“Many authors assure us that mental alienation is epidemic. It is certain that there are years when, independently of moral causes, insanity seems snddenly to extend to a great number of individuals” Esquirol, 1845 The roles of nature and nurture as determinants of human behaviour have been grist for philosophers for millennia. For much of the twentieth century infectious diseases captured the popular imagination with the hope that vaccines and antibiotics would provide cures not only for diseases clearly due to microbes such as poliomyelitis, rabies, and syphilis, but also for chronic brain disorders of unknown pathogenesis such as multiple sclerosis, depression, and schizophrenia. Proponents of infectious bases for these disorders have cited such evidence as discordance for disease in monozygotic twins (schizophrenia). increased prevalence with distance from the equator (schizophrenia and multiple sclerosis), and preponderance of second-trimester matemal exposure to respiratory tract infections, particularly influenza (autism, schizophrenia). More recently, we became enamoured with the notion that panaceas will arise through genome projects. Frustration with the ability to move beyond simple allelic Van Gogh: infected with microbes? associations to genetic causation has led to models based on interactions of genes. Although such models are plausible, it is reasonable to reintroduce the environment into the equation. As with most complex dialectics, the answers are likely to be found in synthesis: susceptibility genes coupled with environmental factors such as infectious agents, toxins, and psychosocial stressors. Most people would agree that if the relationship between any microbial agents and schizophrenia, affective disorders, or multiple sclerosis were elementary, the influence of such environmental factors on disease expression should already be apparent. A number of scenarios have been proposed to explain the difficulties in apprehending specific microbes through routine strategies for pathogen detection: low-level persistence in neural tissues, “hit-and-run” mechanisms, or indirect effects of pathogens through mechanisms such as molecular mimicry, where immune responses to an agent cross-react with normal host tissues to cause disease. Alternatively, environmental factors might also be inappropriately dismissed in cases where a wide variety of pathogens, neurotoxins, or general stressors induce nonspecific damage through elaboration of cellular or soluble immune mediators that lead to a final common pathway resulting in immediate or delayed brain dysfunction. The advent of molecular tools for detecting microbial footprints, such as subtractive cloning, polymerase chain reaction, and in-situ hybridisation, and also of methods for defining targets of immune responses, has rekindled interest in the search for a role of pathogens in idiopathic brain disorders. Examples include proposed linkages between multiple sclerosis and human herpes virus 6 or retroviruses, Alzheimer's disease and herpes simplex virus 1 in patients having the type 4 allele of the apolipoprotein E gene, E gene, neuropsychiatric disorders (major depression, bipolar disorder, schizophrenia, or chronic fatigue syndrome) and Bornaviruses, and paediatric obsessive-compulsive disorder and streptococci. Although intriguing, none of these relationships is established either as causative or as associative; however, each remains open and controversial despite ongoing investigation. Indeed, clinical trials are in progress for antimicrobial treatment of some of these disorders based on what many would consider to be only preliminary data. It is clear that neither Koch's postulates nor an updated facsimile inclusive of molecular technology will serve us here. The new era of microbial neuropathogenesis will require teams of diagnosticians, microbiologists, immunologists, geneticists, developmental neurobiologists, and epidemiologists who appreciate the complexity of host:microbe interactions and their implications for brain dysfunction.
Read full abstract