Event Abstract Back to Event Functional morphology and molecular evolution of chiton ‘shell’ eyes Daniel I. Speiser1*, Sonke Johnsen2 and Todd H. Oakley1 1 University of California Santa Barbara, Ecology, Evolution, and Marine Biology, United States 2 Duke University, Biology Department, United States Image-forming eyes have evolved multiple times in invertebrates and it is almost certain that they have done so through separate step-wise processes. Here, we ask: 1) what are the functional consequences associated with the separate steps of eye evolution and 2) what are the changes in genotype associated with the transitions between these steps? To address these two questions, we are working with chitons (Phylum Mollusca; Class Polyplacophora), chosen because they have unique sensory structures embedded in their shell plates (“aesthetes”) that vary from the ancestral condition of non-pigmented, light-sensitive cells (“photoreceptors”), to pigmented cell clusters (“eyespots”), to what are likely the most recently evolved lens-bearing eyes of any animal (“eyes”; see Figure 1). Chitons also display multiple light-influenced behaviors that are simple, stereotyped, and easily-manipulated. Thus, chitons may reveal how new light-interacting structures (photoreceptors, pigment cells, and lenses) drive new light-influenced behaviors (light-detection, directional photoreception, and spatial vision). We are also using transcriptome sequencing to compare gene expression between the aesthetes of chitons with non-pigmented photoreceptors, eyespots, and eyes. Through behavioral trials and morphological examination, we find that the chiton Acanthopleura granulata forms images using birefringent ‘shell’ lenses made of solid aragonite (visible in Figure 1). Chitons that lack lenses do not demonstrate spatial vision but, intriguingly, are more sensitive to small changes in illumination than chitons with eyes. Our behavioral trials also indicate that A. granulata’s eyes provide equal angular resolution in both air and water. We hypothesize that one of the two refractive indices of the birefringent chiton lens places a focused image on the retina in air, whereas the other does so in water. Through transcriptome sequencing, we find that the aesthetes of chitons -- including those from species with non-pigmented photoreceptors, eyespots, and eyes -- generally express a wide range of vision-related genes, including G-proteins, arrestins, and several types of opsin. Finally, using immunohistochemistry we find that the non-pigmented photoreceptors, but not the eyes, of A. granulata express an r-type opsin similar to those expressed by the cephalic eyes of many invertebrates. We hypothesize that A. granulata has multiple photo-systems that operate via different phototransduction pathways and mediate different light-influenced behaviors. Figure 1 Keywords: chitons, Spatial Vision, eye evolution, Comparative genomics, phylogenomics, Behavior, Animal Conference: International Conference on Invertebrate Vision, Fjälkinge, Sweden, 1 Aug - 8 Aug, 2013. Presentation Type: Oral presentation preferred Topic: Development and evolution Citation: Speiser DI, Johnsen S and Oakley TH (2019). Functional morphology and molecular evolution of chiton ‘shell’ eyes. Front. Physiol. Conference Abstract: International Conference on Invertebrate Vision. doi: 10.3389/conf.fphys.2013.25.00011 Copyright: The abstracts in this collection have not been subject to any Frontiers peer review or checks, and are not endorsed by Frontiers. They are made available through the Frontiers publishing platform as a service to conference organizers and presenters. The copyright in the individual abstracts is owned by the author of each abstract or his/her employer unless otherwise stated. Each abstract, as well as the collection of abstracts, are published under a Creative Commons CC-BY 4.0 (attribution) licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) and may thus be reproduced, translated, adapted and be the subject of derivative works provided the authors and Frontiers are attributed. For Frontiers’ terms and conditions please see https://www.frontiersin.org/legal/terms-and-conditions. Received: 01 Mar 2013; Published Online: 09 Dec 2019. * Correspondence: Dr. Daniel I Speiser, University of California Santa Barbara, Ecology, Evolution, and Marine Biology, Santa Barbara, CA, 93106-6150, United States, dispeiser@gmail.com Login Required This action requires you to be registered with Frontiers and logged in. To register or login click here. Abstract Info Abstract The Authors in Frontiers Daniel I Speiser Sonke Johnsen Todd H Oakley Google Daniel I Speiser Sonke Johnsen Todd H Oakley Google Scholar Daniel I Speiser Sonke Johnsen Todd H Oakley PubMed Daniel I Speiser Sonke Johnsen Todd H Oakley Related Article in Frontiers Google Scholar PubMed Abstract Close Back to top Javascript is disabled. Please enable Javascript in your browser settings in order to see all the content on this page.
Read full abstract