Mark Gignilliat offers a helpful addition to the (long overdue) growing literature toward reading Scripture canonically as the church and within and for the church. Of particular concern, specifically addressed by Gignilliat, is a Christian canonical reading of the OT. The need for such an introductory work on reading the OT within the Christian tradition(s) is paramount to a faithful hearing of Scripture as God’s self-revelation and redemption (p. 4). This volume demonstrates the rich developments from the earlier works of Brevard Childs that found fertile ground with the maturing works of Christopher Seitz (Gignilliat’s Doktorvater and of whom attentive readers can hear echoes in the present volume).Gignilliat opens by pointing to the self-affirming canonical consciousness internal to the texts of Scripture themselves, with the external affirmation of canonicity by the community God’s people (Israel and the church) only later (pp. 7, 48). This representation of the nature of the OT as Scripture witness, as self-revelation of God, and as intentionally canonically conscious provides the basis for reading these diverse texts within their final form(s) as received by Israel and the church. It does not disregard things such as historical or text critical issues but places them within the broader already received form of Scripture as bearing witness to God’s self-disclosure and plan of redemption.For Gignilliat, the pluriformity of the final form of OT texts is not a witness against canonicity but precisely a move toward it with an appreciation of the diverse communities shaped and shaping such texts in their reception of them as Scripture. This is notable in his attempts to engage matters such as the divergent texts of the Judean Desert, septuagintal readings, and the Masoretic tradition (among others). These bear witness to diverse communities with (at times) divergent final forms of OT texts, yet belonging still to the overall consciousness of these texts bound to and shaping such communities in relation to other texts doing likewise. For Gignilliat, this is evidence of the uniformity of texts existing alongside the pluriformity of texts that serve as witness to the notion of “canon” not being a final list for inclusion or exclusion, but as witness to the unified and pluriform witness of God’s self-revelation and unified and pluriform communities. Thus, Gignilliat would propose canon function as a “rule of faith” (p. 75) for the divergent communities both of Israel and the emerging church of the NT period (this further witnesses to divergent textual forms of the OT).Broadly, this volume is divided into two parts: the first addressing the material form of Scripture and the second addressing the subject matter of Scripture. The first part provides engagement with the distinctions between “Scripture” and “Canon,” the final form and the canonical shape, canonical intentionality, and, finally, textual criticism in light of the Christian canon. Part two addresses two pressing issues for the church’s theological reading of the OT: the question of metaphysics in exegesis and the triunity of God’s self-revelation. While either part of this volume might have dealt with other topics (such as ecclesiologically constructive readings, variant canons, historical or literary critical readings), Gignilliat provides a succinct and focused approach to the theological interpretation of the OT. This volume is not a manual on this but instead offers a condensed emerging sampling of the heart of canonical and theological sensibilities in reading the OT. In this fashion, Gignilliat proposes that the formulators of Nicaea had in mind the very movements of self-revelation of the God of Israel, revealed in Father, Son, and Holy Spirit in the canonical unfolding and affirmations.For Gignilliat, the interrelation of the Scripture’s character and subject matter must never be dissolved or underplayed. He contends it is not only essential for the life of the church as church but as gleaned from the very consciousness of the texts of the OT themselves in revealing God’s economic (and even ontologic) self, made known most clearly in the revelation of Jesus the Christ, Son of the Father, ever-pointed to by the Spirit.Such a volume would prove beneficial reading for advanced undergraduate courses in OT, hermeneutics, or even homiletics. It would likely prove more beneficial for graduate students (particularly those training in seminaries) in similar courses. While there seem to be many within the guild of OT studies who might reject out of hand Gignilliat’s decidedly canonical and theological reading of the OT, his concise contribution should be welcomed as a conversation partner intentionally seeking to hear these texts formed and received in community to be interpreted within and for that community. It is this contention by Gignilliat that seems too often to lead to a disconnect between church and academy in reading Scripture, resulting in a burgeoning divorce of the place of these texts within these communities.
Read full abstract