Chicken Chromosome Research Articles

Chromosome assignment of eight SOX family genes in chicken

Chromosome locations of the eight SOX family genes, SOX1, SOX2, SOX3, SOX5, SOX9, SOX10, SOX14 and SOX21, were determined in the chicken by fluorescence in situ hybridization. The SOX1 and SOX21 genes were localized to chicken chromosome 1q3.1→q3.2, SOX5 to chromosome 1p1.6→p1.4, SOX10 to chromosome 1p1.6, and SOX3 to chromosome 4p1.2→p1.1. The SOX2 and SOX14 genes were shown to be linked to chromosome 9 using two-colored FISH and chromosome painting, and the SOX9 gene was assigned to a pair of microchromosomes. These results suggest that these SOX genes form at least three clusters on chicken chromosomes. The seven SOX genes, SOX1, SOX2, SOX3, SOX5, SOX10, SOX14 and SOX21 were localized to chromosome segments with homologies to human chromosomes, indicating that the chromosome locations of SOX family genes are highly conserved between chicken and human.

Assignment of FUT8 to chicken chromosome band 5q1.4 and to human chromosome 14q23.2→q24.1 by in situ hybridization. Conserved and compared synteny between human and chicken

The human FUT8 gene is implicated in crucial developmental stages and is overexpressed in some tumors and other malignant diseases. Based on three different experiments we have assigned the FUT8 gene to chromosome bands 14q23.2→q24.1 and not 14q24.3 as previously shown (Yamaguchi et al., 1999). We found a high degree of identity between human and chicken FUT8 sequences. We mapped the chicken FUT8 gene to chromosome 5q1.4 in an internal rearrangement of a region of conserved synteny described between human 14q and chicken chromosome 5. Based on these findings we propose a new gene position correspondence between chicken and human comparative maps.

Cytogenetic analysis of California condor (Gymnogyps californianus) chromosomes: comparison with chicken (Gallus gallus) macrochromosomes

The California condor is the largest flying bird in North America and belongs to a group of New World vultures. Recovering from a near fatal population decline, and currently with only 197 extant individuals, the species remains listed as endangered. Very little genetic information exists for this species, although sexing methods employing chromosome analysis or W-chromosome specific amplification is routinely applied for the management of this monomorphic species. Keeping in mind that genetic conditions like chondrodystrophy have been identified, preliminary steps were undertaken in this study to understand the genome organization of the condor. This included an extensive cytogenetic analysis that provided (i) a chromosome number of 80 (with a likelihood of an extra pair of microchromosomes), and (ii) information on the centromeres, telomeres and nucleolus organizer regions. Further, a comparison between condor and chicken macrochromosomes was obtained by using individual chicken chromosome specific paints 1–9 and Z and W on condor metaphase spreads. Except for chromosomes 4 and Z, each of the chicken (GGA) macrochromosomes painted a single condor (GCA) macrochromosome. GGA4 paint detected complete homology with two condor chromosomes, viz., GCA4 and GCA9 providing additional proof that the latter are ancestral chromosomes in the birds. The chicken Z chromosome showed correspondence with both Z and W in the condor. The homology suggests that the condor sex chromosomes have not completely differentiated during evolution, which is unlike the majority of the non-ratites studied up till now. Overall, the study provides detailed cytogenetic and basic comparative information on condor chromosomes. These findings significantly advance the effort to study the chondrodystrophy that is responsible for over ten percent mortality in the condor.

Assignment1 of the chicken NOV gene (alias CCN3) to chromosome 2q34→q36: Conserved and compared synteny between avian, mouse and human

The nephroblastomas induced by the integration of MAV1(N) (avian myeloblastosis-associated virus type 1 N) (Perbal et al., 1985; Soret et al., 1989) in the chicken genome was found to be an attractive model for the study of genes responsible for initiation and establishment of the human pediatric Wilms tumor (Perbal, 1995). Screening of lambda libraries of tumor DNAs allowed us to discover the NOV (nephroblastoma overexpressed) gene (Joliot et al., 1992) whose expression was found to be altered both in avian and human nephroblastomas (Chevalier et al., 1998). The NOV protein belongs to the CCN family of multimodular secreted regulators of cell growth (for a recent review see Perbal, 2001). In normal conditions its expression is associated with polarized differentiation of several different tissues. In human tumors, increased expression of NOV is either a marker of heterotypic differentiation (Chevalier et al., 1998) or associated with increased tumorigenic potential (Manara et al., 2002). Recently, NOV was reported to act as a tumor suppressor in glioblastoma cells (Gupta et al., 2001). The human NOV homolog was previously assigned to human chromosome 8q24 (Martinerie et al., 1992). In the framework of our continued study of the MAV1-(N) integration sites, we report here the localization of the chicken NOV gene on chicken chromosome 2q by fluorescent in situ hybridization. Materials and methods

Localization to chicken Chromosome 5 of a novel locus determining salmonellosis resistance

Clear genetic differences in the susceptibility of chickens to visceral infection by Salmonella have been observed and it has been possible to identify resistant and susceptible lines of inbred chickens. We report here the results of experiments to map directly the gene(s) controlling this trait in chickens by examining crosses between highly susceptible and highly resistant lines. In the mapping panel, a region on chicken Chromosome (Chr) 5 was found to have a large effect on resistance, and this effect was observed in three separate resource populations. Mapping of additional marker loci in the region of the resistance gene further localized it to a region of approximately 2 cM, close to the genes for creatine kinase (CKB) and dynein (DNCH1). This region shows conserved synteny with telomeric regions of human Chr 14 and mouse Chr 12. On the basis of this conserved synteny, this resistance gene seems unlikely to correspond to the previously identified salmonellosis resistance genes Lps (located on mouse Chr 4) or Nos(2) (located on mouse Chr 11). There was no association between Nramp1 and resistance in these crosses, although this gene was shown to contribute to resistance in other crosses. The homologous human and mouse regions at present contain no likely candidate genes for this trait. Thus this appears to be a novel resistance gene, which we designate SAL1.

Physical mapping of the genes encoding tryptophan hydroxylase and insulin to chicken chromosome 5.

Physical mapping of the genes encoding tryptophan hydroxylase and insulin to chicken chromosome 5.

The genes encoding E-selectin (SELE) and lymphotactin (SCYC1) lie on separate chicken chromosomes although they are closely linked in human and mouse.

Three differentially expressed selectin genes (SELE, SELP, and SELL), important in the initial stages of leukocyte extravasation, have been reported in mammals. All three genes map close to the chemokine SCYC1 (small inducible cytokine subfamily C, member 1) in a large conserved chromosomal segment that extends from RXRG (retinoic acid receptor, gamma) to TNNT2 (troponin T2) on Chromosome (Chr) 1 in both human and mouse. In the mouse, we demonstrate that Sele is flanked by Prrx1 (paired-related homeobox gene 1) and Scyc1 and define the order of, and distances between, loci as centromere-Prrx1-(0.7+/-0.7 cM)-Sele-(1.2+/-0.9 cM)-Scyc1-telomere. In the chicken, we isolated BAC clones containing PRRX1, SELE, and SCYC1 and positioned them by fluorescent in situ hybridization. SELE and PRRX1 mapped to the short arm of chicken Chr 8 and SCYC1 mapped to the region equivalent to 1q11-1q13 on the long arm of chicken Chr 1. The location of SELE on chicken Chr 8 was independently established by linkage analysis of COM0185, an (AT)16 microsatellite locus identified in a BAC clone that contained SELE. COM0185 was linked to several loci that mapped to one end of chicken Chr 8, with the order of loci, and genetic distances (in cM) between them defined as MSU0435, MSU0325-(7.8+/-3.7)-COM0185-(5.8+/-3.2)-ROS0338-(9.6+/-4.0)-ABR0322-(3.8+/-2.6)-GLUL. We have therefore positioned an evolutionary breakpoint in mammals and chickens between SELE and SCYC1. Furthermore, comparative mapping analysis of the RXRG-TNNT2 chromosomal segment that is conserved on human and mouse Chr 1 indicates that it is divided into four segments in the chicken, each of which maps to a different chromosome.

Identification of the sex of a wide range of Carinatae birds by PCR using primer sets selected from chicken EE0.6 and its related sequences.

A 0.6 kb EcoRI fragment (EE0.6), cloned from the W chromosome of chickens, is a nonrepetitive sequence and contains an exonlike sequence, ET15, which is likely a part of a pseudogene. The EE0.6 sequence is conserved in all species of birds examined both in Carinatae and Ratitae. A counterpart sequence of EE0.6 is present on the Z chromosome. The extent of diversity between the W- and Z-linked sequences are variable among species. The W- and Z-linked EE0.6 sequences, cloned from 12 different species, were compared and four forward and three reverse primers were selected to amplify parts of the EE0.6 sequence by polymerase chain reaction (PCR). By choosing a suitable combination of primers for EE0.6 and a set of primers for a Z/W-common sequence, as an internal control, the sex of 36 species belonging to 16 different orders of Carinatae could be determined clearly by PCR. The sex of two other species representing different orders could be determined by Southern blot hybridization using ET15 as a probe. For the two Ratitae species, emu and ostrich, EE0.6 sequences on W and Z chromosomes could not be distinguished either by PCR or Southern blotting.

Mapping of the luteinizing hormone/choriogonadotropin receptor gene (LHCGR) to chicken chromosome 3

Source/description: The chicken luteinizing hormone/choriogonadotropin receptor gene has been cloned and sequenced. To produce markers for linkage mapping genomic DNA sequence from exon 7 to exon 9 including the intervening introns and exon was cloned and sequenced (EMBL accession number AJ289775). The intron-exon structure of this region, including exon 8 was the same as in mammalian LHCGR genes. A pair of primers for PCR which gave a single amplification product of 287 bp were then designed for the purposes of mapping. The sequence of the amplified product was confirmed by sequencing (97.6% sequence identity with AJ289775). Polymorphism was revealed by single strand conformation polymorphism (SSCP) analysis. Chromosomal location: Segregation analysis indicated that the chicken luteinizing hormone/choriogonadotropin receptor gene was located on chromosome 3, placing it at position 45.35. The marker for the luteinizing hormone receptor gene (ROS0250) is tightly linked (phi = 0.0) to MCW0169 and ADL0177 with lod scores of 14.4 and 15.7, respectively. There was no evidence for conservation of gene order in this region of chicken chromosome 3 with human or mouse chromosomes.

Mapping of the luteinizing hormone/choriogonadotropin receptor gene (LHCGR) to chicken chromosome 3

Mapping of the luteinizing hormone/choriogonadotropin receptor gene (<i>LHCGR</i>) to chicken chromosome 3

Distribution of HOX genes in the chicken genome reveals a new segment of conservation between human and chicken

Homeobox genes play an important role in the regulation of early embryonic development. They represent a family of evolutionarily highly conserved transcription factors. In this work, several genes that belong to the four HOX gene clusters are assigned by in situ hybridization to four distinct chicken chromosomes. The four gene clusters are mapped to 2p2.1 (HOXA), 3q3.1 (HOXB), 1q3.1 (HOXC) and 7q1.3→ q1.4 (HOXD). We confirm partial homologies already detected by genetic mapping between chicken chromosomes 1, 2 and 7 and human chromosomes 12, 7 and 2 and we describe a new conserved segment between chicken chromosome 3 and human chromosome 17. These results represent the first data that confirm the physical linkage between chicken HOX genes and may improve our understanding of phylogenetic relationships and genome evolution.

Transcripts of the MHM region on the chicken Z chromosome accumulate as non-coding RNA in the nucleus of female cells adjacent to the DMRT1 locus.

The male hypermethylated (MHM) region, located near the middle of the short arm of the Z chromosome of chickens, consists of approximately 210 tandem repeats of a BamHI 2.2-kb sequence unit. Cytosines of the CpG dinucleotides of this region are extensively methylated on the two Z chromosomes in the male but much less methylated on the single Z chromosome in the female. The state of methylation of the MHM region is established after fertilization by about the 1-day embryonic stage. The MHM region is transcribed only in the female from the particular strand into heterogeneous, high molecular-mass, non-coding RNA, which is accumulated at the site of transcription, adjacent to the DMRT1 locus, in the nucleus. The transcriptional silence of the MHM region in the male is most likely caused by the CpG methylation, since treatment of the male embryonic fibroblasts with 5-azacytidine results in hypo-methylation and active transcription of this region. In ZZW triploid chickens, MHM regions are hypomethylated and transcribed on the two Z chromosomes, whereas MHM regions are hypermethylated and transcriptionally inactive on the three Z chromosomes in ZZZ triploid chickens, suggesting a possible role of the W chromosome on the state of the MHM region.

Sequence polymorphisms, allelic expression status and chromosome locations of the chicken IGF2 and MPR1 genes

By screening 26 chicken breeds and lines, DNA polymorphisms were identified in the IGF2 and MPR1 genes, of which mammalian homologues are parentally imprinted, and the GAPD gene, a housekeeping control. Using the polymorphisms as genetic markers, we found that all three genes are expressed biallelically in embryonic tissues. IGF2 and MPR1 were mapped on chicken chromosomes 5 and 3, respectively, by fluorescence in situ hybridization, demonstrating conserved linkage homology between mammals and birds.

A comparative cytogenetic study of chromosome homology between chicken and Japanese quail

In order to construct a chicken (Gallus gallus) cytogenetic map, we isolated 134 genomic DNA clones as new cytogenetic markers from a chicken cosmid DNA library, and mapped these clones to chicken chromosomes by fluorescence in situ hybridization. Forty-five and 89 out of 134 clones were localized to macrochromosomes and microchromosomes, respectively. The 45 clones, which localized to chicken macrochromosomes (Chromosomes 1–8 and the Z chromosome) were used for comparative mapping of Japanese quail (Coturnix japonica). The chromosome locations of the DNA clones and their gene orders in Japanese quail were quite similar to those of chicken, while Japanese quail differed from chicken in chromosomes 1, 2, 4 and 8. We specified the breakpoints of pericentric inversions in chromosomes 1 and 2 by adding mapping data of 13 functional genes using chicken cDNA clones. The presence of a pericentric inversion was also confirmed in chromosome 8. We speculate that more than two rearrangements are contained in the centromeric region of chromosome 4. All 30 clones that mapped to chicken microchromosomes also localized to Japanese quail microchromosomes, suggesting that chromosome homology is highly conserved between chicken and Japanese quail and that few chromosome rearrangements occurred in the evolution of the two species.

Assignment1 of the homologue of human JAG1 to chicken chromosome 3q11 by in situ hybridization

Assignment<footref rid="foot01">1</footref> of the homologue of human JAG1 to chicken chromosome 3q11 by in situ hybridization

Assignment1 of TERF1 to chicken chromosome 2q32 and TERF2 to chicken microchromosome 11 by fluorescence in situ hybridization

Assignment<footref rid="foot01">1</footref> of TERF1 to chicken chromosome 2q32 and TERF2 to chicken microchromosome 11 by fluorescence in situ hybridization

Compositional mapping of chicken chromosomes and identification of the gene-richest regions.

'Compositional chromosomal mapping', namely the assessment of the GC level of chromosomal bands, led to the identification, in the human chromosomes, of the GC-richest H3+ bands and of the GC-poorest L1+ bands, which were so called on the basis of the isochore family predominantly present in the bands. The isochore organization of the avian genome is very similar to those of most mammals, the only difference being the presence of an additional, GC-richest, H4 isochore family. In contrast, the avian karyotypes are very different from those of mammals, being characterized, in most species, by few macrochromosomes and by a large number of microchromosomes. The 'compositional mapping' of chicken mitotic and meiotic chromosomes by in-situ hybridization of isochore families showed that the chicken GC-richest isochores are localized not only on a large number of microchromosomes but also on almost all telomeric bands of macrochromosomes. On the other hand, the GC-poorest isochores are generally localized on the internal regions of macrochromosomes and are almost absent in microchromosomes. Thus, the distinct localization of the GC-richest and the GC-poorest bands observed on human chromosomes appears to be a general feature of chromosomes from warm-blooded vertebrates.

Mapping of the leptin receptor gene (LEPR) to chicken chromosome 8

Mapping of the leptin receptor gene (<i>LEPR</i>) to chicken chromosome 8

Mapping of the leptin receptor gene (LEPR) to chicken chromosome 8.

Mapping of the leptin receptor gene (LEPR) to chicken chromosome 8.

Molecular analysis of avian circadian clock genes

Unlike mammals, avian circadian rhythms are regulated by a multiple oscillatory system consisting of the retina, the pineal and the suprachiasmatic nucleus in the hypothalamus. To understand avian circadian system, we have cloned Clock and Period homologs ( qClock, qPer2 and qPer3) and characterized these genes in Japanese quail. Overall, qCLOCK, qPER2 and qPER3 showed ∼79%, ∼46% and ∼33% amino acid identity to mCLOCK, mPER2, mPER3, respectively. Clock was mapped to quail chromosome 4 and chicken chromosome 4q1.6-q2.1. Per2 and Per3 genes were both localized to microchromosomes. qClock mRNA was expressed throughout the day, while qPer2 and qPer3 showed robust circadian oscillation in the eye and the pineal gland. All three genes were expressed in various tissues. In addition, qPer2 mRNA was induced by light, but neither qClock nor qPer3 was induced. These results can explain the molecular basis for circadian entrainment in Japanese quail and also provide new avenues for molecular understanding of avian circadian clock and photoperiodism.