Chromotropic Acid Method Research Articles

Hidden formaldehyde in cosmetic products.

Formaldehyde is a common cause of contact allergy. Hidden formaldehyde, that is, formaldehyde in products without formaldehyde releasers, has previously been detected in cosmetic products. The objective of this study was to investigate the content and causes of hidden formaldehyde in leave-on cosmetic products. The formaldehyde release from 142 cosmetic products, primarily creams, was analysed using the chromotropic acid (CA) method. The study included 130 products with no formaldehyde releasers on the ingredient list and 12 products with formaldehyde releasers. Products without formaldehyde releasers positive to CA, that is, with formaldehyde ≥2.5 ppm, were additionally analysed using high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). Formaldehyde release from selected raw materials and packaging were also investigated. Hidden formaldehyde was found in 23 of the 130 products (18%) without formaldehyde releasers on the ingredient list. The average formaldehyde content was 105 ppm (range: 0.5-507 ppm) in products with hidden formaldehyde and 355 ppm (range: 75-637 ppm) in eight products with formaldehyde releasers, selected for HPLC analysis. Impurities of formaldehyde in dihydroxyacetone may be a cause of hidden formaldehyde in self-tanners. No clear pattern was found for the other products with hidden formaldehyde. Changes in regulation are needed to prevent allergic contact dermatitis from hidden formaldehyde in cosmetic products.

Negative formaldehyde release from textiles washed with a formaldehyde-containing laundry soap according to manufacturer instructions: An application of chromotropic acid testing.

Formaldehyde is a common preservative used to prevent microbial growth in water. It can be found in personal care products and household cleaning products, including laundry detergents. Formaldehyde has frequently been recognised as a cause of allergic contact dermatitis, but whether it remains present in textiles washed with formaldehyde-containing laundry detergents is unknown. This study aimed to utilise the chromotropic acid method (CAM) to assess formaldehyde release from textiles washed with a laundry detergent known to contain formaldehyde. Textiles were laundered with a detergent containing calcium formate at four concentrations (0×, 0.5×, 1× and 5× the recommended amount per manufacturer label) and kept wet or allowed to dry. Select textiles were subjected to an additional rinse cycle. Textiles were then tested utilising the CAM. A sample of the pure laundry detergent was also tested using the CAM. The CAM was positive only for wet textiles washed at 5× the recommended concentration of detergent and pure detergent. All dry textiles were negative. Formaldehyde release was not detected from any textiles washed following the manufacturer's recommendations. Once dry, it is likely safe for formaldehyde-allergic patients to wear textiles washed with formaldehyde-containing detergents.

Evaluating new simplified assays for harm reduction from methanol poisoning using chromotropic acid kits: An analytical study on Indian and Iranian alcoholic beverages.

Ingestion of methanol can result in severe irreversible morbidity, and death. Simple and easy methods to detect methanol and other hazardous additives prior to consumption can prevent fatalities. This form of harm reduction is analogous to the widely practiced "pill testing" of recreational drugs in various countries. We aimed to evaluate the performance of two qualitative and quantitative kits to simultaneously identify the presence of methanol and formaldehyde in alcoholic beverages, and compare this to the standard gas chromatographic (GC) method. Two-hundred samples of Indian and Iranian alcoholic drinks were examined by two new qualitative and quantitative chemical kits designed based on a modified chromotropic acid (CA) method, as well as a gold standard GC method. Methanol levels were similar when evaluated by GC and quantitative method (Z = - 0.328, p = 0.743). The 75th percentile of methanol level detection was 4,290 mg L-1 (range; 0-83,132) using GC compared to that of 4,671 mg L-1 (range; 0-84,960) using the qualitative kit (predefined color intensity reflecting the methanol/ethanol ratio). The quantitative kit was able to detect all methanol-contaminated and non-contaminated samples (110 and 60 cases, respectively: 100% sensitivity). In 25 samples, GC analysis showed no methanol; but the qualitative kit detected possible toxic substances. Formaldehyde measurement by UV/Vis analysis showed the presence of formaldehyde in 23 samples (92%) with a median 912 [IQR 249, 2,109; range 112-2,742] mg L-1. Methanol and formaldehyde can be easily detected using these simple CA chemical kits. Qualitative positive results may indicate the risk of poisoning if the beverage is consumed. CA kits can be used in community setting by public health units and community organizations to monitor for methanol contamination and inform a public health response to reduce methanol-related harms to the public.

33207 Formaldehyde release from eyelash glues: Chromotropic acid method analysis

Formaldehyde and formaldehyde-releasing chemicals can be found in consumer products due to its excellent preservative properties. Formaldehyde is a common allergen implicated in allergic contact dermatitis. The North American Contact Dermatitis Group highlighted a 7.4% prevalence of positive patch test reactions to formaldehyde, making it the fifth most frequent allergen. There has been a recent spike in eyelash extension popularity, but reports of acrylate allergies and formaldehyde in professional eyelash adhesives may limit users who then seek alternative options.

Formaldehyde in Electronic Cigarette Liquid (Aerosolized Liquid).

Aerosolized liquid (e-liquid) of electronic cigarettes can be toxic. Beyond the solvent (propylene glycol, vegetable glycerin) and nicotine, little is known about the liquid composition. Formaldehyde, a carcinogen and source of contact dermatitis, has been reported in the vaporized e-liquid, but no studies have assessed the actual e-liquid. The aim of the study was to evaluate e-liquid products for the presence of formaldehyde. Sixteen e-liquid products were purchased and analyzed for the release of formaldehyde using the chromotropic acid method of detection. Of the 16 e-liquids purchased, 4 (25%) were positive for the presence of formaldehyde; 2 were flavored and 2 were nonflavored. All positive e-liquids were in pods or disposable electronic cigarette devices, and 2 were purchased from local vape shops. The average nicotine content in the positive e-liquids was 3.85% versus 4.03% in the negative e-liquids. The e-liquid products contain toxic chemicals not declared on product labels, as shown in this study with 25.0% of e-liquids containing formaldehyde. All positive e-liquids were within pods or disposable devices. Continued analysis of e-liquids and increased product regulation are needed.

Formaldehyde Release From Eyelash Glues: Analysis Using the Chromotropic Acid Method.

Popularity of eyelash enhancements has increased dramatically. Eyelash enhancements are available as an over-the-counter consumer product with glue included and as a professional product where proprietary glues are typically used. Both types of eyelash extension glues may release formaldehyde despite not being declared as an ingredient. Although formaldehyde is a carcinogen and may cause allergic contact dermatitis, few studies have assessed its presence in eyelash glues. The aim of the study was to evaluate professional and consumer eyelash glues for the presence of formaldehyde using the chromotropic acid method (CAM). A total of 37 eyelash glues were evaluated: 17 consumer eyelash glues (2 of which declared formaldehyde) and 20 professional eyelash glues (none of which declared formaldehyde) were purchased and analyzed with the CAM of testing. For consumer eyelash glues, the 2 glues that declared formaldehyde were positive on CAM testing as well as 2 glues (13.3% [2/15]) that did not declare formaldehyde. Of the 20 professional eyelash glues, 15 (75.0%) were positive for formaldehyde. Some consumer eyelash glues and most professional eyelash glues released formaldehyde when evaluated with CAM. Patients and clinicians should be aware that both consumer and professional eyelash glues can be sources of formaldehyde.

Identification of formaldehyde in groundwater using UV-Vis spectrometer

This research aims to identify the concentration of formaldehyde in groundwater by using UV-Vis spectrophotometer and to assess the physico-chemical parameters of water quality in groundwater. The samples were collected from a cemetery of Kampung Darat Demit, Kubang Kerian, Kota Bharu where the formalin-based specimen/pathological waste was buried. The unknown concentration of the formaldehyde was determined by using chromotropic acid method for the analysis of formaldehyde. A calibration curve was prepared with six different concentrations to determine the unknown concentration of formaldehyde in the samples. Seven parameters of water quality were analyzed using respective methods and the relationship with the presence of formaldehyde in water were discussed. By using the National Water Quality Standard (NWQS) of Malaysia 2008 the class of water for all samples were determined. A statistical study of one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) was conducted using SPSS 20th version software. The results showed the different concentration of formaldehyde found in all four samples for four consecutive weeks. The classes of water samples for each physical-chemical parameter vary and in range between Class II and III. The presence of formaldehyde in water may has significant effect on the water quality parameters physically, biological and chemically.

Formaldehyde Release From Predispersed Tattoo Inks: Analysis Using the Chromotropic Acid Method.

Allergic contact dermatitis to tattoo ink may last from weeks to years. Formaldehyde is a strong sensitizer that may be present in predispersed tattoo inks. The aim of this study was to evaluate the presence of formaldehyde in predispersed tattoo inks using the chromotropic acid method. Tattoo inks from 39 companies were evaluated. Inclusion criteria included availability to purchase inks online through US tattoo product wholesalers or individual Web sites. Brands were grouped based on prevalence of use: common, uncommon, or rare. For common brands, 8 colors (primary colors, secondary colors, black, and white) were purchased. For uncommon and rare brands, 5 colors (primary colors, black, and white) were purchased. Each ink was tested with standard chromotropic acid method procedures; concentration of formaldehyde released was quantified using spectrophotometry. In total, 127 tattoo inks were purchased and tested. Ninety-three (73%) tested positive for formaldehyde release; 34 (27%) tested negative. Formaldehyde release did not correlate with color or brand. At least 1 ink from all brands (except 1) was positive for formaldehyde release. Approximately three-quarters of selected US tattoo inks tested positive for formaldehyde release. Clinicians should be aware of tattoo ink as a potential source of formaldehyde.

Quantification of Some Herbal Distillates’ Methanol to Evaluate a New Diagnostic Kit

Methanol naturally exists in all plant products. In recent years, the consumption of certain kinds of herbal distillates has led to blurred vision, leading to neurotic blindness in Iran. The advanced methods needed for determination of methanol are not available in all parts of poor and developing countries. In this study, we evaluated some herbal distillates’ methanol with a new kit compared to gas chromatography for determining the efficacy of the kit. A gas chromatography apparatus was used to determine methanol concentration of 57 herbal distillates. At the same time, a spectrophotometer device was also used along with a newly designed kit based on the modified chromotropic acid method for the same purpose. All examined samples have different amounts of methanol from 21 to 770 mg/l. The methanol content of all samples was higher than the used kit’s limit of quantification (5 mg/l). The attained results by two used methods were very close together in both minimum (21 and 22 mg/l) and maximum (770 and 690 mg/l) amounts. The comparison of results was shown, and some of available herbal distillates in Iran have enough amounts of methanol to create chronic type of methanol poisoning. Our results suggested that the used kit had suitable efficacy for quantitative determination of herbal distillates’ methanol content. It was proved that the type of the herbal distillate did not affect the kit’s function. The new kit can be easily used with minimal equipment for quality control of herbal distillates in food industry area.

Evaluation of methanol content of illegal beverages using GC and an easier modified Chromotropic acid method; a cross sectional study

BackgroundMethanol is highly toxic to human beings and naturally exists in some beverages. Having access to an easy and cheap method for its determination is of great importance to increase the safety of use of these beverages. Our main aim is to evaluate methanol concentration of some alcoholic beverages in Iran black market and compare it with the European and US standards. Also, we evaluated the efficacy of a newly designed and produced chemical kit in determining the risk of methanol toxicity by drinking of such samples compared to gas chromatography method.MethodsMethanol content of suspected alcoholic beverages referred to forensic toxicology laboratory, Guilan province, Iran was measured using gas chromatography and a recently designed kit based on modified colorimetric chromotropic acid method.ResultsOf 1221 samples, 145 (11.9%) had no ethanol content, while in three samples (0.25%), methanol was high enough (700,000; 870,000; 920,000 mg/L) to cause severe methanol toxicity. Median [IQR] ethanol content of the suspected samples was 9% [3.7, 32.75]. Methanol was detected in 128 (10.48%) samples using gas chromatography method and 160 samples (13.1%) with designed kit with 100% sensitivity, 97.07% specificity, and 100% negative-predictive-value.ConclusionsAlcoholic beverages produced in local black market in Iran are not safe at all. The application of the new method is practical, rapid, easy, and accurate to evaluate the risk of methanol toxicity in suspected alcoholic drinks.

Formaldehyde in "Nontoxic" Nail Polish.

Nail polish is known to contain potentially hazardous chemicals that have been linked to adverse health effects after overexposure. Formaldehyde is used as an antimicrobial, preservative, and nail hardener in select nail products, yet it is a recognized carcinogen and potent allergen in allergic contact dermatitis. The aim of this study was to investigate whether formaldehyde is present in nail polishes marketed as formaldehyde-free. Twenty-nine cosmetic nail polishes were purchased for analysis; of these, 28 were advertised as formaldehyde-free and/or did not declare formaldehyde in their ingredient lists. Initial testing was pursued using the chromotropic acid method, which uses a red-purple color change to indicate the presence of formaldehyde. Products were subsequently analyzed at least twice using high-performance liquid chromatography, quantifying formaldehyde amount above the detection limit of 2 ppm. High-performance liquid chromatography analysis found 5 of 29 products containing formaldehyde, 4 of which were advertised as formaldehyde-free. All other products were negative for formaldehyde (<2 ppm). Further investigation is warranted among brands testing positive and whether multiple products within the same line contain formaldehyde. Nail products must be labeled appropriately to avoid adverse reactions among individuals with cutaneous sensitivities.

Formaldehyde Release From Clothing and Upholstery Fabrics Using the Chromotropic Acid Method

Formaldehyde resins may be used in textiles. The aim of the study was to investigate the presence of formaldehyde in textiles using the chromotropic acid method. Clothing scraps (from local department store tailors, n = 77) and upholstery fabric cuttings (from a furniture reupholstery store, n = 22) were collected. Each fabric was cut into a 1-cm square and tested using the chromotropic acid method. Samples were retested in a systematic fashion (every 10th sample) to assess reproducibility. All 99 clothing and upholstery fabrics tested negative for formaldehyde release. Our study suggests that textile manufactures may be using nonformaldehyde resins for durable press finishing in clothing likely to be tailored as well as fabrics used for furniture reupholstery. Additional studies involving other metropolitan areas and a variety of fabrics are needed to confirm these findings.

Formaldehyde Release From Baby Wipes: Analysis Using the Chromotropic Acid Method

Formaldehyde is a common preservative and strong sensitizer. The aim of the study was to evaluate the release of formaldehyde from baby/toddler wet wipes using the chromotropic acid method (CAM). An online search of best-selling baby wipes was conducted. None declared formaldehyde or formaldehyde-releasing preservatives. Standard CAM procedures were used: a 1 × 1-in square of fresh wipe was placed in a bottle with an open vial of 4 mg/1 mL of chromotropic acid and sulfuric acid solution, sealed, and stored for 48 hours. Formalin and water served as controls. A blinded investigator graded color change (negative, indeterminate, mild, moderate, or strong). For quality control, 20% of all samples as well as all positives were retested. Fifty-one popular and highly reviewed baby and toddler wet wipe products were tested using CAM. Twelve wipes (24%) released formaldehyde (8 mild, 4 moderate/strong). Chromotropic acid method testing of 9 wipes (18%) was indeterminate and 30 (59%) were negative. Almost one quarter of baby/toddler wet wipes released formaldehyde when evaluated with CAM. Patients and clinicians should be aware of this potentially undeclared source of this common allergen.

Introducing a New Kit based on Modified Chromotropic Acid Method for Easy Determination of Methanol

Methyl alcohol poisoning usually happens by use of contaminated ethanol. So, development of an easy and cost-effective method to determine methanol in these products can be helpful to diagnosemethanolintoxication. The aim of this paper is introducing a new kit based on chromotropic acid method for measuring the methanol content of alcoholic beverages. In this study, a new modified chromotropic acid method (as a kit) was used to determine of methanol in 700 self-made samples with diverse ethanol concentration prepared by "add found" technique. Briefly, in the proposed method, produced formaldehyde by methanol oxidation is reacted with chromotropic acid in a high acidic media. The quantification limit of this kit lies below the permitted dose and safe amount of methanol in the beverages regulated by the European Parliament and the Council. The attained results indicate Limit of Quantification of the method is1250 mg/Land all examined samples with more methanol amounts are easily determined with good accuracy and precision. As for the European standard about permitted dose of methanol in beverages (up to 4000 mg/lin 40% v/v of alcohol strength) and gained results, it seems, this proposed method practically enables rapid and easy quantitative determination of methanol in all kind of alcoholic strength with suitable accuracy and precision. However, conclusive conclusions in this area will require further examination in actual samples of alcoholic beverages. But, to the best of our knowledge, there isn’t any report about such easy method.

Formaldehyde Release From Personal Care Products: Chromotropic Acid Method Analysis.

Preservatives such as formaldehyde and formaldehyde releasers (F/FRs) are found in personal care products. Studies from Europe and Israel have indicated that products with undeclared F/FRs on product labels may have detectable levels of formaldehyde. The aim of the study was to determine the presence of formaldehyde in samples of US personal care products. Fifty-four baby and adult products were tested with the chromotropic acid method. A blinded investigator graded the color change as mild, moderate, or strong. All 8 products declaring F/FRs resulted in a deep purple color change, indicating a strong reaction. Of the 46 products with undeclared F/FRs, 4 (8.6%) were found to release formaldehyde. All 4 resulted in a light purple color change, indicating a mild reaction. Overall, 4 of 54 products (7.4%) had label information, which did not match chromotropic acid method testing results. Clinicians and formaldehyde-allergic individuals should be aware of the limitations of product ingredient labeling in managing allergic contact dermatitis to formaldehyde.

Rapid Determination of Methanol In Herbaceous Distillates For Their Safety Evaluation by A New Modified Chromotropic Acid Method.

All sophisticated methods for direct determination of methanol require advanced instruments and high technical knowledge whose preparing them is very expensive in none developed and developing countries. This work reports a simple and efficient qualitative technique for semi determination of methanol content in herbal distillates by a new modified chromotropic acid method. The technique is based on the indirect detection of methanol after its oxidation and transforming to formaldehyde by chromotropic acid (formaldehyde specific color indicator). To measure methanol level in herbal distillates, a water diluted sample was mixed with 50 µL of sulfuric acid and potassium permanganate and after 5 min, followed by addition sodium bi-sulfite, chromotropic acid, and concentrated sulfuric acid in two separated steps and finally, eye comparing with four color standard tubes which gives a range of amount of methanol in the sample. The method has a good precision and accuracy and its Limit of Detection is 25 mgL-1. It is particularly suitable for semi quantitative measurement of methanol in herbal distillates not only in the production process quality control of workshops or small companies with no laboratory equipment and adequate financial properties but also the quality check of point of-sale samples from commercial markets. To the best of our knowledge, there isn’t any report about such method.

ANALYTICAL METHOD DEVELOPMENT FOR THE ESTIMATION OF DARUNAVIR BY DIAZOTIZATION AND COUPLING BY VISIBLE SPECTROPHOTOMETRY

Objectives: This proposed work describes simple and extraction free visible methods for the estimation of darunavir ethanolate (DNV) in bulk and tablet formulations. The methodology involves diazotization of DNV with nitrous acid followed by coupling with chromotropic acid (CA) (Method A)/ Bratton Marshall Reagent (Method B)/α-naphthol (Method C) to form colored products.Methods: All the methods were developed using a PerkinElmer (LAMBDA 25) UV–Visible spectrophotometer interfaced with UV Win lab software and 1 cm quartz cells. Results: Spectrophotometrically, DNV is estimated at 520 nm, 544 nm, and 464 nm for the reddish-pink color produced by CA, dark violet color with NED, and dark-greenish yellow with α-naphthol, respectively. The linear relationship was observed between absorbance and the corresponding concentration of drug in the range of 100–350 μg/mL, 10–100 μg/mL, and 10–60 μg/mL for Methods A, B, and C, respectively.Conclusion: The colorimetric methods were extensively validated as per the ICH guidelines. The developed methods were proven to be more accurate and precise by the statistical analysis.

The Presence of Methanol in Alcoholic Beverages Analyzed Using Qualitative Method

An alcoholic beverage contains ethyl alcohol or ethanol (C2H5OH)that is produced from fermentation or distillation of sugars. In many cases, either producers or consumers add ethanol with denaturated alcohol containing methanol (CH3OH) as an additive. Methanol can cause blindness and induce comas, and it is deadly in high doses. This study aimed at investigating the presence of methanol or methyl alcohol in alcoholic beverages sold in Palembang, Indonesia. Seventeen samples collected from small shops and supermarkets were taken by accidental sampling. A chromotropic acid method was used to examine the presence of methanol. The results showed that there were 18% of the samples was positive, and 82% was negative. Based on alcohol content, the research showed that all (100%) samples of group A were negative; 33% of group B was positive, and 33% of group C was positive. The study indicated that methanol was still present in alcoholic drinks sold in markets. The government should inform the society that denatured alcohol contains methanol and, therefore, should not be feasible to consume.

Evaluation of methanol content of beverages using an easy modified chromotropic acid method

Evaluation of methanol content of beverages using an easy modified chromotropic acid method

Skincare products containing low concentrations of formaldehyde detected by the chromotropic acid method cannot be safely used in formaldehyde-allergic patients.

Formaldehyde is a well-known contact sensitizer. Formaldehyde releasers are widely used preservatives in skincare products. It has been found that formaldehyde at concentrations allowed by the European Cosmetics Directive can cause allergic contact dermatitis. However, we still lack information on whether formaldehyde at low concentrations affects dermatitis in formaldehyde-allergic individuals. To study the effects of low concentrations of formaldehyde on irritant contact dermatitis in formaldehyde-allergic individuals. Fifteen formaldehyde-allergic individuals and a control group of 12 individuals without contact allergy to formaldehyde and formaldehyde releasers were included in the study. The individuals performed the repeated open application test (ROAT) during 4weeks with four different moisturizers releasing formaldehyde in concentrations that had been determined as >40, 20-40, 2·5-10 and 0p.p.m. by the chromotropic acid (CA) spot test. Dimethyloldimethylhydantoin was used as a formaldehyde releaser in the moisturizers. The ROAT was performed on areas of experimentally induced sodium lauryl sulfate dermatitis. The study was double blind, controlled and randomized. Nine of the 15 formaldehyde-allergic individuals had reappearance or worsening of dermatitis on the areas that were treated with moisturizers containing formaldehyde. No such reactions were observed in the control group (P<0·001) or for the moisturizers without formaldehyde in the formaldehyde-allergic individuals (P<0·001). Our results demonstrate that the low concentrations of formaldehyde often found in skincare products by the CA method are sufficient to worsen an existing dermatitis in formaldehyde-allergic individuals.