Chronic Iliofemoral Venous Obstruction Research Articles

Impact of native iliac vein aspect ratio on initial clinical presentation and outcomes following stenting for symptomatic chronic iliofemoral venous obstruction

ObjectiveVenous stenting has become the first line of treatment for patients with symptomatic chronic iliofemoral venous obstruction (CIVO) in whom conservative therapy has failed. Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) interrogation with the use of normal minimal luminal diameters or areas has become the standard to confirm the diagnosis and determine the adequacy of stenting. However, the aspect ratio (ratio between the maximal and minimal luminal diameters) has also been put forth as a possible metric for determining stent adequacy. This study explores the utility of the native iliac vein and stent aspect ratios in determining the initial presentation and outcomes after stenting. MethodsA retrospective analysis of contemporaneously entered data from patients who underwent stenting for quality of life (QoL)-impairing clinical manifestations of CIVO for whom conservative therapy had failed formed the study cohort. The limbs were grouped into three at the time of intervention using the IVUS-determined native vein aspect ratio: group I, those with a ratio of ≤1.4; group II, those with a ratio of 1.41 to 1.99; and group III, those with a ratio of ≥2. The characteristics appraised initially and after stenting included the venous clinical severity score, grade of swelling (GOS), visual analog scale (VAS) for pain score, and the CIVIQ-20 QoL score. Analysis of variance and paired and unpaired t tests were used for comparison of clinical and QoL variables, and Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to evaluate stent patency, with the log-rank test used to discriminate between different curves. ResultsThere were a total of 236 limbs (236 patients). The median age for the entire cohort was 62 years (range, 16-92 years). There were 161 women in the study, and left laterality was more common (137 limbs). Post-thrombotic obstruction was noted in 201 limbs (86%). The median body mass index was 36 kg/m2. There were 54 (23%), 64 (27%), and 118 (50%) limbs in groups I, II, and III, respectively. The median follow-up was 65 months. For the entire cohort, after stenting, the venous clinical severity score improved from 6 to 4 (P < .0001) at 3 months and remained at 4 at 6 months (P < .0001), 12 months (P < .0001), and 24 months (P < .0001). The GOS for the entire cohort improved from 3 to 1 (P < .0001) at 3 months and remained at 1 at 6 months (P < .0001), 12 months (P < .0001), and 24 months (P < .0001). The VAS for pain score for the entire cohort improved from 7 to 0 (P < .0001) at 3 months, increased to 2 (P < .0001) at 6 months, and remained at 2 (P < .0001) at 12 months. At 24 months, the VAS for pain score worsened to 3 (P < .0001). For the entire cohort, the CIVIQ-20 score improved from 62 to 40 (P < .0001). There was no difference in the GOS, VAS for pain score, or CIVIQ-20 score between the groups at baseline or at 6, 12, and 24 months after intervention. At 60 months, the primary stent patency was 89% for group I, 80% for group II, and 75% for group III (P = .85). The primary assisted stent patency was 100% for group I, 98% for group II, and 98% for group III (P = .5). Secondary patency was 100% for groups II and III (P > .5). Reintervention was pursued for QoL-impairing clinical manifestations in 53 limbs (22%) without a significant difference between the three groups (P = .13). ConclusionsThe native vein aspect ratio does not appear to determine the initial clinical presentation or QoL or impact the clinical or QoL outcomes after stenting in patients undergoing stenting for QOL-impairing symptoms of CIVO in whom conservative therapy has failed. After stenting, there was an improvement in the aspect ratios (97% in group I and 3% in group 2) compared with the prestenting native vein aspect ratios (23% in group I, 27% in group II, and 50% in group III). The IVUS-determined minimal cross-sectional luminal area and not the aspect ratios should be used for confirmation of the diagnosis of CIVO and to assess the adequacy of stenting.

Femoral vein stenting versus endovenectomy as adjuncts to iliofemoral venous stenting in extensive chronic iliofemoral venous obstruction.

To compare femoral endovenectomy with the creation of an arteriovenous fistula (FE + AVF), versus iliofemoral endovenous stenting with the concurrent extended femoral vein (FV-S) stenting in patients with chronic iliofemoral venous obstruction (IFVO). In a randomized prospective single-center study, 48 received (FV-S), while the other 54 had (FE + AVF). There were no statistically significant differences in the primary outcomes between the two groups (FV-S) and (FE + AVF) (59% vs 56.8%, 75% vs 79.1%, respectively). At a median of 13months after the treatment. However, the FV-S group's patients experienced fewer postoperative problems (p = .012), shorter procedures (p = .001), and shorter stays in the hospital (p = .025). There is no difference between the efficacy and symptomatic resolution of the FV-S group and the FE + AVF group at the same time, FV-S has lower postoperative complications and a shorter procedure duration and hospital stay.

Inguinal intranodal lymphangiography reveals a high incidence of suprainguinal lymphatic disease in patients with leg edema undergoing stenting for symptomatic chronic iliofemoral venous obstruction

Inguinal intranodal lymphangiography reveals a high incidence of suprainguinal lymphatic disease in patients with leg edema undergoing stenting for symptomatic chronic iliofemoral venous obstruction

The beneficial role of complex decongestive therapy in patients with symptomatic chronic iliofemoral venous obstruction with phlebolymphedema

ObjectivePhlebolymphedema has been noted to be one of the most common causes of lymphedema in the lower extremity in western societies. Although complex decongestive therapy (CDT) represents the mainstay of lymphedema treatment, its role for phlebolymphedema arising from chronic iliofemoral venous obstruction (CIVO) merits further exploration. We evaluated this through the use of a protocol of CDT first for limbs with CEAP (clinical, etiologic, anatomic, pathophysiologic) clinical C3 disease and stent correction of obstruction before CDT for those with more advanced disease (CEAP C4-C6). In the present study, we analyzed the outcomes after the use of such a protocol. MethodsWe analyzed prospectively collected data for 192 limbs (166 patients) that underwent treatment of quality-of-life (QoL) impairing symptoms from CIVO due to lymphoscintigraphically determined phlebolymphedema between 2017 and 2022. The characteristics evaluated included CEAP clinical class, venous clinical severity score (VCSS), grade of swelling (GOS), visual analog scale (VAS) pain score, QoL (CIVIQ-20 [20-item chronic venous disease quality of life questionnaire]), stenting for CIVO, and outcomes related to CDT and stenting. For the limbs undergoing CDT or stenting followed by CDT, the outcomes were evaluated at 6 weeks and 3, 6, and 12 months after completion of CDT. Paired and unpaired t tests, χ2 tests, and analysis of variance were used for comparisons of clinical variables. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to evaluate stent patency, with the log-rank test used to discriminate between different curves. ResultsOf the 192 limbs (166 patients) in the entire cohort, 74 were in the C3 group and 118 were in the C4-C6 group. The median patient age was 63 years; 57 were men and 109 were women. In the C3 group, after CDT, improvement had occurred in the VCSS and VAS pain score at 6 weeks (P < .0001) and at 3 (P < .0001), 6 (P < .0001), and 12 (P < .0001) months. Improvement in the GOS was noted at 6 (P < .0001) and 12 (P = .0005) months. The CIVIQ-20 score improved from 63 to 38 (P = .009). Nine limbs (12%) in the C3 group required stenting after CDT. In the C4-C6 group, of the 118 limbs, 75 (64%) underwent stenting only and 43 (36%) underwent stenting followed by CDT for persistent QoL impairing symptoms. For this latter group, after CDT, improvement occurred in the VCSS, GOS, and VAS pain score at 6 weeks (P < .0001) and 3 (P < .0001), 6 (P < .0001), and 12 (P < .0001) months. The CIVIQ-20 score improved from 61 to 34 (P < .0001). The primary, primary assisted, and secondary patency in the C4-C6 group at 36 months was 92%, 100%, and 100%, respectively. ConclusionsFor CEAP C3 patients with phlebolymphedema due to CIVO, CDT should be a part of the first line of treatment. Stenting should be reserved for those with QoL impairing symptoms despite the use of CDT. Additionally, CDT helps provide symptom relief for patients with more advanced CEAP C4-C6 disease with persistent or residual edema after stenting. Further study is warranted.

Inguinal intranodal lymphangiography reveals a high incidence of suprainguinal lymphatic disease in patients with leg edema undergoing stenting for symptomatic chronic iliofemoral venous obstruction

ObjectiveRecent studies have emphasized the important role lymphatics play in the drainage of interstitial fluid and edema prevention. Although the infrainguinal lymphatics have been studied in some depth, with patterns of pathology identified, such data above the groin are sparse, especially for patients with phlebolymphedema. The present study attempts to evaluate the status of lymphatic flow above the inguinal ligament in patients presenting with edema and undergoing stenting for symptomatic chronic iliofemoral venous obstruction (CIVO). MethodsA total of 31 lower limbs that underwent pedal lymphoscintigraphy for leg edema and subsequent stenting for symptomatic CIVO formed the study cohort. Each limb underwent intranodal lymphangiography of an ipsilateral inferior inguinal lymph node (10 mL of lipiodol) at the time of stenting. Fluoroscopic visualization of lipiodol transit was performed at 20, 40, and 60 minutes and 3 hours after injection. Enumeration of the lymph nodes and lymphatic collector vessels from above the inguinal ligament to L1, visualization of the thoracic duct, the time delay to visualization of the thoracic duct, and pathologic changes to the thoracic duct when present were all evaluated. These anomalies were independently scored, with the scores combined to generate a total suprainguinal score (range, 0-3). This score was then compared to the limb's lymphoscintigraphically derived infrainguinal score (total infrainguinal score range, 0-3) using the t test and Spearman correlation. The clinical outcomes (grade of swelling, venous clinical severity score) after stenting were appraised. ResultsOf the 30 patients (31 limbs), 18 were women, with left laterality noted in 23 limbs. A nonthrombotic iliac vein lesion occurred in 9 limbs and post-thrombotic syndrome in 22 limbs. Of the 31 limbs, 24 (77%) had suprainguinal lymphatic disease (SLD), with 22 of the 24 limbs having severe SLD and 2, mild SLD. When SLD was compared with infrainguinal lymphatic disease, 6 limbs (19%) had the same degree of involvement above and below the groin (1 with normal and 5 with severe disease), 17 limbs (55%) had more severe SLD, and 8 limbs (26%) had more severe infrainguinal lymphatic disease. Three limbs with normal pedal lymphoscintigraphic findings had severe SLD. The Spearman correlation coefficient for the comparison of SLD and infrainguinal disease in the same limb was 0.1 (P = .69). At baseline, the limbs with severe SLD had the same degree of leg swelling and venous clinical severity score as the limbs with absent to mild SLD (P > .1) with similar improvements after stenting (P > .4). Seven limbs underwent complex decongestive therapy (all with severe SLD and concomitant severe infrainguinal disease in one) to treat significant residual leg edema, with improvement. ConclusionsSLD appears to be common in patients with leg edema undergoing stenting for symptomatic CIVO. Such disease appears to affect the thoracic duct more commonly. Although patients with persistent or residual leg edema after stenting can benefit from complex decongestive therapy, further workup in the form of inguinal intranodal lymphangiography and targeted intervention might need to be considered for those who do not benefit from such therapy. Further study is warranted.

Delphi Consensus on Reporting Standards in Clinical Studies for Endovascular Treatment of Acute Iliofemoral Venous Thrombosis and Chronic Iliofemoral Venous Obstruction.

Acute iliofemoral deep vein thrombosis and chronic iliofemoral venous obstruction cause substantial patient harm and are increasingly managed with endovascular venous interventions, including percutaneous mechanical thrombectomy and stent placement. However, studies of these treatment elements have not been designed and reported with sufficient rigor to support confident conclusions about their clinical utility. In this project, the Trustworthy consensus-based statement approach was utilized to develop, via a structured process, consensus-based statements to guide future investigators of venous interventions. Thirty statements were drafted to encompass major topics relevant to venous study description and design, safety outcome assessment, efficacy outcome assessment, and topics specific to evaluating percutaneous venous thrombectomy and stent placement. Using modified Delphi techniques for consensus achievement, a panel of physician experts in vascular disease voted on the statements and succeeded in reaching the predefined threshold of >80% consensus (agreement or strong agreement) on all 30 statements. It is hoped that the guidance from these statements will improve standardization, objectivity, and patient-centered relevance in the reporting of clinical outcomes of endovascular interventions for acute iliofemoral deep venous thrombosis and chronic iliofemoral venous obstruction in clinical studies and thereby enhance venous patient care.

Factors associated with difficulty in stenting the chronic iliofemoral venous obstruction.

The main aim of this article is to investigate the causes of technical failure during endovascular recanalization in patients with post-thrombotic syndrome with occluded iliofemoral veins and to suggest alternative techniques to improve outcomes in such challenging cases. Between November 2015 and August 2020, 230 patients (274 limbs) treated in our institution with symptomatic chronic iliofemoral venous obstruction underwent endovascular recanalization with angioplasty and stent placement. Overall, the initial attempt was unsuccessful in 15 limbs. We retrospectively analyzed the basic demographic and health characteristics of the involved patients and evaluated the endovascular procedures and techniques that resulted in a successful second intervention. The first attempts at endovascular intervention were unsuccessful in 15 of the 274 limbs (5.4%). Failures were attributed to hostile groin areas in intravenous drug abusers caused by multiple punctures in six cases. In addition, five interventions failed due to prior surgery at the site of venous occlusion and in retroperitoneal space, three patients due to severe stent deformity, and one patient due to congenital venous aplasia. Of the 15 patients, 11 underwent a subsequent attempt that included six successful recanalizations. The mean follow-up time of the six patients with successful recanalization was 27 months (5-62 months). The primary, assisted primary and secondary patency rates were 83.3%, 100%, and 100%, respectively. The remaining five patients, in whom the second recanalization attempt failed, received conservative treatment. Recanalization failure is rare in chronic venous obstruction patients. Severe stent deformities have the lowest chance of successful second intervention. Patients with a hostile groin or prior open surgeries at the occlusion site may be considered for reintervention with a success rate of nearly 50%.

The efficacy of stenting in the iliofemoral vein of patients with venous obstruction and secondary lymphedema from malignancy

ObjectiveTo investigate the safety and effectiveness of venous stenting in patients with chronic iliofemoral venous obstruction and secondary lymphedema from malignancy. MethodsFrom July 2012 to December 2020, patients with iliofemoral venous obstruction and secondary lymphedema who underwent venous stenting in our institution were reviewed retrospectively. Clinical characteristics, surgical complications, and symptom relief were assessed. Stent patency was evaluated with duplex ultrasound or computed tomographic venography. Twelve-month outcomes were reported. ResultsFifty-three patients with concurrent secondary lymphedema who had stents placed for iliofemoral venous obstruction were included. There were 42 females, and the mean age was 56.9 years. Nonthrombotic iliac vein lesions were identified in 16 patients (30.1%). Immediate technical success was 100%, with an average of two stents implanted. The median Villalta score, and Chronic Venous Disease Quality of Life quality of life questionnaire scores decreased from 12 (IQR, 10-15) and 58 (IQR, 50-66) at baseline, respectively, to 5 (interquartile range [IQR], 4-6) and 28 (IQR, 22-45) at 12 months after the procedure (P < .05), showing significant improvement in the quality of life. At the end of a median follow-up of 12 months (range, 3-25 months), the cumulative primary, assisted primary, and secondary patency rates were 70.8%, 76.9%, and 90.1%, respectively. ConclusionsIn patients with secondary lymphedema from malignancy, venous stent placement is safe and effective for iliofemoral venous obstruction.

Technique of stent sizing in patients with symptomatic chronic iliofemoral venous obstruction—the case for intravascular ultrasound-determined inflow channel luminal area-based stenting and associated long-term outcomes

ObjectiveFemoroiliocaval stenting has become the standard of care for patients with quality-of-life impairing chronic iliofemoral venous obstruction not responding to conservative measures. Although improvement after stenting has been noted in multiple large studies, sizing of stents has been subjective in nature with a general tendency to use smaller stents that would be required to relieve venous hypertension. This study evaluates the authors’ technique of using the intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) inflow channel luminal area to guide stent sizing. MethodsPatients who underwent femoroiliocaval stenting for quality-of-life impairing chronic iliofemoral venous obstruction and had failed conservative therapy from 2015 to 2021 were included in the study. Clinical outcomes including venous clinical severity score (VCSS), visual analog scale (VAS) pain score, and grade of swelling (GOS) were appraised before and after stenting. Also evaluated were quality of life (Chronic Venous Insufficiency Questionnaire-20 [CIVIQ-20] instrument) and stent outcomes including patencies and reinterventions. Comparisons were made between limbs that underwent placement of larger caliber stents (largest stent diameter >20 mm: >20 mm stent group) vs smaller caliber stents (largest stent diameter ≤20 mm: ≤20 mm stent group). t tests and analysis of variance were used to compare outcomes, whereas the Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to evaluate patencies with log rank used to compare the curves. ResultsA total of 300 patients (300 limbs) underwent stenting with a median age of 58 years. There was a preponderance of men (159 of 300), left laterality (176 of 300), and post-thrombotic syndrome (176 of 300). The median body mass index was 41. There were 120 limbs in the >20 mm stent group and 180 limbs in the ≤20 mm stent group. The median follow-up was 23 months. There was no significant difference in baseline VCSS, VAS pain score, or GOS between the two groups. However, there was a significant difference in IVUS-determined inflow channel luminal area between the two groups (228 mm2 >20 mm stent group vs 176 mm2 for ≤20 mm stent group [P < .0001]). After stenting there was a significant improvement in the VCSS, VAS pain score, and GOS at 6 weeks, 3, 6, 12, and 24 months (P < .0001) without any difference between the groups (P > .05). The CIVIQ-20 score also improved from 58 to 38 (P < .0001) for the entire cohort and for the two groups (P < .0001). Overall primary, primary-assisted, and secondary patencies at 60 months were 84%, 100%, and 100%, respectively. Reintervention rate was 10% without any difference between the groups. ConclusionsStent sizing using IVUS-determined inflow channel luminal area in patients undergoing stenting for quality-of-life impairing chronic iliofemoral venous obstruction resulted in a significant improvement in the VCSS, VAS pain score, GOS, and quality of life (CIVIQ-20) after stenting. Excellent stent patencies and low reintervention rates were also noted. IVUS-determined inflow channel luminal area represents an objective technique of stent sizing in comparison to the subjective techniques that currently exist.

Role of lower extremity fasciectomy plus fasciotomy for patients with persistent leg pain after stenting for chronic iliofemoral venous obstruction.

Although clinical improvement after stenting for symptomatic iliofemoral venous obstruction has been demonstrated in multiple large studies, a small proportion of patients will experience persistent quality of life–impairing symptoms. Swelling in such a setting represents the concomitant presence of lymphedema and will respond to treatment directed at the lymphedema. In contrast, persistent pain likely arises from venous hypertension in the lower leg, leading to the development of chronic compartment syndrome. Evaluation of intracompartmental pressures in such patients can help confirm the diagnosis, and fasciectomy combined with fasciotomy will treat the issue. In the present series, we evaluated six patients (six limbs) who had undergone fasciectomy combined with fasciotomy and their outcomes.

Comparison between a dedicated venous stent and standard composite Wallstent–Z stent approach to iliofemoral venous stenting: Intermediate-term outcomes

ObjectiveDedicated venous stents have not been used in the management of symptomatic chronic iliofemoral venous obstruction (CIVO) until recently. The Bard Venovo stent (Becton, Dickinson, and Co, Franklin Lakes, NJ) is one such stent noted to have an increased chronic outward force and radial resistive force compared with the Wallstent (Boston Scientific, Marlborough, MA). In the present study, we evaluated the outcomes following the use of the Bard Venovo stent vs a matched cohort of limbs that had undergone stenting with the Wallstent–Zenith (Z) stent (Cook Medical Inc, Bloomington, IN) composite configuration. MethodsA review of contemporaneously entered electronic medical record data for 167 patients (167 limbs) with initial iliofemoral stents placed from 2019 to 2020 for quality of life (QOL)-impairing CIVO that had failed conservative therapy was performed. The visual analog scale for pain score (score, 0-10), grade of swelling (score, 0-4), venous clinical severity score (score, 0-27), and the 20-item chronic venous insufficiency quality of life questionnaire instrument for QOL were evaluated before and after intervention to assess the effects of stenting. A Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to examine primary, primary-assisted and secondary stent patency, and analysis of variance with repeated measures was used to compare clinical outcomes. ResultsA total of 167 limbs had undergone Bard Venovo stenting (56 men and 111 women). Their median age was 61 years. The laterality was right and left in 70 and 97 limbs, respectively. Post-thrombotic syndrome was seen in 84 limbs and nonthrombotic iliac vein lesions/May-Thurner syndrome in 83 limbs. At 6 months, the venous clinical severity score had improved from 7 to 4 in the limbs with a unilateral Venovo (UV) stent and from 5 to 4 in the composite Wallstent–Z stent group (P = .9). The grade of swelling had improved from 3 to 1 in the UV group and from 3 to 1 in the composite group (P = .6), and the visual analog scale for pain score had improved from 7 to 2 in the UV group and from 5 to 0 in the composite group (P = .007). At 12 months, ulcers had healed in 53% (8 of 15) of the UV group and 56% (5 of 9) of the composite group (P = .7). The global 20-item chronic venous insufficiency quality of life questionnaire scores had improved from 58 to 28 in the UV group and from 59 to 40 in the composite group (P = .6). The cumulative primary, primary-assisted, and secondary patency at 18 months was 81%, 97%, and 98% in the UV group and 87%, 98%, and 100% in the composite group, respectively (P > .4). No difference in the reintervention rates was noted between the two groups (P = .5). ConclusionsFor patients who had undergone stenting for QOL-impairing CIVO, the results with the Bard Venovo venous stent were comparable to those with the composite Wallstent–Z stent configuration for clinical outcomes, QOL improvement, and stent patency. Further study is, however, required to confirm this improvement in the long term.

Iliofemoral venous configurations from three-dimensional computed tomography venogram and their relevance to stent design

ObjectiveIliofemoral venous stenting has become the standard of care for patients presenting with quality-of-life impairing symptoms of chronic iliofemoral venous obstruction not responding to conservative measures. This has led to an increased use of venous stenting over the last several years. However, iliofemoral venous anatomy in patients requiring such intervention remains poorly elucidated. This study attempts to fill that gap. MethodsTwenty-two consecutive patients with intravascular ultrasound examination-confirmed chronic iliofemoral venous obstruction underwent three-dimensional reconstruction of their computed tomography venogram images. Relevant angles, tortuosity (tort index-ratio between centerline length, and straight line length), lengths, and diameters were computed and analyzed. We used t tests for comparisons between the right and left sides. A P value of .05 or less was considered significant. ResultsOf the angles calculated, the median of the angles between the horizontal and common iliac vein (CIV) was 66° on the right and 60° on the left (P < .01). The median inferior vena cava-CIV angle was 172° on the right and 165° on the left (P < .0001). The CIV-EIV angle was 159° on the right and 151° on the L (P = .01). Overall, the median tortuosity was 1.07 on the right and 1.12 on the left (P = .007). The median centerline length of the CIV was 42mm on the right and 60mm on the left (P < .0001). The median external iliac vein length was 73 mm on the right and 88 mm on the left (P < .0001). The overall median iliac vein length was 220 mm on the right and 237 mm on the left (P < .01). The median diameters of the inferior vena cava at the iliocaval confluence, 20, 40, and 60 mm cranial to the confluence, were 23, 20, 22, and 23 mm, respectively. ConclusionsOverall, the left side has steeper angles, greater tortuosity, and longer lengths than the right side. These disparities should be considered during femoroiliocaval stent construction.

Comparison of intravascular ultrasound and magnetic resonance venography in the diagnosis of chronic iliac venous disease

BackgroundThe diagnosis of chronic iliofemoral venous obstruction (CIVO) can be made with several different modalities. Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) examination is the gold standard in the diagnosis of CIVO. However, being invasive, it should not be the initial examination to screen patients with CIVO. The aim of this report is to compare the performance of magnetic resonance venography (MRV) with IVUS examination in the diagnosis of CIVO. MethodsFrom January 2016 to December 2020, the records of all patients who underwent preoperative MRV and then IVUS in the evaluation of CIVO were analyzed retrospectively. ResultsThere were 505 patients who were evaluated by any modality for CIVO. Of these patients, 15% (78) were evaluated by MRV. Patients who had failed a trial of conservative therapy for at least 3 to 6 months and who had disabling and lifestyle-limiting symptoms of CIVO were selected to undergo further evaluation with MRV at the treating physician’s discretion. For inclusion in analysis, technically satisfactory IVUS examination and MRV data were mandatory. Data was available for 60 common iliac vein (CIV) segments and 61 external iliac vein (EIV) segments for comparative analysis after appropriate exclusions. The mean age of the patients was 56 ± 15 years. The male to female ratio was 1:2. The distribution of patients across different CEAP classes was as follows: CEAP 3, 28%; CEAP 4, 62%; CEAP 5, 2%; and CEAP 6, 8%. Bland-Altman plots of the mean difference in area between IVUS examination and MRI were 74.1% for CIV and 56.9% for EIV. The sensitivity of MRV was 93% and 100%, and the specificity was 0% and 50% for CIV and EIV, respectively. The positive predictive value was 93% and 86%; the negative predictive value was 0 and 50% for CIV and EIV, respectively. Improvement was noted in clinical parameters (Venous Clinical Severity Score, visual analog pain scale, and grade of swelling) after IVUS examination and stenting after MRV. For the Venous Clinical Severity Score, the score improved from 6.0 ± 2.7 (before the procedure) to 4 ± 2.7 (after the procedure) (P = .0001). ConclusionsThere is dimensional disparity between MRV and IVUS examination in the diagnosis of symptomatic CIVO. MRV has a high sensitivity but low specificity when compared with IVUS examination and overestimates the severity of the stenosis in both the EIV and CIV. MRV is not a reliable diagnostic tool for iliac vein stenosis and should not be used for the definitive disposition of patients with CIVO.

Clinical improvement after stenting for chronic iliofemoral venous obstruction: A review of large studies

Clinical improvement after stenting for chronic iliofemoral venous obstruction: A review of large studies

Iliofemoral venous stenting in patients with central neuromuscular disorders

BackgroundLeg swelling in patients with various central neuromuscular disorders is a common clinical scenario and can lead to significant morbidity. The aim of the present study was to evaluate a subset of patients with central neuromuscular disorders who had undergone iliofemoral venous stenting at a specialty venous clinic at a tertiary care hospital. MethodsFrom January 2000 to December 2020, the medical records of all patients with a known central neuromuscular disorder who had undergone iliofemoral venous stenting for chronic iliofemoral venous obstruction were retrospectively analyzed. ResultsA total of 42 patients (45 limbs) with central neuromuscular disorders had undergone iliofemoral stenting after failure of a trial of conservative therapy. The central neuromuscular disorders included Parkinson disease (n = 20 limbs), multiple sclerosis (n = 15 limbs), and other neuromuscular conditions (n = 10 limbs). The mean age of the sample was 59 ± 14 years. The ratio of post-thrombotic to nonthrombotic iliac vein lesions was 3:1. Most of the patients had had CEAP (clinical, etiologic, anatomic, pathophysiologic) class ≥C4 (64.4%); 25 limbs had a history of venous thromboembolism (56%). A trend was seen toward improvement in all clinical parameters measured (venous clinical severity score, visual analog scale for pain score, and edema grade) after stenting. An ulcer healing rate of ≤90% was noted after stenting. Of the 45 limbs, 24 had required some form of reintervention (53%) after initial stent placement. ConclusionsVenous intervention in the form of endovenous stenting was associated with improvement in the clinical parameters for patients with central neuromuscular disorders. However, these patients should be counseled regarding the relatively higher rate of reinterventions that might be required to correct residual or recurrent symptoms.

Effect of body mass index on initial presentation and outcomes after stenting for quality of life–impairing chronic iliofemoral venous obstruction

ObjectiveThe incidence of obesity has been increasing, with recent data indicating that the age-adjusted mean body mass index (BMI) is close to 30 kg/m2 in the United States. Prior studies have raised concerns for an increased incidence of chronic venous insufficiency in the obese population. We aimed to build on current knowledge by assessing the effects of BMI on the initial presentation and outcomes after intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) luminal area-guided stenting in patients presenting with quality of life (QOL)-impairing chronic iliofemoral venous obstruction (CIVO). MethodsA retrospective analysis of contemporaneously entered electronic medical record data on 464 continuous patients (464 limbs) with initial iliofemoral stents (2014-2017) for QOL-impairing CIVO was performed. The characteristics evaluated and compared included the degree of iliofemoral compression, CEAP (clinical, etiologic, anatomic, pathophysiologic) clinical class, venous clinical severity score (VCSS), grade of swelling (GOS), visual analog scale (VAS) for pain score, ulcer healing, reflux (venous segmental disease score; venous filling index-90), calf pump function (ejection fraction; residual volume fraction), and quality of life (CIVIQ-20 [chronic lower limb venous insufficiency 20-item questionnaire]) for those with a BMI <30 kg/m2 (group I) and a BMI ≥30 kg/m2 (group II). Paired and unpaired t tests were used for comparisons of the clinical variables and a Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to evaluate stent patency. ResultsOf the 464 limbs in the study cohort, 122 were in group I and 342 in group II. The median BMI was 26.3 kg/m2 (interquartile range, 19.6-29.9 kg/m2) in group I and 38.9 kg/m2 (interquartile range, 30.0-66.9 kg/m2) in group II. The IVUS luminal area–determined degree of compression was higher in group I than in group II across the common iliac, external iliac, and common femoral segments (P < .01). The supine foot venous and femoral venous pressures were higher in group II than in group I (P < .001). The ejection fraction was higher (57.4% vs 45.6%; P = .0008) and residual volume fraction was lower (27.5% vs 40.5%; P = .0008) in group II than in group I. Although the baseline VCSS and GOS were lower in group I than in group II (P < .05), no differences were found in the VAS for pain scores or ulcer prevalence. The median follow-up was 22 months. At 24 months after stenting, improvement was found in the VCSS, GOS, and VAS for pain score in both groups. The CIVIQ-20 QOL score had improved from 58.1 to 18.8 in group I (P = .0002) and from 60 to 37.5 in group II (P < .0001). At 5 years, primary patency was 70% in group I and 73% in group II (P = .6) and primary assisted patency was 100% in both groups (P = .99) without a significant difference in the reintervention rate (P = .5). ConclusionsObese patients with CIVO-impairing QOL have a lesser degree of iliofemoral venous stenosis, more severe venous hypertension, and better calf pump function than their nonobese counterparts. After stenting, no differences were found in the clinical, stent patency, or QOL-related outcomes between the two groups.

In-stent restenosis and stent compression following stenting for chronic iliofemoral venous obstruction

ObjectiveIn-stent restenosis (ISR) and stent compression (SC) are problems encountered after stenting for chronic iliofemoral venous obstruction that are responsible for a majority of reinterventions. However, characteristics of ISR and SC, in addition to outcomes after reintervention, have not been explored in detail and represent the focus of this study. MethodsA retrospective analysis of contemporaneously entered electronic medical record data on 578 limbs/patients with initial unilateral iliofemoral venous stents placed from 2014 to 2018 was performed. ISR was estimated from stent and flow channel diameters measured using duplex ultrasound. SC was estimated from rated stent diameter and actual stent diameter on duplex ultrasound. Characteristics evaluated included onset of ISR/SC after stent placement and progression over time. Analysis was performed to evaluate risk factors for the development of ISR and SC. Outcomes after reintervention for ISR/SC were also appraised. ResultsA total of 578 limbs underwent stenting for stenotic lesions (nonthrombotic iliac vein lesion/post-thrombotic syndrome). ISR was noted in 27% of limbs on post-intervention day 1. The prevalence of ISR increased to 74% by 3 months and stabilized thereafter. SC was noted in 80% of limbs on day 1 and plateaued. Of the variables evaluated as potential risk factors for ISR, intravascular ultrasound determined stent inflow luminal area and shear rate were found to be significant. For SC, asymmetric stent sizing was a significant risk factor. Over a median follow-up of 24 months, 95 of 578 (16.4%) limbs underwent reintervention for ISR, SC, or a combination. The median time to reintervention was 11 months. There was no statistically significant difference in the degree of ISR/SC among patients who underwent reintervention vs those who did not (P > .05). However, there was a statistically significant difference in the grade of swelling (P = .006) and visual analog scale pain scores (P < .0001) between those who underwent reintervention and those who did not. Primary, primary assisted, and secondary patencies at 60 months were 70%, 98%, and 84% after reintervention for ISR and 70%, 99%, and 84% for SC, respectively. ConclusionsAlthough ISR and SC are both common after stenting for chronic iliofemoral venous obstruction, neither are relentlessly progressive. Indication for reintervention must be a recurrence of symptoms with impairment of quality of life and not the percentage of ISR or degree of SC. After reintervention good outcomes can be expected both in terms of clinical improvement and stent patency. Further study of the impact of shear rate on stent flow is required to help reduce the incidence of ISR.

Utility of the 50% stenosis criterion for patients undergoing stenting for chronic iliofemoral venous obstruction

ObjectiveThe criterion for venous stenting in symptomatic chronic iliofemoral venous obstruction has been the arbitrary use of stenosis of ≥50%. In the present study, we evaluated the intravascular ultrasound (IVUS)-determined degree of stenosis in patients who had undergone stenting for quality of life (QOL)-impairing symptoms and assessed the utility of the 50% stenosis cutoff. MethodsA retrospective review of contemporaneously entered electronic medical record data from 480 continuous patients (480 limbs) with initial iliofemoral stents placed (2014 to 2017) for symptomatic chronic iliofemoral venous obstruction impairing their QOL was performed. The IVUS-determined normal minimal luminal areas for the common femoral vein (125 mm), external iliac vein (150 mm), and common iliac vein (200 mm) were used to group limbs as having <50% (low-grade stenosis [LGS]) or ≥50% (high-grade stenosis [HGS]) stenosis. The variables compared included the visual analog scale (VAS) for pain score, venous clinical severity score (VCSS; range, 0-27), ulcer healing, supine foot venous pressures, QOL (20-item chronic venous disease QOL questionnaire), and stent patency. A composite chronic venous insufficiency score (CCVIS) incorporating the VAS score, VCSS, and CIVIQ-20 score for predicting improvement after stenting was evaluated. ResultsOf the 480 limbs, 283 and 197 were in the LGS and HGS groups, respectively. A preponderance of women, left laterality, and post-thrombotic syndrome were noted in both groups. At baseline, although no difference was found in the VAS for pain score between groups, the LGS group had a higher VCSS than did the HGS group (P = .05). The baseline median supine foot venous pressure was 15 and 14 mm Hg in the LGS and HGS groups, respectively (P = .17). At 24 months after stenting, the mean VCSS had improved from 6.3 to 4.4 (P < .0001) and from 5.7 to 3.7 (P < .0001) in the LGS and HGS groups, respectively, without significant differences between the two groups (P = .07). A greater prevalence of ulcers was found in the LGS group (18% vs 11%; P = .04), with no differences in healing (P = .41) or recurrence rates (P = .36). The QOL scores had improved in both groups (LGS, from 58 to 37 [P < .0001]; HGS, from 61 to 35 [P < .0001]), without differences between the two groups (P > .3). No significant differences in stent patency or reinterventions rates were found. A baseline CCVIS of ≥84.5, ≥86.9, or ≥105.3 was needed for a 30-, 40-, and 50-point improvement in most limbs after stenting. ConclusionsThe degree of IVUS-determined iliofemoral venous stenosis did not appear to affect the initial clinical presentation, CEAP (clinical, etiologic, anatomic, pathophysiologic) clinical class, supine foot venous pressure, clinical improvement, QOL improvement, stent patency, or reintervention rates after stenting. Patients presenting with QOL-impairing symptoms in whom conservative treatment has failed merit consideration of correction of their obstruction even if the degree of stenosis is <50%. The use of a CCVIS might be helpful but requires further study.

Clinical Outcomes of Stenting Extending Below the Inguinal Ligament for Treatment of Chronic Iliofemoral Venous Obstruction

Patients with chronic iliofemoral venous obstructive lesions that often require stenting extending below the inguinal ligament. However, the issue of stents crossing the inguinal ligament is currently controversial. Some guidelines suggest that it should be avoided, and some guidelines suggest that in order to ensure adequate flow, the inguinal ligament can be crossed if necessary. The aim of this study was to evaluate the technical aspects and examine patency rates of stent placement across the inguinal ligament for managing iliofemoral venous obstruction. A retrospective analysis of 127 patients with chronic iliofemoral venous obstruction were treated with interventional surgery in a single institution from January 2012 to January 2018 was conducted. All patients underwent balloon dilatation and placement of at least 2 stents extending below inguinal ligament. Inflow condition, technical success, operation duration, stent patency rates, anticoagulant selection and duration, and complications were recorded after the interventions. The technical success rate was 100%. No major perioperative complications occurred. The mean number of stents was 2.14 ± 0.37. Follow up periods ranged from 12 to 60 months (28.79 ± 10.90 months). Overall cumulative primary, assisted primary, and secondary stent patency rates were 81.9%, 90.5%, and 92.9% at 12 months and 70.4%, 80.9%, and 86.0% at 24 months, and 64.2%, 72.3%, and 74.3% at 36months, respectively. Cumulative patency rates at 12 months, 24 months and 36 months were significantly greater in the patients with "good" inflow as compared to "fair" inflow. The symptoms of all patients improved. None of the stents were compressed, fractured or migrated. Stenting across the inguinal ligament for treatment of the patients with chronic iliofemoral venous obstruction was a feasible and safe treatment with good patency and clinical results in short and midterm follow up, and stents with good inflow have better patency.

Role of laser ablation in recalcitrant instent restenosis post iliofemoral venous stenting.

Instent restenosis (ISR) represents the most common reason for recurrent symptoms requiring reintervention in patients who have undergone venous stenting for chronic iliofemoral venous obstruction. Treatment of ISR requires stent angioplasty typically using angioplasty balloons equal to or larger than the rated diameter of the stent. At times this does not yield the required result, and in these patients, utilization of a laser catheter supported by an angled sheath is helpful to ablate the ISR or make it more amenable to repeat balloon angioplasty. The authors report their experience with this technique for 18 patients with recurrent symptoms impacting quality of life as a result of recalcitrant ISR in this retrospective review of contemporaneously entered electronic medical record data. 12 (67%) limbs underwent laser ablation only, while 6 (33%) limbs underwent additional angioplasty post laser ablation. Post intervention for ISR, at 12 months, the venous clinical severity score improved from 5 to 3.5 (P = .0005) and the VAS pain score went from 7 to 5 (P = .0005). At 10 months, primary patency was 87% and primary assisted patency was 100%. There were no stent occlusions. Laser ablation of recalcitrant instent restenosis in patients presenting with recurrent chronic iliac venous obstruction post iliofemoral venous stenting is a safe and effective option. Corroboration from larger studies is warranted.