Chest Physicians Research Articles

Hemorrhages and risk factors in patients undergoing thromboprophylaxis in a respiratory critical care unit: a secondary data analysis of a cohort study

ObjectiveTo verify whether the bleeding risk assessment guidelines from the 9th American College of Chest Physicians (ACCP) are prognostic for respiratory intensive care unit (RICU) patients and to explore risk factors for hemorrhages, we conducted a secondary data analysis based on our previously published cohort study of venous thromboembolism.Patients and methodsWe performed a secondary data analysis on the single-center prospective cohort from our previous study. Patients admitted to the RICU at Beijing Chao-Yang Hospital from August 1, 2014 to December 31, 2020 were included and followed up until discharge.ResultsThe study enrolled 931 patients, of which 715 (76.8%) were at high risk of bleeding, while the remaining were at low risk. Of the total, 9.2% (86/931) suffered major bleeding, and no significant difference was found between the two risk groups (p = 0.601). High-risk patients had poor outcomes, including higher mortality and longer stays. Independent risk factors for major bleeding were APACHE II score ≥ 15; invasive pulmonary aspergillosis; therapeutic dose of anticoagulants; extracorporeal membrane oxygenation; and continuous renal replacement therapy. Blood transfusion not related to bleeding appeared to be an independent protective factor for major bleeding (OR 0.099, 95% CI 0.045–0.218, p < 0.001).ConclusionBleeding risk assessment models from the 9th ACCP guidelines may not be suitable for patients in RICU. Building a bleeding risk assessment model that is suitable for patients in all RICUs remains a challenge.Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02213978.

Variation among venous thromboembolism risk assessment tools for postcesarean patients: a retrospective cohort study.

Venous thromboembolism (VTE) risk in pregnant women is four to five-fold higher than in nonpregnant women, and the risk of VTE is an additional four-fold higher after Cesarean section compared to normal vaginal delivery. Recommendations regarding anticoagulant prophylaxis are inconsistent across international guidelines, and VTE remains one of the leading causes of maternal morbidity and mortality. This study aimed to compare the need for postcesarean anticoagulation for VTE prophylaxis based on three major guidelines and our own institutional protocol. It was a retrospective cohort study that reviewed the medical records of patients who underwent a cesarean section at a tertiary-level care hospital in the United Arab Emirates (UAE). The need for anticoagulation was assessed using clinical tools from the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG), Royal College Obstetricians and Gynecologists (RCOG), American College of Chest Physicians (ACCP), and the study site hospital protocol. A total of 1134 postcesarean women, aged 18-55 years, were included in the study. Most patients (87%) were at moderate risk for VTE. According to the study site hospital tool, 90.7% qualified for anticoagulant prophylaxis, while the ACOG, RCOG, and ACCP tools indicated that 0.5, 90.9, and 36.7% qualified, respectively. Enoxaparin was the primary anticoagulant used in 95% of cases. Only one patient developed VTE during the follow-up period. Anticoagulation needs assessment tools vary extensively in their estimations, highlighting the need for a uniform tool across multiple societies to establish a consistent standard of care and guide the development of evidence-based, site-specific protocols.

Assessment of ultrasound-guided tru-cut needle pleural biopsy in the diagnosis of unexplained exudative pleural effusion compared to medical thoracoscopy

Background Ultrasound-guided needle biopsy (USGNB) allows for precise and immediate viewing of pleural lesions, effusions, and needle placement without ionizing radiation. This study aimed to assess the efficacy of US-guided tru-cut needle pleural biopsy in diagnosing unexplained exudative pleural effusion compared to medical thoracoscopy (MT), focusing on safety, accuracy, time, and cost of the treatment. Patients and methods This observational cross-sectional research was conducted on 40 patients over 18 years old, of both sexes, with unexplained exudative pleural effusion. The patients were randomly separated into two equal groups. The girst group is USGNB and the second group is MT. Results Group II exhibited substantially greater costs, sedation levels, procedure duration, biopsy site discomfort, surgical emphysema, lung expansion failure, and psychological distress compared to group I (P&lt;0.05). There was no notable disparity between the two groups regarding radiological detection of pleural effusion, pleural fluid properties, procedural observations, histological results, and diagnostic effectiveness. The duration of hospitalization was considerably shorter in group I compared to group II, assessed from the day of the operation to the day of release (P=0.001). Conclusion USGNB is an important tool in the diagnosis of pleural effusion after failure of pleural fluid analysis, which is performed by a chest physician is an accurate, safer, lower in cost, and shorter in duration with fewer complications compared with MT.

Mortality predictors in emergency department adult patients with sepsis: A systematic review

Background: Sepsis was regarded as a major global public health concern; it continues to be associated with a high death rate despite advancements in contemporary treatment. This research aims to evaluate the predictive effect of clinical scoring systems and biomarkers for sepsis patients in ED. Method: In accordance with PRISMA principles, we carried out this systematic review. We used the internet databases MEDLINE, Google Scholar, and EMBASE to conduct a thorough search of the literature. Articles written in English and released between 2015 and 2023 were involved in the search. Using predictors and ED, we first conducted a comprehensive search that included sepsis and infectious illnesses. Result: A total of 3029 patients from 7 publications—3 cohort, 2 observational, and 2 case control studies—were included in this study. The study by Song et al. in 2019 had the highest fatality rate (46.6%), while the study by Duplessis et al. in 2018 had the lowest mortality rate (6.4%). SIRS criteria, qSOFA score, International Sepsis Conference 2001, and American College of Chest Physicians Guidelines are the diagnostic criteria that are employed. AUC varied from 33.7 (MMP9) to 0.89 (IL-6). Conclusion: AUC was increased significantly when CSSs were combined with IgE, presepsin, IL-6 and PCT.

Treatment of interstitial lung disease in systemic sclerosis: guidelines and new clinical trial results.

Interstitial lung disease (ILD) is the leading cause of death in patients with systemic sclerosis-associated interstitial lung disease (SSc-ILD). The American College of Rheumatology (ACR), in conjunction with the American College of Chest Physicians (CHEST), recently published clinical practice guidelines for the treatment of adults with systemic autoimmune rheumatic disease-associated ILD, including SSc-ILD. Herein, we summarize evidence from randomized trials evaluating the safety and efficacy of pharmacologic therapies for the treatment of SSc-ILD. In this review, we present findings from recent randomized controlled trials in SSc-ILD. The pharmacologic therapies discussed include immunosuppressive medications (mycophenolate, cyclophosphamide, rituximab, and tocilizumab) and antifibrotic medications (nintedanib and pirfenidone). Randomized trials provide an evidence base for the SSc-ILD treatment recommendations put forth in the ACR/CHEST Guidelines for the treatment of ILD in people with systemic autoimmune rheumatic diseases. These guidelines will help inform clinical practice and highlight areas in which further research is needed.

Perioperative antithrombotic medication: An approach for the primary care clinician.

The primary care clinician faces many challenges and is often left to manage complex pathology because of resource constraints at higher levels of care. One of these complex conditions is the perioperative management of antithrombotic medication. This narrative review is focused on helping the clinician navigate the complex path and multiple guidelines related to the perioperative use of antithrombotic medication. Perioperative antithrombotic guidelines (American College of Chest Physicians, European Society of Regional Anaesthesia, and American Society of Regional Anesthesia) and relevant publications were identified by a PubMed search using the terms perioperative AND anticoagulants OR antithrombotics AND guideline. Issues relevant to clinical practice were identified, and attempts were made to explain any ambiguity that arose. Adhering to basic pharmacological principles and evidence-based guidelines allows for the safe usage of antithrombotics. Knowing when to stop, continue, bridge and restart antithrombotic medication prevents perioperative morbidity and mortality. Stopping antithrombotic medication too early can lead to thromboembolic complications associated with their primary disease process. Not stopping antithrombotic medication or stopping it too late can potentially cause life-threatening bleeding, haematomas and increased transfusion requirements.

Hypersensitivity Pneumonitis on Thin-Section Chest CT Scans: Diagnostic Performance of the ATS/JRS/ALAT versus ACCP Imaging Guidelines.

Purpose To compare the diagnostic performance of the American Thoracic Society, Japanese Respiratory Society, and Asociación Latinoamericana del Tórax (ATS/JRS/ALAT) versus the American College of Chest Physicians (ACCP) imaging classifications for hypersensitivity pneumonitis (HP). Materials and Methods Patients in the institutional review board-approved Interstitial Lung Disease (ILD) registry referred for multidisciplinary discussion (MDD) at the authors' institution (January 1, 2006-April 1, 2021) were included in this retrospective study when ILD was diagnosed at MDD. MDD diagnoses included HP, connective tissue disease-ILD, and idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Retrospective review of thin-section CT images was performed in consensus by two cardiothoracic radiologists blinded to the diagnosis. Diagnostic patterns were determined for thin-section CT images using both classifications. Discordance rates were determined. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value, and accuracy were assessed using MDD diagnosis as the reference standard. Results A total of 297 patients were included in the study: 200 (67%) with HP, 49 (16%) with connective tissue disease-ILD, and 48 (16%) with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis at MDD. The discordance rate between the two classifications was 21%. Assuming low HP prevalence (10%), ATS/JRS/ALAT classification outperformed ACCP classification, with greater accuracy (92.3% vs 87.6%) and greater positive predictive value (60.7% vs 42.9%). Assuming high prevalence (50%), accuracy and negative predictive value were superior using ACCP classification (81.7% vs 79.7% and 77.7% vs 72.6%, respectively), and positive predictive value was superior using ATS/JRS/ALAT classification (93.3% vs 87.1%). Conclusion Accuracy of the ATS/JRS/ALAT and ACCP HP classifications was greater in settings with low and high HP prevalence, respectively. Diagnostic performance of both classifications was discordant in a minority of cases. Keywords: CT, Thorax, Hypersensitivity Pneumonitis, Interstitial Lung Disease Supplemental material is available for this article. © RSNA, 2024.

Expert consensus on clinical application of inhaled nitric oxide therapy (2024 edition)

Inhaled nitric oxide (iNO) is a selective pulmonary vasodilator that has been used in newborns, children, and adults with various cardiopulmonary diseases to reduce pulmonary artery pressure and improve oxygenation. Currently, there are numerous brands of iNO devices on the market with significant differences in performance, as well as variations in connection and setup. Additionally, adverse reactions such as methemoglobinemia may occur during iNO treatment. Therefore, the safety and efficacy of this treatment need to be ensured in clinical practice. To address these concerns and standardize the clinical application of iNO therapy, the Respiratory Care Group of Chinese Thoracic Society and Respiratory Therapist Working Group of Respiratory Career Development Committee, Chinese Association of Chest Physician have organized relevant experts to develop an expert consensus on the clinical application of iNO therapy based on the latest research progress and clinical operational experience. This consensus includes 11 expert consensus recommendations on indications and contraindications of iNO, selection and connection of iNO devices, dose selection and therapeutic effect evaluation of iNO, adverse effects and occupational protection during iNO treatment, transport of patients with iNO, weaning of iNO, cleaning, disinfection and maintenance of iNO devices, and iNO clinical use process and records. The aim is to improve the cognitive and practical ability of clinical practitioners for the standardized application of iNO therapy, so as to ensure the safety and effectiveness of clinical application of iNO therapy.

2023 American College of Rheumatology (ACR)/American College of Chest Physicians (CHEST) Guideline for the Screening and Monitoring of Interstitial Lung Disease in People with Systemic Autoimmune Rheumatic Diseases.

We provide evidence-based recommendations regarding screening for interstitial lung disease (ILD) and the monitoring for ILD progression in people with systemic autoimmune rheumatic diseases (SARDs), specifically rheumatoid arthritis, systemic sclerosis, idiopathic inflammatory myopathies, mixed connective tissue disease, and Sjögren disease. We developed clinically relevant population, intervention, comparator, and outcomes questions related to screening and monitoring for ILD in patients with SARDs. A systematic literature review was performed, and the available evidence was rated using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation methodology. A Voting Panel of interdisciplinary clinician experts and patients achieved consensus on the direction and strength of each recommendation. Fifteen recommendations were developed. For screening people with these SARDs at risk for ILD, we conditionally recommend pulmonary function tests (PFTs) and high-resolution computed tomography of the chest (HRCT chest); conditionally recommend against screening with 6-minute walk test distance (6MWD), chest radiography, ambulatory desaturation testing, or bronchoscopy; and strongly recommend against screening with surgical lung biopsy. We conditionally recommend monitoring ILD with PFTs, HRCT chest, and ambulatory desaturation testing and conditionally recommend against monitoring with 6MWD, chest radiography, or bronchoscopy. We provide guidance on ILD risk factors and suggestions on frequency of testing to evaluate for the development of ILD in people with SARDs. This clinical practice guideline presents the first recommendations endorsed by the American College of Rheumatology and American College of Chest Physicians for the screening and monitoring of ILD in people with SARDs.

2023 American College of Rheumatology (ACR)/American College of Chest Physicians (CHEST) Guideline for the Treatment of Interstitial Lung Disease in People with Systemic Autoimmune Rheumatic Diseases.

We provide evidence-based recommendations regarding the treatment of interstitial lung disease (ILD) in adults with systemic autoimmune rheumatic diseases (SARDs). We developed clinically relevant population, intervention, comparator, and outcomes questions. A systematic literature review was then performed, and the available evidence was rated using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation methodology. A panel of clinicians and patients reached consensus on the direction and strength of the recommendations. Thirty-five recommendations were generated (including two strong recommendations) for first-line SARD-ILD treatment, treatment of SARD-ILD progression despite first-line ILD therapy, and treatment of rapidly progressive ILD. The strong recommendations were against using glucocorticoids in systemic sclerosis-ILD as a first-line ILD therapy and after ILD progression. Otherwise, glucocorticoids are conditionally recommended for first-line ILD treatment in all other SARDs. This clinical practice guideline presents the first recommendations endorsed by the American College of Rheumatology and American College of Chest Physicians for the treatment of ILD in people with SARDs.

2023 American College of Rheumatology (ACR)/American College of Chest Physicians (CHEST) Guideline for the Screening and Monitoring of Interstitial Lung Disease in People with Systemic Autoimmune Rheumatic Diseases.

We provide evidence-based recommendations regarding screening for interstitial lung disease (ILD) and the monitoring for ILD progression in people with systemic autoimmune rheumatic diseases (SARDs), specifically rheumatoid arthritis, systemic sclerosis, idiopathic inflammatory myopathies, mixed connective tissue disease, and Sjögren disease. We developed clinically relevant population, intervention, comparator, and outcomes questions related to screening and monitoring for ILD in patients with SARDs. A systematic literature review was performed, and the available evidence was rated using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation methodology. A Voting Panel of interdisciplinary clinician experts and patients achieved consensus on the direction and strength of each recommendation. Fifteen recommendations were developed. For screening people with these SARDs at risk for ILD, we conditionally recommend pulmonary function tests (PFTs) and high-resolution computed tomography of the chest (HRCT chest); conditionally recommend against screening with 6-minute walk test distance (6MWD), chest radiography, ambulatory desaturation testing, or bronchoscopy; and strongly recommend against screening with surgical lung biopsy. We conditionally recommend monitoring ILD with PFTs, HRCT chest, and ambulatory desaturation testing and conditionally recommend against monitoring with 6MWD, chest radiography, or bronchoscopy. We provide guidance on ILD risk factors and suggestions on frequency of testing to evaluate for the development of ILD in people with SARDs. This clinical practice guideline presents the first recommendations endorsed by the American College of Rheumatology and American College of Chest Physicians for the screening and monitoring of ILD in people with SARDs.

2023 American College of Rheumatology (ACR)/American College of Chest Physicians (CHEST) Guideline for the Treatment of Interstitial Lung Disease in People with Systemic Autoimmune Rheumatic Diseases.

We provide evidence-based recommendations regarding the treatment of interstitial lung disease (ILD) in adults with systemic autoimmune rheumatic diseases (SARDs). We developed clinically relevant population, intervention, comparator, and outcomes questions. A systematic literature review was then performed, and the available evidence was rated using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation methodology. A panel of clinicians and patients reached consensus on the direction and strength of the recommendations. Thirty-five recommendations were generated (including two strong recommendations) for first-line SARD-ILD treatment, treatment of SARD-ILD progression despite first-line ILD therapy, and treatment of rapidly progressive ILD. The strong recommendations were against using glucocorticoids in systemic sclerosis-ILD as a first-line ILD therapy and after ILD progression. Otherwise, glucocorticoids are conditionally recommended for first-line ILD treatment in all other SARDs. This clinical practice guideline presents the first recommendations endorsed by the American College of Rheumatology and American College of Chest Physicians for the treatment of ILD in people with SARDs.

Assessing Patient Values and Preferences to Inform the 2023 American College of Rheumatology/American College of Chest Physicians Interstitial Lung Disease Guidelines.

Patient engagement is critical to clinical practice guideline (CPG) development. This work presents our approach to ascertaining patients' values and preferences to inform the American College of Rheumatology guidelines for screening, monitoring, and treatment of interstitial lung disease (ILD) in people with systemic autoimmune rheumatic diseases (SARDs). We conducted a cross-sectional qualitative study of a purposefully sampled Patient Panel using a modified content analytic approach. The study team reviewed text transcripts from the Patient Panel discussion to identify themes and develop a clustered thematic schema. Twenty-one patients (75% women) participated, with a mean age of 53 years (range 33-73). Patients had one or more SARDs: systemic sclerosis (38%), Sjögren disease (38%), idiopathic inflammatory myopathy (33%), rheumatoid arthritis (24%), and mixed connective tissue disease (10%). We identified 10 themes in 4 thematic clusters: communication, screening and monitoring, treatment goals, and treatment adverse effects. Patients prioritized recognizing ILD symptoms, importance of ILD screening and close monitoring, goals of survival and improving quality of life, and willingness to accept treatment risks provided that there is close communication with providers. Patient representatives shared patients' priorities and insight at the Voting Panel meeting, influencing multiple guideline recommendations. Patient engagement fosters a holistic approach to CPG development, leading to recommendations aiming for the best clinical outcomes while prioritizing outcomes important for patients. The patient-identified themes played a critical role in ILD guideline development and provide core elements for shared decision-making as clinicians make management and therapeutic decisions with patients with SARD-associated ILD.

Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (2024 edition)

Chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) is classified as group 4 pulmonary hypertension, characterized by pulmonary arterial thrombotic occlusion leading to vascular stenosis or obstruction, progressive elevation of pulmonary vascular resistance and pulmonary arterial pressure, ultimately leading to right heart failure and even death. Recent years have seen rapid progress in the diagnostic and therapeutic in CTEPH field. More and more patients with CTEPH have been accurately diagnosed and assessed in time. Nevertheless, there is still a lot of work to do in the popularization of CTEPH diagnostic and therapeutic technique and the building of CTEPH expert center. To better guide clinical practice in our country, Pulmonary Embolism & Pulmonary Vascular Diseases Group of the Chinese Thoracic Society, Pulmonary Embolism & Pulmonary Vascular Disease Working Group of Chinese Association of Chest Physicians, National Cooperation Group on Prevention & Treatment of Pulmonary Embolism & Pulmonary Vascular Disease, National Expert Panel on the Development of a Standardized Framework for Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension, convened multidisciplinary experts for deliberation and Delphi expert consensus to develop the "Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Chronic Thromboembolic Pulmonary Hypertension (2024 edition) ". These guidelines systematically evaluate domestic and international evidence-based medical research on CTEPH and propose recommendations tailored to clinical practice in our country. The key areas covered include definitions, epidemiology, pathogenesis, diagnosis and assessment, treatment, and management, with the aim of further standardizing the clinical diagnosis and treatment of CTEPH in our country.

Integrative oncology for patients with lung cancer: A prospective pragmatic controlled trial

IntroductionComplementary medicine and integrative oncology modalities (IOM) have been included in the clinical practice guidelines of the American College of Chest Physicians in the treatments of patients with lung cancer. The present study examined the impact of a patient-tailored IOM treatment program on quality of life (QoL)-related concerns among patients with non-small and small lung cancer undergoing active oncology treatment. MethodsThis controlled study was pragmatic and prospective assessing the adherence among patients referred by their oncology healthcare provider to an integrative physician consultation, followed by 6 weekly IOM treatments addressing QoL-related concerns. High adherence to integrative care (high-AIC, vs. low-AIC) was defined as attending ≥4 IOM sessions. Symptoms were assessed using the ESAS (Edmonton Symptom Assessment Scale), EORTC QLQ-C30 (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire), and MYCAW (Measure Yourself Concerns and Wellbeing) tools, at baseline and 6 weeks. ResultsOf 153 patients, 74 (48 %) were high-AIC, with baseline demographic, cancer-and QoL-related characteristics similar to those of low-AIC patients. At 6 weeks, high-AIC patients reported greater improvement on MYCAW well-being (p = 0.036), with within-group improvement observed for EORTC pain (p = 0.021) and emotional functioning (p = 0.041); and for ESAS depression (p = 0.005), with borderline significance for EORTC sleep (p = 0.06). ConclusionHigh adherence to a 6-week IOM program within supportive/palliative care for patients with lung cancer was found to alleviate pain and emotional concerns, improving overall QoL. Further research is needed to confirm the findings in real-life IOM practice for patients with lung cancer.

Cardio-pulmonary exercise testing aids chronic obstructive pulmonary disease diagnosis in the perioperative evaluation of patients undergoing radical cystectomy

Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) is a chronic lung condition distinguished by structural changes and mucus build-up which causes dyspnoea. COPD is universally diagnosed by a spirometry test. A Forced Expiratory Volume in one second (FEV1)/Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) of &lt;0.7, is often used to justify COPD diagnosis (Hopkinson et al., 2019, Brit Med J, 366, l4486). Reliance on spirometry tests alone may only highlight airway obstruction and not identify other consequences of COPD like impaired gas exchange which is implicated in the development of postoperative pulmonary complications. Cardio-pulmonary exercise testing (CPET) provides a more detailed look into the pathophysiology of COPD and is routinely used in perioperative settings to determine a patient’s fitness for surgery. The aims of this study were to 1) identify the number of bladder cancer patients with undiagnosed COPD, and 2) compare COPD-related CPET variables between bladder cancer patients medically diagnosed with COPD (COPDMED) who had the potential to be diagnosed at the time of CPET (COPDCPET) and those without COPD (non-COPD). All testing was performed per the American Thoracic Society/American College of Chest Physicians guidelines (2003, Am J Resp Crit Care Med, 167, 211-277). COPD-related CPET variables recorded included Minute Ventilation (V̇E; L·min-1), Peak Oxygen Consumption (V̇O2peak; mL·kg-1·min-1), the Anaerobic Threshold (AT; mL·kg-1·min-1), Ventilatory Equivalence for Carbon Dioxide (V̇E/V̇CO2), Breathing Reserve (BR; %). Eighty-two patients with bladder cancer (COPDMED [n=9], non-COPD [n=73]) underwent preoperative spirometry and CPET. In the non-COPD patients, 21 (29%) had an FEV1/FVC&lt; 0.7, indicative of COPD and thus groups as COPDCPET. Within the COPDCPET group, 8 (40%) had an FEV1 between 50-70% of predicted which indicated moderate COPD. There was no difference found in all CPET variables measured between COPDMED and COPDCPET (P &gt; 0.05). When COPDMED and COPDCPET were combined and compared against the non-COPD, there was a difference found in their median (95% CI) V̇Erest (13.3 [12.3-14.2] vs 11.75 [11.2-12.6] L·min-1, P = 0.02, g = 0.28). V̇O2peak (14.95 [13.64-18.12] vs 17.16 [16.35-19.11] mL·kg-1·min-1, P = 0.049, g = 0.29). V̇E/V̇CO2 at the AT (38 [36-40] vs 36 [34-37], P = 0.04, g = 0.49). There was also a difference in mean +/- SD BR (36 +/- 17 % vs 47 +/- 14 %, P = 0.004, g = 0.69). This study demonstrates the underdiagnosis of COPD in perioperative settings. Future research should assess the use of targeted COPD optimisation preoperatively.

Incidence of radiographic and clinically significant pneumothorax or hemothorax after thoracic discectomy via mini-open lateral retropleural approach without prophylactic chest tube placement.

The mini-open lateral retropleural (MO-LRP) approach is an effective option for surgically treating thoracic disc herniations, but the approach raises concerns for pneumothorax (PTX). However, chest tube placement causes insertion site tenderness, necessitates consultation services, increases radiation exposure (requires multiple radiographs), delays the progression of care, and increases narcotic requirements. This study examined the incidence of radiographic and clinically significant PTX and hemothorax (HTX) after the MO-LRP approach, without the placement of a prophylactic chest tube, for thoracic disc herniation. This study was a single-institution retrospective evaluation of consecutive cases from 2017 to 2022. Electronic medical records were reviewed, including postoperative chest radiographs, radiology and operative reports, and postoperative notes. The presence of PTX or HTX was determined on chest radiographs obtained in all patients immediately after surgery, with interval radiographs if either was present. The size was categorized as large (≥ 3 cm) or small (< 3 cm) based on guidelines of the American College of Chest Physicians. PTX or HTX was considered clinically significant if it required intervention. Thirty patients underwent thoracic discectomy via the MO-LRP approach. All patients were included. Twenty patients were men (67%), and 10 (33%) were women. The patients ranged in age from 25 to 74 years. The most commonly treated level was T11-12 (n = 11, 37%). Intraoperative violation of parietal pleura occurred in 5 patients (17%). No patient had prophylactic chest tube placement. Fifteen patients (50%) had PTX on postoperative chest radiographs; 2 patients had large PTXs, and 13 had small PTXs. Both patients with large PTXs had expansion on repeat radiographs and were treated with chest tube insertion. Of the 13 patients with a small PTX, 1 required 100% oxygen using a nonrebreather mask; the remainder were asymptomatic. One patient, who had no abnormal findings on the immediate postoperative chest radiograph, developed an incidental HTX on postoperative day 6 and was treated with chest tube insertion. Thus, 3 patients (10%) required a chest tube: 2 for expanding PTX and 1 for delayed HTX. Most patients who undergo thoracic discectomy via the MO-LRP approach do not develop clinically significant PTX or HTX. PTX and HTX in this patient population should be treated with a chest tube only when there are postoperative clinical and radiographic indications.

Pulmonologists’ Attitudes and Role in Precision Medicine Biomarker Testing for Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Despite advances in precision medicine for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), biomarker testing for these therapies remain frequently underused, delayed, and inequitable. Pulmonologists often play a critical role in the initial diagnostic steps for patients with lung cancer, and previous data show variability in their knowledge and practices regarding biomarker testing. The purpose of this study is to better understand how pulmonologists view their role in lung cancer care. With the increasing importance of biomarker testing and precision medicine, how do pulmonologists view their role in lung cancer care? An electronic survey consisting of 31 items focused on attitudes and practices regarding diagnostic steps for NSCLC was randomly distributed to a sample of practicing pulmonologists in the American College of Chest Physicians (CHEST) analytics database. Inferential statistics were performed using χ2 tests and multivariable logistic regression models. A total of 401 pulmonologists responded to the survey. Most (92%) were general pulmonologists, and more than half (62%) indicate they order biomarker testing. Longer practice tenure, higher case volumes, and participation in a multidisciplinary tumor board were associated with ordering biomarkers (P< .05). Pulmonology was identified to have the leading responsibility for the initial diagnostic biopsy by most respondents (83%) and less often for staging (45%), leading discussions about biomarker testing with patients (28%), and for ordering biomarkers (22%). The most common reasons for not ordering biomarkers included the following: oncology was responsible (84%), it was not within their scope of practice (46%), or lack of the necessary knowledge (51%). Pulmonologists vary in their practices for ordering biomarkers, and many defer this responsibility to oncology. Despite the role of bronchoscopy and pulmonology societal guidelines for staging, many defer leadership of this process. Many pulmonologists lack the necessary resources and multidisciplinary infrastructure likely required to efficiently accomplish biomarker testing.

Perioperative Management of Antithrombotic Therapy in Patients Undergoing Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery: A Practical Tool Based on Current Guidelines

Introduction: Given the aging population, plastic surgeons are increasingly faced with the challenge of balancing procedural bleeding risk with thromboembolic risk in patients receiving antithrombotic therapies undergoing elective procedures. Guideline recommendations remain unclear in this population, which contributes to heterogeneity in clinical practices. We present a practical approach that summarizes guideline recommendations to facilitate the perioperative management of patients requiring surgery who are already on antithrombotic agents. Methods: Due to the scarcity of plastic surgery-specific guidelines, recommendations were primarily adapted from the 2022 American College of Chest Physicians guidelines on perioperative management of antithrombotic therapy as they are recognized as authoritative and widely used in clinical practice. Results: A clinical practice conceptual framework was adapted based on preexisting guidelines, dividing decision-making into 3 steps: (1) assessing the procedural bleeding risk; (2) assessing the patients’ thromboembolic risk; and (3) determining appropriate management according to antithrombotic agent type. Specific indications are provided for continuing, stopping, and bridging anticoagulants and antiplatelet agents, as well as for consultation with a cardiologist or hematologist. Conclusion: The present framework can be implemented in plastic surgeons’ clinical practice to guide the management of patients on antithrombotic therapies, while minimizing nonessential referrals to the thrombosis service. The lack of plastic surgery-specific guidelines on this topic highlights a need for further research to “bootstrap” the risk categorization of plastic surgical procedures and their appropriate perioperative management.

Chronic cough diagnosis, treatment, and referral practices among family physicians in the United States: a survey study

BackgroundCough is one of the most common presenting problems for patients in primary care and is largely managed in primary care clinical settings. Family physicians’ familiarity with chronic cough guidelines and the extent to which these guidelines translate into everyday practice have not been well described. The objective of this study was to characterize current diagnosis, treatment, and referral practices among family physicians and to identify potentially impactful strategies to optimize chronic cough management in primary care.MethodsWe conducted a cross-sectional survey of 5,000 family physicians to explore diagnosis, treatment, and referral practices related to chronic cough management in adults in primary care. Respondents completed the survey via paper or online. The outcome measures were self-reported numeric ratings and responses related to the survey elements.Results588 surveys were completed (11.8% response rate). About half (49.6%) of respondents defined chronic cough in a manner consistent with the American College of Chest Physicians (ACCP) chronic cough guidelines, with the rest differing in opinion primarily regarding duration of symptom presentation. Respondents reported trying to rule out most common causes of chronic cough themselves before referring (mean 3.41 on a 4-point scale where 4 is “describes me completely”) and indicated a desire for more resources to help them manage and treat chronic cough. Years in practice and rural/urban setting influenced diagnosis and referral practices.ConclusionsFamily physicians see chronic cough as a complicated condition that can be and is often diagnosed and treated entirely in a primary care setting. They also value the ability to refer in complex cases. Our results support that family physicians provide evidence-based management of chronic cough.