Classification Of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Research Articles

Prognostic Value of the 2019 EULAR/American College of Rheumatology Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Classification Criteria to Renal Response One Year After Treatment in a Cohort With Childhood-Onset Lupus Nephritis.

In 2019, the EULAR/American College of Rheumatology developed classification criteria for systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). A positive correlation between summary score at diagnosis and SLE disease activity at five years has been noted in adult patients with lupus, but little is known among the pediatric population. We evaluated the prognostic value of higher summary scores and number of extrarenal domains at diagnosis (low/moderate number [1-5] vs high number [6-9]) to renal outcomes after one year of treatment in pediatric patients with lupus nephritis (LN). This retrospective, single-center cohort study included 74 pediatric patients with LN. Published pediatric renal response definitions were used for our outcome measure (no, partial, and complete response). Descriptive statistics were reported, and an ordinal logistic regression estimated adjusted odds ratios (ORs) for renal response including 95% confidence intervals (CIs). Patients with high extrarenal domains had OR 1.47 (95% CI 0.55-2.91) of having a complete renal response compared to patients with low/moderate domains. Patients with a summary score <30 had OR 1.31 (95% CI 0.50-3.44) of having a complete renal response relative to a summary score ≥30, though a larger proportion of patients with a summary score of ≥30 had no renal response after one year of treatment. More extrarenal domains at diagnosis did not have a statistically significant impact on renal response at one year, nor did a higher summary score. However, a larger portion of patients with a summary score <30 achieved complete renal response compared to patients with a score ≥30.

Enrolment of the first paediatric cohort into the Australian lupus registry and biobank: A single-centre experience.

We aim to report on the feasibility of establishment of the first paediatric cohort as part of the longitudinal database of the Australian Lupus Registry and Biobank (ALRB) and to describe the enrolment data with a focus on clinical characteristics, serological data, treatment strategies and patient/parent-reported outcome measures. All patients under the age of 18years with a diagnosis of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) attending the paediatric rheumatology service of a single, tertiary hospital were identified. Patients were enrolled in the ALRB if they met ≥4/11 of the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 1997 SLE classification criteria or the Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics (SLICC) 2012 classification criteria. Enrolment data including demographics, clinical characteristics, serological profiles, disease activity and damage assessments were recorded. Peds-QL Rheumatology and General Modules were used to assess patient and parent-reported outcomes. Twenty-seven patients were eligible for inclusion, with 26 patients (96%) consenting for enrolment. Twenty-five patients (92%) consented for biobanking. Twenty patients (77%) were female. The median age at enrolment was 16years (interquartile range (IQR) 13.7, 17.4). The median disease duration from diagnosis was 3.2years (IQR 1.4, 5.3). Sixteen patients (62%) had synovitis, 16 (62%) had cutaneous involvement, 4 (15%) had serositis, 17 (65%) had haematological involvement and 7 (27%) had renal involvement at enrolment. Nineteen patients (73%) were prescribed at least two disease-modifying anti-rheumatic medications (DMARDs). Hydroxychloroquine (n = 22, 85%) and mycophenolate mofetil (n = 9, 35%) were the most commonly prescribed DMARDs. The median SLEDAI-2K score was 2 (IQR 2, 4). Six patients (23%) had active disease (SLEDAI-2K ≥6) at enrolment. Three patients (11.5%) had reported damage using the SLICC/ACR Damage Index. Twenty-three children (88%) and eighteen parents (69%) completed the Paediatric Quality of Life Inventory. Quality of life scores reported across domains of physical, emotional, social and school functioning at enrolment were comparable to previously studied paediatric cohorts with SLE and other chronic diseases. We have established our centre as the first paediatric participating site of the ALRB, providing contemporary data on the clinical characteristics, serological profile and health-related quality of life outcomes of Australian children with SLE. Paediatric involvement with this national registry will provide a unique perspective for future clinical and scientific research. Collection of Australian-specific paediatric longitudinal data will also enable a broader understanding of SLE within a multicultural Australian population.

Prevalence of concomitant rheumatologic diseases and autoantibody specificities among racial and ethnic groups in SLE patients.

Leveraging the Manhattan Lupus Surveillance Program (MLSP), a population-based registry of cases of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) and related diseases, we investigated the proportion of SLE with concomitant rheumatic diseases, including Sjögren's disease (SjD), antiphospholipid syndrome (APLS), and fibromyalgia (FM), as well as the prevalence of autoantibodies in SLE by sex and race/ethnicity. Prevalent SLE cases fulfilled one of three sets of classification criteria. Additional rheumatic diseases were defined using modified criteria based on data available in the MLSP: SjD (anti-SSA/Ro positive and evidence of keratoconjunctivitis sicca and/or xerostomia), APLS (antiphospholipid antibody positive and evidence of a blood clot), and FM (diagnosis in the chart). 1,342 patients fulfilled SLE classification criteria. Of these, SjD was identified in 147 (11.0%, 95% CI 9.2-12.7%) patients with women and non-Latino Asian patients being the most highly represented. APLS was diagnosed in 119 (8.9%, 95% CI 7.3-10.5%) patients with the highest frequency in Latino patients. FM was present in 120 (8.9%, 95% CI 7.3-10.5) patients with non-Latino White and Latino patients having the highest frequency. Anti-dsDNA antibodies were most prevalent in non-Latino Asian, Black, and Latino patients while anti-Sm antibodies showed the highest proportion in non-Latino Black and Asian patients. Anti-SSA/Ro and anti-SSB/La antibodies were most prevalent in non-Latino Asian patients and least prevalent in non-Latino White patients. Men were more likely to be anti-Sm positive. Data from the MLSP revealed differences among patients classified as SLE in the prevalence of concomitant rheumatic diseases and autoantibody profiles by sex and race/ethnicity underscoring comorbidities associated with SLE.

Clinical and Immunological Profile of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: A 5-year Retrospective Analysis from Northeast India.

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a chronic inflammatory disease with a wide range of clinical manifestations having considerable variation in clinical features that are influenced by ethnic, sociocultural, and geographical factors. This disease primarily affects young women aged between 18 and 35 years. The aim of this present study was to delineate the clinical manifestations and immunological patterns of SLE patients from the Northeastern (NE) region of India. The study was carried out in a tertiary care hospital from January 2016 to January 2021. Adult patients of age >18 years fulfilling systemic lupus international collaborating clinic criteria (SLICC) for classification of SLE were included in this study. Immunology such as antinuclear antibodies (ANA) and double-stranded deoxyribonucleic acid (dsDNA) were also performed followed by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Over a period of 5 years, 142 patients were recruited for the study, with an overall female-to-male ratio was 9.9:1, a median age at onset of 25 years (interquartile range age 21-32 years) and a mean disease duration was 15.25 months (range 2-60 months). Our study revealed that ANA was positive in 97.18% of patients while anti-dsDNA was positive in 78.68%, indicating that women from this region have higher positivity rates. Our findings support the notion that SLE is a multisystem disorder that predominantly affects young females, especially during the second and third decades of life. Hematological, mucocutaneous, and renal manifestations are common in our patients. Moreover, pulmonary, cardiovascular, and gastrointestinal (GI) manifestations were understudied in other cohorts, which is one of our study's strengths.

Classifying systemic lupus erythematosus using laboratory items alone: a preliminary study.

To explore the performance of laboratory items alone in systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) classification. Our cohort consisted of 352 and 385 (control) patients with and without SLE. This study evaluated the performance of the American College of Rheumatology (ACR)-1997, Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics (SLICC)-2012, European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR)/ACR-2019, and Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Risk Probability Index (SLERPI) using laboratory items alone, including blood and urine test results. The median ratio of laboratory items/total items was 66.7%, 75.0%, 60.4%, and 77.4% in ACR-1997, SLICC-2012, EULAR/ACR-2019, and SLERPI, respectively. After including laboratory items alone, the sensitivity of ACR-1997, SLICC-2012, EULAR/ACR-2019, and SLERPI was 31.3% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 26.4%-36.4%), 79.8% (95% CI: 75.3%-83.9%), 75.9% (95% CI: 71.0%-80.2%), and 85.2% (95% CI: 81.1%-88.8%), respectively. We referenced the SLERPI and removed the additional restrictions, i.e., SLICC-2012 criteria only needs to fulfill at least four items (mSLICC-2012) and EULAR/ACR-2019 criteria needs to have ≥ 10 points (mEULAR/ACR-2019) to qualify for SLE classification. The mSLICC-2012 and mEULAR/ACR-2019 criteria, including laboratory items alone, newly identified 13 and 25 patients, respectively. Based on laboratory items alone, the combination of mSLICC-2012, mEULAR/ACR-2019, and SLERPI identified 348 patients with an improved sensitivity of 90.6% (95% CI: 87.1%-93.5%). Patients, who were classified according to the mEULAR/ACR-2019 criteria, all met the other criteria. Incorporating laboratory items alone was clinically feasible to help identify SLE. SLERPI and SLICC-2012, using laboratory items alone, were more worthwhile to promote in the clinic compared with EULAR/ACR-2019. Key Points • Laboratory items play a crucial role in the SLE classification criteria, and incorporating laboratory items alone was clinically feasible to help in the identification of SLE. • The SLERPI and SLICC-2012, using laboratory items alone, were more worthwhile to promote in the clinic compared with EULAR/ACR-2019, and the combination of the two could further improve the sensitivity. • The relative simplicity of evaluating laboratory indices may help nonrheumatologists and inexperienced rheumatologists to identify SLE more quickly, thereby reducing the risk of delayed diagnosis in patients.

The greatest contribution to medical science is the transformation from studying symptoms to studying their causes-the unrelenting legacy of Robert Koch and Louis Pasteur-and a causality perspective to approach a definition of SLE.

The basic initiative related to this study is derived from the fact that systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a unique and fertile system science subject. We are, however, still far from understanding its nature. It may be fair to indicate that we are spending more time and resources on studying the complexity of classified SLE than studying the validity of classification criteria. This study represents a theoretical analysis of current instinctual SLE classification criteria based on "the causality principle." The discussion has its basis on the radical scientific traditions introduced by Robert Koch and Louis Pasteur. They announced significant changes in our thinking of disease etiology through the implementation of the modern version of "the causality principle." They influenced all aspects of today's medical concepts and research: the transformation of medical science from studies of symptoms to study their causes, relevant for monosymptomatic diseases as for syndromes. Their studies focused on bacteria as causes of infectious diseases and on how the immune system adapts to control and prevent contagious spreading. This is the most significant paradigm shift in the modern history of medicine and resulted in radical changes in our view of the immune system. They described acquired post-infection immunity and active immunization by antigen-specific vaccines. The paradigm "transformation" has a great theoretical impact also on current studies of autoimmune diseases like SLE: symptoms and their cause(s). In this study, the evolution of SLE classification and diagnostic criteria is discussed from "the causality principle" perspective, and if contemporary SLE classification criteria are as useful as believed today for SLE research. This skepticism is based on the fact that classification criteria are not selected based on cogent causal strategies. The SLE classification criteria do not harmonize with Koch's and Pasteur's causality principle paradigms and not with Witebsky's Koch-derived postulates for autoimmune and infectious diseases. It is not established whether the classification criteria can separate SLE as a "one disease entity" from "SLE-like non-SLE disorders"-the latter in terms of SLE imitations. This is discussed here in terms of weight, rank, and impact of the classification criteria: Do they all originate from "one basic causal etiology"? Probably not.

Clinical and Serologic Phenotyping and Damage Indices in Patients With Systemic Lupus Erythematosus With and Without Fibromyalgia.

Given fibromyalgia (FM) frequently co-occurs with autoimmune disease, this study was initiated to objectively evaluate FM in a multiracial/ethnic cohort of patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Patients with SLE were screened for FM using the 2016 FM classification criteria during an in-person rheumatologist visit. We evaluated hybrid Safety of Estrogens in Lupus National Assessment (SELENA)-SLE Disease Activity Index (SLEDAI) scores, SLE classification criteria, and Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics damage index. We compared patients with and without FM and if differences were present, compared patients with FM with patients with non-FM related chronic pain. 316 patients with SLE completed the FM questionnaire. 55 (17.4%) met criteria for FM. The racial composition of patients with FM differed from those without FM (P = 0.023), driven by fewer Asian patients having FM. There was no difference in SLE disease duration, SELENA-SLEDAI score, or active serologies. There was more active arthritis in the FM group (16.4%) versus the non-FM group (1.9%) (P < 0.001). The Widespread Pain Index and Symptom Severity Score did not correlate with degree of SLE activity (r = -0.016; 0.107) among patients with FM or non-FM chronic pain (r = 0.009; -0.024). Regarding criteria, patients with FM had less nephritis and more malar rash. Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics damage index did not differ between groups. Except for arthritis, patients with SLE with FM are not otherwise clinically or serologically distinguishable from those without FM, and Widespread Pain Index and Symptom Severity Score indices do not correlate with SLEDAI. These observations support the importance of further understanding the underlying biology of FM in SLE.

New-onset Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Manifestation Following COVID-19: A Case Report and Literature Review.

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is a respiratory viral disease, and several cases of autoimmune diseases have been reported after infection. This report presents the case of a 38-year-old Japanese woman who developed systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) following COVID-19. Clinical manifestations included dermatological complications, joint pain, and positive autoantibodies. The patient met the SLE classification criteria, and renal involvement was observed. Her symptoms improved with immunosuppressive therapy. A literature review identified 10 similar cases, those with lymphopenia and renal involvement. SLE should be considered in patients with persistent nonspecific symptoms after COVID-19 infection, particularly when hematologic and renal involvement are present.

Prevalence and Characteristics of Patients With Systemic Sclerosis Fulfilling the 2019 EULAR/American College of Rheumatology Classification Criteria for Systemic Lupus Erythematosus.

There is limited literature describing the overlap of systemic sclerosis (SSc) and systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), and the studies have employed a range of case definitions. Our study used the new EULAR/American College of Rheumatology (ACR) SLE classification criteria to define SSc-SLE cases among our center's SSc cohort. This is a single-center, retrospective study of a previously described cohort of patients with SSc. Patient data were re-abstracted to evaluate for fulfillment of the 2019 EULAR/ACR classification criteria for SLE. Demographic, laboratory, clinical features, and mortality were compared among patients with SSc-SLE and patients with SSc alone. Among the 402 patients with SSc that were analyzed, 40 (10%) fulfilled the 2019 EULAR/ACR SLE classification criteria. Neuropsychiatric and renal involvement were rare. An initial SLE diagnosis was purported in 43% of the patients with SSc-SLE and 7% of patients with SSc alone (P < 0.001). Patients with SSc-SLE were more likely to be female, African American, and with limited cutaneous SSc. Anti-U1-RNP antibody positivity prevalence was 30% among patients with SSc-SLE and 6.6% among patients with SSc alone (P < 0.001). Death during follow-up occurred in 12 patients (30%) with SSc-SLE and in 81 patients (22%) with SSc alone, but there was no difference in survival among the groups per log rank test (P = 0.404). Ten percent of patients with SSc fulfill the 2019 EULAR/ACR classification criteria for SLE. These patients comprise a distinct demographic, serologic, and clinical phenotype but have similar severe SSc-specific end-organ damage and mortality as patients with SSc alone. Patients with SLE with Raynaud phenomenon should be evaluated for SSc-specific autoantibodies and scleroderma organ involvement.

A large cohort comparison of very late-onset systemic lupus erythematosus with younger-onset patients.

Age has a significant impact on systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). However, data on very late-onset SLE (vlSLE) are scarce. We have compared the clinical and serological features of vlSLE patients with younger-onset patients. We assessed the clinical and laboratory data of all patients fulfilling SLE classification criteria evaluated at a university hospital from 1978 to 2023. Patients were divided into 4 groups according to age at diagnosis: juvenile SLE (jSLE <8 years); adult SLE (aSLE 18-49 years); late SLE (lSLE 50-59 years); vlSLE (≥60 years). 845 patients were enrolled. The jSLE, aSLE, lSLE, and vlSLE groups included 153, 630, 47, and 15 patients, respectively. The vlSLE group tended to have a lower female-to-male ratio (4:1; p=0.282), was mainly Caucasian (93.3%; p<0.001), and had the lowest survival time (20.3 years; p<0.001). vlSLE patients had the lowest prevalence of positive anti-dsDNA antibodies (26.7%; p=0.010) and low C3 levels (13.3%; p<0.001). Although arthritis was less common among vlSLE patients (73.3%; p=0.043), they more commonly developed Sjögren's syndrome (SS 33.3%; p<0.001) and rheumatoid arthritis (RA 13.3%; p<0.001). Infections and malignancy were the main causes of death. Compared with younger patients, in vlSLE, female predominance is less pronounced. Arthritis, anti-dsDNA antibodies and low C3 levels are less frequent. SS and RA are more common. Despite lower disease activity, vlSLE patients have the lowest survival rate. While uncommon, SLE should not be excluded as a possible diagnosis in the elderly.

Comparative assessment of sensitivity and specificity of three variants of classification criteria for systemic lupus erythematosus in a cohort of Russian patients

The clinical and serologic heterogeneity of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) presents challenges for diagnosis, particularly in the earliest stages of the disease when there are insufficient signs to make a reliable diagnosis. To make a comparative assessment of sensitivity and specificity of various classification criteria of SLE on a cohort of patients of Nasonova Research Institute of Rheumatology. A total of 252 patients were included in the study; 152 (60%) of 252 patients had reliable SLE (mean age 36 [29.5-46] years, duration of disease 9 [3.4-19] years). Of 252 patients, 26 (11%) had PAPS (mean age 36.5 [31-42] years, duration of disease 4.6 [1-10.4] years). Systemic sclerosis was diagnosed in 74/252 (29%) patients, (mean age 51.5 [42-59] years, duration of disease 9 [5-16] years). The quality of the classification function of the criteria was assessed by ROC analysis. SLE was diagnosed in 131 (86%) of 152 patients using the American College of Rheumatology - ACR)-1997 criteria, in 145 (95%) using the The Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics (SLICC) 2012 criteria, and in 144 (94.7%) using the European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR)/ACR 2019 criteria. ANF positivity was the least statistically significant of all signs in relation to the diagnosis of SLE. The area under the curve (AUC) for ANF≥1/160 titers was AUC 0.654 for the ACR-97 criteria, AUC 0.616 for the SLICC-12 SLE criteria, and AUC 0.609 for the 2019 EULAR/ACR criteria. ROC analysis of the relationship between the number of criteria/points and a reliable diagnosis of SLE revealed a high diagnostic accuracy - the AUC for all SLE criteria was greater than 0.940. In the ROC analysis of patients with SLE and PAFS, indicating the number of diagnostic criteria, sensitivity was 86% for ACR-1997, 95% for SLICC-2012, 95% for EULAR/ACR 2019, and specificity was 100, 62 and 62%, respectively. The classification criteria SLICC-2012 and EULAR/ACR 2019 are more sensitive for the diagnosis of SLE in the Russian population, and the criteria ACR-1997 are more specific. All three variants of the SLE classification criteria have sufficient sensitivity and specificity for their use in real clinical practice.

Clinical efficacy of belimumab in central nervous system demyelinating syndromes with systemic lupus erythematosus: A case series.

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a complex autoimmune disease involving multiple systems. Central nervous system (CNS) demyelinating syndromes are one of the rare neurological manifestations of SLE, whose diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis are rarely reported. Belimumab, an anti-BAFF monoclonal antibody, has been approved by the FDA for the treatment of SLE. We aimed to assess the effects of belimumab on demyelinating syndromes in patients with SLE. Six patients with demyelination in SLE who were managed at Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine Hospital of Wuhan from March 2021 to March 2023, who received belimumab ≥ 5 times, were enrolled. Ten age- and sex-matched SLE patients with noutneuropsychiatric systemic lupus erythematosus (NPSLE) and normal controls were recruited to analyze potential biomarkers. All patients were diagnosed with SLE based on the 2012 Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics (SLICC) SLE classification criteria or the 2019 EULAR/ACR classification criteria. All SLE patients with CNS demyelinating syndromes were diagnosed by rheumatologists, neurologists, and radiologists. These patients were administered belimumab combined with standard treatment (glucocorticoids and/or antimalarials and/or immunosuppressants [cyclophosphamide, mycophenolate, methotrexate, etc.]). Six patients were included in the study (100% female, mean [range] age at first demyelinating episode 42.8 [24-66] years). The most common extra-CNS features in these patients were rash, arthritis, alopecia, leukopenia, and hypocomplementemia. After Belimumab treatment, 3 of 6 (50%) patients achieved complete remission with decreased prednisone, 2 improvements, and 1 relapsed with uterine surgery. Compared with the baseline, 3.5 months post belimumab treatment, the disease activity score SLEDAI (21.5-5.5, P < .001), C3 and C4 increased, and extra-CNS symptoms improved rapidly. Moreover, The expression of lupus susceptibility gene PBX1 in CD19+ B cells was lowest in demyelinating syndromes with lupus patients compared with healthy volunteers and lupus patients without demyelination, and its relative expression negatively correlated with SLE disease activity. Belimumab could be an effective and safe option for the treatment of SLE demyelination. In addition, PBX1 might be a potential biomarker for the clinical diagnosis of lupus in patients with demyelinating syndrome.

Serological and clinical associations of autoantibodies in Chinese patients with new-onset systemic lupus erythematosus

To study the clinical significance of autoantibodies in Chinese patients with new-onset systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), we enrolled 526 new-onset patients who met the 1997 Updated American College of Rheumatology SLE Classification Criteria for a retrospective cohort study. Chi-square test and Wilcoxon rank-sum test were used to detect the relationship of autoantibodies with clinical manifestations and serological results respectively. Our results demonstrated that the positive rate of anti-ribosomal P protein (anti-P) antibody in female patients was higher than that in male patients (41.2% vs. 22%, P = 0.008). Patients with anti-SSB (43.95 ± 73.12 vs. 40.92 ± 75.75, P = 0.004; 63.93 ± 103.56 vs. 55.06 ± 120.84, P = 0.008 respectively) antibodies had higher levels of alanine aminotransferase (ALT) and aspartate transaminase (AST), whereas those with anti-P antibody (28.90 ± 25.70 vs. 50.08 ± 93.00, P = 0.014; 38.51 ± 48.19 vs. 69.95 ± 142.67, P = 0.047, respectively) had lower levels of them. Anti-dsDNA antibody (P = 0.021) was associated with pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). The patients with anti-Ro60 (P = 0.044), anti-P (P = 0.012) and anti-dsDNA (P = 0.013) antibodies were less likely to develop Interstitial lung disease. Anti-SmRNP antibody was correlated to lower prevalence of neuropsychiatric symptoms (P = 0.037), and patients with anti-centromere antibody (ACA) were more likely to develop serositis (P = 0.016).We identified five clusters of SLE-related autoantibodies, confirmed previously reported associations of autoantibodies, and discovered new associations.

Serum proteome and metabolome uncover novel biomarkers for the assessment of disease activity and diagnosing of systemic lupus erythematosus

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is an autoimmune disease affecting thousands of people. There are still no effective biomarkers for SLE diagnosis and disease activity assessment. We performed proteomics and metabolomics analyses of serum from 121 SLE patients and 106 healthy individuals, and identified 90 proteins and 76 metabolites significantly changed. Several apolipoproteins and the metabolite arachidonic acid were significantly associated with disease activity. Apolipoprotein A-IV (APOA4), LysoPC(16:0), punicic acid and stearidonic acid were correlated with renal function. Random forest model using the significantly changed molecules identified 3 proteins including ATRN, THBS1 and SERPINC1, and 5 metabolites including cholesterol, palmitoleoylethanolamide, octadecanamide, palmitamide and linoleoylethanolamide, as potential biomarkers for SLE diagnosis. Those biomarkers were further validated in an independent cohort with high accuracy (AUC = 0.862 and 0.898 for protein and metabolite biomarkers respectively). This unbiased screening has led to the discovery of novel molecules for SLE disease activity assessment and SLE classification.

The impact of normal serum complement levels on the disease classification and clinical characteristics in systemic lupus erythematosus

BackgroundSome patients have normal levels of complement during the diagnosis of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), although decreased serum levels of complement are a hallmark of the active phase of the disease. This study investigated the clinical characteristics, impact on the classification of SLE, and the prognosis of patients with SLE who had normal serum complement levels at initial diagnosis (N-com).MethodsWe evaluated 21 patients with N-com and 96 patients with hypocomplementemia at the initial diagnosis of SLE (H-com). The classification rates among the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 1997, Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics (SLICC) 2012, European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR)/ACR 2019 criteria, and clinical and immunological involvements were compared between SLE patients with N-com and H-com. Relapse and organ damage based on the SLICC/ACR damage index were also evaluated.ResultsThe classification rates of SLE were not significantly different in the ACR, SLICC, and EULAR/ACR criteria between the N-com and H-com groups. Patients with N-com had no significant differences in the classification rates among the three criteria, whereas patients with H-com had lower classification rates in the ACR criteria than in the SLICC criteria. A lower incidence of renal manifestation, less positivity for anti-dsDNA antibody, and a higher incidence of fever were observed in patients with N-com than in those with H-com. The occurrence of relapse and organ damage was not significantly different between patients with N-com and H-com.ConclusionPatients with N-com were less involved in renal manifestation and anti-dsDNA antibody positivity but had a higher incidence of fever than those with H-com, while having no disadvantage in SLE classification processes. Serum complement levels at the initial diagnosis of SLE may not predict prognosis.

Classification of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Using Raman Spectroscopy of Blood and Automated Computational Detection Methods: A Novel Tool for Future Diagnostic Testing.

The aim of this study was to explore the proof of concept for using Raman spectroscopy as a diagnostic platform in the setting of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). We sought to identify unique Raman signatures in serum blood samples to successfully segregate SLE patients from healthy controls (HC). In addition, a retrospective audit was undertaken to assess the clinical utility of current testing platforms used to detect anti-double stranded DNA (dsDNA) antibodies (n = 600). We examined 234 Raman spectra to investigate key variances between SLE patients (n = 8) and HC (n = 4). Multi-variant analysis and classification model construction was achieved using principal component analysis (PCA), PCA-linear discriminant analysis and partial least squares-discriminant analysis (PLS-DA). We achieved the successful segregation of Raman spectra from SLE patients and healthy controls (p-value &lt; 0.0001). Classification models built using PLS-DA demonstrated outstanding performance characteristics with 99% accuracy, 100% sensitivity and 99% specificity. Twelve statistically significant (p-value &lt; 0.001) wavenumbers were identified as potential diagnostic spectral markers. Molecular assignments related to proteins and DNA demonstrated significant Raman intensity changes between SLE and HC groups. These wavenumbers may serve as future biomarkers and offer further insight into the pathogenesis of SLE. Our audit confirmed previously reported inconsistencies between two key methodologies used to detect anti-dsDNA, highlighting the need for improved laboratory testing for SLE. Raman spectroscopy has demonstrated powerful performance characteristics in this proof-of-concept study, setting the foundations for future translation into the clinical setting.

Pulmonary Involvement in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Patients in a Tertiary Care Hospital.

In half of the individuals with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), over the course of the disease, pulmonary involvement occurs frequently and is one of the parts in the array of presenting symptoms. But the published research and information on SLE have historically concentrated on renal, central nervous system (CNS), and dermatological manifestations, while the pulmonary effects of SLE have received very less attention. To know the extent and pattern of pulmonary involvement in SLE patients in a tertiary care hospital. A cross-sectional observational study was conducted among 70 diagnosed SLE [who fulfilled the revised American College of Rheumatology (ACR) criteria for the classification of SLE] patients attending a tertiary care center. Seventy diagnosed SLE patients who met the updated ACR criteria for the classification of SLE and were enrolled in a tertiary care facility in West Bengal participated in a cross-sectional observational study. After informed consent, clinical examinations, general survey, respiratory examination, cardiovascular examination, and relevant investigations [chest X-ray, pulmonary function test, echocardiography and electrocardiography, and high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT)/chest computed tomography (CT) scan] were performed. The majority of the study subjects belonged to the 21-30 years of age-group (45.7%) and were females. Most of the study subjects were treatment-naïve as they were newly diagnosed. Among the chief presenting complaints, the most common was cough followed by dyspnea and pleuritic chest pain. Chest X-rays showed pleural pathology in 37% of study subjects and pulmonary function tests were found to have a restrictive pattern in 4.3%. Echocardiography documented that 19.6% had pulmonary artery hypertension. HRCT revealed that 19.4% of subjects had definitive findings of interstitial lung diseases (ILD). A substantial contributor to morbidity and death, SLE is a potentially fatal, commonly debilitating autoimmune illness with pulmonary symptoms. Cough was the most common presenting complaint, and the most common radiological abnormality detected was pleural effusion. Spirometry revealed, as expected, a restrictive pattern in most of the cases. Around 29% of cases revealed features suggestive of or confirmatory evidence for intestinal lung disease. As a whole, the prevalence of lung involvement in SLE in the study was 67%. But this being a study with only 70 participants, a further longitudinal is recommended to study disease activity correlation with the incidence of early pulmonary involvement in SLE disease course.

Glucocorticoid tapering and associated outcome in patients with newly diagnosed systemic lupus erythematosus: the real-world GULP prospective observational study

ObjectiveA subanalysis of the multicentre Early Lupus inception cohort was performed to investigate the real-world Glucocorticoids (GCs) Use in newly diagnosed systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) Patients (GULP).MethodsPatients starting prednisone (PDN)...

Performance of the New 2019 European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology/American College of Rheumatology Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Classification Criteria in a Large Unicentric Cohort.

The recently published 2019 American College of Rheumatology/European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology (ACR/EULAR) classification criteria for systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) were developed to increase the reliability and identification of SLE, especially in early disease. With the emergence of several new drugs for SLE, identifying and treating patients early are more important than ever. Data of 446 SLE patients evaluated in our center between 1996-2019 and 226 controls with other autoimmune diseases evaluated between 2001-2022 were retrospectively analyzed. The sensitivity and specificity of the 2019 ACR/EULAR criteria were compared to the 2012 SLICC and the 1997 ACR criteria. The 2019 ACR/EULAR criteria showed very good sensitivity (86.6%) compared to the 1997 ACR criteria (76.7%), p &lt; 0.001, with a trend toward significance compared to the 2012 SLICC criteria (83.6%), p = 0.072. Their sensitivity remained high (87.6%) in patients with a short disease duration. The specificity of the 2019 ACR/EULAR criteria (91.2%) was statistically lower than the 2012 SLICC (96.0%) and 1997 ACR criteria (95.1%), p = 0.007 and p = 0.012, respectively, but still had a very high value. A total of 22 controls (9.7%) fulfilled at least one set of criteria (15 patients with MCTD, 5 with UCTD, and 2 with SSc). In this large real-life cohort, the 2019 ACR/EULAR criteria had very good performance compared to the 2012 SLICC and 1997 ACR criteria.

Evaluating the Threshold Score for Classification of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Using the EULAR/ACR Criteria.

To evaluate whether a change in the European Alliance of Associations for Rheumatology (EULAR)/American College of Rheumatology (ACR) systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) classification criteria threshold score affects accurate classification of SLE cases compared to disease-based control subjects. We evaluated a range of threshold scores to determine the score that maximizes the accurate classification of early SLE. We conducted a cross-sectional study comparing SLE cases and control patients. A EULAR/ACR criteria score was calculated using baseline information. Sensitivity, specificity, positive likelihood ratios (+LRs), and negative likelihood ratios (-LRs) with 95% CIs were used to evaluate operating characteristics. Threshold scores of 6 to 12 were evaluated in subjects with early disease (ie, disease duration of ≤ 5 years). +LRs > 10 and -LRs < 0.1 provide evidence to rule in or rule out SLE. A total of 2764 patients were included: 1980 SLE cases who fulfilled either the ACR or Systemic Lupus International Collaborating Clinics criteria and 784 control subjects. The EULAR/ACR SLE criteria had a sensitivity of 98% (95% CI 97-98), a specificity of 99% (95% CI 98-100), a +LR of 95.5 (95% CI 48.0-190), and a -LR 0.03 (95% CI 0.02-0.03). The criteria operated well in those with early disease, in women, in men, and in White, Black, Chinese, and Filipino people. A score of 10 maximized the accurate classification of patients with early disease (+LR 174.4, 95% CI 43.8-694.6; -LR 0.03, 95% CI 0.02-0.04). An increase in the threshold score from 10 to 11 resulted in significant worsening in the -LR (threshold score 10: -LR 0.03, 95% CI 0.02-0.03 vs threshold score 11: -LR 0.05, 95% CI 0.04-0.06). The EULAR/ACR SLE classification criteria threshold score of 10 performs well, particularly among those with early disease and across sexes and ethnicities.