Classification Criteria For Vasculitis Research Articles

Vasculitis associated with VEXAS syndrome: A literature review

Vasculitis is an inflammatory disorder of the blood vessels that causes damage to a wide variety of organs through tissue ischemia. Vasculitis is classified according to the size (large, medium, or small) of the blood vessels. In 2020, VEXAS (vacuoles, E1 enzyme, X-linked, autoinflammatory, somatic) syndrome, a novel autoinflammatory syndrome, was described. Somatic mutations in methionine-41 of UBA1, the major E1 enzyme that initiates ubiquitylation, are attributed to this disorder. This new disease entity connects seemingly unrelated conditions: inflammatory syndromes (relapsing chondritis, Sweet's syndrome, or neutrophilic dermatosis) and hematologic disorders (myelodysplastic syndrome or multiple myeloma). Notably, such patients sometimes develop vasculitis, such as giant cell arteritis and polyarteritis nodosa, and fulfill the corresponding classification criteria for vasculitis. Thus, vasculitis can be an initial manifestation of VEXAS syndrome. In this research topic exploring the link between autoinflammatory diseases and vasculitis, we first provide an overview of the disease mechanisms and clinical phenotypes of VEXAS syndrome. Then, a literature review using the PubMed database was performed to delineate the clinical characteristics of vasculitis associated with VEXAS syndrome. Finally, the therapeutic options and unmet needs of VEXAS syndrome are discussed.

Classification of systemic vasculitis: evolution from eponyms to modern criteria

Systemic vasculitis is a manifold group of systemic autoimmune diseases characterized by the inflammation of the blood vessels. The first clinical cases of systemic vasculitis were described in the Middle Ages, and most of the currently recognised nosological forms were reported in the first half of the 20th century. The first attempt to create a united classification of vasculitis was performed by P. Zeek in 1952. In the following decades accumulation of the data on the etiology and pathogenesis of different vasculitis guided researchers from different countries in their attempts to improve classification. The main principles of classification were the size of the affected blood vessels, disease etiology and pathogenesis. In 1990 American College of Rheumatology (ACR) published classification criteria for seven forms of the systemic vasculitis, that gave a significant contribution to the conduction of large-scale studies in this field. However, the first international nomenclature of vasculitis was developed only in 1994 during the Consensus Conference in Chapel Hill. Revised and augmented version of this nomenclature was created in 2012 and is still valid. An important step in the development of the classification of vasculitis was a joint project of ACR and EULAR aimed to develop new diagnostic and classification criteria for vasculitis (DCVAS). The first result of this project are the new classification criteria for granulomatosis with polyangiitis, microscopic polyangiitis and eosinophilic granulomatosis with polyangiitis published in 2022. In general, the evolution of the classification of vasculitis occurs under the influence of the progress in the understanding of their etiology and pathogenesis.

Patterns of Arterial Disease in Takayasu Arteritis and Giant Cell Arteritis.

To identify and validate, using computer-driven methods, patterns of arterial disease in Takayasu arteritis (TAK) and giant cell arteritis (GCA). Patients with TAK or GCA were studied from the Diagnostic and Classification Criteria for Vasculitis (DCVAS) cohort and a combined North American cohort. Case inclusion required evidence of large-vessel involvement, defined as stenosis, occlusion, or aneurysm by angiography/ultrasonography, or increased 18 F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) uptake by positron emission tomography (PET) in at least 1 of 11 specified arterial territories. K-means cluster analysis identified groups of patients based on the pattern of arterial involvement. Cluster groups were identified in the DCVAS cohort and independently validated in the North American cohort. A total of 1,068 patients were included (DCVAS cohort: TAK = 461, GCA = 217; North American cohort: TAK = 225, GCA = 165). Six distinct clusters of patients were identified in DCVAS and validated in the North American cohort. Patients with TAK were more likely to have disease in the abdominal vasculature, bilateral disease of the subclavian and carotid arteries, or focal disease limited to the left subclavian artery than GCA (P < 0.01). Patients with GCA were more likely to have diffuse disease, involvement of bilateral axillary/subclavian arteries, or minimal disease without a definable pattern than TAK (P < 0.01). Patients with TAK were more likely to have damage by angiography, and patients with GCA were more likely to have arterial FDG uptake by PET without associated vascular damage. Arterial patterns of disease highlight both shared and divergent vascular patterns between TAK and GCA and should be incorporated into classification criteria for large-vessel vasculitis.

Classification and classification criteria for vasculitis: achievements, limitations and prospects.

The classification of diseases reveals the relationships between conditions that are linked in some way. Such classification has been a challenge for vasculitis because of the heterogeneous and protean nature of the illnesses. Classification criteria are critical to homogenize patient populations with vasculitis who are included in basic and clinical research studies. The most recent advance in vasculitis classification has been the revised 2012 Chapel Hill Consensus Conference (CHCC) nomenclature of vasculitis that, although mainly focusing on nomenclature, also included classification elements. Whereas still maintaining the caliber of the predominantly involved vessels as the main categorization criterion for primary systemic vasculitis, the 2012 CHCC nomenclature introduced a new category--variable-vessel vasculitis--to include Behçet's disease and Cogan's syndrome in the vasculitis spectrum. Another important feature was the expansion of the classification to secondary vasculitis and single-organ vasculitis. Similarly, classification criteria for several vasculitis entities have been altered and new criteria published, namely for Behçet's disease and cryoglobulinemic vasculitis. The classification of vasculitis continues to be amended to account for advances in the general understanding of the nature of vasculitis and our ability to diagnose them. The relevance of the prevailing classification system, relying on affected vessel size as the primary discriminator of vasculitis entities, is still questionable for clinical practice. Clinically sound, widely accepted classification criteria are available for most vasculitis entities, although some areas remain ill-defined: polyarteritis nodosa, microscopic polyangiitis and adult immunoglobulin A vasculitis (Henoch-Schönlein).

FRI0464 Development of the Classification Criteria for GIANT Cell Arteritis in the Diagnostic and Classification Criteria for Vasculitis Study: A Pilot Study Using A Panel Review Methodology

BackgroundThe Diagnostic and Classification Criteria for Vasculitis (DCVAS) Study is a multinational observational study to develop diagnostic criteria and to update classification criteria for the primary systemic vasculitides. By 2015...

Classification of ANCA-Associated Vasculitis

Classification of the ANCA-associated vasculitides remains controversial. Existing systems, developed by the American College of Rheumatology (ACR) in 1990, the Chapel Hill Consensus Conference (CHCC) in 1994 and updated in 2012, and the European Medicines Agency algorithm, all have deficiencies, especially when applied to unselected patients. The ACR system did not include ANCA or microscopic polyangiitis, and the CHCC (1994) included MPA but not ANCA (this was rectified in the 2012 revision). These systems were developed as classification criteria and not as diagnostic criteria. There are currently no validated diagnostic criteria for AAV. The Diagnostic and Classification Criteria for Vasculitis (DCVAS) study is a global study with the objective of developing and validating diagnostic criteria.

ACR/EULAR-endorsed study to develop Diagnostic and Classification Criteria for Vasculitis (DCVAS)

The systemic vasculitides are a group of uncommon diseases characterized by blood vessel inflammation. There are currently no diagnostic criteria for the primary systemic vasculitides and physicians must rely on experience and disease definitions. The absence of validated criteria can result in delays in making the correct diagnosis and starting appropriate therapy. With the increased understanding of the pathophysiology of vasculitis and newer diagnostic tests in widespread clinical use, it is an appropriate time for classification criteria for primary vasculitis to be revised. The Diagnostic and Classification Criteria for Vasculitis (DCVAS) study is a multinational observational study designed to develop and validate diagnostic criteria and to improve and validate classification criteria for primary systemic vasculitis. The analytic approach will be based on the traditional approach of vessel size for classification of vasculitis but will also incorporate detailed clinical data, evaluation of anti-neutrophil cytoplasm antibody diagnostic testing, biopsy and imaging data. The study is following the guidelines for the development of classification criteria established by the American College of Rheumatology and the European League against Rheumatism. The study will incorporate the use of pre-defined cases of each condition to reduce the inherent circularity when developing new classification criteria and will explore alternative approaches to deriving reference standards by creating data-driven classification algorithms. We anticipate recruiting >2,000 patients with primary systemic vasculitis and 1,500 patients with autoimmune diseases and other conditions that mimic vasculitis. As of June 2013, >100 medical centers across 31 countries in Asia, Australasia, Europe, North America, and South America were contributing data to the study. The DCVAS study provides a unique opportunity to increase generalizability and collate a large dataset on the occurrence, presentation, and outcome of vasculitis in different populations.