tRNA Synthetase Classes Research Articles

X-shaped structure of bacterial heterotetrameric tRNA synthetase suggests cryptic prokaryote functions and a rationale for synthetase classifications.

AaRSs (aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases) group into two ten-member classes throughout evolution, with unique active site architectures defining each class. Most are monomers or homodimers but, for no apparent reason, many bacterial GlyRSs are heterotetramers consisting of two catalytic α-subunits and two tRNA-binding β-subunits. The heterotetrameric GlyRS from Escherichia coli (EcGlyRS) was historically tested whether its α- and β-polypeptides, which are encoded by a single mRNA with a gap of three in-frame codons, are replaceable by a single chain. Here, an unprecedented X-shaped structure of EcGlyRS shows wide separation of the abutting chain termini seen in the coding sequences, suggesting strong pressure to avoid a single polypeptide format. The structure of the five-domain β-subunit is unique across all aaRSs in current databases, and structural analyses suggest these domains play different functions on α-subunit binding, ATP coordination and tRNA recognition. Moreover, the X-shaped architecture of EcGlyRS largely fits with a model for how two classes of tRNA synthetases arose, according to whether enzymes from opposite classes can simultaneously co-dock onto separate faces of the same tRNA acceptor stem. While heterotetrameric GlyRS remains the last structurally uncharacterized member of aaRSs, our study contributes to a better understanding of this ancient and essential enzyme family.

Codon Directional Asymmetry Suggests Swapped Prebiotic 1st and 2nd Codon Positions.

Background: Codon directional asymmetry (CDA) classifies the 64 codons into palindromes (XYX, CDA = 0), and 5′- and 3′-dominant (YXX and XXY, CDA < 0 and CDA > 0, respectively). Previously, CDA was defined by the purine/pyrimidine divide (A,G/C,T), where X is either a purine or a pyrimidine. For the remaining codons with undefined CDA, CDA was defined by the 5′ or 3′ nucleotide complementary to Y. This CDA correlates with cognate amino acid tRNA synthetase classes, antiparallel beta sheet conformation index and the evolutionary order defined by the self-referential genetic code evolution model (CDA < 0: class I, high beta sheet index, late genetic code inclusion). Methods: We explore associations of CDAs defined by nucleotide classifications according to complementarity strengths (A:T, weak; C:G, strong) and keto-enol/amino-imino groupings (G,T/A,C), also after swapping 1st and 2nd codon positions with amino acid physicochemical and structural properties. Results: Here, analyses show that for the eight codons whose purine/pyrimidine-based CDA requires using the rule of complementarity with the midposition, using weak interactions to define CDA instead of complementarity increases associations with tRNA synthetase classes, antiparallel beta sheet index and genetic code evolutionary order. CDA defined by keto-enol/amino-imino groups, 1st and 2nd codon positions swapped, correlates with amino acid parallel beta sheet formation indices and Doolittle’s hydropathicities. Conclusions: Results suggest (a) prebiotic swaps from N2N1N3 to N1N2N3 codon structures, (b) that tRNA-mediated translation replaced direct codon-amino acid interactions, and (c) links between codon structures and cognate amino acid properties.

Bias for 3'-Dominant Codon Directional Asymmetry in Theoretical Minimal RNA Rings.

Aminoacyl tRNA synthetases ligate tRNAs specifically with their cognate amino acid. These synthetases are among life's earliest proteins, class II tRNA synthetases (cognates A, D, F, G, H, K, N, P, S, and T) presumably preceding class I tRNA synthetases (cognates C, E, I, L, M, Q, R, V, W, and Y). Classification of codons into palindromic (structure XYX), 5'-dominant (YXX), and 3'-dominant (XXY) (Codon Directional Asymmetry [CDA]) shows that class II tRNA synthetases aminoacylate amino acids associated with XXY. Our working hypothesis expects bias for XXY codons in primordial RNAs, such as theoretical minimal RNA rings, designed in silico to mimic life's earliest RNAs. Twenty-five RNA rings have been computed, which code over a minimal length (22 nucleotides) for a start codon, stop codon, and one and only one codon for each of the 20 amino acids, and form stem-loop hairpins preventing degradation; these 25 minimal RNAs are the only ones matching these constraints and they seem homologous to consensus tRNA sequences. This similarity defined candidate RNA ring anticodons and corresponding cognate amino acids. Here, analyses of RNA ring codon contents confirm bias for XXY codons in 13 among 14 RNA rings with unequal XXY and YXX codon numbers. This bias increases with the genetic code integration order of the RNA ring's cognate amino acid across and within tRNA synthetase classes, suggesting that evolutionary processes, and not physicochemical constraints, produced the association between CDA and tRNA synthetase classes. The self-referential hypothesis for genetic code origin, a very complete genetic code evolutionary hypothesis integrating many translational machinery components, predicts best among genetic code evolutionary hypotheses CDA biases in RNA rings. The RNA rings' simple design inadvertently reproduces CDAs predicted by the genetic code's structure, confirming theoretical minimal RNA rings as good proxies for life's earliest RNAs.

Genetic Code Optimization for Cotranslational Protein Folding: Codon Directional Asymmetry Correlates with Antiparallel Betasheets, tRNA Synthetase Classes

A new codon property, codon directional asymmetry in nucleotide content (CDA), reveals a biologically meaningful genetic code dimension: palindromic codons (first and last nucleotides identical, codon structure XZX) are symmetric (CDA=0), codons with structures ZXX/XXZ are 5′/3′ asymmetric (CDA=−1/1; CDA=−0.5/0.5 if Z and X are both purines or both pyrimidines, assigning negative/positive (−/+) signs is an arbitrary convention). Negative/positive CDAs associate with (a) Fujimoto's tetrahedral codon stereo-table; (b) tRNA synthetase class I/II (aminoacylate the 2′/3′ hydroxyl group of the tRNA's last ribose, respectively); and (c) high/low antiparallel (not parallel) betasheet conformation parameters. Preliminary results suggest CDA-whole organism associations (body temperature, developmental stability, lifespan). Presumably, CDA impacts spatial kinetics of codon-anticodon interactions, affecting cotranslational protein folding. Some synonymous codons have opposite CDA sign (alanine, leucine, serine, and valine), putatively explaining how synonymous mutations sometimes affect protein function. Correlations between CDA and tRNA synthetase classes are weaker than between CDA and antiparallel betasheet conformation parameters. This effect is stronger for mitochondrial genetic codes, and potentially drives mitochondrial codon-amino acid reassignments. CDA reveals information ruling nucleotide-protein relations embedded in reversed (not reverse-complement) sequences (5′-ZXX-3′/5′-XXZ-3′).

Detection of Functional Overlapping Genes: Simulation and Case Studies

As far as protein-coding genes are concerned, there is a non-zero probability that at least one of the five possible overlapping sequences of any gene will contain an open-reading frame (ORF) of a length that may be suitable for coding a functional protein. It is, however, very difficult to determine whether or not such an ORF is functional. Recently, we proposed a method that predicts functionality of an overlapping ORF if it can be shown that it has been subject to purifying selection during its evolution. Here, we use simulation to test this method under several conditions and compare it with the method of Firth and Brown. We found that under most conditions, our method detects functional overlapping genes with higher sensitivity than Firth and Brown's method, while maintaining high specificity. Further, we tested the hypothesis that the two aminoacyl tRNA synthetase classes have originated from a pair of overlapping genes. A central piece of evidence ostensibly supporting this hypothesis is the assertion that an overlapping ORF of a heat-shock protein-70 gene, which exhibits some similarity to class 2 aminoacyl tRNA synthetases, is functional. We found signature of purifying selection only in highly divergent sequences, suggesting that the method yields false-positives in high sequence divergence and that the overlapping ORF is not a functional gene. Finally, we examined three cases of overlap in the human genome. We find varying signatures of purifying selection acting on these overlaps, raising the possibility that two of the overlapping genes may not be functional.

No Rosetta Stone for a Sense–Antisense Origin of Aminoacyl tRNA Synthetase Classes

Aminoacyl tRNA synthetases (aaRS) are crucial enzymes that join amino acids to their cognate tRNAs, thereby implementing the genetic code. These enzymes fall into two unrelated structural classes whose evolution has not been explained. The leading hypothesis, proposed by Rodin and Ohno, is that the two classes originated as a pair of sense-antisense genes encoded on opposite strands of a single DNA molecule. This unusual idea obtained its main support from reports of a "Rosetta stone": a locus where genes for heat shock protein 70 (HSP70) and an Nicotinamide adenine dinulecotide-specific glutamate dehydrogenase (NAD-GDH), which are structurally homologous to the two classes of aaRS, overlap extensively on complementary DNA strands. This remarkable locus was first characterized in the oomycete Achlya klebsiana and has since been reported in many other species. Here we present evidence that the open reading frames on the antisense strand of HSP70 genes are spurious, and we identify a more probable candidate for the gene encoding the oomycete NAD-GDH enzyme. These results cast extensive doubt on the Rosetta Stone argument.

Distinct Kinetic Mechanisms of the Two Classes of Aminoacyl-tRNA Synthetases

Aminoacyl-tRNA synthetases are divided into two classes based on both functional and structural criteria. Distinctions between the classes have heretofore been based on general features, such as the position of aminoacylation on the 3′-terminal tRNA ribose, and the topology and tRNA-binding orientation of the active-site protein fold. Here we show instead that transient burst kinetics provides a distinct mechanistic signature dividing the two classes of tRNA synthetases, and that this distinction has significant downstream effects on protein synthesis. Steady-state and transient kinetic analyses of class I CysRS and ValRS, and class II AlaRS and ProRS, reveal that class I tRNA synthetases are rate-limited by release of aminoacyl-tRNA, while class II synthetases are limited by a step prior to aminoacyl transfer. The tight aminoacyl-tRNA product binding by class I enzymes correlates with the ability of EF-Tu to form a ternary complex with class I but not class II synthetases, and the further capacity of this protein to enhance the rate of aminoacylation by class I synthetases. These results emphasize that the distinct mechanistic signatures of class I versus class II tRNA synthetases ensure rapid turnover of aminoacyl-tRNAs during protein synthesis.

Formation of two classes of tRNA synthetases in relation to editing functions and genetic code.

Formation of two classes of tRNA synthetases in relation to editing functions and genetic code.

Two Classes of tRNA Synthetases Suggested by Sterically Compatible Dockings on tRNA Acceptor Stem

This work was supported by grant GM15539 from the National Institutes of Health and by a Fellowship from the National Foundation for Cancer Research. We are grateful to Drs. P. Idesd and K. Ewalt for helpful discussions, and to Dr. H. Bedouelle (Institut Pasteur, Paris) for providing the coordinates of the model for the tRNATyr-TyrRS complex. We thank Dr. S. Cusack (EMBL, Grenoble) for helpful criticisms and for allowing us to contrast the model of the tRNATyr-TyrRS complex with unpublished crystallographic data. We also thank Dr. Yokoyama (University of Tokyo) and coworkers, for allowing us to use the published coordinates of the tRNAVal-ValRS complex before public release.

An operational RNA code for amino acids and possible relationship to genetic code.

RNA helical oligonucleotides that recapitulate the acceptor stems of transfer RNAs, and that are devoid of the anticodon trinucleotides of the genetic code, are aminoacylated by aminoacyl tRNA synthetases. The specificity of aminoacylation is sequence dependent, and both specificity and efficiency are generally determined by only a few nucleotides proximal to the amino acid attachment site. This sequence/structure-dependent aminoacylation of RNA oligonucleotides constitutes an operational RNA code for amino acids. To a rough approximation, members of the two different classes of tRNA synthetases are, like tRNAs, organized into two major domains. The class-defining conserved domain containing the active site incorporates determinants for recognition of RNA mini-helix substrates. This domain may reflect the primordial synthetase, which was needed for expression of the operational RNA code. The second synthetase domain, which generally is less or not conserved, provides for interactions with the second domain of tRNA, which incorporates the anticodon. The emergence of the genetic from the operational RNA code could occur when the second domain of synthetases was added with the anticodon-containing domain of tRNAs.