The aerial part of Artemisia semiarida (Krasch. et Lavr.) Filat. was collected in May 2009 in Betpak-Dala desert in Zhanaarka District, Karagandy Province, during the vegetative phase in order to study its chemical composition. Finely ground aerial part was extracted with CHCl3. The resulting extract was worked up with EtOH:H2O (2:1) at 70–75°C. The filtrate was extracted with CHCl3. Total extracted substances were mixed with KSK silica gel and transferred to a chromatography column (total:sorbent, 1:19) and eluted with petroleum ether:EtOAc (13:7) to afford yellow crystalline 1, mp 234–237°C (EtOAc), C18H16O7, Rf 2.25 (EtOAc:petroleum ether, 1:1). Elution by petroleum ether:EtOAc (63:37) isolated yellow crystalline 2, mp 244–247°C (EtOH), C18H16O8, Rf 0.19 (EtOAc:petroleum ether, 2:1). Compound 1 was identified by its spectral properties as 5,7-dihydroxy-6,3 ,4 -trimethoxyflavone or eupatilin, which was previously isolated from Eupatorium semiserratum DC. [1]; compound 2, as 5,7,3 -trihydroxy-6,4 ,5 -trimethoxyflavone, which was previously isolated from Artemisia frigida Willd. [2]. The molecular structure of 2 (Fig. 1) was determined by an x-ray crystal structure analysis. Flavones are the flavonoids with the least conformational flexibility because of many factors that hinder movement of the atoms in the molecule. Thus, the chromene skeleton of 2 was flat within ±0.01 A° . The closest hydroxyl and methoxyl O atoms lay practically in the plane of the main framework. The phenyl ring was planar within ±0.010 A° . The methoxyl C8 was also located in the plane of the phenyl ring (torsion angle C4 C5 O3 C8 , –175.5°). The other two methoxyls were twisted by significant angles (torsion angles C5C6O4C11, 87.5°; C3 C4 O2 C7 , 121.3°). The phenyl ring was rotated insignificantly by 6.0° relative to the chromene skeleton, like in the majority of flavones, e.g., 5-hydroxy-6,7,4 -trimethoxyflavone [3] and 5,6,7-trihydroxyflavone [4]. Organic molecules in the crystal may not be situated in the most energetically favorable conformation if it is advantageous to change because of packing-density effects [5]. Therefore, quantum-chemical calculations by the semi-empirical AM1 method [6] with rotation of the phenyl ring around the C2–C1 bond were performed in order to determine the possible conformations of 1 and 2. Possible orientations of the methoxyl relative to the main skeleton were determined. Because the chromene skeleton in flavones is rigid, the various conformations can be realized primarily by rotating the phenyl ring around the C2–C1 bond. The calculations indicated that four conformations with different rotations of the phenyl ring and torsion angles (O1C2C1 C2 ) = 30 and 20, 140 and 140, 210 and 200, and 320 and 310°, respectively, with small energy barriers (~2 kcal/mol) were possible for isolated 1 and 2. Similar rotations of a phenyl ring relative to a chromene skeleton were observed, e.g., in 6-hydroxy-1 ,2,3 -trimethoxyflavone [ (O1C2C1 C2 ) = 161.3°] [7]; 5,4 -dihydroxy-6,7dimethoxyflavone [ (O1C2C1 C2 ) = 337.8°] [8]; 6,1 -dihydroxyflavone [ (O1C2C1 C2 ) = 142.4°] [9], and 5,6,7,4 tetramethoxyflavone [ (O1C2C1 C2 ) = 18.3°] [10]. Furthermore, possible orientations of the methoxyl relative to the main skeleton were determined. The orientations of the methoxyl on the chromene skeletons of 1 and 2 were analogous and gave methoxyl positions with torsion angles (C5C6O4C11) of 70 and 270°. The methoxyls of the phenyl ring of 1 adopted a favorable position with (C2 C3 O2 C7 ) and (C3 C4 O3 C8 ) in the range from –80 to 180°. The methoxyls of the phenyl ring of 2 adopted a favorable position with (C3 C4 O2 C7 ) of 40, 70, 140, 240, and 290° and (C4 C5 O3 C8 ) in the range from –80 to 180°. This difference in the conformational behavior of the methoxyls in the different positions was explained by the different closest environment of these groups. In fact, the methoxyls could adopt any conformation over broad limits if there was no bulky neighboring substituent.
Read full abstract