Cincinnati Knee Rating System Research Articles

Patients' joint perception after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction as a reliable patient-reported outcome measure.

This study aims to evaluate and compare patients' joint perception (PJP) with other commonly employed patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) in a cohort of patients following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). A retrospective study was conducted on 108 patients who underwent ACLR between 2017 and 2021, with complete data available for visual analogue scale (VAS) pain, PJP, Forgotten Joint Score (FJS), Tegner Activity Scale, Lysholm Knee Scoring Scale, Anterior Cruciate Ligament Return to Sport After Injury (ACL-RSI), Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE), Cincinnati Knee Rating System (CKRS)and The Hospital for Special Surgery Anterior Cruciate Ligament Satisfaction Survey (HSS ACL-SS) at a mean follow-up of 3 years. Spearman's rank-order correlation was used to determine the correlations between clinical scores. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was used to assess the discriminatory power of the chosen PROMs in detecting natural joint perception. Natural joint perception was defined as patients responding 'like a native or natural joint' or PJP = 1. This study hypothesized that PJP would demonstrate significant correlations with established PROMs, indicating its reliability and validity as a tool for assessing outcomes following ACLR. PJP showed significant correlations with all the reported PROMs, suggesting its potential as a valid and reliable assessment tool for evaluating ACLR outcomes. The ROC curve analysis indicated a good area under the curve for identifying natural joint perception using various PROMs. According to the PJP, nearly 20% of patients reported natural joint perception. This study evaluates PJP as a reliable tool for assessing patient outcomes following ACLR. Its significant correlation with other established PROMs underscores its potential as a valuable addition to the existing array of PROMs in ACLR. Level III.

Optimization of Collagen Scaffold with Cultured Autologous Chondrocytes for Osteochondritis Dissecans of the Knee: A Case Report

The treatment of osteochondritis dissecans of the knee has always been a challenge for orthopedic surgeons. We present a case report of a 38-year-old male with severe right knee pain after suffering from an indirect trauma and axial rotation of the knee, limiting knee functionality and impeding his ability to walk, with a diagnosis of osteochondritis dissecans in the trochlea of the knee, who underwent arthroscopic treatment with matrix-induced autologous chondrocyte implantation (MACI). After the surgery, a physical therapy protocol for MACI was implemented, and magnetic resonance images with cartilage mapping were used to evaluate the recovery of the lesion. A total recovery was observed and evaluated with the modified Cincinnati knee rating system (mCKRS). A discussion is provided with evidence and general recommendations for the use of MACI in the treatment of adult OCD of the knee as a possible alternative to conventional treatments. Our case shows a rapid improvement in pain and functionality 2 months after surgery that progressed to full recovery within 6 months.

Autologous bone grafting in combination with autologous chondrocyte implantation yields favourable outcomes in the treatment of osteochondral defects of the knee: A systematic literature review.

This study addresses the gap in the current literature by evaluating the combined treatment of autologous bone grafting and autologous chondrocyte implantation (ABCI) for osteochondral defects of the knee. It aims to evaluate clinical outcomes against methodological quality and to summarize histological results and surgical techniques. A thorough search was conducted across Pubmed, Cochrane and Embase databases. Studies reporting clinical outcomes of ABCI for osteochondral defects of the knee were included. Patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), failure rates, methodological quality and potential conflicts of interest were evaluated. Histological results and surgical techniques were summarized. Eighteen studies with 344 analyzed patients met the eligibility criteria for inclusion. All studies showed a significant improvement (p < 0.05) across different PROMs (subjective International Knee Documentation Committee score, Cincinnati Knee Rating System, Visual Analogue Scale, Lysholm Score, Tegner Activity Scale, Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score and Knee Society Score) compared to the preoperative status. Failure rates ranged from 0% to 17.6%, with a mean follow-up of 73.2 months (range: 9.0-143.6 months). Methodological quality was low to medium, including only one comparative study. Six studies reviewed reported a potential conflict of interest. The histological assessment showed effective bonding between autologous chondrocytesand bone graft. A large degree of variability was observed in the operative technique used. The current literature suggests that ABCI yields good clinical outcomes at mid- to long-term follow-up with favourable histological results for osteochondral defects of the knee. However, future research should focus on high-quality comparative studies to better guide treatment choices. Introducing ABCI as the standard abbreviation may enhance clarity in future research. Level IV.

Anterior cruciate ligament-Return to sport after injury scale brief version after ACL reconstruction: Persian translation, cross-cultural adaptation and validation.

The purpose of this study is to analyze the short anterior cruciate ligament return to sport after injury (ACL-RSI) (Persian) version's cultural adaption and validity. To assess test-retest reliability, 102 participants were filled out the short ACL-RSI(Per) scale 6 months or more after ACLR surgery. Internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha), test-retest reliability (intraclass correlation coefficients), construct validity (Pearson's r) and sensitivity (floor/ceiling effect) were determined. In addition, patient completed other relevant measures such as Lysholm scores, the hospital for special surgery ACL satisfaction survey (HSS ACL-SS), the visual analogue scale (VAS) of pain and patient's satisfaction, the Tegner activity score (TAS), the single assessment numeric evaluation (SANE) and the Cincinnati Knee Rating System (CKRS). The short ACL-RSI(Per) scale showed high internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.91) and test-retest reliability (ICC = 0.923). Significant correlations between short ACL-RSI(Per) and other scales supported validity. There was a statistically significant connection between the short ACL-RSI(Per) and the following outcomes: HSS ACL-SS (r = 0.698, p < 0.001), VAS pain (r = 0.356, p < 0.001), CKRS (r = 0.644, p < 0.001), TAS (r = 0414, p < 0.001), Lysholm score (r = 0.467, p < 0.001) and SANE score (r = 0.536; p < 0.001). In addition to a satisfactory ceiling impact (15%), a sizeable floor effect (16.7%) was also seen. The short ACL-RSI(Per) scale is a reliable and valid tool for assessing psychological readiness for return to sport after ACL reconstruction in Persian. III.

Return to Sports in Patients Aged 50 Years or Younger After Robotic-Assisted Patellofemoral Arthroplasty: A 10-Year Experience Reporting High Clinical Benefits and High Patient Satisfaction With Return to an Active Lifestyle

Background: Limited data are available on return to sports and patient psychometric ratings of success after patellofemoral arthroplasty (PFA) in younger patients with high expectations to return to an active lifestyle. Purpose/Hypothesis: The purpose of this article was to determine the role of PFA and its success in meeting patient expectations regarding the return to low-impact recreational sports and an active lifestyle in younger, active patients. It was hypothesized that PFA would allow younger patients to return to low-impact sports and an active lifestyle and achieve high patient psychometric ratings. Study Design: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: In this 10-year prospective study (2009-2018), robotic-assisted PFA was performed on 44 patients (32 women and 12 men; n = 51 consecutive knees), with a mean age of 37.2 years (range, 21-50 years). The follow-up rate was 98%, with a mean of 5.3 years (range, 2-9.3 years). Primary clinical outcomes were as follows: the validated Cincinnati Knee Rating System sports activity and symptom rating scales, patient psychometric ratings of the substantial clinical benefit (SCB), and the Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS). Secondary outcomes were the Cincinnati Knee Rating System occupational rating, visual analog pain scale, and the 12-Item Short Form Health Survey. Survivorship was defined by conversion to total knee replacement (TKR). Results: Before PFA, 78% of patients (35/45 knees) were symptomatic and unable to perform recreational sports, with only 20% of patients (9/45 knees) performing some low-impact sports. After PFA, 80% of patients (36/45 knees) were able to perform low-impact sports, and 7% (3/45 knees) performed jumping-pivoting sports (P < .001). The SCB scored by the patient showed 87% of knees as good, very good, or normal. On the PASS analysis, 89% of patients (95% CI, 76%-96%) were “pleased,” and 93% (95% CI, 82%-99%) would undergo surgery again. There were clinically relevant improvements in symptoms of pain, swelling, and giving way (P = .0001). Preoperatively, 91% of knees had moderate to severe pain with activities of daily living, and only 11% of knees had pain at the follow-up. Five of the 50 knees (10%) underwent TKR conversion with one patient lost to follow-up. Conclusion: PFA resulted in a high return of patients to low-impact sports with high SCB and PASS psychometric ratings. The robotic-assisted 3-dimensional preoperative planning allowed precise intraoperative trochlear implant alignment in knees with severe trochlear dysplasia. PFA is recommended as an alternative treatment in younger patients with end-stage symptomatic patellofemoral arthritis. Registration: NCT02738476 (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier).

Rapid Recovery after Reparation of Full-Thickness Chondral Defects of the Knee with the Use of Hyaluronan (HA)-Based 3-D Scaffold.

Articular cartilage injuries are found in up to 60% of patients who undergo an arthroscopic knee procedure, and those that totally affect articular cartilage (grade IV) have limited regenerative capacity and extended time for recovery. 3-D scaffolds represent a novel solution to address this type of injury. Our purpose was to analyze the MRI findings and functional status of patients that underwent repair of chondral defects either by microfractures or Hyaluronan (HA) 3-D scaffolding. We conducted a retrospective study of patients with chondral defects. The outcomes analyzed in this study included anatomical changes evaluated by the Henderson score (based on MRI findings) at baseline, 6, and 12 months after surgery, and improvement in functionality evaluated by the Modified Cincinnati Knee Rating System (MCKRS) at baseline and 6 months after surgery. Clinical and demographic characteristics were similar for both groups. There was a statistically significant improvement in Henderson score for the 3-D scaffold-treated group at 6 months versus the microfracture group (p < 0.0001). Improvement in functionality, measured by the MCKRS, was more frequently found in the 3-D scaffold-treated group. In conclusion, the use of HA 3-D scaffolding was superior, with faster recovery evident 6 months after the surgery that progressed to full recovery in all patients a year after surgery. Future studies with a randomized design might help to support our findings. This study provides level III evidence.

BONE MARROW-DERIVED STEM CELL TRANSPLANTATION FOR OSTEOCHONDRAL DEFECTS OF THE KNEE: A PROSPECTIVE CLINICAL STUDY

AbstractBackgroundAutologous chondrocyte implantation is a NICE approved intervention however it involves the morbidity of two operations, a prolonged rehabilitation and substantial healthcare costs. This study describes a novel, one-step, bone marrow (BM) derived mesenchymal stem cell (MSC) transplantation technique for treating knee osteochondral lesions and presents our prospective clinical study investigating the success of this technique in 206 lesions over a 5 year period.MethodologyThe surgical technique involves harvesting BM from patients’ anterior superior iliac spines, centrifugation to isolate MSCs and seeding into a type 1 collagen scaffold (SyngenitTM Biomatrix). Autologous fibrin glue is used to secure the scaffold into the defect. Inclusion criteria included patients aged 15 – 55 years old with symptomatic osteochondral lesions &gt;1cm2. Exclusion criteria included patients with ligament instability, uncorrected alignment, inflammatory arthropathy and a Body Mass Index &gt;35 kg/m2. Outcome measures included the Modified Cincinnati Knee Rating System (MCKRS), complications and reoperations.ResultsMean MCKR scores showed statistically significant improvements compared to pre-operative scores at 6 months 58.79 ± 3.5 and 1 year postoperatively 63.82 ± 3.93 with further improvements at 2 years and 5 years which did not reach statistical significance. Survival rates were 97.9%, 94% and 93.2% at 1, 2 and 5 years. Multiple regression analysis identified previous cartilage surgery, microfracture and age as factors affecting MCKRS scores (p &lt; 0.029, 0.001 and 0.030, respectively).ConclusionsOne-step BM derived stem cell transplantation demonstrates satisfactory outcomes over a 5 year period.

Clinical, Biomechanical, and Self-reported Health Status After ACL Reconstruction With Meniscal Repair in Soccer Players: Results at Minimum 1-Year Follow-up.

Performing meniscal repair with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) has been shown to contribute to the long-term preservation of knee health and gait biomechanics. To evaluate the role of meniscal repair in the performance of semiprofessional soccer players who returned to sport after ACLR. Case series; Level of evidence, 4. This study included 51 male soccer players (mean ± SD age, 28.82 ± 5.33 years) who underwent ACLR at a single institution between July 2018 and July 2019. The players were divided into 3 groups according to surgery type: ACLR only (n = 30), ACLR with lateral meniscal repair (n = 9), and ACLR with medial meniscal repair (n = 12). Outcomes were evaluated through clinical examination, self-reported health questionnaires (Cincinnati Knee Rating System, Tegner activity score, Tegner Lysholm Knee Scoring Scale, Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia, and ACL-Return to Sport After Injury), and biomechanical performance evaluations (balance, strength, coordination, and symmetry tests). Parametric and nonparametric tests were carried out for multiple comparisons. The mean ± SD follow-up time was 20.75 ± 9.38 months. Although no significant differences emerged in clinical and self-reported health status, almost all the physical parameters tested resulted in lower performance in players treated with ACLR and meniscal repair. Moreover, patients with ACLR with lateral meniscal repair reported higher pain and fear of reinjury, with lower outcomes in terms of strength, symmetry, and coordination as compared with the other 2 groups. Balance abilities were significantly affected in players who underwent meniscal repair as compared with those who underwent ACLR only. The findings showed that biomechanical performance measures and fear of reinjury were significantly worse in soccer players with associated meniscal repair at a minimum 1-year follow-up, especially in those with a lateral meniscal tear.

A Randomized Trial of Autologous Chondrocyte Implantation Versus Alternative Forms of Surgical Cartilage Management in Patients With a Failed Primary Treatment for Chondral or Osteochondral Defects in the Knee

Background: There are limited randomized controlled trials with long-term outcomes comparing autologous chondrocyte implantation (ACI) versus alternative forms of surgical cartilage management within the knee. Purpose: To determine at 5 years after surgery whether ACI was superior to alternative forms of cartilage management in patients after a failed previous treatment for chondral or osteochondral defects in the knee. Study Design: Randomized controlled trial; Level of evidence, 1. Methods: In total, 390 participants were randomly assigned to receive either ACI or alternative management. Patients aged 18 to 55 years with one or two symptomatic cartilage defects who had failed 1 previous therapeutic surgical procedure in excess of 6 months prior were included. Dual primary outcome measures were used: (1) patient-completed Lysholm knee score and (2) time from surgery to cessation of treatment benefit. Secondary outcome measures included International Knee Documentation Committee and Cincinnati Knee Rating System scores, as well as number of serious adverse events. Analysis was performed on an intention-to-treat basis. Results: Lysholm scores were improved by 1 year in both groups (15.4 points [95% CI, 11.9 to 18.8] and 15.2 points [95% CI, 11.6 to 18.9]) for ACI and alternative, with this improvement sustained over the duration of the trial. However, no evidence of a difference was found between the groups at 5 years (2.9 points; 95% CI, −1.8 to 7.5; P = .46). Approximately half of the participants (55%; 95% CI, 47% to 64% with ACI) were still experiencing benefit at 5 years, with time to cessation of treatment benefit similar in both groups (hazard ratio, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.72 to 1.32; P > .99). There was a differential effect on Lysholm scores in patients without previous marrow stimulation compared with those with marrow stimulation (P = .03; 6.4 points in favor of ACI; 95% CI, −0.4 to 13.1). More participants experienced a serious adverse event with ACI (P = .02). Conclusion: Over 5 years, there was no evidence of a difference in Lysholm scores between ACI and alternative management in patients who had previously failed treatment. Previous marrow stimulation had a detrimental effect on the outcome of ACI. Registration: International Standard Randomised Controlled Trial Number: 48911177

Mesure des résultats psychologiques rapportés par le patient après reconstruction du ligament croisé antérieur : évaluation de la sous-catégorie de l’échelle ACL-Return to Sport after Injury (ACL-RSI)

BackgroundIt has been recognized that psychological factors influence the return to sports after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). The ACL-return to sports after injury (RSI) scale was developed based on subcategories of emotions, confidence in physical performance and risk appraisal. However, it has not been clarified describing which is the most influential psychological factor of the ACL-RSI scale. HypothesisRisk appraisal is the most influent for return to sports in the subcategories of the ACL-RSI scale. Patients and MethodsA total of 85 competitive patients who had undergone ACLR were evaluated at 6, 12 and 24months after surgery. They were classified the return to sports (RTS) group and non-return to sports (NRTS) group. Evaluations were several clinical and functional scores including Cincinnati knee rating system, Knee Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), Lysholm score, limitation in activities of daily living (ADL) and sports which estimated by Visual Analog Scale (VAS) score, Isokinetic Muscle Strength (quadriceps and hamstrings), single hop test and anterior laxity. They were investigated on their relationship with the ACL-RSI scale including each subcategory. ResultsThe total ACL-RSI scale significantly improved at each point. Of the subcategories, only risk appraisal was not significantly different at each point (p=0.21 and p=0.13). There was a significant difference at 24months after ACLR between the RTS group and NRTS group. In terms of risk appraisal, compared with emotion and performance confidence, the difference in the mean value was the most divergent (RTS group: 55.9±22.7 and NRTS group: 23.8±19.3) and took time to improve through 24months. Among various clinical and functional scores, there were significant differences in the VAS score for sports, KOOS-symptoms, sports and QOL, Cincinnati Knee Rating System-cut, and single hop test values between two groups. Of these, the KOOS-QOL and VAS score for sports showed particularly strong correlations with ACL-RSI risk appraisal (r=0.75 and –0.68, respectively). ConclusionOf the ACL-RSI scale, risk appraisal took the longest time to improve and strongly affected the return to sports. The KOOS-QOL and VAS score for sports were most strongly correlated with the ACL-RSI risk appraisal. It seems that it is important to reduce the psychological risk as soon as possible after ACL injury in ACLR patients. Level of evidenceII.

Is USG-guided aspiration more effective than physiotherapy in the treatment of Baker’s cyst?

Aim: Previous publications have described various therapeutic modalities for symptomatic cysts, including non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, cystostomy, physical therapy, and exercises. The objective of thise study was to elucidate the effectiveness of shrinking the cyst without steroidal injection and to compare aspiration with classic physiotherapy and exercises.&#x0D; Material and Method: This randomized, controlled trial involved 40 patients with Baker’s cyst. The participants were randomized into two groups, (I) an aspiration group (n=20) and (II) a control group (n=20). In the aspiration group, Baker’s cyst content was aspirated percutaneously under USG guidance, while no aspiration was performed in the control group. Pain was evaluated with a visual analog scale, while the Lysholm knee scoring scale and Cincinnati knee rating system were employed to determine functional status. Quality of life and disability were evaluated using the Nottingham Health Profile and the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index .&#x0D; Results: Differences were observed in USG measurements (width, length, and area) and clinical parameters before and after treatment in both groups. However, although these differences were greater in the aspiration group, they were not statistically significant.&#x0D; Conclusion: Our results indicate that cyst aspiration performed with USG provides no additional effect to those of physical exercises and cold application. Exercise therapy and cold application should be considered before proceeding with an invasive procedure.

A bone bruise at the lateral and medial tibial plateau with an anterior cruciate ligament injury is associated with a meniscus tear.

Bone bruises with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury are well studied, but the association between bone bruises and multiple factors is unclear. The main objective of this study was to investigate the association between bone bruising and ACL injury and concomitant injury as well as clinical and functional scores. The second objective was to investigate the presence and distribution patterns of bone bruises. A total of 176 patients who underwent ACL reconstruction for primary ACL injury were included. The demographic characteristics and responses to clinical and functional assessments (the Visual Analog Scale for activities of daily living and sports, the Cincinnati Knee Rating System, the Lysholm score, the Knee Osteoarthritis Outcome Score and side-to-side difference in anterior laxity) were recorded at the initial visit. Concomitant injuries were evaluated by intraoperative assessment. Bone bruises were detected in 141 patients (80.1%). The lateral femoral condyle (LFC) was the most common site in 116 patients (65.9%), followed by the lateral tibial plateau (LTP) in 82 patients (46.6%), medial tibial plateau (MTP) in 47 patients (26.7%) and medial femoral condyle (MFC) in 29 patients (16.5%). Regarding the distribution patterns, bone bruising at only the LFC, which was the most common pattern, was detected in 38 patients (27.0%). Bone bruising at the LTP or MTP was significantly associated with lateral (LM) and medial meniscus (MM) tears (odds ratios 4.0, 3.0, 4.3 and 40.5, 95% confidence intervals 1.5-11.6, 1.2-15.1, 1.2-17.3 and 8.6-283.0, respectively). No marked differences in the functional or clinical scores were noted. The severity of bone bruising at the MTP was significantly associated with MM tears and that at the LTP was significantly associated with LM tears. (p < 0.01). This study showed association between bone bruising at LTP and LM tears or at MTP and MM tears. Additionally, it provided detailed information on the presence and distribution patterns of bone bruises at each anatomic site. These findings are clinically relevant and will aid in preoperatively diagnosing meniscus tears in cases of ACL injury. Level III.

Different timing in allograft and autograft maturation after primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction does not influence the clinical outcome at mid-long-term follow-up.

PurposeThe use of allografts in primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) is increasing although they are still supposed to be associated to greater risk of re-rupture due to a slower and less efficient graft maturation. The aim of this prospective randomized controlled study was to compare the graft maturation after ACLR with allograft and autograft by MRI at 6- and 12-month follow-up and integrate these data with the functional and clinical results observed at 6-, 12- and 60-month follow-up.MethodsFifty patients with indication to primary ACLR were randomly and equally divided into hamstring autograft or allograft tendon groups. The graft maturation was measured at 6- and 12-month follow-up by the SNQ score and other radiological parameters on MRI scans. Clinical and functional recovery was evaluated by Lysholm score, Visual Analogues Scale, Tegner activity scale and modified Cincinnati knee rating system at 6, 12 and 60 months after surgery to estimate the predictive value of the radiological parameters for clinical outcomes. Return-to-sport (ACL-RSI) was measured 60 months after surgery.ResultsThree patients had retear of the neo-ligament (two from Auto group and one from Allo group). All the clinical/functional parameters significantly improved over time, with no statistically significant difference between the groups. At 6 months, the SNQ value was significantly higher in the Auto than in the Allo group (12.9 vs 7.9, p = 0.038), but at 12 months they were comparable (9.8 vs 10.4). The 6-month SNQ values did not correlate with the clinical scores, whereas the 12-month SNQ values significantly correlated with the Cincinnati score, Lysholm score and Tegner activity scale collected at 60-month follow-up.ConclusionNo clinical or functional differences have been found between the two treatment groups, supporting the suitability of using allograft in primary ACLR, when available. The results at MRI scans showed a different graft maturation trend in the two groups, with allografts being more reactive in the first 6 months. MRI together with the subjective evaluation allows to evaluate objectively the status of the neo-ligamentization process and therefore helps the surgeon to dictate the individual time for return-to-sport.Level of evidenceLevel I.Supplementary InformationThe online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00167-021-06785-4.

Psychological Patient-reported outcome measure after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: Evaluation of subcategory in ACL-Return to Sport after Injury (ACL-RSI) scale

BackgroundIt has been recognized that psychological factors influence the return to sports after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). The ACL-return to sports after injury (RSI) scale was developed based on subcategories of emotions, confidence in physical performance and risk appraisal. However, it has not been clarified describing which is the most influential psychological factor of the ACL-RSI scale. HypothesisRisk appraisal is the most influent for return to sports in the subcategories of the ACL-RSI scale. Patients and methodsA total of 85 competitive patients who had undergone ACLR were evaluated at 6, 12 and 24 months after surgery. They were classified the return to sports (RTS) group and non-return to sports (NRTS) group. Evaluations were several clinical and functional scores including Cincinnati knee rating system, Knee Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), Lysholm score, limitation in activities of daily living (ADL) and sports which estimated by Visual Analog Scale (VAS) score, Isokinetic Muscle Strength (quadriceps and hamstrings), single hop test and anterior laxity. They were investigated their relationship with the ACL-RSI scale including each subcategory. ResultsThe total ACL-RSI scale significantly improved at each point. Of the subcategories, only risk appraisal was not significantly different at each point (p=0.21 and p=0.13). There was a significant difference at 24 months after ACLR between the RTS group and NRTS group. In terms of risk appraisal, compared with emotion and performance confidence, the difference in the mean value was the most divergent (RTS group: 55.9±22.7 and NRTS group: 23.8±19.3) and took time to improve through 24 months. Among various clinical and functional scores, there were significant differences in the VAS score for sports, KOOS-symptoms, sports and QOL, Cincinnati Knee Rating System-cut, and single hop test values between two groups. Of these, the KOOS-QOL and VAS score for sports showed particularly strong correlations with ACL-RSI risk appraisal (r=0.75 and -0.68, respectively). ConclusionOf the ACL-RSI scale, risk appraisal took the longest time to improve and strongly affected the return to sports. The KOOS-QOL and VAS score for sports were most strongly correlated with the ACL-RSI risk appraisal. It seems that it is important to reduce the psychological risk as soon as possible after ACL injury in ACLR patients. Level of evidenceII.

High Rate of Overlapping Question Content Among Commonly Used Patient-Reported Outcome Measurements for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injury

PurposeTo precisely compare the questions and content between the most commonly cited knee-specific patient-reported outcome measurements (PROs) for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury.MethodsA literature review through Medline from November 1, 2018, to November 1, 2020, was performed to find the most cited knee-specific PROs for assessment of ACL injuries. Each question was then classified as 1) identical, similar, or unique; 2) pertaining to 1 of 6 domains (pain, symptoms, functional activities, occupational activities, sports/recreation, and quality of life). The PROs were then compared to each other to assess question overlap and domain coverage.ResultsA total of 133 questions were analyzed from the seven most common PROs: International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) form, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), Lysholm Knee Scoring Scale, Tegner Activity Scale, Marx Scale, Knee Outcome Survey (KOS), and Cincinnati Knee Rating System (CKRS). The total distribution of identical (31.6%), similar (31.6%), and unique (36.8%) questions was found to be relatively even. However, this distribution varied within each PRO. KOS and Lysholm had the highest percentages of identical questions (64% and 62.5%, respectively). KOOS had the highest number of unique questions (26/42, 61.9%), while Tegner held the highest percentage (11/16, 68.8%). Sports/recreation was the only domain assessed by all PROs.ConclusionNearly two-thirds of questions overlap between the commonly used PROs for ACL injury. Although sports/recreation is assessed by all PROs, each has its own pattern of coverage across this and other domains.Level of EvidenceIV, cross-sectional study.

Clinical and radiographic results after ACL reconstruction using an adjustable-loop device

BackgroundThe femoral cortical suspension device such as fixed loop devices (FLD) and adjustable-loop device (ALD) are used for ACLR technique in recent days. However, there was few studies of clinical and radiographic results for ACLR using ALD. This study was conducted to clarify the clinical and radiographic results, stability and bone tunnel enlargement after ACLR using a ToggleLoc with a zip loop as ALD. Methods80 patients who had data available from the most recent follow-up at ≥2 years since ACLR were evaluated both clinical and radiographic results. They were divided into single bundle reconstruction group (SBR) and double bundle reconstruction group (DBR). Clinical scores were included subjective scores and objective scores at pre- and postoperatively 2 years. The subjective scores were the Cincinnati knee rating system, Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), Lysholm score, Tegner activity score, Visual Analog Scale (VAS) and ACL-Return to Sport after Injury (RSI) scale. The objective scores were the isokinetic muscle strength, side-to-side difference in anterior instability and single hop test. In radiographical assessment, femoral and tibial tunnel enlargement was evaluated by three-dimensional computed tomography. ResultsIn both SBR and DBR group, the postoperative subjective scores were significantly improved compared to the preoperative values, except for the Tegner activity score. Similarly, the side-to-side differences in muscle strength, anterior instability and single hop test were significantly improved after surgery. The changes in the femoral and tibial tunnel maximum cross section areas of SBR were 104.3 % ± 21.2 % and 89.2 % ± 15.2 %, respectively, at 2 years post-operatively. In DBR, in the femoral bone volume change of the antero medial (AM) and postero lateral (PL) bundle were 107.0 ± 3.5 % and 108.1 ± 3.3, and in the tibial bone volume change of AM and PL bundle were 90.6 ± 3.3 % and 87.0 ± 4.2 %. At the femoral site, the rate of tunnel enlargement increased for the first 12 months and then decreased through 24 months postoperatively. At the tibial site, by contrast, the rate of tunnel enlargement decreased consistently over the two-year postoperative follow-up. ConclusionThis is the first study to include clinical data on ACLR using a ToggleLoc with a zip loop device. ACLR using these devices as ALDs resulted in good clinical outcomes and provided good stability of the knee with relatively little bone tunnel enlargement in both SBR and DBR group.

Prospective and Randomized Clinical Evaluation of Hamstring Versus Patellar Tendon Autograft for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction in Soccer Players.

Background:Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction is usually performed with autologous bone–patellar tendon–bone (PT) or hamstring tendon (HT) graft. There has been only 1 randomized clinical trial examining ACL reconstruction with these grafts specifically in soccer players, and more studies comparing these graft types within a homogenous cohort such as soccer athletes may better highlight differences in outcomes.Purpose:To compare the results of ACL reconstruction with PT versus HT autograft in soccer players and to evaluate objective and subjective outcomes.Study Design:Randomized controlled trial; Level of evidence, 1.Methods:A total of 62 professional or semiprofessional soccer players (mean age, 25.1 years) with ACL injury were randomized to undergo reconstruction with PT or HT autograft by a single orthopaedic surgeon (n = 31 in each group). Outcome measures were recorded preoperatively and at 2 years postoperatively. The primary outcome was the modified Cincinnati Knee Rating System, and secondary outcomes were the objective and subjective International Knee Documentation Committee scores, Lachman test, pivot-shift test, anterior drawer test, and Lysholm score. The following variables were also evaluated postoperatively: return to soccer, level at return, graft rerupture, postoperative complications, anterior knee pain, patellar tendinitis, difficulty sprinting, and loss of kicking power.Results:The PT and HT groups were homogenous in terms of age, sex distribution, injured side, and time from injury to surgery, and there was no difference between them on any preoperative outcome score. At 2 years postoperatively, there were no differences between the groups on any outcome score; however, there were significantly fewer patients with anterior knee pain in the HT group compared with the PT group (7 [22.6%] vs 15 [48.4%], respectively; P = .03). Two patients from each group (2/31; 6.5%) sustained rerupture.Conclusion:There were no differences between soccer players who underwent different types of ACL reconstruction with the exception of anterior knee pain, which was more frequent in players who underwent reconstruction with PT graft.Registration: NCT02642692 (ClinicalTrials.gov).

"Fishing net" suture augmenting tension-band wiring fixation in the treatment of inferior pole fracture of the patella.

Inferior pole fracture of the patella (IPFP) is difficult to repair and stabilize clinically. Although various fixation techniques have been developed, fixation strength and mobility remain daunting challenges to orthopedic surgeons. The goal of this research is to evaluate the biomechanical strength and clinical outcomes of a novel "fishing net" suture fixation procedure. Four finite element models, modified tension-band wiring fixation, anchor suture fixation, basket plate fixation and "fishing net" suture fixation were built to compare the fixing efficacy of "fishing net" suture fixation with three other fixation methods during IPFP fixation. From January 2018 to February 2019, 17 patients who suffered IPFP and treated by "fishing net" suture (FNS) fixation were compared with 20 patients treated by tension-band wiring (TBW) fixation in database and the two groups were evaluated postoperatively using the modified Cincinnati knee rating system. Biomechanical evaluation showed that the relative displacement values of proximal patella measured by three pairs of points on both sides of the fracture line were the lowest using the "fishing net" suture fixation, while fixation using tension-band wiring and basket plate showed similar levels of stability that were less desirable than the "fishing net" method. As to clinical outcomes, there were 17 (100%) patients exhibited excellent or good results with no internal fixation failures in the FNS group compared to three internal fixation failures in the TBW group. The biomechanical and clinical results suggest that the "fishing net" suture fixation is a viable candidate for fixation of IPFP.

Functional result of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction by remnant preservation in a tertiary center in Eastern India

&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Background:&lt;/strong&gt; Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction is one of the most common procedures in orthopaedics. Orthopaedic surgery is vastly evolving to give better functional outcome. Apart from stability, proprioception, ligament healing are important factors for return to sports. The presence of remnant containing mechanoreceptors and free neural endings can help reinnervate the ACL auto graft. Aims and objectives were to evaluate clinical outcomes in patients undergoing ACL reconstruction with remnant preservation.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Methods&lt;/strong&gt;: One hundred and six patients who underwent ACL reconstruction between April 2014 and March 2020. Among these 80 patients underwent remnant preservation. Analysis is done based on international knee documentation committee score (IKDC), modified Cincinnati knee rating system (MCKRS) and Tegner-Lysholm scoring system. Other factors are Lachman test, pivot shift test, return to sports and graft rupture rate.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Results:&lt;/strong&gt; Lachman test became negative in 98% at 12 weeks and in all the patients at 24 months post-operatively. 74 patients (92.5%) among 80 patients develop full range of knee movement after ACL surgery. Post-operative scores are 95, 93, and 92 respectively.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Conclusions: &lt;/strong&gt;Remnant preserving ACL reconstruction having excellent clinical outcome with good knee stability, early return to sports activities and no incidence of graft rupture in our series.&lt;/p&gt;

Knee articular cartilage injury treatment with matrix-induced autologous chondrocyte implantation (MACI): correlation at 24 and 120\xa0months between clinical and radiological findings using MR arthrography

ObjectiveTo evaluate the long-term evolution of matrix-induced autologous chondrocyte implantation (MACI) with magnetic resonance (MR) arthrography and verify the correlation between radiological and clinical findings.Materials and methodsTwenty-six patients (20 m/6f) were diagnosed with knee chondral injuries and treated with MACI implantation. Each patient received MR arthrography and clinical examination at mid-term (range 22–36 months) and long term (range 96–194 months) after surgery. MR arthrography was performed with dedicated coil and a 1.5-Tesla MR unit. The modified MOCART scale was used to evaluate the status of chondral implants. Implant coating, integration to the border zone, and the surface and structure of the repaired tissue were evaluated. Presence of bone marrow oedema was evaluated. The Cincinnati Knee Rating System (CKRS) was used for clinical assessment.ResultsAt long term, 4/26 patients had complete alignment; 5/26 had a complete integration of the margins; in 4/26 cases, the implant surface was undamaged; in 14/26 cases, the reparative tissue was homogeneous. In 9/26 cases, the implant showed isointense signal compared to articular cartilage, while the presence of subchondral bone oedema was documented in 19/26 cases. The average radiological score decreased from 59.2 (mid-term) to 38.6 (long term). The average clinical score decreased from 8.9 to 8.3.ConclusionsDecrease in clinical results was not significant (0.6 points p = .06), but mMOCART scores decreased significantly (p = .00003). Although imaging studies showed deterioration of the grafts, the patients did not have significant clinical deterioration (231/250).