Chin-brow Vertical Angle Research Articles

Treatment of Andersson lesion-complicating ankylosing spondylitis via early minimally invasive surgery.

A variety of surgical methods and strategies have been demonstrated for Andersson lesion (AL) therapy. In 2011, we proposed and identified the feasibility of stabilizing the spine without curettaging the vertebral or discovertebral lesion to cure non-kyphotic AL. Additionally, due to the excellent reunion ability of ankylosing spondylitis, we further came up with minimally invasive spinal surgery (MIS) to avoid the need for both bone graft and lesion curettage in AL surgery. However, there is a paucity of research into the comparison between open spinal fusion (OSF) and early MIS in the treatment of AL. The purpose of this study was to investigate and compare the clinical outcomes and radiological evaluation of our early MIS approach and OSF for AL. A total of 39 patients diagnosed with AL who underwent surgery from January 2004 to December 2022 were retrospectively screened for eligibility. Patients with AL were divided into an MIS group and an OSF group. The primary outcomes were union of the lesion on radiograph and CT, as well as the visual analogue scale (VAS) and Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) scores immediately after surgery, and at the follow-up (mean 29 months (standard error (SE) 9)). The secondary outcomes were total blood loss during surgery, operating time, and improvement in the radiological parameters: global and local kyphosis, sagittal vertical axis, sagittal alignment, and chin-brow vertical angle immediately after surgery and at the follow-up. Data for 30 patients with AL were evaluated: 14 in the MIS group and 16 in the OSF group. All patients were followed up after surgery; no nonunion complications or instrumentation failures were observed in either group. No significant differences in the VAS and ODI scores were identified between the two groups. Mean ODI improved from 51 (SE 5) to 17 (SE 5) in the MIS group and from 52 (SE 6) to 19 (SE 5) in the OSF group at the follow-up. There were significant improvements in total blood loss (p = 0.025) and operating time (p < 0.001) between the groups. There was also no significant difference in local kyphosis six months postoperatively (p = 0.119). Early MIS is an effective treatment for AL. MIS provides comparable clinical outcomes to those treated with OSF, with less total blood loss and shorter operating time. Our results support and identify the feasibility of solid immobilization achieved by posterior instrumentation without bone graft via MIS for the treatment of AL.

An effective strategy for treatment of severe kyphosis secondary to ankylosing spondylitis: one-level modified osteotomy combined with shoulders lifting correction method

BackgroundSevere kyphosis is a common condition in patients with advanced ankylosing spondylitis (AS). Although two-level osteotomy may serve as a potential alternative, it is often associated with increased blood loss and elevated surgical risks. To date, the optimal treatment for the challenging condition remains unclear. This study aims to introduce an effective strategy for the treatment of severe kyphosis secondary to AS, using one-level modified osteotomy combined with shoulders lifting correction method.MethodsSeventy AS kyphosis who were treated with the strategy from 2012 to 2022, were reviewed retrospectively. All patients were followed up for a minimum duration of 2 years. Spinal and pelvic parameters were measured, including pelvic tilt (PT), pelvic incidence (PI), sacral slope (SS), lumber lordosis (LL), PI and LL mismatch (PI-LL), thoracic kyphosis, global kyphosis (GK), T1 pelvic angle (TPA), sagittal vertical axis (SVA), osteotomized vertebral angle (OVA), and chin-brow vertical angle (CBVA). Parameters of local osteotomized complex were measured and calculated, including the height of osteotomized complex and the length of spinal cord shortening. Clinical outcome was evaluated using Scoliosis Research Society-22 and Oswestry Disability Index scores.ResultsSeventy patients with average age of 39.8 years were followed-up for 29.3 months. Average operation time was 373.5 min, and average blood loss was 751.0 ml. Postoperatively, sagittal balance was successfully restored. GK decreased from 90.6° to 35.6°, LL decreased from 8.0° to -35.1°, TPA decreased from 56.8° to 27.8°, and SVA decreased from 24.4 cm to 8.7 cm (P < 0.05). A harmonious and matched spinopelvic alignment was achieved. PT decreased from 37.2° to 26.3°, PI-LL decreased from 54.1° to 10.2°, and SS increased from 9.2° to 19.7°(P < 0.05). Horizontal vision was obtained with postoperative CBVA of 8.8°. Average OVA correction was up to 47.3°, and the spinal cord was shortened by 24.3 mm, with a shortening rate of 36.0%. All patients demonstrated a favorable clinical outcome. No permanent nerve damage, screw loosening, rod breakage and main vascular injury were observed. One case required revision surgery due to screw cap loosening and delayed union. Solid bone fusion was achieved in all other patients.ConclusionsOne-level modified osteotomy combined with shoulders lifting correction method is a safe and effective strategy for the treatment of severe AS kyphosis. This strategy offers a promising alternative for managing severe AS kyphosis, and may be particularly well-suited for individuals with concurrent osteoporosis.Level of evidenceLevel IV, therapeutic study.

Necessity of posterior osteotomies for mild flexible cervical deformity correction.

Correction of mild flexible cervical deformity (CD) via the posterior approach has been described with and without the use of posterior osteotomies (POs), despite a lack of clarity regarding their necessity or risks. The purpose of this study was to determine whether the use of POs when correcting mild flexible CD leads to improved clinical or radiographic outcomes, as well as defining the relative risks in utilizing them. A prospective multicenter registry of operative CD patients was analyzed. Inclusion criteria were cervical kyphosis > 10°, cervical scoliosis > 10°, cervical sagittal vertical axis (cSVA) > 4 cm, or chin-brow vertical angle > 25°. Mild deformity was defined by a cSVA of 3-5 cm and/or kyphosis < 15°. Flexibility was defined by a C2-7 angular change > 5° on preoperative flexion/extension radiographs. Patients who received a posterior column osteotomy (PCO) (Ames grades 1 and 2) were compared with patients who did not undergo a PCO (noPCO) as well as those who underwent a three-column osteotomy (3CO) (Ames grades 3-6). Ninety-five patients (33 PCO, 49 noPCO, 13 3CO) met the inclusion criteria. Both the number of levels fused (9.2 vs 7.7, p = 0.001) and the estimated blood loss (EBL) (1027 vs 486 mL, p = 0.012) were higher in the PCO cohort. Patients in the noPCO group were more likely to have a cervical apex of kyphosis (71.1%, p = 0.046), while those undergoing 3COs were more likely to have a thoracic apex (58.3%, p = 0.005). Preoperative cSVA (PCO vs noPCO: 45.4 vs 37.9 cm, p = 0.084), T1 slope (32.5° vs 29.6°, p = 0.376), C2-7 lordosis (-8.9° vs -9.2°, p = 0.942), and modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association (mJOA) score (13.4 vs 13.5, p = 0.854) were similar; however, both Neck Disability Index (NDI) (55.6 vs 42, p = 0.002) and numeric rating scale (NRS) neck (7.2 vs 5.8, p = 0.028) scores were higher in the PCO group before surgery. When adjusting for the use of an anterior approach, there was no significant difference in 1-year postoperative cSVA (35.7 and 35.6 cm, respectively; p = 0.969), C2-7 lordosis (13.7° and 10.1°, respectively; p = 0.393), and patient-reported outcome measures (NRS, NDI, and mJOA) between the PCO and noPCO groups. Two-year radiographic outcomes were largely similar, except for C2 slope, which was higher in the PCO group (29.1° vs 18°, p = 0.026). The overall complication rates progressively increased with more complex osteotomy use (noPCO 68.8% vs PCO 71.9% vs 3CO 75%) but did not reach significance (p = 0.063). The use of POs for mild flexible adult CD may not be necessary to achieve desirable radiographic correction. They are associated with greater EBL and fusion burden. Further studies are needed to fully delineate the risks of adverse events for various types of osteotomies.

Surgical Treatment Strategies for Ankylosing Spondylitis with “Folded Man” Deformity: A Single-Center Retrospective Case Series Study

Ankylosing spondylitis (AS) combined with severe kyphotic deformity can cause the trunk to collapse, pressing tightly against the front of the thighs and forming a "folded man" deformity. The purpose of this article is to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of a treatment strategy for correcting the "folded man" deformity. A retrospective study was conducted to analyze 12 AS patients with "folded man" deformity treated at our hospital with staged kyphosis correction in the lateral position, followed by total hip arthroplasty, from May 2018 to July 2021. Global kyphosis (GK), thoracic kyphosis, lumbar lordosis, sagittal vertical axis, chin-brow vertical angle, and Scoliosis Research Society-22 Patient Questionnaire scores were compared preoperation and postoperation. Surgical duration, positioning time, blood loss, and complications were also recorded and analyzed. All patients demonstrated a correction of the "folded man" deformity, achieving sagittal balance and horizontal gaze with mild complications. Postoperatively, there were significant improvements in spinal sagittal parameters (GK, thoracic kyphosis, lumbar lordosis, and sagittal vertical axis) and chin-brow vertical angle compared to preoperative values (P < 0.05). The preoperative GK of 139.6 ± 9.1° was corrected to 55.3 ± 5.7° postoperatively, with a mean correction of 84.3°. The standardized treatment strategy involving staged correction of spinal kyphosis in a lateral position, followed by subsequent total hip arthroplasty, offers a safe and effective solution for managing AS with "folded man" deformity.

P235. Chin-Brow vertical angle is not consistently reliable for surgical planning in thoracolumbar kyphosis secondary to ankylosing spondylitis

P235. Chin-Brow vertical angle is not consistently reliable for surgical planning in thoracolumbar kyphosis secondary to ankylosing spondylitis

Horizontal Gaze Assessment: An Extensive Narrative Review

Bipedalism was a significant milestone in the evolutionary development of Homo sapiens sapiens, influencing neocortical evolution and subsequent behavioral changes. Coordinated visual and sensory inputs are crucial for posture, environmental interaction, and surgical planning, with horizontal gaze being a pivotal parameter. This narrative review aims to explore various geometric measures used to assess horizontal gaze in patients, highlighting their applications in surgical planning. A literature review was conducted in indexed databases using Mesh terms like "Cervical Vertebrae" and "Visual Fields" along with keywords such as "horizontal gaze" and "sagittal spine parameters." Among 477 initially identified articles, 41 were selected for inclusion after rigorous filtering. The most recognized method for assessing horizontal gaze is the Chin Brow Vertical Angle (CBVA), initially described in patients with ankylosing spondylitis. Clinical photography is employed as a tool for CBVA calculation, while other measures like McGregor slope and Slope of the Line of Sight have been considered as alternatives to CBVA. Each method presents its unique advantages and limitations. This review highlights the need for further research into horizontal gaze measurement methods. Developing novel approaches to determine horizontal gaze can significantly enhance surgical planning and, consequently, improve patient outcomes. The ongoing exploration of these geometric measures offers promising prospects for advancing the field and optimizing patient care.

Cervical Sagittal Alignment and Related Factor Analysis and Prediction Model in Patients Undergoing Revision Surgery After Anterior Cervical Fusion.

Patients with myelopathy or radiculopathy commonly undergo anterior cervical fusion surgery (ACFS), which has a notable failure rate on occasion. The goal of this study was to compare revision and nonrevision surgery patients in cervical sagittal alignment (CSA) subsequent to ACFS; additionally, to identify the best CSA parameters for predicting clinical outcome after ACFS; and furthermore, to create an equation model to assist surgeons in making decisions on patients undergoing ACFS. The data of 99 patients with symptomatic cervical myelopathy/radiculopathy who underwent ACFS were analyzed. Patients were divided into group A (underwent revision surgery after the first surgery failed) and group B (underwent only the first surgery). We measured and analyzed both preoperative and postoperative CSA parameters, including C2 slope, T1 slope, cervical lordosis C2-C7 (CL), C2-C7 sagittal vertical axis (C2C7 SVA), occiput-C2 lordosis angle (C0-C2), and chin brow vertical angle, and we further computed the correlation between the CSA parameters and created a prediction model. The (T1S-CL)-C2S mismatch differed significantly between groups A and B ([9.95 ± 9.95] 0 , [3.79 ± 6.58] 0 , P < 0.05, respectively). A significant correlation was observed between C2 slope and T1CL in group B relative to group A postoperatively (R 2 = 0.42 versus R 2 = 0.09, respectively). Compared with group B, patients in group A had significantly higher C2C7SVA values, more levels of fusion, and more smokers. The sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, and discrimination of the model were, respectively, 73.5%, 84%, 78.8%, and 85.65%. The causes of revision surgery in cervical myelopathic patients after anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion/anterior cervical diskectomy and fusion are multifactorial. (T1S-CL)-C2S mismatch and high C2C7SVA are the best cervical sagittal parameters that increase the odds of revision surgery, and the effect is more enhanced when comorbidities such as smoking, low bone-mineral density, and increased levels of fusion are taken into account.

Multiple three-column osteotomies successfully correcting cervicothoracic kyphosis in the setting of ankylosing spondylitis: illustrative case.

Ankylosing spondylitis (AS) is an autoimmune spondylarthritis often associated with rigid kyphoscoliosis. The authors describe a surgical approach that employs multilevel three-column osteotomies for the restoration of normal global alignment. A 48-year-old male with a past medical history of AS presented to the clinic with a stooped-over posture: his chin-brow vertical angle (CBVA) was 58.0°; T1 slope (T1S), 97.8°; thoracic kyphosis (TK; T1-12), 94.2°; proximal TK (T1-5), 50.8°; distal TK (T5-12), 43.5°; and sagittal vertical axis (SVA), 22.6 cm. A two-stage procedure was planned. During stage 1, instrumentation was placed from C5 to T10, followed by a T3 vertebral column resection. During stage 2, bilateral pedicle screws were placed from T11 to the pelvis. An L3 pedicle subtraction osteotomy (PSO) was completed and was followed by a T7 PSO. Postoperatively, the patient had significant postural improvement: CBVA was 29.3°; T1S, 57.8°; TK, 77.3°; proximal TK, 33.5°; distal TK, 43.8°; and SVA, 15 cm. At 6 years postoperatively, the patient continued to do well and was without evidence of construct breakdown. The authors propose that multilevel three-column osteotomies, if optimally located, successfully correct spinal malalignment associated with AS.

Multilevel Pedicle Subtraction Osteotomy for Correction of Thoracolumbar Kyphosis in Ankylosing Spondylitis: Clinical Effect and Biomechanical Evaluation.

To compare the clinical outcomes and biomechanical characteristics of 1-, 2-, and 3-level pedicle subtraction osteotomy (PSO), and establish selection criteria based on preoperative radiographic parameters. Patients undergone PSO to treat ankylosing spondylitis from February 2009 to May 2019 in Sun Yat-sen Memorial Hospital of Sun Yat-sen University were enrolled. According to the quantity of osteotomy performed, the participants were divided into group A (1-level PSO, n = 24), group B (2-level PSO, n = 19), and group C (3-level PSO, n = 11). Clinical outcomes were assessed before surgery and at the final follow-up. Comparisons of the radiographic parameters and quality-of-life indicators were performed among and within these groups, and the selection criteria were established by regression. Finite element analysis was conducted to compare the biomechanical characteristics of the spine treated with different quantity of osteotomies under different working conditions. Three-level PSO improved the sagittal parameters more significantly, but resulted in longer operative time and greater blood loss (p < 0.05). Greater stress was found in the proximal screws and proximal junction area of the vertebra in the model simulating 1-level PSO. Larger stress of screws and vertebra was observed at the distal end in the model simulating 3-level PSO. Multilevel PSO works better for larger deformity correction than single-level PSO by allowing greater sagittal parameter correction and obtaining a better distribution of stress in the hardware construct, although with longer operation time and greater blood loss. Three-level osteotomy is recommended for the patients with preoperative of global kyphosis > 85.95°, T1 pelvic angle > 62.3°, sagittal vertical alignment > 299.55 mm, and pelvic tilt+ chin-brow vertical angle > 109.6°.

Postoperative quality of life in patients with ankylosing spondylitis and thoracolumbar kyphosis: risk factors and personalized sagittal reconstruction strategy.

The aim of this study was to investigate the factors affecting postoperative quality of life in patients with ankylosing spondylitis (AS) and thoracolumbar kyphosis (TLK), and establish a personalized sagittal reconstruction strategy. Patients with AS and TLK who underwent pedicle subtraction osteotomy (PSO) from February 2009 to May 2019 were retrospectively included. Quality of life and spinal sagittal radiographic parameters were collected before surgery and at the last follow-up. Patients were divided into two groups based on the attainment of minimal clinically important difference (MCID) on the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index and Oswestry Disability Index. Comparisons of radiographic parameters and clinical outcomes were conducted between and within groups. Regression analysis was used to identify the risk factors within the missing MCID cohort. Sagittal reconstruction equations were established using the pelvic incidence (PI) and thoracic inlet angle (TIA) in the reached MCID cohort. The study comprised 82 participants. Significant improvements were observed in most radiographic parameters and all quality-of-life indicators during the final follow-up compared with the preoperative measures (p < 0.05). Factors including cervical lordosis (CL) ≥ 18° (OR 9.75, 95% CI 2.26-58.01, p = 0.005), chin-brow vertical angle (CBVA) ≥ 25° (OR 14.7, 95% CI 3.29-91.21, p = 0.001), and pelvic tilt (PT) ≥ 33° (OR 21.77, 95% CI 5.92-103.44, p < 0.001) independently correlated with a failure to attain MCID (p < 0.05). Sagittal realignment targets were constructed as follows: sacral slope (SS) = 0.84 PI - 17.4° (R2 = 0.81, p < 0.001), thoracic kyphosis (TK) = 0.51 PI + 10.8° (R2 = 0.46, p = 0.002), neck tilt (NT) = 0.52 TIA - 5.8° (R2 = 0.49, p < 0.001), and T1 slope (T1S) = 0.48 TIA + 5.8° (R2 = 0.45, p = 0.002). PSO proved efficacious in treating AS complicated by TLK, yielding favorable outcomes. CBVA ≥ 25°, CL ≥ 18°, and PT ≥ 33° were the primary factors affecting postoperative quality of life in patients with AS. The personalized sagittal reconstruction strategy in this study focused on the subjective sensations and daily needs of patients with AS, which were delineated by the equations SS = 0.84 PI - 17.4°, TK = 0.51 PI + 10.8°, NT = 0.52 TIA - 5.8°, and T1S = 0.48 TIA + 5.8°.

The impact of baseline cervical malalignment on the development of proximal junctional kyphosis following surgical correction of thoracolumbar adult spinal deformity.

The objective of this study was to identify the effect of baseline cervical deformity (CD) on proximal junctional kyphosis (PJK) and proximal junctional failure (PJF) in patients with adult spinal deformity (ASD). This study was a retrospective analysis of a prospectively collected, multicenter database comprising ASD patients enrolled at 13 participating centers from 2009 to 2018. Included were ASD patients aged > 18 years with concurrent CD (C2-7 kyphosis < -15°, T1S minus cervical lordosis > 35°, C2-7 sagittal vertical axis > 4 cm, chin-brow vertical angle > 25°, McGregor's slope > 20°, or C2-T1 kyphosis > 15° across any three vertebrae) who underwent surgery. Patients were grouped according to four deformity classification schemes: Ames and Passias CD modifiers, sagittal morphotypes as described by Kim et al., and the head versus trunk balance system proposed by Mizutani et al. Mean comparison tests and multivariable binary logistic regression analyses were performed to assess the impact of these deformity classifications on PJK and PJF rates up to 3 years following surgery. A total of 712 patients with concurrent ASD and CD met the inclusion criteria (mean age 61.7 years, 71% female, mean BMI 28.2 kg/m2, and mean Charlson Comorbidity Index 1.90) and underwent surgery (mean number of levels fused 10.1, mean estimated blood loss 1542 mL, and mean operative time 365 minutes; 70% underwent osteotomy). By approach, 59% of the patients underwent a posterior-only approach and 41% underwent a combined approach. Overall, 277 patients (39.1%) had PJK by 1 year postoperatively, and an additional 189 patients (26.7%) developed PJK by 3 years postoperatively. Overall, 65 patients (9.2%) had PJF by 3 years postoperatively. Patients classified as having a cervicothoracic deformity morphotype had higher rates of early PJK than flat neck deformity and cervicothoracic deformity patients (p = 0.020). Compared with the head-balanced patients, trunk-balanced patients had higher rates of PJK and PJF (both p < 0.05). Examining Ames modifier severity showed that patients with moderate and severe deformity by the horizontal gaze modifier had higher rates of PJK (p < 0.001). In patients with concurrent cervical and thoracolumbar deformities undergoing isolated thoracolumbar correction, the use of CD classifications allows for preoperative assessment of the potential for PJK and PJF that may aid in determining the correction of extending fusion levels.

Are we improving in the optimization of surgery for high-risk adult cervical spine deformity patients over time?

The aim of this study was to investigate whether surgery for high-risk patients is being optimized over time and if poor outcomes are being minimized. Patients who underwent surgery for cervical deformity (CD) and were ≥ 18 years with baseline and 2-year data were stratified by year of surgery from 2013 to 2018. The cohort was divided into two groups based on when the surgery was performed. Patients in the early cohort underwent surgery between 2013 and 2015 and those in the recent cohort underwent surgery between 2016 and 2018. High-risk patients met at least 2 of the following criteria: 1) baseline C2-7 Cobb angle > 15°, mismatch between T1 slope and cervical lordosis ≥ 35°, C2-7 sagittal vertical axis > 4 cm, or chin-brow vertical angle > 25°; 2) age ≥ 70 years; 3) severe baseline frailty (Miller index); 4) Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) ≥ 1 SD above the mean; 5) three-column osteotomy as treatment; and 6) fusion > 10 levels or > 7 levels for elderly patients. The mean comparison analysis assessed differences between groups. Stepwise multivariable linear regression described associations between increasing year of surgery and complications. Eighty-two CD patients met high-risk criteria (mean age 62.11 ± 10.87 years, 63.7% female, mean BMI 29.70 ± 8.16 kg/m2, and mean CCI 1.07 ± 1.45). The proportion of high-risk patients increased with time, with 41.8% of patients in the early cohort classified as high risk compared with 47.6% of patients in the recent cohort (p > 0.05). Recent high-risk patients were more likely to be female (p = 0.008), have a lower BMI (p = 0.038), and have a higher baseline CCI (p = 0.013). Surgically, high-risk patients in the recent cohort were more likely to undergo low-grade osteotomy (p = 0.003). By postoperative complications, recent high-risk patients were less likely to experience any postoperative adverse events overall (p = 0.020) or complications such as dysphagia (p = 0.045) at 2 years. Regression analysis revealed increasing year of surgery to be correlated with decreasing minor complication rates (p = 0.030), as well as lowered rates of distal junctional kyphosis by 2 years (p = 0.048). Over time, high-risk CD patients have an increase in frequency and comorbidity rates but have demonstrated improved postoperative outcomes. These findings suggest that spine surgeons have improved over time in optimizing selection and reducing potential adverse events in high-risk patients.

Staged osteotomy in lateral position for the treatment of severe kyphotic deformity secondary to ankylosing spondylitis: a retrospective study

BackgroundPatients with severe kyphotic deformity (Cobb > 100°) secondary to ankylosing spondylitis (AS) occasionally cannot undergo corrective surgery in the prone position. Osteotomy in the lateral position might provide a possible solution. In this study, we aim to evaluate the clinical efficacy and safety of staged osteotomy in the lateral position for the treatment of AS-related severe kyphosis with a minimum of 2-year follow-up.MethodsIn total, 23 patients who underwent staged osteotomy in the lateral position from October 2015 to June 2017 were analyzed. In the first stage of surgery, all but one patient underwent a single-level Ponte osteotomy, which was followed by a pedicle subtraction osteotomy in the second stage. Mean follow-up was 30.8 ± 4.6 months. Global kyphosis (GK), thoracic kyphosis (TK), lumbar lordosis (LL), sagittal vertical axis (SVA), osteotomized vertebra intervertebral angle (OVI), chin-brow vertical angle (CBVA), Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) score and Scoliosis Research Society-22 Patient Questionnaire (SRS-22) were all compared pre- and postoperation.ResultsAll kyphosis parameters were significantly improved (all P < 0.05). GK was corrected from 115.0 ± 13.4° to 46.5 ± 9.0° postoperatively, with a mean correction of 68.5°. SVA was improved from 21.2 ± 5.1 cm to 5.1 ± 1.8 cm postoperatively. After surgery, CBVA was adjusted from 64.1 ± 23.2° to 5.7 ± 10.6° and OVI was changed from 9.0 ± 2.7° to − 20.1 ± 5.6°. Both the ODI and SRS-22 showed substantial improvements (all P < 0.05). Four patients with mild complications were observed perioperatively.ConclusionIn AS patients with severe kyphosis, satisfactory correction can be safely achieved with staged osteotomy in the lateral position, which can not only correct the sagittal imbalance of the spine with acceptable complications but also facilitate the placement of the intraoperative position.

Application of vertebral body compression osteotomy in pedicle subtraction osteotomy on ankylosing spondylitis kyphosis: Finite element analysis and retrospective study.

Ankylosing spondylitis (AS) is a chronic inflammatory rheumatic disease, with pathological characteristics of bone erosion, inflammation of attachment point, and bone ankylosis. Due to the ossified intervertebral disc and ligament, pedicle subtraction osteotomy (PSO) is one of the mainstream surgeries of AS-related thoracolumbar kyphosis, but the large amount of blood loss and high risk of instrumental instability limit its clinical application. The purpose of our study is to propose a new transpedicular vertebral body compression osteotomy (VBCO) in PSO to reduce blood loss and improve stability. A retrospective analysis was performed on patients with AS-related thoracolumbar kyphosis who underwent one-level PSO in our hospital from February 2009 to May 2019.A total of 31 patients were included in this study; 6 received VBCO and 25 received eggshell vertebral body osteotomy. We collected demographic data containing gender and age at diagnosis. Surgical data contained operation time, estimated blood loss (EBL), and complications. Radiographic data contained pre-operative and follow-up sagittal parameters including chin brow-vertical angle (CBVA), global kyphosis (GK), thoracic kyphosis (TK), and lumbar lordosis (LL). A typical case with L2-PSO was used to establish a finite element model. The mechanical characteristics of the internal fixation device, vertebral body, and osteotomy plane of the two osteotomy models were analyzed under different working conditions. The VBCO could provide comparable restoring of CBVA, GK, TK, and LL in the eggshell osteotomy procedure (all p > 0.05). The VBCO significantly reduced EBL compared to those with eggshell osteotomy [800.0ml (500.0-1,439.5 ml) vs. 1,455.5 ml (1,410.5-1,497.8 ml), p = 0.033]. Compared with the eggshell osteotomy, VBCO showed better mechanical property. For the intra-pedicular screw fixation, the VBCO group had a more average distributed and lower stress condition on both nails and connecting rod. VBCO had a flattened osteotomy plane than the pitted osteotomy plane of the eggshell group, showing a lower and more average distributed maximum stress and displacement of osteotomy plane. In our study, we introduced VBCO as an improved method in PSO, with advantages in reducing blood loss and providing greater stability. Further investigation should focus on clinical research and biomechanical analysis for the application of VBCO.

Spinopelvic sagittal compensation in adult cervical deformity.

The objective of this study was to evaluate spinopelvic sagittal alignment and spinal compensatory changes in adult cervical kyphotic deformity. A database composed of 13 US spine centers was retrospectively reviewed for adult patients who underwent cervical reconstruction with radiographic evidence of cervical kyphotic deformity: C2-7 sagittal vertical axis > 4 cm, chin-brow vertical angle > 25°, or cervical kyphosis (T1 slope [T1S] cervical lordosis [CL] > 15°) (n = 129). Sagittal parameters were evaluated preoperatively and in the early postoperative window (6 weeks to 6 months postoperatively) and compared with asymptomatic control patients. Adult cervical deformity patients were further stratified by degree of cervical kyphosis (severe kyphosis, C2-T3 Cobb angle ≤ -30°; moderate kyphosis, ≤ 0°; and minimal kyphosis, > 0°) and severity of sagittal malalignment (severe malalignment, sagittal vertical axis T3-S1 ≤ -60 mm; moderate malalignment, ≤ 20 mm; and minimal malalignment > 20 mm). Compared with asymptomatic control patients, cervical deformity was associated with increased C0-2 lordosis (32.9° vs 23.6°), T1S (33.5° vs 28.0°), thoracolumbar junction kyphosis (T10-L2 Cobb angle -7.0° vs -1.7°), and pelvic tilt (PT) (19.7° vs 15.9°) (p < 0.01). Cervicothoracic kyphosis was correlated with C0-2 lordosis (R = -0.57, p < 0.01) and lumbar lordosis (LL) (R = -0.20, p = 0.03). Cervical reconstruction resulted in decreased C0-2 lordosis, increased T1S, and increased thoracic and thoracolumbar junction kyphosis (p < 0.01). Patients with severe cervical kyphosis (n = 34) had greater C0-2 lordosis (p < 0.01) and postoperative reduction of C0-2 lordosis (p = 0.02) but no difference in PT. Severe cervical kyphosis was also associated with a greater increase in thoracic and thoracolumbar junction kyphosis postoperatively (p = 0.01). Patients with severe sagittal malalignment (n = 52) had decreased PT (p = 0.01) and increased LL (p < 0.01), as well as a greater postoperative reduction in LL (p < 0.01). Adult cervical deformity is associated with upper cervical hyperlordotic compensation and thoracic hypokyphosis. In the setting of increased kyphotic deformity and sagittal malalignment, thoracolumbar junction kyphosis and lumbar hyperlordosis develop to restore normal center of gravity. There was no consistent compensatory pelvic retroversion or anteversion among the adult cervical deformity patients in this cohort.

Do the newly proposed realignment targets for C2 and T1 slope bridge the gap between radiographic and clinical success in corrective surgery for adult cervical deformity?

Surgical correction of cervical deformity (CD) has been associated with superior alignment and functional outcomes. It has not yet been determined whether baseline or postoperative T1 slope (T1S) and C2 slope (C2S) correlate with health-related quality-of-life (HRQoL) metrics and radiographic complications, such as distal junctional kyphosis (DJK) and distal junctional failure (DJF). The objective of this study was to determine the impact of T1S and C2S deformity severity on HRQoL metrics and DJF development in patients with CD who underwent a cervical fusion procedure. All operative CD patients with upper instrumented vertebra above C7 and preoperative (baseline) and up to 2-year postoperative radiographic and HRQoL data were included. CD was defined as meeting at least one of the following radiographic parameters: C2-7 lordosis < -15°, TS1-cervical lordosis mismatch > 35°, segmental cervical kyphosis > 15° across any 3 vertebrae between C2 and T1, C2-7 sagittal vertical axis > 4 cm, McGregor's slope > 20°, or chin-brow vertical angle > 25°. Spearman's rank-order correlation and linear regression analysis assessed the impact of T1S and C2S on HRQoL metrics (Neck Disability Index [NDI], modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association [mJOA] scale, EuroQOL 5-Dimension Questionnaire [EQ-5D] visual analog scale [VAS] score, and numeric rating scale [NRS]-neck) and complications (DJK, DJF, reoperation). Logistic regression and a conditional inference tree (CIT) were used to determine radiographic thresholds for achieving optimal clinical outcome, defined as meeting good clinical outcome criteria (≥ 2 of the following: NDI < 20 or meeting minimal clinically important difference, mild myelopathy [mJOA score ≥ 14], and NRS-neck ≤ 5 or improved by ≥ 2 points), not undergoing reoperation, or developing DJF or mechanical complication by 2 years. One hundred five patients with CD met inclusion criteria. By surgical approach, 14.7% underwent an anterior-only approach, 46.1% a posterior-only approach, and 39.2% combined anterior and posterior approaches. The mean baseline radiographic parameters were T1S 28.3° ± 14.5° and C2S 25.9° ± 17.5°. Significant associations were found between 3-month C2S and mJOA score (r = -0.248, p = 0.034), NDI (r = 0.399, p = 0.001), EQ-5D VAS (r = -0.532, p < 0.001), NRS-neck (r = 0.239, p = 0.040), and NRS-back (r = 0.264, p = 0.021), while significant correlation was also found between 3-month T1S and mJOA score (r = -0.314, p = 0.026), NDI (r = 0.445, p = 0.001), EQ-5D VAS (r = -0.347, p = 0.018), and NRS-neck (r = 0.269, p = 0.049). A significant correlation was also found between development of DJF and 3-month C2S (odds ratio [OR] 1.1, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.01-1.1, p = 0.015) as well as for T1S (OR 1.1, 95% CI 1.01-1.1, p = 0.023). Logistic regression with CIT identified thresholds for optimal outcome by 2 years: optimal 3-month T1S < 26° (OR 5.6) and C2S < 10° (OR 10.4), severe 3-month T1S < 45.5° (OR 0.2) and C2S < 38.0° (no patient above this threshold achieved optimal outcome; all p < 0.05). Patients below both optimal thresholds achieved rates of 0% for DJK and DJF, and 100% met optimal outcome. The severity of CD, defined by T1S and C2S at baseline and especially at 3 months, can be predictive of postoperative functional improvement and occurrence of worrisome complications in patients with CD, necessitating the use of thresholds in surgical planning to achieve optimal outcomes.

Iatrogenic Fracture in a Patient of Ankylosing Spondylitis Planned for Surgical Correction of Chin-on-Chest Deformity

Ankylosing spondylitis (AS) is a progressive systemic chronic inflammatory rheumatic disease that causes arthritis of spine and sacroiliac joints and finally results in contracture or bony fusion of these joints. The ankylosed spine has increased propensity to fracture due to rigidity, long lever arms, and osteoporosis. However, iatrogenic fracture occurring in AS patients with chin-on-chest deformity during positioning has not been reported. A 46-year-old male, known case of AS, presented with progressive deformity of neck for the last 6 months due to C5 fracture with C4/5 dislocation. He had chin-on-chest deformity with chin-brow vertical angle of 106o with spastic tetraparesis (mJOA score 6, Nurick grade-3). The patient was put on sustained halo-gravity traction by gradually increasing the weight up to 30 lbs for 4 weeks and then was planned for deformity correction. After intubation and application of same traction, we found anterior wedge opening and fracture through C6/7 disc space. His neurology was found to be same as in the preoperative state on neural monitoring and wake up test. Front and back instrumented fusion was done with anterior bone grafting. Postoperatively, he was maintained on halo-vest immobilization for three months. By the end of first year, the fracture had united well and he was mobilizing well with mJOA score 13 and Nurick grade-1. AS patients are at higher risk of fracture and need utmost care while positioning during surgery. Traction or any corrective maneuver must be done carefully.

Prioritization of Realignment Associated With Superior Clinical Outcomes for Cervical Deformity Patients.

ObjectiveTo prioritize the cervical parameter targets for alignment. MethodsIncluded: cervical deformity (CD) patients (C2–7 Cobb angle > 10°, cervical lordosis > 10°, cervical sagittal vertical axis [cSVA] > 4 cm, or chin-brow vertical angle > 25°) with full baseline (BL) and 1-year (1Y) radiographic parameters and Neck Disability Index (NDI) scores; patients with cervical [C] or cervicothoracic [CT] Primary Driver Ames type. Patients with BL Ames classified as low CD for both parameters of cSVA (< 4 cm) and T1 slope minus cervical lordosis (TS–CL) (< 15°) were excluded. Patients assessed: meeting minimum clinically important differences (MCID) for NDI (< -15 ΔNDI). Ratios of correction were found for regional parameters categorized by primary Ames driver (C or CT). Decision tree analysis assessed cutoffs for differences associated with meeting NDI MCID at 1Y. ResultsSeventy-seven CD patients (mean age, 62.1 years; 64% female; body mass index, 28.8 kg/m2). Forty-one point six percent of patients met MCID for NDI. A backwards linear regression model including radiographic differences as predictors from BL to 1Y for meeting MCID for NDI demonstrated an R2 of 0.820 (p=0.032) included TS–CL, cSVA, McGregor’s slope (MGS), C2 sacral slope, C2–T3 angle, C2–T3 SVA, cervical lordosis. By primary Ames driver, 67.5% of patients were C, and 32.5% CT. Ratios of change in predictors for MCID NDI patients for C and CT were not significant between the 2 groups (p>0.050). Decision tree analysis determined cutoffs for radiographic change, prioritizing in the following order: ≥ 42.5° C2–T3 angle, > 35.4° cervical lordosis, < -31.76° C2 slope, < -11.57-mm cSVA, < -2.16° MGS, > -30.8-mm C2–T3 SVA, and ≤ -33.6° TS–CL. ConclusionCertain ratios of correction of cervical parameters contribute to improving neck disability. Prioritizing these radiographic alignment parameters may help optimize patient-reported outcomes for patients undergoing CD surgery.

An innovative adjustable prone positioning frame for treatment of severe kyphosis secondary to ankylosing spondylitis with two-level osteotomy.

This study aims to introduce an innovative adjustable prone positioning frame (APPF) and explore its feasibility and safety for treatment of severe kyphosis secondary to ankylosing spondylitis (AS) with two-level osteotomy. A retrospective, non-controlled study was conducted to illustrate the process where 13 patients diagnosed with severe kyphosis secondary to AS received operations on the APPF. Parameters of chin brow vertical angle (CBVA), global kyphosis (GK), thoracolumbar kyphosis (TLK), lumbar lordosis (LL) and sagittal vertical axis (SVA) were measured. Positioning time, operation time, intraoperative blood loss aḥd complications were also determined. The Scoliosis Research Society outcomes instrument (SRS-22) was applied for clinical assessment. All patients were placed on the APPF successfully with the positioning time of 2.92 ± 0.76min, received operation with 457.00 ± 88.04min and had blood loss of 2330.77 ± 1423.25ml. Four cases experienced pain due to tensional skin of the abdomen and one case suffered cerebrospinal fluid leakage postoperatively, but these patients were all cured conservatively. No neurological complications were observed, although sagittal translation occurred in four patients. Significant improvements were detected in CBVA, GK, TLK, LL and SVA postoperatively (P<0.05), but no significant difference was observed between postoperation and the final follow-up (P>0.05). The SRS-22 scores at 2 years after operation were significantly higher than those before operation (P<0.05). The innovative APPF provided great convenience to place patients with severe kyphosis secondary to AS in a prone position. Performing two-level osteotomy with the aid of APPF is safe, feasible and effective.

At What Point Should the Thoracolumbar Region Be Addressed in Patients Undergoing Corrective Cervical Deformity Surgery?

Retrospective cohort study. The aim of this study was to investigate the impact of cervical to thoracolumbar ratios on poor outcomes in cervical deformity (CD) corrective surgery. Consideration of distal regional and global alignment is a critical determinant of outcomes in CD surgery. For operative CD patients, it is unknown whether certain thoracolumbar parameters play a significant role in poor outcomes and whether addressing such parameters is warranted. Included: surgical CD patients (C2-C7 Cobb >10°, cervical lordosis [CL] >10°, C2-C7 sagittal vertical axis (cSVA) >4 cm, or chin-brow vertical angle >25°) with baseline and 1-year data. Patients were assessed for ratios of preop cervical and global parameters including: C2 Slope/T1 slope, T1 slope minus C2-C7 lordosis (TS-CL)/mismatch between pelvic incidence and lumbar lordosis (PI-LL), cSVA/sagittal vertical axis (SVA). Deformity classification ratios of cervical (Ames-ISSG) to spinopelvic (SRS-Schwab) were investigated: cSVA modifier/SVA modifier, TS-CL modifier/PI-LL modifier. Cervical to thoracic ratios included C2-C7 lordosis/T4-T12 kyphosis. Correlations assessed the relationship between ratios and poor outcomes (major complication, reoperation, distal junctional kyphosis (DJK), or failure to meet minimal clinically important difference [MCID]). Decision tree analysis through multiple iterations of multivariate regressions assessed cut-offs for ratios for acquiring suboptimal outcomes. A total of 110 CD patients were included (61.5 years, 66% F, 28.8 kg/m2). Mean preoperative radiographic ratios calculated: C2 slope/T1 slope of 1.56, TS-CL/PI-LL of 11.1, cSVA/SVA of 5.4, CL/thoracic kyphosis (TK) of 0.26. Ames-ISSG and SRS-Schwab modifier ratios: cSVA/SVA of 0.1 and TS-CL/PI-LL of 0.35. Pearson correlations demonstrated a relationship between major complications and baseline TS-CL/PI-LL, Ames TS-CL/Schwab PI-LL modifiers, and the CL/TK ratios (P < 0.050). Reoperation had significant correlation with TS-CL/PI-LL and cSVA/SVA ratios. Postoperative DJK correlated with C2 slope/T1 slope and CL/TK ratios. Not meeting MCID for Neck Disability Index (NDI) correlated with CL/TK ratio and not meeting MCID for EQ5D correlated with Ames TS-CL/Schwab PI-LL. Consideration of cervical to global alignment is a critical determinant of outcomes in CD corrective surgery. Key ratios of cervical to global alignment correlate with suboptimal clinical outcomes. A larger cervical lordosis to TK predicted postoperative complication, DJK, and not meeting MCID for NDI.Level of Evidence: 4.