Circular Stapler Research Articles

Short-term outcomes depending on type of oesophagojejunostomy in laparoscopic total gastrectomy for gastric cancer: retrospective study based on a Korean Nationwide Survey for Gastric Cancer in 2019.

The study aimed to assess postoperative complication rates of different oesophagojejunostomy (EJ) techniques used in laparoscopic total gastrectomy for gastric cancer. A total of 1155 patients who underwent laparoscopic total gastrectomy were retrospectively selected from the data obtained from the Korean Nationwide Survey for gastric cancer in 2019. Morbidity rate was compared between patients who received intracorporeal or extracorporeal EJ using linear or circular staplers during laparoscopic total gastrectomy. The variables of the groups were balanced using the inverse probability of treatment weighting. Seven hundred and seventy-three patients received intracorporeal EJ using a linear stapler (IL), 137 received intracorporeal EJ using a circular stapler (IC), 134 received extracorporeal EJ using a linear stapler (EL) and 111 received extracorporeal EJ using a circular stapler (EC). The overall complication rates were lower in the extracorporeal group (EL: 13.4% versus EC: 12.6%) compared to the intracorporeal group (IL: 22.6% versus IC: 17.5%) (P = 0.006). Fewer major complications were observed in the extracorporeal group (EL: 1.4% versus EC: 1.8%) compared to the intracorporeal group (IL: 9.4% versus IC: 7.3%) (P = 0.004). There was no significant difference in EJ-related complications between the groups (P = 0.418 in EJ leakage and P = 0.474 in EJ stricture). Multivariable analysis showed that the IL method correlated with more overall and major complications than the extracorporeal method. The results of this study suggest that despite its widespread use, the IL method is a challenging procedure with higher complication rates than the extracorporeal method. Further high-quality studies are required to confirm the results.

Preliminary application results of laparoscopic assisted proximal gastrectomy λ-shaped double tract anastomosis

Objective: To share the results of laparoscopic assisted proximal gastrectomy λ- shaped modified double tract reconstruction. Method: This study retrospectively included 3 patients during January 2024 from the Department of Gastric Surgery at the First Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing Medical University using the λ-shaped modified double tract reconstruction. The procedure of the λ-shaped modified double tract reconstruction is as follows. After completing proximal gastrectomy, the jejunum is transected 15 cm from the Treitz ligament. A suture is made 18-20 cm from the distal jejunum to mark the esophagojejunal anastomosis site. A circular stapler anvil is inserted through the distal jejunum, and the remaining end of the jejunum is turned to the right. The circular stapler is pierced through the marked site for an esophagojejunal end-to-end anastomosis, which is reinforced with a barbed suture continuously. A 60mm linear stapler is used to close the remaining end of the jejunum. We then mark the gastric side of the gastrojejunal anastomosis with suture in the middle of the anterior wall of the residual stomach, and mark the jejunal side of the gastrojejunal anastomosis at a distance of about 2 cm and 8 cm from the residual end of the distal jejunum. We make an opening of about 0.5 cm and use a 60 mm linear stapler to perform anastomosis on the jejunal side of the anterior wall of the residual stomach according to the markings, so that the distance between the esophagojejunal anastomosis and the gastrojejunal anastomosis is 10-12 cm. The common opening is closed with barbed wire. About 50 cm below the esophagojejunal anastomosis, the small intestine opening is anastomosed side to side using a circular stapler and the common opening is closed. Return the jejunum into the abdominal cavity to complete the reconstruction of the λ-shaped double tract reconstruction. We analyzed the surgery and postoperative conditions, including surgery time, anastomosis time, intraoperative bleeding, tumor size and pathology, postoperative mobilization, passage of gas and water intake time, discharge time, postoperative complications, and postoperative gastrointestinal imaging to observe the passage of food through the gastric and intestinal loops. Results: Three patients successfully received laparoscopic assisted proximal gastrectomy with λ-shaped modified double tract reconstruction. The surgical time was 155 minutes, 240 minutes, and 160 minutes, respectively; The postoperative time for first ambulation was 20 hours, 18 hours, and 26 hours, respectively. The time for passage of gas was 59 hours, 83 hours, and 75 hours, respectively. The drinking time was 66 hours, 87 hours, and 90 hours, respectively. The postoperative discharge days were all 7 days. No surgical related complications occurred. On the 6th day and 3 months after surgery, gastrointestinal angiography was performed. The contrast agent passed smoothly through the jejunal loop and residual stomach jejunal loop, and both sides were unobstructed. No contrast agent was found to retrograde to the esophagojejunal anastomosis. Conclusion: Laparoscopic assisted proximal gastrectomy with λ-shaped modified double tract reconstruction is safe and feasible, as it improves the diversion of food through the residual stomach while ensuring anti-reflux effects.

Quality control of digestive tract reconstruction after robotic gastrectomy

With features such as high-definition magnification of the surgical field, filtering of hand tremor, and robotic arm with multi-degree-of-freedom rotatable wrist, surgical robot has unique advantages in various aspects of digestive tract reconstruction (DTR) after robotic gastrectomy (RG). Currently, there is still controversy about the selection and standardized application of DTR after RG for gastric cancer. To standardize the selection and implementation of DTR, we describe various aspects of quality control before DTR, selection of indications, principles of DTR, and prevention and management of postoperative complications of DTR. We also comment on the operation details of robotic-assisted and total robotic DTR, including manual suture, linear anastomosis with linear stapler, and circular anastomosis with circular stapler. Meanwhile, we propose our prospects on the potential application of new technology in robotic DTR for gastric cancer.

Rectal stenosis after circular mechanical anastomosis; the influence of stapler size.

The incidence of benign anastomotic stenosis (BAS) after radical surgery for rectal cancer ranges from 2 to 30%. There are few data regarding the factors related to its occurrence. One of these factors is the diameter of the circular mechanical staplers (CMS) used. Observational study with prospective data recording of consecutive patients with non-disseminated rectal cancer operated on at two hospitals with special dedication to rectal cancer. Patients underwent low anterior resection (LAR) of the rectum with colorectal anastomosis created using CMS of diameters of either 28-29 or 31-33mm. The primary endpoint was BAS. Secondary variables were demographic and patient-dependent data, and preoperative, intraoperative, immediate postoperative and mid-term data. The incidence of BAS was compared in the groups in which the different stapler diameters were used. Between 2012 and 2022, 239 patients were included. BAS was recorded in 39 (16.3%). In the analysis of factors related to its occurrence, the only significant variable was stapler diameter (p = 0.002, 95% CI 7.27-23.53), since rates of BAS were lower in the 31-33mm group. Similarly, in the logistic regression analysis, stapler size was not associated with postoperative complications or anastomotic dehiscence (OR 3.5, 95% CI 1.2-10.5). Comparing stapler groups, BAS was detected in 35 of 165 patients (21%) in the 28-29mm group but in only four out of 74 (5.6%) in the 31-33mm group (p = 0.002, 95% CI 7.27-23.53). Ileostomy closure took longer and was less frequent in the 28-29mm group. The rate of BAS after LAR was not negligible, since it was recorded in 39 of 239 patients (16.3%). The use of a 31-33mm CMS was associated with a lower incidence of BAS. Therefore, the use of larger staplers is tentatively recommended; however, clinical trials are now required to confirm these results.

Esophagojejunostomy using a circular stapler vs. a linear stapler for gastric cardia cancer patients: impact of upper margin length and tumor size on the survival rate.

The incidence of gastric cancer is concomitantly rising with gastric cardia cancer worldwide. While the improvement of gastric cancer surgical techniques is glowing, this study assesses the impact of the upper margin length and tumor size on the survival rate for gastric cardia cancer patients who underwent total laparoscopic total gastrectomy(TLTG) or laparoscopic assisted total gastrectomy(LATG). A total of 63 patients with gastric cardia cancer who underwent laparoscopic total gastrectomy were retro-prospectively collected from January 2021 to May 2023. While assessing the impact of upper margin length and tumor size on the survival rate, esophagojejunostomy using a linear stapler has been compared to a circular stapler. The sixty-three patients met inclusion criteria; 32 (51%) underwent LATG and 31 (49%) underwent TLTG. Their mean age was 65 years (range, 45-77). The blood loss means in LATG and TLTG was 74.69 and 50.16 ml, respectively (p = 0.005), and surgery duration was higher in LATG than LATG with respective means of 247 min and 222.42 min. (p = 0.006). However, the tumor size means (p = 0.5), and upper margin length means (p = 0.052) were not significantly different in the LATG and TLTG groups, respectively. The number of resected and assessed lymph node was adequate in the LATG and TLTG groups. The current study still does not find an independent related risk from the upper margin length and tumor size to the survival rate according to the multiple regression analysis (p = 0.080). The upper margin length and tumor size do not have a relationship with the survival rate of the compared esophagojejunostomy (EJS) methods. The EJS using a linear stapler requires a shorter surgery duration and less blood loss than EJS using a circular stapler.

Single-port laparoscopic reversal of Hartmann's procedure through the colostomy site: technical aspects and early postoperative outcomes.

Single-port laparoscopic surgical approaches offer improved cosmetic outcomes and enhance recovery following surgery. The purpose of the study was to assess the reliability and efficacy of a single-port laparoscopic Hartmann's reversal(SPL-HR) through the colostomy site. Prospective data from consecutive patients who underwent SPL-HR between 2020 and 2024 was analysed. Once the colostomy was detached from abdominal wall, a single-port device was introduced through the colostomy site. After mobilizing the rectal stump and afferent colon, colorectal anastomosis was carried out using a circular stapler transanally under laparoscopic vision. Postoperative care and discharge decisions were made following the ERAS protocol. Patient demographics, details of Hartmann's procedure, intraoperative outcomes, and early postoperative outcomes were evaluated. SPL-HR was successfully performed in 23 of 27 patients (85.1%), with a median operation time of 92 (50-172) min and a median blood loss of 100 (10-360) mL. Five patients (21.7%) experienced a postoperative complication. Two of them experienced grade 3a complications according to Clavien-Dindo classification: one with an intraabdominal abscess and one with a hematoma at the colostomy site, both requiring drainage under local anaesthesia. Anastomotic leak or mortality wasn't observed in patients. Functional recovery measures such as first flatus time and time to resuming a soft diet were favourable, with a median length of hospital stay of 4 (2-9) days. The SPL-HR technique is a reliable and efficient method that is easy to perform. It has acceptable complication rates while improving postoperative recovery and reducing the length of hospital stay.

Gastric conduit reconstruction after esophagectomy.

A high risk of complications still accompanies gastric conduit reconstruction after esophagectomy. In this narrative review, we summarize the technological progress and the problems of gastric conduit reconstruction after esophagectomy. Several types of gastric conduits exist, including the whole stomach and the narrow gastric tube. The clinical outcomes are similar between the two types of conduits. Sufficient blood supply to the conduit is mandatory for a successful esophageal reconstruction. Recently, due to the availability of equipment and its convenience, indocyanine green angiography has been rapidly spreading. When the blood perfusion of the planning anastomotic site is insufficient, several techniques, such as the Kocher maneuver, pedunculated gastric tube with duodenal transection, and additional microvascular anastomosis, exist to decrease the risk of anastomotic failure. There are two different anastomotic sites, cervical and thoracic, and mainly two reconstructive routes, retrosternal and posterior mediastinal routes. Meta-analyses showed no significant difference in outcomes between the anastomotic sites as well as the reconstructive routes. Anastomotic techniques include hand-sewn, circular, and linear stapling. Anastomoses using linear stapling is advantageous in decreasing anastomosis-related complications. Arteriosclerosis and poorly controlled diabetes are the risk factors for anastomotic leakage, while a narrow upper mediastinal space and a damaged stomach predict leakage. Although standardization among the institutional team members is essential to decrease anastomotic complications, surgeons should learn several technical options for predictable or unpredictable intraoperative situations.

Laparoscopic right gastroepiploic artery-sparing distal gastric tube resection with lymph node dissection for gastric tube cancer after esophagectomy: A novel surgical approach (with video).

Total resection of the gastric tube with lymphadenectomy for advanced gastric tube cancer is highly invasive and associated with severe complications. Other surgical option, partial gastrectomy or wedge resection, is insufficient if lymph node metastasis is suspected. Therefore, a technique balancing invasiveness and curability is required. First, we laparoscopically peeled off adhesions of the gastric tube, gastric mesentery (including the right gastroepiploic artery/vein), pericardial membrane, and aorta, up to the planned resection line. Subsequently, we cut the infrapyloric and right gastric arteries at their roots and dissected No. 5 and No. 6 lymph nodes. We taped and spared the right gastroepiploic artery and vein and dissected the tissues including No. 4d lymph nodes. Finally, the gastric tube was cut using a linear stapler, and the remaining gastric tube was anastomosed to the jejunum with a circular stapler. The mean operative time for the three cases treated using this intervention was 729 min. The patients were discharged on postoperative day 8 or 9 without any complications. They all remained alive and recurrence-free. This novel approach balances invasiveness and curability by leveraging the advantages of laparoscopy. The procedure was performed safely and reproducibly in three consecutive cases, providing another viable option for the treatment of gastric tube cancer.

Effect of powered circular stapler in colorectal anastomosis after left-sided colic resection: systematic review and meta-analysis

PurposeAnastomotic leak (AL) remains the most important complication after left-sided colic anastomoses and technical complications during anastomotic construction are responsible of higher leakage incidence. Powered circular stapler (PCS) in colorectal surgery has been introduced in order to reduce technical errors and post-operative complications due to the manual circular stapler (MCS).MethodsA systematic review and meta-analysis were performed. An electronic systematic search was performed using Web of Science, PubMed, and Embase of studies comparing PCS and MCS. The incidence of AL, anastomotic bleeding (AB), conversion, and reoperation were assessed. PROSPERO Registration Number: CRD42024512644.ResultsFive observational studies were eligible for inclusion reporting on 2379 patients. The estimated pooled Risk Ratios for AL and AB rates following PCS were significantly lower than those observed with MCS (0.44 and 0.23, respectively; both with p < 0.01). Conversion and reoperation rate did not show any significant difference: 0.41 (95% CI 0.09–1.88; p = 0.25) and 0.78 (95% CI 0.33–1.84; p = 0.57); respectively.ConclusionThe use of PCS demonstrates a lower incidence of AL and AB compared to MCS but does not exhibit a discernible influence on reintervention or conversion rates. The call for future randomized clinical trials aims to definitively clarify these issues and contribute to further advancements in refining surgical strategies for left-sided colonic resection.

Optimizing the technical results of robotic esophagectomy: conduit creation and esophagogastric anastomoses

The esophagectomy, first done over a century ago, has evolved from open procedures to minimally invasive techniques. As minimally invasive surgery has progressed in both safety and efficiency since its inception, it is becoming increasingly favored and continues to demonstrate advantageous outcomes over open techniques. In terms of operative decisions, conduit diameter choice is crucial in esophagectomy. Narrower conduits (≤ 3 cm) seem to be more efficacious, and less prone to stricture than their wider counterparts (&gt; 5 cm). Perfusion assessment, notably with indocyanine green (ICG), is still a topic of debate among surgeons with conflicting opinions on ICG’s impact. There are varying results in leak rates; however, the use of ICG in determining anastomotic site seems to exert some influence on surgical decision-making. Anastomotic techniques, such as circular stapling and linear stapling, have shown to be preferred over more traditional hand-sewn methods. At our institution, a completely robotic approach is used with creation of a 3-4 cm wide conduit and hybrid-type anastomosis. ICG is used to guide conduit transection and gastrotomy for anastomosis. Our experience shows that this approach offers an excellent combination of safety and reproducibility.

The impact of powered circular staplers on anastomotic leak in left-sided colorectal cancer surgeries

BackgroundSince the introduction of powered circular staplers in colorectal surgery, there has been growing interest in their impact on reducing complications, particularly anastomotic leakage. This study compared short-term postoperative outcomes between powered and manual circular staplers.MethodsThis retrospective study included colorectal cancer patients at the tertiary referral center from April to October 2023 who underwent anterior or low anterior resection (LAR) using a circular stapler. According to energy source, patients were divided into powered and manual groups, which used two powered and four types of manual staplers, respectively. All open, laparoscopic, and robotic approaches were included. Propensity score matching (PSM) analysis was used to reduce selection bias. Postoperative complications within 30 days, especially for anastomosis-related complications, were compared between the groups.ResultsAmong 511 patients, the powered group was 161 (32%). After PSM, 143 pairs of 286 patients were analyzed. The proportions of LAR were 53.8% and 51.0%, and initial diverting stoma rates were 23.1% and 22.4% for the Powered and Manual groups, respectively. Comprehensive complication rates were similar between the Powered group and the Manual group, without statistical significance (13.3% vs. 21.0%, P = 0.063). Anastomotic leakage was not different between the Powered and Manual groups (4.2% vs. 4.9%, P = 0.782). There was no significant difference in other complications, including anastomotic bleeding, ileus, surgical site infection, and intra-abdominal hematoma.ConclusionsThe study implies that powered circular staplers may not significantly reduce postoperative complications, including anastomotic leakages, compared to manual staplers in colorectal surgery of high-volume centers.Graphical

Anastomotic leak after manual circular stapled left-sided bowel surgery: analysis of technology-, disease-, and patient-related factors.

Anastomotic leak rates after colorectal surgery remain high. In most left-sided colon and rectal resection surgeries, a circular stapler is utilized to create the primary bowel anastomosis. However, it remains unclear whether a relationship between circular stapler technology and anastomotic leak in left-sided colorectal surgery exists. A post-hoc analysis was conducted using a prospectively collected data set of patients from the 2017 European Society of Coloproctology snapshot audit who underwent elective left-sided resection (left hemicolectomy, sigmoid colectomy, or rectal resection) with a manual circular stapled anastomosis. Rates of anastomotic leak and unplanned intensive care unit stay in association with manual circular stapling were assessed. Patient-, disease-, geographical-, and surgeon-related factors as well as stapler brand were explored using multivariable regression models to identify predictors of adverse outcomes. Across 3305 procedures, 8.0% of patients had an anastomotic leak and 2.1% had an unplanned intensive care unit stay. Independent predictors of anastomotic leak were male sex, minimal-access surgery converted to open surgery, and anastomosis height C11 (lower third rectum) (all P < 0.050). Independent predictors of unplanned intensive care unit stay were minimal-access surgery converted to open surgery and American Society of Anesthesiologists grade IV (all P < 0.050). Stapler device brand was not a predictor of anastomotic leak or unplanned intensive care unit stay in multivariable regression analysis. There were no differences in rates of anastomotic leak and unplanned intensive care unit stay according to stapler head diameter, geographical region, or surgeon experience. In patients undergoing left-sided bowel anastomosis, choice of manual circular stapler, in terms of manufacturer or head diameter, is not associated with rates of anastomotic leak and unplanned intensive care unit stay.

Postoperative recovery after suspension suture placement at the site of esophagojejunal anastomosis after total gastrectomy: Comparison of two surgical techniques.

Despite improvements, survival rates for gastric cancer remain low, even in developed countries, confirming the role of primary and secondary prevention. This study aims to demonstrate the role of additional suspension sutures on the esophagojejunal anastomosis (EJA) to strengthen the anastomosis, i.e., relieve the mechanical suture. A retrospective cohort study was conducted from 2011 to 2022 at the Clinic for Surgery, University Clinical Center Tuzla, Bosnia and Herzegovina. The experimental group consisted of patients placed with a suspension suture at the esophagojejunal anastomosis (EJA) site after total gastrectomy. The control group was patients without a suspension suture. The clinical and laboratory parameters available from the medical history were analyzed, X-ray passage, surgical complications, non-surgical complications, the length of hospitalization, the postoperative course, time of onset of postoperative complications, postoperative radiological follow-up and endoscopic postoperative follow-up were then analyzed. A total of 212 patients were included in the study: 87 in the experimental group with suspension sutures on the EJA and 125 in the control group without suspension sutures on the EJA. The two cohorts did not differ in other clinicopathologic parameters except perineural invasion, which was more prevalent in the control group. Patients in both groups were anemic and elevated values of C reactive protein (CRP) and decreased levels of proteins, albumin and globulin, with no significant difference between the two groups. The most common general complication was pleural effusion (28%), followed by pneumonia (∼22%). The most common complication in the experimental group was an intraabdominal abscess, while in the control group, it was a surgical wound infection. Our study did not show a statistically significant difference between the two analyzed EJA techniques created with a circular stapler, when it comes to postoperative course and outcome in patients with gastric cancer.

510. INNOVATIVE ROBOTIC-ASSISTED ESOPHAGECTOMY WITH THREE-FIELD LYMPHADENECTOMY: A NOVEL APPROACH TO ESOPHAGEAL CANCER SURGERY

Abstract Background Esophageal squamous cell carcinoma, the predominant form of esophageal cancer in Thailand, often presents at advanced stages (III - IV), necessitating surgical intervention. Radical esophagectomy, including three-field lymphadenectomy, stands as one of the most invasive gastrointestinal surgeries. However, in the era of minimally invasive surgery (MIS), robotic systems have emerged as a formidable approach to achieve radical treatment goals while minimizing surgical invasiveness. This video showcases a novel surgical technique and its challenges. Methods A case of mid-thoracic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma, clinically staged III, treated via robotic-assisted esophagectomy and three-field lymphadenectomy using the Da Vinci Xi system. The operation encompassed three phases: Initially, the thoracic phase with patient in semi-prone position with three robotic and one assistant trocars for complete esophageal mobilization and mediastinal lymph node retrieval. The abdominal phase, followed by the cervical phase, utilized four robotic trocars and one assistant trocar in supine position with hyperextended neck, facilitating perigastric lymph node retrieval, gastric tube reconstruction via the posterior mediastinal route, and cervical esophago-gastric tube anastomosis using a circular stapler. Results The patient experienced an uneventful recovery. Postoperative esophagogastroduodenoscopy on day 1 revealed the integrity of the anastomosis and normal vocal cord function. Imaging conducted on day 7 confirmed that the anastomosis was patent without any leakage. Surgical outcomes included an operative time of 615 minutes, estimated blood loss of 150 ml, a 14-day hospital stay, and recovery without complications. This video highlights the intricacies of the procedure and the robotic system's ability to access anatomically challenging spaces, thereby minimizing surgical invasiveness and enhancing recovery. Conclusion The robotic system is capable of performing radical procedures in anatomically challenging areas, such as narrow spaces and areas requiring precise maneuverability among vital structures. It enables a comprehensive approach spanning from the upper to the lower thoracic regions and diversity of surgery in thoracic and abdominal cavity. Additionally, this presentation highlights unique surgical tips and techniques that enhance the safety and feasibility of robotic-assisted esophagectomy. By significantly reducing surgical errors and optimizing outcomes for both oncologic and minimally invasive surgeries, it thereby marks a significant leap forward in the field of esophageal surgery. https://drive.google.com/file/d/1vrmu2D8TGoetnplcREPWQocXJle4PrOX/view?usp=share_link

320. RISK FACTORS FOR BENIGN ANASTOMOTIC STENOSIS AFTER ESOPHAGEAL CANCER SURGERY

Abstract Background Benign strictures occur frequently following an esophagectomy, causing dysphagia, problems with eating, and a diminished overall quality of life. The aim of this study is to identify risk factors associated with anastomotic stenosis specified for anastomotic technique following esophagectomy for cancer. Methods This retrospective study included patients with esophageal and gastroesophageal junction cancer who underwent esophagectomy in a tertiary referral center between 2012 and 2022. Intrathoracic and cervical anastomoses were analyzed separately. Benign anastomotic stenosis was defined as the occurrence of postoperative dysphagia for which at least 1 endoscopic anastomotic dilation was needed. Possible predictive factors for anastomotic stenosis were analyzed with uni- and multivariate logistic regression. Results This study included 902 patients: 605 with an intrathoracic and 297 with a cervical anastomosis. Anastomotic stenosis was observed in 18.4% and 49.8% (p&amp;lt;0.001). Patients respectively requiring a median 4 and 7 dilations (p=0.001). Median of time to anastomotic stenosis was 99 and 78 days (p=0.001). In multivariate analysis of intrathoracic anastomosis, anastomotic leakage was a significant risk factor for stenosis (OR 2.034; 95% CI [1.116-3.708]). In patients without anastomotic leakage, stapler size 29mm was a negative predictor (OR 0.444; 95% CI [1.116-3.708]), immunosuppressants (OR 3.492; 95% CI [1.186-10.279]) and chronic pulmonary disease were significant risk factors (OR 2.717; 95% CI [1.293-5.707]). In multivariate analysis of cervical anastomosis, circular stapled anastomosis was a negative predictor (OR 0.350 95% [CI 0.188-0.652]) for stenosis. Conclusion This study identified the most important risk factors for anastomotic stricture after esophagectomy. Anastomotic leakage, the circular stapler diameter, and the circular stapled technique are factors that could be surgical modifiable, while patients taking immunosuppressants and with chronic pulmonary disease should be counseled for higher risk of stenosis.

465. INNOVATION TO STANDARDIZATION OF THORACOLAPAROSCOPIC ESOPHAGECTOMY: CULMINATION OF THREE DECADES OF EXPERIENCE

Abstract Minimally invasive esophagectomy has seen a great deal of evolution over the last three decades. As one of the earliest adopters of minimally invasive approach for esophagectomy, we present our experience and the lessons we have learnt in over 1300 cases. We adopted the prone position and later modified to mid prone position for the thoracic phase of esophagectomy. This position has several advantages of better exposure due to gravity aided retraction of the lungs, clear operating field as blood trickles away as well as feasibility of rapid conversion to open thoracotomy in emergencies. A major transformation in our surgery was the technical modifications and the extent of mediastinal lymphadenectomy. With refinements in technique and greater understanding of the lymphatic spread, we evolved from standard to extended and even total mediastinal lymphadenectomy improving the oncological outcomes without increasing the operative morbidity. The mean total lymph node yield is over 35. Recurrent laryngeal nerve injury was noted in 7% of cases. The technique of anastomosis was also extensively modified from hand sewn to circular stapler to semi mechanical and finally fully mechanical side to side anastomosis using triangulation technique. The triangulation technique has led to significant reduction in leak rates to less than 5% and stricture formation (&amp;lt;1%). Finally, our innovative railroading technique for specimen extraction through the neck is oncologically safe that avoids large incisions in the chest or abdomen. The 30 day mortality rate is less than 1%

Usefulness of a powered circular stapler compared with a manual circular stapler in patients undergoing colorectal cancer surgery: A retrospective cohort study and systematic review.

Postoperative complications related to anastomosis, including postoperative anastomotic bleeding and anastomotic leakage, remain a serious issue. The effect of anastomotic devices on suture complications during intestinal anastomosis remains unclear. The present study examined the utility of automated anastomotic devices for reducing anastomotic complication risks. A retrospective cohort study of colorectal cancer surgeries in which an anastomosis device was used at Osaka University Hospital (Suita, Japan) between January 2018 and December 2022 was conducted. Cases of emergency surgery, inflammatory bowel disease and simultaneous surgery for other cancers were excluded. Experienced gastrointestinal surgeons performed manual anastomosis using the ETHICON Circular Stapler CDH or EEA Circular Stapler, and automatic anastomosis using the ECHELON CIRCULAR Powered Stapler, with no observed operator bias. Additionally, a meta-analysis that included other study results was performed. The outcomes included postoperative complications, mainly anastomotic leakage. The study included 414 patients: 183 in the manual circular stapler group and 231 in the powered circular stapler (PCS) group. Although this retrospective study found no statistically significant association between the anastomotic device used and anastomotic complications, an increased risk ratio was observed in the manual group compared with the automatic group when restricted to elderly patients. Similarly, a meta-analysis found a significantly higher anastomotic complication risk in the manual group compared with the automatic group (random-effects model; odds ratio, 0.376; 95% confidence interval, 0.232-0.610; P<0.0001). The findings of the present study suggested that a PCS is useful for reducing the anastomotic complication risk in patients undergoing colorectal cancer surgery.

Risk factors for and treatment of anastomotic strictures after Ivor Lewis esophagectomy.

Anastomotic strictures following esophagectomy occur frequently and impact on nutrition and quality of life. Although strictures are often attributed to ischemia and anastomotic leaks, the role of anastomosis size and pyloroplasty is not well evaluated. Our study aims to assess the rate of and risk factors for anastomotic stricture following esophagectomy, and the impact of treatment with regular endoscopic balloon dilatations. Consecutive patients (n = 207) undergoing Ivor Lewis esophagectomy performed by two surgeons at our institution were included. Data on patient demographics, surgical outcomes and anastomotic strictures were recorded. Relationship of anastomotic strictures with circular stapler size, pyloroplasty and anastomotic leak was analyzed. Treatment of strictures with endoscopic balloon dilatation was reviewed and percentage weight loss at 1 year was evaluated. Anastomotic strictures occurred in 17.4% of patients. Patient demographics between those with and without stricture were similar. Stricture rate was similar in patients with or without pyloroplasty (13.9% vs 21.7%, respectively, p = 0.14) and in those with or without an anastomotic leak (25.0% vs 16.6%, respectively, p = 0.345). Stricture risk increased with smaller sized stapler (25mm = 33.3%, 28mm = 15.3%, 31mm = 4.8%; p = 0.027). The median number of dilatations required to fully treat strictures was 2 (IQR: 1-3). The median length of time from surgery to first dilatation was 2.9 months (IQR: 2.0-4.7) and to last dilatation was 6.1 months (IQR: 4.8-10.0). Median maximum dilatation diameter was 20mm (IQR: 18.0-20.0). There were no complications from dilatations. Percentage weight loss at 1 year in patients with strictures was similar to those without strictures (8.7% vs 11.1%, respectively, p = 0.090). Post-esophagectomy anastomotic strictures are common and not necessarily related to anastomotic leaks or absence of pyloroplasty. Smaller anastomosis size was strongly linked with stricture formation. A driven approach with regular endoscopic balloon dilation is safe and effective in treating these strictures with no excess weight loss at 1 year once treated.

Systemic assessment of manual circular stapler versus powered circular stapler for anastomosis in rectal cancer: A large-scale Chinese multicenter prospective cohort study.

Mechanical anastomosis in rectal cancer surgery offers several advantages but is plagued by complications like leaks and strictures. Variations in surgeons' experiences affect outcomes, but powered circular anastomosis has emerged as a promising solution, ensuring uniform staple formation and reducing manual manipulation. This multicenter, randomized, parallel-controlled study in China compared IntoCare™'s powered circular staplers (ICS) with manual circular staplers (MCS) in 382 patients (195 ICS, 187 MCS). Both groups had comparable anastomotic leakage rates. ICS significantly reduced anastomosis time while maintaining similar safety profiles. Postoperative recovery and complication rates were closely matched. The use of ICS in rectal cancer surgeries effectively reduces anastomosis time without compromising safety, offering a promising innovation to enhance the efficacy of rectal cancer surgeries while maintaining patient safety.

Reconstruction Techniques and Associated Morbidity in Minimally Invasive Gastrectomy for Cancer: Insights From the GastroBenchmark and GASTRODATA databases.

Various anastomotic and reconstruction techniques are used for minimally invasive total (miTG) and distal gastrectomy (miDG). Their effects on postoperative morbidity have not been extensively studied. MiTG and miDG patients were selected from 9356 oncological gastrectomies performed in 2017-2021 in 43 centers. Endpoints included anastomotic leakage (AL) rate and postoperative morbidity tested by multivariable analysis. Three major anastomotic techniques [circular stapled (CS); linear stapled (LS); and hand sewn (HS)], and 3 major bowel reconstruction types [Roux (RX); Billroth I (BI); Billroth II (BII)] were identified in miTG (n=878) and miDG (n=3334). Postoperative complications, including AL (5.2% vs 1.1%), overall (28.7% vs 16.3%), and major morbidity (15.7% vs 8.2%), as well as 90-day mortality (1.6% vs 0.5%) were higher after miTG compared with miDG. After miTG, the AL rate was higher after CS (4.3%) and HS (7.9%) compared with LS (3.4%). Similarly, major complications (LS: 9.7%, CS: 16.2%, and HS: 12.7%) were lowest after LS. Multivariate analysis confirmed anastomotic technique as a predictive factor for AL, overall, and major complications. In miDG, AL rate (BI: 1.4%, BII 0.8%, and RX 1.2%), overall (BI: 14.5%, BII: 15.0%, and RX: 18.7%), and major morbidity (BI: 7.9%, BII: 9.1%, and RX: 7.2%), and mortality (BI: 0%, BII: 0.1%, and RY: 1.1%%) were not affected by bowel reconstruction. In oncologically suitable situations, miDG should be preferred to miTG, as postoperative morbidity is significantly lower. LS should be a preferred anastomotic technique for miTG in Western Centers. Conversely, bowel reconstruction in DG may be chosen according to the surgeon's preference.