Circulating Tumor Endothelial Cells Research Articles

Disseminated tumor cells in bone marrow as predictive classifiers for small cell lung cancer patients

BackgroundSmall cell lung cancer (SCLC) is a highly aggressive disease characterized by early metastasis. Aneuploid CD31- disseminated tumor cells (DTCs) and CD31+ disseminated tumor endothelial cells (DTECs) residing in the bone marrow are generally considered as the initiators of metastatic process. However, the clinical significance of DTCs and DTECs in SCLC remains poorly understood. The aim of this study is to investigate the clinical implications of diverse subtypes of highly heterogeneous DTCs and DTECs in SCLC patients. MethodsSubtraction enrichment and immunostaining-fluorescence in situ hybridization (SE-iFISH) was applied to enrich and perform comprehensive morphologic, karyotypic, and phenotypic characterization of aneuploid DTCs and DTECs in 30 patients. Additionally, co-detection of circulating tumor cells (CTCs) and circulating tumor endothelial cells (CTECs) was conducted on 24 of the enrolled patients. Proof-of-concept of the whole exon sequencings (WES) on precisely selected different subtypes of CTCs or DTCs, longitudinally detected from a representative case with pathologically confirmed bone marrow metastasis, was validated to feasibly reveal genetic mutations in these cells. ResultsDTCs, DTECs and their subtypes were readily detectable in SCLC patients. Comparative analysis revealed that the number of DTCs and DTECs was significantly higher than that of their corresponding CTCs and CTECs (P < 0.001 for both). Positive detection of disseminated tumor microemboli (DTM) or disseminated tumor endothelial microemboli (DTEM) was associated with inferior survival outcomes (P = 0.046 and P = 0.048). Patients with EpCAM+ DTCs detectable displayed significantly lower disease control rate (DCR) (16.67 % vs 73.33 %, P = 0.019), reduced median progression-free survival (mPFS) and median overall survival (mOS) compared with those with EpCAM- DTCs (P = 0.028 and P = 0.002, respectively). WES analysis indicated that post-treatment DTCs isolated from bone marrow at the time of disease progression shared more homologous somatic gene mutations with pre-treatment CTCs compared with post-treatment CTCs. ConclusionsOur findings suggest that bone marrow sampling and characterization of DTC subtypes provided a valuable tool for predicting treatment response and the prognosis in SCLC. Moreover, DTCs inherit a greater amount of homologous somatic information from pre-treatment CTCs, indicating their potential role in disease progression and treatment resistance.

Biphasic co-detection of melanoma aneuploid tumor cells and tumor endothelial cells in guidance of specifying the field cancerized surgical excision margin and administering immunotherapy

An optimum safety excision margin (EM) delineated by precise demarcation of field cancerization along with reliable biomarkers that enable predicting and timely evaluating patients’ response to immunotherapy significantly impact effective management of melanoma. In this study, optimized biphasic “immunofluorescence staining integrated with fluorescence insitu hybridization” (iFISH) was conducted along the diagnosis-metastasis-treatment-cellular MRD axis to longitudinally co-detect a full spectrum of intact CD31− aneuploid tumor cells (TCs), CD31+ aneuploid tumor endothelial cells (TECs), viable and necrotic circulating TCs (CTCs) and circulating TECs (CTECs) expressing PD-L1, Ki67, p16 and Vimentin in unsliced specimens of the resected primary tumor, EM, dissected sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) and peripheral blood in an early-stage melanoma patient. Numerous PD-L1+ aneuploid TCs and TECs were detected at the conventional safety EM (2 cm), quantitatively indicating the existence of a field cancerized EM for the first time. Contrary to highly heterogeneous PD-L1 expression and degrees of Chr8 aneuploidy in TCs and TECs in the primary lesions as well as CTCs and CTECs in peripheral blood, almost all TCs and TECs in SLNs and EM were homogeneously PD-L1+ haploid cells. Dynamic monitoring and cellular MRD assessment revealed that, in contrast to PD-L1+ CTCs being responsive to the immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI-anti-PD-1), multiploid (≥pentasomy 8) PD-L1+ and Ki67+ CTECs were respectively resistant to ICI-sensitized T cells. In therapeutically stressed lymphatic and hematogenous metastatic cascades, stratified phenotypic and karyotypic profiling of iFISH tissue and liquid biopsied TCs, TECs, CTCs and CTECs in future large-cohort studies will enable appropriate re-specification of the optimal safety EM and distribution mapping of in-depth characterized, subcategorized target cells to help illustrate their metastatic relevance, ultimately improving risk stratification and clinical intervention of tumor progression, metastases, therapy resistance and cancer relapse.

Aptamer/Peptide-Functionalized Nanoprobe for Detecting Multiple miRNAs in Circulating Malignant Cells to Study Tumor Heterogeneity.

Identification of diverse biomarkers in heterogenic circulating malignant cells (CMCs) such as circulating tumor cells (CTCs) and circulating tumor endothelial cells (CTECs) has crucial significance in tumor diagnosis. However, it remains a substantial challenge to achieve in situ detection of multiple miRNA markers in living cells in blood. Herein, we demonstrate that an aptamer/peptide-functionalized vector can deliver molecular beacons into targeted living CMCs in peripheral blood of patients for in situ detection of multiple cancer biomarkers, including miRNA-21 (miR-21) and miRNA-221 (miR-221). Based on miR-21 and miR-221 levels, heterogenic CMCs are identified for both nondistant metastatic and distant metastatic cancer patients. CMCs from nondistant metastatic and distant metastatic cancer patients exhibit similar miR-21 levels, while the miR-221 level in CMCs of the distant metastatic cancer patient is higher than that of the nondistant metastatic cancer patient. With the capability to realize precise probing of multiple intracellular biomarkers in living CMCs at the single-cell resolution, the nanoprobe can reveal the tumor heterogeneity and provide useful information for diagnosis and prognosis. The nanoprobe we developed would accelerate the progress toward noninvasive precise cancer diagnosis.

Longitudinal detection of subcategorized CD44v6+ CTCs and circulating tumor endothelial cells (CTECs) enables novel clinical stratification and improves prognostic prediction of small cell lung cancer: A prospective, multi-center study

Current management of small cell lung cancer (SCLC) remains challenging. Effective biomarkers are needed to subdivide patients presenting distinct treatment response and clinical outcomes. An understanding of heterogeneous phenotypes of aneuploid CD31- circulating tumor cells (CTCs) and CD31+ circulating tumor endothelial cells (CTECs) may provide novel insights in the clinical management of SCLC. In the present translational and prospective study, increased cancer metastasis-related cell proliferation and motility, accompanied with up-regulated mesenchymal marker vimentin but down-regulated epithelial marker E-cadherin, were observed in both lentivirus infected SCLC and NSCLC cells overexpressing the stemness marker CD44v6. Aneuploid CTCs and CTECs expressing CD44v6 were longitudinally detected by SE-iFISH in 120 SCLC patients. Positive detection of baseline CD44v6+ CTCs and CD44v6+ CTECs was significantly associated with enhanced hepatic metastasis. Karyotype analysis revealed that chromosome 8 (Chr8) in CD44v6+ CTCs shifted from trisomy 8 towards multiploidy in post-therapeutic patients compared to pre-treatment subjects. Furthermore, the burden of baseline CD44v6+ CTCs (t0) or amid the therapy (t1-2), the ratio of baseline CD31+ CTEC/CD31- CTC (t0), and CTC-WBC clusters (t0) were correlated with treatment response and distant metastases, particularly brain metastasis, in subjects with limited disease (LD-SCLC) but not in those with extensive disease (ED-SCLC). Multivariate survival analysis validated that longitudinally detected CD44v6+/CD31- CTCs was an independent prognostic factor for inferior survival in SCLC patients. Our study provides evidence for the first time that comprehensive analyses of CTCs, CTECs, and their respective CD44v6+ subtypes enable clinical stratification and improve prognostic prediction of SCLC, particularly for potentially curable LD-SCLC.

Nonhematogenic circulating aneuploid cells confer inferior prognosis and therapeutic resistance in gliomas

Aneuploidy is the hallmark of malignancy. Our previous study successfully detected nonhematogenic circulating aneuploidy cells (CACs) in types of gliomas. The current prospective clinical study aims to further precisely subcategorize aneuploid CACs, including CD31− circulating tumor cells (CTCs) and CD31+ circulating tumor endothelial cells, and thoroughly investigate the clinical utilities of these different subtypes of cells. Co‐detection and analysis of CTCs and circulating tumor‐derived endothelial cells (CTECs) expressing CD133, glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP), or epidermal growth factor receptor variant III (EGFR vIII) were performed by integrated subtraction enrichment and immunostaining fluorescence in situ hybridization (SE‐iFISH) in 111 preoperative primary diffuse glioma patients. Aneuploid CACs could be detected in most de novo glioma patients. Among detected CACs, 45.6% were CD31−/CD45− aneuploid CTCs and the remaining 54.4% were CD31+/CD45− aneuploid CTECs. Positive detection of CTECs significantly correlated with disruption of the blood–brain barrier. The median number of large CTCs (LCTCs, >5 μm, 2) in low‐grade glioma (WHO grade 2) was less than high‐grade glioma (WHO grades 3 and 4) (3, p = 0.044), but this difference was not observed in small CTCs (SCTCs, ≤5 μm), CTECs or CACs (CTCs + CTECs). The numbers of CTCs, CTECs, or CACs in patients with contrast‐enhancing (CE) lesions considerably exceeded that of non‐CE lesions (p < 0.05). Receiver operating characteristic curves demonstrated that CD31+ CTECs, especially LCTECs, exhibited a close positive relationship with CE lesions. Survival analysis revealed that the high number of CD31− CTCs could be an adverse factor for compromised progression‐free survival and overall survival. Longitudinal surveillance of CD31− CTCs was suitable for evaluating the therapeutic response and for monitoring potential emerging treatment resistance.

Optimal Strategy for Colorectal Cancer Patients' Diagnosis Based on Circulating Tumor Cells and Circulating Tumor Endothelial Cells by Subtraction Enrichment and Immunostaining-Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization Combining with CEA and CA19-9.

Background Cancerous embryo antigen (CEA) and carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA19-9) are commonly used in clinical practice to assist in diagnosing CRC. However, their sensitivity is very low. This study aims to investigate the clinical significance of circulating tumor cells (CTCs) and circulating tumor endothelial cells (CTECs) compared with CEA and CA19-9 in the auxiliary diagnosis of colorectal cancer (CRC) patients. Methods 115 pathologically confirmed CRC patients and 20 healthy controls were enrolled in this study. CTCs and CTECs were enriched and identified by subtraction enrichment and immunostaining-fluorescence in situ hybridization (SE-iFISH). A logistic regression was used to establish a model for the receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis, and the diagnostic efficacy of CTCs, CTECs, CEA, CA19-9, and their combinations was analyzed. Results The CTC (P < 0.0001) and CTEC (P=0.0009) level was significantly higher in CRC patients than that in healthy controls. For CRC patients, CTC and CTEC level was significantly correlated with tumor stage and lymph node metastasis status, but not with sex, age, tumor location, and degree of differentiation. The positive rate of CTCs, CTECs, CEA, and CA19-9 in CRC patients was 87.8%, 39.1%, 28.7%, and 26.1%, respectively. To distinguish CRC patients from controls, the area under the curve (AUC) of CTC was 0.889, which was much higher than 0.695 of CTEC, 0.696 of CEA, and 0.695 of CA19-9. Establishing ROC curve by logistic regression algorithm, the highest AUC was 0.935, which combined CTCs with CTEC, CEA, and CA19-9. Conclusions CTCs combined with CTEC, CEA, and CA19-9 are useful to improve the diagnostic efficiency, which has high clinical significance in the diagnosis of colorectal cancer.

Identification and Comprehensive Co-Detection of Necrotic and Viable Aneuploid Cancer Cells in Peripheral Blood.

Simple SummaryCirculating tumor cells (CTCs) and CD31+ circulating tumor endothelial cells (CTECs) constitute a unique pair of cellular circulating tumor biomarkers and play a crucial role in cancer metastasis and disease progression. Precise detection of live and necrotic aneuploid CTCs and CTECs in therapeutic cancer patients, though clinically highly demanded, has yet to be achieved in the field. The aim of this study is to develop a comprehensive strategy to effectively distinguish and co-detect viable and dead non-hematological cancer cells harboring aneuploid chromosomes and expressing various tumor markers. The innovative strategy developed in the present study will assist in an efficient assessment of therapy effectiveness, rapid detection of emerging treatment resistance and bringing in new insights into the comprehension of cancer cells in circulation.Aneuploid circulating tumor cells (CTCs, CD31−) and circulating tumor endothelial cells (CTECs, CD31+) exhibit an active interplay in peripheral blood, and play an essential role in tumorigenesis, neoangiogenesis, disease progression, therapy-resistant minimal residual disease (MRD), cancer metastasis and relapse. Currently, most CTC detection techniques are restricted to the indistinguishable quantification of circulating rare cells, including both necrotic and viable cells in cancer patients. Clinically imperative demands to distinguish and detect live and/or dead non-hematological aneuploid cancer cells in peripheral blood, which will assist in the rapid evaluation of therapeutic effects, real-time monitoring of treatment resistance longitudinally developed along with therapy and the effective detection of post-therapeutic MRD, have not yet been achieved. The integrated subtraction enrichment and immunostaining-fluorescence in situ hybridization (SE-iFISH)-derived novel strategy was developed in this study, aiming to precisely identify and detect live and necrotic cancer cells (NC) enriched from carcinoma patients’ biofluids. The innovative SE-iFISH (NC) provides a meaningful and practical approach to co-detect various viable and necrotic aneuploid CTCs and CTECs. The detected circulating rare cells can be characterized and categorized into diverse subtypes based upon cell viability, morphology, multiple tumor markers’ expression, and the degree of aneuploidy relevant to both malignancy and therapeutic resistance. Each subtype of live or necrotic CTCs and CTECs possesses distinct utility in anti-cancer drug development, translational research, and clinical practice.

Role of aneuploid circulating tumor cells and CD31+ circulating tumor endothelial cells in predicting and monitoring anti-angiogenic therapy efficacy in advanced NSCLC.

Prognosticating the efficacy of anti‐angiogenic therapy through longitudinal monitoring and early detection of treatment resistance in cancer patients remain highly challenging. In this study, co‐detection and comprehensive phenotypic and karyotypic molecular characterization of aneuploid circulating tumor cells (CTCs) and circulating tumor endothelial cells (CTECs) were conducted on non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients receiving bevacizumab plus chemotherapy. Prognostic values of the cell‐based significant univariate risk factors identified by Cox regression analyses were progressively investigated. Subjects showing an increase in total post‐therapeutic platelet endothelial cell adhesion molecule‐1 (CD31)– CTCs and CD31+ CTECs exhibited a significantly reduced median progression‐free survival (mPFS) and overall survival. Further stratification analyses indicated that pretherapeutic patients bearing vimentin (Vim)+ CTECs (mesenchymal M‐type) at baseline revealed a significantly shortened mPFS compared with patients with Vim– CTECs. Post‐therapeutic patients harboring epithelial cell adhesion molecule (EpCAM)+ CTCs and CTECs (epithelial E‐type), regardless of Vim expression or not, showed a significantly reduced mPFS. Post‐therapeutic patients possessing de novo EpCAM+/Vim+ (hybrid E/M‐type) CTECs displayed the shortest mPFS. Patients harboring either pre‐ or post‐therapeutic EpCAM–/Vim– null CTECs (N‐type) exhibited a better response to therapy compared to patients harboring EpCAM+ and/or Vim+ CTECs. The presented results support the notion that baseline Vim+ CTECs and post‐therapeutic EpCAM+ CTCs and CTECs are predictive biomarkers for longitudinal monitoring of response to anti‐angiogenesis combination regimens in NSCLC patients.

Circulating tumor cells (CTCs)/circulating tumor endothelial cells (CTECs) and their subtypes in small cell lung cancer: Predictors for response and prognosis.

BackgroundThe aim of the study was to define the clinical significance of circulating tumor cells (CTCs)/circulating tumor endothelial cells (CTECs) and their subtypes in small cell lung cancer (SCLC) patients.MethodsCTCs/CTECs and their subtypes were determined using SE‐iFISH technology in 33 SCLC patients before initial treatment (B1), after two cycles of chemotherapy (B2), at the completion of chemotherapy (B3), and disease progression (B4). The correlations with clinical characteristics, progression‐free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were analyzed.ResultsCTCs and CTECs were detected in 96.6% and 65.5% of patients, respectively. Patients had higher levels of CTCs compared with CTECs in circulation (p < 0.05). Extensive‐stage SCLC patients tended to have higher CTEC counts (p = 0.035), and the detection of CTC‐white blood cell (CTC‐WBC) clusters was associated with a worse response to treatment (p = 0.030). Patients with CTC‐WBC clusters at B1 (17.3 vs. 22.6 months, p = 0.041) and B2 (19.9 vs. 25.2 months, p = 0.018) had significantly shorter OS than those with no detection. Additionally, their presence was revealed as independent predictors for a worse OS in multivariable analyses (B1: HR 9.3, 95% CI: 1.4–48, p = 0.0079; B2: HR 4.4, 95% CI: 1.1–18, p = 0.041). A high CTC level at B4 was an adverse prognostic factor for SCLC patients (PFS: 8.7 vs. 22.5 months, p = 0.0026; OS: 19 months vs. not reached, p = 0.0086). CTC clusters and CTECs also showed prognostic values.ConclusionsThe presence of CTC‐WBC clusters at baseline and after two‐cycle chemotherapy and the total CTC counts at the completion of chemotherapy are strong predictors for the prognostic survival of SCLC patients receiving first‐line treatment.

CD44+ Circulating Tumor Endothelial Cells Indicate Poor Prognosis in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma After Radical Surgery: A Pilot Study.

BackgroundCirculating tumor endothelial cells (CTECs) are cells that originate from tumor endothelial cells (TECs) of blood vessels and are shed into peripheral blood. Some studies have shown that CTECs are associated with tumor angiogenesis, growth and indicate prognosis in patients with malignant solid tumor. However, the role of CTECs especially the phenotype of CTECs in pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is still not clear. We investigated the relationship between CTECs and patients’ prognosis.MethodsA total of 73 patients with resectable PDAC were enrolled in our research and underwent radical surgery. Peripheral venous blood samples were collected before surgery, on postoperative day (POD) 7 and on postoperative month (POM) 1, respectively. We used integrated subtraction enrichment and immunostaining-fluorescence in situ hybridization (SE-iFISH) platform to identify and enumerate CTECs. Immunofluorescence was used to identify CTECs expressing CD44 and vimentin.ResultsIn patients with early tumor recurrence (DFS< 6 months), the preoperative CD44+ CTEC levels showed significantly higher (P = 0.023). Univariate and multivariate analysis showed that history of diabetes [HR 2.656 (1.194–5.908), P = 0.017], numbers of positive lymph nodes [HR 1.871 (1.388–2.522), P < 0.001], preoperative numbers of CD44+ CTECs [HR 1.216 (1.064–1.390), P = 0.004], and POM1 CA19-9 level [HR 1.002 (1.001–1.002), P < 0.001] were independent prognostic factors for DFS.ConclusionThe detection of CD44+CTECs in patients with resectable PDAC preoperatively could be an independent predictor of shorter DFS after radical surgery.

PD-L1+ aneuploid circulating tumor endothelial cells (CTECs) exhibit resistance to the checkpoint blockade immunotherapy in advanced NSCLC patients.

Sustained angiogenesis and increased PD-L1 expression on endothelial and carcinoma cells contribute toward fostering an immunosuppressive microenvironment suitable for tumor growth. PD-L1+ CTCs were reported to associate with poor prognosis in NSCLC patients. However, whether or not aneuploid circulating tumor endothelial cells (CTECs) express PD-L1, then serve as a surrogate biomarker to evaluate immunotherapy efficacy remains unknown. In this study, a novel SE-iFISH strategy was established to comprehensively quantify and characterize a full spectrum of aneuploid CTCs and CTECs in advanced NSCLC patients subjected to second-line anti-PD-1 (nivolumab) immunotherapy. In situ co-detection of diverse subtypes of aneuploid CTCs and CTECs expressing PD-L1 and Vimentin was performed. The present clinical study demonstrated that significant amounts of PD-L1+ aneuploid CTCs and CTECs could be detected in histopathologic hPD-L1- patients. In contrast to decreased PD-L1+ CTCs, the number of multiploid PD-L1+ CTECs (≥tetrasomy 8) undergoing post-therapeutic karyotype shifting increased in patients along with tumor progression following anti-PD-1 treatment. Progressive disease (PD) lung cancer patients possessing multiploid PD-L1+ CTECs had a significantly shorter PFS compared to those without PD-L1+ CTECs. In carcinoma patients, aneuploid CTCs and CTECs may exhibit a functional interplay with respect to tumor angiogenesis, progression, metastasis, and response to immunotherapy.

Comprehensive in situ co-detection of aneuploid circulating endothelial and tumor cells

Conventional circulating tumor cell (CTC) detection strategies rely on cell surface marker EpCAM and intracellular cytokeratins (CKs) for isolation and identification, respectively. Application of such methods is considerably limited by inherent heterogeneous and dynamic expression or absence of EpCAM and/or CKs in CTCs. Here, we report a novel strategy, integrating antigen-independent subtraction enrichment and immunostaining-FISH (SE-iFISH), to detect a variety of aneuploid circulating rare cells (CRCs), including CTCs and circulating tumor endothelial cells (CECs). Enriched CRCs, maintained at high viability and suitable for primary tumor cell culture, are comprehensively characterized by in situ co-examination of chromosome aneuploidy by FISH and immunostaining of multiple biomarkers displayed in diverse fluorescence channels. We described and quantified for the first time the existence of individual aneuploid CD31+ CECs and co-existence of “fusion clusters” of endothelial-epithelial aneuploid tumor cells among enriched non-hematopoietic CRCs. Hence, SE-iFISH is feasible for efficient co-detection and in situ phenotypic and karyotypic characterization as well as quantification of various CRCs, allowing for their classification into diverse subtypes upon biomarker expression and chromosome ploidy. Enhanced SE-iFISH technology, assisted by the Metafer-iFISH automated CRC imaging system, provides a platform for the analysis of potential contributions of each subtype of CRCs to distinct clinical outcome.

A subpopulation of circulating endothelial cells express CD109 and is enriched in the blood of cancer patients.

BackgroundThe endothelium is not a homogeneous organ. Endothelial cell heterogeneity has been described at the level of cell morphology, function, gene expression, and antigen composition. As a consequence of the genetic, transcriptome and surrounding environment diversity, endothelial cells from different vascular beds have differentiated functions and phenotype. Detection of circulating endothelial cells (CECs) by flow cytometry is an approach widely used in cancer patients, and their number, viability and kinetic is a promising tool to stratify patient receiving anti-angiogenic treatment.Methodology/Principal FindingsCurrently CECs are identified as positive for a nuclear binding antigen (DNA+), negative for the pan leukocyte marker CD45, and positive for CD31 and CD146. Following an approach recently validated in our laboratory, we investigated the expression of CD109 on CECs from the peripheral blood of healthy subject and cancer patients. The endothelial nature of these cells was validated by RT-PCR for the presence of m-RNA level of CDH5 (Ve-Cadherin) and CLDN5 (Claudin5), two endothelial specific transcripts. Before treatment, significantly higher levels of CD109+ CECs and viable CD109+CECs were found in breast cancer patients and glioblastoma patients compared to healthy controls, and their number significantly decreased after treatment. Higher levels of endothelial specific transcripts expressed in developing endothelial cells CLEC14a, TMEM204, ARHGEF15, GPR116, were observed in sorted CD109+CECs when compared to sorted CD146+CECs, suggesting that these genes can play an important role not only during embryogenesis but also in adult angiogenesis. Interestingly, mRNA levels of TEM8 (identified as Antrax Toxin Receptor1, Antrax1) were expressed in CD109+CECs+ but not in CD146+CECs.ConclusionTaken together our results suggest that CD109 represent a rare population of circulating tumor endothelial cells, that play a potentially useful prognostic role in patients with glioblastoma. The role of CD109 expression in cancer vessel-specific endothelial cells deserves to be further investigated by gene expression studies.