CCA1 Research Articles

Cytokinin affects circadian‐clock oscillation in a phytochrome B‐ and Arabidopsis response regulator 4‐dependent manner

In higher plants, many developmental processes, such as photomorphogenesis and flowering, are coregulated by light and the phytohormone cytokinin. Interactions between light and cytokinin pathways are presumably mediated by common signaling intermediates. However, the molecular mechanism of these interactions remains unclear. Here, we report that cytokinin specifically induces the expression of the Arabidopsis circadian oscillator genes LATE ELONGATED HYPOCOTYL (LHY) and CIRCADIAN CLOCK‐ASSOCIATED 1 (CCA1) but represses the expression of TIMING OF CAB EXPRESSION 1 in a light‐dependent manner. Consistent with these observations, cytokinin causes a shifted phase of the circadian clock. Mutant studies showed that the altered clock oscillation modulated by cytokinin is dependent on phytochrome B (PHYB) and ArabidopsisRESPONSE REGULATOR 4 (ARR4). Whereas overexpression of LHY or CCA1 renders plants slightly more sensitive to cytokinin, phyB and a lhy/cca1 double mutant are less sensitive to the hormone. These results suggest that cytokinin affects the circadian clock oscillation in a PHYB‐ and ARR4‐dependent manner and that cytokinin signaling is also regulated by light‐signaling components, including PHYB, LHY and CCA1. Therefore, phyB, ARR4 and the circadian oscillator may function as signaling intermediates to integrate light and cytokinin pathways.

The Molecular Basis of Temperature Compensation in the Arabidopsis Circadian Clock

Circadian clocks maintain robust and accurate timing over a broad range of physiological temperatures, a characteristic termed temperature compensation. In Arabidopsis thaliana, ambient temperature affects the rhythmic accumulation of transcripts encoding the clock components TIMING OF CAB EXPRESSION1 (TOC1), GIGANTEA (GI), and the partially redundant genes CIRCADIAN CLOCK ASSOCIATED1 (CCA1) and LATE ELONGATED HYPOCOTYL (LHY). The amplitude and peak levels increase for TOC1 and GI RNA rhythms as the temperature increases (from 17 to 27 degrees C), whereas they decrease for LHY. However, as temperatures decrease (from 17 to 12 degrees C), CCA1 and LHY RNA rhythms increase in amplitude and peak expression level. At 27 degrees C, a dynamic balance between GI and LHY allows temperature compensation in wild-type plants, but circadian function is impaired in lhy and gi mutant plants. However, at 12 degrees C, CCA1 has more effect on the buffering mechanism than LHY, as the cca1 and gi mutations impair circadian rhythms more than lhy at the lower temperature. At 17 degrees C, GI is apparently dispensable for free-running circadian rhythms, although partial GI function can affect circadian period. Numerical simulations using the interlocking-loop model show that balancing LHY/CCA1 function against GI and other evening-expressed genes can largely account for temperature compensation in wild-type plants and the temperature-specific phenotypes of gi mutants.

Systems biology flowering in the plant clock field

Mol Syst Biol. 2: 60 In the 18th Century, the Swedish botanist Karl von Linne designed a ‘Flower‐Clock’ by arranging a series of various plant species according to the respective time their flowers open or close every day. Watching this ‘Flower‐Clock’, one can then estimate the time of the day by noting the pattern of flower opening and closing. It has been a well‐known fact since Linne's early times that plants can open or close their flowers at a precise time of the day. However, we still do not fully understand the design principles of the molecular network that underlies the cellular circadian clock, which achieves to predict, often with exquisite precision, the cyclic changes in the environment due to the rotation of earth. In two articles currently published in Molecular Systems Biology , Millar and co‐workers (Locke et al , 2006) and Doyle and co‐workers (Zeilinger et al , 2006) propose a plausible design for the plant circadian clock. In previous work, Millar and co‐workers extended an initial ‘one‐loop model’ of the plant circadian clock into a ‘two‐loop model’ (Figure 1) (Locke et al , 2005). In the simple ‘one‐loop model’ (Figure 1 …

Experimental validation of a predicted feedback loop in the multi‐oscillator clock of Arabidopsis thaliana

Our computational model of the circadian clock comprised the feedback loop between LATE ELONGATED HYPOCOTYL (LHY), CIRCADIAN CLOCK ASSOCIATED 1 (CCA1) and TIMING OF CAB EXPRESSION 1 (TOC1), and a predicted, interlocking feedback loop involving TOC1 and a hypothetical component Y. Experiments based on model predictions suggested GIGANTEA (GI) as a candidate for Y. We now extend the model to include a recently demonstrated feedback loop between the TOC1 homologues PSEUDO-RESPONSE REGULATOR 7 (PRR7), PRR9 and LHY and CCA1. This three-loop network explains the rhythmic phenotype of toc1 mutant alleles. Model predictions fit closely to new data on the gi;lhy;cca1 mutant, which confirm that GI is a major contributor to Y function. Analysis of the three-loop network suggests that the plant clock consists of morning and evening oscillators, coupled intracellularly, which may be analogous to coupled, morning and evening clock cells in Drosophila and the mouse.

Functional Characterization of Phytochrome Interacting Factor 3 for the Arabidopsis thaliana Circadian Clockwork

Light, in a quality- and quantity-dependent fashion, induces nuclear import of the plant photoreceptors phytochromes and promotes interaction of these receptors with transcription factors including PHYTOCHROME INTERACTING FACTOR 3 (PIF3). PIF3 was shown to form in vitro a ternary complex with the G-box element of the promoters of LATE ELONGATED HYPOCOTYL (LHY) and CIRCADIAN CLOCK ASSOCIATED 1 (CCA1) and the Pfr conformer of phytochromes. CCA1 and LHY together with TIMING OF CAB EXPRESSION 1 (TOC1) constitute a transcriptional feed-back loop that is essential for a functional circadian clock in Arabidopsis. These findings led to the hypothesis that the PIF3-containing ternary complex regulates transcription of light-responsive genes and is involved in phototransduction to the central circadian clockwork. Here we report that (i) overexpression or lack of biologically functional PIF3 does not affect period length of rhythmic gene expression or red-light-induced resetting of the circadian clock and (ii) the transcription of PIF3 displays a low-amplitude circadian rhythm. We demonstrated previously that irradiation of etiolated seedlings induces rapid, phytochrome-controlled degradation of PIF3. Here we show that nuclear-localized PIF3 accumulates to relatively high levels by the end of the light phase in seedlings grown under diurnal conditions. Taken together, we show that (i) PIF3 does not play a significant role in controlling light input to and function of the circadian clockwork and (ii) a yet unknown mechanism limits phytochrome-induced degradation of PIF3 at the end of the day under diurnal conditions.

ELF4 is a phytochrome‐regulated component of a negative‐feedback loop involving the central oscillator components CCA1 and LHY

Evidence has been presented that a negative transcriptional feedback loop formed by the genes CIRCADIAN CLOCK ASSOCIATED (CCA1), LATE ELONGATED HYPOCOTYL (LHY) and TIMING OF CAB (TOC1) constitutes the core of the central oscillator of the circadian clock in Arabidopsis. Here we show that these genes are expressed at constant, basal levels in dark-grown seedlings. Transfer to constant red light (Rc) rapidly induces a biphasic pattern of CCA1 and LHY expression, and a reciprocal TOC1 expression pattern over the first 24 h, consistent with initial induction of this synchronous oscillation by the light signal. We have used this assay with wild-type and mutant seedlings to examine the role of these oscillator components, and to determine the function of ELF3 and ELF4 in their light-regulated expression. The data show that whereas TOC1 is necessary for light-induced CCA1/LHY expression, the combined absence of CCA1 and LHY has little effect on the pattern of light-induced TOC1 expression, indicating that the negative regulatory arm of the proposed oscillator is not fully functional during initial seedling de-etiolation. By contrast, ELF4 is necessary for light-induced expression of both CCA1 and LHY, and conversely, CCA1 and LHY act negatively on light-induced ELF4 expression. Together with the observation that the temporal light-induced expression profile of ELF4 is counter-phased to that of CCA1 and LHY and parallels that of TOC1, these data are consistent with a previously unrecognized negative-feedback loop formed by CCA1/LHY and ELF4 in a manner analogous to the proposed CCA1/LHY/TOC1 oscillator. ELF3 is also necessary for light-induced CCA1/LHY expression, but it is neither light-induced nor clock-regulated during de-etiolation. Taken together, the data suggest (a) that ELF3, ELF4, and TOC1 all function in the primary, phytochrome-mediated light-input pathway to the circadian oscillator in Arabidopsis; and (b) that this oscillator consists of two or more interlocking transcriptional feedback loops that may be differentially operative during initial light induction and under steady-state circadian conditions in entrained green plants.

Distinct Roles of GIGANTEA in Promoting Flowering and Regulating Circadian Rhythms in Arabidopsis

The circadian clock acts as the timekeeping mechanism in photoperiodism. In Arabidopsis thaliana, a circadian clock-controlled flowering pathway comprising the genes GIGANTEA (GI), CONSTANS (CO), and FLOWERING LOCUS T (FT) promotes flowering specifically under long days. Within this pathway, GI regulates circadian rhythms and flowering and acts earlier in the hierarchy than CO and FT, suggesting that GI might regulate flowering indirectly by affecting the control of circadian rhythms. We studied the relationship between the roles of GI in flowering and the circadian clock using late elongated hypocotyl circadian clock associated1 double mutants, which are impaired in circadian clock function, plants overexpressing GI (35S:GI), and gi mutants. These experiments demonstrated that GI acts between the circadian oscillator and CO to promote flowering by increasing CO and FT mRNA abundance. In addition, circadian rhythms in expression of genes that do not control flowering are altered in 35S:GI and gi mutant plants under continuous light and continuous darkness, and the phase of expression of these genes is changed under diurnal cycles. Therefore, GI plays a general role in controlling circadian rhythms, and this is different from its effect on the amplitude of expression of CO and FT. Functional GI:green fluorescent protein is localized to the nucleus in transgenic Arabidopsis plants, supporting the idea that GI regulates flowering in the nucleus. We propose that the effect of GI on flowering is not an indirect effect of its role in circadian clock regulation, but rather that GI also acts in the nucleus to more directly promote the expression of flowering-time genes.

Positive and Negative Factors Confer Phase-Specific Circadian Regulation of Transcription in Arabidopsis

The circadian clock exerts a major influence on transcriptional regulation in plants and other organisms. We have previously identified a motif called the evening element (EE) that is overrepresented in the promoters of evening-phased genes. Here, we demonstrate that multimerized EEs are necessary and sufficient to confer evening-phased circadian regulation. Although flanking sequences are not required for EE function, they can modulate EE activity. One flanking sequence, taken from the PSEUDORESPONSE REGULATOR 9 promoter, itself confers dawn-phased rhythms and has allowed us to define a new clock promoter motif (the morning element [ME]). Scanning mutagenesis reveals that both activators and repressors of gene expression act through the ME and EE. Although our experiments confirm that CIRCADIAN CLOCK ASSOCIATED 1 (CCA1) and LATE ELONGATED HYPOCOTYL (LHY) are likely to act as repressors via the EE, they also show that they have an unexpected positive effect on EE-mediated gene expression as well. We have identified a clock-regulated activity in plant extracts that binds specifically to the EE and has a phase consistent with it being an activator of expression through the EE. This activity is reduced in CCA1/LHY null plants, suggesting it may itself be part of a circadian feedback loop and perhaps explaining the reduction in EE activity in these double mutant plants.

PSEUDO-RESPONSE REGULATORS, PRR9, PRR7 and PRR5, Together Play Essential Roles Close to the Circadian Clock of Arabidopsis thaliana

In Arabidopsis thaliana, a number of clock-associated protein components have been identified. Among them, CCA1 (CIRCADIAN CLOCK-ASSOCIATED 1)/LHY (LATE ELONGATED HYPOCOTYL) and TOC1 (TIMING OF CAB EXPRESSION 1) are believed to be the essential components of the central oscillator. CCA1 and LHY are homologous and partially redundant Myb-related DNA-binding proteins, whereas TOC1 is a member of a small family of proteins, designated as PSEUDO-RESPONSE REGULATOR. It is also believed that these two different types of clock components form an autoregulatory positive/negative feedback loop at the levels of transcription/translation that generates intrinsic rhythms. Nonetheless, it was not yet certain whether or not other PRR family members (PRR9, PRR7, PRR5 and PRR3) are implicated in clock function per se. Employing a set of prr9, prr7 and prr5 mutant alleles, here we established all possible single, double and triple prr mutants. They were examined extensively by comparing them with each other with regard to their phenotypes of circadian rhythms, photoperiodicity-dependent control of flowering time and photomorphogenic responses to red light during de-etiolation. Notably, the prr9 prr7 prr5 triple lesions in plants resulted in severe phenotypes: (i) arrhythmia in the continuous light conditions, and an anomalous phasing of diurnal oscillation of certain circadian-controlled genes even in the entrained light/dark cycle conditions; (ii) late flowering that was no longer sensitive to the photoperiodicity; and (iii) hyposensitivity (or blind) to red light in the photomorphogenic responses. The phenotypes of the single and double mutants were also characterized extensively, showing that they exhibited circadian-associated phenotypes characteristic for each. These results are discussed from the viewpoint that PRR9/PRR7/PRR5 together act as period-controlling factors, and they play overlapping and distinctive roles close to (or within) the central oscillator in which the relative, PRR1/TOC1, plays an essential role.

The Arabidopsis Pseudo-response Regulators, PRR5 and PRR7, Coordinately Play Essential Roles for Circadian Clock Function

In Arabidopsis thaliana, a number of clock-associated protein factors have been identified. Among them, TOC1 (TIMING OF CAB EXPRESSION 1) is believed to be a component of the central oscillator. TOC1 is a member of a small family of proteins, designated as ARABIDOPSIS PSEUDO-RESPONSE REGULATOR, including PRR1/TOC1, PRR3, PRR5, PRR7 and PRR9. It has not been certain whether or not other PRR family members are also implicated in clock function per se. To clarify this problem, here we constructed a double mutant line, which is assumed to have severe lesions in both the PRR5 and PRR7 genes. Resulting homozygous prr5-11 prr7-11 young seedlings showed a marked phenotype of hyposensitivity to red light during de-etiolation. In addition, they displayed a phenotype of extremely late flowering under long-day photoperiod conditions, but not short-day conditions. The rhythms at the level of transcription of certain clock-controlled genes were severely perturbed in the double mutant plants when they were released into continuous light (LL) and darkness (DD). The observed phenotype was best interpreted as 'arrhythmic in both LL and DD' and/or 'very short period with markedly reduced amplitude'. Even under the light entrainment (LD) conditions, the mutant plants showed anomalous diurnal oscillation profiles with altered amplitude and/or phase with regard to certain clock-controlled genes, including the clock component CCA1 (CIRCADIAN CLOCK-ASSOCIATED 1) gene. Such events were observed even under temperature entrainment conditions, suggesting that the prr5-11 prr7-11 lesions cannot simply be attributed to a defect in the light signal input pathway. These pleiotropic circadian-associated phenotypes of the double mutant were very remarkable, as compared with those observed previously for each single mutant. Taking these results together, we propose for the first time that PRR5 and PRR7 coordinately (or synergistically) play essential clock-associated roles close to the central oscillator.

Conservation and divergence of circadian clock operation in a stress-inducible Crassulacean acid metabolism species reveals clock compensation against stress.

One of the best-characterized physiological rhythms in plants is the circadian rhythm of CO(2) metabolism in Crassulacean acid metabolism (CAM) plants, which is the focus here. The central components of the plant circadian clock have been studied in detail only in Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana). Full-length cDNAs have been obtained encoding orthologs of CIRCADIAN CLOCK-ASSOCIATED1 (CCA1)/LATE ELONGATED HYPOCOTYL (LHY), TIMING OF CAB EXPRESSION1 (TOC1), EARLY FLOWERING4 (ELF4), ZEITLUPE (ZTL), FLAVIN-BINDING KELCH REPEAT F-BOX1 (FKF1), EARLY FLOWERING3 (ELF3), and a partial cDNA encoding GIGANTEA in the model stress-inducible CAM plant, Mesembryanthemum crystallinum (Common Ice Plant). TOC1 and LHY/CCA1 are under reciprocal circadian control in a manner similar to their regulation in Arabidopsis. ELF4, FKF1, ZTL, GIGANTEA, and ELF3 are under circadian control in C(3) and CAM leaves. ELF4 transcripts peak in the evening and are unaffected by CAM induction. FKF1 shows an abrupt transcript peak 3 h before subjective dusk. ELF3 transcripts appear in the evening, consistent with their role in gating light input to the circadian clock. Intriguingly, ZTL transcripts do not oscillate in Arabidopsis, but do in M. crystallinum. The transcript abundance of the clock-associated genes in M. crystallinum is largely unaffected by development and salt stress, revealing compensation of the central circadian clock against development and abiotic stress in addition to the well-known temperature compensation. Importantly, the clock in M. crystallinum is very similar to that in Arabidopsis, indicating that such a clock could control CAM without requiring additional components of the central oscillator or a novel CAM oscillator.

Extension of a genetic network model by iterative experimentation and mathematical analysis

Circadian clocks involve feedback loops that generate rhythmic expression of key genes. Molecular genetic studies in the higher plant Arabidopsis thaliana have revealed a complex clock network. The first part of the network to be identified, a transcriptional feedback loop comprising TIMING OF CAB EXPRESSION 1 (TOC1), LATE ELONGATED HYPOCOTYL (LHY) and CIRCADIAN CLOCK ASSOCIATED 1 (CCA1), fails to account for significant experimental data. We develop an extended model that is based upon a wider range of data and accurately predicts additional experimental results. The model comprises interlocking feedback loops comparable to those identified experimentally in other circadian systems. We propose that each loop receives input signals from light, and that each loop includes a hypothetical component that had not been explicitly identified. Analysis of the model predicted the properties of these components, including an acute light induction at dawn that is rapidly repressed by LHY and CCA1. We found this unexpected regulation in RNA levels of the evening-expressed gene GIGANTEA (GI), supporting our proposed network and making GI a strong candidate for this component.

PRR5 (PSEUDO-RESPONSE REGULATOR 5) Plays Antagonistic Roles to CCA1 (CIRCADIAN CLOCK-ASSOCIATED 1) in Arabidopsis thaliana

In general, the clock (or oscillator) is central to circadian rhythms in many organisms. In the model higher plant Arabidopsis thaliana, the best candidates for clock components are CCA1 (CIRCADIAN CLOCK-ASSOCIATED 1) and LHY (LATE ELONGATED HYPOCOTYL), which are homologous Myb-related transcription factors. It is also believed that TOC1 (TIMING OF CAB EXPRESSION 1) is another component of the central oscillator. In this connection, we have been characterizing a small family of proteins, designated ARABIDOPSIS PSEUDO-RESPONSE REGULATOR (PRR1, PRR3, PRR5, PRR7, and PRR9), based on the fact that one of the members (PRR1) is identical to TOC1. Nevertheless, it is not yet certain whether other PRR family members are also implicated in clock function per se. To address this issue, in this study we examined a functional interaction between the CCA1 clock component and one of the PRR family members, PRR5, by employing transgenic lines overexpressing both the CCA1 and PRR5 genes. Evidence will be provided that PRR5 plays an antagonistic role(s) to the putative CCA1 clock component.

Overlapping and Distinct Roles of PRR7 and PRR9 in the Arabidopsis Circadian Clock

The core mechanism of the circadian oscillators described to date rely on transcriptional negative feedback loops with a delay between the negative and the positive components . In plants, the first suggested regulatory loop involves the transcription factors CIRCADIAN CLOCK-ASSOCIATED 1 (CCA1) and LATE ELONGATED HYPOCOTYL (LHY) and the pseudo-response regulator TIMING OF CAB EXPRESSION 1 (TOC1/PRR1). TOC1 is a member of the Arabidopsis circadian-regulated PRR gene family . Analysis of single and double mutants in PRR7 and PRR9 indicates that these morning-expressed genes play a dual role in the circadian clock, being involved in the transmission of light signals to the clock and in the regulation of the central oscillator. Furthermore, CCA1 and LHY had a positive effect on PRR7 and PRR9 expression levels, indicating that they might form part of an additional regulatory feedback loop. We propose that the Arabidopsis circadian oscillator is composed of several interlocking positive and negative feedback loops, a feature of clock regulation that appears broadly conserved between plants, fungi, and animals.

Circadian Rhythms of Ethylene Emission in Arabidopsis

Ethylene controls multiple physiological processes in plants, including cell elongation. Consequently, ethylene synthesis is regulated by internal and external signals. We show that a light-entrained circadian clock regulates ethylene release from unstressed, wild-type Arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) seedlings, with a peak in the mid-subjective day. The circadian clock drives the expression of multiple ACC SYNTHASE genes, resulting in peak RNA levels at the phase of maximal ethylene synthesis. Ethylene production levels are tightly correlated with ACC SYNTHASE 8 steady-state transcript levels. The expression of this gene is controlled by light, by the circadian clock, and by negative feedback regulation through ethylene signaling. In addition, ethylene production is controlled by the TIMING OF CAB EXPRESSION 1 and CIRCADIAN CLOCK ASSOCIATED 1 genes, which are critical for all circadian rhythms yet tested in Arabidopsis. Mutation of ethylene signaling pathways did not alter the phase or period of circadian rhythms. Mutants with altered ethylene production or signaling also retained normal rhythmicity of leaf movement. We conclude that circadian rhythms of ethylene production are not critical for rhythmic growth.

CK2 phosphorylation of CCA1 is necessary for its circadian oscillator function in Arabidopsis.

The circadian clock controls numerous physiological and molecular processes in organisms ranging from fungi to human. In plants, these processes include leaf movement, stomata opening, and expression of a large number of genes. At the core of the circadian clock, the central oscillator consists of a negative autoregulatory feedback loop that is coordinated with the daily environmental changes, and that generates the circadian rhythms of the overt processes. Phosphorylation of some of the central oscillator proteins is necessary for the generation of normal circadian rhythms of Drosophila, humans, and Neurospora, where CK1 and CK2 are emerging as the main protein kinases involved in the phosphorylation of PER and FRQ. We have previously shown that in Arabidopsis, the protein kinase CK2 can phosphorylate the clock-associated protein CIRCADIAN CLOCK ASSOCIATED 1 (CCA1) in vitro. The overexpression of one of its regulatory subunits, CKB3, affects the regulation of circadian rhythms. Whether the effects of CK2 on the clock were due to its phosphorylation of a clock component had yet to be proven. By examining the effects of constitutively expressing a mutant form of the Arabidopsis clock protein CCA1 that cannot be phosphorylated by CK2, we demonstrate here that CCA1 phosphorylation by CK2 is important for the normal functioning of the central oscillator.

Characterization of plant circadian rhythms by employing Arabidopsis cultured cells with bioluminescence reporters.

Recent intensive studies have begun to shed light on the molecular mechanisms underlying the plant circadian clock in Arabidopsis thaliana. During the course of these previous studies, the most powerful technique, elegantly adopted, was a real-time bioluminescence monitoring system of circadian rhythms in intact plants carrying a luciferase (LUC) fusion transgene. We previously demonstrated that Arabidopsis cultured cells also retain an ability to generate circadian rhythms, at least partly. To further improve the cultured cell system for studies on circadian rhythms, here we adopted a bioluminescence monitoring system by establishing the cell lines carrying appropriate reporter genes, namely, CCA1::LUC and APRR1::LUC, with which CCA1 (CIRCADIAN CLOCK-ASSOCIATED1) and APRR1 (or TOC1) (ARABIDOPSIS PSEUDO-RESPONSE REGULATORS1 or TIMING OF CAB EXPRESSION1) are believed to be the components of the central oscillator. We report the results that consistently supported the view that the established cell lines, equipped with such bioluminescence reporters, might provide us with an advantageous means to characterize the plant circadian clock.

Antisense suppression of the Arabidopsis PIF3 gene does not affect circadian rhythms but causes early flowering and increases FT expression

Photoperiodic control of flowering is regulated by light and a circadian clock. Feedback regulation of the transcription of clock components is one of the most common and important mechanisms that control clock functions in animals, fungi, and plants. The Arabidopsis circadian clock is believed to involve two myb-related proteins, LHY (late elongated hypocotyl) and CCA1 (circadian clock associated 1), which negatively regulate TOC1 ( timing of cab expression 1) gene expression through direct binding to the TOC1 promoter. PIF3 (phytochrome-interacting factor 3), a bHLH transcription factor binds promoter regions of the LHY and CCA1 genes, affecting the light induction of these genes, and interacts with TOC1 protein. Although the positive feedback regulation of clock components in plants has been predicted, and PIF3 has been assumed to be involved, the molecular nature of this process has not been elucidated. Here we demonstrate that the antisense suppression of the PIF3 gene causes higher levels of mRNA of floral activator genes CO ( constans) and FT ( flowering locus T) and results in early flowering under long days (LD). Neither the circadian rhythms of the clock-controlled genes (CCGs) under constant conditions nor the diurnal rhythms of the CCGs under LD conditions are affected by the reduction in PIF3 gene expression. These results suggest that PIF3 may play an important role in the control of flowering through clock-independent regulation of CO and FT gene expression in Arabidopsis.

EARLY FLOWERING 4 functions in phytochrome B-regulated seedling de-etiolation.

To define the functions of genes previously identified by expression profiling as being rapidly light induced under phytochrome (phy) control, we are investigating the seedling de-etiolation phenotypes of mutants carrying T-DNA insertional disruptions at these loci. Mutants at one such locus displayed reduced responsiveness to continuous red, but not continuous far-red light, suggesting a role in phyB signaling but not phyA signaling. Consistent with such a role, expression of this gene is induced by continuous red light in wild-type seedlings, but the level of induction is strongly reduced in phyB-null mutants. The locus encodes a novel protein that we show localizes to the nucleus, thus suggesting a function in light-regulated gene expression. Recently, this locus was identified as EARLY FLOWERING 4, a gene implicated in floral induction and regulating the expression of the gene CIRCADIAN CLOCK-ASSOCIATED 1. Together with these previous data, our findings suggest that EARLY FLOWERING 4 functions as a signaling intermediate in phy-regulated gene expression involved in promotion of seedling de-etiolation, circadian clock function, and photoperiod perception.

Arabidopsis PSEUDO-RESPONSE REGULATOR7 is a signaling intermediate in phytochrome-regulated seedling deetiolation and phasing of the circadian clock.

To identify new components in the phytochrome (phy) signaling network in Arabidopsis, we used a sensitized genetic screen for deetiolation-defective seedlings. Two allelic mutants were isolated that exhibited reduced sensitivity to both continuous red and far-red light, suggesting involvement in both phyA and phyB signaling. The molecular lesions responsible for the phenotype were shown to be mutations in the Arabidopsis PSEUDO-RESPONSE REGULATOR7 (PRR7) gene. PRR7 is a member of a small gene family in Arabidopsis previously suggested to be involved in circadian rhythms. A PRR7-beta-glucuronidase fusion protein localized to the nucleus, implying a possible function in the regulation of photoresponsive gene expression. Consistent with this suggestion, prr7 seedlings were partially defective in the regulation of the rapidly light-induced genes CIRCADIAN CLOCK ASSOCIATED1 (CCA1) and LATE ELONGATED HYPOCOTYL (LHY), observable as a premature increase in expression level during the second peak of the biphasic induction profile that is elicited upon initial exposure of dark-grown seedlings to light. A similar 3- to 6-h coordinated advance in peak free-running expression of CCA1, LHY, and TIMING-OF-CAB1, which are considered to encode the molecular components of the circadian oscillator in Arabidopsis, was observed in entrained fully green prr7 seedlings compared with wild-type seedlings. Collectively, these data suggest that PRR7 functions as a signaling intermediate in the phytochrome-regulated gene expression responsible for both seedling deetiolation and phasing of the circadian clock in response to light.