Chronic Oral Anticoagulation Research Articles

Abstract 4125076: Catheter Ablation Alone Versus Catheter Ablation With Combined Percutaneous Left Atrial Appendage Closure For Atrial Fibrillation: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Background: Combined catheter ablation (CA) with left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) may produce comprehensive treatment for atrial fibrillation (AF) whereby rhythm control is achieved and stroke risk is reduced without the need for chronic oral anticoagulation. However, the efficacy and safety of this strategy is still controversial. Aim: To investigate the efficacy and safety of a combined CA with LAAC approach to treat AF in patients moderate-to-high-risk for bleeding. Methods: This meta-analysis was reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Medline, Scopus, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were systematically searched to identify relevant studies. Risk of bias was assessed using the Modified Newcastle-Ottawa scale and Cochrane risk of bias tool. Eligible studies reported outcomes in patients with AF who underwent combined CA and LAAC versus CA alone. Studies performing CA without pulmonary vein isolation were excluded. Results: Eight studies comprising 1878 patients were included (2 RCT, 6 observational). Pooled results showed no difference in arrhythmia recurrence (risk ratio [RR] 1.05; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.84-1.30), stroke or systemic embolism (RR 0.71; 95% CI 0.26-1.94), total procedure time (mean difference 31.45 minutes; 95% CI -5.91-68.81), or major periprocedural complications (RR 1.28; 95% CI 0.28-5.89) when comparing combined CA and LAAC versus CA alone. Conclusion: Combined CA with LAAC for AF is associated with similar rates of arrhythmia free survival, stroke, major periprocedural complications, and procedure time when compared to CA alone. A combined strategy may be as safe and efficacious for patients moderate-to-high-risk for bleeding events to negate the need for chronic oral anticoagulation.

Pretreatment with dual antiplatelet therapy in acute myocardial infarction

Abstract Background Combined antithrombotic therapy prevents thrombus progression and its components embolization, and thus, it has an essential role in coronary microcirculation (re)perfusion in acute myocardial infarction (AMI). Pretreatment with P2Y12 inhibitors, on top of aspirin, before primary angioplasty has not been satisfactorily studied in STEMI. Purpose To investigate the impact of combined antiplatelet therapy on-treatment on the outcome of patients with STEMI. Methods Patients who suffered STEMI during the 7 years (1/2016-12/2022) were included. The analysis is based on population data from the National Health Information System (NHIS). Information on AMIs from the Intervention Module of the Registry of Cardiovascular Operations and Interventions was combined with prescription data from the Registry of Reimbursed Health Services 6 months before MI and identification of deceased patients from the Registry of Death Records. Data from the NHIS covers almost 100% of all cases in the population. Standard descriptive statistics and test were applied in the analysis. Multivariate logistic regression adjusted for clinical and procedural characteristics was adopted to analyze the influence of pretreatment on the risk of 1) out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA), 2) clinical condition at admission – need of mechanical ventilation and circulatory instability (Killip III,IV), 3) initial TIMI flow through the infarct-related coronary artery (IRA ), and 4) short term mortality. Results The study sample consisted of data from 40,383 STEMIs of which 1,601 patients were on dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) with aspirin plus iP2Y12 lasting 1 to 6 months before the event occurred. Patients on chronic oral anticoagulation (N 2101) were excluded. Patients on DAPT versus those without antiplatelet therapy or on aspirin at a daily dose of 100 mg were older, had higher comorbidity rates, and were at higher risk of mortality (Table). The multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that patients on DAPT at the time of MI onset and lasting for at least one month had a higher likelihood of preserved perfusion through the IRA (Odds ratio and 95% Confidence interval, OR (95% CI) 1. 193 (1.074; 1.326), p=0.001). However, the DAPT pretreatment did not reduce the risk of OHCA, the need for mechanical ventilation, or initial circulatory destabilization. It did not positively affect the prognosis of the patients (Figure ). Conclusion The significant benefit of the DAPT pretreatment on the preservation of infarct-related coronary artery flow did not translate into a positive effect on the prognosis of STEMI patients.

Catheter ablation alone versus catheter ablation with combined percutaneous left atrial appendage closure for atrial fibrillation: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Combined catheter ablation (CA) with percutaneous left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) may produce comprehensive treatment for atrial fibrillation (AF) whereby rhythm control is achieved and stroke risk is reduced without the need for chronic oral anticoagulation. However, the efficacy and safety of this strategy is still controversial. This meta-analysis was reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analyses guidelines. Medline, Scopus, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were systematically searched to identify relevant studies. The risk of bias was assessed using the Modified Newcastle-Ottawa scale and Cochrane risk of bias tool. Eligible studies reported outcomes in patients with AF who underwent combined CA and LAAC vs CA alone. Studies performing CA without pulmonary vein isolation were excluded. Eight studies comprising 1878 patients were included (2 RCT, 6 observational). When comparing combined CA and LAAC vs CA alone, pooled results showed no difference in arrhythmia recurrence (risk ratio (RR) 1.04; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.82-1.33), stroke or systemic embolism (RR 0.78; 95% CI 0.27-2.22), or major periprocedural complications (RR 1.28; 95% CI 0.28-5.89). Total procedure time was shorter with CA alone (mean difference 48.45 min; 95% CI 23.06-74.62). Combined CA with LAAC for AF is associated with similar rates of arrhythmia-free survival, stroke, and major periprocedural complications when compared to CA alone. A combined strategy may be as safe and efficacious for patients at moderate to high risk for bleeding events to negate the need for chronic oral anticoagulation.

Effect Of Long-Term Use Of Antithrombotics And Statins On COVID-19 Mortality And Clinical Severity

Objective: Coronavirus Disease-2019 (COVID-19), has affected the whole world and is still an important disease with its mutations. In our study, we aimed to evaluate the effects of antithrombotic agents [acetylsalicylic acid (ASA), P2Y12 inhibitors, oral anticoagulants (OACs)] and statin treatments used before hospitalization on COVID-19 mortality and clinical severity. Methods: A retrospective study was conducted on 5577 patients hospitalized with positive swab tests or findings consistent with COVID-19 on computed tomography. The 6-month mortality, in-hospital mortality, need for intensive care and intubation, and recurrent hospitalization outcomes of patients receiving chronic ASA (n=1210), P2Y12 inhibitors (n=357), OACs (n=1192), and statin (n=607) treatment were evaluated. Results: The 6-month mortality rate was 13.5% (n=754), in-hospital mortality rate was 11.2% (n=627), the rate of admission to the intensive care unit was 16.1% (n=897), the need for intubation was 8.8% (n=493), and the rate of recurrent hospitalization was 10.4% (n=579). ASA and OACs reduced all outcomes. P2Y12 inhibitors provided benefit in other endpoints except intubation. Statins used before hospitalization did not provide a statistically significant decrease in 6-month mortality (p: 0.06), but were associated with a decrease in the rates of in-hospital mortality, need for intensive care, recurrent hospitalization, and intubation. Conclusion: We found that long-term ASA, P2Y12 inhibitors, OACs and statin treatments used before hospitalization in patients hospitalized with COVID-19, reduced COVID-19 mortality and clinical severity. We think that these treatments may be beneficial in selected patient groups where post-COVID effects are observed.

Persistent Gastrointestinal Bleeding after Aortic Valve Replacement in Heyde's Syndrome.

Heyde's syndrome (HS) represents an association between aortic stenosis and intestinal angiodysplasias, and it has been demonstrated that acquired von Willebrand disease plays a pivotal role in the pathophysiology of this syndrome. In patients with HS, von Willebrand factor deficiency represents an additional risk factor, further contributing to the risk of bleeding and anemia. We present the case of an 86-year-old patient diagnosed with HS and von Willebrand deficiency in 2018. Four years prior, the patient underwent surgical aortic valve replacement. Since then, she has been receiving chronic oral anticoagulation therapy with a vitamin K antagonist. The patient was admitted to the Internal Medicine Clinic due to semi-solid dark stools, diffuse abdominal pain, and asthenia. Upon examination, the patient presented with an altered general status and clinical signs suggestive of anemia. Laboratory findings revealed anemia with elevated INR and aPTT values. Colonic angiodysplasias were identified during a colonoscopy, although no sources of active bleeding were detected. On the 9th day of hospitalization, the patient experienced an episode of lower gastrointestinal bleeding. The pharmacological management was adjusted, and argon plasma coagulation was recommended. Following treatment of the angiodysplastic lesions, the patient's clinical evolution was favorable, with the correction of the anemia.

Knowledge, Attitude and Practice Toward Intracerebral Hemorrhage Prevention Among Patients Taking Oral Anticoagulants.

Intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH) affects up to 1% of chronic oral anticoagulation (OAC) users per year. This study explored the knowledge, attitude and practice (KAP) towards ICH prevention among patients taking OACs. This multicenter cross-sectional survey was conducted at 4 hospitals from February to May 2023, and a self-administered questionnaire was developed to assess KAP toward ICH prevention among patients taking OACs. Structural equation modeling was used to assess the relationship between KAP. A total of 536 valid questionnaires (67.25%) were analyzed, from 43.8% participants on Warfarin, 40.5% on Rivaroxaban and 15.7% on Dabigatran. The average knowledge, attitudes and practice scores were 9.22, 24.11, and 28.01 out of 16, 35 and 40, respectively. Participants who received Rivaroxaban had lower knowledge scores but higher attitude and practice store compared to those who received Warfarin or Dabigatran (all p < 0.001). According to Structure Equation Modeling, attitude had direct positive effect on practice (β = 0.694 [0.603-0.804], p = 0.012), while knowledge had direct negative effect on attitude (β = -2.077 [-2.507-1.651], p = 0.013), as well as negative effect on practice, both direct (β = -0.450[-0.689-2.03], p=0.012), and indirect (β = -1.441 [-1.928-1.192], p = 0.004). Patients taking OACs showed insufficient knowledge, negative attitude and proactive practice regarding ICH; practice scores were affected by age, type of anticoagulation medication, and attitude rather than knowledge.

Current Gaps in the Provision of Safe and Effective Anticoagulation in Atrial Fibrillation and the Potential for Factor XI-Directed Therapeutics.

The global prevalence of atrial fibrillation is rapidly increasing, in large part due to the aging of the population. Atrial fibrillation is known to increase the risk of thromboembolic stroke by 5 times, but it has been evident for decades that well-managed anticoagulation therapy can greatly attenuate this risk. Despite advances in pharmacology (such as the shift from vitamin K antagonists to direct oral anticoagulants) that have increased the safety and convenience of chronic oral anticoagulation in atrial fibrillation, a preponderance of recent observational data indicates that protection from stroke is poorly achieved on a population basis. This outcomes deficit is multifactorial in origin, stemming from a combination of underprescribing of anticoagulants (often as a result of bleeding concerns by prescribers), limitations of the drugs themselves (drug-drug interactions, bioaccumulation in renal insufficiency, short half-lives that result in lapses in therapeutic effect, etc), and suboptimal patient adherence that results from lack of understanding/education, polypharmacy, fear of bleeding, forgetfulness, and socioeconomic barriers, among other obstacles. Often this adherence is not reported to treating clinicians, further subverting efforts to optimize care. A multidisciplinary, interprofessional panel of clinicians met during the 2023 International Society of Thrombosis and Haemostasis Congress to discuss these gaps in therapy, how they can be more readily recognized, and the potential for factor XI-directed anticoagulants to improve the safety and efficacy of stroke prevention. A full appreciation of this potential requires a reevaluation of traditional teaching about the "coagulation cascade" and decoupling the processes that result in (physiologic) hemostasis and (pathologic) thrombosis. The panel discussion is summarized and presented here.

Chronic Anticoagulation in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation and COVID-19: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is associated with hypercoagulability. It remains uncertain whether ongoing anticoagulation for atrial fibrillation (AF) in patients who later contract COVID-19 improves clinical outcomes. To compare chronic oral anticoagulation with no previous anticoagulation in patients with AF who contracted a COVID-19 infection concerning the outcomes of all-cause mortality, COVID-19 mortality, intensive care unit (ICU) admission, and hospitalization. We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library for eligible studies from inception to December 2022. We included studies comparing COVID-19 outcomes in patients with versus without prior chronic anticoagulation for AF. Risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were pooled with a random-effects model. The level of significance was set at p < 0.05. Quality assessment and risk of bias were performed according to Cochrane recommendations. Ten studies comprising 1,177,858 patients with COVID-19 and AF were identified, of whom 893,772 (75.9%) were on prior chronic anticoagulation for AF. In patients with COVID-19, being on chronic anticoagulation for AF significantly reduced all-cause mortality (RR 0.75; 95% CI 0.57 to 0.99; p = 0.048; I2 = 89%) and COVID-19-related mortality (RR 0.76; 95% CI 0.72 to 0.79; p < 0.001; I2 = 0%) when compared with no prior anticoagulation. In contrast, there was no difference between groups regarding hospitalization (RR 1.08; 95% CI 0.82 to 1.41; p = 0.587; I2 = 95%) or ICU admission (RR 0.86; 95% CI 0.68 to 1.09; p = 0.216; I2 = 69%). In this meta-analysis, chronic anticoagulation for patients with AF who contracted COVID-19 was associated with significantly lower rates of all-cause mortality and COVID-19-related mortality as compared with no previous anticoagulation.

Anticoagulação Crônica em Pacientes com Fibrilação Atrial e COVID-19: Uma Revisão Sistemática e Metanálise

Abstract Background: Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is associated with hypercoagulability. It remains uncertain whether ongoing anticoagulation for atrial fibrillation (AF) in patients who later contract COVID-19 improves clinical outcomes. Objectives: To compare chronic oral anticoagulation with no previous anticoagulation in patients with AF who contracted a COVID-19 infection concerning the outcomes of all-cause mortality, COVID-19 mortality, intensive care unit (ICU) admission, and hospitalization. Methods: We systematically searched PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library for eligible studies from inception to December 2022. We included studies comparing COVID-19 outcomes in patients with versus without prior chronic anticoagulation for AF. Risk ratios (RR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI) were pooled with a random-effects model. The level of significance was set at p &lt; 0.05. Quality assessment and risk of bias were performed according to Cochrane recommendations. Results: Ten studies comprising 1,177,858 patients with COVID-19 and AF were identified, of whom 893,772 (75.9%) were on prior chronic anticoagulation for AF. In patients with COVID-19, being on chronic anticoagulation for AF significantly reduced all-cause mortality (RR 0.75; 95% CI 0.57 to 0.99; p = 0.048; I2 = 89%) and COVID-19-related mortality (RR 0.76; 95% CI 0.72 to 0.79; p &lt; 0.001; I2 = 0%) when compared with no prior anticoagulation. In contrast, there was no difference between groups regarding hospitalization (RR 1.08; 95% CI 0.82 to 1.41; p = 0.587; I2 = 95%) or ICU admission (RR 0.86; 95% CI 0.68 to 1.09; p = 0.216; I2 = 69%). Conclusions: In this meta-analysis, chronic anticoagulation for patients with AF who contracted COVID-19 was associated with significantly lower rates of all-cause mortality and COVID-19-related mortality as compared with no previous anticoagulation.

Is It Safe to Resume Direct Oral Anticoagulants upon Discharge after Hip Fracture Surgery? A Retrospective Study.

This study aimed to examine the incidence rate of early reoperations following hip fracture surgery and determine the safety of resuming direct oral anticoagulants. Many orthopedic surgeons are reluctant to resume chronic anticoagulation therapy for patients after surgical intervention for hip fractures. One of the main reasons is the potential for reoperation in the case of surgical complications. We conducted a retrospective cohort study at an Academic Level I trauma center, reviewing the records of 425 geriatric patients (age > 60) who underwent hip fracture surgery between 2018 and 2020, including a subgroup treated with direct oral anticoagulants prior to hospitalization. The study assessed the incidence rate of complications requiring early reoperation. Out of the 425 patients, only nine (2%) required reoperation within a month after discharge, with two (0.5%) on chronic anticoagulation therapy. None of the reoperations were urgent, and all were performed at least 24 h after re-admission. The findings revealed a very low incidence rate of reoperations in patients who underwent hip fracture surgery, with no reoperations performed within 24 h of re-admission. Consequently, we believe that resuming chronic direct oral anticoagulants is a safe and effective approach when discharging patients after hip fracture surgery.

DOACs vs Vitamin K Antagonists During Cardiac Rhythm Device Surgery: A Multicenter Propensity-Matched Study

BackgroundThere is a paucity of data comparing vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) to direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) at the time of cardiac implantable electronic device (CIED) surgery. Furthermore, the best management of DOACs (interruption vs continuation) is yet to be determined. ObjectivesThis study aimed to compare the incidence of device-related bleeds and thrombotic events based on anticoagulant type (DOAC vs VKA) and regimen (interrupted vs uninterrupted). MethodsThis was an observational multicenter study. We included patients on chronic oral anticoagulation undergoing CIED surgery. Patients were matched using propensity scoring. ResultsWe included 1,975 patients (age 73.8 ± 12.4 years). Among 1,326 patients on DOAC, this was interrupted presurgery in 78.2% (n = 1,039) and continued in 21.8% (n = 287). There were 649 patients on continued VKA. The matched population included 861 patients. The rate of any major bleeding was higher with continued DOAC (5.2%) compared to interrupted DOAC (1.7%) and continued VKA (2.1%) (P = 0.03). The rate of perioperative thromboembolism was 1.4% with interrupted DOAC, whereas no thromboembolic events occurred with DOAC or VKA continuation (P = 0.04). The use of dual antiplatelet therapy, DOAC continuation, and male sex were independent predictors of major bleeding on a multivariable analysis. ConclusionsIn this large real-world cohort, a continued DOAC strategy was associated with a higher bleeding risk compared to DOAC interruption or VKA continuation in patients undergoing CIED surgery. However, DOAC interruption was associated with increased thromboembolic risk. Concomitant dual antiplatelet therapy should be avoided whenever clinically possible. A bespoke approach is necessary, with a strategy of minimal DOAC interruption likely to represent the best compromise.

Bioprosthetic leaflet thrombosis and reduced leaflet motion after transcatheter aortic valve replacement: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BackgroundLeaflet thrombosis and reduced leaflet motion have become a concern with the expanding use of transcatheter aortic valve replacement in lower-risk patients. AimsTo assess the proportions, predictors and clinical impact of leaflet thrombosis and reduced leaflet motion after transcatheter aortic valve replacement. MethodsWe performed a meta-analysis of studies assessing the proportions of and/or clinical outcomes according to the presence of leaflet thrombosis after transcatheter aortic valve replacement identified with computed tomography and/or echocardiography. ResultsFifty-three studies, representing 25,258 patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve replacement, were considered. The proportion of leaflet thrombosis was 5.2% overall, and was higher in computed tomography versus echocardiography (16.4% vs. 1.1%, respectively); reduced leaflet motion was identified in 11% of patients with four-dimensional computed tomography. Intra-annular bioprostheses were associated with a higher proportion of leaflet thrombosis, whereas chronic oral anticoagulation was protective for leaflet thrombosis in both computed tomography and echocardiographic studies (9.7% vs. 17.5%; relative risk [RR]: 0.51, 95% confidence interval [95% CI]: 0.37–0.71 and 0.9% vs. 2.7%; RR: 0.22, 95% CI: 0.06–0.79, respectively) and for reduced leaflet motion (2.5% vs. 12.4%; RR: 0.32, 95% CI: 0.13–0.76). Leaflet thrombosis was not associated with an increased risk of death, but with a higher risk of stroke in computed tomography studies (2.8% vs. 2.4%; RR: 1.63, 95% CI: 1.05–2.55), a difference more pronounced when considering reduced leaflet motion (3.5% vs. 1.7%; RR: 2.39, 95% CI: 0.63–8.34). ConclusionsThe proportion of leaflet thrombosis is highly variable according to the screening approach, the type of valve and the use of oral anticoagulation. The occurrence of cerebral events is increased when leaflet thrombosis and/or reduced leaflet motion are diagnosed, but leaflet thrombosis has no impact on survival.

Does platelet reactivity depend on chronic oral anticoagulation choice in patients undergoing pulmonary vein isolation?

Does platelet reactivity depend on chronic oral anticoagulation choice in patients undergoing pulmonary vein isolation?

Artificial intelligence in detecting left atrial appendage thrombus by transthoracic echocardiography and clinical features: the Left Atrial Thrombus on Transoesophageal Echocardiography (LATTEE) registry.

Transoesophageal echocardiography (TOE) is often performed before catheter ablation or cardioversion to rule out the presence of left atrial appendage thrombus (LAT) in patients on chronic oral anticoagulation (OAC), despite associated discomfort. A machine learning model [LAT-artificial intelligence (AI)] was developed to predict the presence of LAT based on clinical and transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) features. Data from a 13-site prospective registry of patients who underwent TOE before cardioversion or catheter ablation were used. LAT-AI was trained to predict LAT using data from 12 sites (n = 2827) and tested externally in patients on chronic OAC from two sites (n = 1284). Areas under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of LAT-AI were compared with that of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) and CHA2DS2-VASc score. A decision threshold allowing for a 99% negative predictive value was defined in the development cohort. A protocol where TOE in patients on chronic OAC is performed depending on the LAT-AI score was validated in the external cohort. In the external testing cohort, LAT was found in 5.5% of patients. LAT-AI achieved an AUC of 0.85 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.82-0.89], outperforming LVEF (0.81, 95% CI 0.76-0.86, P < .0001) and CHA2DS2-VASc score (0.69, 95% CI: 0.63-0.7, P < .0001) in the entire external cohort. Based on the proposed protocol, 40% of patients on chronic OAC from the external cohort would safely avoid TOE. LAT-AI allows accurate prediction of LAT. A LAT-AI-based protocol could be used to guide the decision to perform TOE despite chronic OAC.

Transcatheter Left Atrial Appendage Closure.

Atrial fibrillation is the most common arrhythmia worldwide, placing a large population at risk for potentially disabling ischemic strokes, yet an estimated 50% of eligible patients cannot tolerate or are contraindicated to receive oral anticoagulation. Within the last 15 years, transcatheter options for left atrial appendage closure (LAAC) have provided a valuable alternative to chronic oral anticoagulation for reducing risk of stroke and systemic embolism in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. With newer generation devices such as Watchman FLX and Amulet gaining approval from the US Food and Drug Administration in recent years, several large clinical trials have demonstrated the safety and efficacy of transcatheter LAAC in a population intolerant to systemic anticoagulation. In this contemporary review, we discuss the indications for transcatheter LAAC and the evidence evaluating the use of various device therapies currently available or in development. We also examine current unmet challenges in intraprocedural imaging and controversies in postimplantation antithrombotic regimens. Several ongoing seminal trials are hoping to clarify the role of transcatheter LAAC as a safe, first-line option for all patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation.

Antithrombotic Management After Left Atrial Appendage Closure: Current Evidence and Future Perspectives.

Left atrial appendage closure is an alternative to chronic oral anticoagulation to prevent embolic events related to nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. After device implantation, antithrombotic treatment is prescribed to prevent device-related thrombosis, a dreadful complication associated with an increased risk of ischemic events. However, the optimal antithrombotic treatment after left atrial appendage closure, effective on both device-related thrombus prevention and bleeding risk mitigation, remains to be determined. In more than 10 years experience with left atrial appendage closure, a wide range of antithrombotic treatments have been used, mostly in observational studies. In this review, we analyzed the body of evidence for each antithrombotic regimen after left atrial appendage closure to provide tools to guide the physician choice and describe future perspectives in the field.

Treatment of Persistent Left Atrial Appendage Thrombus in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation on Adequate Oral Anticoagulation: Pathways of Care for All-comers and Heart Failure Patients.

In patients with AF, the presence of left atrial/left atrial appendage (LA/LAA) thrombus is related to an increased risk of thromboembolic events. Anticoagulation therapy, either with vitamin K antagonists or novel oral anticoagulants (NOACs) is therefore mandatory in AF with LA/LAA thrombus in order to lower the risk of stroke or other systemic embolic events. Despite the efficacy of these treatments, some patients will have persistent LAA thrombus remaining or may have contraindications to oral anticoagulation. Currently, little is known about the occurrence, risk factors and resolution rate of LA/LAA thrombus in patients who are already under optimal chronic oral anticoagulation, including vitamin K antagonists or NOACs. The common action in clinical practice in this scenario is switching from one to another anticoagulant drug exhibiting a different mechanism of action. Repeated cardiac imaging is then advised within several weeks to visually verify thrombus dissolution. Finally, there is a substantial scarcity of data on the role and optimal use of NOACs after LAA occlusion. The aim of this review is to critically evaluate data and provide up-to-date information on the best antithrombotic strategies in this challenging clinical scenario.

Antithrombotic therapy after TAVI: Better alone than with a bad company.

Key Points In transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) subset, previous randomized controlled trials reported increased mortality when anticoagulant therapy was used in subjects without a previous oral anticoagulation (OAC) indication. The current meta‐analysis confirms the worse clinical outcomes in anticoagulated patients as compared to subjects treated with antiplatelet, tough less subclinical valve thrombosis was found in the OAC group. At present, antiplatelet therapy (especially SAPT) seems the most reasonable approach in TAVI patients without indications for chronic OAC.

Antithrombotic therapy and cardiovascular outcomes after transcatheter aortic valve implantation in patients without indications for chronic oral anticoagulation: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

As the antithrombotic regimen that may best prevent ischaemic complications along with the lowest bleeding risk offset following transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) remains unclear, we aimed to compare the safety and efficacy of antithrombotic regimens in patients without having an indication for chronic oral anticoagulation. We conducted a PROSPERO-registered (CRD42021247924) systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials evaluating post-TAVI antithrombotic regimens up to April 2022. We estimated the relative risk (RR) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) using a random-effects model in a frequentist pairwise and network metanalytic approach. We included seven studies comprising 4006 patients with a mean weighted follow-up of 12.9 months. Risk of all-cause death was significantly reduced with dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) compared with low-dose rivaroxaban+3-month single antiplatelet therapy (SAPT) (RR 0.60, 95% CI 0.41-0.88), while no significant reduction was observed with SAPT vs. DAPT (RR 1.02, 95% CI 0.67-1.58) and SAPT and DAPT compared with apixaban or edoxaban (RR 0.60, 95% CI 0.32-1.14 and RR 0.59, 95% CI 0.34-1.02, respectively). SAPT was associated with a significant reduction of life-threatening, disabling, or major bleeding compared with DAPT (RR 0.45, 95% CI 0.29-0.70), apixaban or edoxaban alone (RR 0.45, 95% CI 0.25-0.79), and low-dose rivaroxaban+3-month SAPT (RR 0.30, 95% CI 0.16-0.57). There were no differences between the various regimens with respect to myocardial infarction, stroke, or systemic embolism. Following TAVI in patients without an indication for chronic oral anticoagulant, SAPT more than halved the risk of bleeding compared with DAPT and direct oral anticoagulant-based regimens without significant ischaemic offset.

Impact of drug interactions with direct oral anticoagulants on mortality in elderly with atrial fibrillation during the COVID-19 pandemic

ObjectiveTo evaluate the effect of drug interactions with chronic direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) on mortality in older atrial fibrillation (AF) patients during the Coronavirus disease 2019(COVID-19) pandemic. MethodsWe followed a total of 601 elderly patients (65 years of age) from the NOEL-Drug Registry cohort who were referred to a tertiary outpatient clinic between 9 March 2020 and 1 March 2021. We recorded clinical characteristics and medications for the last 3 months. In addition, all drug interactions were identified using Lexicomp®. Finally, we recorded retrospectively all death events, COVID-19 diagnosis, and relevant deaths from the database at the end of the study. According to logistic regression, we performed propensity score (PS) matching to reduce potential bias. Factors associated with total mortality in the 12 months were analyzed using multivariable Cox proportion hazard analysis. ResultsThe mean age [standard deviation (SD)] was 74.5 (±6.9), and the male/female ratio was 337/264. The prevalence of total mortality was 16.9% (n=102). A total of 4472 drugs were analyzed for DOAC interaction. 81.8% of older AF patients were not at risk in terms of potential interaction. In the Cox proportional hazard model after PS-matching, previous DOAC use with class X interaction was associated with significantly higher mortality risk (adjusted hazard ratio: 2.745, 95% confidence interval: 1.465–5.172, p=0.004). ConclusionsOur study showed that while most co-medications do not have significant interactions with DOACs, few serious drug interactions contribute to mortality in elderly patients with AF during the pandemic.