The Czech legislator did not address the exceptionality of the ownership (patrimony) law which Quebec Civil Code (CCQ) authorises (a property without owner) for particular purpose as patrimony right by appropriation in the fiducie (trust) regulation when it was adopted into the Czech legal system (§ 1448 of the Czech Civil Code – CCC). However, the Czech law lacks a transposing provision in the sense of Article 2(2) or Article 915 CCQ (‘property belongs to persons or to the state or, in certain cases, is appropriated to a purpose’) justifying deviations from the concept of a uniform ownership right. In accordance with the concept of ownership in Czech law expressed in the mandatory provision of Article 1011 CCC, this right must belong to a certain person. The solution of the “Czech problem” therefore consists in the personification of the trust, which as a legal person has the status of a fiduciary owner of the trust property. This model does not affect the substance of the ownership of the appropriated (trust) property. The Czech trust may dispose of it only in accordance with its purpose, which is expressed in its by-laws. The flexibility of the trust remains fully preserved in this model. During its lifetime, it is possible to change the persons in the position of trustee or beneficiary or to change the purpose of the trust. The implementation of our model can be done by interpreting the applicable legislation (teleological reduction). However, a change in the wording of section 1448 CCC would better contribute to legal certainty.
Read full abstract