AbstractMachine learning (ML) has been widely applied in Earth sciences, but its black‐box nature still remains. Existing techniques for interpretable ML developed by deep learning researchers are not satisfactory in understanding physical problems. In this study, our objective is to establish the physical linkage between features extracted from ML model and results derived from physical equations that describe the problem. This approach aims to provide a more comprehensible way of understanding an ML model. We select a less complex ML forecasting model, consisting of traditional statistical algorithms, which effectively forecast sea surface temperature anomaly (SSTA) and sea level anomaly (SLA) of the South China Sea (SCS) in 30 days ahead. Here, we focus on the SLA prediction and detect the physical mechanism of model capability to predict SCS SLA. Previous study has identified Rossby normal modes as the physical mechanism for long‐lived eddies in SCS in previous study. We here demonstrate the relationship between the ML model and Rossby normal modes in SCS in terms of temporal variations and spatial distributions of water mass. The model's skill in predicting Rossby normal modes partially explains its skill in predicting SLA, thereby providing a more transparent and interpretable basis for forecasts in SCS.
Read full abstract