Classification Of Rhabdomyosarcoma Research Articles

Pathology of childhood rhabdomyosarcoma: A consensus opinion document from the Children's Oncology Group, European Paediatric Soft Tissue Sarcoma Study Group, and the Cooperative Weichteilsarkom Studiengruppe.

The diagnosis and classification of rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) has undergone several shifts over the last 30years. While the main diagnostic categories remained the same, changes in the histologic criteria necessary for diagnosis, as well as varied reliance on immunohistochemical and molecular data over time, have created confusion, particularly regarding how these shifts impacted risk stratification and enrollment onto clinical trials. The goal of this report is to review the evolution and current status of RMS diagnosis, focusing on diagnostic criteria in the Children's Oncology Group (COG), the European Paediatric Soft Tissue Sarcoma Group (EpSSG), and the Cooperative Weichteilsarkom Studiengruppe (CWS). In addition, we emphasize research tools used to classify RMS and address biological questions within current clinical trials run by each group. The INternational Soft Tissue SaRcoma ConsorTium (INSTRuCT) initiative will maximize potential to optimize risk stratification by recognizing and accounting for differences in historical data and current practices.

Classification of rhabdomyosarcoma and its molecular basis.

Rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS), the most common soft tissue sarcoma in children, has traditionally been classified into embryonal rhabdomyosarcoma (ERMS) and alveolar rhabdomyosarcoma (ARMS) for pediatric oncology practice. This review outlines the historical development of classification of childhood RMS and the challenges that have been associated with it, particularly problems with the diagnosis of "solid variant" ARMS and its distinction from ERMS. In addition to differences in clinical presentation and outcome, a number of genetic features underpin separation of ERMS from ARMS. Genetic differences associated with RMS subclassification include the presence of reciprocal translocations and their associated fusions in ARMS, amplification of genes in ARMS and its fusion subsets, chromosomal losses and gains that mostly occur in ERMS, and allelic losses and mutations usually associated with ERMS. Chimeric proteins encoded in most ARMS from the fusion of PAX3 or PAX7 with FOXO1 are expressed, result in a distinct pattern of downstream protein expression, and appear to be the proximate cause of the bad outcome associated with this subtype. A sizeable minority of ARMS lacks these fusions and shares the clinical and biological features of ERMS. A battery of immunohistochemical tests may prove useful in separating ERMS from ARMS and fusion-positive ARMS from fusion-negative ARMS. Because of limitation of predicting outcome solely based on histologic classification, treatment protocols will begin to utilize fusion testing for stratification of affected patients into low-risk, intermediate-risk, and high-risk groups.

Diagnosis and Classification of the Small Round-Cell Tumors of Childhood

The small-round-cell tumors of childhood include neuroblastoma, the Ewing family of tumors, rhabdomyosarcoma, lymphoma, and desmoplastic small-round-cell tumor. Although classical histological features are generally highly suggestive of tumor type, on occasion these tumors may be indistinguishable by light microscopy, making a definitive diagnosis difficult. Accurate diagnosis of pediatric small-round-cell tumors has become increasingly crucial, as disparate approaches to therapy are used for distinct tumor types. In addition, because for many pediatric cancers, therapy is also tailored according to patient risk, it has become important to further classify tumors biologically, using cytogenetic or molecular studies to identify chromosome translocations, gene amplification, gene expression patterns, and/or mutations. In this issue of The American Journal of Pathology, Gilbert and colleagues used a reverse transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) assay to analyze the expression of two genes involved in the catecholamine biosynthetic pathway, tyrosine hydoxylase and dopa decarboxylase, in 84 pediatric malignancies. 1 Their studies demonstrate that the expression of these two genes is highly specific for neuroblastoma. Of the 29 non-neuroblastoma tumor samples examined, only pheochromocytomas expressed clearly detectable levels of the genes. These results suggest that analysis of tyrosine hydoxylase and dopa decarboxylase expression may help distinguish neuroblastoma from other small-round-cell childhood tumors. Despite recent advances in immunohistochemistry and molecular pathology, some cases of small-round-cell tumors of childhood remain diagnostically problematic. Thus, additional diagnostic tools, such as the ones described by Gilbert and co-workers, are needed to ensure that every child with a small-round-cell tumor is diagnosed correctly. The value and limitations of current immunohistochemical, cytogenetic, and molecular studies as diagnostic aids for the small-round-cell tumors of childhood are highlighted below.

The New International Rhabdomyosarcoma Classification, Its Progenitors, and Considerations beyond Morphology

The New International Rhabdomyosarcoma Classification, Its Progenitors, and Considerations beyond Morphology

Classification of rhabdomyosarcomas and related sarcomas: W.A. Newton, Jr, E.A. Gehan, B.L. Webber, et al. Cancer 76:1073–1085, (September), 1995

Classification of rhabdomyosarcomas and related sarcomas: W.A. Newton, Jr, E.A. Gehan, B.L. Webber, et al. Cancer 76:1073–1085, (September), 1995

Classification of rhabdomyosarcoma.

Lesions now classified as rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) in children are as a rule comprised of very primitive cells which do not show obvious features of fully developed muscle. It is not surprising that the early attempts to classify this group of tumors focused upon tumors that showed some recognizable features of skeletal muscle such as cross-striations. Stout (1946) gave credit to Weber as the first to describe such a tumor in 1854 in his classical description of RMS of the skeletal muscles. Weber described a patient who had a protruding tongue for several years that developed an obvious tumor mass about the size of a hand when it was removed at 21 years of age. The tissue consisted of small round or oval cells or nuclei with only scanty cytoplasm. A large proportion of the cells showed cross-striations. The conclusion of that author was that these cells were growing normal muscle fibers which were in different stages of development. He compared the microscopic appearance of these cells to those of a 4-5-month-old human embryo, but could not explain the tumor cells with scanty cytoplasm. He believed that these tumor cells developed out of inflammatory exudate which was found in the area of the excision. In retrospect, there can be little doubt that this was a neoplasm which would be diagnosed as an RMS today; it had enough cross-striations present to recognize that the tumors cells had a skeletal muscle origin.

Agreement among and within groups of pathologists in the classification of rhabdomyosarcoma and related childhood sarcomas. Report of an international study of four pathology classifications.

An International Pathology study was conducted to measure the agreement demonstrated among and within groups of pathologists involved in the categorization of childhood rhabdomyosarcoma according to four pathology classifications. Data concerning agreement and survival experience according to patho-new subtypes were used as a basis for selection of a proposed new pathologic classification. A random sample of 800 eligible patients was chosen from the Intergroup Rhabdomyosarcoma Study II (IRS-II) and was reviewed by pathologists representing eight institutions. A 20% sample of the 800 patients was then reviewed by the pathologists to determine the level of agreement with their original classification. In each instance the patients were classified according to four pathology systems: the conventional system, the International Society for Pediatric Oncology system (SIOP), the National Cancer Institute (NCI) system, and the cytohistologic system. Among the groups of pathologists, the highest measure of agreement was a Kappa value of K = 0.451 for the conventional system, followed by K = 0.406 for the SIOP system, K = 0.384 for the NCI system, and K = 0.328 for the cytohistologic system. For reproducibility within the groups of pathologists, the highest measure of agreement was K = 0.605 for the conventional system, followed by K = 0.579 for the NCI system, K = 0.573 for the SIOP system, and K = 0.508 for the cytohistologic system. There was a general similarity between the agreement reached within the modified conventional, STOP, and NCI systems, with the modified conventional system having the highest Kappa values, and thus the highest measure of agreement, both among and within the groups of pathologists. Also, the subtypes of the conventional system demonstrated a highly significant relationship to survival time. Hence, based on criteria of reproducibilty and prognostic significance, the proposed classification will essentially be a modification of the conventional system with elements of the SIOP and NCI systems.