Fifty years ago, Kinsey1 published the results of a cooperative study of what was then called retrolental fibroplasia (RLF) and the use of oxygen. Infants who weighed <1.5 kg and survived the first 48 hours were enrolled in this multicenter study. Of the 590 survivors who had an adequate eye examination, 533 infants had received curtailed oxygen and 53 had received routine oxygen. Of those infants who received routine oxygen, 38 (75%) had vascular changes of RLF (stage 1–3 retinopathy of prematurity [ROP]) and 12 (25%) had cicatricial RLF (stage 4–5 ROP). Among the 533 infants with curtailed oxygen, 178 had vascular changes (33%) of RLF and 35 (7%) had cicatricial RLF. This trial, sponsored by the National Society for the Prevention of Blindness and the National Institute of Neurologic Disease and Blindness, was notable for providing a multicenter clinical trial that halted the indiscriminate use of oxygen, which had been responsible for the blinding of thousands of children. This therapeutic misadventure had occurred because of medicine's ability to introduce the technology of supplemental oxygen in incubators without ways of measuring the physiologic impact on the preterm infant. At that time, there was no consistent ability to measure arterial blood gases, no uniform classification system for ROP, and limited opportunities for collaboration between neonatologists, ophthalmologists, neurodevelopmentalists, and epidemiologists.2–4 From this study, as well as the tort legal system that was quickly and vigorously pursued by the American Bar, a <40% restricted–supplemental oxygen policy was implemented in NICUs. In 1960, Avery5 demonstrated the down side of this restricted-oxygen era by … Address correspondence to Michael E. Msall MD, University of Chicago Pritzker School of Medicine, Kennedy Mental Retardation Center, Comer Children's and LaRabida Children's Hospitals, 5841 S Maryland Ave, MC0900, Chicago, IL 60637. E-mail: mmsall{at}peds.bsd.uchicago.edu