Classification Of Muscle Injuries Research Articles

Lesão Aguda do Músculo Longo Adutor num Jogador de Futebol Profissional

Acute injury to the adductor muscle is common in football players, has a good prognosis and causes fewer days of absence from sports compared to injuries to other muscle groups. An acute injury causes intense pain and requires immediate sports cessation. The diagnosis is clinical and is supported by magnetic resonance imaging, which is considered the exam of reference. In this text we describe the clinical case of a right-handed professional football player, who suffered an injury to the left adductor longus muscle, classified as 2b (British classification of muscle injuries). Multidisciplinary and player involvement, application of load to the muscle from the beginning and respect for pain throughout the process allowed the player to participate in an official football game nine days after the injury.

Epidemiology of MRI-detected muscle injury in athletes participating in the Tokyo 2020 Olympic Games

ObjectiveMuscle injury is one of the most common injuries occurring at the Olympic Games often with devastating consequences. Epidemiological injury surveillance is recognised by the IOC as essential for injury...

Role of ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging in the prognosis and classification of muscle injuries in professional football players: correlation between imaging and return to sport time

PurposeTo study distractive muscle injuries applying US and MRI specific classifications and to find if any correlation exists between the results and the return to sport (RTS) time. The second purpose is to evaluate which classification has the best prognostic value and if the lesions extension correlates with the RTS time.MethodsA total of 26 male, professional soccer players (age 21.3 ± 5.6), diagnosed with traumatic muscle injury of the lower limbs, received ultrasound and MRI evaluation within 2 days from the trauma. Concordance between US and MRI findings was investigated. The relationships between MRI and US based injury grading scales and RTS time were evaluated. Correlation between injuries’ longitudinal extension and RTS time was also investigated.ResultsThe correlation between US and MRI measurements returned a Spearman value of rs = 0.61 (p = .001). Peetrons and Mueller-Wohlfahrt grading scales correlations with RTS time were r = 0.43 (p = .02) and r = 0.83 (p = < .001). The lesion’s extension correlation with RTS time was r = 0.63 (p < .001). The correlation between the site of the lesion and its location with the RTS time were rs = 0.2 and rs = 0.25.ConclusionsBoth US and MRI can be used as prognostic indicators along with the Peetrons (US) and the Mueller-Wohlfahrt (MRI) classifications. MRI is more precise and generates more reproducible results. The lesion craniocaudal extension must be considered as a prognostic indicator, while the injury location inside the muscle or along its major axis has doubtful significance.

Muscle tear: innovation in the classification and imagenological approach of sports muscle injuries

Muscle tear: innovation in the classification and imagenological approach of sports muscle injuries

A Histoarchitectural Approach to Skeletal Muscle Injury: Searching for a Common Nomenclature.

In recent years, different classifications for muscle injuries have been proposed based on the topographic location of the injury within the bone-tendon-muscle chain. We hereby propose that in addition to the topographic classification of muscle injuries, a histoarchitectonic (description of the damage to connective tissue structures) definition of the injury be included within the nomenclature. Thus, the nomenclature should focus not only on the macroscopic anatomy but also on the histoarchitectonic features of the injury.

Italian consensus conference on guidelines for conservative treatment on lower limb muscle injuries in athlete

Provide the state of the art concerning (1) biology and aetiology, (2) classification, (3) clinical assessment and (4) conservative treatment of lower limb muscle injuries (MI) in athletes. Seventy international...

Diagnostics and classification of muscle injuries in sports

Muscle injuries are responsible for up to one third of the musculoskeletal injuries occuring in professional football and summer Olympic Games. Classifying injuries has the objective to define the extent, to predict the time-loss, and potentially to suggest a treatment plan to optimize the return to sport and prevent from re-injury. Most recent classification systems have integrated patient’s history, clinical examination, and diagnostic imaging, to describe severity and therefore time-loss. The different aspects and the most frequently used classification systems are discussed with special regard their validity to predict return to sport.

Classification of Muscle Injuries: A Misunderstanding?

Classification of Muscle Injuries: A Misunderstanding?

Terminology and classification of muscle injuries in sport: The Munich consensus statement

ObjectiveTo provide a clear terminology and classification of muscle injuries in order to facilitate effective communication among medical practitioners and development of systematic treatment strategies.MethodsThirty native English-speaking scientists and team...

Musculus-pectoralis-major-Rupturen: Verletzungsklassifikation und Ergebnisse der operativen Versorgung

Classification of pectoralis major muscle injuries and results of operative treatment in the Sportsklinik Stuttgart between 1998 and 2004 are analysed. 10 sportsmen (2 judo, 8 body-building; 9 male, 1 female) with pectoralis major ruptures received operative treatment in this time period. After clinical examination we used ultrasound, in some cases MRI, for further diagnostics. The follow-up (1-5 years) included a clinical examination, ultrasound, sports level, cosmetics and an isokinetic strength assessment. In 4 cases we found a tear of the musculotendinous junction, 4 cases showed a tear at the humeral insertion and 2 other cases had tears of the muscle belly. There was no sports-specific injury. 6 ruptures underwent immediate (1 week) operative therapy and 4 ruptures had delayed (6 weeks to 4 years) repair of the injury. In 9 cases an anatomic repair was possible, in 1 delayed rupture only an extra-anatomic repair was possible. We had 1 complication with a post-operative wound infection. Based on injury localisation and operative treatment, we classified 3 types of pectoralis major ruptures. The follow-up evaluation showed in 7 cases very good and good results, 2 delayed cases still had a cosmetic defect with reduction of strength. From our results on pectoralis major muscle injuries there are 3 types of rupture: type 1: rupture at humeral insertion, type 2: rupture of musculotendinous junction, type 3: rupture of muscle belly. This classification is essential for planning the operative technique and the incision. We recommend, after classification of the rupture, primary operative reconstruction of the pectoralis major muscle.