Clearance Of Common Bile Duct Stones Research Articles

One-Stage Intraoperative ERCP combined with Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy Versus Two-Stage Preoperative ERCP Followed by Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy in the Management of Gallbladder with Common Bile Duct Stones: A Meta-analysis.

Concomitant gallbladder and common bile duct (CBD) stones, known as cholecystocholedocholithiasis, are clinically prevalent. There is currently no consensus on sequential versus simultaneous management approaches, and, if simultaneous, which approach to adopt. This meta-analysis evaluates the safety and efficacy of one-stage laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) with intraoperative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) versus two-stage ERCP followed by LC for treating concomitant gallbladder and CBD stones. A comprehensive literature search was conducted in five databases, PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, VIP, and Wanfang, for all randomized controlled trials (RCTs), cohort and retrospective studies published up to February 2024. Data extraction was performed independently by two reviewers. The primary outcomes were CBD stone clearance rate and postoperative complications morbidity. Secondary outcomes included conversion to other procedures and length of hospital stay. Statistical analyses were performed using R (v.4.3.2) with weighted mean differences and odds ratios (ORs) calculated for continuous and dichotomous variables, respectively, with 95% confidence intervals (CIs). A total of 17 studies involving 2120 patients have been included, with 898 patients receiving single-stage and 1222 patients undergoing two-stage treatment. Of these studies, 9 were RCTs and 8 were retrospective cohort study. The one-stage group demonstrated superior outcomes in terms of CBD stone clearance (OR=2.07, p=0.0004), overall morbidity (OR=0.35, p<0.0001), post-operative pancreatitis (OR=0.49, p=0.006), conversion to other procedures (OR=0.38, p=0.0006), and length of hospital stay (MD=- 2.6456, 95% CI -3.5776; -1.7136, p<0.0001). No significant differences were observed in post-operative cholangitis (OR=0.44, p=0.12), post-operative bleeding (OR=0.76, p=0.47), or bile leakage (OR=1.28, p=0.54). For patients with concomitant gallbladder and CBD stones, the one-stage approach combining ERCP and LC appears safer and more effective, with advantages including higher stone clearance rates, reduced postoperative complications (particularly pancreatitis), shorter hospital stays, fewer residual stones, and decreased need for additional procedures. However, additional high-quality clinical trials are needed to establish the optimal treatment approach for various patient scenarios.

Comparison of radiation exposure and fluoroscopy time between minimally invasive common bile duct exploration and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography for choledocholithiasis

ImportanceRadiation exposure causes dose-dependent deleterious effects and efforts should be made to decrease patient exposure to ionizing radiation. Patients with choledocholithiasis are commonly exposed to ionizing radiation as fluoroscopy-guided interventions including minimally invasive common bile duct exploration (MICBDE) and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) are the preferred treatment modalities for common bile duct (CBD) stone clearance. However, radiation exposure and fluoroscopy times have not been compared between these two treatment modalities. ObjectiveTo compare fluoroscopy time (FT) and radiation exposure (RE) between MICBDE and ERCP in patients with choledocholithiasis. DesignThis is a retrospective analysis of a prospectively maintained database of a single surgeon performing MICBDE at an academic referral center between May 2021 and June 2023 compared to a retrospective analysis of all ERCPs performed between January 2020 and February 2021. Patient demographics, procedural details, fluoroscopic details, and post operative outcomes were compared between the MICBDE and ERCP. SettingSingle institution academic referral center located in the American Southwest. Participants109 patients with choledocholithiasis were divided into 2 groups. 53 patients (48.62%) underwent ERCP, and 56 patients (51.38%) underwent MICBDE. Inclusion criteria were; all patients presenting with choledocholithiasis and subsequently underwent ERCP or MICBDE. Patients who underwent ERCP for non-choledocholithiasis related reasons were excluded. Main outcomes and measuresPrimary outcomes include FT measured in minutes and RE measured in milligray (mGy). Secondary outcomes were successful clearance of the common bile duct, complications, procedural time, and reinterventions. ResultsA significant difference (P<.001) between fluoroscopy times was identified between ERCP (3.1mins) and MICBDE (1.54mins). Median RE doses between the ERCP group (38 mGy) and the MICBDE group (38.41 mGy) were not statistically different (p=0.88). Technical success of CBD clearance was similar in both groups (91% in MICBDE group vs 93% in ERCP group; p=0.711). Conclusion and RelevanceAdvantages of MICBDE over ERCP include; treatment of choledocholithiasis at the time of cholecystectomy, which reduces the risk of additional anesthesia episodes and the introduces the potential for shorter hospital length of stay. This study shows that MICDBE has lower FT compared to ERCP and comparable RE. Given the advantages of MICBDE, it should be strongly considered at the time of laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Intraoperative transcystic laparoscopic common bile duct stone clearance with SpyGlass™ discover during emergency and elective cholecystectomy: a single-center case series

Background and study aimThe development of a new cholangioscope, the SpyGlass™ Discover (Boston Scientific), has allowed the laparoscopic transcystic common bile duct exploration and stone clearance. The possibility of simultaneous treatment of choledocholithiasis during early laparoscopic cholecystectomy offers the opportunity to enormously reduce the time between acute cholecystitis diagnosis and the execution of cholecystectomy with better outcomes for patients. Furthermore, an altered anatomy of the gastrointestinal tract is not an obstacle to this technique. The aim of the study was to determine whether this new procedure is feasible, safe, and effective.Patients and methodsThe investigation employs a retrospective case series study including all consecutive patients with a diagnosis of common bile duct stones undergoing cholecystectomy and intraoperative laparoscopic common bile duct clearance using SpyGlass™ Discover at IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo in Pavia (Italy). Eighteen patients were included from May 2022 to May 2023.ResultsA complete clearance of the common bile duct was obtained in 88.9% of patients. The mean postoperative length of stay was 3 days. No major complications occurred. After a median follow-up of 8 months, no recurrence of biliary events or readmissions occurred.ConclusionThis procedure has proven to be feasible, safe, and effective.

Single-Stage Laparoscopic Common Bile Duct Exploration and Cholecystectomy Versus Two-Stage Endoscopic Stone Extraction Followed by Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy for Patients With Cholelithiasis and Choledocholithiasis: A Systematic Review.

Gallbladder stones with common bile duct (CBD) stones can be managed by a single-stage laparoscopic approach with transcystic or transcholedochal CBD exploration and cholecystectomy or a two-stage approach with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) for stone extraction followed by laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Comparative outcomes between these approaches remain controversial. The objective was to compare single-stage laparoscopic CBD exploration and cholecystectomy versus two-stage ERCP stone removal followed by laparoscopic cholecystectomy for clearance of CBD stones, complications, length of stay, and costs.We systematically searched PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials for randomized trials and observational studies comparing outcomes of interest between single and two-stage approaches. Meta-analyses using random effects models were conducted. Seven studies with 382 patients were included. The single-stage approach achieved higher stone clearance rates (OR: 1.53, 95% CI: 1.12-2.08) with a shorter length of stay (mean duration: 3.5 days, 95% CI: -5.1 to -1.9 days) compared to the two-stage method. No significant difference was seen in complication rates (45% vs 40%, p=0.43) or costs ($19,000 vs $18,000, p=0.34). For patients with gallbladder and CBD stones, single-stage laparoscopic CBD exploration with cholecystectomy appears superior for stone clearance while comparable in safety and cost to a two-stage approach. Further randomized trials are warranted.

CONVERSION TO OPEN CHOLECYSTECTOMY - A SAFE ALTERNATIVE, NOT A FAILURE!

Background: Understanding factors that predict conversion in laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) to an open procedure is important as it allows better patient selection, preparation, operating list planning, referral, counseling and lowers the threshold for a safe conversion, thereby minimizing undue prolongation of attempts at laparoscopic completion and inadvertent complications.Methods: Records of 1010 consecutive patients who were taken up for LC, at a tertiary care teaching institute in northern India, were reviewed retrospectively. Preoperative and intraoperative characteristics of patients who underwent a successful LC were compared with those who required conversion to open surgery.Results: The conversion rate was 7.5% (76 patients). The most common reason for conversion was the inability to define the ‘Critical view of safety’ in 48, (63%) of patients. Other reasons included dense peri-cholecystic 9 (12%) and intra-abdominal 8 (11%) adhesions, suspicion of bile duct injury 4 (5%) or malignancy 3 (4%). Prior upper abdominal surgery, intraoperative finding of a contracted and thick-walled gallbladder (GB), empyema GB, Mirizzi’s syndrome, cholecysto-enteric fistula, and a prior endoscopic common bile duct stone clearance were significant predictors of conversion. Xanthogranulomatous cholecystitis was found more commonly (43% vs 5%) in the conversion group.Conclusion: Conversion to an open procedure during LC should always be treated as an integral component of sound judgement to achieve the safest outcome in a particular patient. Due consideration of pre-operative and intra-operative factors predictive of a higher chance of conversion assists pre-operative patient preparation and counseling as well as surgical planning, conduct and mentoring of residents-in-training.

PREDICTORS OF FAILURE OF ENDOSCOPIC RETROGRADE CHOLANGIOPANCREATOGRAPHY IN CLEARING BILE DUCT STONES DURING INDEX PROCEDURE - A PROSPECTIVE STUDY.

Common bile duct (CBD) stones are known to complicate 10-15% of gallstone diseases. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is the therapeutic modality of choice for bile duct clearance in CBD stones but may fail to achieve stone clearance. This prospective study was done to identify the predictors of failure of CBD clearance with ERCP. This prospective study was done to identify the predictors of failure of CBD clearance with ERCP. All consecutive patients with bile duct stones undergoing ERCP at a tertiary care center were prospectively included from October 2020 to October 2021. The study's primary outcome was to identify and analyze factors that could predict the failure of complete CBD clearance. A total of 120 patients (50.8% males, median age: 53.5 years) were included in the final analysis. Successful clearance of CBD stones during the index procedure was achieved in 70% of patients. At a cut-off stone diameter of >10.5 mm and CBD diameter of >12.5 mm, the AUC was 0.890 and 0.884, respectively, to predict failed clearance of CBD. On multivariate analysis, stone diameter ≥15 mm [odds ratio (OR) 16.97, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.629-176.785], location of stones in hepatic ducts (OR 7.74, 95%CI: 2.041-29.332), presence of stricture distal to stone (OR 6.99, 95%CI: 1.402-34.726) and impacted stone (OR 21.61, 95%CI: 1.84-253.058) were independent predictors of failed bile duct clearance. Stone size and location are independent predictors of failed bile duct clearance. The endoscopist should consider these factors while subjecting a patient to biliary ductal clearance to plan additional intervention. • Failure to clear bile duct stones in the index ERCP can be seen in 15-20% of cases, and identifying the factors associated with failure is important. • A prospective analysis was conducted to identify and analyze the factors that could predict the failure of complete CBD clearance. • The present study reported a successful clearance of CBD stones during the index procedure in only 70% of patients. • A stone diameter ≥15 mm, location of stones in hepatic ducts, presence of stricture distal to stone, and impacted stone were independent predictors of failed bile duct clearance.

Orlando Protocol for single session ductal clearance of common bile duct stones at endosopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography.

Approach to management of common bile duct stones (CBDS) by endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is not standardized. We examined outcomes by applying predetermined protocol for CBDS management. When standard extraction techniques failed at ERCP, presence of tapered bile duct and stone-duct ratio were calculated. Large balloon sphincteroplasty (LBS) and/or mechanical/single-operator cholangioscopy-guided lithotripsy was performed based on presence of tapered bile duct and stone-duct mismatch. Primary outcome was single-session ductal clearance. Secondary outcome was adverse events. Of 409 patients treated over 16 months, 321 (78.5%) had no tapered bile duct or stone-duct mismatch, and single-session ductal clearance was achieved using standard techniques in 99.7% over median duration of 14 min (interquartile range [IQR] 9-21 min). Of 88 (21.5%) patients with difficult CBDS, tapered duct was seen in 79 (89.8%) and/or stone-duct mismatch in 36 (40.9%). Single-session ductal clearance was achieved in all 88 patients (100%) by LBS in 79 (89.8%), mechanical lithotripsy in 20 (22.7%), and single-operator cholangioscopy-guided lithotripsy in 16 (18.2%) over a median duration of 29 min (IQR 17-47 min). Overall, single-session ductal clearance was achieved in 99.8% with adverse events in 17 (4.2%) that included perforation in two, postsphincterotomy bleeding in one, and mild/moderate post-ERCP pancreatitis in 14 patients. A predetermined protocol optimized outcomes by enabling single-session ductal clearance of CBDS with high technical success and low adverse events.

Feasibility and safety of intraoperative bile duct clearance by antegrade transcystic balloon sphincteroplasty: A prospective observational pilot study.

Concomitant cholecystolithiasis and choledocholithiasis are common. Standard treatments are endoscopic retrograde cholangiography (ERC) followed by cholecystectomy or laparoendoscopic rendezvous. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiography has drawbacks, such as post-ERC pancreatitis or bleeding, and potentially more than one intervention is required to address common bile duct (CBD) stones. Safety and feasibility of an intraoperative antegrade transcystic single-stage approach during cholecystectomy with balloon sphincteroplasty and pushing of stones to the duodenum has not been evaluated prospectively. The aim of this pilot study was to evaluate this procedure regarding safety, feasibility, and stone clearance rate. Prospective single-center intervention study (SUPER Reporting-Guideline). Main inclusion criterion was confirmed choledocholithiasis (stones ≤6 mm) at intraoperative cholangiography. Success of the procedure was defined as CBD stone clearance at intraoperative control cholangiography, absence of symptoms and no elevated cholestasis parameters at 6 weeks follow-up. Simon's two-stage design was used to determine sample size. From January 2021 to April 2022, a total of 57 patients fulfilled the final inclusion criteria and were included. Mild pancreatitis or cholangitis were present upon admission in 15 (26%) and 15 (26%) patients, respectively. Median number of CBD-stones was 1 (1-6). Median stone diameter was 4 mm (0.1-6 mm). Common bile duct stone clearance was achieved in 54 patients (94%). The main reason for failed CBD clearance was the inability to push the guidewire along the biliary stone into the duodenum. Median intervention time was 28 minutes (14-129 minutes). While there was no postoperative pancreatitis, two patients (3.5%) had asymptomatic hyperlipasemia 4 hours postoperatively. Intraoperative CBD stone clearance by antegrade balloon sphincteroplasty appears to be safe and highly feasible. Its overall superiority to the current standards warrants evaluation by a randomized controlled trial. Therapeutic/Care Management, Level V.

Endoscopic clearance of non-complex biliary stones using fluoroscopy-free direct solitary cholangioscopy: Initial multicenter experience.

Fluoroscopy-free endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography for common bile duct stone (CBDS) clearance is usually offered only to pregnant patients. We initiated a multicenter, randomized controlled trial comparing clearance of non-complex CBDSs using fluoroscopy-free direct solitary cholangioscopy (DSC) to standard endoscopic retrograde cholangiography (ERC) to evaluate the wider applicability of the DSC-based approach. Here we report the initial results of stone clearance and safety in roll-in cases for the randomized controlled trial. Twelve expert endoscopists at tertiary care centers in four countries prospectively enrolled 47 patients with non-complex CBDSs for DSC-assisted CBDS removal in an index procedure including fluoroscopy-free cannulation. Successful CBDS clearance was first determined by DSC and subsequently validated by final occlusion cholangiogram as the ERC gold standard. Fully fluoroscopy-free cannulation was successful in 42/47 (89.4%) patients. Brief fluoroscopy with minimal contrast injection was used in 4/47 (8.5%) patients during cannulation. Cannulation failed in 1/47 (2.1%) patients. Fluoroscopy-free complete stone clearance was reached in 38/46 (82.6%) cases. Residual stones were detected in the validation ERC occlusion cholangiogram in three cases. Overall serious adverse event rate was 2.1% (95% confidence interval 0.1-11.3): postprocedural pancreatitis in one patient. In patients with non-complex CBDS, the fluoroscopy-free technique is easily transferred to endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography experts with acceptable rates of cannulation and stone clearance and few serious adverse events. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03421340).

Laparo-endoscopic Rendezvous in the Treatment of Cholecystocholedocholithiasis: A Single Center Initial Experience

Cholecystocholedocholithiasis is a common disease worldwide; however, there is still no consensus regarding a gold standard therapy for its management. Nowadays, the preferred method is a “two-step” process, starting with an endoscopic common bile duct (CBD) stone extraction (endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography [ERCP]) followed by a laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). Nevertheless, this “two-step” approach has shown some difficulties over time (i.e., need for two hospital admissions, need of at least two anesthesia inductions, higher rate of post-procedural pancreatitis, longer hospitalizations and thus, increased costs). On the other hand, the laparo-endoscopic rendezvous (LER), which is a simultaneous combined procedure for removing the gallbladder laparoscopically and clearing the CBD endoscopically, is another valid treatment modality that involves a “single-step” resolution of cholecystocholedocholithiasis applying a multidisciplinary approach of the patient. The aim of this study was to present our initial outcomes. We retrospectively analyzed eleven patients who consecutively underwent LER at our institution from May 2017 to March 2022. The patients’ mean age was 50.6 years old (range, 34 - 68) and most were male 54.5% (6/11). LER successfully achieved CBD stone clearance in 90.9% (10/11) of the cases. Post-LER pancreatitis was not recorded in any case. Post-operative complications included one reoperation (1/11; 9.1%) due to bleeding from one of the laparoscopic trocar sites. Our group concluded that LER can be effectively applied in Perú with good mid-term results and confirmed its effectiveness in accomplishing C sults, we recommend the use of LER as a safe and valid therapeutic option for our patients.

EGS P32V Laparoscopic transcystic Antegrade Biliary Stenting

Abstract Background Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is the gold standard treatment for symptomatic cholelithiasis including pancreatitis. Symptomatic gall stones patients have up to 20% risk of having common bile duct (CBD) stones too. Although, guidelines have been laid down for management of suspected CBD stones, in practice there is a lot of variability and lack of standardisation. The waiting list for Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) is long, resulting in delayed treatment and increased length of hospital stay. Similarly, pre-operative endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) can also increase the length of hospital stay due to long waiting lists, limited availability and overall risk of complications as high as 30%. Hence, the role of on-table cholangiogram (OTC) while performing laparoscopic cholecystectomy has been explored. The guidelines state that OTC should be performed in fit for surgery patients, without pre-operative investigations for diagnosing CBD stones. We have been practising early cholecystectomy with on-table cholangiogram (during the index admission), with selective insertion of antegrade biliary stent in patients with choledocholithiasis. We facilitate ERCP with stent removal and clearance of CBD stones after 4 weeks post-operatively. We aim to present our technique of laparoscopic antegrade biliary stent insertion. Methods We follow the standard four-port technique for Laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Following dissection of Calot's triangle and visualisation of ‘critical view of safety’, an on-table cholangiogram is performed using a standard technique. If CBD stones are visualised, a transcystic antegrade stenting is done by Seldinger technique (without clearing the CBD of stones). The cholangiogram catheter is removed and flex-tip ureteric catheter is inserted transcystically. Through the ureteric catheter a flex-tip guidewire is inserted into CBD till its tip is visualised in the duodenum, under C-arm guidance. The ureteral catheter is then withdrawn carefully with guidewire placed satisfactorily. A double pig tail end biliary stent is rail-roaded over the guidewire, using a pushing catheter fashioned appropriately. As soon as the tip of the stent is visualised beyond the ampulla (in the X-ray), the guidewire and pushing catheter are withdrawn. The curling up of both ends of the stent is visualised and confirmed through C-arm guidance. Thereafter the procedure of cholecystectomy, as standard, is completed. Results The results of this procedure were analysed from 2014 to 2017, and subsequently published in 2018. Conclusions This technique does not involve skills required for CBD exploration. Hence, can be performed by general surgeons with expertise in minimal access surgeries, as it does not involve a steep learning curve. This technique is safe, reliable and cost-effective. It also decreases delays in biliary decompression, in-hospital stay and ensures timely treatment.

Outcomes following common bile duct exploration versus endoscopic stone extraction before, during and after laparoscopic cholecystectomy for patients with common bile duct stones

BackgroundLaparoscopic common bile duct exploration (LCBDE) and endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) are two methods of retrieving common bile duct (CBD) stones. The best method for CBD stone removal is debatable. The aim of this study was to compare outcomes following LCBDE and/or ERCP, including laparoscopic cholecystectomy. MethodsData were collected retrospectively for patients undergoing LCBDE and/or ERCP at a single centre from 2008 to 2018. Patients were grouped by intention-to-treat (single-stage LCBDE, pre-operative-, intra-operative-, or post-operative ERCP) and eventual plan (surgical or endoscopic). Outcomes included complication rates (minor Clavien-Dindo 1/2, major Clavien-Dindo 3/4, non-biliary complications) and mortality. ResultsOf 671 patients, 578 patients received LCBDE and 93 patients received ERCP as primary care. Endoscopic clearance had significantly higher complications and mortality compared to surgical clearance. On an intention-to-treat basis LCBDE had the lowest minor-, major- and non-biliary complications, and mortality (5.2%, 6.1%, 2.9% and 0.5%, respectively), whilst pre-operative ERCP the worst (39.6%, 27.1%, 29.2% and 8.3%, respectively) (p=<0.001). LCBDE and postERCP had similar major complications and mortality. ConclusionSurgical clearance of CBD stones was potentially safer than endoscopic clearance. Pre-operative ERCP had the worst outcomes. LCBDE and postERCP are likely to have similar short-term patient outcomes.

Predictors for stone recurrence after a successful common bile duct surgical exploration for choledocholithiasis.

Recurrence after common bile duct stone (CBDS) clearance is the major long-term drawback of their management. Its prevalence is significant, and it occurs after all primary therapeutic alternatives. The aim of this study was to determine the predictive factors associated with stone recurrence after surgical common bile duct exploration (CBDE). A retrospective cohort study based on patients undergoing CBDE between 2000 and 2018 was conducted. Uni- and multivariate hierarchical regression analyses were performed to assess the independent predictive factors associated with recurrent CBDS in patients with initially successful surgery. A total of 365 patients underwent successful surgical procedures. After a median follow-up of 43.2 (IQR 84) months, 31 (8.4%) patients were diagnosed with CBD stone recurrence. The median time to recurrence was 30.3 (IQR 38) months. The only variable associated with CBDS recurrence was preoperative endoscopic sphincterotomy (HR 2.436, 95% CI: 1.031-5.751, P = 0.042)). Patients who undergo preoperative endoscopic sphincterotomy and then cholecystectomy with successful common bile duct clearance may be at increased risk for recurrent stone disease compared to those who go straight to surgery.

Complete Endoscopic Clearance of Common Bile Duct Stones

Common bile duct stones (CBDS) are the most common cause of acute cholangitis. Removal by endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography became the standard of care after endoscopic sphincterotomy was introduced. On the other hand, it is still difficult to remove 10-15% of CBDS completely in the first attempt for various reasons. This review describes the methods for the complete endoscopic clearance of CBDS, including difficult cases, reflecting the latest knowledge and techniques.

Endoscopic Papillary Large Balloon Dilation Reduces Further Recurrence in Patients With Recurrent Common Bile Duct Stones: A Randomized Controlled Trial.

Up to 60% of patients with common bile duct stone (CBDS) recurrence suffer from further recurrence after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP). There are no effective methods to prevent recurrence in most patients. In this study, we aimed to assess the short-term and long-term efficacies of endoscopic papillary large balloon dilation (EPLBD) for the management of recurrent CBDS in a randomized controlled trial. Consecutive patients with recurrent CBDS were eligible and randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to the EPLBD group or the control group. The primary outcome was the CBDS recurrence rate within 2 years after ERCP. The analysis followed the intention-to-treat principle. From 2014 to 2021, 180 patients with recurrent CBDS were included, with 90 in each group. All patients underwent complete CBDS clearance by 1 or several sessions of ERCP. The rate of complete clearance in 1 session was significantly higher with EPLBD treatment (95.6% vs 85.6%, P = 0.017). During the follow-up, the CBDS recurrence rate within 2 years was significantly lower in the EPLBD group than in the control group (21.1% [19/90] vs 36.7% [33/90], relative risk 0.58, 95% confidence interval 0.36-0.93, P = 0.021). At a median follow-up of approximately 56 months, CBDS recurrence was found in 34.4% of the patients (31/90) in the EPLBD group and 51.1% (46/90) in the control group (hazard ratio 0.57, 95% confidence interval 0.36-0.89, P = 0.012). Multiple recurrences (≥2) were also decreased in the EPLBD group (4.4% vs 18.9%, P = 0.020). During the long-term follow-up, nearly half of the patients with recurrent CBDS experienced stone recurrence after traditional ERCP. Our study was the first to show that EPLBD effectively reduced the recurrence of CBDS.

Endoscopic papillary large balloon dilation with or without sphincterotomy for extraction of large bile duct stones

ObjectivesThis work aimed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of endoscopic papillary large balloon dilatation (EPLBD) with or without endoscopic sphincterotomy (EST) in extraction of large common bile duct stones (CBDSs).BackgroundEST combined with EPLBD has been proposed as an alternative to manage large bile duct stones. However, recent reports indicate that EPLBD alone may be safe and effective in this setting.Patients and methodsFrom July 2019 to December 2021, we prospectively compared EPLBD alone (group I, n=100) with EST+EPLBD (group II, n=100) for the treatment of large CBDSs. CBDS clearance rate, frequency of mechanical lithotripsy usage, total procedure time, and intraendoscopic and postendoscopic complications were analyzed.ResultsStatistical analysis revealed that there were no significant differences between the studied groups regarding the use of mechanical lithotripsy (6 vs. 8%, P=0.579), overall and initial stone clearance rates (92 vs. 88%, P=0.346; and 81 vs. 76%, P=0.389, respectively), procedure-related pancreatitis (3 vs. 1%, P=0.312), or other intraendoscopic and postendoscopic adverse events, but there was a significant difference in terms of total procedure time (41.23±10.6 vs. 36.87±8.06, P=0.001).ConclusionThe therapeutic outcomes and complications of sole EPLBD for the removal of large CBDSs were comparable to those of EPLBD with prior EST.

Surgical methods of treatment for cholecystolithiasis combined with choledocholithiasis: six years’ experience of a single institution

IntroductionThe optimal treatment of choledocholithiasis combined with cholecystolithiasis remains controversial. Common surgical methods vary among endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) followed by laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC), laparoscopic transcystic common bile duct exploration (LTCBDE), laparoscopic transductal common bile duct exploration (LCBDE) with or without T-tube drainage. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of surgical methods and to determine the appropriate procedure for patients with cholecystolithiasis combined with choledocholithiasis.MethodsFrom January 2013 to January 2019, a total of 1555 consecutive patients diagnosed with cholecystolithiasis combined with choledocholithiasis who underwent surgical treatment in Tongji Hospital were retrospectively analyzed. Total 521 patients with intrahepatic bile duct stones underwent LC + LCBDE + T-Tube were excluded from the analysis. At last, 1034 patients who met the inclusion criteria were divided into three groups according to their surgical methods: preoperative ERCP + subsequent LC (ERCP + LC group, n = 275), LC + LCBDE + intraoperative endoscopic nasobiliary drainage (ENBD) + primary duct closure (Tri-scope group, n = 479) and LC + laparoscopic transcystic CBD exploration (LTCBDE group, n = 280). Clinical records, operative findings and postoperative follow-up were collected and analyzed.ResultsThere was no mortality in three groups. Common bile duct (CBD) stone clearance rate was 97.5% in ERCP + LC group, 98.7% in Tri-scope group, and 99.3% in LTCBDE group. There were no difference in terms of demographic characteristics, biochemistry findings and presentations, but the Tri-scope group had the biggest diameter and amount of stones and diameter of CBD, the LTCBDE group had the least CBD stones and the biggest diameter of cystic gall duct (CGD). ERCP + LC group have the longest hospital stay (14.16 ± 3.88 days vs 6.92 ± 1.71 days vs 10.74 ± 5.30 days, P < 0.05), also has the longest operative time than others (126.08 ± 42.79 min vs 92.31 ± 10.26 min, 99.09 ± 8.46 min, P < 0.05). Compared to ERCP + LC group, LTCBDE group and Tri-scope group had lower postoperation-leukocyte, shorter surgery duration and hospital stay (P < 0.05). Compared to the Tri-scope group, the LTCBDE group had the shorter hospital stay, extubation time and operation time and less intraoperative bleeding. There were less postoperative complications in LTCBDE group (1.1%) compared to the ERCP + LC group (3.6%) and Tri-scope group (2.2%). Follow-up time was 6 to 72 months. Four patients in ERCP + LC group and 5 in Tri-scope group reported recurrent stones.ConclusionAll the three surgical methods are safe and effective. Tri-scope approach and LTCBDE approach have superiority to preoperative ERCP + LC. LC + LTCBDE shows priority over Tri-scope approach, but should be performed in selected patients. LC + LCBDE + T-Tube can be an alternative management if the other three procedures were failed. The surgeons should choose the most appropriate surgical procedure according to the preoperative examination results and intraoperative situation.

Impact of single-stage laparoscopic trans-cystic exploration on hospital procedures, admissions and length-of-stay in common bile duct stone clearance.

Single-stage approach with bile duct exploration is considered the most efficient and cost-effective method of bile duct clearance. In Australia, apart from centres with subspecialty interests, notably in Brisbane, Queensland, a multi-stage approach with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is used more frequently. We aim to evaluate the impact of single stage laparoscopic trans-cystic exploration (LTCE) versus multi-stage approach for choledocholithiasis. This was a retrospective cohort study. Medicare Benefits Schedule codings were used to identify patients who had the following procedures between December 2011 and December 2019: laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) and ERCP, LC and LTCE, LC and LTCE and ERCP. Primary outcomes were number of hospital procedures, admissions and additive length of stay (aLOS), the cumulative hospital stay from admission to discharge. Of 607 patients, 204 (34%) patients received a single-stage LTCE, while 403 (66%) patients had a multi-stage approach. In the LTCE group, 82% (168) patients and 93% (190) patients had one procedure and one admission respectively for stone clearance (P=0.001). The median aLOS was 4 days for LTCE versus 7 days for multi-stage approach (P=0.001; 95% CI for difference - 3 to -2). In the multi-stage group, 16% (65) patients had three or more procedures and 49% (199) patients required two or more hospital admissions to achieve stone clearance. LTCE for stone clearance can be successfully accomplished with reductions in hospital admissions, number of procedures and length of stay. This has further economic and health resource implications.

Anatomical mapping of the biliary tree during laparoscopic cholecystectomy by using indocyanine green dye.

Background:Fluorescent cholangiography using intravenous indocyanine green (ICG) is a noninvasive technique that enables real-time intraoperative imaging of biliary anatomy. The objective of this study was to visualise the biliary anatomy in routine and complicated cases of laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC).Methods:This was a prospective observational study of patients undergoing LC for various indications. After obtaining consent, 5 mg/1 ml of ICG dye was administered intravenously in each patient, 2 h before the incision time. LC was performed by standard critical view of the safety technique. The biliary tree was visualised using near-infrared (NIR) view before clipping any structure. Intra-operative findings, visibility of ducts in the NIR view, conversion, adverse reactions to ICG and post-operative outcomes in all patients were recorded.Results:Out of 43 patients undergoing LC, 24 had cholelithiasis, 10 had acute cholecystitis, 3 had chronic cholecystitis, 1 had mucocele of the gall bladder, 1 had gall bladder polyp and 4 cases had common bile duct (CBD) stone clearance with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Cystic duct (CD) and CBD were visualised in 100% of cases among all groups except for those with acute cholecystitis where CD and CBD were visualised in 90% and 80% of cases, respectively, and in chronic cholecystitis CD and CBD were visualised in 66.6% and 80% of patients, respectively. There was one elective conversion in the chronic cholecystitis group due to dense adhesions and non-progression. Only the CBD was visualised in this case. There were no cases of CBD injury or any allergic reactions to the dye.Conclusions:Fluorescent cholangiography during LC is a safe and non-invasive method, allowing superior anatomical visualisation of the biliary tree in comparison to simple laparoscopy. This method can correct misinterpretation errors and detect aberrant duct anatomy, thus increasing the confidence of the operating surgeon enabling safe dissection. This simple technique has the potential to become standard practice to avoid bile duct injury during LC.

Could saline irrigation clear all residual common bile duct stones after lithotripsy? A self-controlled prospective cohort study

BACKGROUNDA previous study showed that irrigation with 100 mL saline reduced residual common bile duct (CBD) stones, which potentially cause recurrent stones after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography.AIMTo determine whether saline irrigation can improve CBD clearance after lithotripsy.METHODSThis prospective self-controlled study enrolled patients receiving mechanical lithotripsy for large (> 1.2 cm) CBD stones. After occlusion cholangiography confirmed CBD stone clearance, peroral cholangioscopy (POC) was performed to determine clearance scores based on the number of residual stones. The amounts of residual stones spotted via POC were graded on a 5-point scale (score 1, worst; score 5, best). Scores were documented after only stone removal (control) and after irrigation with 50 mL and 100 mL saline, respectively. The stone composition was analyzed using infrared spectroscopy.RESULTSBetween October 2018 and January 2020, 47 patients had CBD clearance scores of 2.4 ± 1.1 without saline irrigation, 3.5 ± 0.7 with 50 mL irrigation, and 4.6 ± 0.6 with 100 mL irrigation (P < 0.001). Multivariate analysis showed that CBD diameter > 15 mm [odds ratio (OR) = 0.08, 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.01-0.49; P = 0.007] and periampullary diverticula (PAD) (OR = 6.51, 95%CI: 1.08-39.21; P = 0.041) were independent risk factors for residual stones. Bilirubin pigment stones constituted the main residual stones found in patients with PAD (P = 0.004).CONCLUSIONIrrigation with 100 mL of saline may not clear all residual CBD stones after lithotripsy, especially in patients with PAD and/or a dilated (> 15 mm) CBD. Pigment residual stones are soft and commonly found in patients with PAD. Additional saline irrigation may be required to remove retained stones.