Cisplatin Induction Chemotherapy Research Articles

Unveiling the regulatory mechanism of nimotuzumab on PD-L1 expression in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma patients: Implications for enhanced anticancer treatment strategies

The overexpression of programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) is associated with resistance to anticancer therapies and poor prognosis in patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). Nimotuzumab, a humanized anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mAb, has been widely used clinically for treating several solid tumors. However, whether its anticancer effect involves a reduction in PD-L1 expression remains unclear. The current study aimed to investigate the regulatory effects and underlying mechanism of nimotuzumab on PD-L1 expression in HNSCC both in vitro and in vivo. In vitro, nimotuzumab inhibited IFN-γ-induced PD-L1 upregulation at both the transcriptional and protein levels in the HNSCC cell lines. Subsequent mechanism research revealed that nimotuzumab suppressed IFN-γ-stimulated PD-L1 upregulation mainly by inhibiting phosphorylation of EGFR/MEK/ERK pathway, which was further validated by MEK and ERK inhibitors. In a HNSCC tumor-bearing model, nimotuzumab significantly decreased PD-L1 expression during tumor progression or chemotherapy, and this reduction was accompanied by increased sensitivity of the tumor to docetaxel and atezolizumab. Additionally, nimotuzumab reversed PD-L1 upregulation when combined with Taxol + Cisplatin (TP) induction chemotherapy regimens and improved the CD4+ and CD8+ T cells infiltration in HNSCC patients. These findings provide new insights into the anticancer mechanisms of nimotuzumab in HNSCC.

Induction chemotherapy followed by concurrent chemoradiotherapy combined with toripalimab and Endostar in high-risk locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma: A multicenter, randomized, phase 2 trial.

6086 Background: Even though induction chemotherapy (IC) followed by concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) can improve the survival rate of patients with locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (LA-NPC), the recurrence and/or metastasis rates for patients with stage IV (T4 and/or N3) diseases remain high. This study investigates the efficacy and safety of adding Toripalimab (PD-1 inhibitor) and Endostar (recombinant human endostatin) to IC-CCRT in patients with high-risk LA-NPC. Methods: High-risk LA-NPC patients were randomly divided (1:1) into either the IC-CCRT+TE group (gemcitabine and cisplatin induction chemotherapy followed by concurrent chemoradiotherapy combined with Toripalimab and Endostar) or the IC-CCRT group (gemcitabine and cisplatin induction chemotherapy followed by concurrent chemoradiotherapy). Toripalimab (240mg, d1) was administered intravenously every 3 weeks for up to 12 cycles (3 induction, 2 concurrent, and 7 adjuvant). Endostar (7.5mg/m2, d1-10) was continuously injected intravenously every 3 weeks for a total of 5 cycles (3 induction and 2 concurrent). The primary endpoint was 3-year progression-free survival (PFS), and the secondary endpoints included 3-year overall survival (OS), 3-year locoregional relapse-free survival (LRFS), 3-year distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), objective response rate (ORR) and safety. Results: From September 7, 2020, to August 23, 2022, a total of 106 eligible patients were randomly assigned to the IC-CCRT+TE group (n = 53) and IC-CCRT group (n = 53). At a median follow-up of 25 months, the PFS was significantly improved in the IC-CCRT+TE group compared to the IC-CCRT group (HR=0.36, p=0.041). 28 patients (52.8%) in the IC-CCRT+TE group and 5 patients (9.4%) in the IC-CCRT group achieved complete response (CR) after induction chemotherapy, and the difference was statistically significant (P < 0.001). The incidence of grade ≥3 acute adverse events in the IC-CCRT+TE group and IC-CCRT group was 66.0% and 62.3%, respectively. The incidence of grade ≥3 late adverse events in two groups was 5.8% and 5.7%, respectively. The incidence of grade ≥3 immune-related adverse events was only 4.7%. Conclusions: IC-CCRT combined with Toripalimab and Endostar significantly improved PFS in patients with high-risk locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma, and the adverse events are manageable. Clinical trial information: NCT04447326 .

A prospective multicenter trial of dose escalation for weekly gemcitabine concurrent with intensity-modulated radiotherapy following cisplatin and gemcitabine induction chemotherapy in patients with locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

6071 Background: Gemcitabine and cisplatin induction chemotherapy, followed by cisplatin-based concurrent chemoradiotherapy, constitutes the standard treatment for locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (LANPC). However, the substantial cumulative dosage of cisplatin used in this approach renders it intolerable for many patients due to advanced age or compromised renal function. Therefore, identifying alternative chemotherapeutic agents is crucial. Gemcitabine is a potent radiosensitizer with an overall favorable safety profile. Despite extensive research on the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of concurrent gemcitabine chemotherapy in head and neck cancer, its MTD as a single-agent chemotherapy concurrently administered with intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) in LANPC remains uncertain. Methods: Patients diagnosed with stage III-IVa nasopharyngeal carcinoma were prospectively enrolled in three hospitals located within the largest NPC endemic area in southern China. After two cycles of cisplatin plus gemcitabine induction chemotherapy, patients underwent combined concurrent radiochemotherapy (70 Gy/6-7 weeks) with weekly gemcitabine. The initial dose level was set at 25mg/m2 and subsequently escalated in a sequential manner to higher doses of 50mg/m2, 100mg/m2, 200mg/m2, and 300mg/m2 etc. Our study employed a dose escalation strategy in which the dosage was incremented to the next group only if no more than one out of six patients experienced Dose-Limiting Toxicity (DLT), until DLT occurred in at least two patients. Patients underwent follow-up evaluations every three months. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov under NCT04522050. Results: Between October 2018 and December 2023, a total of 39 Chinese patients were enrolled, 36 (27 males, 9 females) patients were considered evaluable. The incidence of DLT was observed in two out of six patients receiving a dosage level of 300 mg/m², with both cases presenting Grade 3 oral mucositis. Subsequently, the study was replicated using the same dosage level, resulting again in two instances of DLT: one case with Grade 3 radiation dermatitis and another case with oral mucositis. Consequently, a reduced dosage level of 200mg/m² was determined as MTD. No significant hematological toxicity or serious gastrointestinal adverse events were observed. Tumor response evaluation by MRI after twelve weeks of IMRT showed a complete response rate of 100%. To date, only two cases (5.56%) have been reported exhibiting tumor recurrence. Conclusions: The MTD for weekly gemcitabine with IMRT following induction chemotherapy in LANPC is determined to be 200 mg/m2. The DLT associated with this treatment regimen primarily consists of radiation dermatitis and/or oral mucositis. Clinical trial information: NCT04522050 .

Induction-concurrent chemoradiotherapy with or without sintilimab in patients with locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma in China (CONTINUUM): a multicentre, open-label, parallel-group, randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial

Anti-PD-1 therapy and chemotherapy is a recommended first-line treatment for recurrent or metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma, but the role of PD-1 blockade remains unknown in patients with locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma. We assessed the addition of sintilimab, a PD-1 inhibitor, to standard chemoradiotherapy in this patient population. This multicentre, open-label, parallel-group, randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial was conducted at nine hospitals in China. Adults aged 18-65 years with newly diagnosed high-risk non-metastatic stage III-IVa locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (excluding T3-4N0 and T3N1) were eligible. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) using blocks of four to receive gemcitabine and cisplatin induction chemotherapy followed by concurrent cisplatin radiotherapy (standard therapy group) or standard therapy with 200 mg sintilimab intravenously once every 3 weeks for 12 cycles (comprising three induction, three concurrent, and six adjuvant cycles to radiotherapy; sintilimab group). The primary endpoint was event-free survival from randomisation to disease recurrence (locoregional or distant) or death from any cause in the intention-to-treat population. Secondary endpoints included adverse events. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03700476) and is now completed; follow-up is ongoing. Between Dec 21, 2018, and March 31, 2020, 425 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned to the sintilimab (n=210) or standard therapy groups (n=215). At median follow-up of 41·9 months (IQR 38·0-44·8; 389 alive at primary data cutoff [Feb 28, 2023] and 366 [94%] had at least 36 months of follow-up), event-free survival was higher in the sintilimab group compared with the standard therapy group (36-month rates 86% [95% CI 81-90] vs 76% [70-81]; stratified hazard ratio 0·59 [0·38-0·92]; p=0·019). Grade 3-4 adverse events occurred in 155 (74%) in the sintilimab group versus 140 (65%) in the standard therapy group, with the most common being stomatitis (68 [33%] vs 64 [30%]), leukopenia (54 [26%] vs 48 [22%]), and neutropenia (50 [24%] vs 46 [21%]). Two (1%) patients died in the sintilimab group (both considered to be immune-related) and one (<1%) in the standard therapy group. Grade 3-4 immune-related adverse events occurred in 20 (10%) patients in the sintilimab group. Addition of sintilimab to chemoradiotherapy improved event-free survival, albeit with higher but manageable adverse events. Longer follow-up is necessary to determine whether this regimen can be considered as the standard of care for patients with high-risk locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma. National Natural Science Foundation of China, Key-Area Research and Development Program of Guangdong Province, Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province, Overseas Expertise Introduction Project for Discipline Innovation, Guangzhou Municipal Health Commission, and Cancer Innovative Research Program of Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center. For the Chinese translation of the abstract see Supplementary Materials section.

Abstract 4456: De novo pyrimidine synthesis is a druggable vulnerability for chemotherapy resistant nasopharyngeal carcinoma with wild type IDH1

Abstract Chemotherapy resistance is a major obstacle to treat nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC), and strategies to overcome this resistance are required. Using proteomic analysis, we found that NPC patients resistant to gemcitabine plus cisplatin (GP) induction chemotherapy were characterized by abundant metabolic pathways. NPC with high expression of wild-type isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 (wtIDH1) was hyperdependent on de novo pyrimidine nucleotide synthesis and resistant to GP. Knockdown of IDH1 augmented the inhibition of de novo pyrimidine nucleotide synthesis induced by gemcitabine and cisplatin but reversed the suppression of purine nucleotide synthesis, which leading to DNA damage caused by nucleotide pool imbalance. IDH1 facilitated transcription of dihydroorotate dehydrogenase (DHODH), a rate-limiting enzyme for de novo pyrimidine nucleotide synthesis, through promoting chromatin accessibility by ALKBH5 in an α-ketoglutaric acid dependent manner. DHODH inhibitor, BAY2402234 significantly sensitized NPC cells to gemcitabine plus cisplatin chemotherapy. Collectively, these results reveal that wtIDH1-induced increase in de novo pyrimidine nucleotide represents a metabolic vulnerability that can be exploited pharmacologically, highlighting BAY2402234 as a promising strategy to enhance the efficacy of chemotherapy against NPC. Citation Format: Yingqin Li, Yuheng Zhao, Wuqi Zhang, Chunxian Ou, Jiaxi Shen, Jun Ma. De novo pyrimidine synthesis is a druggable vulnerability for chemotherapy resistant nasopharyngeal carcinoma with wild type IDH1 [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2024; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2024 Apr 5-10; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(6_Suppl):Abstract nr 4456.

High Efficacy of Pingxiao Capsule Combines with Docetaxel and Cisplatin Induction Chemotherapy on Oral Squamous Cell Carcinoma in Mice

This study explored the effect of docetaxel and cisplatin on oral squamous cell carcinoma and its modulation by the traditional Chinese medicine Pingxiao capsule. To this end, CAL27 cells were injected subcutaneously into the right axilla of the nude mice to produce solid tumors. The tumor-bearing mice were treated with docetaxel, cisplatin, Pingxiao capsule, cisplatin + docetaxel, cisplatin + Pingxiao capsule, docetaxel + Pingxiao capsule, or cisplatin + docetaxel + Pingxiao capsule, and the treatment outcomes were compared with control. The outcome measures included tumor size, mouse body weight, and tumor histopathology. The results revealed that a single dose of docetaxel, cisplatin, and Pingxiao capsules was effective in suppressing mice tumor volume and body weight, enhancing apoptotic index, and reducing proliferation index. However, the use of a combination of drugs had better effects than the use of any single drug. To conclude, the combination of docetaxel, cisplatin, and Pingxiao capsule has high efficacy in repressing tumor growth by repressing tumor cell proliferation and facilitating tumor cell apoptosis.

Induction chemotherapy plus radiotherapy alone versus cisplatin-based concurrent chemoradiotherapy in locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma: An open-label, non-inferiority, randomized phase 3 trial.

6001 Background: Cisplatin-based concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) has long been regarded as standard treatment for locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (LA-NPC) due to its favorable local control. However, concurrent platinum is associated with intolerable toxicities and ineffective in preventing distant metastasis. Since IMRT enhances the local control and induction chemotherapy (IC) decreases the risk of distant failure, it is worth exploring whether IC plus IMRT alone regimen could replace CCRT for patients with LA-NPC. Methods: This open-label, phase 3, non-inferiority clinical trial was conducted from June 12, 2015 to April 30, 2019. Patients with stage T1-4N2-3 or T3-4N0-1 M0 NPC were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive gemcitabine (1000 mg/m²) and cisplatin (80 mg/m²) IC for 2 cycles followed by IMRT alone or IMRT plus concomitant weekly cisplatin (40 mg/m²) up to 7 cycles. 2-year failure-free survival was set as primary endpoint and non-inferiority margin of 10% was established. Efficacy analysis and safety analysis were dividedly performed in the intention-to-treat and safety population. Results: A total of 249 patients were enrolled, including 124 patients in IC group and 125 patients in CCRT group. Median follow-up time was 60 months (IQR, 48-71). 2-year failure-free survival was 90.2% in IC group versus 86.3% in CCRT group, with an HR of 0.818 (95% CI, 0.479-1.397) and absolute difference of 3.9% (1-sided 95%CI, -4.2 to 11.9). No significant differences were observed between groups in overall survival, locoregional relapse, or distant metastasis. Compared with CCRT group, fewer grade ≥3 AEs occurred in IC group (47.5% vs 61.5%, p = 0.015), including leucopenia, anemia, mucositis, nausea and dysphagia. The IC group had significantly better QoL during and short periods after IMRT, including domains of global health status, physical functioning, fatigue, nausea and vomiting, pain, and appetite loss. Conclusions: For LA-NPC, gemcitabine and cisplatin induction chemotherapy plus IMRT alone was not inferior in 2-year failure-free survival to concurrent chemoradiotherapy. Clinical trial information: NCT02460887 .

Efficacy and safety of induction chemotherapy with docetaxel + cisplatin in selected groups of patients with HNSCC.

e18059 Background: We investigated the efficacy and safety of docetaxel + cisplatin (DC) induction chemotherapy vs TPF in patients with locally advanced HNSCC. Methods: Under our observation there were 22 patients in HNSCC (63,6% men and 36,4% women, aged 43 to 74 years (58.7±9.4 (95% CI 55.0-62.4)). The control group consisted of 18 patients (72,2% men and 27,8% women, aged 43 to 73 years (53.9±8.8 (95% CI 49.6-58.3). Both groups were comparable in terms of location, stage (III-IVA) and tumor differentiation. The patients of group 1 received DC (docetaxel 75 mg/m2 + cisplatin 75 mg/m2; q3w) as induction chemotherapy (ICT), while patients in the control group received TPF. Results: The planned number of ICT cycles (No. 3) in group 1 was received by 100% pts. and in the control group - 77.78% pts. (p = 0.02). At the control assessment according to RECIST 1.1, PR was registered in 77.3% pts. of group 1 vs 55.5% pts. in control group (p = 0.14), SD - in 22.7% vs 33.3: (p = 0.45), PD was registered only in patients of the control group - in 11.2% (p = 0.11). The frequency of registration of AEs: diarrhea gr.1-3 - 9.1% pts. group 1 vs 33.3% of pts. the control group (p = 0.06), nausea gr.1 -2 - 9.1% vs 22.2% (p= 0.25), asthenia gr. 1-2 - 4.5% versus 16.7% (p = 0.20), anemia gr. 1-2 - 9.1% vs. 16.7% (p = 0.47), neutropenia gr. 3-4– 4.5% versus 16.7% (p = 0.20). Reduction of doses of cytostatic up to 50% was performed in 4.5% pts. in group 1 and 16.7% pts. in the control group (p = 0.20). Conclusions: Induction chemotherapy in DC mode may be an effective and safe regimen in certain groups of patients with HNCH (for example, in patients with contraindications to 5-FU infusions, as well as in patients with high-risk HHNH for alternative surgical treatment or concurrent CRT as initial treatment of localized and locally advanced HNSCC.

Induction chemotherapy with sequential nimotuzumab plus concurrent chemoradiotherapy in advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma: A retrospective real-world study.

Many locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients develop local recurrence or distant metastasis. Our retrospective real-world study aims to evaluate the efficacy and safety of curative sequential approach with induction chemotherapy followed by concurrent chemoradiation + nimotuzumab as first-line therapy in advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma. From 2015 to 2021, the clinic data of 117 patients with advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (stage III-IV a) who were treated in the Affiliated Hospital of Guangdong Medical University were retrospectively reviewed. Fifty-four patients in observation group received taxanes, cisplatin, and 5-fluorouracil/taxanes and cisplatin induction chemotherapy and nimotuzumab (200 mg, weekly) combined with concurrent chemo-radiotherapy (cisplatin: 40 mg/m2 weekly; intensity-modulated radiation therapy); 63 patients in control group received same therapy without nimotuzumab. There was no significant difference in patients' characteristic baseline between 2 groups (P > .05). The complete response rate and objective response rate of the observational group was significantly higher than control group (46.30% vs 17.64%, P = .01; 96.30% vs 82.54%, P = .02). The median follow-up time was 24.77 (3.53-65.97) months. Both of the median progress free survival time and overall survival time were not reached. The 5-year progression-free survival rate of observation group was greater than control group (84.40% vs 63.70%, hazard ratios 0.365, 95% confidence intervals 0.147-0.909, P = .03). The 5-year overall survival rate of observation group and control group were 91.70% and 84.60%, respectively (P = .20). None of the patients withdrew from the study due to adverse events. Nimotuzumab combined with concurrent chemoradiotherapy as first-line therapy in advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma can improve objective response rate and 5-year progress free survival rate with good safety profile.

Chemotherapy-Induced Senescence Reprogramming Promotes Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma Metastasis by circRNA-Mediated PKR Activation.

Senescence is associated with tumor metastasis and chemotherapy resistance, yet the mechanisms remain elusive. Here, it is identified that nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) patients who developed distant metastasis are characterized by senescence phenotypes, in which circWDR37 is a key regulator. CircWDR37 deficiency limits cisplatin or gemcitabine-induced senescent NPC cells from proliferation, migration, and invasion. Mechanistically, circWDR37 binds to and dimerizes double-stranded RNA-activated protein kinase R (PKR) to initiate PKR autophosphorylation and activation. Independent of its kinase activity, phosphorylated PKR induces I-kappaB kinase beta (IKKβ) phosphorylation, binds to and releases RELA from NF-κB inhibitor alpha (IκBα) to trigger nuclear factor kappa B (NF-κB) activation, thereby stimulating cyclin D1 (CCND1)and senescence-associated secretory phenotype component gene transcription in a circWDR37-dependent manner. Low circWDR37 levels correlate with chemotherapy response and favorable survival in NPC patients treated with gemcitabine or cisplatin induction chemotherapy. This study uncovers a new mechanism of circWDR37 activated PKR in senescence-driven metastasis and provides appealing therapeutic targets in NPC.

De-escalating elective nodal irradiation for nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

Treatment outcomes for endemic nasopharyngeal carcinoma have steadily improved over the past two decades with routine use of intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT), concurrent chemotherapy, and MRI staging. 1 Peng G Wang T Yang KY et al. A prospective, randomized study comparing outcomes and toxicities of intensity-modulated radiotherapy vs conventional two-dimensional radiotherapy for the treatment of nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Radiother Oncol. 2012; 104: 286-293 Summary Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (420) Google Scholar , 2 Blanchard P Lee A Marguet S et al. Chemotherapy and radiotherapy in nasopharyngeal carcinoma: an update of the MAC-NPC meta-analysis. Lancet Oncol. 2015; 16: 645-655 Summary Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (459) Google Scholar In the past decade, trials have primarily focused on treatment escalation with induction and consolidative chemotherapy. 3 Zhang Y Chen L Hu GQ et al. Gemcitabine and cisplatin induction chemotherapy in nasopharyngeal carcinoma. N Engl J Med. 2019; 381: 1124-1135 Crossref PubMed Scopus (312) Google Scholar , 4 Pan JJ Ng WT Zong JF et al. Proposal for the 8th edition of the AJCC/UICC staging system for nasopharyngeal cancer in the era of intensity-modulated radiotherapy. Cancer. 2016; 122: 546-558 Crossref PubMed Scopus (164) Google Scholar , 5 Chen YP Liu X Zhou Q et al. Metronomic capecitabine as adjuvant therapy in locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a multicentre, open-label, parallel-group, randomised, controlled, phase 3 trial. Lancet. 2021; 398: 303-313 Summary Full Text Full Text PDF PubMed Scopus (23) Google Scholar However, with modern treatment, fewer than 20% of patients with non-metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma develop disease recurrence. In this population with few competing risks, these excellent outcomes have promoted renewed interest in individualised treatment de-intensification. Elective upper-neck versus whole-neck irradiation of the uninvolved neck in patients with nasopharyngeal carcinoma: an open-label, non-inferiority, multicentre, randomised phase 3 trialElective UNI of the uninvolved neck provides similar regional control and results in less radiation toxicity compared with standard WNI in patients with N0–N1 nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Full-Text PDF

The immune modulation effects of gemcitabine plus cisplatin induction chemotherapy in nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

BackgroundStudies are trying to add immunotherapy to gemcitabine and cisplatin (GP) induction chemotherapy, the standard therapy, in nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) patients with locoregionally advanced disease. However, how the immune system responds to GP remains unknown.MethodWe examined the dynamic changes of circulating immune cells and plasma cytokines in NPC patients administered with GP.ResultAfter GP administration, immunosuppressive myeloid cells, including CD11b+CD14+ monocytes, CD33+ myeloid cells, CD33+CD11+ myeloid cells, total MDSCs (CD33+CD11+HLA‐DR−/low), monocytic MDSCs, and granulocytic MDSCs decreased significantly. The regulatory T cells and B cells, two important suppressive lymphocyte subpopulations, also decreased. On the other hand, the levels of CD3+ T cells, total B cells, central memory CD4+ T cells, and pro‐inflammatory cytokines (including Interleukin [IL]‐1β, IL‐6, IL‐2, IL‐5, and IL‐8) increased significantly after GP administration. Besides, GP chemotherapy did not weaken the cytotoxic activity and proliferative capacity of T cells.ConclusionOur results showed the immune modulation effect of GP induction chemotherapy in locoregionally advanced NPC, providing a solid basis for its combination with immunotherapy.

Gemcitabine synergizes with cisplatin to inhibit nasopharyngeal carcinoma cell proliferation and tumor growth.

In a recently published phase III clinical trial, gemcitabine (GEM) plus cisplatin (DDP) induction chemotherapy significantly improved recurrence-free survival and overall survival and became the standard of care among patients with locoregionally advanced NPC. However, the molecular mechanisms of GEM synergized with DPP in NPC cells remain elucidated. These findings prompt us to explore the effect of the combination between GEM and DDP in NPC cell lines through proliferative phenotype, immunofluorescence, flow cytometry, and western blotting assays. In vitro studies reveal that GEM or DPP treated alone induces cell cycle arrest, promotes cell apoptosis, forces DNA damage response, and GEM synergism with DDP significantly increases the above effects in NPC cells. In vivo studies indicate that GEM or DPP treated alone significantly inhibits the tumor growth and prolongs the survival time of mice injected with SUNE1 cells compared to the control group. Moreover, the mice treated with GEM combined with DDP have smaller tumors and survive longer than those in GEM or DPP treated alone group. In addition, P-gp may be the key molecule that regulates the synergistic effect of gemcitabine and cisplatin. GEM synergizes with DPP to inhibit NPC cell proliferation and tumor growth by inducing cell cycle arrest, cell apoptosis, and DNA damage response, which reveals the mechanisms of combined GEM and DDP induction chemotherapy in improving locoregionally advanced NPC.

A meta-analysis comparing the efficacy and safety of gemcitabine plus cisplatin induction chemotherapy in patients with locoregionally advanced NPC.

Nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) is a malignant tumor endangering human health. Gemcitabine or cisplatin chemotherapy has been regarded as effective treatment for patients with locoregionally advanced NPC. However, the effect of gemcitabine plus cisplatin concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) remained controversial among the studies. Therefore, we conducted this meta-analysis to assess the efficacy and safety of induction chemotherapy by gemcitabine and cisplatin (GP regimen) in patients with locoregionally advanced NPC. A systematic literature search was performed using PubMed, Web of Science, and Embase to evaluate the survival benefit and toxicity profiles of patients with locoregionally advanced NPC who were treated with CCRT. A random-effects model or a fixed-effects model was used to pool the data according to the heterogeneity among the included studies. A total of five studies with 1286 patients met the inclusion criteria and were included in this meta-analysis. Pooled estimate showed that GP regimen was associated with significant improvements in OS (HR = 0.57, 95% CI 0.45, 0.73; P < 0.001), DFS (HR = 0.56, 95% CI 0.47, 0.66; P < 0.001), and DRFS (HR = 0.51, 95% CI 0.36, 0.73; P < 0.001), but not in LRFS (HR = 0.54, 95% CI 0.25, 1.19; P = 0.126) and ORR (RR = 1.30, 95% CI 0.54, 3.09; P = 0.556). Moreover, the incidence of adverse events of all grades (RR = 1.15, 95%CI 0.11, 1.38; P = 0.063) or grade 3-4 (RR = 0.96, 95%CI 0.57, 1.29; P = 0.385), was comparable between GP regimen and control treatments. Our meta-analysis indicated that the patients with locoregionally advanced NPC could benefit from the regimen of gemcitabine plus cisplatin induction chemotherapy.

Docetaxel and cisplatin induction chemotherapy with or without fluorouracil in locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma: A retrospective propensity score matching analysis.

PurposeTo investigate whether the addition of fluorouracil to docetaxel and cisplatin induction chemotherapy (IC) can truly improve the prognosis of patients with locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC).MethodsA total of 801 patients newly diagnosed with non‐metastatic locoregionally advanced NPC were included as the subjects. In this study, propensity score matching (PSM) was used for analysis of overall survival (OS), distant metastasis‐free survival (DMFS), progression‐free survival (PFS) and locoregional relapse‐free survival (LRRFS), and the chi‐squared test or Fisher's exact test was used to investigate toxic reactions.ResultsPatients received treatment with docetaxel and cisplatin (TP) or docetaxel, cisplatin and fluorouracil (TPF). With a median follow‐up time of 60 months (range: 5–124 months), the TPF group had better 5‐year OS (84.7% vs 79.0%; P = 0.037), PFS (84.6% vs 76.8%; P = 0.008) and DMFS (89.5% vs 82.3%; P = 0.004) than the TP group. After PSM, 258 patients were matched in each cohort. The Kaplan–Meier analysis showed that the 5‐year OS, PFS and DMFS were 85.5%, 84.2% and 89.2%, respectively, in the TPF group, higher than the 80.8%, 75.0% and 81.4%, respectively, in the TP group (P = 0.048, 0.009 and 0.006, respectively). Moreover, the multivariate analysis revealed that different IC regimens were independent prognostic factors for PFS and DMFS (P = 0.014 and 0.010, respectively).ConclusionThis study found that compared with the TP regimen, TPF induction chemotherapy is associated with improved survival in patients with locoregionally advanced NPC. TPF can produce more mucosal and nausea/vomiting adverse reactions than TP.

Clinical value of docetaxel plus cisplatin (TP) induction chemotherapy followed by TP concurrent chemoradiotherapy in locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

Objective: To investigate the clinical value of induction chemotherapy (IC) with docetaxel plus cisplatin (TP) followed by concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) with TP in locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC).Methods: A total of 544 patients with locoregionally advanced NPC that was newly diagnosed from January 2009 to December 2015 were included in this study. Among these patients, 251 were treated with TP induction chemotherapy followed by CCRT with cisplatin (DDP) alone (TP + DDP group), 167 were treated with TP followed by CCRT with TP (TP + TP group), and 126 were treated with docetaxel, DDP and fluorouracil (TPF) followed by CCRT with DDP alone (TPF + DDP group). Overall survival (OS), distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS), progression-free survival (PFS) and locoregional relapse-free survival (LRRFS) were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method and a Cox proportional hazards model.Results: Survival analysis showed that the 5-year OS, PFS and DMFS rates in the TP + DDP group were significantly lower than those in the TP + TP group after propensity score matching (PSM). Multivariate analysis revealed that CCRT with TP was an independent prognostic factor for OS, PFS and DMFS. During CCRT, the incidence rates of grade 3/4 nausea/vomiting, oral mucositis, leukocytopenia and neutropenia were significantly increased in the TP + TP group compared with the TP + DDP group (all P < 0.05). To further explore the value of TP + TP, we performed PSM again with the TPF + DDP group. After PSM, there were 100 patients in each group. Survival analysis showed no significant differences in the 5-year OS, PFS, DMFS and LRRFS rates between the two groups. During IC and CCRT, the rate of grade 3/4 nausea/vomiting in the TPF + DDP group was higher than that in the TP+TP group (9.0% vs. 2.0%, P = 0.030; 18.0% vs. 8.0%, P = 0.036, respectively). No significant difference in the incidence of grade 3/4 hematologic toxicity was found between the two groups (all P > 0.05).Conclusion: TP + TP can reduce the distant metastasis of locoregionally advanced NPC and improve OS compared with TP + DDP; TP + TP has the same effect as TPF + DDP and is clinically feasible.

Phase II study of induction chemotherapy followed by concurrent chemoradiotherapy with raltitrexed and cisplatin in locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma.

ObjectiveFor locally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (LA-NPC) patients, high incidences of distant metastases and severe treatment related toxicities are the main obstacles needed to be overcome. Raltitrexed, a specific thymidylate synthase inhibitor with a convenient administration schedule, has an acceptable and manageable toxicity, and possesses radio-sensitizing properties. To investigate the efficacy and safety of raltitrexed and cisplatin induction chemotherapy and concurrent chemoradiotherapy (IC+CCRT) in patients with LA-NPC, a phase II clinical study was conducted.MethodsSixty eligible patients with LA-NPC were enrolled into this study. A raltitrexed-cisplatin combination was used as part of an IC+CCRT regimen. Raltitrexed-cisplatin IC was given once every 3 weeks (q3w) for two cycles, followed by raltitrexed-cisplatin based CCRT q3w for two cycles. Intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) was given for all enrolled patients.ResultsAll patients were included in survival analysis according to the intent-to-treat principle. The objective response rate (ORR) 3 months after treatment was 98%. The 2-year overall survival (OS) rate was 92%. The median relapse-free survival (RFS) time was 30.5 [95% confidence interval (95% CI), 28.4−32.3] months. The 2-year RFS rate was 85%. The 2-year local failure-free survival (LFFS) rate was 97% and the 2-year distant metastasis-free survival (DMFS) rate was 88%. Acute toxicities were mostly grade 2 and 3 reactions in bone marrow suppression, gastrointestinal side effect and oropharyngeal mucositis. Only two patients occurred grade 4 acute toxicities, one was bone marrow suppression and the other was dermatitis radiation.ConclusionsThe combination of raltitrexed and cisplatin has a comparable efficacy to those in standard first-line therapy.

Gemcitabine and Cisplatin Induction Chemotherapy in Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma

BackgroundPlatinum-based concurrent chemoradiotherapy is the standard of care for patients with locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Additional gemcitabine and cisplatin induction chemotherapy has shown promising efficacy in phase 2 trials.MethodsIn a parallel-group, multicenter, randomized, controlled, phase 3 trial, we compared gemcitabine and cisplatin as induction chemotherapy plus concurrent chemoradiotherapy with concurrent chemoradiotherapy alone. Patients with locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive gemcitabine (at a dose of 1 g per square meter of body-surface area on days 1 and 8) plus cisplatin (80 mg per square meter on day 1), administered every 3 weeks for three cycles, plus chemoradiotherapy (concurrent cisplatin at a dose of 100 mg per square meter every 3 weeks for three cycles plus intensity-modulated radiotherapy) or chemoradiotherapy alone. The primary end point was recurrence-free survival (i.e., freedom from disease recurrence [distant metastasis or locoregional recurrence] or death from any cause) in the intention-to-treat population. Secondary end points included overall survival, treatment adherence, and safety.ResultsA total of 480 patients were included in the trial (242 patients in the induction chemotherapy group and 238 in the standard-therapy group). At a median follow-up of 42.7 months, the 3-year recurrence-free survival was 85.3% in the induction chemotherapy group and 76.5% in the standard-therapy group (stratified hazard ratio for recurrence or death, 0.51; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.34 to 0.77; P=0.001). Overall survival at 3 years was 94.6% and 90.3%, respectively (stratified hazard ratio for death, 0.43; 95% CI, 0.24 to 0.77). A total of 96.7% of the patients completed three cycles of induction chemotherapy. The incidence of acute adverse events of grade 3 or 4 was 75.7% in the induction chemotherapy group and 55.7% in the standard-therapy group, with a higher incidence of neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, anemia, nausea, and vomiting in the induction chemotherapy group. The incidence of grade 3 or 4 late toxic effects was 9.2% in the induction chemotherapy group and 11.4% in the standard-therapy group.ConclusionsInduction chemotherapy added to chemoradiotherapy significantly improved recurrence-free survival and overall survival, as compared with chemoradiotherapy alone, among patients with locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma. (Funded by the Innovation Team Development Plan of the Ministry of Education and others; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01872962.)

Personalized TPF induction chemotherapy on the basis of stathmin expression in patients with locally advanced oral squamous cell carcinoma.

6040 Background: A randomized phase 3 trial failed to demonstrate a survival advantage for TPF (docetaxel, cisplatin, and 5-fluorouracil) induction chemotherapy in the overall study population of patients with locally advanced and resectable oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC). It is possible that personalized TPF-based induction chemotherapy might improve outcomes in biomarker-defined subsets of patients. Methods: Immunohistochemical staining against stathmin was performed in pre-treatment biopsy specimens in 170 OSCC patients from our randomized trial. Chemoresistance to TPF chemotherapy drugs regulated by stathmin expression was investigated. The anti-cancer activity of TPF chemotherapy drugs alone, a combination of TPF drugs and PI3K-AKT-mTOR pathway inhibitors, and vincristine were investigated using in vitro and in vivo OSCC models. Results: OSCC patients with low stathmin expression benefited from TPF induction chemotherapy in terms of overall survival (HR = 0.102, 95% CI:0.013-0.781, P = 0.028), disease-free survival (HR = 0.070, 95% CI:0.009-0.525, P = 0.010), locoregional recurrence-free survival (HR = 0.070, 95% CI:0.009-0.524, P = 0.010), and distant metastasis-free survival (HR = 0.101, 95% CI:0.013-0.767, P = 0.027). Stathmin overexpression promoted cellular proliferation and chemoresistance to TPF drugs in OSCC (P &lt; 0.05). PI3K pathway inhibitors decreased stathmin expression and phosphorylation, and improved the chemosensitivity to TPF drugs in vitro and in vivo (P &lt; 0.05). Vincristine decreased stathmin expression and phosphorylation, and OSCC lines were significantly sensitive to vincristine in vitro and in vivo (P &lt; 0.01). Conclusions: Our results suggest a potential personalized TPF induction chemotherapy on the basis of stathmin expression in OSCC patients: patients with low stathmin expression in the biopsy samples are suggested to receive TPF induction chemotherapy followed by surgical resection and post-operative radiotherapy. For patients with stathmin overexpression PI3K inhibitor is a good choice to improve the inductive effect of TPF chemotherapy drugs; vincristine is a potential alternative for a chemotherapy drug when a patient is chemoresistant to or unsuitable to receive TPF chemotherapy drugs; however, more clinical trials are warranted to verify this optimization protocol.

Gemcitabine and cisplatin (GP) induction chemotherapy (IC) plus concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) versus CCRT alone in locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC): A phase 3, multicenter, randomized controlled trial.

6003 Background: GP regimen has been established as the standard first-line treatment option for patients with recurrent/metastatic NPC. However, its efficacy in locoregionally advanced disease remains unclear. Methods: Patients with previously untreated, non-metastatic stage III-IVB (except T3-4N0M0, AJCC 7th) NPC, aged 18–64 years without severe comorbidities were eligible. They were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive GP IC (gemcitabine 1 g/m2on days 1 &amp; 8, cisplatin 80 mg/m2 on day 1, q3w for 3 cycles) plus CCRT (cisplatin 100 mg/m2, q3w for 3 cycles, concurrently with intensity-modulated radiotherapy) or CCRT alone. The primary endpoint was failure-free survival (FFS). The calculated sample size was 238 per group, with an 80% power (two-sided α 0.05) to detect a treatment failure hazard ratio (HR) of 0.52. Results: From Dec 2013 to Sep 2016, 480 patients from 12 centers were randomly assigned to IC+CCRT (n = 242) or CCRT alone (n = 238) group. Baseline characteristics were well balanced. After a median follow-up of 39 months, 3-year FFS was 85.8% in the IC+CCRT group and 77.2% in the CCRT alone group (intention-to-treat population; HR 0.53, 95% confidence interval 0.34–0.81; P = 0.003). In GP+CCRT group, 239 patients started GP IC and 231 (96.7%) completed all three cycles. The most common ≥grade 3 adverse events (AE) in IC+CCRT and CCRT group were mucositis (28.9% vs. 32.1%), neutropenia (28.0% vs. 10.5%) and leukopenia (26.4% vs. 20.3%). Conclusions: Adding GP IC to CCRT significantly improved FFS in locoregionally advanced NPC and is well tolerated with favorable toxicity profile. Clinical trial information: NCT01872962. [Table: see text]