Client Working Alliance Research Articles

Comparison of the Working Alliance in Blended Cognitive Behavioral Therapy and Treatment as Usual for Depression in Europe: Secondary Data Analysis of the E-COMPARED Randomized Controlled Trial.

Increasing interest has centered on the psychotherapeutic working alliance as a means of understanding clinical change in digital mental health interventions in recent years. However, little is understood about how and to what extent a digital mental health program can have an impact on the working alliance and clinical outcomes in a blended (therapist plus digital program) cognitive behavioral therapy (bCBT) intervention for depression. This study aimed to test the difference in working alliance scores between bCBT and treatment as usual (TAU), examine the association between working alliance and depression severity scores in both arms, and test for an interaction between system usability and working alliance with regard to the association between working alliance and depression scores in bCBT at 3-month assessments. We conducted a secondary data analysis of the E-COMPARED (European Comparative Effectiveness Research on Blended Depression Treatment versus Treatment-as-usual) trial, which compared bCBT with TAU across 9 European countries. Data were collected in primary care and specialized services between April 2015 and December 2017. Eligible participants aged 18 years or older and diagnosed with major depressive disorder were randomized to either bCBT (n=476) or TAU (n=467). bCBT consisted of 6-20 sessions of bCBT (involving face-to-face sessions with a therapist and an internet-based program). TAU consisted of usual care for depression. The main outcomes were scores of the working alliance (Working Alliance Inventory-Short Revised-Client [WAI-SR-C]) and depressive symptoms (Patient Health Questionnaire-9 [PHQ-9]) at 3 months after randomization. Other variables included system usability scores (System Usability Scale-Client [SUS-C]) at 3 months and baseline demographic information. Data from baseline and 3-month assessments were analyzed using linear regression models that adjusted for a set of baseline variables. Of the 945 included participants, 644 (68.2%) were female, and the mean age was 38.96 years (IQR 38). bCBT was associated with higher composite WAI-SR-C scores compared to TAU (B=5.67, 95% CI 4.48-6.86).There was an inverse association between WAI-SR-C and PHQ-9 in bCBT (B=-0.12, 95% CI -0.17 to -0.06) and TAU (B=-0.06, 95% CI -0.11 to -0.02), in which as WAI-SR-C scores increased, PHQ-9 scores decreased. Finally, there was a significant interaction between SUS-C and WAI-SR-C with regard to an inverse association between higher WAI-SR-C scores and lower PHQ-9 scores in bCBT (b=-0.030, 95% CI -0.05 to -0.01; P=.005). To our knowledge, this is the first study to show that bCBT may enhance the client working alliance when compared to evidence-based routine care for depression that services reported offering. The working alliance in bCBT was also associated with clinical improvements that appear to be enhanced by good program usability. Our findings add further weight to the view that the addition of internet-delivered CBT to face-to-face CBT may positively augment experiences of the working alliance. ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02542891, https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT02542891; German Clinical Trials Register DRKS00006866, https://drks.de/search/en/trial/DRKS00006866; Netherlands Trials Register NTR4962, https://www.onderzoekmetmensen.nl/en/trial/25452; ClinicalTrials.Gov NCT02389660, https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT02389660; ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02361684, https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT02361684; ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02449447, https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT02449447; ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02410616, https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT02410616; ISRCTN Registry ISRCTN12388725, https://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN12388725?q=ISRCTN12388725&filters=&sort=&offset=1&totalResults=1&page=1&pageSize=10; ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02796573, https://classic.clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02796573. RR2-10.1186/s13063-016-1511-1.

Examining therapist estimation of client working alliance and client symptom outcome using truth and bias model and response surface analysis

Objective The aims of this study were to investigate the congruence and discrepancy between Chinese therapist trainees’ estimated client working alliance (WA) and their clients’ actual WA rating, and how the congruence and discrepancy predicted client symptom outcome. Methods Participants were 211 beginning therapist trainees and 1216 clients. Data from their 6888 sessions were analyzed using Truth and Bias Model and Response Surface Model. Results and Conclusions (i) Chinese trainees’ estimation of client WA was on average significantly lower than actual client WA. (ii) At the between-person level, whether the trainee generally over- or underestimated client WA was not related to the client's initial symptom level or symptom improvement rate. (iii) At the within-person between-session level, a session where a trainee accurately perceived high client WA, compared to a session where the trainee accurately perceived low client WA, was followed by greater client symptom relief before the next session. In the case of estimation bias, a session where the trainee underestimated client WA was followed by greater client symptom reduction in the next session, rather than the other way around when the trainee overestimated client WA. Implications on therapist training were discussed.

Working alliance after transferring from one therapist to another in a training clinic: Influence of therapist attachment style.

This study investigated how client working alliance changed after transferring from one therapist to another: (a) When pre- and post-transfer therapists' attachment anxiety/avoidance were congruently higher or lower and (b) when the pretransfer therapists' attachment anxiety/avoidance were more or less discrepant from the posttransfer therapists. A Tau-U analysis and a multilevel polynomial regression and response surface analysis were used to analyze longitudinal data about 23 transferred clients in open-ended psychodynamic psychotherapy with doctoral-level therapist trainees (n = 29). When first and second therapists' attachment anxiety/avoidance levels were congruent, the higher the two therapists' attachment anxiety and avoidance levels were, the greater was the decrement in clients' ratings of working alliance after transfers. When first and second therapists' attachment anxiety/avoidance levels were discrepant from each other, the more the first and second therapists' attachment were different from each other in terms of anxiety, the greater decrement in clients' ratings of working alliance there was after transfers. Meanwhile, the more the two therapists' attachment avoidance levels were different from each other, the less decrement in clients' ratings of working alliance there was after transfers. Therefore, the attachment orientations of the pre- and post-transfer therapists combined to influence client working alliance after transfers. Limitations and implications of the present research are discussed. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).

A strong alliance is not enough: Item-level variation in an alliance measure moderates the alliance strength and client outcome relationship.

[Retraction notice: A retraction for this article was reported in Vol 70(4) of Journal of Counseling Psychology (see record 2023-89440-002). The following article (https://doi .org/10.1037/cou0000629) is being retracted. This retraction is at the request of coauthors Kivlighan and Hill after the results of an investigation by the University of Maryland Institutional Review Board (IRB). The IRB found that the study included data from between one and four therapy clients of the Maryland Psychotherapy Clinic and Research Laboratory (MPCRL) who either had not been asked to provide consent or had withdrawn consent for their data to be included in the research. An was not responsible for obtaining and verifying participant consent but agreed to the retraction of this article.] This study investigated within-client effects of session-to-session working alliance (WA) strength (mean of client's and therapists' ratings of Working Alliance Inventory [WAI] items for a session; WAI-M) and intra-individual variance of working alliance (WAI-IIV; variation in how the same individual responds to different items in the WAI for a session) of therapist and client on overall client functioning. Specifically, we explored how the strength and intra-individual variance for therapist and client working alliance at a previous session (Time t-1) would relate to overall client functioning at a current session (Time t). We also explored whether the effect of WA-M on overall client functioning would be different at different levels of WAI-IIV. The dynamic structural equation modeling (Asparouhov et al., 2018) was used to analyze longitudinal data from 4,489 sessions at a university clinic where 17 doctoral student therapists provided low-cost, open-ended, individual psychodynamic psychotherapy to 135 adult community clients. We found that client-rated WAI-M and WAI-IIV had positive within-client main effects on next-session client functioning when controlling for autoregressive effects. Findings on WAI-M by WAI-IIV interaction effects revealed that the relationship between WAI-M at a previous session and client functioning at a current session was significant only when WAI-IIV was low (i.e., high intra-individual consistency across WAI items). Therapists' WAI-M, WAI-IIV, and interaction of WAI-M and WAI-IIV did not predict the next session client functioning significantly. Limitations and implications of the present research are discussed. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2023 APA, all rights reserved).

Cultural humility, working alliance, and Outcome Rating Scale in psychodynamic psychotherapy: Between-therapist, within-therapist, and within-client effects.

We examined how client working alliance (CWA) and therapist working alliance (TWA), and client-rated functioning (Outcome Rating Scale, ORS) related to client-perceived Cultural Humility (CH) of their therapist across the course of open-ended psychodynamic psychotherapy for 118 clients and 17 therapists. Clients and therapists completed measures of the WA after every session and clients completed the ORS prior to every session. Clients also judged their therapists' CH at Session 3, 8, and then every 8th session. CH data was partitioned into within-client, within-therapist, and between-therapists components and used to predict CWA, TWA, and ORS in a 4-level Hierarchical Linear Modeling (HLM) growth model. Between-therapist differences in CH were not related to next session CWA, TWA, or ORS, nor were these differences related to growth in CWA, TWA, and ORS. Within-therapist differences in CH were only related to the next session's CWA. At the within-client level, time-periods with higher CH, compared to clients' average CH, were associated with stronger next session (i.e., the immediate subsequent session) CWA and TWA, and time periods with lower CH, compared to clients' average CH, were associated with linear increase in CWA and TWA. Time-periods with high CH, compared to clients' average CH, were associated with significant increase in client functioning. Results suggest that lower CH weakens CWA and TWA in the next session but both CWA and TWA strengthen subsequently. By contrast, greater CH has no immediate effect on outcome but with greater CH psychological functioning increased over time. Implications for practice and research are discussed. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2022 APA, all rights reserved).

The working alliance in blended versus face-to-face cognitive therapy for depression: A secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial

IntroductionWe explored the working alliance as measured by both clients and therapists. The working alliance has been known to predict the outcome of psychotherapy and is often considered an important common factor. This study raised the question of how to conceptualize the working alliance in the blended format. MethodsThis was an exploratory study derived from a randomized controlled trial comparing bCBT and face-to-face cognitive behavioural therapy (ftf CBT) on depression. The change in depressive symptoms was measured with the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) and the working alliance was measured using the Working Alliance Inventory. AnalysesCorrelation coefficients were calculated for the working alliance as reported by clients and therapists, working alliance was then examined at item and dimension level (task, bond, goal). Linear regression models were applied to investigate the predictive value of the working alliance on treatment outcome. Interaction between the level of working alliance and treatment condition was also considered. ResultsClient and therapist working alliance ratings correlated at r = 0.44 and clients rated the working alliance higher than therapists (x̄clients = 48.6, x̄therapists = 44.6). ftf CBT and bCBT had comparable joint working alliance ratings (x̄ftf = 46.4, x̄bCBT = 46.8). Items had little deviation apart from item 4 with high positive values. The level of working alliance from the total sample did not significantly predict outcome based on the client's perspective. Contrarily, seen from the therapist's perspective, it did (b = 0.00, p = .044). Using the mean from these predictors as a composite variable, was also significant (b = 0.00, p = .039, R2adj = 0.07). There was no significant interaction with treatment condition. DiscussionClients and therapists may lay emphasis on different aspects of the working alliance. The finding that therapist-rated working alliance was better than client working alliance at predicting outcome went against common findings; this pattern may be specific to bCBT. ConclusionClients rated the working alliance slightly higher than therapists on average. Clients and therapists as well as treatment conditions had different profiles on dimension deviations. Therapist ratings of the working alliance appeared to better predict treatment outcome than client ratings. Joint working alliance predicted outcome using client and therapist composite means. The working alliance was equally strong in ftf CBT and bCBT. The absence of interaction with treatment condition indicated that the working alliance was equally predictive of outcome in ftf CBT as in bCBT.

Counselors’ attachment anxiety and avoidance and the congruence in clients’ and therapists’ working alliance ratings

Objective: To determine how counselors’ attachment anxiety and avoidance related to congruence between counselors’ and clients’ Working alliance (WA) ratings. Congruence strength was defined as the regression coefficient for clients’ WA ratings predicting counselors’ WA ratings. Directional bias was defined as the difference in level between counselors’ and clients’ WA ratings. Method: Twenty-seven graduate student counselors completed an attachment measure and they and their 64 clients completed a measure of WA early in therapy. The truth-and-bias analysis was adapted to analyze the data. Results: As hypothesized counselors’ WA ratings were significantly and positively related to clients’ WA ratings. Also as hypothesized, counselors’ WA ratings were significantly lower than their clients’ WA ratings (directional bias). Increasing counselor attachment anxiety was related to increasing negative directional bias; as counselors’ attachment anxiety increased the difference between counselors and clients WA ratings became more negative. There was a significant interaction between counselor attachment anxiety and congruence strength in predicting counselor WA ratings. There was a stronger relationship between client WA ratings and counselor WA ratings for counselors low versus high in attachment anxiety. Conclusion: Counselors’ attachment anxiety is realted to their ability to accurately percieve their clients’ WA.

Adult Attachment, Multidimensional Perfectionism, and the Alliances Among Counselor Supervisees

This study examined the moderating role that 2 dimensions of perfectionism (standards [adaptive] and discrepancy [maladaptive]) had on 2 dimensions of adult attachment (anxious and avoidant) and both client and supervisory alliances among 170 counselor supervisees. Anxious attachment and discrepancy were significant negative predictors of the client working alliance. A significant 3‐way interaction was found between anxious attachment, standards, and discrepancy on the supervisory working alliance. Implications from these findings are discussed.

The Relationship Between Counseling Trainee Perfectionism and the Working Alliance With Supervisor and Client

The relationships between perfectionism, counseling self‐efficacy, and the supervisory and client working alliance were investigated among 143 counseling trainees and 46 supervisor–trainee dyads. Maladaptive perfectionism was negatively correlated with the supervisory alliance and working alliance. Counseling self‐efficacy moderated the relationship between adaptive perfectionism and the supervisory alliance (perspective of the counseling trainee) and maladaptive perfectionism and the supervisory alliance (perspective of the supervisor). The authors conclude that supervisors should consider perfectionism and counseling self‐efficacy as important factors in supervision.

Race/ethnicity as a predictor of change in working alliance during cognitive behavioral therapy for intimate partner violence perpetrators.

Despite evidence that the working alliance (WA) is an important factor in psychotherapy outcome and that race/ethnicity plays an important role in the processes of therapy, few studies have directly examined associations between WA and race/ethnicity. These relationships may be particularly salient for difficult-to-engage populations, such as men participating in treatment for intimate partner violence. The current study examined WA ratings in a sample of 107 male intimate partner violence perpetrators attending a 16-week cognitive-behavioral group program. Approximately 50% of these participants were Caucasian and 50% were members of a racial/ethnic minority group (African American, Asian American, Hispanic, and American Indian). Growth curve modeling was used to assess changes in both therapist and client WA ratings across four time points during therapy. Findings indicated that there was no mean level of change in therapist WA ratings over time. However, clients' WA ratings demonstrated a reliable, steady increase across sessions. A significant interaction between WA and race/ethnicity emerged such that Caucasian participants reported a significant increase in WA over time, whereas members of racial/ethnic minority group did not report a consistent pattern of change. The interaction between client race/ethnicity and WA was also a significant predictor of treatment outcome at 6-month follow-up.

Clinical supervision: Its influence on client-rated working alliance and client symptom reduction in the brief treatment of major depression

Abstract Supervision of psychotherapists and counselors, especially in the early years of practice, is widely accepted as being important for professional development and to ensure optimal client outcomes. Although the process of clinical supervision has been extensively studied, less is known about the impact of supervision on psychotherapy practice and client symptom outcome. This study evaluated the impact of clinical supervision on client working alliance and symptom reduction in the brief treatment of major depression. The authors randomly assigned 127 clients with a diagnosis of major depression to 127 supervised or unsupervised therapists to receive eight sessions of problems-solving treatment. Supervised therapists were randomly assigned to either alliance skill– or alliance process–focused supervision and received eight supervision sessions. Before beginning treatment, therapists received one supervision session for brief training in the working alliance supervision approach and in specific chara...

Respective Contributions of Therapist and Client Adult Attachment Orientations to the Development of the Early Working Alliance: A Preliminary Growth Modeling Study

The authors investigated the temporal relationship between client and therapist attachment orientations and early working alliance. Attachment was measured by self-report after the 1st session of therapy. The working alliance ratings were completed after the 1st, 4th, and 7th therapy sessions. Hierarchical linear modeling results indicated that anxiously attached therapists had a significant positive effect on the client working alliances after the 1st session but significant negative effects over time. No other therapist or client attachment variables or related interactions had a significant effect on client working alliance ratings. Results also indicated that time was a significant positive predictor of client working alliance ratings.

Patterns of working alliance development: A typology of client's working alliance ratings.

Patterns of working alliance development: A typology of client's working alliance ratings.

Patterns of working alliance development: A typology of client's working alliance ratings.

Patterns of working alliance development were detected by clustering working alliance ratings across 4 sessions of counseling. Results from an initial sample of recruited participants working with novice counselors (N = 38) revealed 3 patterns of alliance development labeled stable alliance, linear alliance growth, and quadratic alliance growth. Results from a replication sample (N = 41) of recruited participants also working with novice counselors, revealed 3 identical patterns of alliance development, which offered strong support for the validity of these growth patterns. As predicted by Gelso and Carter (1994), a pattern of quadratic alliance development was associated with greater improvement on measures of counseling benefit when compared to other patterns of alliance development. The discussion underscores the importance of examining both the strength (level) and pattern of development when examining the effects of the working alliance.

Toward differentiating client attachment from working alliance and transference: Reply to Robbins (1995).

S. B. Robbins (1995) provided a thought-provoking response to the article (B. Mallinckrodt, D. L. Gantt, & H. M. Coble, 1995) that described the development of the Client Attachment to Therapist Scale (CATS). In this reply, recent elaborations of attachment theory are reviewed as applied to adult close personal relationships, and points of similarity and difference between the attachment-based constructs measured by the CATS and measures of client working alliance and transference are clarified.

Working alliance, attachment memories, and social competencies of women in brief therapy.

Current social competencies and memories of attachment bonds with each parent were examined as they related to influences on formation of the working alliance. Female clients (N = 76) at 4 university and community agencies completed surveys containing the Parental Bonding Instrument, the Self-Efficacy Scale, the Adult Attachment Scale, and the Working Alliance Inventory. Results indicated that parental bonds, especially with fathers, were significantly associated with social competencies. Multiple regression analyses indicated that social competencies (self-efficacy and adult attachment) accounted for 14% of the variance in client working alliance ratings, whereas recalled parental bonds accounted for 23% of the variance. Working alliance was negatively associated with father bonds, positively associated with mother bonds, and-among social competencies-significantly associated with capacity for adult attachment

Client attachment and perceptions of the working alliance with counselor trainees.

The relationships among 3 dimensions of client attachment (depend, anxiety, and close) and client ratings of the working alliance were examined in a sample of first-time clients (N = 60) seeking services through a university-based counseling clinic. Working alliance ratings were collected from all participants immediately after their 3rd counseling session with a counselor-in-training. A significant association was found between the depend dimension of attachment and client working alliance ratings