Chronic Non-specific Low Back Pain Research Articles

Effectiveness of telerehabilitation-based mckenzie method versus manual therapy in low-back pain management: a randomised controlled trial

Abstract Background Studies comparing the effectiveness of telerehabilitation and spinal manual therapy (SMT) for chronic non-specific low-back pain (NSLBP) are limited. This study aimed to compare the efficacy of the telerehabilitation-based McKenzie therapy (TBMT) and SMT among patients with NSLBP. Methods Forty-nine consenting patients randomised into either TBMT (n = 28) or SMT (n = 21) group completed the study. TBMT is a mobile phone-based telerehabilitation involving the ‘McKenzie extension protocol’. SMT is a grade II (10 oscillations) posterior-anterior central vertebral pressure on the offending spinous process. Both interventions were applied thrice weekly for eight weeks, and outcomes were assessed on Pain Intensity (PI), Activity Limitation (AL), Participation Restriction (PR), and Health-related Quality of Life (HRQoL) in the fourth and eighth weeks. Results Within-group comparison across baseline, 4th and 8th week indicate that SMT had a significant effect on PI (F = 132.804, p = 0.001), AL (F = 75.984, p = 0.001), PR (F = 99.428, p = 0.001) and for all the scales of SF-12 except for mental health domain (p > 0.05). Similarly, TBMT had a significant effect on PI (F = 243.631; p = 0.001), AL (F = 85.930; p = 0.001), PR (F = 48.425; p = 0.001), and for all the scales except also for mental health domain (p > 0.05). However, there were no significant differences (p > 0.05) in the treatment effects between SMT and TBMT, except for the ‘health perception’ (p = 0.045) scale at week four and the ‘mental health’ scale (p = 0.023) at week eight. Conclusion Telerehabilitation-based McKenzie method and SMT are effective in chronic NSLBP, with TBMT leading to significantly higher long-term health perception improvement. Trial Registration Pan African Clinical Trial Registry (PACTR202010667228786), Registered 27 October 2020-Retrospectively registered.

Lipid Alterations in Chronic Nonspecific Low Back Pain in the Chinese Population: A Metabolomic and Lipidomic Study

Chronic nonspecific low back pain (cNLBP) accounts for approximately 90% of low back pain cases, affecting 65–80% of the population and significantly impacting life quality and productivity. This condition also leads to substantial financial burden. Although there have been advancements, a comprehensive understanding of the underlying etiology of cNLBP remains elusive, resulting in less than optimal treatment outcomes. This study aimed to examine the correlation between lipid variations and the development of cNLBP. The cohort consisted of 26 healthy volunteers (HV group) and 30 cNLBP patients, with an assessment of metabolites and lipid composition in both groups. Metabolomic results revealed significant alterations in lipid-associated metabolites between the HV and cNLBP groups. Subsequent lipid analysis revealed that monoacylglycerols (MAGs) increased approximately 1.2-fold (p = 0.016), diacylglycerols (DAGs) increased approximately 1.4-fold (p = 0.0003), and phosphatidylserine (PS) increased approximately 1.4-fold (p = 0.011). In contrast, triacylglycerol (TAG) decreased to about 0.7-fold (p = 0.035) in the cNLBP group compared to the HV group. The contrasting trends in MAG/DAG and TAG levels indicated that the imbalance between MAG/DAG and TAG may have an impact on the development of cNLBP. This study has provided new insights into the relationship between the progression of cNLBP and specific lipids, suggesting that these lipids could serve as therapeutic targets for cNLBP.

Efficacy of Otago versus Bosu ball exercise protocol on core stabilization, static and dynamic balance in non-specific chronic low back pain: a randomized parallel arm clinical trial

Abstract Chronic non-specific low back pain (NSLBP) is a pain and stiffness in the lower back region for which specific cause of the pain is unknown. Otago exercises and Bosu ball exercises aim to improve balance and reduce pain and disability. There is a lack of literature where these approaches are not compared and hence the need arises to evaluate their efficacy in the management of NSLBP. A randomized parallel arm clinical trial was conducted in physiotherapy outpatient department at tertiary care center located in Belagavi city, India. 36 individuals with NSLBP, where 18 individuals were randomly allocated into two groups, i.e. Group A (Otago exercise) and Group B (both sides utilized (Bosu) ball exercise). Both the groups received conventional therapy (hot moist pack and interferential current therapy) 3 times/ week for 4 weeks. Outcome measures like plank holding test, star excursion balance test (SEBT), single-leg stance test (SLST), visual analogue scale (VAS) and Oswestry disability index (ODI) were assessed at baseline and on day 12 post-treatment. A within-group analysis using the Wilcoxon matched-pairs test and the dependent t-test showed statistically significant improvements in all outcome measures (). Between group analysis has shown both interventions to be equally effective in ODI () in individuals with NSLBP. In conclusion both Otago and Bosu ball exercises were effective, Bosu ball exercise demonstrated greater efficacy in enhancing core stability, static and dynamic balance, as well as reducing disability and pain in individuals with chronic NSLBP. Clinical trial registry of India: registration number CTRI/2023/11/059489

Quantitative magnetic resonance imaging of paraspinal muscles for assessing chronic non-specific low back pain in young adults: a prospective case-control study.

This study aimed to investigate the application of quantitative magnetic resonance imaging of paraspinal muscles in assessing the young CNLBP with unilateral symptom. This prospective study enrolled 107 young individuals with unilateral symptomatic CNLBP (56 cases) and a normal cohort (51 cases). All subjects underwent conventional lumbar sequences, T2 mapping, and IDEAL-IQ scans at 3T. T2 values and fat fraction (FF) of bilateral multifidus (mid-levels of L2-L5 vertebrae) and erector spinae (mid-levels of L1-L4 vertebrae) were measured. CNLBP severity, Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) score, and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) score were recorded. Wilcoxon signed-rank tests were used to compare parameter differences between painful and non-painful sides in the case group. Mann-Whitney U tests were employed to evaluate differences between the case and normal group. Logistic regression analysis was conducted to identify predictive factors and to establish a combined model. In the case group, erector spinae FF values (L4 level), erector spinae T2 values (L1, L2, and L4 levels), and multifidus T2 values (L4 and L5 levels) were higher on the painful side (P<0.05). Multifidus T2 values (L5 level) and FF values (L2-L5 levels) were higher in the case group compared to the normal group (P<0.05). The optimal performance in differentiating young CNLBP was the combination of L5 level multifidus T2 value with FF (AUC = 91.81%). Negative correlation existed between T2 values and FF of multifidus at L5 level and JOA scores (r=-0.41, P < 0.05), and positive correlation with VAS scores (r = 0.46, P < 0.05). The combination of T2 value and FF may provide deeper insights into the pathological alterations of paraspinal muscles in young CNLBP, providing an important imaging basis for clinical judgment and preventive treatment of non-painful side in unilateral symptomatic patients.

Exploring temporal congruence in motor imagery and movement execution in non-specific chronic low back pain

Chronic non-specific low back pain (NSCLBP) is linked to sensorimotor dysfunctions and altered motor planning, likely due to neuroplastic changes. Motor imagery (MI) and movement execution share neural pathways, but the relationship between imagined and executed movements in NSCLBP patients remains underexplored. This study aimed to assess the temporal congruence between imagined and executed movements in NSCLBP sufferers, with secondary goals of investigating group differences in movement chronometry, psychological well-being, and disability, as well as possible correlations among these factors. Fifty-six participants, including 28 NSCLBP patients and 28 asymptomatic subjects (AS), performed lumbar flexion and Timed Up and Go (TUG) tasks. NSCLBP patients showed significant temporal incongruence in both tasks, executing movements more slowly than imagined, whereas AS displayed incongruence only in the TUG task. NSCLBP patients also took longer to imagine and execute lumbar flexion movements compared to AS, with correlations observed between execution delays, higher disability, and greater fear of movement. The findings highlight a lack of temporal congruence in NSCLBP patients, especially in lumbar flexion, emphasizing the complex relationship between chronic pain, motor ability, and psychological factors. These results suggest that integrated treatment approaches addressing cognitive and emotional aspects are crucial for managing NSCLBP.

Validation of the Pelvic Floor and Core Exercise Protocol in Indian Women with Chronic Non-specific Low Back Pain

Validation of the Pelvic Floor and Core Exercise Protocol in Indian Women with Chronic Non-specific Low Back Pain

Combined exercise Intervention protocol validation in sedentary workers health risk with Nonspecific Chronic low back pain People

Background: Most chronic low back pain is nonspecific as the cause of the pain is unknown. Hence exercise protocol focussing on one area of fitness is not appropriate. A general exercise programme that combines muscular strength, flexibility and aerobic fitness would benefit the rehabilitation of Nonspecific Chronic Low Back Pain and its health risk. The present study aimed to validate the content of the combined exercise intervention protocol. Methods: The development and expert judgement stages are part of the content validation process. The development of the exercise protocol was based on a comprehensive literature review. The protocol was created in a step-by-step progressive manner. Exercises for flexibility (20 minutes), stabilisation and strengthening (20 minutes), and aerobic (20 minutes) make up the three main parts of the exercise protocol. 12 independent professionals with a minimum of 10 years of experience were invited. Ten of the twelve specialists consented to take part in the study. In India, all of the professionals were engaged in orthopaedic and musculoskeletal physical therapy. There are two professors, three associate professors, and five senior physiotherapists among the experts. Responses were gathered by mail. During the validation phase, The Exercise protocol was graded by the experts on relevance and ease of performance using a 5-point scale. After collecting the responses content validity index and kappa values were calculated. Results: 37 out of 39 items in the combined exercise intervention protocol showed good agreement. Treadmill walking with 60-75% and 80% and above target heart rate showed a kappa value of 0.66 for relevance and 0.50 for ease of performance. Conclusions: The designed exercise protocol exhibited good content validity.

Management of patients with chronic low back pain in outpatient practice: a clinical observation

Back pain is one of the most common reasons for visits to the doctor and temporary disability. In non-specific chronic low back pain (CLBP) most effective approach is a complex (multidisciplinary) approach, aimed at relieving pain and improving the quality of life by using an educational program, kinesiotherapy, psychological methods and optimization of drug therapy. We present the observation of a 48-year-old patient with CLBP whose treatment was ineffective during one year. The patient was repeatedly prescribed medications, and the methods of magnetotherapy, massage, phonophoresis with hydrocortisone. Educational program, kinesiotherapy and psychological methods were not applied. The examination of the patient revealed emotional disorders, misconceptions about the disease and a pronounced functional impairment due to pain. The application of a complex therapy, which included an educational program, individual kinesiotherapy, psychological methods, Dexalgin as a non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug, led to a significant reduction in pain after 7 days and a complete regression of symptoms after 2 months. The issues of efficacy and safety of the use of Dexalgin and the possibility of introducing the complex approach into the clinical practice of management of patients with chronic back pain are discussed.

Relationship between the flexion relaxation phenomenon and kinematics of the multi-segmental spine in nonspecific chronic low back pain patients

The flexion relaxation phenomenon (FRP) is characterized by the reduction of paraspinal muscle activity at maximum trunk flexion. FRP is reported to be altered (persistence of spinal muscle activity) in more than half of nonspecific chronic low back pain (NSCLBP) patients. Little is known about how the multi-segmental spine affects FRP. The aim of this observational study was to investigate the relationship between FRP and kinematic parameters of the multi-segmental spine in NSCLBP patients. Forty NSCLBP patients and thirty-five asymptomatic participants performed a standing maximal trunk flexion task. Surface electromyography was recorded along the erector spinae longissimus. The kinematics of the spine were assessed using a 3D motion analysis system. The investigated spinal segments were upper thoracic, lower thoracic, thoracolumbar, upper lumbar, lower lumbar, and lumbopelvic. Upper lumbar ROM, anterior sagittal inclination of the upper lumbar relative to the lower lumbar in the upright position, and ROM of the upper lumbar relative to the lower lumbar during full trunk flexion were significantly correlated with the flexion relaxation ratio (Rho 0.42 to 0.58, p < 0.006). The relative position and movement of the upper lumbar segment seem to play an important role in the presence or absence of FRP in NSCLBP patients.

Ultrasound Evaluation of Onset Core Muscle Activity in Subjects with Non-Specific Lower Back Pain and Without Lower Back Pain: An Observational Case-Control Study.

Lower back pain (LBP) has been the leading cause of disability since 1990. Objectives: The main objective of this observational case-control study was to evaluate, using ultrasound, whether there were differences in the onset and ratio of core muscle contraction between subjects with non-specific chronic lower back pain and healthy subjects. Methods: A total of 60 participants (52% women), split between those with non-specific chronic lower back pain (n = 26) and healthy (n = 34) subjects, were recruited. Initial muscle contraction of the lateral abdominal wall, pelvic floor, lumbar multifidus, and respiratory diaphragm was measured using ultrasound. The abdominal drawing-in maneuver, contralateral arm elevation, the Valsalva maneuver, and voluntary contraction of the pelvic floor in seated and standing positions were performed. The muscle thickness of the lateral abdominal wall and lumbar multifidus and excursion of the pelvic floor and diaphragm at rest and during testing were also analyzed. Results: No differences were found between the groups in the initial contraction. Statistically significant differences were found in the following variables: diaphragm excursion (p = 0.032, r = 0.277) and lumbar multifidus ratio (p = 0.010, r = 0.333) in the standing-abdominal retraction maneuver; pelvic floor excursion (p = 0.012, r = 0.325) in the standing-contralateral arm raise; and transverse abdominis ratio (p = 0.033, r = 0.275) in the sitting-contralateral arm raise. A statistically significant interaction between the groups and body mass index was observed in resting diaphragm excursion (p = 0.018, partial eta squared = 0.096) during sitting-voluntary pelvic floor contraction. Conclusions: It cannot be concluded that there is a specific pattern of core activation in any of the groups. However, statistically significant differences were found in the contraction indexes of the lumbopelvic musculature.

Positional Release Technique vs. Cognitive Behavioral Therapy on Pain Intensity in Chronic Non-specific Low Back Pain: A Randomized Control Trail

..

The effectiveness of massage gun treatment combined with passive stretching in reducing non-specific lower back pain

Non-specific lower back pain is a common condition characterized by strain, muscle spasms, or weakness of the paraspinal muscles, particularly the multifidus muscle, which affects adjacent musculature such as the gluteus, hamstrings, and quadriceps. This study aimed to investigate whether massage gun treatment combined with passive stretching could reduce non-specific low back pain in patients experiencing subacute and chronic phases of this condition. This pseudo-experimental research employed a one-group pretest-posttest design with three treatments. Participants were selected using purposive sampling based on inclusion criteria: suffering from non-specific low back pain, willingness to participate, and age between 20 and 65 years. Exclusion criteria included anatomical abnormalities of the spine, fractures, open wounds, and specific spinal disorders. The visual analog scale (VAS) was used to measure pain intensity before and after each treatment session. Initial VAS scores averaged 65.6 units. Following the first treatment, scores decreased significantly to 52.1 units; subsequent reductions occurred at 42.1 units post-second treatment and 33.5 units post-third treatment. Statistical analysis revealed a significant difference across all three treatment sessions (p = 0.000 0.05), indicating a progressive improvement in pain control over time. Massage gun therapy coupled with passive stretching demonstrated efficacy in reducing non-specific lower back pain among participants. These findings suggest that repeated application of these interventions can lead to sustained improvements in pain management for individuals suffering from subacute and chronic non-specific low back pain conditions

Tuina versus physiotherapy or a combination of both for the management of chronic nonspecific low back pain: A randomized controlled trial

ObjectiveTo rigorously evaluate the short-term and long-term effectiveness of Tuina (TN), alone and in combination with physiotherapy (PT), for Chronic nonspecific low back pain (CNLBP) through a comprehensive, high-quality clinical trial. MethodsThis randomized, single-blind trial was conducted from September 2020 to July 2023, involving 204 CNLBP patients from the First Affiliated Hospital of Jinan University. Participants underwent a baseline assessment, 6 treatment sessions over 8 weeks, a post-treatment evaluation in the 9th week, and a 20-week follow-up. Participants were randomly assigned to TN, PT, or a combination of TN and PT (TP) groups. Each treatment involved 6 sessions with a minimum 7-day interval, each lasting 30 minutes. Primary outcome was the change in Visual Analog Scale (VAS) for pain. Secondary outcomes included the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI), 36-Item Short Form Health Survey (SF-36), Range of Motion (ROM) of the spine, Traditional Chinese Medicine Syndrome Scale (TCMSS), and adverse events (AE). ResultsAmong the 204 participants, 67.16 % were female, and 88.73 % completed the 20-week follow-up. All groups showed significant reductions in VAS scores post-treatment and at follow-up. Secondary outcomes improved significantly, with notable decreases in ODI and TCMSS scores. Pairwise comparisons within groups indicated statistical significance, particularly in ODI scores, with clinical relevance. No significant differences were found between the groups. ROM and SF-36 showed statistical but not clinical significance. Only one AE (0.49 %) was reported, with no severe incidents. ConclusionAll treatment groups, including TN, TP, and PT, demonstrated significant reductions in VAS scores for CNLBP patients, with effects lasting up to 20 weeks. While TN and TP showed substantial improvements in secondary outcomes, particularly in ODI scores, no significant differences were found between the groups. These findings suggest that all treatments can be effective for managing CNLBP, supporting clinical practitioners in selecting appropriate interventions for patients, especially for those unable to engage in active exercises, utilizing passive movements like TN to enhance health outcomes.

Efficacy of antidepressants in the treatment of chronic nonspecific low back pain: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Aim: This study reassesses the efficacy and safety of antidepressants in treating nonspecific chronic low back pain (NCLBP).Materials & methods: A systematic review was conducted following PRISMA guidelines, including randomized clinical trials (RCTs) from PubMed, Embase, Scopus, LILACS, SciELO and Cochrane CENTRAL, published through August 2024. Studies compared antidepressants with placebo or active comparators. The primary outcomes were pain relief and quality of life. Protocol registration: www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero identifier is CRD42023307516.Results: Nine RCTs involving 1758 patients were analyzed. The antidepressants examined included duloxetine, escitalopram, bupropion, amitriptyline, imipramine and desipramine. Duloxetine 60mg significantly reduced pain (MD=-0.57; 95% CI=-0.78 to -0.36) and improved quality of life compared with placebo, with side effects that were generally tolerable. Notably, higher doses of duloxetine (120mg) were associated with an increase in adverse events. However, other antidepressants like amitriptyline and escitalopram demonstrated only modest or inconsistent effects.Conclusion: Duloxetine at 60mg provides consistent pain relief and improves the quality of life in NCLBP, but higher doses increase adverse events. Escitalopram might offer modest benefits but should be considered a third-line treatment. Other antidepressants, such as amitriptyline, bupropion, imipramine and desipramine, have limited evidence supporting their efficacy and are associated with adverse effects.

Running is acceptable and efficacious in adults with non-specific chronic low back pain: the ASTEROID randomised controlled trial

ObjectivesRunning is one of the most accessible forms of exercise, yet its suitability for adults with chronic low back pain (LBP) is unknown. This study assessed the efficacy and acceptability...

Effects of osteopathic manipulative treatment associated with transcranial direct current stimulation in individuals with chronic low back pain: A double-blind, randomised placebo-controlled trial.

To evaluate the effectiveness of osteopathic manipulative treatment (OMT) associated with transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) in reducing pain, disability, and improving quality of life in participants with non-specific chronic low back pain. A randomised double-blind clinical trial. Clinical outpatient unit. 72 participants with non-specific chronic low back pain were randomised into three groups: active tDCS + OMT (n = 24), sham tDCS + sham OMT (n = 24), and sham tDCS + OMT (n = 24). Evaluations were performed before, after the intervention, and one month post-intervention. tDCS consisted of ten 20-minute sessions over two weeks (five sessions per week). OMT was administered once per week, with two sessions conducted before the first and sixth tDCS sessions. Pain, disability, and quality of life were assessed at baseline, after two weeks, and at one month of follow-up. The visual analogue scale showed a significant decrease in all groups (p < 0.001). However, tDCS + OMT and sham tDCS + OMT demonstrated a clinically significant reduction compared to the sham combination (effect size n² = 0.315). Roland-Morris scores decreased across all groups without specific group effects. EuroQoL 5-Dimension 3-Level improvement was observed only in the tDCS + OMT and sham tDCS + OMT groups (significant difference between T2 and T0, p = 0.002). The combination of OMT and tDCS did not provide clinically significant improvement over OMT alone in participants with non-specific chronic low back pain.

Examining spinal mobility, aerobic capacity and functional movement in patients with non-specific chronic low back pain: a case-control study

Background/Aims The increasing cost and incidence of non-specific chronic low back pain means that many physiotherapists are reconsidering the management of this condition. The primary aim of this study was to examine spinal mobility, aerobic capacity and functional movement screen in patients with non-specific chronic low back pain. The secondary aim was to determine the factors affecting the disability level. Methods Participants aged between 18–65 years old diagnosed with non-specific chronic low back pain for &gt;3 months were recruited as a study group, while those without low back pain in the last 3 months were the control group. Outcome measures included the Functional Movement Screen for functional movement, the 2-Minute Step Test for aerobic capacity, the Spinal Mouse for spinal mobility and Oswestry Disability Index for disability level. Results A total of 60 participants, 30 people with non-specific chronic low back pain (42.7 ± 10.6 years) and 30 people without low back pain (42.0 ± 7.3 years), were included in this study. There were statistically significant differences in the total sagittal plane angle (P&lt;0.001), total frontal plane angle (P=0.03), 2-Minute Step Test (P&lt;0.001) and Functional Movement Screen (P&lt;0.001) scores between groups. Pain and aerobic capacity explained 42.4% of the variance as determinants of disability in the study group. Conclusions In people with non-specific chronic low back pain, sagittal and frontal plane range of motion and aerobic capacity were decreased and their functional movements were impaired. Pain intensity and aerobic capacity affect the disability level of non-specific chronic low back pain. Implications for practice People with non-specific chronic low back pain have reduced spinal mobility, aerobic capacity and functional movement. These parameters should be included when determining treatment programmes. At the same time, the level of disability can be reduced by decreasing pain intensity and increasing aerobic capacity of people with low back pain.

The Effects of Open/Closed Kinetic Chain Exercises in Water on the Electrical Activity of Selected Lumbar Muscles, Lumbopelvic Control, Ground Reaction Force and Psychological Factors in Men with Chronic Non-Specific Low Back Pain: A Study Protocol for a Randomized Clinical Trial

Background and aimResearch has documented chronic non-specific low back pain (CNSLBP) as one of the primary causes of absenteeism at work, often accompanied by the use of health insurance and healthcare services. Considering little research on the consequences of open/closed kinetic chain (O/CKC) exercises in water on CNSLBP improvement, the present study is to investigate the effects of such interventions on the electrical activity of selected lumbar muscles, pain, lumbopelvic control (LPC), ground reaction force (GRF), and psychological factors in men with CNSLBP. Materials and MethodsThis is a randomized controlled trial that involves individuals with CNSLBP between the ages of 40 and 60 years. Participants are randomly assigned, using block randomization, to one of the following groups: open kinetic chain (OKC) exercises, closed kinetic chain (CKC) exercises, or controls. The training groups engage in the exercises for eight weeks, with three sessions per week and 60 minutes each at the University of Bu-Ali Sina pool, following the prescribed workout routine. The primary outcomes of the electrical activity of the multifidus (MF), transversus abdominis (TrA), gluteus medius (GM), and quadratus lumborum (QL) muscles are measured by an electromyography (EMG) device. Additionally, the pressure biofeedback (BFB) device and the visual analog scale (VAS) are utilized to assess LPC and pain intensity, respectively. The secondary outcomes of the GRF, along with foot pressure and kinesiophobia, are subsequently measured by the Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia (TSK). ConclusionBy comparing the outcomes between the OKC exercise group, CKC exercise group, and control group, this study aims to determine the differential effects of these two water-based exercise interventions on the various physical and psychological parameters in individuals with CNSLBP. The findings provide valuable insights into the most effective approach to water-based rehabilitation for individuals with CNSLBP. By comparing the outcomes of OKC and CKC exercises, healthcare professionals can make informed decisions when designing tailored rehabilitation programs for this patient population. The results also contribute to the development of evidence-based guidelines for the management of CNSLBP using water-based exercises.

Ayurveda interventions against Non-specific chronic low back pain- A structured study protocol for systematic review and network meta-analysis

Ayurveda interventions against Non-specific chronic low back pain- A structured study protocol for systematic review and network meta-analysis

Influence of muscle regions of meridians needling method combined with auricular point sticking on pain and range of motion in patients with chronic nonspecific low back pain

Influence of muscle regions of meridians needling method combined with auricular point sticking on pain and range of motion in patients with chronic nonspecific low back pain