Chimney Grafts Research Articles

In vitro quantification of stent-graft behaviour during chimney thoracic endovascular aortic repair.

To quantify dynamic gutter phenomena and endograft deformations during double chimney thoracic endovascular aortic repair (ch-TEVAR) in a physiological model of the thoracic aorta subjected to pulsatile haemodynamic conditions. Two in vitro procedures revascularizing the brachiocephalic trunk and left common carotid artery were performed representing both balloon-expandable (BE, Ankura-BeGraft) and self-expandable (SE, Ankura-Viabahn) double ch-TEVAR configurations. Retrospectively gated computed tomography (CT) was used to evaluate endograft behaviour. Device interactions were characterised according to gutter volume, gutter surface deviation, and endograft deformation (D-ratio) at end-diastolic and peak-systolic aortic pressure. Use of BE chimney grafts resulted in three times total gutter volume compared to SE chimney grafts. Gutter volumes were observed to vary dynamically between the end-diastolic and peak-systolic phases of the cardiac cycle, with the most substantial change associated with the BE configuration. Chimney graft deformations were dependent on device type, with SE devices exhibiting up to twice the deformation as BE devices. When adjacent, SE chimney grafts were observed to support each other, and thus tended towards a more consistently circular shape. Gutter and chimney graft behaviour were dependent on device type, and exhibited both spatial and temporal variability. This study emphasises notable differences between BE and SE double ch-TEVAR configurations which should be considered when evaluating risk of endoleak. The findings reported here also support the use of gated CT to better identify device-related complications with ch-TEVAR, and can be used in the design of next generation devices.

Successful chimney endovascular aortic repair with reconstruction of three visceral branches for huge saccular juxtarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm after trans-thoracoabdominal esophagectomy

BackgroundConventional graft replacement for a juxtarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm (JRAAA) remains challenging for high-risk patients since it often requires the reconstruction of some visceral arteries.Case PresentationA 76-year-old woman was diagnosed with an 87 × 48 mm saccular JRAAA. Open graft replacement was contraindicated because of frailty and a past history of trans-thoracoabdominal esophagectomy. Chimney endovascular aortic repair (ChEVAR) with three chimney endografts was successfully performed without any endoleaks, and each visceral circulation was kept intact. The patient was discharged uneventfully on postoperative day 8. Significant shrinkage of the aneurysmal sac and preservation of flow through each chimney graft were observed on computed tomography 6 months postoperatively, with no significant increase in serum creatinine levels on laboratory testing.ConclusionsChEVAR can be a useful surgical option instead of conventional operations, especially for high-risk cases.

Early multicentric outcomes of the on-label and CE-marked combination of the Endurant with the Radiant chimney graft for the chimney endovascular aortic repair (EnChEVAR): The LaMuR Registry.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the early results of the CE-marked standardized device combination consisting of Endurant and the Radiant chimney graft (En-ChEVAR) for the treatment of juxtarenal aortic aneurysms. We analyzed multicentric non-industry sponsored case series evaluating the EnChEVAR technique for patients treated between December 2022 and February 2024. Clinical, perioperative procedure-related and radiological data were collected. The primary outcome measure was the freedom of a type Ia gutter-related endoleak at postoperative computed tomography angiography (CTA). Secondary outcome measures included early type Ia endoleak-related reinterventions, target vessel complications including dissection or loss of target vessel, major adverse events, and mortality. Continuous variables were presented as median (interquartile range [IQR]) and categorical variables as count and percentage. Ten patients were included in the present study. Eight (80%) were males, in nine cases a single chimney was implanted, and the other one was a double chimney graft placement. The treated aneurysms had an infrarenal neck length of 3.4 (1.2) mm. The rate of main body oversizing was 30%. The new neck length after chimney graft placement was 18 (3) mm. The median procedural time was 130 (17) mm, contrast medium use was 109 (26) mL, radiation time was 45 (12) min. The technical success was 100%. No type Ia endoleak was detected at the postoperative CTA. There were no target vessel issues. No major adverse events or death were observed. First reported cohort of patients treated with EnChEVAR demonstrated reproducible clinical and procedural outcomes within the 3 vascular centers with total exclusion of the aneurysms, patent renal arteries, and no evidence of gutter-related type IA endoleak. Further evidence with larger sample size of treated patients and longer follow-up are needed.

Protagoras 3.0: feasibility of current fenestrated endografts and chimney technique for complex abdominal aortic aneurysms.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the anatomical feasibility of current available fenestrated endografts (FEVAR) and on-label chimney technique (EnChEVAR) in patients with complex abdominal aortic aneurysms (C-AAA). Feasibility of EnChEVAR (Endurant II/IIS CE-marked [Medtronic]) and 4 types of FEVAR (Zenith Fenestrated CE-marked, Zenith Fenestrated Low-Profile [LP] custom-made device [CMD] [Cook Medical], Fenestrated Anaconda LoPro90 CMD, Fenestrated Treo CMD [Terumo Aortic]) was assessed according to the manufacturer's instructions for use. Computed tomography angiograms of patients with C-AAA previously included in the Protagoras 2.0 study were retrospectively reviewed. The aortic coverage was ideally planned to involve a maximum of two chimney grafts or fenestrations. Iliac access and aortic neck of 73 C-AAAs were analyzed. The overall feasibility was significantly different between EnChEVAR (33%) and FEVAR (Zenith Fenestrated 15%, Zenith Fenestrated LP 15%, Fenestrated Anaconda LoPro90 45%, Fenestrated Treo 48%). The iliac access feasibility was significantly lower for Zenith Fenestrated with standard profile compared to all other grafts. The aortic neck feasibility was significantly higher for EnChEVAR and both Terumo Aortic fenestrated stent grafts, compared to both Cook Medical grafts. The treatment using any of the three current available fenestrated grafts with lower profile (Zenith Fenestrated LP, Fenestrated Anaconda LoPro90, Fenestrated Treo) would have been feasible in 71% of the cases. Most of the patients treated by ChEVAR would have not been treated by first generation fenestrated stent graft. The current available fenestrated endografts, with lower profile and suitable also for angulated necks, increase the anatomical feasibility.

Pararenal Aortic Thrombus in Patients Undergoing Aortic Aneurysm Repair With Chimney Technique.

Chimney technique (chimney graft in abdominal aortic aneurysm repair [ChEVAR]) can be used to treat patients with pararenal aortic aneurysm unfit for open surgery and not suitable for custom-made fenestrated endograft. Since almost 1 in 5 patients undergo a reintervention within 3 years, features associated with higher risk of complications need to be investigated to tailor the follow-up schedule to each patient. The aim of our study was to assess the impact of mural thrombus in the pararenal aorta on perioperative and follow-up complications after ChEVAR. All consecutive patients undergoing ChEVAR at our center from 2015 to 2022 were included in this retrospective study. Collected variables included number of target vessels, stent graft size, presence, and severity of mural thrombus in pararenal aorta, which was reported with a scoring system from 0 to 10 based on thrombus type, thickness area, and circumferenceAnalyzed outcomes included perioperative and follow-up complications. Thirty-one patients underwent ChEVAR during the study period. In 4 patients the indication for ChEVAR was type 1A endoleak after a previous endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR). The number of target vessels was 1 in 17 patients (55%), 2 in 12 (39%), 3 in 1 (3%), and 4 in 1 (%). The mean mural thrombus score was 5.9. Complications were the following: type 1A endoleak in 4 cases (13%), chimney stent complications in 7 cases (23%) (including partial or total thrombosis, intrastent stenosis, displacement), renal function worsening during follow-up in 8 cases (26%). Overall survival was 90% at 2 years. Patients with severe mural thrombus showed lower freedom from ChEVAR-related complications (28% vs 59% at 2 years, p=0.023). The presence of severe pararenal aortic mural thrombus was associated with lower freedom from ChEVAR-related complications in patients undergoing ChEVAR for pararenal aortic aneurysm repair. Further research with a larger number of patients is required to confirm these results. The analysis of severity of mural thrombus in pararenal aorta, which was reported with a scoring system from 0 to 10 based on thrombus type, thickness area and circumference, can be useful and can be represent an important predictor element for complications in patient submitted to Chimney tecnique; in fact the presence of severe pararenal aortic mural thrombus was associated with lower freedom from ChEVAR-related complications in patients undergoing ChEVAR for pararenal aortic aneurysm repair. Then, in patient with pararenal aortic aneurysm, a preoperative evaluation could be focused on severity of mural thrombus to minimize the complications in ChEVAR tecnique or to change the surgical strategy.

Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Fenestrated and Chimney/Snorkel Techniques for Endovascular Repair of Juxtarenal Aortic Aneurysms.

Comparative effectiveness of fenestrated endovascular aneurysm repair (FEVAR) and chimney graft endovascular aneurysm repair (ChEVAR) for juxtarenal aortic aneurysms (JAAs) remains unclear. Our objective was to identify and analyze the current body of evidence comparing the effectiveness of both techniques for JAA. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing the effectiveness of FEVAR and ChEVAR for JAA repair. We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane Register for Controlled Trials from January 1, 1990, for randomized and non-randomized studies assessing outcomes of FEVAR and ChEVAR for JAA repair. Screening, data extraction, risk of bias assessment, and GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessments, Development, and Evaluations) certainty of evidence were performed in duplicate. Data were pooled statistically where possible. Nine retrospective cohort studies comparing the use of FEVAR and ChEVAR for juxtarenal aneurysm were included for meta-analysis. The FEVAR and ChEVAR arms of the meta-analysis consisted of 726 participants and 518 participants, respectively. There were 598 (86.8%) and 332 (81.6%) men in each arm. The mean diameter was larger in the ChEVAR arm (59 mm vs 52.5 mm). Both techniques had similar rates of postoperative 30-day mortality, 3.38% (8/237) versus 3.52% (8/227), acute kidney injury, 16.76% (31/185) versus 17.31% (18/104), and major adverse cardiac events, 7.30% (46/630) versus 6.60% (22/333). The meta-analysis supported the use of FEVAR for most outcomes, with significant advantage for technical success (odds ratio [OR]: 3.24, 95% CI: 1.24-8.42) and avoidance of type 1 endoleak (OR: 5.76, 95% CI: 1.94-17.08), but a disadvantage for spinal cord ischemia (OR: 10.21, 95% CI: 1.21-86.11), which had a very low number of events. The quality of evidence was "moderate" for most outcomes. Both endovascular techniques had good safety profiles. The evidence does not support superiority of either FEVAR or ChEVAR for JAA. While lack of equipoise has hampered the design of randomised trials of open versus endovascular repair of juxtarenal aortic aneurysms, concern about the durability of endovascular repair highlights the need for stronger evidence of the comparative efficacy of endovascular techniques. This review performed meta-analysis and evidence appraisal of recent data from large observational studies comparing fenestrated and chimney techniques, using a comprehensive outcome set. Superiority of either intervention could not be established due to differences in participants' baseline risk in each study arm. However, data suggests that both techniques are safe and suitable for use when indicated.

A Novel Approach for Simultaneous Venoarterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation and Left Ventricular Decompression Therapy With Impella (ECPella)

Percutaneously placed veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO) is commonly used to support patients with refractory cardiac arrhythmias or arrest and worsening cardiogenic shock (CS). Peripheral VA-ECMO by retrograde flow of blood in the aorta results in a significant increase in left ventricle (LV) afterload. A severely dysfunctional LV may be unable to overcome this afterload to open the aortic valve and unload itself. This may lead to LV distension, increased left ventricular pressure, poor coronary blood circulation, increased left atrial pressures, pulmonary edema, and pulmonary hypertension. Moreover, it jeopardizes ventricular recovery, particularly in the presence of ischemia-induced myocardial impairment. Furthermore, if the aortic valve remains closed during the cardiac cycle, stasis of blood in the LV and aortic root may increase the risk of thrombus formation. These complications may preclude cardiac recovery and the patient from being a heart transplant candidate. In patients with CS, utilizing Impella with VA-ECMO, commonly referred to as ECPella, has consistently been shown to reduce mortality and improve outcomes. Patients who need prolonged ECPella support as a bridge to recovery or transplant may remain bed-bound since ambulation of patients with two mechanical circulatory support devices is challenging. We present the technique of ECPella placement through Y chimney graft anastomosis on the axillary artery for arterial cannula and Impella insertion and percutaneous cannulation of the right internal Jugular vein for venous cannula. This technique gives the ease of ambulation and decannulation of VA-ECMO under local anesthesia without requiring intubation or a trip to the operating room.

The evidence of chimney grafts in treating aortic arch diseases

Abstract: Steep aortic arch (such as Type III arch) and small angle between the chimney artery and aortic arch are two anatomic conditions suitable for chimney grafts (CGs). The more the number of chimneys, the higher the incidence of endoleak and branch occlusion; thus, the triple-chimney technique should be avoided unless the lesion involves zone 0 and no other better option is available, or a pending rupture is present and requires emergent repair. For the oversize of multiple chimneys, we suggest that the aortic stent and chimney stent should be increased by 5%, respectively, on the basis of single chimney. Moreover, the direction of the chimney stent is decided by the relative position of the proximal tear in patients with dissection. When the tear is located in the anterior segment, the chimney graft should be deployed behind the aortic stent graft, close to the posterior wall of the thoracic aorta, and in front of the aortic stent grafts when the tear is located in the posterior segment. In conclusion, if the endoleak is small and the patient’s condition is stable with no obvious discomfort, for most of the patients, the endoleak will disappear spontaneously in the follow-up. If the endoleak is large, microcoil could be implanted through the narrow and long gap to block the endoleak under the guidance of ultrasound. CGs technique needs to be scrutinized continuously as new data emerge. Special configurations of aortic and chimney endograft need to be developed to better treat aortic pathologies involving supra-arch branches.

Results of the Chimney Technique in a Community Hospital.

The chimney technique, fenestrated or branched endovascular aortic repair are endovascular options in patients with a juxtarenal, suprarenal or type IV thoraco-abdominal aneurysm. The chimney technique has specific advantages and disadvantages. A retrospective single center study was performed to describe the results. All consecutive patients in whom the chimney technique was used between 1th January 2011 and 31th December 2020 were included. We excluded patients who needed a revision of an existing EVAR and patients with a para-anastomotic aneurysm. Outcomes were reported in accordance with the reporting standards. 38 Patients were included in the study, a total of 59 chimney grafts were deployed. At a median follow-up duration of 26.6 months, there were 9 patients with occlusion of the chimney graft. In 1 patient an iliac renal bypass was performed. In the other patients the renal function stabilized and no further therapy was necessary. All chimneys in the mesenteric arteries remained patent. Gutter endoleak was seen in 5 patients, 3 patients were successfully treated and in the other 2 patients the gutter endoleak disappeared spontaneously. Conclusions should be drawn carefully as this is a retrospective non-comparative study. Results from 38 patients treated with the chimney technique are presented. Chimney graft occlusion rate was 15.3% at the end of follow-up. However, the majority (77.8%) of the occluded stents were self-expandable stents, stressing the importance of selecting the right devices.

O064 Management of acute aortic syndrome with evolving individualized precision medicine solutions: lesson learned over two decades and literature review

Abstract Introduction Thoracoabdominal acute aortic syndrome is associated with high morbidity and mortality. We aim to scrutinize our evolving strategies for acute aortic syndromes (AAS) management using minimally invasive and adaptive surgical techniques. Methods This is a longitudinal observational study at our tertiary vascular centre from 2002 to 2021. Amongst 96 with symptomatic aortic thoracic pathologies, 71 had AAS. Our primary endpoint was combined aneurysm and cardiovascular-related mortality. Results There were 43 males and 28 females (5 Traumatic Aortic Transection (TAT), 8 Intramural Hematoma (IMH), 27 Symptomatic Aortic Dissection (SAD) and 31 Thoracic Aortic Aneurysm (TAA)) with a mean age of 69. All AAH received optimal medical therapy (OMT) and TAT underwent emergency thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR). Fifty-eight patients had aortic dissection, of which 31 developed TAA. These 58 received OMT initially and interval surgical intervention with TEVAR or sTaged hybrId sinGle lumEn Reconstruction (TIGER). To increase our landing area, we performed left subclavian chimney graft with TEVAR in 12 patients. Average follow-up was 78.2 months, and 11 patients (15.5%) had combined aneurysm and cardiovascular-related mortality. None had stroke or bowel ischaemia. 26% developed endoleaks, and 15% required re-intervention (type II & III). Four patients had paraplegia (5.7%) and succumbed to death from renal failure. Eight IMH patients on OMT died within 30 days. Conclusion Acute aortic hematoma necessitates close monitoring and early intervention. TIGER technique with interval TEVAR has salvaged complex situations in young patients. Our experience shows that minimally invasive techniques could be a viable option for AAS.

Subclavian artery revascularization with subclavian-carotid transposition for TEVAR and non-TEVAR patients.

Subclavian artery revascularization (SAR) has become an increasingly performed technique in patients undergoing thoracic endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (TEVAR), in order to optimize the proximal landing zone, or in patients with significant atherosclerotic diseases. SAR was usually achieved through carotid-subclavian bypass (CSB) which is daunted by graft and patency-related issues, or through subclavian carotid transposition (SCT) which has recently been reconsidered as a potential solution. Nowadays, multiple endovascular strategies including parallel grafts, chimney graft and branch-fenestrated repair, are available in patients unfit for open SAR. However, there is no consensus on the preferable technique in both TEVAR- and non TEVAR-patients. The purpose of this study was to evaluate our experience with SCT in terms of overall postoperative adverse events and mid-term patency rate. We performed a retrospective cohort study, including all patients who underwent SCT between June 2014 and March 2020 at our Division. Preoperative risk factors, symptoms, intraoperative details, postoperative outcomes and follow-up data were collected. A total of 27 patients were included in this study. Indications for SCT included aortic arch debranching for TEVAR for thoracic aortic aneurysm and type B dissection and symptomatic subclavian steal syndrome (SSS). There were no major perioperative adverse events or major neurological complications; five minor adverse events occurred (18.5%) (3 Horner' Syndrome, 1 hematoma requiring reoperation,1 pneumothorax). Peripheral nerve injuries and lymphatic lesions were not recorded. On a mean follow-up of 21±16 months, SCT patency was confirmed in all patients and no deaths occurred. Comparison of baseline and operative characteristics and intraoperative details between groups of patients with or without adverse events did not found differences. SCT should be considered a feasible, effective and safe technique for SAR, with low perioperative complications and optimal mid-term patency. This surgical technique appears to provide a lower risk of neurological events and mortality, particularly in TEVAR patients, reducing the complications caused by the coverage of the left subclavian artery.

Combining Endovascular Aneurysm Sealing with Chimney Grafts – 5 Year Follow-Up after 47 Procedures

To evaluate longer-term results of a cohort treated with primary chimney endovascular aneurysm sealing (ChEVAS) for complex abdominal aortic aneurysms or secondary ChEVAS after failed endovascular aneurysm repair/endovascular aneurysm sealing. A single-center study was conducted of 47 consecutive patients (mean age 72±8years, range 50-91; 38 men) treated with ChEVAS from February 2014 to November 2016 and followed through December 2021. The main outcome measures were all-cause mortality (ACM), aneurysm-related mortality, occurrence of secondary complications and conversion to open surgery. Data are presented as the median (interquartile range [IQR]) and absolute range. 35 patients received a primary ChEVAS (=group I) and 12 patients a secondary ChEVAS (=group II). Technical success was 97% (group I) and 92% (group II); 30-day mortality was 3% and 8%, respectively. The median proximal sealing zone length was 20.5mm (IQR 16, 24; range 10-48) in group I and 26mm (IQR 17.5, 30; range 8-45) in group II, respectively. During a median time of follow-up of 62months (range 0-88), ACM amounted to 60% (group I) and 58% (group II); aneurysm mortality was 29% and 8%, respectively. An endoleak was seen in 57% (group I: 15 type Ia endoleaks, four isolated type Ib, and 1 endoleak type V) and 25% (group II: 1 endoleak type Ia, one type II, and 2 type V), aneurysm growth in 40% and 17%, migration in 40% and 17%, resulting in 20% and 25% conversions in group I and II, respectively. Overall a secondary intervention was performed in 51% (group I) and 25% (group II), respectively. The occurrence of complications did not significantly differ between the 2 groups. Neither the number of chimney grafts, nor the thrombus ratio significantly affected the occurrence of abovementioned complications. While initially delivering a high technical success rate, ChEVAS fails to provide acceptable longer-term results both in primary and secondary ChEVAS, resulting in high rates of complications, secondary interventions and open conversions.

Efficacy of left subclavian artery revascularization strategies during thoracic endovascular aortic repair in patients with type B dissection: A single-center experience of 105 patients.

Left subclavian artery (LSA) revascularization during thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) is necessary to reduce postoperative complications in patients with Stanford type B aortic dissection and an insufficient proximal anchoring area. However, the efficacy and safety of different LSA revascularization strategies remain unclear. Here, we compared these strategies to provide a clinical basis for selecting an appropriate LSA revascularization method. In this study, we included 105 patients with type B aortic dissection who were treated using TEVAR combined with LSA reconstruction in the Second Hospital of Lanzhou University from March 2013 to 2020. They were divided into four groups according to the method used for LSA reconstruction, namely, carotid subclavian bypass (CSB; n = 41), chimney graft (CG; n = 29), single-branched stent graft (SBSG; n = 21), and physician-made fenestration (PMF; n = 14) groups. Finally, we collected and analyzed the baseline, perioperative, operative, postoperative, and follow-up data of the patients. The treatment success rate was 100% in all the groups, and CSB + TEVAR was the most commonly used procedure in emergency settings compared with the other three procedures (P < 0.05). The estimated blood loss, contrast agent volume, fluoroscopic time, operation time, and limb ischemia symptoms during the follow-up were significantly different in the four groups (P < 0.05). Pairwise comparison among groups indicated that the estimated blood loss and operation time in the CSB group were the highest (adjusted P < 0.0083; P < 0.05). The contrast agent volume and fluoroscopy duration were the highest in the SBSG groups, followed by PMF, CG, and CSB groups. The incidence of limb ischemia symptoms was the highest in the PMF group (28.6%) during the follow-up. The incidence of complications (except limb ischemia symptoms) during the perioperative and follow-up periods was similar among the four groups (P > 0.05) The median follow-up time of CSB, CG, SBSG, and PMF groups was significantly different (P < 0.05), and the CSB group had the longest follow-up. Our single-center experience suggested that the PMF technique increased the risk of limb ischemia symptoms. The other three strategies effectively and safely restored LSA perfusion in patients with type B aortic dissection and had comparable complications. Overall, different LSA revascularization techniques have their advantages and disadvantages.

Chimney technique for left subclavian artery restoration -Two cases presentations-

Introduction: Left subclavian artery revascularization (LSAR) is performed in the setting of thoracic endovascular repair (TEVAR). In recent years, the chimney technique is an effective method of LSAR. Cases: Two case reports analyze our experience in the chimney technique for the LSAR. In the first case, a young male underwent in a TEVAR due to an aortic isthmus rupture. In the second case, a male underwent in elective endovascular repair of thoracic aortic aneurysm and in the second time he underwent in an endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair. In 3 months postoperatively, the second man’s follow-up CTA showed that the stents were well formed and no obvious endoleak was noticed. Conclusion: The LSAR in patients who underwent in TEVAR decreases the risk of stroke and upper limb ischemia. Several minimally invasive procedures have been employed to manage this, one of them is the chimney graft technique.

Management of acute aortic syndrome with evolving individualized precision medicine solutions: Lessons learned over two decades and literature review.

Thoracoabdominal acute aortic syndrome is associated with high morbidity and mortality. We aim to scrutinize our evolving strategies for acute aortic syndrome (AAS) management using minimally invasive and adaptive surgical techniques over two decades. This is a longitudinal observational study at our tertiary vascular centre from 2002 to 2021. Out of 22,349 aortic referrals, we performed 1,555 aortic interventions over twenty years. Amongst 96 presented with symptomatic aortic thoracic pathology, 71 patients had AAS. Our primary endpoint is combined aneurysm-related and cardiovascular-related mortality. There were 43 males and 28 females (5 Traumatic Aortic Transection (TAT), 8 Acute Aortic Intramural Hematoma (IMH), 27 Symptomatic Aortic Dissection (SAD) and 31 Thoracic Aortic Aneurysm (TAA) post-SAD) with a mean age of 69. All the patients with AAS received optimal medical therapy (OMT), but TAT patients underwent emergency thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR). Fifty-eight patients had an aortic dissection, of which 31 developed TAA. These 31 patients with SAD and TAA received OMT initially and interval surgical intervention with TEVAR or sTaged hybrId sinGle lumEn Reconstruction (TIGER). To increase our landing area, we performed a left subclavian chimney graft with TEVAR in twelve patients. The average follow-up duration was 78.2 months, and eleven patients (15.5%) had combined aneurysm and cardiovascular-related mortality. Twenty-six percentage of the patients developed endoleaks (EL), of which 15% required re-intervention for type II and III. Four patients who had paraplegia (5.7%) and developed renal failure died. None of our patients had a stroke or bowel ischaemia. Twenty patients had OMT, eight of these were patients with acute aortic hematoma, and all eight died within 30 days of presentation. Acute aortic hematoma is a sinister finding, which must be closely monitored, and consideration is given to early intervention. Paraplegia and renal failure result in an increased mortality rate. TIGER technique with interval TEVAR has salvaged complex situations in young patients. Left subclavian chimney increases our landing area and abolishes SINE. Our experience shows that minimally invasive techniques could be a viable option for AAS.

Komplex endovascularis rekonstrukciók az aortaíven.

Thoracic endovascular aneurysm repair (TEVAR) of the aortic arch has started to spread in recent years. We present our initial experience with TEVAR involving supra-aortic branches using parallel and branched grafts. Parallel grafts are typically used in emergency cases. In the case of Z0 proximal fixation, we can perform a combined hybrid surgery with Z1 debranching and securing of the innominate artery with chimney graft, which can also be used instead of Z0 debranching when the patient is unfit for sternotomy. In the case of TEVAR with planned Z2 position with inadvertent covering of the left common carotid artery, we can perform chimney conversion to rapidly recover the circulation of the left common carotid artery (LCCA). Instead of prior revascularization of the left subclavian artery, chimney graft can be used to recover the lumen, in the case of left upper limb ischemia after Z2 TEVAR. Exclusion of penetrating aortic ulcers located in the lesser curvature can be facilitated by use of a custom-made graft, where a scallop is placed around the origin of the supra-aortic vessel, thus increasing the length of the proximal neck. For elective interventions, custom-made branching grafts can be allowed to save all three branches with Z0 fixation. Technical success was obtained in all cases. Orv Hetil. 2023; 164(11): 426-431.

Trans-subclavian approach for Impella CP implantation using the chimney graft in a pediatric patient with fulminant myocarditis during extracorporeal support.

Impella is a device effective for the treatment of cardiogenic shock. However, among small children, its application has limitations due to left ventricle size and vasculature and the turning diameter of the aortic arch. Herein, we report an 11-year-old girl with fulminant myocarditis who was successfully managed with Impella CP implantation via the right subclavian artery using a polyethylene terephthalate chimney graft. Compared with insertion via the femoral artery, this method has several advantages. That is, it can address limitations in aortic arch diameter and facilitate equable fixation of the Impella device in small pediatric patients.

Chimney Stenting Versus Surgical Debranching for the Treatment of Aortic Arch Pathologies—A Propensity-Matched Analysis

Endovascular repair of aortic arch lesions requires revascularization of epiaortic vessels in case of coverage. The objective of this study was to compare the outcomes of surgical bypass versus endovascular reconstruction with a chimney graft. A retrospective analysis of a multicenter register between January 2005 and December 2019 was performed. A total of 127 patients were included and divided into 2 groups: thoracic endovascular aortic repair+surgical debranching (n=72) and thoracic endovascular aortic repair+chimney stenting (n=55). The main end points were major neurologic sequelae and type IA endoleak. Propensity score matching was performed to analyse baseline variables related to these outcomes. The mean follow-up was 35.6months for the debranching group and 34.1 for the chimney group (P=0.65). The incidence of stroke was higher in the chimney group although not statistically significant (7.3% vs. 4.1%; P=0.46); for both groups, a wide angle between the ostium of the target vessel and the aorta and landing in Ishimaru Zone 0 was found to be the main predictors for major neurologic sequelae (P=0.002 and P=0.003, respectively). During follow-up, 9 (12.5%) type IA endoleaks occurred in the debranching group and 12 (21.8%) in the chimney group (P=0.14). Aortic diameter larger than 66mm and arch angle >46° had a strong association with proximal endoleak incidence (P=0.001 and P=0.011, respectively) CONCLUSIONS: Surgical debranching showed better results than chimney stenting in terms of major neurologic events incidence and type IA endoleak, although the difference between the groups was not statistically significant. Further research with larger cohorts is needed to establish the indications for these procedures.

Outcomes of thoracic endovascular aortic repair with chimney technique for aortic arch diseases.

ObjectiveThis study aimed to summarize the long-term experience of using the chimney technique in thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) for aortic arch diseases.MethodsFrom November 2007 to June 2021, a total of 345 consecutive patients (mean age 56 ± 11.3 years, range 28–83, 302 men) with aortic arch pathologies underwent TEVAR combined with chimney technique (cTEVAR). Their medical data and follow-up results were retrospectively reviewed and analyzed.ResultsAmong the 345 patients, 278 (80.6%) received single chimneys, 53 (15.4%) received double chimneys, 7 (2%) received triple chimneys, and 7 (2%) underwent cTEVAR accompanied by other techniques (two with extra-anatomical bypass, two with in situ fenestration, and three with physician modified fenestration). A total of 412 chimney stents were used, including 27 in the innominate artery (IA), 113 in the left common carotid artery, 270 in the left subclavian artery, and two in the aberrant right subclavian artery. Early type IA endoleaks were found in 38 (11%) patients, including 12 with the double or triple chimney technique. Early type II endoleak was found in nine (2.6%) patients. Early re-intervention occurred in two patients with double chimney technique, one for chimney stent migration and the other for compression of chimney stent. The 30-day mortality was 1.2% (4 in 345). During a mean follow-up of 42 ± 22 months (range 1–108 months), major stroke occurred in nine (2.6%) patients, chimney occlusion or stenosis occurred in six (1.7%), and retrograde type A aortic dissection occurred in four (1.2%). Fourteen (4.1%) patients received the secondary intervention. The all-cause mortality was 6.7% (23 in 345). Additionally, the total adverse event rate after cTEVAR was 13.9% (48 in 345).ConclusionTEVAR with chimney technique provides a minimally invasive alternative with good chimney graft patency and low postoperative mortality during follow-up. However, the double and triple chimney techniques should be used cautiously as they seem to have a higher risk for type IA endoleak and adverse events after the operation.

O060 Staged hybrid single lumen reconstruction (TIGER) in management of chronic symptomatic complex type B aortic dissection

Abstract Introduction We aim to report an innovative technique - Staged Hybrid Single Lumen Reconstruction (TIGER) in the management of chronic symptomatic complex type B aortic Dissection (CS -TBAD). TIGER technique was adopted as a tool for total aortic remodelling with true lumen expansion, false lumen regression and complete thrombosis with stabilization of overall aortic diameter. Methods Aortic dissection cases (n = 5) were managed by the TIGER technique, which included creating a single lumen from the supra celiac, infra-diaphragmatic aorta to both common iliac arteries with open surgical patching of the visceral arteries; followed by TEVAR three months later (mean follow-up 16 months). All had aneurysmal dilation, while 60% had acute pan aortic dissection and 40% CS-TBAD. Results Sixty percentages of the patients required a left subclavian artery chimney graft, while 20% required bilateral subclavian to carotid artery transposition. No spinal drainage was needed and all patients had intra-operative trans-oesophageal ECHO for wire guidance. There was no aortic rupture or retrograde type A dissection, and renal, visceral, cardiac, pulmonary, or spinal complications. All, but one patient, went off their antihypertensive medication. 100% of the patients maintained normal eGFR postoperatively with accelerated aortic modulation. Conclusion Our experience showed that TIGER is effective at the semi acute stage to initiate remodelling and prevent malperfusion, facilitating straightforward TEVAR at stage two, which was made easier by avoiding visceral branch stenting. Moreover, the stented aortic segment's length was decreased, avoiding critical shattering, branch dislodgment, and visceral compromise, including spinal ischaemia and negative cardiovascular consequences. Take-home message Staged Hybrid Single Lumen Reconstruction (TIGER) is an effective technique in the management of chronic symptomatic complex type B aortic dissection at the semi acute stage to initiate remodelling and prevent malperfusion, facilitating a straightforward thoracic endovascular aortic repair (TEVAR) made easier by avoiding visceral branch stenting.