To the Editor .— The Working Group of the National High Blood Pressure Education Program recently published updated guidelines on the diagnosis, evaluation, and treatment of high blood pressure (BP) in children and adolescents.1 This is a timely update, and the working group has done a commendable job in most areas of their recommendations. As a long-time student of children's BP measurement, however, I have some concerns about the current BP standards recommended by the working group,1 in particular, the validity of recommending age and height percentiles to express children's BP standards. In a recently published study from the San Antonio Children's Blood Pressure Study,2 we obtained triplicate BP readings by both the auscultatory2 and oscillometric (Dinamap Model 8100)3 methods in >8000 schoolchildren enrolled in kindergarten through 12th grade. We used the currently recommended BP-measuring technique (BP cuff width: 40–50% of the arm circumference; sitting position: K5 [level at which the Korotkoff sounds disappear] as the diastolic pressure; averaging multiple BP readings). In that study, auscultatory systolic pressures were correlated more closely with weight ( r = 0.677) than with height ( r = 0.626), as has been shown by many other studies. More importantly, we found that when age and weight were used in a partial correlation analysis, the effect of height on auscultatory systolic pressure level virtually disappeared …