Reviewed by: International Perspectives on Chicana/o Studies ed. by Catherine Leen and Niamh Thornton Elena Foulis Catherine Leen and Niamh Thornton, eds. International Perspectives on Chicana/o Studies. New York: Routledge, 2014. 208p. Lee and Thornton’s volume on Chicano/a studies provides a much needed conversation on the evolving nature of Chicano/a literature and culture within a transnational perspective. In this book, the editors and contributors provide us with various noted critics and theorists such as Ellen Mckracken, Francisco Lomelí and Maria Herrera-Sobek that make it clear that Chicano/a studies has crossed borders. This collection makes it evident that Chicano/a studies is increasingly awaking interest in comparative studies all across the world. The book is divided into three parts. Part one titled, “Critical Paradigms: Continuities and Transitions” takes us directly to the study of Chicana culture, literary production and representation. The authors in this section, including the notable critic, Ellen Mckracken, give a history of the struggle and success in publications of U.S. Latino/a literature. From the now canonical writers such as Sandra Cisneros, Julia Alvarez, and Junot Diaz, to the successful half million dollar advance Alisa Valdez-Rodríguez received for her novel, Mckracken acknowledges the very important role of small presses in developing U.S. Latino/a literature. However, she believes that U.S. Latino/a literature has reached a new height and has to seek audiences that mainstream presses provide. Imelda Martín-Junquera and Mario T. García study the use of autobiography, memory and history in the works of Pat Mora and Mary Helen Ponce’s work, respectively. In both cases, Martín-Junquero and García provide an analysis of the authors’ use of bicultural, bilingual, historical, auto-ethnography and many other traditional thematic elements found in Chicana literature to explain the connections between food, the environment, and female space. The essays help us understand the authors’ [End Page 236] role in “translating” culture to the reader, thus inviting us to consider the subtitle of this collection, “This World is My Place.” The essays found in Part two titled, “From the Regional to the Global,” study the often complicated understanding of national borders and globalization. However, Tatiana Voronchenko’s comparative approach of Chicano/a and Russian literature provides us with a keen international connection this edition represents. In her examination of American studies in Russia, Voronchenko finds that the similar geopolitical and geographic conditions of both groups, “is evident in the cultural production of the southern border region of the Unites States and is a salient feature of the cultural life of Russia, especially Siberia” (71). Even more, both Chicanos/as and Siberians are ethnic minorities, bilingual and bicultural. Throughout her essay, her careful exploration of the connection both groups share is notable in her thorough analysis of the works and motifs each group explores. For example, both groups use the sun motif and the virgin in their literature and cultural production. This shared element is clear in Voronchenko’s study of both literatures, and those of us that study and teach Chicano/a literature can engage more easily with Siberian literature. She concludes that Chicano/o studies in Trans-Baikal Siberia, “is significant in itself, but it also helps us to better understand contemporary U.S. literary discourse” (85); especially when we think of the similar challenges found in different parts of the world. In this same section, Niamh Thornton, Nuala Finnegan, and Francisco Lomelí touch on cultural traditions, human rights concerns, and the production of artifacts as both fetishisms and a vindication of Mexican-American identities. Thornton studies the internationalization of Quinceañeras. She traces the young girl’s rite of passage, but also how it has slowly acquired the pressures of a consumer culture that is often in conflict with tradition. One of the most notable analyses in this essay is Thornton’s study of Julia Alvarez’s work on this subject. Thornton finds that Alvarez, “problematically associates the maintenance and authenticity of culture purely to the working class and denies other classes the right to practice tradition, because, for her, community can only be understood in working-class terms” (59), a position...
Read full abstract