China National Medical Products Administration Research Articles

Establishment of RWS guidance reflecting contributions of China to regulatory science

ABSTRACT China’s accession to the ICH has accelerated the advancement of its regulatory science. To foster innovation and improve the efficiency of pharmaceutical research and development, the China National Medical Products Administration (NMPA) encourages the use of real-world evidence (RWE) to support drug regulatory decision-making and has constructed a series of real-world study (RWS) related guidance, reflecting the contribution of the NMPA to the field of RWS in drug clinical development. Based on the four guidelines on RWE, real-world data (RWD), RWS design and protocol development, and communication with regulatory authorities, the guidance has been extended to more specific clinical applications, such as oncology, rare diseases, pediatric drugs, and traditional Chinese medicine. This paper reviews the core content and features of the series of RWS guidelines, presents their role in promoting drug development, and discusses challenges of using RWE in support of drug regulatory decision-making in China.

China expert recommendations on anaplastic lymphoma kinase-tyrosine kinase inhibitors treatment for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (2024 edition)

Anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) fusion represents one of pivotal driver genes within the realm of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). ALK-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (ALK-TKI) have demonstrated remarkable therapeutic efficacy for patients afflicted with ALK-positive NSCLC. As of June 27, 2023, seven ALK-TKI, including crizotinib, ceritinib, alectinib, ensartinib, brigatinib, lorlatinib, and iruplinalkib, have garnered approval from the China National Medical Products Administration (NMPA)(ranking according to the approval time for marketing by NMPA), providing individualized treatment modalities for ALK-positive NSCLC patients. To standardize the application of ALK-TKI, the Chinese Association for Clinical Oncologists and the Medical Oncology Branch of China International Exchange and Promotive Association for Medical and Health Care has organized experts to compile the " China expert recommendations on anaplastic lymphoma kinase-tyrosine kinase inhibitors treatment for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (2024 edition)". This treatment expert recommendation provides recommendations in four aspects, encompassing ALK fusion testing, ALK-TKI targeted therapy, ALK-TKI adverse events management, and patient post-treatment follow-up, thus serving as a valuable reference for the standardized treatment of Chinese advanced ALK fusion-positive NSCLC.

Decoding Cosmetic Complexities: A Comprehensive Guide to Matrix Composition and Pretreatment Technology.

Despite advancements in analytical technologies, the complex nature of cosmetic matrices, coupled with the presence of diverse and trace unauthorized additives, hinders the application of these technologies in cosmetics analysis. This not only impedes effective regulation of cosmetics but also leads to the continual infiltration of illegal products into the market, posing serious health risks to consumers. The establishment of cosmetic regulations is often based on extensive scientific experiments, resulting in a certain degree of latency. Therefore, timely advancement in laboratory research is crucial to ensure the timely update and adaptability of regulations. A comprehensive understanding of the composition of cosmetic matrices and their pretreatment technologies is vital for enhancing the efficiency and accuracy of cosmetic detection. Drawing upon the China National Medical Products Administration's 2021 Cosmetic Classification Rules and Classification Catalogue, we streamline the wide array of cosmetics into four principal categories based on the following compositions: emulsified, liquid, powdered, and wax-based cosmetics. In this review, the characteristics, compositional elements, and physicochemical properties inherent to each category, as well as an extensive overview of the evolution of pretreatment methods for different categories, will be explored. Our objective is to provide a clear and comprehensive guide, equipping researchers with profound insights into the core compositions and pretreatment methods of cosmetics, which will in turn advance cosmetic analysis and improve detection and regulatory approaches in the industry.

Iruplinalkib (WX-0593) Versus Crizotinib in ALK TKI-Naive Locally Advanced or Metastatic ALK-Positive NSCLC: Interim Analysis of a Randomized, Open-Label, Phase 3 Study (INSPIRE)

IntroductionIruplinalkib (WX-0593) is a new-generation, potent ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) that has been found to have systemic and central nervous system (CNS) efficacy in ALK-positive NSCLC. We compared the efficacy and safety of iruplinalkib with crizotinib in patients with ALK TKI-naive, locally advanced or metastatic ALK-positive NSCLC. MethodsIn this open-label, randomized, multicenter, phase 3 study, patients with ALK-positive NSCLC were randomly assigned to receive iruplinalkib 180 mg once daily (7-d run-in at 60 mg once daily) or crizotinib 250 mg twice daily. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS) assessed by Independent Review Committee (IRC) per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1. Secondary end points included PFS by investigator, objective response rate (ORR), time to response, duration of response, intracranial ORR and time to CNS progression by IRC and investigator, overall survival, and safety. An interim analysis was planned after approximately 70% (134 events) of all 192 expected PFS events assessed by IRC were observed. Efficacy was analyzed in the intention-to-treat population. Safety was assessed in the safety population, which included all randomized patients who received at least one dose of the study drugs. This study is registered with Center for Drug Evaluation of China National Medical Products Administration (CTR20191231) and Clinicaltrials.gov (NCT04632758). ResultsFrom September 4, 2019, to December 2, 2020, a total of 292 patients were randomized and treated; 143 with iruplinalkib and 149 with crizotinib. At this interim analysis (145 events), the median follow-up time was 26.7 months (range: 3.7–37.7) in the iruplinalkib group and 25.9 months (range: 0.5–35.9) in the crizotinib group. The PFS assessed by IRC was significantly longer among patients in the iruplinalkib group (median PFS, 27.7 mo [95% confidence interval (CI): 26.3–not estimable] versus 14.6 mo [95% CI: 11.1–16.5] in the crizotinib group; hazard ratio, 0.34 [98.02% CI: 0.23–0.52], p < 0.0001). The ORR assessed by IRC was 93.0% (95% CI: 87.5–96.6) in the iruplinalkib group and 89.3% (95% CI: 83.1–93.7) in the crizotinib group. The intracranial ORR was 90.9% (10 of 11, 95% CI: 58.7–99.8) in the iruplinalkib group and 60.0% (nine of 15, 95% CI: 32.3–83.7) in the crizotinib group for patients with measurable baseline CNS metastases. Incidence of grade 3 or 4 treatment-related adverse events was 51.7% in the iruplinalkib group and 49.7% in the crizotinib group. ConclusionsIruplinalkib was found to have significantly improved PFS and improved intracranial antitumor activity versus crizotinib. Iruplinalkib may be a new treatment option for patients with advanced ALK-positive and ALK TKI-naive NSCLC. FundingThis study was funded by Qilu Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Jinan, People’s Republic of China, and partly supported by the National Science and Technology Major Project for Key New Drug Development (2017ZX09304015).

A comparative analysis of vaccine lists, prices, and candidates, and the national immunization program between China and the United States

Vaccines have an essential role in preventing infectious diseases and reducing the burden of disease. The differences in vaccine lists and prices, and the National Immunization Program (NIP) and vaccine development between China and the United States (US) in conjunction with epidemiologic data on infectious diseases were systematically compared. The epidemiologic data of infectious diseases in 2019 were extracted from the China National Health Commission and the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). The vaccine list was identified from the China National Medical Products Administration and US Food and Drug Administration databases. Vaccine prices were obtained via the China government procurement platform and the US CDC. The NIP vaccines for China and the US were obtained from the China and US CDCs. Vaccine candidates investigated in 2015-2022 were identified from the China Clinical Trial Registry Platform and the US clinicaltrials.gov database. Differences in the incidence of infectious diseases between China and the US were detected with both countries facing a lack of available vaccines for prevention of many diseases. The number of listed vaccines and preventable diseases in China was 59 and 36, respectively, which was higher than the US (45 and 31, respectively). The median price of NIP vaccines in China was significantly lower than the price in the US (median: $3.8 vs. $20; P&lt;0.001); however, there was no significant difference in the price of non-NIP vaccines (median: $68 vs. $86; P=0.498). Vaccines developed by local manufacturers were less expensive than imported products despite the absence of significant differences (median: $16 vs. $31; P=0.180). The number and types of NIP vaccines used to prevent infectious diseases in China were lower than the US. The majority of vaccine candidates in China were not novel compared to the US. Vaccines marketed in China for infectious diseases were comparable to the US. Our findings suggest that China should further expand NIP vaccines and incentive research and development on novel vaccines to improve accessibility based on infectious disease epidemiology.

Lentiviral Vectors in CAR-T Cell Manufacturing: Biological Principles, Manufacturing Process, and Frontier Development

Chimeric antigen receptor T cell (CAR-T) therapy, as the preeminent strategy in immunotherapy, has conferred benefits upon numerous cancer patients. Currently, there are six CAR-T therapies approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), while the China National Medical Products Administration (NMPA) has approved three. The manufacturing process for CAR-T cells (CAR-Ts) entails using lentiviral vectors (LVVs), which are efficacious in transducing functional genes to both dividing and nondividing cells. Also, LVVs exert their capacity to integrate relatively large segments of DNA. Despite this fact, LVV-based CAR-Ts production can prove prohibitively expensive, and the yield of LVV can be further enhanced. In recent years, in-vivo generation of CAR-Ts has attracted significant attention since it stands to eliminate the ex-vivo isolation and activation process for T cells, thereby decreasing the cost and time involved in production. In view of this, this review summarizes the biological principles of LVVs and their manufacturing process, which encompasses lentiviral vector production, T cell isolation and activation, and CAR-Ts production. Additionally, the cutting-edge developments associated with LVVs are outlined herein, offering direction for the production of the next generation of CAR-Ts.

Comparing tocilizumab biosimilar BAT1806/BIIB800 with reference tocilizumab in patients with moderate-to-severe rheumatoid arthritis with an inadequate response to methotrexate: a phase 3, randomised, multicentre, double-blind, active-controlled clinical trial

Biosimilars provide an opportunity to address unmet medical need by expanding access to biological treatments. This study aimed to show equivalent efficacy, and comparable safety, immunogenicity, and pharmacokinetic profiles of a proposed tocilizumab biosimilar BAT1806/BIIB800, to reference tocilizumab, in participants with rheumatoid arthritis with an inadequate response to methotrexate. This phase 3, multicentre, randomised, double-blind, active-controlled, equivalence study comprised a 24-week initial treatment period (results reported here) and a 24-week secondary treatment period. Participants were recruited at 54 centres across five countries (China, Ukraine, Poland, Georgia, and Bulgaria). Patients with active rheumatoid arthritis with an inadequate response to methotrexate were randomly assigned (1:1:2) to receive reference tocilizumab up to week 48, or reference tocilizumab up to week 24 followed by BAT1806/BIIB800 up to week 48 (the two reference tocilizumab groups were analysed as a single group in this analysis), or BAT1806/BIIB800 up to week 48 (the BAT1806/BIIB800 group), administered by intravenous infusion once every 4 weeks at a starting dose of 8 mg/kg. The primary endpoint was the proportion of participants who had a 20% improvement in American College of Rheumatology criteria (ACR20) at week 12 (for the European Medicines Agency [EMA]) or week 24 (for the US Food and Drug Administration [FDA] and China National Medical Products Administration [NMPA]) using prespecified equivalence margins (95% CI -14·5 to +14·5 [EMA], 90% CI -12·0 to +15·0 [FDA], and 95% CI -13·6 to +13·6 [NMPA]). The International Council for Harmonisation E9(R1) estimand framework, with strategies for addressing intercurrent events, was implemented for the efficacy evaluations with expected differences as per the predefined equivalence margins. This trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03830203) and EudraCT (2018-002202-31), and is closed to new participants. Between Dec 19, 2018, and Jan 5, 2021, we randomly assigned 621 participants: 309 to the reference tocilizumab group and 312 to the BAT1806/BIIB800 group. The mean age was 50·5 years (SD 12·0), 534 (86%) were women, 87 (14%) were men, and 368 (59%) were White. For the primary estimands, estimated ACR20 response rates were 64·8% in the reference tocilizumab group and 69·0% in the BAT1806/BIIB800 group (treatment difference 4·1% [95% CI -3·6 to 11·9]) at week 12, and 67·9% in the reference tocilizumab group and 69·9% in the BAT1806/BIIB800 group (treatment difference 1·9% [90% CI -4·0 to 7·9; 95% CI -5·2 to 9·1]) at week 24. All confidence intervals were contained within the predefined equivalence margins. Comparable pharmacokinetic and immunogenicity profiles were observed for the reference tocilizumab and BAT1806/BIIB800 groups. Adverse events were reported by 201 (65%) participants in the reference tocilizumab group and 206 (66%) in the BAT1806/BIIB800 group; 196 (63%) participants in the reference tocilizumab group and 201 (64%) participants in the BAT1806/BIIB800 group reported a treatment-emergent adverse event. Five participants had a fatal event (reference tocilizumab n=1; BAT1806/BIIB800 n=4). BAT1806/BIIB800 showed equivalent efficacy, and comparable safety, immunogenicity, and pharmacokinetic profiles as reference tocilizumab. Bio-Thera Solutions and Biogen.

Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Phase I, Dose- Escalation Study to Evaluate the Tolerance, Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics and Immunogenicity of PEGylated Urate Oxidase for Injection in Healthy Adults and Hyperuricemia Volunteers: Study Protocol.

Hyperuricemia is a disease with abnormal purine metabolism, which leads to the increase of urate concentration. It is an independent risk factor for the occurrence and development of metabolic syndrome, type 2 diabetes, hypertension, cardiovascular disease, chronic kidney disease, and gout. The enzyme urate oxidase can metabolize urate to allantoin, resulting in decreased urate concentrations. Pegylated the urate oxidase can extend half-life and decrease immunogenicity of the protein. This trial aims to evaluate the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics(PK), pharmacodynamics(PD) and immunogenicity of a new intravenous PEGylated urate oxidase produced by Xiuzheng Bio-Medicine Research Institute Co., Ltd. A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase I, dose escalation study will be conducted in China. In total, 56 subjects will be enrolled in the study, with 24 healthy subjects in the low dose-escalation stage and 32 patients with hyperuricemia in the high dose-escalation stage. There is a bridging between the two stages. Subjects are randomized to PEGylated urate oxidase or the placebo in a 3:1 ratio in each group and followed up for 71 days observation. The primary outcomes include PK, PD, tolerability; the secondary outcomes include safety and immunogenicity. The trial is performed abiding by the Declaration of Helsinki, Good clinical practice (GCP) and the guidelines of China National Medical Products Administration (NMPA). Relevant documents, including protocol, informed consent and drug inspection report, are all approved independently by the Medical Ethics Committee of the Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University. The first subject was enrolled on January 17, 2022. Clinicaltrials, NCT05226013 (Registered April 2, 2022, Retrospectively registered). ChinaDrugTrials, CTR20211801(Registered July 27, 2021).

PI3Kδ Inhibitor Linperlisib As a ≥ 3-Line Treatment for Relapsed or Refractory Follicular Lymphoma: A Subgroup Analysis of a Phase II, Single-Arm, Open-Label Trial

Introduction Follicular lymphoma (FL) is the most common subtype of indolent non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL), originating in follicular central B cells, and accounts for approximately 22% of all newly diagnosed cases of NHL. Chemo-immunotherapy is the standard treatment option for FL. Unfortunately, the progression of the disease to relapsed or refractory FL (r/r FL) is still inevitable, which raised concern about subsequent effective treatments. Several δ isoform of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K-δ) inhibitors have ever been approved for r/r FL after ≥2 lines of prior therapies. However, most of their indications for r/r FL were withdrawal for increased risk of death and serious side effects. The latest data from the Chinese phase II clinical trial of linperlisib (Trial registration ID: NCT04370405), a novel oral PI3Kδ-selective inhibitor, in patients with r/r FL who had received at least two systemic therapies were presented. In this trial, linperlisib demonstrated compelling efficacy and was generally well-tolerated in the treatment of r/r FL patients after ≥2 prior systemic therapies. Linperlisib was approved by China National Medical Products Administration (NMPA) for adult r/r FL previously treated with at least two system therapies in November 2022. The ≥3 lines of treatment options are still unmet for the r/r FL. In this setting, this subgroup analysis of the linperlisib phase II trial aimed to evaluate outcomes of linperlisib in later-line treatment of r/r FL. Methods This study included all the patients with r/r FL who had received at least two systemic therapies previously enrolled in the open-label, single-arm, phase II trial (linperlisib, 80mg, po, q.d., in a 28-day cycle), with overall response rate (ORR) as the primary endpoint. In this subgroup analysis, the patients were divided into two groups according to the treatment lines they received: &amp;gt;3 prior lines of treatment and ≤3 prior lines of treatment. All of the statistical analyses were descriptive. Results A total of 84 r/r FL patients from 25 sites in China from April 2019 to September 2020 were enrolled in this trial, with a cutoff date of September 30, 2021. The ORR was 79.8%, with statistical significance in a heavily pretreated FL patient population with a median of 4 prior therapies, with a well-tolerated safety profile. A total of 43 patients received &amp;gt;3 prior lines of treatment, while 41 patients received ≤3 prior lines of treatment. The median age between the two groups was similar (range: 29.0 - 78.0, 52.0 years for &amp;gt;3 prior lines vs. 48.0 years for ≤3 prior lines). The majority of patients had Ann Arbor staging III-IV (40 for &amp;gt;3 prior lines vs. 34 for ≤3 prior lines). The median number of prior regimens was 4 for &amp;gt;3 prior lines and 3 for ≤3 prior lines. Overall, there were 67 patients achieved responses, with ORR of 83.7% (36, 95%CI:69.3, 93.2) for &amp;gt;3 prior lines vs. 75.6% (31, 95% CI: 59.7, 87.6) for ≤3 prior lines based on independent review committee assessment. Compared with patients who received ≤3 prior lines, patients received ≤3 prior lines achieved higher disease control rate (41[95.3] vs. 37 [90.2%]). The median DOR was 12 months (95% CI: 7.3, 15.9) for &amp;gt;3 prior lines vs. 13 months (95% CI: 9.2, NE). The median PFS was 11.9 months (95% CI: 9.1,19.4) for &amp;gt;3 prior lines vs. 13.3 months (95% CI: 8.2, NE) for ≤3 prior lines. The OS of both groups was not reached. The most common treatment-related adverse events (≥20%, TRAEs) were neutropenia (21 [48.8%] for &amp;gt;3 prior lines vs. 18 [43.9%] for ≤3 prior lines), leukocyte count decreased (15 [34.9%] vs. 15 [36.6%]), alanine aminotransferase increased (10 [23.3%] vs. 9 [22.0%]), lymphocyte count decreased (9 [20.9%] vs. 5 [12.2%]), hypertriglyceridemia (9 [20.9%] vs. 11 [26.8%]), and hypercholesteremia (6 [24.0%] vs. 7 [11.9%]). The most common grade ≥3 TRAEs (≥10%) were neutropenia (9 [20.9%] vs. 4 [9.8%]), pulmonary inflammation (3 [7.0%] vs. 6 [14.6%]), infectious pneumonia (2 [4.7%] vs. 5 [12.2%]). Conclusions This subgroup analysis revealed that linperlisib could achieve benefit in r/r FL patients who received at least 2 prior system therapies regardless of treatment lines. The AEs were well-tolerated. Further trials with large-scale samples were warranted.

Efficacy and Safety of Axicabtagene Ciloleucel (Axi-cel) for the Treatment of Relapse/Refractory Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma: Real-World Data in Chinese Population

Background: Autologous CD-19 directed chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy has become the standard of care of patients with relapsed/refractory (R/R) large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL) who have received two or more prior lines of therapy. In June 2021, Axi-cel was approved by the China National Medical Products Administration (NMPA) for the treatment of these patients as the first commercial CAR-T product in China. To better understand the efficacy and safety of commercial Axi-cel in Chinese R/R NHL patients in a real-world setting, we conducted this multi-center, non-interventional study (ChiCTR2100047990). The accrual goal is 200 patients, and the primary endpoint is mOS. Here we made the pre-specific interim analysis and the reported the clinical outcomes. Methods: We included R/R NHL patients treated with commercial Axi-cel at 17 authorized treatment centers from November 2021 to February 2023. All the patients signed written informed consent. We reported best objective response rate (bORR), best complete response (bCR) rate and adverse events of special interest (AESI), including cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and neurological events (NE). Results: To the cut-off date of June 8, 2023, a total of 101 R/R NHL patients had undergone efficacy evaluation at month 3. The median age of patients was 56.5 (22, 80) years, with 23 patients (22.8%) aged 65 years or older. Fifty-nine patients were male. The baseline characteristics of these patients included 81 (80.2%) with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma, 4 (4.0%) with primary mediastinal B-cell lymphoma, and 7 (6.9%) with high-grade B-cell lymphoma. More than 50% of patients had an International Prognostic Index (IPI) score ≥3. The median number of prior treatment was 2. Thirty-eight patients (37.6%) had received 3 or more previous therapies and 10 patients (9.9%) had undergone autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT). The primary refractory subgroup reached 46 (45.5%), and 41(40.6%) patients were refractory to second-line or subsequent therapy. Notably, compared to the baseline characteristics of Axi-cel real-world studies for R/R LBCL in other countries, a greater proportion of Chinese patients had an ECOG PS score ≥2 (32.7%), HBsAg (+) with normal HBV-DNA (23.1%), HBsAg (-) accompany with HBcAb (+) (37.1%). Bridging therapy was given in 73 patients (72.3%), while combination anti-lymphoma therapy was used after Axi-cel infusion and before disease progression in 52 patients (51.5%). The median follow-up was 12.7 months. The bORR and bCR rate was 83.2% (95%CI, 74.4 - 89.9) and 63.4% (95%CI, 53.2 - 72.7), respectively (Fig 1). The bORR was consistent across covariates including disease type, cell of origin and refractory subgroup, ECOG PS score ≥2, HBsAg (+) and normal HBV-DNA, and HBsAg (-) accompany with HBcAb (+), etc.. The median duration of response (DOR) was 13.7 months (95% CI, 11.1 - NA). mDOR was not reached in bCR patients (95% CI, 11.2 - NA), while patients with best response as PR have a median DOR as 4.7 months (95% CI, 1.8- 6.7). Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 14.6 months (95% CI, 7.6 - NA). Patients with ECOG PS score ≥2 had a shorter median PFS [7.6 months (95%CI 3.0 - NA)] compared to patients with PS 0-1 [14.6 months (95%CI 12.1 - NA)]. Median PFS also differed among patients based on their response at month 3. Patients with CR/PR/non-response at month3 had a median PFS of NR (95% CI, 12.1 - NA), NR (95%CI, 6.1 - NA) and 3.0 months (95%CI, 2.4 - 3.3), respectively (Fig 2). The median OS was not reached, and the estimated OS at 12 months was 80.4% (95%CI, 70.5 - 87.2). No new safety signals were observed in the Chinese population. The most common adverse events of grade ≥3 were decreased white blood cell count (82.2% of patients), neutropenia (81.3%) and lymphocytopenia (68.2%). CRS of any grade occurred in 90 patients (84.1%), with 15 patients (14.0%) experiencing grade ≥3. NE of any grade occurred in 27 patients (25.2%), with only 1 patient (0.9%) experiencing grade 4. No grade 5 CRS or NE appeared. Conclusions: This pre-specific interim analysis demonstrated the consistent efficacy of Axi-cel in Chinese R/R NHL patients, while NE of any grade and ≥grade 3 were lower. Similar to the result of the ZUMA-1 study, response at month 3 may predict PFS in Chinese R/R NHL patients treated with Axi-cel in real-world practice.

Development of clinical trials for non-small cell lung cancer drugs in China from 2005 to 2023.

Over the past few decades, the development of anti-cancer drugs in China has made outstanding achievements based on the support of national policies. To assess the progress of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) drugs, we conducted a statistical analysis of clinical trials of drugs targeting NSCLC in China from 2005 to 2023. We downloaded, screened and analysed the data from three official websites, the Centre for Drug Evaluation of China National Medical Products Administration website (NMPA), ClinicalTrials.gov and the Chinese Clinical Trial Registry (ChiCTR). From January 1, 2005 to April 15, 2023, a total of 1,357 drug clinical trials that met the standards were included, and the number of registered drug clinical trials has been increasing year by year, reaching the maximum of 199 in 2021. Among them, the maximum of 462 items (34.05%) in phase II clinical trials, followed by 333 (24.54%) in phase III clinical trials, and 139 (10.24%) in phase IV clinical trials. In all drug clinical trials, industry sponsored trials (ISTs) have 722 items (53.21%), which are higher than investigator-initiated trials (IITs). The clinical trials of chemical drugs have a maximum of 723 items (53.28%), while biopharmaceuticals have grown rapidly in the past 10 years, with a total of 374 (27.56%), and 48.19% of the drug clinical trials of combined medication. In addition, the geographical distribution of the leading units and participating units of Chinese drug clinical trials are uneven, and economic regions such as Beijing, Shanghai, Jiangsu are obviously ahead of other regions. From 2005 to 2023, the clinical trials of registered drugs for the treatment of NSCLC increased rapidly. Among them, due to the development of immunotherapy, the clinical trials of biopharmaceuticals and drugs for combined medication are growing most rapidly, while the exploration of the original drugs is a little far from enough. Our research provides a direction for the future drug clinical trials of NSCLC, laying foundation for further extending the survival rate of patients with NSCLC.

China clinical practice guideline for epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors in stage Ⅳ non-small cell lung cancer (version 2023)

The incidence and mortality of lung cancer rank first among malignant tumors in China. Among them, non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is the most important pathological type, accounting for 80%-85% of lung cancer patients, including adenocarcinoma, squamous cell carcinoma and other pathological subtypes. In recent years, with the discovery of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) gene and the successful development of tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), the treatment efficacy of stage Ⅳ NSCLC patients with EGFR gene sensitive mutation has been greatly improved. As of August 23, 2023, the first generation EGFR-TKIs, gefitinib, icotinib, and erlotinib; the second generation EGFR-TKIs, afatinib and dacomitinib; and the third generation EGFR-TKIs, osimertinib, almonertinib, furmonertinib and befotertinib were all approved for marketing by China National Medical Products Administration (NMPA). In addition, multiple domestic third-generation EGFR-TKIs are undergoing clinical trials, such as rezivertinib (BPI-7711), limertinib (ASK120067), and oritinib (SH-1028). Meanwhile, mobocertinib and sunvozertinib, which targets EGFR 20ins mutations, were also approved by NMPA. With the increasing variety of EGFR-TKIs approved for marketing subsequently, it brings confusion to clinicians when choosing specific medications, and there is an urgent need to develop relevant treatment guidelines. Hence, the Medical Oncology Branch of China International Exchange and Promotive Association for Medical and Health Care and the Chinese Association for Clinical Oncologists convened experts to integrate the research results of various EGFR-TKIs, and proposed the "China clinical practice guideline for epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors in stage Ⅳ non-small cell lung cancer (version 2023)", to provide reference for better clinical practice.

Sustained Remission and Decreased Severity of CAR T-Cell Related Adverse Events: A Pivotal Study Report of CNCT19 (inaticabtagene autoleucel) Treatment in Adult Patients with Relapsed/Refractory B-Cell Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia (R/R B-Cell ALL) in China

CNCT19 (inaticabtagene autoleucel) is an autologous CD19-specific chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell product. The patent protected CAR structure of CNCT19 contains a unique CD19 scFv, HI19a, which is different from commonly used FMC63. Together with using 4-1BB co-stimulatory domain in the CAR structure, CNCT19 is expected to reduce the severity of treatment-associated cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and neurologic toxicities (NT) while maintaining a stronger and longer durable anti-tumor effect.CNCT19 has been granted Breakthrough Therapy Designation by China National Medical Products Administration and Orphan Drug Designation by the U.S. FDA for the treatment of ALL.The trial of CNCT19 in adult Chinese patients with R/R B-cell ALL (NCT04684147) is a single-arm, open-label pivotal study conducted at 10 centers in China. The primary endpoint was the overall complete response rate (OCR) of complete response (CR) and CR with incomplete hematological recovery (CRi) within 3 months and at the end of Month 3 after CNCT19 infusion by central assessment.All 39 patients diagnosed with B-cell ALL were refractory and relapsed to multiple lines of prior therapy. Among the 39 patients 32 (82.1%) had reached MRD-negative OCR within 3 months after CNCT19 infusion, The median duration of response and OS have not been reached. 25 patients (64.1%) remained on CR (51.3%) or CRi (12.8%). at the end of Month 3 after CNCT19 infusion These patients had sustained long-term remission regardless of whether subsequent allo-HSCT treatment was done or not. The most common CNCT19-related adverse events (AEs) were CRS and NT and there were 4 cases of Grade ≥ 3 CRS (n=4, 10.3%) and 3 cases of Grade ≥ 3 NT (n=3, 7.7%). Following CNCT19 infusion, all the patients recovered. No death cases were reported due to CRS or NT.CNCT19 CAR-T cell therapy achieved a high rate of MRD-negative complete remission in adult patients with R/R B-cell ALL. Thus, with its distinct CAR structure containing a unique CD19 scFv (HI19a), CNCT19 provides effective treatment with potential long-term clinical benefits for adult patients with R/R B-cell ALL.

Evidence of pre-approval clinical trial supporting the granted conditional approval for novel cancer drugs in China between 2015 and 2022

Accelerated approval (AA) of novel anticancer drugs based on surrogacy has attracted considerable concern globally. China National Medical Products Administration (NMPA) also established a similar conditional approval (CA) program to accelerate the approval of novel drugs to address unmet medical needs. This cross-sectional study aimed to evaluate the pre-approval clinical trial evidence and potential challenge of cancer drugs receiving CA in China from policy implementation to2022. The cancer drugs (initial and supplemental indications) granted CA between January 1, 2015 and December 31, 2022 using the public database of the NMPA were analyzed. The characteristics of the cancer drugs received CA were described. Primary efficacy endpoints and safety derived from the pre-approval clinical trial, including response rates (RR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), treatment-related serious adverse events (SAE) and Grade ≥3 adverse events (AEs) were quantitatively estimated by meta-analysis. Besides, the correlation between the surrogate endpoints and OS was estimated by the reported trial-level correlation analysis. The NMPA approved 72 cancer indications (56 new molecular entities) with CA between 2015 and 2022. 34 indications (47%) were also approved by the FDA or EMA. 74% (53/72) of cancer indications were based on a single-arm trial design while 26% (19/72) for randomized controlled trials. The pooled RR was 0.50 (95% CI: 0.45-0.55, I2=96%) with significant differences across cancer types and targets while the pooled hazard risk was 0.39 (95% CI: 0.28-0.53, I2=89%) for PFS and 0.67 (95% CI: 0.61-0.73, I2=0%) for OS. The pooled treatment-related SAE and Grade ≥3 AEs from single-arm designs resulted in 15% and 25%, respectively. In randomized controlled trials, the pooled treatment-related SAE and Grade ≥3 AEs observed in CA drugs and the control groups were comparable. Surrogate endpoints were widely used as the primary efficacy endpoints in the pre-approval pivotal clinical trials with 75% (54/72) for RR, 10% (7/72) for PFS, and 4% (3/72) for others. Of these, 27% (17/63) of the surrogate endpoints reported a trial-level correlation with OS; three reported high correlation (r≥0.85), two reported moderate correlation (0.70 ≤ r<0.85) and 12 reported low correlation (r<0.70). The majority of novel cancer drugs that received CA were based on RR designed for single-arm trials. The reported correlations of treatment effect between the surrogate endpoints and OS used for CA were limited. Our findings highlighted that the introduction of OS or quality of life based on RCT in confirmatory clinical trials as much as feasible was essential to ensure the clinical benefits for patients. This study was supported by postdoctoral fellowship from Tsinghua-Peking Joint Centers for Life Sciences (CLS).

Utilization of glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists in children and adolescents in China: a real-world study.

Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) have been widely used in treating type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) and obesity in adults, but scientific research about the indication in children and adolescents is scarce. The current study aims to explore the prescriptions of GLP-1RAs in children and adolescents in China and to evaluate its rationality. GLP-1RA prescriptions of children and adolescents were retrospectively obtained from the Hospital Prescription Analysis Cooperative Project. The study extracted information on patient's demographic characteristics, monotherapy and combination therapy of GLP-1RAs, and trends in GLP-1RA usage from 2016 to 2021. The rationality of GLP-1RA prescriptions was comprehensively assessed based on the indications approved by China National Medical Products Administration (NMPA), the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), European Medicines Agency (EMA), Pharmaceuticals and Medical Devices Agency (PMDA), and published randomized controlled trials (RCTs). A total of 234 prescriptions from 46 hospitals were included, with a median age of 17 years old. The majority of patients were diagnosed with overweight/obesity or prediabetes/diabetes, accounting for 43.59% and 46.15%, respectively. There were 88 patients on GLP-1RA monotherapy. GLP-1RAs plus metformin was the most common combination therapy (38.89%). 12.39% of patients were found a co-administration with orlistat. The share of overweight/obesity prescriptions increased from 27% in 2016 to 54% in 2021, whereas prediabetes/diabetes prescriptions declined from 55% to 42%. The prescriptions were divided into appropriate and questionable groups according to the diagnosis, and the potentially questionable prescription was related to age (p = 0.017), department visited (p = 0.002), and any hospitalization (p < 0.001). This study described the prescribing of GLP-1RAs in children and adolescents. Our findings indicated that the utilization of GLP-1RAs has increased from 2016 to 2021. There was a strong basis for administering GLP-1RAs in overweight/obesity and prediabetes/diabetes, whereas the evidence was insufficient in other conditions. It is crucial to demand robust and sustained efforts to enhance the awareness of the safety of utilization of GLP-1RAs in children and adolescents.

New anti-diabetic drug Morus alba L. (Sangzhi) alkaloids (SZ-A) improves diabetic nephropathy through ameliorating inflammation and fibrosis in diabetic rats.

Morus alba L. (Sangzhi) alkaloid (SZ-A) is a new antidiabetic drug approved by the China National Medical Products Administration in 2020. Diabetic nephropathy (DN) is a common diabetic complication and an important cause of morbidity and mortality in patients with diabetes. The effects of SZ-A on DN remain unknown. This study evaluated the effects of SZ-A on DN in Zucker diabetic fatty (ZDF) rats and explored the underlying mechanisms based on nitrosative stress, inflammation, and fibrosis. Diabetic ZDF rats were orally administered 100 and 200 mg/kg of SZ-A once daily for 9 weeks. The glucose metabolism and kidney function were assayed. The pathological injury and fibrosis of the kidneys were separately evaluated using hematoxylin and eosin staining and Masson's staining. The oxidative and nitrosative stress and inflammation were assayed by determining the levels of related indices in the blood and kidneys and quantifying the related gene and protein expression. The expression of transforming growth factor β1 (TGFβ1) gene and protein were assayed by quantitative real-time PCR and immunohistochemistry, respectively. The renal transcriptomics was analyzed using RNA sequencing. Repeated treatment with SZ-A significantly improved glucose metabolism, dose-dependently decreased the levels of blood urea nitrogen, urinary albumin, and β2-microglobulin, and evidently relieved the renal injury in diabetic ZDF rats. As for the mechanisms, SZ-A remarkably ameliorated systemic nitrosative stress through lowering the levels of blood inducible nitric oxide synthase and nitric oxide, and significantly relieved systemic and renal inflammation by reducing the levels of blood interleukin-1β and monocyte chemoattractant protein-1 (MCP-1) and decreasing the levels of renal C-reactive protein content and expression of tumor necrosis factor-α in the kidneys. SZ-A also improved renal fibrosis by lowering the expression of TGFβ1 in the kidneys. Additionally, SZ-A significantly lowered the expression of stimulator of chondrogenesis 1 in the kidneys. Repeated treatments with SZ-A significantly ameliorates DN by regulating systemic nitrosative stress, renal inflammation, and renal fibrosis partially through inhibition of the cytokine-NO and TGF-β1 signaling in ZDF rats, providing evidence for the additional application of SZ-A in clinical use for the treatment of DN.

A trial-based cost-utility analysis of sugemalimab vs. placebo as consolidation therapy for unresectable stage III NSCLC in China.

The effectiveness of sugemalimab vs. placebo in post-chemoradiotherapy patients with locally advanced, unresectable stage III NSCLC has been demonstrated and approved by China National Medical Products Administration. The purpose of this study was to assess the cost-effectiveness of sugemalimab vs. placebo for consolidation treatment of stage III NSCLC from the perspective of the Chinese healthcare system. A 3-state Markov model with a 3-week cycle length was performed to appraise the incremental cost-utility ratio (ICUR) of sugemalimab consolidation therapy based on the GEMSTONE-301 clinical trial over a 10-year time horizon. Only direct medical costs, including costs of drug (maintenance and subsequent treatment), routine follow-up, best supportive care, and terminal care in end of life were considered in this model. Costs and health utilities were obtained from local databases and published articles. Sensitivity and scenario analyses were adopted to evaluate the model uncertainty. Internal and external data sources were used to justify the plausibility of the extrapolated portion of the survival model chosen. In comparison with the placebo, sugemalimab consolidation therapy was not cost-effective as it yielded an ICUR value of $90,277 and $49,692 for the concurrent chemoradiotherapy (cCRT) and the sequential chemoradiotherapy (sCRT) population at the willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold of $37,663/QALYs, respectively. When taking the sugemalimab patient assistance program (PAP) into consideration, sugemalimab consolidation therapy was cost-effective with an ICUR dramatic decreases below the WTP. Sensitivity analyses demonstrated that the ICUR was most sensitive to the discount rate and subsequent treatment. However, none of the sensitive parameters could affect the cost-effective conclusions without or with PAP. Scenario analyses revealed that the model was particularly affected by assumptions regarding discount in sugemalimab, time horizon, mean duration of sugemalimab maintenance treatment. From the perspective of Chinese healthcare system, sugemalimab consolidation therapy was not a cost-effective strategy in cCRT and sCRT patients with unresectable stage III NSCLC. Given that the sugemalimab PAP was available, sugemalimab consolidation therapy became a cost-effective option.

Adverse drug reactions of non-statin antihyperlipidaemic drugs in China from 1989 to 2019: a national database analysis

ObjectiveThis study aims to understand the adverse drug reactions (ADRs) for non-statin antihyperlipidaemic drugs included in the China Anti-hyperlipidemic Drug Database.DesignAn approach of Chinese national database analysis was employed to...

Evolution of China regulatory guidance on the clinical evaluation of medical devices and its implication on pre-market and post-approval clinical evaluation strategies

ABSTRACT Introduction The rapid growth of the medical device industry has driven the evolution of regulatory guidance on medical device clinical evaluation (MDCE) of the China National Medical Products Administration (NMPA), which consequently influences pre–market and post–approval clinical evaluation (CE) strategies. Areas covered We aimed to investigate the 3–stage evolution of NMPA regulatory guidance on MDCE (1. The era before specific CE guidance, 2. 2015 CE Guidance, and 3. 2021 CE Guidance Series), analyze the gaps between each stage, and assess the evolution’s impact on pre–market and post–approval CE strategies. Expert opinion The fundamental principles of the NMPA 2021 CE Guidance Series were transformed from the 2019 International Medical Device Regulatory Forum documents. Compared with the 2015 guidance, the 2021 CE Guidance Series further clarifies the CE definition by emphasizing the ongoing activity of CE through an entire product lifecycle and the use of scientifically sound methods for CE and narrows the pre–market CE pathways into the equivalent device and clinical trial pathways. The 2021 CE Guidance Series simplifies the process for selecting the pre–market CE strategy but does not specify post–approval CE update cadency and general requirements for post-market clinical follow–up.

Ciprofol: A Novel Alternative to Propofol in Clinical Intravenous Anesthesia?

Ciprofol is a novel compound that was independently developed in China. According to the Chinese product instructions approved by the China National Medical Products Administration and the information of official website, indications for ciprofol include sedation and anesthesia during the surgical/procedure of nontracheal intubation, induction and maintenance of general anesthesia, and sedation during intensive care. Ciprofol is a short-acting intravenous sedative based on the structural modification of propofol. Ciprofol has high efficacy, good selectivity, and fewer adverse reactions, indicating good clinical application potential. A series of clinical studies have been conducted to evaluate the sedative effect of ciprofol in various procedures and settings, including gastroscopy and colonoscopy, fiber-optic bronchoscopy, general anesthesia in elective surgeries, and mechanical ventilation in intensive care units. This review summarizes the chemical structure, pharmacodynamics, and pharmacokinetic properties of ciprofol. We also assessed the efficacy and safety of ciprofol by synthesizing the relevant clinical trial data.