Cinacalcet In Patients Research Articles

Cinacalcet in patients with secondary hyperparathyroidism; a review

Secondary hyperparathyroidism is a common complication of chronic kidney disease characterized by excessive secretion of parathyroid hormone from the parathyroid glands. Cinacalcet is a calcimimetic medication that reduces parathormone levels by increasing the sensitivity of the calcium-sensing receptors on the parathyroid glands. This review aims to summarize the existing literature on the use of cinacalcet in patients with secondary hyperparathyroidism.

Cinacalcet in patients with primary hyperparathyroidism; a review

Primary hyperparathyroidism (PHPT) is a condition characterized by the parathyroid glands’ overproduction of parathyroid hormone (PTH). These increases calcium levels in the blood, leading to various symptoms and complications. Cinacalcet is a promising therapeutic option for patients with PHPT who are unable or unwilling to undergo surgery. It effectively reduces serum calcium and PTH levels, improving biochemical markers of bone turnover and renal function. However, more research is needed to determine the optimal dosage, duration, and long-term effects of cinacalcet treatment in this patient population. Clinicians should carefully consider the risks and benefits of cinacalcet therapy individually and involve patients in shared decision-making.

A single-centre retrospective analysis of cinacalcet therapy in primary hyperparathyroidism.

Primary hyperparathyroidism (pHPT) is a common endocrine disorder that can be cured by parathyroidectomy; patients unsuitable for surgery can be treated with cinacalcet. Availability of surgery may be reduced during COVID-19, and cinacalcet can be used as bridging therapy. In this single-centre retrospective analysis, we investigated the utility and safety of cinacalcet in patients with pHPT receiving cinacalcet between March 2019 and July 2020, including pre-parathyroidectomy bridging. We reviewed and summarised the published literature. Cinacalcet dosages were adjusted by endocrinologists to achieve target calcium < 2.70 mmol/L. Eighty-six patients were identified, with the most achieving target calcium (79.1%) with a mean dose of 39.4 mg/day (±17.1 mg/day) for a median duration of 35 weeks (1–178 weeks). Calcium was normalised in a median time of 5 weeks. The majority of patients commenced cinacalcet of 30 mg/day (78 patients) with the remainder at 60 mg/day (8 patients). Forty-seven patients commencing lower dose cinacalcet (30 mg/day) achieved target calcium without requiring 60 mg/day. Baseline PTH was significantly higher in patients requiring higher doses of cinacalcet. 18.6% of patients reported adverse reactions and 4.7% discontinued cinacalcet. Patients treated with cinacalcet pre-parathyroidectomy required a higher dose and fewer achieved target calcium compared to medical treatment with cinacalcet alone. Post-operative calcium was similar to patients who were not given pre-parathyroidectomy cinacalcet. In summary, cinacalcet at an initial dose of 30 mg/day is safe and useful for achieving target calcium in patients with symptomatic or severe hypercalcaemia in pHPT, including those treated for pre-parathyroidectomy. We propose a PTH threshold of >30 pmol/L to initiate at a higher dose of 60 mg/day.

P1748PARATHYROIDECTOMY REMAINS EFFECTIVE FOR TREATING TERTIARY HYPERPARATHYROIDISM: LONG-TERM RESULTS OF A RANDOMIZED STUDY

Abstract Background and Aims Tertiary hyperparathyroidism is a common cause of hypercalcemia after kidney transplant (KT) and has been associated with renal dysfunction, loss bone mineral density and increased risk of fracture, vascular calcification, and increased risk of cardiovascular events. Long clinical management remains controversial. The aim of this study is to evaluate the long-term effectiveness and safety of parathyroidectomy versus cinacalcet in patients with persistent hyperparathyroidism. Method A 12-month prospective, multicenter, randomized study demonstrated than subtotal parathyroidectomy is more effective than cinacalcet for controlling hypercalcemia. Now, we evaluate in the same cohort of patients if this effect is maintained after 5 years of follow-up. Laboratory assessment included serum calcium, serum phosphate, intact parathyroid hormone (iPTH), calcidiol levels, estimated glomerular filtration rate and proteinuria at 2, 3, 4 and 5 year follow-up. Therapeutic details about the use of vitamin D, calcium supplementation and phosphate binders were compiled. Fragility fractures were also collected. Results In total, 24 patients had data available at 5 years, 13 in the cinacalcet group and 11 in the parathyroidectomy group. At 5 years, six of 13 patients in the cinacalcet group and ten of 11 patients in the parathyroidectomy group (p=0.015) showed normocalcemia (Figure 1). Subtotal parathyroidectomy retained a greater reduction of iPTH compared with cinacalcet group (Figure 2). No differences were observed in kidney function and incidence of fragility fractures between both groups. In relation of treatment, 8 of 13 patients in cinacalcet group maintained treatment with cinacalcet after 5 years follow-up. Conclusion Subtotal parathyroidectomy is more effective in long term to maintain normal serum calcium and iPTH compared with cinacalcet in kidney transplant patients with tertiary hyperparathyroidism.

SAT-361 Familial Hypocalciuric Hypercalcemia Type 3: AP2S1 Mutation

Background: Familial hypocalciuric hypercalcemia (FHH) type 3 can appear similar to primary hyperparathyroidism and make the diagnosis of etiology of hypercalcemia challenging.Clinical Case: A 45-year-old man with hypertension and glaucoma was evaluated in clinic for hypercalcemia. His calcium was 12.3 mg/dL (8.4–10.2), PTH 41.9 pg/mL (15–65), Vitamin D 14.8 ng/mL (6.6–49) and phosphorus 1.7 mg/dL (2.7–4.5). He denied history of thiazide diuretic use, fragility fracture, nephrolithiasis and family history of calcium disorders. Further workup revealed normal kidney function, undetectable PTH related peptide and dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DEXA) scan with a T-score of -3.3 at spine L1-L4, -2.7 at femoral neck and -2.1 at distal one-third forearm. A 24-hour urine collection revealed a urinary calcium of 42.4 mg/24-hour (100–300) and calcium: creatinine clearance ratio of 0.003. Diagnosis of primary hyperparathyroidism was made despite low urinary calcium as this was thought to be due to vitamin D deficiency. Sestamibi scintigraphy and four-dimensional computed tomography did not localize a parathyroid adenoma, however, the patient was sent to surgery for four gland parathyroid exploration for primary hyperparathyroidism in setting of high calcium and young age with evidence of end-organ failure of osteoporosis. During surgery, three large abnormal parathyroid glands were identified and one normal parathyroid gland. Patient had a three-gland parathyroidectomy with intraoperative drop in PTH by 26.5%. Pathology returned as benign parathyroid tissues. After surgery, patient had persistently elevated calcium level of 12.6 mg/dL and an inappropriately non-suppressed PTH. He was then started on bisphosphonate and cinacalcet for osteoporosis and hypercalcemia, respectively and sent for genetic testing of FHH. His CASR gene was negative but his AP2S1 gene was positive which confirmed the diagnosis of FHH type 3. His calcium responded well to cinacalcet and repeat DEXA scan showed stability of bone mineral density in spine and hip after two years of treatment with bisphosphonate therapy.Conclusion: Familial hypocalciuric hypercalcemia type 3 is caused by an inactivating mutation in the AP2S1 gene. This gene encodes the adaptor-related protein complex 2, sigma 1 subunit which is located downstream from calcium-sensing receptor. This genetic mutation can appear similar to primary hyperparathyroidism in that it produces high levels of calcium and PTH and low phosphorus. Hypercalcemia, however, persists despite removal of parathyroid gland. This genetic mutation can be treated with cinacalcet in patients with high levels of calcium (>1 upper limit of normal) or symptoms of hypercalcemia.

Denosumab and cinacalcet for primary hyperparathyroidism (DENOCINA): a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trial

Medical treatment options for primary hyperparathyroidism are scarce. We aimed to assess the efficacy of denosumab and combined with cinacalcet in patients with primary hyperparathyroidism. In this randomised, single-centre, proof-of-concept, double-blind trial, patients aged at least 18 years with primary hyperparathyroidism were recruited from the Department of Endocrinology, Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark. Key eligibility criteria were a T-score between -1·0 and -3·5 at the lumbar spine, femoral neck, or total hip. Patients were assigned (1:1:1) via permuted block randomisation to receive 30 mg cinacalcet per day plus 60 mg denosumab subcutaneously every 6 months (n=14; combination group) for 1 year, denosumab plus placebo (n=16; denosumab group) for 1 year, or placebo plus placebo injection (n=15; placebo group) for 1 year. Primary outcomes were changes in bone mineral density (BMD) measured by dual x-ray absorptiometry at the lumbar spine, total hip, femoral neck, and distal forearm after 1 year. Additionally, effects on bone-metabolic biochemistry were explored. Patients and investigators were masked. All enrolled patients were included in efficacy analyses. The trial was done in an outpatient setting and is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03027557, and has been completed. Between March 14, 2017, and March 16, 2018 we recruited 285 participants. 16 patients were randomly allocated to the denosumab group, 15 to the combination group, and 15 to the placebo group. Dropout was limited to one patient in the combination group. Compared with placebo, BMD improved in groups receiving denosumab: lumbar spine (combination group 5·4% [95% CI 2·7-8·1], denosumab group 6·9% [95% CI 4·2-9·6]; p<0·0001), total hip (combination group 5·0% [3·0-6·9], denosumab group 4·1% [2·5-5·8]; p<0·0001), and femoral neck (combination group 4·5% [1·9-7·9]; p=0·0008, denosumab group 3·8% [1·4-6·3]; p=0·0022]). Changes in BMD at the third distal forearm were borderline significant. Six non-fatal serious adverse events occurred (combination group [n=2], denosumab group [n=1], placebo group [n=3]). The overall prevalence of adverse events did not differ between treatment groups, and no fatal adverse events occurred. Evidence suggested denosumab was effective in improving BMD and lowering bone turnover in patients with primary hyperparathyroidism irrespective of cinacalcet treatment and might be a valid option for patients in which surgery is undesirable. Aalborg University Hospital and Aalborg University, Denmark.

Pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics ofcinacalcet in patients with renal failure receiving hemodialysis and hemodiafiltrationtherapy .

Few studies have focused on the effects of dialysis on cinacalcet. In addition, there is no data available on hemodiafiltration (HDF) all over the world. Therefore, we studied the pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) of cinacalcet in patients undergoing hemodialysis (HD) or HDF to provide more guiding information on its use in these patients, especially in China. In this open-label, single-dose, single-center study of 7 patients with renal failure who underwent dialysis, patients were randomly allocated to two groups consisting of 4 and 3 patients who received low-flux HD and HDF treatments, respectively. All participants underwent dialysis for 4 hours immediately after receiving single oral doses of a 25mg cinacalcet tablet. High-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (HPLC-MS/MS) and electrochemical luminescence (EI) were used to determine the cinacalcet plasma concentrations and intact parathyroid hormone (iPTH) serum levels, respectively. Peak concentration (Cmax) and area under the curve (AUC) from time 0 to 24 hours (AUC0-24h) of the low-flux HD therapy group were 21.8±18.6 ng/mL and 145.3±91.8 ng×h/mL, respectively, which were similar to those of the HDF group (30.9±7.9 ng/mL and 161.6±26.5 ng×h/mL, respectively). iPTH concentrations of the HD therapy group decreased after cinacalcet administration and increased following its clearance. However, iPTH levels of subjects receiving HDF therapy did not change. Compared with healthy Chinese subjects, patients with renal failure had a higher Cmax and AUC0-24h, slightly prolonged time to Cmax (tmax) after administration of the same dose of cinacalcet. On HD treatment day, variation trends of iPTH in Chinese patients and healthy subjects were similar and significantly different from that on the HDF treatment day. Considering the high protein binding rate of cinacalcet, this may lead to the great free-drug clearance during HDF treatment.

Clinical use of Cinacalcet in patients with complex primary hyperparathyroidism

Clinical use of Cinacalcet in patients with complex primary hyperparathyroidism

Timely and dose assessment of serum parathormone and calcium levels by cinacalcet in patients with primary hyperparathyroidism: an individualized approach

Searchable abstracts of presentations at key conferences in endocrinology ISSN 1470-3947 (print) | ISSN 1479-6848 (online)

Calcium-Sensing Receptor Genotype and Response to Cinacalcet in Patients Undergoing Hemodialysis.

We tested the hypothesis that single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in the calcium-sensing receptor (CASR) alter the response to the calcimimetic cinacalcet. We analyzed DNA samples in the Evaluation of Cinacalcet HCl Therapy to Lower Cardiovascular Events (EVOLVE) trial, a randomized trial comparing cinacalcet to placebo on a background of usual care. Of the 3883 patients randomized, 1919 (49%) consented to DNA collection, and samples from 1852 participants were genotyped for 18 CASR polymorphisms. The European ancestry (EA; n=1067) and African ancestry (AfAn; n=405) groups were assessed separately. SNPs in CASR were tested for their association with biochemical measures of mineral metabolism at baseline, percent change from baseline to 20 weeks, and risk of clinical fracture as dependent variables. There were modest associations of CASR SNPs with increased baseline serum parathyroid hormone and bone alkaline phosphatase primarily with the minor allele in the EA group (all P≤0.03), but not in the AfAn sample. In contrast, there was a modest association of decreased baseline serum calcium and FGF23 with CASR SNPs (P=0.04) primarily with the minor allele in the AfAn but not in the EA sample. The minor allele of two SNPs was associated with decreased percent reduction in parathyroid hormone from baseline to 20 weeks in the EA population (P<0.04) and this was not altered with cinacalcet. In both EA and AfAn, the same SNP (rs9740) was associated with decreased calcium with cinacalcet treatment (EA and AfAn P≤0.03). Three SNPs in high linkage disequilibrium were associated with a higher risk of clinical fracture that was attenuated by cinacalcet treatment in the EA sample (P<0.04). These modest associations, if validated, may provide explanations for differences in CKD-mineral bone disorder observed in EA and AfAn populations, and for differential biochemical responses to calcimimetics.

Effectiveness of Cinacalcet in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease and Secondary Hyperparathyroidism Not Receiving Dialysis.

BackgroundSecondary hyperparathyroidism (SHPT) is a common complication in chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients. Cinacalcet could be a therapeutic option although its use is controversial in patients not receiving dialysis. Thus, the aim of this study is to assess the effectiveness and safety of cinacalcet in patients with CKD and SHPT without renal replacement treatment (RRT) and without renal transplantation (RT).MethodsA retrospective observational study was conducted. Patients were included if they had collected cinacalcet, under off-label use, during 2010 and 2011. Patients selected were followed from the beginning of cinacalcet therapy for one year of treatment.ResultsA total of 37 patients were included with CKD stage 3 (38%), 4 (51%) and 5 (11%). Baseline mean PTH value was 400.86 ± 168.60 mg/dl. At 12 months, a 67% of patients achieved at least a 30% reduction in their PTH value (p<0.001; CI 49.7–83.6), and the overall mean reduction of PTH values was 38% (p< 0.001; IC -49.1, -27.5). A 28% of the patients achieved KDOQI PTH goals (p = 0.003, CI 12%-50%). At 12 months, mean serum calcium values decreased by 6% and mean serum phosphorus values increased by 13%. A 19% of patients experienced hypocalcemia episodes while an increase of 24% in hyperphosphatemia episodes was observed. A 25% of patients finished cinacalcet before a year of treatment. Main withdrawal reasons were: gastrointestinal and other discomfort (8%), hypocalcaemia (8%), non-compliance (3%), interactions (3%) and excess of efficacy (3%).ConclusionsCinacalcet was effective in patients with CKD and SHPT not receiving dialysis. Electrolytic imbalances could be managed with administration of vitamin D and analogues or phosphate binders.

Economic Evaluation of Cinacalcet in the United States: The EVOLVE Trial

BackgroundPrevious economic evaluations of cinacalcet in patients with secondary hyperparathyroidism (sHPT) relied on the combination of surrogate end points in clinical trials and epidemiologic studies. ObjectivesThe objective was to conduct an economic evaluation of cinacalcet on the basis of the EValuation Of Cinacalcet HCl Therapy to Lower CardioVascular Events (EVOLVE) trial from a US payer perspective. MethodsWe developed a semi-Markov model to assess the cost-effectiveness of cinacalcet in addition to conventional therapy, compared with conventional therapy alone, in patients with moderate-to-severe sHPT receiving hemodialysis. We used treatment effect estimates from the unadjusted intent-to-treat (ITT) analysis and prespecified covariate-adjusted ITT analysis as our main analyses. We assessed model sensitivity to variations in individual inputs and overall decision uncertainty through probabilistic sensitivity analyses. ResultsThe incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) for cinacalcet was $61,705 per life-year and $79,562 per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained using the covariate-adjusted ITT analysis. Probabilistic sensitivity analysis suggested a 73.2% chance of the ICER being below a willingness-to-pay threshold of $100,000. Treatment effects from unadjusted ITT analysis yielded an ICER of $115,876 per QALY. The model was most sensitive to the treatment effect on mortality. ConclusionsIn the unadjusted ITT analysis, cinacalcet does not represent a cost- effective use of health care resources when applying a willingness-to-pay threshold of $100,000 per QALY. When using the covariate-adjusted ITT treatment effect, which represents the least biased estimate, however, cinacalcet is a cost-effective therapy for patients with moderate-to-severe sHPT on hemodialysis.

Tolerance and efficacy of a low dose of the calcimimetic agent cinacalcet in controlling moderate to severe secondary hyperparathyroidism in hemodialysis patients.

Secondary hyperparathyroidism is almost a constant feature in chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients maintained on hemodialysis (HD). Calcimimetic agents appear to offer an alternative to surgery in controlling secondary hyperparathyroidism in these patients. Recent studies provide conflicting data on the benefits, efficacy and tolerance of cinacalcet as first-line therapy for the treatment of secondary hyperparathyroidism in CKD. This study was designed to investigate the efficacy and tolerance of a low dose of the calcimimetic agent cinacalcet in patients on long-term HD having moderate to severe secondary hyperparathyroidism. Twenty five adult male patients on HD for more than three years were included in the study. All had moderate to severe secondary hyperparathyroidism with serum intact parathyroid hormone (iPTH) >50 pmol/L, resistant to conventional treatment. We used the targets of Chronic Kidney Disease: Outcomes Quality Initiative (K/DOQI) clinical guidelines as optimal target of serum iPTH, calcium and phosphate. Patients were administered cinacalcet as a single oral daily dose of 30 mg and were followed-up for six months. Cinacalcet treatment for six months resulted in a significant reduction in the serum phosphate and iPTH levels while the serum calcium levels remained unchanged. Thirty-six percent of the patients attained the recommended serum iPTH levels, 40% achieved significant reduction of the serum iPTH levels and 24% showed no favorable response. Only one patient dropped out because of severe gastrointestinal symptoms. Our results suggest that treatment of CKD patients, having moderate to severe secondary hyperparathyroidism, with low-dose cinacalcet is effective and well tolerated.

A Randomized Study Evaluating Cinacalcet to Treat Hypercalcemia in Renal Transplant Recipients With Persistent Hyperparathyroidism

Persistent hyperparathyroidism (HPT) after kidney transplantation (KTx) is associated with hypercalcemia, hypophosphatemia and abnormally high levels of parathyroid hormone (PTH). In this randomized trial, cinacalcet was compared to placebo for the treatment of hypercalcemia in adult patients with persistent HPT after KTx. Subjects were randomized 1:1 to cinacalcet or placebo with randomization stratified by baseline corrected total serum calcium levels (≤11.2 mg/dL [2.80 mmol/L] or >11.2 mg/dL [2.80 mmol/L]). The primary end point was achievement of a mean corrected total serum calcium value<10.2 mg/dL (2.55 mmol/L) during the efficacy period. The two key secondary end points were percent change in bone mineral density (BMD) at the femoral neck and absolute change in phosphorus; 78.9% cinacalcet- versus 3.5% placebo-treated subjects achieved the primary end point with a difference of 75.4% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 63.8, 87.1), p<0.001. There was no statistical difference in the percent change in BMD at the femoral neck between cinacalcet and placebo groups, p=0.266. The difference in the change in phosphorus between the two arms was 0.45 mg/dL (95% CI: 0.26, 0.64), p<0.001 (nominal). No new safety signals were detected. In conclusion, hypercalcemia and hypophosphatemia were effectively corrected after treatment with cinacalcet in patients with persistent HPT after KTx.

Cinacalcet Induces Apoptosis in Parathyroid Cells in Patients with Secondary Hyperparathyroidism: Histological and Cytological Analyses

Background/Aims: Previous studies reported a reduction in parathyroid gland volume during treatment with cinacalcet in patients with secondary hyperparathyroidism (SHPT). However, it remains to be determined whether cinacalcet accelerates apoptosis of hyperplastic parathyroid cells in these patients. Methods: The study subjects were 16 hemodialysis patients who had undergone parathyroidectomy for severe SHPT. We compared the expression of the apoptotic marker TUNEL and the proliferative marker Ki67 by immunohistochemistry and the expression of CYP27B1 by quantitative real-time PCR in hyperplastic parathyroid glands from patients treated with cinacalcet (cinacalcet group; n = 8) and those not treated with cinacalcet (non-cinacalcet group; n = 8). We also examined the effect of cinacalcet on parathyroid cell death in in vitro cell culture with TUNEL staining, using parathyroid cells from SHPT patients. Results: Compared with the non-cinacalcet group, the expression of TUNEL was significantly increased but was accompanied with significantly increased Ki67 expression in the parathyroid glands from the cinacalcet group. In vitro examination showed dose- and time-dependent increases of apoptotic cells by adding cinacalcet into culture medium. We also found that the expression of CYP27B1 showed a three-fold increase in glands from the cinacalcet group compared to that of the non-cinacalcet group. Conclusion: Our data suggest that cinacalcet induces apoptosis of human parathyroid cells, but this effect may be overcome by more aggressive proliferation of parathyroid cells in patients with severe, cinacalcet-resistant SHPT.

Cinacalcet for hypercalcaemic secondary hyperparathyroidism after renal transplantation: a multicentre, retrospective, 3‐year study

Our aim was to evaluate the long-term effect of cinacalcet in patients with hypercalcaemic secondary hyperparathyroidism (SHPT) after renal transplantation (RT) in order to expand real-world data in this population. We performed a multicentre, observational, retrospective study in 17 renal transplant units from Spain. We collected data from renal recipients with hypercalcaemic (calcium >10.2 mg/dL) SHPT (intact parathyroid hormone (iPTH) > 120 pg/mL) who initiated cinacalcet in the clinical practice. We included 193 patients with a mean (standard deviation (SD)) age of 52 (12) years, 58% men. Cinacalcet treatment was initiated at a median of 20 months after RT (median dose 30 mg/day). Mean calcium levels decreased from a mean (SD) of 11.1 (0.6) at baseline to 10.1 (0.8) at 6 months (9.0% reduction, P < 0.0001). Median iPTH was reduced by 23.0% at 6 months (P = 0.0005) and mean phosphorus levels increased by 11.1% (P < 0.0001). The effects were maintained up to 3-years. No changes were observed in renal function or anticalcineurin drug levels. Only 4.1% of patients discontinued cinacalcet due to intolerance and 1.0% due to lack of efficacy. In renal transplant patients with hypercalcaemic SHPT, cinacalcet controlled serum calcium, iPTH and phosphorus levels up to 3 years. Tolerability was good.

Cinacalcet in the management of normocalcaemic secondary hyperparathyroidism after kidney transplantation: one-year follow-up multicentre study

The effect of cinacalcet in patients with persistent secondary hyperparathyroidism (SHPT) after kidney transplantation (RT) has mainly been reported in patients with secondary hypercalcaemia. Our objective was to assess the long-term effect of cinacalcet on patients with a RT and normocalcaemic SHPT. A one-year multicentre, observational, retrospective study that included kidney recipients with SHPT (intact parathyroid hormone [iPTH] >120 pg/ml) and calcium levels within the normal range (8.4-10.2 mg/dl). Patients began treatment with cinacalcet in clinical practice. 32 patients with a mean age (standard deviation [SD]) of 54 (11) years, 56% male, were included in the study. Treatment with cinacalcet began a median of 16 months after RT (median dose of 30 mg/day). Levels of iPTH decreased from a median (P25, P75) of 364 (220, 531) pg/ml at the start of the study to 187 (98, 320) after 6 months (48.6% reduction, P=.001) and to 145 (91, 195) after 12 months (60.2% reduction, P=.001), without there being changes in calcium and phosphorus levels (P=.214 and P=.216, respectively). No changes were observed in kidney function or anti-calcineuric drug levels. 3.1% of patients discontinued cinacalcet due to intolerance and 6.2% due to a lack of efficacy. In patients with normocalcaemic SHPT after RT, cinacalcet improves the control of serum PTH values without causing changes to calcaemia, phosphataemia or kidney function. Cinacalcet showed good tolerability.

Cinacalcet in Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease: A Cumulative Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

Calcimimetic agents lower serum parathyroid hormone levels in people with chronic kidney disease (CKD), but treatment effects on patient-relevant outcomes are uncertain. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to summarize the benefits and harms of calcimimetic therapy in adults with CKD and used cumulative meta-analysis to identify how evidence for calcimimetic treatment has developed in this clinical setting. Cochrane and Embase databases (through February 7, 2013) were electronically searched to identify randomized trials evaluating effects of calcimimetic therapy on mortality and adverse events in adults with CKD. Two independent reviewers identified trials, extracted data, and assessed risk of bias. Eighteen trials comprising 7,446 participants compared cinacalcet plus conventional therapy with placebo or no treatment plus conventional therapy in adults with CKD. In moderate- to high-quality evidence (based on Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation criteria) in adults with CKD stage 5D (dialysis), cinacalcet had little or no effect on all-cause mortality (relative risk, 0.97 [95% confidence interval, 0.89-1.05]), had imprecise effect on cardiovascular mortality (0.67 [0.16-2.87]), and prevented parathyroidectomy (0.49 [0.40-0.59]) and hypercalcemia (0.23 [0.05-0.97]), but increased hypocalcemia (6.98 [5.10-9.53]), nausea (2.02 [1.45-2.81]), and vomiting (1.97 [1.73-2.24]). Data for clinical outcomes were sparse in adults with CKD stages 3-5. On average, treating 1,000 people with CKD stage 5D for 1 y had no effect on survival and prevented about three patients from experiencing parathyroidectomy, whilst 60 experienced hypocalcemia and 150 experienced nausea. Analyses were limited by insufficient data in CKD stages 3-5 and kidney transplant recipients. Cinacalcet reduces the need for parathyroidectomy in patients with CKD stage 5D, but does not appear to improve all-cause or cardiovascular mortality. Additional trials in CKD stage 5D are unlikely to change our confidence in the treatment effects of cinacalcet in this population.

Cinacalcet in patients with primary hyperparathyroidism (PHPT): comparison between sporadic and MEN1 PHPT

Cinacalcet in patients with primary hyperparathyroidism (PHPT): comparison between sporadic and MEN1 PHPT

MEN1-related hyperparathyroidism: response to cinacalcet and its relationship with the calcium-sensing receptor gene variant Arg990Gly

Primary hyperparathyroidism (PHPT) is a challenging problem in type 1 multiple endocrine neoplasia (MEN1) due to the high postsurgery recurrence rate. The aim was to evaluate the efficacy of cinacalcet in MEN1 patients in comparison with patients with sporadic PHPT (sPHPT) and the effect of Arg990Gly calcium-sensing receptor (CASR) polymorphism on the response to treatment. This is a randomized, crossover, double-blind study carried out in the University Hospitals. Fifteen MEN1 patients with PHPT were randomized to two groups, one administered with 30 mg daily cinacalcet, titrated until calcium normalization, and one with placebo. After 3 months, patients were reassessed and after washout switched to the other treatment. For comparison, 20 sPHPT patients with similar calcium levels were administered with cinacalcet for 3 months. Ionized and total calcium, phosphate, and parathyroid hormone (PTH) were evaluated. CASR Arg990Gly was genotyped on blood DNA by direct sequencing. Cinacalcet normalized calcium, increased phosphate, and reduced PTH levels in all patients. Cinacalcet dosage required to normalize calcium in MEN1 and sPHPT was not significantly different (45±21 vs 54±25 mg/day). Few mild adverse events, not requiring drug withdrawal, were observed in both the groups. No association between Arg990Gly CASR polymorphism and response to cinacalcet was found. This short-term prospective study demonstrated that the efficacy profile of cinacalcet in patients with MEN1-related PHPT and in those with sPHPT was similar and was not influenced by the 990 CASR variant. Although long-term safety and efficacy data are required, cinacalcet might be considered a treatment option in MEN1 patients who have contraindications to surgery or persistent PHPT after surgery.