 3-month mortality. The newly developed prognostic model, incorporating age, alveolar-arterial gradient (A-a gradient), BUN, total bilirubin level, INR, and HE grades, exhibited significantly improved performance in predicting 1-month and 3-month mortality with AUROC of 0.863 and 0.829, respectively, as compared to the original five prognostic scores. The novel ACLF model seems to be superior to the original five scores in predicting short-term mortality in ACLF patients admitted to an ICU. Further rigorous validation is required.

Cirrhotic cardiomyopathy influences clinical outcomes and enhances performance of conventional risk prediction models in acute-on-chronic liver failure with severe sepsis.

Point-of-care echocardiography (POC-Echo) is an essential intensive care hemodynamic monitoring tool. To assess POC-Echo parameters [i.e., cardiac index (CI), systemic vascular resistance index (SVRI) and cirrhotic cardiomyopathy (CCM) markers] and serum biomarkers in predicting circulatory failure (need for vasopressors) and mortality in patients with acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF) having sepsis-induced hypotension. We performed serial POC-Echo within 6 hours (h)of presentation and subsequently at 24, 48 and 72 h in patients with ACLF and sepsis-induced hypotension admitted to our liver intensive care unit. Clinical data, POC-Echo data and serum biomarkers were collected prospectively. We enrolled 120 patients [59% men, aged 49 ± 12 years, 56% alcohol-related disease and median MELDNa of 30 (27-32)], of whom 68 (56.6%) had circulatory failure, with overall mortality of 60%. CCM was present in 52.5%. The predictors of circulatory failure were CI (aHR -1.5; p = 0.021), N-terminal brain natriuretic peptide (aHR -1.1; p = 0.007) and CCM markers; e' septal mitral velocity (aHR -0.5; p = 0.039) and E/e' ratio (aHR -1.2; p = 0.045). Reduction in CI by 20% and SVRI by 15% at 72 h predicted mortality with a sensitivity of 84% and 72%, and specificity 76% and 65%, respectively (p < 0.001). The MELD-CCM model and CLIF-CCM model were computed as MELDNa + 1.815 × E/e' (septal) + 0.402 × e' (septal) and CLIF-C ACLF + 1.815 × E/e' (septal) + 0.402 × e' (septal), respectively, based on multivariable logistic regression. Both scores outperformed MELDNa (z-score = -2.073, p = 0.038) and CLIF-C ACLF score (z score = -2.683, p-value = 0.007), respectively, in predicting 90-day mortality. POC-Echo measurements such as CCM markers (E/e' and e' velocity) and change in CI reliably predict circulatory failure and mortality in ACLF with severe sepsis. CCM markers significantly enhanced the CLIF-C ACLF and MELDNa predictive performance.

Clinical Profile and Prognostic Markers of Acute on Chronic Liver Failure (ACLF): A Single-center Experience from East India

The aim of the study was to study the clinical profile of acute on chronic liver failure (ACLF) and establish Cell-free DNA (Cf DNA) as a predictor of the outcome of ACLF. In this prospective study, those patients who fulfilled EASL criteria were included. Cf DNAwas estimated in 30 patients and compared with the CLIF-C ACLF score. The median age of 132 consecutive ACLF patients was 40 years. The most common acute insult were sepsis (30.3%) and alcohol (22%). While alcohol (35.6%) and chronic HBV (14.3%) were the most common etiologies of cirrhosis. The overall mortality was 45.5% and 71.2% at 28 days and 90 days, respectively. Multiple regression analysis using the Cox proportional hazard model showed that heart rate (HR 1.06, 95% CI 1.04-1.08P= 0.001), lung failure (HR 2.82, 95% CI 1.24-6.44, P= 0.02), and cell-free DNA (HR 2.70, 95% CI 1.17-6.24, P=0.02) were independent predictors of mortality When Cf DNA was used to predict 28-daymortality, Cf DNA was found to have a higher AUC (AUROC 0.84, 95% CI 0.70-0.98, P= 0.001) than the CLIF-C-ACLF score (AUROC 0.81, 95% 0.66-0.97, P= 0.003). However, when 90-daymortality was compared, CLIF-C-ACLF score had a higher area under the curve (AUROC 0.93, 95% CI 0.83-1.00, P= 0.0001) than Cf DNA (AUROC 0.89, 95% CI 0.77-1.00, P= 0.0001). Alcohol and sepsis remain the most common causes of acute insult. Cf DNA is a better predictor of 28-daymortality, whereas CLIF-C ACLF is more accurate to predict 90-daymortality.

Intravenous BCAA Infusion Does Not Lead to a Sustained Recovery From Overt HE in ACLF – An Open Label Randomized Clinical Trial

Background–Hepatic encephalopathy(HE) in acute-on-chronic liver failure(ACLF) is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. We conducted a prospective, randomized controlled clinical trial to study efficacy of intravenous branched chain amino acids(IV-BCAA) with lactulose versus lactulose alone for improvement in HE at 24h, day 3 & day 7. Primary outcome was improvement in encephalopathy by ≥ 1 grade at 72 hours.Patients and Methods–EASL defined ACLF patients with overt HE were assessed and randomized into experimental arm (IV-BCAA - 500mL/day for 3 days + Lactulose; n=39) and comparator arm (Lactulose alone; n=37). Six patients developed COVID-19 after randomization & were excluded (4-experimental arm & 2-comparator arm).Results–Of 222 screened patients, 70 (35 in each arm) were included in analysis. Baseline characteristics including HE grade (2.9 ± 0.7 vs 2.8 ± 0.7;P = 0.86) and CLIF-C ACLF score (54.2 ± 5.6 vs 54.8 ± 5.7;P = 0.65) were similar. Overall survival was 40% at 28 days (48.5% vs 31.4%;P=0.14). Improvement in HESA by ≥1 grade at 24h occurred in 14 patients (40%) in BCAA arm and 6 patients (17.1%) in control group (P=0.03) which translated to shorter ICU stay. Median change in HESA at 24h was more in BCAA arm than control arm(P=0.006) which was not sustained at day 3 or 7. Ammonia levels did not correlate with grade of HE (Spearman’s correlation coefficient(ρ) = - 0.0843;P=0.29).ConclusionIntravenous BCAA does not lead to a sustained improvement in HE grade in ACLF.Trial registration noNCT04238416 (clinicaltrials.gov)

The Ratio of von Willebrand Factor Antigen to ADAMTS13 Activity: Usefulness as a Prognostic Biomarker in Acute-on-Chronic Liver Failure

Acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF) has a high risk of short-term mortality. A disintegrin-like and metalloproteinase with thrombospondin type-1 motifs 13 (ADAMTS13) is a metalloproteinase that specifically cleaves multimeric von Willebrand factor (VWF). Imbalance between ADAMTS13 and VWF is associated with portal hypertension, which induces ACLF development. A previous study reported that ADAMTS13 activity (ADAMTS13:AC) and VWF antigen (VWF:Ag) are predictive biomarkers of ACLF development in patients with cirrhosis. This study investigated the changes in ADAMTS13:AC and VWF:Ag levels from before to after the development of ACLF to determine their usefulness as a prognostic biomarker in patients with ACLF. In total, 101 patients with cirrhosis were enrolled in this study. The level of ADAMTS13:AC and VWF:Ag was determined by an enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Cox proportional hazard regression analysis was conducted to determine independent prognostic factors for patients with liver cirrhosis in the post-ACLF group. ADAMTS13:AC levels gradually decreased in the order of non-ACLF group, pre-ACLF group, and finally post-ACLF group. VWF:Ag and the ratio of VWF:Ag to ADAMTS13:AC (VWF:Ag/ADAMTS13:AC) levels gradually increased in the order of non-ACLF group, pre-ACLF group, followed by post-ACLF group. VWF:Ag/ADAMTS13:AC and CLIF-C ACLF scores were associated with prognosis in the post-ACLF group in multivariate analysis. The cumulative survival of the post-ACLF group was significantly lower for patients with high VWF:Ag/ADAMTS13:AC (>9) compared with those with low VWF:Ag/ADAMTS13:AC (≤9) (HR: 10.72, 95% confidence interval: 1.39-82.78, p < 0.05). The VWF:Ag/ADAMTS13:AC increased according to the progression of ACLF in patients with cirrhosis and predicted prognosis in patients with cirrhosis with ACLF.

CLIF-SOFA and CLIF-C scores for the prognostication of acute-on-chronic liver failure and acute decompensation of cirrhosis: A systematic review

Acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF) is a syndrome characterized by decompensation in individuals with chronic liver disease, generally secondary to one or more extra-hepatic organ failures, implying an elevated mortality rate. Acute decompensation (AD) is the term used for one or more significant consequences of liver disease in a short time and is the most common reason for hospital admission in cirrhotic patients. The European Association for the Study of Liver-Chronic-Liver Failure (EASL-CLIF) Group modified the intensive care Sequential Organ Failure Assessment score into CLIF-SOFA, which detects the presence of ACLF in patients with or without AD, classifying it into three grades. To investigate the role of the EASL-CLIF definition for ACLF and the ability of CLIF-SOFA, CLIF-C ACLF, and CLIF-C AD scores for prognosticating ACLF or AD. This study is a literature review using a standardized search method, conducted using the steps following the guidelines for reporting systematic reviews set out by the PRISMA statement. For specific keywords, relevant articles were found by searching PubMed, ScienceDirect, and BioMed Central-BMC. The databases were searched using the search terms by one reviewer, and a list of potentially eligible studies was generated based on the titles and abstracts screened. The data were then extracted and assessed on the basis of the Reference Citation Analysis (https://www.referencecitationanalysis.com/). Most of the included studies used the EASL-CLIF definition for ACLF to identify cirrhotic patients with a significant risk of short-term mortality. The primary outcome in all reviewed studies was mortality. Most of the study findings were based on an area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) analysis, which revealed that CLIF-SOFA, CLIF-C ACLF, and CLIF-C AD scores were preferable to other models predicting 28-d mortality. Their AUROC scores were higher and able to predict all-cause mortality at 90, 180, and 365 d. A total of 50 articles were included in this study, which found that the CLIF-SOFA, CLIF-C ACLF and CLIF-C AD scores in more than half of the articles were able to predict short-term and long-term mortality in patients with either ACLF or AD. CLIF-SOFA score surpasses other models in predicting mortality in ACLF patients, especially in the short-term. CLIF-SOFA, CLIF-C ACLF, and CLIF-C AD are accurate short-term and long-term mortality prognosticating scores.

Five-year all-cause mortality in critically ill liver transplant patients with coronary artery disease: analysis of acute-on chronic liver failure

Patients with acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF) are critically ill and have high waiting-list mortality. Although studies demonstrated that appropriately treated coronary artery disease (CAD) should not be regarded as a contraindication to liver transplant (LT), data regarding long-term outcomes in critically ill liver LT recipients are lacking. The aim of this study was to compare the rates of all-cause death at 5 years following LT in patients with ACLF with or without CAD. Between 2010 and 2020, we evaluated 921 consecutive LT patients (MELD score, 32 ± 9) and ACLF classified by CLIF-C ACLF score. Up to 5-year all-cause death according to the CAD status was examined. CAD was defined as a preoperative history of coronary artery bypass graft or a percutaneous intervention and old myocardial infarction. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was used. Up to 5 years, 212 (23.0%) of all ACLF patients (n = 921) in whom 17 (29.3%) of 58 CAD patients died. In patients with CAD (6.3%, 58/921), the Kaplan-Meier cumulative mortality rate at 5 years was numerically higher but was not statistically significant when compared with those without CAD (32.9% vs. 23.5%, log-rank, P = 0.25). In subgr oup analysis, there were comparable risks of cumulative mortalities at 5 years across the stratification of ACLF grade 1, 2, and 3 (log-rank P = 0.062, P = 0.72, and P = 0.999, respectively). All-cause mortality is high in patients with ACLF after LT but is not related to the presence of revascularized or treated CAD, across the stratification of ACLF grades.

Current pathophysiological concepts of acute decompensation in patients with liver cirrhosis and prognostic scores in different stages of disease

Acute decompensation and acute-on chronic liver failure (ACLF) are associated with a significant reduced prognosis. Previously, the pathophysiological concept of acute decompensation was mainly based on the peripheral vasodilatation hypothesis. However, during the last years, systemic inflammation was recognized as a major driver for decompensation of liver cirrhosis and ACLF. Further, it has been shown that systemic inflammation is associated with the clinical course and the prognosis of the patients. Inflammation also affects the function of extrahepatic organs and therefore leads to the development of an inflammatory cirrhotic multi-organ syndrome. The importance of systemic inflammation in the context of decompensated liver cirrhosis is also transferred to new clinical scores such as the CLIF-C AD and CLIF-C ACLF score. In this article, we provide an overview of the new systemic inflammation hypothesis of decompensated cirrhosis and also discuss current clinical scores for prognostication in different stages of liver cirrhosis.

From the Editor’s desk…

From the Editor’s desk…

Acute-on-chronic liver failure: Where do we stand?

Acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF) is defined by the rapid development of organ(s) failure(s) associated with high rates of early (28-day) mortality in patients with cirrhosis. ACLF has been categorized into three grades of increasing severity according to the nature and number of organ failures. In patients with grade 3 ACLF, 28-day mortality is >70%. While the definition of ACLF has been endorsed by European scientific societies, North American and Asian Pacific associations have proposed alternative definitions. A prognostic score called the CLIF-C ACLF score provides a more precise assessment of the prognosis of patients with ACLF. Although bacterial infections and variceal bleeding are common precipitating factors, no precipitating factor can be identified in almost 60% of patients with ACLF. There is increasing evidence that cirrhosis is a condition characterized by a systemic inflammatory state and occult infections or translocation of bacteria or bacterial products from the lumen of the GUT to the systemic circulation which could play a role in the development of ACLF. Simple and readily available variables to predict the occurrence of ACLF in patients with cirrhosis have been identified and high-risk patients need careful management. Whether prolonged administration of statins, rifaximin or albumin can prevent ACLF requires further study. Patients with organ(s) failure(s) may needed to be admitted to the ICU and there should be no hesitation in admitting patients with cirrhosis to the ICU. No benefit to survival was observed with albumin dialysis and rescue transplantation is the best option in the most severe patients. One-year post-transplant survival rates exceeding 70%-75% have been reported, including in patients with grade 3 ACLF but these patients were highly selected. Criteria have been proposed to define futile transplantation (too ill to be transplanted), but these criteria need to be refined to include age, comorbidities and frailty in addition to markers of disease severity.

Evaluation of prognostic value of neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio in patients with acute-on-chronic liver failure or severe liver injury from chronic HBV infection.

Acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF) is associated with bacterial infection and poor outcome. Neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) is used to assess bacterial infection and immune dysfunction in numerous diseases. We aimed to evaluate NLR as a prognostic biomarker and to explore its combination with accepted prognostic models in ACLF patients. This retrospective study included patients with ACLF or severe liver injury from chronic HBV infection admitted to three tertiary academic hospitals in China from 2013 to 2019. Baseline NLR was correlated with ACLF grade, bacterial infection, survival and accepted ACLF scores. Baseline NLR values were significantly increased in nonsurvivors and patients with bacterial infection at or after admission and were unaffected by cirrhotic status in 412 transplant-free patients included in three cohorts. Compared with accepted scores, NLR showed moderate accuracy in predicting 28-day mortality and high accuracy in predicting 90-day mortality. Three levels of mortality risk were graded on the basis of NLR values (<3.10, 3.10-4.79 and >4.79), and NLR >4.79 was associated with 53.2-60.0% 28-day and 75.0-80.0% 90-day mortality in these cohorts. Multivariate analyses indicated that NLR retained statistical significance independently of CLIF consortium organ failure score (CLIF-C OFs). NLR-based CLIF-C ACLF score was primarily developed and showed excellent performance in predicting 28/90-day mortality. NLR is a dependable biomarker for bacterial infection assessment and short-term mortality prediction in ACLF patients and can be used jointly with CLIF-C OFs to improve the accuracy of mortality prediction in patients with the disease. NLR-based CLIF-C ACLF model needs further validation.

Applicability and safety of discontinuous ADVanced Organ Support (ADVOS) in the treatment of patients with acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF) outside of intensive care

ADVanced Organ Support (ADVOS) is a novel type of extracorporeal albumin dialysis and holds promise to sustain liver function and recovery of patients with acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF). Previously, ADVOS was tested as continuous treatment for intensive care patients with liver failure. Data related to the applicability and safety as discontinuous treatment outside of ICU is not available. Evaluation of ADVOS as discontinuous treatment for patients with ACLF outside intensive care unit and comparison with a matched historic cohort. In this retrospective study, 26 patients with ACLF and the indication for renal replacement therapy related to HRS-AKI were included. Majority of patients were male (65%) with alcoholic cirrhosis in 88% and infections as a trigger of ACLF in 96%. Liver function was severely compromised reflected by high median MELD and CLIF-C ACLF scores of 37 (IQR 32;40) and 56.5 (IQR 51;60), respectively. Patients were treated discontinuously with ADVOS over a median time of 12 days (IQR 8.25;17) and received 8 (IQR 4.25;9.75) treatment cycles on average. No treatment related adverse events were recorded, and safety laboratory parameters remained constant during the observation time. After 16 h cumulative dialysis therapy, ADVOS significantly reduced protein-bound bilirubin (14%), creatinine (11.8%) and blood urea nitrogen (BUN, 33%). Using a matched cohort with ACLF treated with hemodialysis, ADVOS achieved a stronger decrease in bilirubin (p = 0.01), while detoxification of water-soluble catabolites' including creatinine and BUN was comparable. The 28-days mortality in the ADVOS group was 56% (14/26) and was not inferior to predicted survival (predicted median 28-days mortality was 44%, IQR 30; 59). Discontinuous ADVOS treatment was safe and effective in patients with ACLF outside intensive care and outperformed hemodialysis in reducing protein-bound metabolites.

Comparing CLIF-C ACLF, CLIF-C ACLFlactate, and CLIF-C ACLF-D Prognostic Scores in Acute-on-Chronic Liver Failure Patients by a Single-Center ICU Experience.

Patients with liver cirrhosis have a higher risk of developing acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF). Poor prognosis with a high rate of short-term mortality leads to limited opportunities for further liver transplantation. Thus, precise prognostic evaluation of patients with ACLF is necessary before transplant surgery. In this study, a total of one hundred and thirty-five patients with ACLF admitted to the hepato-gastroenterologic intensive care unit (ICU) for intensive monitoring and treatment at Chang-Gung Memorial Hospital (CGMH, Linkou, Taiwan) were screened from November 2012 to April 2015 and tracked until April 2017. Three new prognostic scores of ACLF, including CLIF-C ACLF (Chronic Liver Failure Consortium Acute-on-chronic Liver Failure score), CLIF-C ACLF-D (CLIF-C ACLF Development score), and CLLF-C ACLFlactate (lactate-adjusted CLIF-C ACLF score) were compared. The primary outcome considered was overall mortality. Mortality predictions at 28, 90, 180, and 365 days were also calculated. By area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) analysis, the CLIF-C ACLF and CLIF-C ACLF-D scores were superior to CLIF-C ACLFlactate scores in predicting 28-day mortality. The CLIF-C ACLF-D score had the highest AUROC in predicting overall mortality as well as at 90, 180, and 365 days. In conclusion, our study demonstrates that CLIF-C ACLF and CLIF-C ACLF-D scores are significant predictors of outcome in critical patients with liver cirrhosis and ACLF. The CLIF-C ACLF-D score may have a superior predictive power for the prediction of 3-month, 6-month, and one-year mortality.

Characteristics and outcomes of acute-on-chronic liver failure patients with or without cirrhosis using two criteria

The aim of the study was to identify the characteristics and outcomes in acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF) patients with or without cirrhosis using two criteria. Patients with acute deterioration of chronic hepatic disease or acute decompensation of cirrhosis were included retrospectively from April 10, 2016 to April 10, 2019. European Association for the Study of the Liver-chronic liver failure (EASL-CLIF) criterion except for consideration of cirrhosis and Chinese Group on the Study of Severe Hepatitis B (COSSH) criterion were used. Clinical features, laboratory data and survival curves were compared between the ACLF patients with and without cirrhosis. A total of 799 patients were included. Among them, 328 had COSSH and EASL ACLF, 197 had COSSH alone, and 104 had EASL alone. There were 11.6% more ACLF with COSSH criterion. Furthermore, EASL ACLF patients with non-cirrhosis vs. cirrhosis had different laboratory characteristics: ALT (423 vs. 154, p < 0.001), AST (303 vs. 157, p < 0.001), γ-GT (86 vs. 75, p < 0.01), and INR (2.7 vs. 2.6, p < 0.001) were significantly higher but creatinine (71 vs. 77, p < 0.01) were significantly lower; but importantly there was no statistical changes between non-cirrhosis and cirrhosis in EASL ACLF patients on 28-day (p = 0.398) and 90-day (p = 0.376) survival curves. However, 90-day (p = 0.030) survival curve was different between non-cirrhosis and cirrhosis in COSSH ACLF patients. COSSH ACLF score (auROC = 0.778 or 0.792, 95%CI 0.706–0.839 or 0.721–0.851) displayed the better prognostic ability for EASL ACLF patients with non-cirrhosis, but CLIF-C ACLF score (auROC = 0.757 or 0.796, 95%CI 0.701–0.807 or 0.743–0.843) still was the best prognostic scoring system in EASL ACLF patients with cirrhosis. In conclusions, EASL definition exhibited better performance on homogeneous identification of ACLF regardless of cirrhosis or non-cirrhosis. And COSSH ACLF score displayed the better prognostic ability for EASL ACLF patients without cirrhosis.

Comparison of CLIF-C ACLF Score and MELD Score in Predicting ICU Mortality in Patients with Acute-On-Chronic Liver Failure.

IntroductionAcute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF) is a serious complication of liver cirrhosis which presents with hepatic and/or extrahepatic organ failure and often needs admission to an Intensive Care Unit (ICU). This condition typically needs organ support and carries a high mortality rate. ICU care may not benefit these patients. There are many scores to assess prognosis in these patients, such as the Model for End-stage Liver Disease (MELD) score, the MELD score refined to take into account serum sodium level (MELD-Na), the chronic liver failure organ failure (CLIF-OF) score, the CLIF Consortium acute-on-chronic liver failure (CLIF-C ACLF) score and the Child-Turcotte-Pugh classification. This study was conducted to compare CLIF-C ACLF and MELD scores for selecting patients at risk of high mortality, as ICU care to these patients in the absence of liver transplantation may be of no value.MethodsThe data of 75 patients admitted to the ICU of Shifa International Hospital in Islamabad were prospectively analyzed. CLIF-C ACLF and MELD scores were calculated at admission and then at 24 and 48 hours after the ICU stay. Data were analyzed with the assistance of SPSS. Mortality was the primary outcome.ResultsComparison of both scores showed that a CLIF-C ACLF score ≥ 70 at 48 hours predicts mortality more accurately, with an area under receiver operating curve (AUROC) of 0.643 (confidence interval [CI] 95% 0.505-0.781; p=0.046) which was significantly higher than MELD scores of 30,40 and 50 at 48 hours. Organ failure and the need for supportive care were strong predictors of mortality (p= < 0.05).ConclusionWe concluded that a CLIF-C ACLF score ≥ 70 at 48 hours and organ failure are better predictors of mortality and that ICU care in these patients does not benefit them. Definitive therapy in the form of liver transplantation may have a promising role, if considered early.

Acute-on-chronic liver failure: a single-centre experience.

Aim of the studyWe set out to determine the applicability of acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF) diagnostic criteria and characteristics of thus defined ACLF sub-cohorts in a real-life clinical context.Material and methodsRetrospective charts’ analysis of consecutive patients hospitalized with decompensated liver disease. Inclusion criteria: acute decompensation, informed consent. Exclusion criteria: malignancy. Diagnostic tools: 1st phase – CLIF-SOFA score calculated manually; 2nd phase – CLIF-C ACLF score calculated at www.efclif.com.ResultsOf 432 hospitalized patients aged 52 years, 41% were female, with MELD 20, 32% patients had acute decompensation (AD); main triggers were alcoholic hepatitis (38%), infections (26%), and variceal bleeding (23%). Of patients with AD, ACLF grades 0-3 was present in 64%, 19%, 13%, and 4%, respectively. In hospital mortality according to final AD/ACLF grade in ACLF 0-3 was 7.5%, 42%, 47%, and 80%, respectively (p < 0.0001).ConclusionsDiagnosing ACLF is nowadays easy; it helps to stratify patients at admission, and refine risk stratification at day 7. The main trigger of AD/ACLF in this region is alcohol. Currently, there are no ACLF-specific treatments; however, timely intensive supportive care can influence the prognosis. Even though still elusive and controversial, the ACLF concept can help systematize management of patients admitted with acute decompensation of advanced chronic liver disease.

1119 Assessment of Utility of Prognostic Models for Predicting Short-Term Mortality of Patients With Acute-on-Chronic Liver Failure

INTRODUCTION: Acute-on-chronic liver failure (ACLF) is a clinical syndrome associated with high short-term mortality. Numerous models have been proposed to predict outcomes in ACLF patients, including novel ones by Asian Pacific Association for the Study of the Liver (APASL) ACLF Research Consortium (AARC), but their utility in a heterogeneous population of ACLF patients remains inconclusive. The study aims to assess the performance of established and newer models for predicting mortality of ACLF patients. METHODS: A retrospective study of 96 patients fulfilling either APASL or European Association for the Study of the Liver (EASL) criteria for ACLF admitted to a tertiary hospital in Singapore between 2004 and 2018 was performed. Child-Turcotte-Pugh (CTP) score, Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD)-Na, Chronic Liver Failure Consortium (CLIF)-SOFA, CLIF-C ACLF and AARC prognostic scores (MELD-lactate, AARC-ACLF) were calculated on days 1, 4, 7 of hospital admission and days 1, 4 of ICU admission. Outcomes assessed were survival to discharge without transplant, 30-day survival and 90-day survival. The scores were evaluated by measuring area under receiver operating characteristic (AUROC) curve at each time point and compared. RESULTS: 28 patients (29.2%) survived to discharge without transplant, 21 patients (21.9%) underwent urgent transplant and 47 patients (49%) died before discharge. 30-day transplant-free survival was 21.9% and 90-day survival was 19.8%. CTP, MELD-Na, MELD-lactate, CLIF-C ACLF and AARC-ACLF scores had high accuracy in predicting hospital mortality on day 4 admission (CTP D1 AUROC 0.642, D4 0.715; MELD-Na D1 0.607, D4 0.721; MELD-lactate D1 0.664, D4 0.861; CLIF-C ACLF D1 0.559, D4 0.697; AARC-ACLF D1 0.571, D4 0.747). CTP, MELD-Na and MELD-lactate scores also had good predictive utility on day 7 admission (CTP D7 0.684; MELD-Na 0.67; MELD-lactate 0.848). This held true regardless of whether APASL or EASL criteria was applied. In addition, the sequential change in CLIF-SOFA and CLIF-C ACLF scores from day 1 to day 4 was significantly associated with need for urgent transplant or death before discharge. CONCLUSION: CTP, MELD-Na and MELD-lactate scores are superior at prognosticating outcomes on day 4 and 7 of admission in our multi-ethnic Asian population. The trend of CLIF-SOFA and CLIF-C ACLF scores from day 1 to day 4 of admission may also contribute valuable information to our assessment of ACLF patients.