Chronic Non-steroidal Anti-inflammatory Drugs Users Research Articles

Rebamipide as a Potential Alternative Gastroprotective Agent to Proton Pump Inhibitor in Elderly Chronic Nonsteroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drug Users without Risk Factors.

PurposeThe use of proton pump inhibitors (PPI) is recommended to prevent nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID)-induced gastrointestinal (GI) complications. The incidence of several adverse effects during the long-term use of PPI prompts the search for other alternatives. Limited studies have evaluated the efficacy of rebamipide, a widely used mucoprotective drug, as a gastroprotective agent (GPA) compared to PPI, focusing on the elderly chronic NSAID users, nor with GI risk stratification. We aimed to determine the population who would get benefit from the use of rebamipide as an alternative to PPI to prevent traditional nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (tNSAID)-associated GI complications.Patients and MethodsWe identified 41,889 and 35,708 elderly chronic tNSAID users with PPI and rebamipide co-therapy, respectively, from the national claims database. Outcome was defined as hospitalization or emergency department visits due to serious GI complications. Propensity score-matched cohorts were constructed and compared within risk strata.ResultsIn high and moderate risk groups with two risk factors, rebamipide showed a higher risk of serious GI complication compared to PPI (aHR 2.63, 95% CI 1.24–5.59 and aHR 2.42, 95% CI 1.21–4.83, respectively). However, in elderly patients without risk factors, there was no significant difference in the risk of serious GI complications between PPI and rebamipide (aHR 0.69, 95% CI 0.27–1.76).ConclusionThis study suggested that rebamipide can be considered as an alternative to PPI in elderly chronic tNSAID users without risk factors. However, elderly patients with other risk factors should use PPI rather than rebamipide. Therefore, the presence of GI risk factors needs to be evaluated in elderly chronic tNSAID users to prescribe the most suitable GPA in clinical practice.

Helicobacter pylori Eradication in Drug-related Peptic Ulcer.

Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and aspirin are the most frequently prescribed drugs worldwide, and their long-term use often leads to peptic ulcers (PUs) along with serious complications, such as bleeding and perforation. Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection is a significant risk factor for developing NSAID-related PU and ulcer bleeding during long-term aspirin use. In a revised version of the Clinical Guidelines for Drug-induced Peptic Ulcer, two statements regarding H. pylori eradication are recommended. 1) Patients scheduled for long-term NSAID therapy should be tested and treated for H. pylori infection to prevent PU and its complications. 2) Patients with a history of PU receiving long-term low-dose aspirin (LDA) therapy should undergo treatment for H. pylori infection to prevent PU and its complications. On the other hand, unlike NSAID-naïve patients, the preventive effects of H. pylori eradication in chronic NSAID users are unclear. In addition, anti-ulcer drugs, such as proton pump inhibitors, may be necessary for maintenance therapy after H. pylori eradication in a subset of long-term LDA users, particularly if the patients are taking concomitant antiplatelet agents or anticoagulants.

Underutilization of gastrointestinal prophylaxis in high-risk chronic nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug users in Korea.

Background The increasing use of antithrombotic therapies in older patients has led to an increased risk of gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding in chronic nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) users. Therefore, there is a pressing need for GI prophylaxis in these high-risk patients. Objective To analyze prescribing patterns and factors associated with the use of gastroprotective agents (GPAs) among high-risk, chronic NSAID users. Setting National claims database including 20% of the total Korean population aged ≥ 65years. Method In this cross-sectional study, we identified older adults prescribed traditional NSAIDs for > 90days and classified them into high- and ultra-high-risk groups if they had one or two or more GI risk factors, respectively. Proton pump inhibitors or misoprostol prescribed for more than 80% of traditional NSAID treatment days was regarded as appropriate GI prophylaxis. Main outcome measure Prevalence and associated factors with appropriate GI prophylaxis. Results Among 69,992 chronic traditional NSAID users, 38.8% and 9.4% belonged to the high and ultra-high-risk groups; 13.2% and 19.9% received appropriate GI prophylaxis, respectively. The most frequently used GPA was histamine H2 antagonists. Multiple NSAID use, concomitant antiplatelets and anticoagulants, and prior GI ulcer history increased the likelihood of receiving appropriate GI prophylaxis. Advanced age (≥ 85years), indications other than arthritis, and neurology specialists negatively affected appropriate GI prophylaxis use. Conclusion Approximately one in five chronic NSAID users, considered ultra-high risk, are prescribed appropriate GI prophylaxis in Korea. Advanced age, indications, and specialties of the prescriber all need to be considered when selecting target populations for interventions.

Non-Steroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs (NSAIDs): Usage and co-prescription with other potentially interacting drugs in elderly: A cross-sectional study.

Globally, usage of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) in elderly with chronic pain has been reported as frequent. Though NSAIDs are fundamental in maintaining their quality of life, the risk of polypharmacy, drug interactions and adverse effects is of paramount importance as the elderly usually require multiple medications for their co-morbidities. If prescriptions are not appropriately monitored and managed, they are likely to expose patients to serious drug interactions and potentially fatal adverse effects. This study was conducted to assess the appropriateness of NSAIDs use and determine the risk of NSAIDs related potential interactions in elderly. An analytical cross-sectional study was conducted among elderly out-patients (aged 60 and above) who visited three hospitals in Asmara, Eritrea, between August 22 and September 29, 2018. A stratified random sampling design was employed and data was collected using an interview-based questionnaire and by abstracting information from patients' prescriptions and medical cards. Descriptive and analytical statistics including chi-square test and logistic regression were employed using IBM SPSS (version 22). A total of 285 respondents were enrolled in the study with similar male to female ratio. One in four of all respondents were chronic NSAIDs users and NSAIDs risk practice was reported in 24%. Using chronic NSAIDs without prophylactic gastro-protective agents, self-medication, polypharmacy and drug-drug interactions were the main problems identified. A total of 322 potential interactions in 205 patients were identified and of which, 97.2% were classified as moderate, 0.6% severe and the rest were mild. Those who involved in self-medication were more likely to be exposed to drug interactions. Diabetes (AOR = 2.39, 95% CI: 1.14, 5.02) and hypertension (AOR = 9.06, 95% CI: 4.00, 20.51) were associated with chronic NSAIDs use and incidence of potential drug interactions (AOR = 3.5, 95%CI: 1.68, 4.3; AOR = 2.81, 95%CI: 1.61, 4.9 respectively), while diabetes AOR = 4.5, 95% CI: 2.43, 8.35) and cardiac problems (AOR = 4.29, 95% CI: 1.17, 15.73) were more likely to be associated with incidence of polypharmacy. In conclusion, chronic use of NSAIDs without gastro-protective agents and therapeutic duplication of NSAIDs were commonly which requires attention from programmers, health facility managers and healthcare professionals to safeguard elderlies from preventable harm.

Pharmacist-Led Provider Education on Inappropriate NSAID Prescribing Rates.

Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are one of the most commonly used pain medications among US adults with about 70 million people regularly taking NSAIDs annually. Despite clear recommendations from current clinical practice guidelines and recent supporting literature, NSAIDs are continually prescribed inappropriately in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD), hypertension (HTN), and heart failure (HF). The purpose of this project was to determine the impact of direct pharmacist-led education to providers on rates of inappropriate prescribing of NSAIDs in high-risk populations in a family medicine setting. This study included all adult (aged 18 years or older) patient charts with NSAIDs prescribed, refilled, or recorded within the specified time periods. We defined inappropriate orders as oral and of chronic duration (at least 90 days) with at least one high-risk International Classification of Diseases-10 chart diagnosis (HTN, HF, CKD). This was a single-center, retrospective chart review of prescribing rates during a 3-month period before and after provider education delivered by a pharmacist. We identified a total of 325 charts from preintervention and 489 charts postintervention that met inclusion criteria. Of those, the charts with orders categorized as inappropriate were 90 versus 44, respectively. The rate of inappropriate prescribing of NSAIDs significantly decreased from 27.7% to 9.0% (P<.0001) postintervention. Among chronic NSAID users, both serum creatinine and systolic blood pressure significantly increased following NSAID initiation. A single pharmacist-led education intervention to primary care providers on inappropriate NSAID use in high-risk patient populations had a significant impact on minimizing inappropriate NSAID prescribing patterns within a family medicine outpatient office.

A cluster randomized trial to measure the impact on nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug and proton pump inhibitor prescribing in Italy of distributing cost-free paracetamol to osteoarthritic patients

BackgroundParacetamol is recommended as first-line treatment for pain control in osteoarthritis because it has fewer side effects than do other therapeutic options, including nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). Prescribing proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) as gastric bleeding prophylaxis in chronic NSAID users is also common, although not recommended. In Italy, paracetamol is not reimbursed by the National Health System. The aim of this trial was to test whether the availability to osteoarthritis patients of free paracetamol would decrease their use of NSAIDs and, as a secondary objective, whether opioid and PPI consumption would also decrease.MethodsEight general practitioners (GPs) (59 patients) were randomized to usual care and 8 (58 patients) to the experimental arm, where prescribed paracetamol was directly distributed for free by the local hospital. After 6 months, paracetamol was also available for free in the control arm.The main outcome was the pre/post difference in average NSAID and PPI consumption. Differences between experimental and control arms in pre/post differences are reported, as registered by the drug prescription information system.ResultsAverage NSAID consumption decreased non-significantly, from 6.79 to 2.16 defined daily dose (DDD) in the experimental arm and from 3.19 to 2.97 DDD in the control group (p = 0.067). No changes were observed for PPIs (from 11.27 to 14.65 DDD and from 9.74 to 12.58 DDD in experimental and control arms, respectively, p = 0.788) or opioids (from 1.61 to 1.14 DDD and from 1.41 to 1.56 DDD in experimental and control arms, respectively, p = 0.419). When the intervention was extended to the control arm, no decrease in NSAID consumption was observed (from 2.46 to 2.43 DDD, p = 0.521).ConclusionsRemoving small economic barriers had small or no effect on the appropriateness of opioid or PPI prescribing to patients with osteoarthritis; a reduction in NSAID consumption cannot be ruled out.Trial registration numberNCT02691754 (Approved February 24, 2016).

Alleviating Promotion of Inflammation and Cancer Induced by Nonsteroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs.

Clinical Relevance Nonsteroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs (NSAIDs) including aspirin are of intensive use nowadays. These drugs exert their activity via the metabolism of arachidonic acid (AA) by cyclooxygenase inhibition. Though beneficial for health in some instances, both unspecific and specific cyclooxygenase inhibitor activity interfere with AA metabolism producing also proinflammatory lipids that may promote cancer. Materials and Methods This review is based on available literature on clinical uses, biochemical investigations, molecular medicine, pharmacology, toxicity, and epidemiology-clinical studies on NSAIDs and other drugs that may be used accordingly, which was collected from electronic (SciFinder, Medline, Science Direct, and ACS among others) and library searches of books and journals. Results Relevant literature supports the notion that NDSAID use may also promote proinflammatory biochemical events that are also related to precancerous predisposition. Several agents are proposed that may be employed in immediate future to supplement and optimize treatment with NSAIDs. In this way serious side effects arising from promotion of inflammation and cancer, especially in chronic NSAID users and high risk groups of patients, could be avoided.

Are the clinical guideline recommendations on gastroprotection being followed? A review in patients taking nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs

Introduction and aimsThe chronic use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) can cause complications in the gastrointestinal tract. The use of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) is recommended in high-risk patients to prevent them. ObjectiveThe aim of this article was to evaluate the gastroprotection measures taken in persons with chronic NSAID use. Materials and methodsA descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted. The clinical records were reviewed of patients seen as outpatients at the Rheumatology Department over a 4-month period, choosing those with chronic NSAID use, and intentionally looking for gastroprotection measures according to the recommendations published by the American College of Gastroenterology. ResultsA total of 417 patients (347 women; mean age: 48.12±14.2 years) were included. The most frequent diagnosis was rheumatoid arthritis (65%). Nine patients (2.1%) had a history of peptic ulcer, 48 (11.5%) patients were 65 years of age or older, 26 (6.2%) patients took NSAIDs and aspirin, and 130 (31.2%) took NSAIDs with steroids. Tests for Helicobacter pylori infection were done in just 53 cases, and there were positive results in only 9 (16%). Some risk for gastrointestinal toxicity was established in 211 cases and only 65 (30.8%) received gastroprotection. In contrast, 31 (15%) patients received gastroprotection when there was no indication for it. ConclusionProphylaxis with PPIs in chronic NSAID users was inadequately employed. It was not prescribed in the majority of patients (69.2%) and it was used with no justification in others (15%).

Are the clinical guideline recommendations on gastroprotection being followed? A review in patients taking nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs.

The chronic use of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) can cause complications in the gastrointestinal tract. The use of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) is recommended in high-risk patients to prevent them. The aim of this article was to evaluate the gastroprotection measures taken in persons with chronic NSAID use. A descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted. The clinical records were reviewed of patients seen as outpatients at the Rheumatology Department over a 4-month period, choosing those with chronic NSAID use, and intentionally looking for gastroprotection measures according to the recommendations published by the American College of Gastroenterology. A total of 417 patients (347 women; mean age: 48.12±14.2 years) were included. The most frequent diagnosis was rheumatoid arthritis (65%). Nine patients (2.1%) had a history of peptic ulcer, 48 (11.5%) patients were 65 years of age or older, 26 (6.2%) patients took NSAIDs and aspirin, and 130 (31.2%) took NSAIDs with steroids. Tests for Helicobacter pylori infection were done in just 53 cases, and there were positive results in only 9 (16%). Some risk for gastrointestinal toxicity was established in 211 cases and only 65 (30.8%) received gastroprotection. In contrast, 31 (15%) patients received gastroprotection when there was no indication for it. Prophylaxis with PPIs in chronic NSAID users was inadequately employed. It was not prescribed in the majority of patients (69.2%) and it was used with no justification in others (15%).

Solumatrix meloxicam safety in older patients with osteoarthritis pain

Solumatrix meloxicam safety in older patients with osteoarthritis pain

Does Helicobacter pylori Exacerbate Gastric Mucosal Injury in Users of Nonsteroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs? A Multicenter, Retrospective, Case-Control Study.

Background/AimsThe interaction between nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and Helicobacter pylori remains controversial. We retrospectively investigated whether H. pylori infection exacerbates severe gastric mucosal injury among chronic NSAID users.MethodsFrom January 2010 to December 2013, a total of 245 long-term NSAID (including low-dose aspirin) users who had undergone an esophagogastroduodenoscopy and had been evaluated for H. pylori infection were enrolled at Okayama University Hospital and Tsuyama Chuo Hospital. The degree of gastric mucosal injury was assessed according to the modified Lanza score (MLS). Severe gastric mucosal injury was defined as an MLS ≥4. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses were performed.ResultsIn the univariate analysis, age ≥75 years (odds ratio [OR], 2.4; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.3 to 4.2), H. pylori-positivity (OR, 2.0; 95% CI, 1.2 to 3.5), and the concomitant use of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) (OR, 0.48; 95% CI, 0.26 to 0.86) were significantly associated with severe gastric mucosal injury. The multivariate analysis was adjusted by age and sex and demonstrated that H. pylori-positivity (OR, 1.8; 95% CI, 1.0 to 3.3) and the concomitant use of PPIs (OR, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.28 to 0.99) significantly contributed to severe gastric mucosal injury.ConclusionsH. pylori infection exacerbates severe gastric mucosal injury among chronic NSAID users.

Efficacy and safety of low-dose SoluMatrix meloxicam in the treatment of osteoarthritis pain: a 12-week, phase 3 study

Objective:Nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) such as meloxicam are commonly used to treat osteoarthritis (OA) but are associated with potentially serious dose-related adverse events (AEs). SoluMatrix meloxicam has been developed with the goal of enabling effective treatment at low doses. This phase 3 study evaluated the efficacy and safety of low-dose SoluMatrix meloxicam capsules 5 mg and 10 mg administered once daily for 12 weeks in patients with OA-related pain.Research design and methods:This randomized, double-blind study enrolled patients ≥40 years of age with confirmed hip or knee OA (Kellgren–Lawrence grade II–III) who were chronic users of NSAIDs and/or acetaminophen for OA pain and had Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) pain subscale mean scores ≥40 mm. Eligible patients experienced an OA pain flare (defined as a ≥15 mm increase in the WOMAC pain subscale score) following discontinuation of NSAIDs/acetaminophen. Patients were randomized to receive once-daily SoluMatrix meloxicam 5 mg or 10 mg, or placebo for 12 weeks.ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01787188.Main outcome measures:The primary outcome measure was the mean change from baseline in WOMAC pain subscale score at week 12.Results:Low-dose SoluMatrix meloxicam 5 mg (−36.52 [2.49]; P = 0.0005) and 10 mg (−34.41 [2.68]; P = 0.0059) once-daily treatment significantly reduced the mean (standard error) WOMAC pain subscale score from baseline at week 12 compared with placebo (−25.68 [2.64]). Patients treated with SoluMatrix meloxicam 5 mg or 10 mg reported significantly greater improvements in total WOMAC score and in WOMAC stiffness and function subscale scores at 12 weeks compared with placebo. The most common AEs in the combined low-dose SoluMatrix meloxicam group were headache, diarrhea, nausea, osteoarthritis, and urinary tract infection.Conclusions:Low-dose SoluMatrix meloxicam may have a potential role as a new therapeutic option for the management of OA-related pain.

Risk factors for small bowel bleeding in chronic nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug users.

The incidence of nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs)-induced enteropathy is currently increasing. However, the predictors of small bowel bleeding (SBB) associated with NSAIDs are unknown. This study aimed to assess the risk factors of SBB in chronic NSAIDs users. We retrospectively compared the medical records of 147 patients receiving NSAIDs in a tertiary-care setting (31 with SBB and 116 without previous bleeding events) and analyzed the predictors of SBB. In total, 31 patients underwent video capsule endoscopy to detect SBB, 74.2% of whom showed the evidence of SBB. Non-invasive treatment was performed in 90.3% of the patients. Multivariate logistic regression analysis revealed that the presence of coronary artery disease [adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 12.43, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.19-130.34, P = 0.04], use of thienopyridine (aOR 16.93, 95% CI 3.78-75.72, P < 0.001) and prior use of rebamipide (aOR 0.31, 95% CI 0.12-0.82, P = 0.02) were independently associated with SBB in NSAIDs users. Coronary artery disease and co-use of thienopyridine were associated with SBB in NSAIDs users. The patients with coronary artery disease co-using thienopyridine need to be monitored for the occurrence of SBB when they were prescribed with NSAIDs.

Telomere length in non-neoplastic gastric mucosa and its relationship to H. pylori infection, degree of gastritis, and NSAID use.

Telomere shortening occurs with human aging in many organs and tissues and is accelerated by rapid cell turnover and oxidative injury. We measured average telomere length using quantitative real-time PCR in non-neoplastic gastric mucosa and assessed its relationship to H. pylori-related gastritis, DNA methylation, ulcer disease, and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) usage. Gastric biopsies were obtained from 151 cancer-free subjects including 49 chronic NSAID users and 102 nonusers. Relative telomere length in genomic DNA was measured by real-time PCR. H. pylori infection status, histological severity of gastritis, and serum pepsinogens (PGs) were also investigated. E-cadherin (CDH1) methylation status was determined by methylation-specific PCR (MSP). Average relative telomere length of H. pylori-infected subjects was significantly shortened when compared to H. pylori-negative subjects (p = 0.002) and was closely associated with all histological parameter of gastritis (all p values <0.01) and CDH1 methylation (p = 0.0002). In H. pylori-negative subjects, NSAID users presented significantly shorter telomere length than nonusers (p = 0.028). Shorter telomere length was observed in duodenal and gastric ulcer patients compared with non-ulcer subjects among NSAID users. Telomere shortening is closely associated with severity of H. pylori-induced gastritis and CDH1 methylation status. Also, telomere shortening is accelerated by NSAID usage especially in H. pylori-negative subjects.

Non steroidal anti-inflammatory drug induced damage on lower gastro-intestinal tract: is there an involvement of microbiota?

Intestinal microbiota is composed by a community of microorganisms, which regulate intestinal functions and affect the global health. It is presumable that the well-known intestinal damages induced by Non Steroidal Antiinflammatory Drugs (NSAIDs) mirror on the homeostasis of microbiota, as confirmed by studies investigating this aspect. This review reports the evolving knowledge in this field taking into account both intestinal damage and microbiota involvement. In addition, we analyze a recent study reporting how NSAIDs change intestinal bacterial composition and, on this basis, hypothesize further possible interactions. Indeed, NSAIDs are responsible for a marked reduction of Lactobacilli, which act in the maintenance of luminal pH, mucosal permeability, enterocyte adhesion, mucus production, and immune system modulation. Moreover, Bifidobacteria are involved in the modulation of intestinal motility and local immunity and the demonstrated dangerous effect of NSAIDs could operate through an interference with these functions. A participation of microbiota in mesalazine and salycilate prevention of intestinal cancer may be supposed through their ability to stimulate bacterial production of molecules interfering with cell cycle on the basis of scanty available data. Finally, a supplementation with probiotics in chronic users of NSAIDs may help microbiota remodeling in a damaged intestine, but the poor current knowledge does not allow setting a clear indication for their use despite few evidences of a beneficial effect. In conclusion, it is presumable that the multiple effects of NSAIDs on the lower gastro-intestinal tract may involve microbiota alterations and this consideration suggests further investigations.

Risk factors associated with uncomplicated peptic ulcer and changes in medication use after diagnosis.

BackgroundFew epidemiologic studies have investigated predictors of uncomplicated peptic ulcer disease (PUD) separately from predictors of complicated PUD.ObjectiveTo analyze risk factors associated with uncomplicated PUD and medication use after diagnosis.MethodsPatients diagnosed with uncomplicated PUD (n = 3,914) were identified from The Health Improvement Network database among individuals aged 40–84 years during 1997–2005, with no previous history of PUD. Prescription records for the year after the date of diagnosis were reviewed and a nested case–control analysis was performed to calculate the odds ratios for the association of potential risk factors with PUD.ResultsMedications associated with developing uncomplicated PUD included current use of acetylsalicylic acid (ASA), nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), paracetamol, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors, antidepressants, antihypertensives or acid suppressants. Uncomplicated PUD was significantly associated with being a current or former smoker and having had a score of at least 3 on the Townsend deprivation index. Approximately 50% of patients who were users of ASA (19% of patients) or chronic users of NSAIDs (7% of patients) at diagnosis did not receive another prescription of the medication in the 60 days after diagnosis, and 30% were not represcribed therapy within a year. Among patients who were current users of ASA or chronic NSAIDs at the time of the PUD diagnosis and received a subsequent prescription for their ASA or NSAID during the following year, the vast majority (80–90%) also received a proton pump inhibitor coprescription.ConclusionsOur results indicate that several risk factors for upper gastrointestinal bleeding are also predictors of uncomplicated PUD, and that some patients do not restart therapy with ASA or NSAIDs after a diagnosis of uncomplicated PUD. Further investigation is needed regarding the consequences for these patients in terms of increased cardiovascular burden due to discontinuation of antiplatelet therapy.

Lower-dose diclofenac capsules developed using solumatrix fine particle technology result in clinically meaningful improvements in pain in a phase 3 study of patients with osteoarthritis

Lower-dose diclofenac capsules developed using solumatrix fine particle technology result in clinically meaningful improvements in pain in a phase 3 study of patients with osteoarthritis

Role of small intestinal bacterial overgrowth in severe small intestinal damage in chronic non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug users

Objective. Enteric bacteria play a significant role in the pathogenesis of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID)-induced small intestinal damage. However, the association between small intestinal bacterial overgrowth (SIBO) and NSAID-induced small intestinal damage remains unclear. The aim of the study was to examine the association between SIBO and the presence of NSAID-induced severe small intestinal damage or its symptoms in chronic NSAID users. Materials and methods. Forty-three patients who had been using NSAIDs for over 3 months were enrolled. They were examined by capsule endoscopy and a lactulose hydrogen breath test (LHBT). We defined severe small intestinal damage as the presence of more than four small erosions or large erosions/ulcers. The LHBT result was considered positive if there was an increase in the level of breath hydrogen gas of >20 ppm above baseline. Results. Out of 43 patients, 22 (51%) had severe small intestinal damage. The LHBT was positive in 5 of 21 patients (24%) without severe small intestinal damage and in 13 of 21 patients (59%) with severe small intestinal damage. Multiple logistic regression analysis showed that an LHBT-positive result was significantly associated with increased odds ratio for severe small intestinal damage (OR, 6.54; 95% CI, 1.40–30.50). There was no significant difference in the presence of symptoms between the LHBT-positive and LHBT-negative patients with severe small intestinal damage. Conclusion. SIBO might have a role in the development of severe small intestinal damage in chronic NSAID users.

Small-bowel mucosal injuries in low-dose aspirin users with obscure gastrointestinal bleeding.

To investigate the clinical differences between small intestinal injuries in low-dose aspirin (LDA) users and in non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) users who were examined by capsule endoscopy (CE) for obscure gastrointestinal bleeding (OGIB). A total of 181 patients who underwent CE for OGIB were included in this study. Based on clinical records, laboratory data such as hemoglobin levels, major symptoms, underlying diseases, the types and duration of LDA and NSAID use, and endoscopic characteristics of CE were reviewed. Out of a total of 45 cases of erosive lesions, 27 cases were taking LDA or NSAIDs (7 were on NSAIDs, 9 were on LDA alone, 9 were on LDA and thienopyridine, and 2 were on LDA and warfarin).The prevalence of ulcers or erosion during chronic use of LDA, LDA and the anti-platelet drug thienopyridine (clopidogrel or ticlopidine), and NSAIDs were 64.3%, 80.0%, and 75.0%, respectively. Erosive lesions were observed predominantly in chronic LDA users, while ulcerative lesions were detected mainly in NSAID users. However, concomitant use of thienopyridine such as clopidogrel with LDA increased the proportion of ulcers. The erosive lesions were located in the whole of the small intestine (jejunum and ileum), whereas ulcerative lesions were mainly observed in the ileum (P < 0.05). Our CE findings indicate that chronic LDA users and NSAID users show different types and locations of small-bowel mucosal injuries. The concomitant use of anti-platelet drugs with LDA tends to exacerbate the injuries from LDA-type to NSAID-type injuries.

Gastroprotective Strategies in Chronic NSAID Users: A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis Comparing Single-Tablet Formulations with Individual Components

ObjectivesTo evaluate the cost-effectiveness of competing gastroprotective strategies, including single-tablet formulations, in the prevention of gastrointestinal (GI) complications in patients with chronic arthritis taking nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). MethodsWe performed a cost-utility analysis to compare eight gastroprotective strategies including NSAIDs, cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitors, proton pump inhibitors (PPIs), histamine-2 receptor antagonists, misoprostol, and single-tablet formulations. We derived estimates for outcomes and costs from medical literature. The primary outcome was incremental cost per quality-adjusted life-year gained. We performed sensitivity analyses to assess the effect of GI complications, compliance rates, and drug costs. ResultsFor average-risk patients, NSAID + PPI cotherapy was most cost-effective. The NSAID/PPI single-tablet formulation became cost-effective only when its price decreased from €0.78 to €0.56 per tablet, or when PPI compliance fell below 51% in the NSAID + PPI strategy. All other strategies were more costly and less effective. The model was highly sensitive to the GI complication risk, costs of PPI and NSAID/PPI single-tablet formulation, and compliance to PPI. In patients with a threefold higher risk of GI complications, both NSAID + PPI cotherapy and single-tablet formulation were cost-effective. ConclusionsNSAID + PPI cotherapy is the most cost-effective strategy in all patients with chronic arthritis irrespective of their risk for GI complications. For patients with increased GI risk, the NSAID/PPI single-tablet formulation is also cost-effective.