Chimney Test Research Articles

Effect of 5-fluoroindole-2-carboxylic acid (an antagonist of the NMDA receptor-associated glycine site) on the anticonvulsive activity of conventional antiepileptic drugs.

5-Fluoroindole-2-carboxylic acid, an antagonist of the glycine site within the NMDA receptor complex, administered intraperitoneally in doses of 150 and 200 mg/kg, 120 min before electroconvulsions, significantly raised the convulsive threshold from 6.8 to 7.9 and 8.3 mA, respectively. At lower doses, it did not influence the threshold. However, lethality was observed 24h after administration of the threshold-elevating doses of this glycine site antagonist. 5-Fluoroindole-2-carboxylic acid (100 mg/kg), applied together with carbamazepine, valproate or phenobarbital, significantly reduced their ED50 values against maximal electroshock - from 13.9 to 7.5 mg/kg, from 291 to 242 mg/kg, and from 18.6 to 11.1 mg/kg, respectively. At the dose of 50 mg/kg, it also potentiated the protective activity of carbamazepine. However, 5-fluoroindole-2-carboxylic acid, up to 100 mg/kg, did not affect the anti-convulsive activity of diphenylhydantoin. When applied at doses equal to their ED50 values against maximal electroshock-induced convulsions, carbamazepine (13.9 mg/kg), phenobarbital (18.6 mg/kg) and valproate (291 mg/kg) did not affect the motor performance of mice in the chimney test. 5-Fluoroindole-2-carboxylic acid (100 mg/kg produced a significant motor impairment, at 50 mg/kg it did not affect the motor performance. The combined treatment of 5-fluoroindole-2-carboxylic acid (100 mg/kg) with carbamazepine, phenobarbital or valproate, providing a 50% protection against maximal electroshock, resulted in motor impairment. Only the combination of 5-fluoroindole-2-carboxylic acid (50 mg/kg) with carbamazepine (8.6 mg/kg) did not significantly influence this parameter. Almost all of the antiepileptic drugs studied, when administered at doses equal to their ED50 values against maximal electroshock, did not influence retention in the passive avoidance task, which is a measure of long-term memory. Only valproate (291 mg/kg) worsened long-term memory. The combined treatment of 5-fluoroindole-2-carboxylic acid (100 mg/kg) with carbamazepine or phenobarbital, providing a 50% protection against maximal electroshock, did not affect the retention. The combination of 5-fluoroindole-2-carboxylic acid (100 mg/kg) with valproate (242 mg/kg) caused a significant impairment of long-term memory and mortality of 50% of animals 24h following the administration. The results suggest that the blockade of the strychnine-insensitive glycine site may lead to an enhancement of the protective activity of some conventional antiepileptic drugs, which is associated with pronounced side-effects and lethality in some cases.

EFFECT OF NON-STEROIDAL ANTI-INFLAMMATORY DRUGS ON THE ANTICONVULSIVE ACTIVITY OF VALPROATE AND DIPHENYLHYDANTOIN AGAINST MAXIMAL ELECTROSHOCK-INDUCED SEIZURES IN MICE

Prostaglandins and their inhibitors may affect convulsive phenomena. Thus, the aim of this study was to examine possible interactions between non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs and two conventional antiepileptic drugs in terms of their anticonvulsive activity and side-effects. Also, the plasma levels of antiepileptics were measured in order to delineate possible pharmacokinetic interactions. The following non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) were studied: acetylsalicylic acid, ibuprofen, indomethacin, metamizole, paracetamol and piroxicam. None of these drugs affected the threshold for electroconvulsions. However, all NSAIDs studied enhanced the protective activity of valproate magnesium against maximal electroshock-induced seizures. Only ibuprofen and piroxicam enhanced the anticonvulsive activity of diphenylhydantoin. Ibuprofen decreased the ED50value of valproate (for the induction of motor impairment) in the rotorod test, whilst piroxicam reduced the ED50value of valproate in rotorod and chimney tests. Diphenylhydantoin combined with either ibuprofen or piroxicam did not cause any motor impairment in these tests. The total plasma level of valproate and free plasma level of diphenylhydantoin remained unchanged in the presence of all studied NSAIDs. These data demonstrate that NSAIDs could enhance the protective activity of antiepileptics. However, in case of valproate it may be associated with the severe side effects.

GYKI 52466 [1-(4-aminophenyl)-4-methoxy-7,8-methylenedioxy-5H-2,3-benzodiazepine hydrochloride] and the anticonvulsive activity of conventional antiepileptics against pentetrazol in mice.

Excitatory amino acids participate in the generation of seizure activity. Consequently, the effects of GYKI 52466 [1-(4-aminophenyl)-4-methoxy-7,8-methylenedioxy-5H-2,3-benzodiazepine hydrochloride], an antagonist of glutamate-mediated events, on the protective activity of conventional antiepileptic drugs against pentetrazol were studied. GYKI 52466 (up to 10 mg/kg, i.p.) did not affect the clonic phase of pentetrazol (injected s.c. at its CD97 of 90 mg/kg) convulsions. Only the antipentetrazol activity of valproate (100 mg/kg) was enhanced by GYKI 52466 (10 mg/kg)--the percentage of mice protected was significantly increased from 20 to 90%. The anticonvulsive activity of clonazepam (at 0.01), ethosuximide (at 50), and phenobarbital (at 2.5 mg/kg) was not modified by GYKI 52466 (up to 10 mg/kg). The combination of valproate (100 mg/kg) with GYKI 52466 (10 mg/kg) did not affect the performance of mice evaluated in the chimney test. However, this combination resulted in significant memory deficits, measured in the passive avoidance task. In no case did GYKI 52466 (10 mg/kg) affect either total or free plasma levels of antiepileptic drugs (as measured by immunofluorescence), so a pharmacokinetic interaction is not probable. Finally, the interaction of the non-NMDA receptor antagonist with antiepileptic drugs does not seem promising in the pentetrazol test, recognized as a model of human myoclonic epilepsy.

Anticonvulsant and Adverse Effects of MK-801, LY 235959, and GYKI 52466 in Combination with Ca 2+ Channel Inhibitors in Mice

This study was designed to investigate the influence of the calcium (Ca 2+) channel inhibitors nicardipine, nifedipine, and flunarizine on the protective action of MK-801, LY 235959 [ N-methyl- d-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonists], and GYKI 52466 (a non-NMDA receptor antagonist) against electroconvulsions in mice. Unlike nicardipine (15 mg/kg) or flunarizine (10 mg/kg), nifedipine (7.5 and 15 mg/kg) potentiated the protective potency of MK-801 (0.05 mg/kg), as reflected by significant elevation of the convulsive threshold (a CS 50 value of the current strength in mA producing tonic hind limb extension in 50% of the animals). The protective activity of LY 235959 and GYKI 52466 was reflected by their ED 50 values in mg/kg, at which the drugs were expected to protect 50% of mice against maximal electroshock-induced tonic extension of the hind limbs. Nicardipine (3.75–15 mg/kg), nifedipine (0.94–15 mg/kg), and flunarizine (2.5–10 mg/kg) in a dose-dependent manner markedly potentiated the antiseizure efficacy of LY 235959. Flunarizine (5 and 10 mg/kg) was the only Ca 2+ channel inhibitor to enhance the protective action of GYKI 52466 against electroconvulsions. Except with MK-801 + flunarizine (motor performance) or GYKI 52466 + flunarizine (long-term memory), combination of NMDA or non-NMDA receptor antagonists with Ca 2+ channel inhibitors produced an impairment of motor performance (evaluated in the chimney test) and long-term memory acquisition (measured in the passive avoidance task) as compared with vehicle treatment.

Influence of a potential anti-asthmatic drug, CR 2039, upon the anticonvulsive activity of conventional antiepileptics against maximal electroshock-induced seizures in mice.

CR 2039 [[4-(1H-tetrazol-5-yl)-N-(4-(1H-tetrazol-5-yl]phenylbenza m ide], in doses of 10, 50, and 100 mg/kg i.p., significantly elevated the threshold for electroconvulsions, increasing the CS50 (current strength 50% in mA) values from 6.3 to 7.2, 7.5, and 7.6 mA, respectively. When combined with carbamazepine, diphenylhydantoin, or valproate, CR 2039 (5 and 10 mg/kg) potentiated the anticonvulsive action of these antiepileptics against maximal electroshock-induced convulsions which was reflected by significant decreases in the respective ED50s (in mg/kg). The protective efficacy of phenobarbital was not affected by the phenylbenzamide derivative. The potentiation of the anticonvulsive activity of three antiepileptics was not accompanied by increased adverse effects, evaluated in the chimney test (motor coordination) and passive avoidance task (long-term memory). Finally, CR 2039 (10 mg/kg) did not alter the plasma levels of the antiepileptic drugs studied which speaks against a pharmacokinetic mechanism in the observed results. It is concluded that CR 2039 may prove a safer anti-asthmatic drug for the use in epileptic patients than aminophylline which, either acutely or chronically, considerably impaired the anticonvulsive activity of conventional antiepileptics.

Ca 2+ channel blockade and the antielectroshock activity of NMDA receptor antagonists, CGP 40116 and CGP 43487, in mice

Nicardipine, nifedipine and flunarizine showed anticonvulsive activity (reflected by significant elevations of the seizure threshold for tonic hindlimb extension) in doses of 20, 20 and 15 mg/kg, respectively. In combination studies, CGP 40116 [ d-( E)-2-amino-4-methyl-5-phosphono-3-pentenoic acid] or its methyl ester derivative (CGP 43487) was administered in a constant dose of 0.25 and 3.5 mg/kg, respectively. At these doses both competitive NMDA receptor antagonists were able to elevate significantly the convulsive threshold. Nicardipine, nifedipine, and flunarizine were administered at maximal doses (or lower) not affecting the convulsive threshold (15, 15 and 10 mg/kg, respectively). The protective activity of CGP 40116 and CGP 43487 was dose dependently potentiated by all three Ca 2+ channel inhibitors. The combined treatment caused motor impairments (evaluated in the chimney test) and long-term memory deficits (measured in the passive avoidance task) similar to these produced by CGP 40116 or CGP 43487 alone. Our results indicate that nicardipine, nifedipine and flunarizine significantly potentiate the protective activity, but not the adverse effects, of CGP 40116 and CGP 43487 in mice.

Studies on Some Psychopharmacological Actions ofMoringa oleifera Lam. (Moringaceae) Leaf Extract

The methanol extract of the leaves of Moringa oleifera Lam. was investigated for some psychopharmacological actions in animals. The extract was found to produce a significant alteration in general behavioural pattern by head dip test, Y-maze test, evasion test, and reduction in muscle relaxant activity by rotarod test, chimney test and traction test. Beside these, the extract also potentiated pentobarbitone induced sleeping time and lowered body temperature in experimental animals.

Influence of D-cycloserine on the anticonvulsant activity of phenytoin and carbamazepine against electroconvulsions in mice.

D-Cycloserine (DCS) is a high-efficacy partial agonist at the strychnine-insensitive glycine modulatory site within the N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA)-receptor/ionophore complex. Previous studies demonstrated that DCS exhibits anticonvulsant activity in a variety of experimental epilepsy models. In this study, we determined the influence of DCS in subprotective doses on the anticonvulsant action of phenytoin (PHT) and carbamazepine (CBZ) in mice. Two electroconvulsive tests were used, i.e., determination of seizure threshold and maximal electroshock seizures. Antiepileptic drug-induced motor and long-term memory deficits were quantified by using the chimney test and the passive-avoidance test, respectively. In addition, plasma levels of PHT and CBZ were measured by fluorescence polarization immunoassay to exclude any pharmacokinetic interactions. DCS, when used alone in doses of 80 and 160 mg/kg, significantly increased the threshold for electroconvulsive seizures. DCS in a wide range of doses (1.25-40 mg/kg) was combined with either PHT or CBZ and tested in electroconvulsive tests. DCS, at doses of 2.5 and 10 mg/kg, was the most effective in potentiating the threshold-increasing action of PHT; higher doses of DCS (20 and 40 mg/kg) were required to achieve a similar effect of CBZ. In maximal electroshock-induced seizures, DCS (10 mg/kg) augmented the protective action of PHT, but was ineffective at a dose of 40 mg/kg with CBZ. DCS did not potentiate the neurotoxicity produced by PHT and CBZ in the chimney test. Both PHT and CBZ induced impairments of long-term memory; PHT-induced memory adverse effects were counteracted by DCS (10 mg/kg). There was no such effect on CBZ-induced memory impairment, and a worsening influence was observed. Any pharmacokinetic interactions were excluded by measuring total and free plasma levels of both antiepileptic drugs. Our results suggest that combining DCS with PHT and CBZ may be beneficial in treating epileptic seizures.

Competitive NMDA‐Receptor Antagonists, LY 235959 and LY 233053, Enhance the Protective Efficacy of Various Antiepileptic Drugs Against Maximal Electroshock‐Induced Seizures in Mice

The objective of this study was to evaluate an interaction of two competitive N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA)-receptor antagonists, LY 235959 l(-)-3R,4aS,6R,8aR-6-(phosphonomethyl)-decahydroiso-qu inoline-3-carboxylic acid; < or = 0.5 mg/kg] or LY 233053 cis-(+/-)-4-[(2H-tetrazol-5-yl) methyl]piperidine-2-carboxylic acid; < or = 5 mg/kg] with carbamazepine, diphenylhydantoin, phenobarbital, or valproate magnesium against maximal electroshock-induced convulsions in mice. Electroconvulsions were produced by means of an alternating current (ear-clip electrodes, 0.2-s stimulus duration, tonic hindlimb extension taken as the end point) delivered by a Hugo-Sachs stimulator (Type 221, reiburg, FRG). Adverse effects were evaluated in the chimney test (motor performance) and passive-avoidance ask (long-term memory). Plasma levels of antiepileptic rugs were measured by immunofluorescence. Both LY 235959 and LY 233053 ( < or = 0.5 and 5 mg/kg, respectively) did not influence the electroconvulsive threshold but potentiated the anticonvulsant action of all antiepileptics studied. The combined treatment of LY 233053 (5 mg/kg) with carbamazepine, diphenylhydantoin, or phenobarbital (providing a 50% protection against maximal electroshock) resulted in the impairment of long-term memory. No adverse effects were observed with combinations of LY 235959 with these antiepileptics. The combined treatment of valproate with either LY 235959 or LY 233053 was superior to valproate alone, as regards motor impairment, but not the impairment of long-term memory. Neither NMDA-receptor antagonist elevated the total plasma levels of antiepileptic drugs studied. It may be concluded that NMDA-receptor blockade leads to the enhanced anticonvulsive action of conventional antiepileptics against maximal electroshock-induced seizures. A pharmacokinetic interaction does not seem probable.

Influence of nicardipine, nimodipine and flunarizine on the anticonvulsant efficacy of antiepileptics against pentylenetetrazol in mice.

Among three calcium channel inhibitors, only nicardipine (10-40 mg/kg) significantly inhibited clonic seizures induced by pentylenetetrazol administered at its CD97 (convulsive dose 97%) of 81 mg/kg, subcutaneously. Nimodipine and flunarizine (both up to 80 mg/kg) did not suppress pentylenetetrazol-induced clonic seizures per se. Co-administration of nicardipine (5 mg/kg) resulted in a significant enhancement of the protective potency of either ethosuximide (50 mg/kg) or valproate (100 mg/kg) against clonic seizures in this test. Similar effects were noted in case of combined treatment of nimodipine (20-40 mg/kg) with these antiepileptics. On the contrary, flunarizine (up to 20 mg/kg) did not modify the anticonvulsive action of these antiepileptic drugs. Moreover, none of the studied calcium channel inhibitors influenced the protective activity of clonazepam (0.01 mg/kg). The antiepileptic drugs, administered alone in above doses, were ineffective against pentylenetetrazol-induced clonic convulsions. In case of ethosuximide and valproate, the motor performance in the chimney test was worsened by co-administration of nimodipine (40 mg/kg). We found no pharmacokinetic interactions (at least in relation to the plasma levels of ethosuximide and valproate) that could explain the observed results. Thus, we conclude that a combination of some calcium channel inhibitors and antiepileptic drugs may provide more efficient protection against experimental seizures which may bear a potential clinical significance.

Interactions of excitatory amino acid antagonists with conventional antiepileptic drugs

Excitatory amino acid antagonists possess anticonvulsant properties in many experimental models of epilepsy and were shown to potentiate the protective activity of conventional antiepileptics against maximal electroshock-induced seizures in mice. Combined treatments of valproate with either D,L-(E)-2-amino-4-methyl-5-phosphono-3-pentenoic acid or dizocilpine (NMDA antagonists), which provided a 50% protection against maximal electroshock, produced no side-effects, as measured in the chimney test (motor coordination) or passive avoidance task (long-term memory). Valproate alone at its ED50 against maximal electroshock, induced severe adverse effects. The NMDA antagonists, D-3-(2-carboxypiperazine-4-yl)-1-propenyl-1-phosphonic acid, memantine, procyclidine, and trihexyphenidyl also potentiated the protective activity of conventional antiepileptics but these treatments were associated with considerable side-effects. The non-NMDA receptor antagonists, 2,3-dihydroxy-6-nitro-7-sulfamoylbenzo(F)quinoxaline and 1-(amino-phenyl)-4-methyl-7,8-methylenedioxy-5H-2,3-benzodiazepine, also enhanced the anticonvulsive action of antiepileptic drugs against maximal electroshock, and these combinations generally resulted in no adverse effects. The potential clinical importance of some combinations of common antiepileptics with excitatory amino acid antagonists is postulated.

Changes in etilefrine-induced CNS effects when associated with theophylline

A diverse set of techniques (curiosity, chimney test, changes in barbiturate-induced sleep time, spontaneous motor activity, swimming ability, body temperature) was used to study theophylline (T)-induced changes in CNS etilefrine (E). T antagonized the depressive effects produced by high doses of E. Nevertheless, the LD50 of E was not modified when both drugs were administered simultaneously.

The competitive NMDA antagonist, D-CPP-ene, potentiates the anticonvulsant activity of conventional antiepileptics against maximal electroshock-induced seizures in mice

D-CPP-ene [3-(2-carboxypiperazine-4-yl)-1-propenyl-1-phosphonic acid; a competitive antagonist of N- methyl- D- aspartic acid] in a dose of 2 mg kg (i.p.) significantly increased the threshold for electroconvulsions. When given in a dose half that affecting the electroconvulsive threshold, D-CPP-ene potentiated the anticonvulsant activity of carbamazepine, diazepam, diphenylhydantoin, phenobarbital and valproate against maximal electroshock (50 mA)-induced seizures in mice. However, this NMDA antagonist did not influence the plasma levels of the antiepileptic drugs studied, so a pharmacokinetic interaction, in terms of total plasma levels at least, is not probable. The chimney test and retention testing in mice revealed that the combined treatment of D-CPP-ene at 1.0 mg kg (i.p.) with either diazepam, diphenylhydantoin, phenobarbital or valproate (providing a 50% protection against maximal electroshock convulsions) resulted in motor impairment and caused impairment of long-term memory. On the other hand, a combination of D-CPP-ene and carbamazepine was devoid of adverse effects. It can be concluded that the potential utility of D-CPP-ene in combination with conventional antiepileptic drugs does not seem promising, except for carbamazepine.

The NMDA antagonist procyclidine, but not ifenprodil, enhances the protective efficacy of common antiepileptics against maximal electroshock-induced seizures in mice.

Procyclidine (up to 20 mg/kg i.p.) did not influence the electroconvulsive threshold per se, but when given in a dose of 10 mg/kg, it potentiated the protective activity of carbamazepine, diphenylhydantoin, phenobarbital and valproate, and in a dose of 20 mg/kg, that of diazepam against maximal electroshock-induced convulsions in mice. Ifenprodil increased the threshold for electroconvulsions when applied at 20 and 40 mg/kg (i.p.), but surprisingly, when combined with all antiepileptics tested, it did not influence their anticonvulsant actions. The chimney test in mice revealed, that application of procyclidine at 10 mg/kg together with phenobarbital and valproate, and procyclidine at 20 mg/kg with diazepam resulted in motor impairment. However, when procyclidine was applied at 10 mg/kg together with carbamazepine or diphenylhydantoin, no motor impairment was noted. The combined treatment of procyclidine (10 mg/kg) with carbamazepine, diphenylhydantoin, phenobarbital or valproate, as well as procyclidine (20 mg/kg) with diazepam caused significant worsening of long-term memory. Finally, procyclidine did not alter the total plasma levels of carbamazepine, diazepam, diphenylhydantoin, phenobarbital and valproate. It may be concluded that not all agents interfering with NMDA receptor complex-mediated events lead to the potentiation of the anticonvulsant activity of antiepileptic drugs.

Competitive NMDA receptor antagonists enhance the antielectroshock activity of various antiepileptics

CGP 37849 (1 mg/kg i.p.) enhanced the protective action of carbamazepine, diphenylhydantoin and phenobarbital against maximal electroshock-induced convulsions in mice. At 0.25 mg/kg CGP 37849 was inactive and at 0.5 mg/kg it potentiated the anticonvulsive activity of phenobarbital. CGP 39551 (5 mg/kg i.p.) reduced the ED 50 values of diphenylhydantoin and phenobarbital, being without influence on carbamazepine. In the dose of 1.25 mg/kg, CGP 39551 potentiated the antielectroshock action of diphenylhydantoin and at 2.5 mg/kg that of phenobarbital. Neither NMDA receptor antagonist elevated the total plasma levels of antiepileptic drugs. Consequently, a pharmacokinetic interaction (in terms of total plasma levels at least) seems unlikely to be responsible for the observed potentiation of the antiepileptic drug's activity. Combinations of CGP 37849 with either carbamazepine or phenobarbital resulted in a motor and memory impairment quantified by the chimney test and passive avoidance task, respectively. Moreover, combined treatment with phenobarbital and CGP 39551 caused a memory deficit. In contrast, diphenylhydantoin combined with either CGP 37849 or 39551 was devoid of adverse effects. It may be concluded that NMDA receptor blockade results in enhanced anticonvulsive action of common antiepileptics against maximal electroshock-induced seizures.

2,3-dihydroxy-6-nitro-7-sulfamoylbenzo(F)quinoxaline enhances the protective activity of common antiepileptic drugs against maximal electroshock-induced seizures in mice

NBQX (2,3-dihydroxy-6-nitro-7-sulfamoylbenzo(F)quinoxaline), a novel and selective AMPA antagonist, was tested to evaluate its influence upon anticonvulsant activity of common antiepileptic drugs in mice. NBQX (10, 20, 40 mg/kg, i.p.) had no influence upon the threshold for electroconvulsions. NBQX (10 mg/kg) enhanced the activity of anticonvulsant drugs decreasing their ED 50s against maximal electroshock from 321 to 190 mg/kg for valproate, from 19.5 to 14.5 mg/kg for carbamazepine, from 31.0 to 21.4 mg/kg phenobarbital, from 17.8 to 9.5 mg/kg for diphenylhydantoin and from 19.5 to 10.5 mg/kg for diazepam. In addition, NBQX (10 mg/kg) failed to impair motor performance and long-term memory determined in the chimney test and passive avoidance task. The combinations of NBQX (10 mg/kg) and carbamazepine, diphenylhydantoin or phenobarbital resulted in no adverse effects. Diazepam (10.5 mg/kg) alone impaired the motor performance and long-term memory and so it did when combined with NBQX. Also retention of the passive avoidance task and motor performance were impaired by valproate alone or given together with NBQX. Finally, NBQX (10 mg/kg) did not affect the plasma level of any antiepileptic drug. It is concluded that non-NMDA glutamate receptor blockade results in the considerable enhancement of the efficacy of common antiepileptic drugs.

Profile of ucb L059, a novel anticonvulsant drug, in models of partial and generalized epilepsy in mice and rats

The novel anticonvulsant drug ucb L059 ((S)-α-ethyl-2-oxo-1-pyrrolidineacetamide) was evaluated in several rodent models of partial and generalized seizures. Ucb L059 (27–108 mg/kg i.p.) increased the thresholds for tonic electroconvulsions and myoclonic and clonic seizures induced by timed i.v. infusion of pentylenetetrazol (PTZ), but was ineffective in the traditional maximal electroshock seizure and s.c. PTZ seizure tests in mice and rats in doses up to 500 mg/kg. The anticonvulsant potency of ucb L059 in seizure threshold tests was similar to that of standard drugs, such as valproate. In amygdala-kindled rats, ucb L059 exerted potent anticonvulsant activity against both focal and secondarily generalized seizures at doses of 13–108 mg/kg. The adverse effects of ucb L059 were quantitated in the open field and in standard tests for motor impairment, such as the rotarod and chimney tests. Ucb L059 exerted only minimal effects on behaviour, e.g. slight hyperactivity, and did not impair muscle activity in the rotarod test in doses up to 1700 mg/kg i.p. The data indicate that the ucb L059 is an interesting new anticonvulsant agent with a broad spectrum of activity and high therapeutic index.

Competitive antagonist of NMDA receptors, CGP 37849 and CGP 39551, enhance the anticonvulsant activity of valproate against electroconvulsions in mice

Two novel N-methyl-D-aspartic acid (NMDA) competitive antagonist, CGP 37849 (1.25 and 2.5 mg/kg) and CGP 39551 (10 mg/kg), significantly raised the threshold for electroconvulsions in mice. CGP 37849 in doses of 0.125–1.0 mg/kg and CGP 39551 in dose of 0.625–5 mg/kg i.p. considerably potentiated the protective activity of magnesium valproate againts maximal electroshock-induced convulsions. The anticonvulsant activity of sodium valroate was potentiated by CGP 37849 (1 mg/kg) to a similar degree, which suggest that magnesium is not involved in the observed interaction. Neither CGP agent influenced the plasma level of valproate, so a pharmacokinetic interactions, in terms of total plasma levels is not probable. Furthermore the performance of mice injected with magnesium valproate (90 mg/kg) and CGP 37849 (0.25 mg/kg), which provided 50% protection againts maximal electroshock-induced convulsions, in the long-term memory test and chimney test did not differ significantly from that of the control animals. The combination of magnesium valproate and CGP 39551 had a neurotoxic potential comparable to that of valproate alone. The result suggest that a combined treatment of valproate and some competitive NMDA antagonists may be important from a clinical point of view.

Influence of flunarizine, nicardipine and nimodipine on the anticonvulsant activity of different antiepileptic drugs in mice.

Only flunarizine (40 mg/kg, i.p.) significantly raised the threshold for electroconvulsions in mice (ear-clip electrodes, 0.2 sec stimulus duration, tonic hindlimb extension as an endpoint), whilst nicardipine and nimodipine (up to 80 mg/kg) was ineffective in this respect. Further, flunarizine (10 and 20 mg/kg) potentiated the efficacy of carbamazepine and valproate against maximum electroshock (50 mA)-induced seizures and, in the dose of 20 mg/kg, enhanced that of diphenylhydantoin. In addition, this calcium channel inhibitor was without influence upon the total levels of these antiepileptics in plasma. Nicardipine (5 and 10 mg/kg) and nimodipine (10 and 20 mg/kg) increased the protective potential of carbamazepine and nimodipine (20 mg/kg) also decreased the ED50 of diphenylhydantoin against maximum electroshock. However, nicardipine distinctly increased the level of carbamazepine in plasma, whilst nimodipine did not affect the level of both antiepileptics in plasma. The combined treatment of calcium channel inhibitors and antiepileptic drugs, providing a 50% protection against maximum electroshock, did not significantly change the motor performance of mice in the chimney test, when compared with antiepileptic drugs, given alone at their ED50s, against maximum electroshock-induced convulsions. The present results give further support to the idea of the combined use of some calcium channel inhibitors and antiepileptic drugs in the treatment of human epilepsy.

Antiparkinsonian drugs memantine and trihexyphenidyl potentiate the anticonvulsant activity of valproate against maximal electroshock-induced seizures

Memantine increased the threshold for electroconvulsions, when administered at 1.0–6.0 mg/kg (i.p.) and given in subthreshold dosesof 0.0156, 0.0625, 0.125 and 0.5 mg/kg (i.p.) potentiated the protective efficacy of valproate, against maximal electroshock (50 mA)-induced seizures in mice, lowering the ED 50 from 235 to 197, 172, 164 and 130 mg/kg, respectively. Trihexyphenidyl, applied in doses of 30 and 50 mg/kg (i.p.), did not influence the electroconvulsive threshold per se but when combined with valproate, strongly enhanced its anticonvulsant activity against maximal electroshock-induced seizures lowering the ED 50 from 206 to 103 and 46 mg/kg, respectively. The chimney test and retention testing in mice revealed that administration of memantine at 0.5 mg/kg (i.p.) or trihexyphenidyl at 30 mg/kg (i.p.) together with valproate in doses of 130 or 103 mg/kg (i.p.), respectively, resulted in motor impairmeny and caused impairment of long-term memory, similar to the effects of valproate alone, when applied at its ED 50 against maximal electroshock. Neither memantine nor trihexyphenidyl altered the total level of valproate in plasma. It may be concluded that the potentiation of the anticonvulsant activity of valproate, by memantine and trihexyphenidyl, is not associated with a pharmacokinetic interaction.