Docetaxel Chemotherapy Regimen Research Articles

Ganoderma spore lipid ameliorates docetaxel, cisplatin, and 5-fluorouracil chemotherapy-induced damage to bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells and hematopoiesis

BackgroundA triplet chemotherapy regimen of docetaxel, cisplatin, and 5-fluorouracil (TPF) is used to treat head and neck squamous cell carcinoma; however, it is toxic to bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells (BMSCs). We previously demonstrated that Ganoderma spore lipid (GSL) protect BMSCs against cyclophosphamide toxicity. In this study, we investigated the protective effects of GSL against TPF-induced BMSCs and hematopoietic damage.MethodsBMSCs and C57BL/6 mice were divided into control, TPF, co-treatment (simultaneously treated with GSL and TPF for 2 days), and pre-treatment (treated with GSL for 7 days before 2 days of TPF treatment) groups. In vitro, morphology, phenotype, proliferation, senescence, apoptosis, reactive oxygen species (ROS), and differentiation of BMSCs were evaluated. In vivo, peripheral platelets (PLTs) and white blood cells (WBCs) from mouse venous blood were quantified. Bone marrow cells were isolated for hematopoietic colony-forming examination.ResultsIn vitro, GSL significantly alleviated TPF-induced damage to BMSCs compared with the TPF group, recovering their morphology, phenotype, proliferation, and differentiation capacity (p < 0.05). Annexin V/PI and senescence-associated β-galactosidase staining showed that GSL inhibited apoptosis and delayed senescence in TPF-treated BMSCs (p < 0.05). GSL downregulated the expression of caspase-3 and reduced ROS formation (p < 0.05). In vivo, GSL restored the number of peripheral PLTs and WBCs and protected the colony-forming capacity of bone marrow cells (p < 0.05).ConclusionsGSL efficiently protected BMSCs from damage caused by TPF and recovered hematopoiesis.

221O Induction chemotherapy regimen of docetaxel plus cisplatin vs docetaxel, cisplatin plus fluorouracil followed by concurrent chemoradiotherapy in locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma: Preliminary results of a phase III multicenter randomized controlled trial

Induction chemotherapy regimens of docetaxel and cisplatin plus fluorouracil (TPF) are currently clinically used for patients with locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (LA-NPC) but have well-known side effects, such as myelosuppression and diarrhea. A docetaxel plus cisplatin (TP) regimen was developed to decrease the toxic effects induced by fluorouracil. In this trial, we assessed whether the TP induction chemotherapy regimen was noninferior to the TPF regimen.

Induction chemotherapy regimen of docetaxel plus cisplatin versus docetaxel, cisplatin plus fluorouracil followed by concurrent chemoradiotherapy in locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma: Preliminary results of an open-label, noninferiority, multicentre, randomised, controlled phase 3 trial.

SummaryBackgroundInduction chemotherapy regimens of docetaxel and cisplatin plus fluorouracil (TPF) are currently clinically used for patients with locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (LA-NPC) but have well-known side effects, such as myelosuppression and diarrhea. A docetaxel plus cisplatin (TP) regimen was developed to decrease the toxic effects induced by fluorouracil. In this trial, we assessed whether the TP induction chemotherapy regimen was noninferior to the TPF regimen.MethodsWe performed an open-label, noninferiority, phase 3, multicentre, randomised, controlled trial at six centres in China. Eligible patients with NPC (stage III-IVA (excluding T3-4N0), Karnofsky's Performance Scoring ≥70) were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive either TP (docetaxel (75 mg per square meter, d1, intravenous infusion) and cisplatin (75 mg per square meter of body-surface area, d1, intravenous infusion)) or TPF (docetaxel (60 mg per square meter, d1, intravenous infusion) plus cisplatin (60 mg per square meter, d1, intravenous infusion) and 5-fluorouracil (600 mg per square meter, d1-d5, intravenous 120-hour infusion)) administered every 3 weeks for 3 cycles followed by concurrent chemoradiotherapy. The primary endpoint was failure-free survival at 2 years. Secondary endpoints included overall survival, safety, and treatment compliance. The trial was stopped early because of strong evidence for noninferiority (margin was -10%) of TP in failure-free survival. Efficacy analyses were performed in both the intention-to-treat and per-protocol trial populations and we included the patients who started treatment in each group for the safety analysis. The study was registered with chictr.org.cn, ChiCTR1800016337.FindingsBetween June 1, 2018 and October 31, 2021, we randomly assigned 361 patients to the TP (n = 181) or TPF (n = 180) induction chemotherapy group. The 2-year failure-free survival was 91·3% (95% CI 86·2-96·4) in the TP group and 82·4% (84·8-88·9) in the TPF group (P = 0·029). Patients in the TPF group had a higher frequency of grade 1 or 2 neutropenia (53 (30·0%) vs. 28 (15·7%); P = 0·0010), grade 1 or 2 diarrhea (20 (11·3%) vs. 9 (5·1%); P = 0·032), and grade 3 or 4 neutropenia (43 (24·3%) vs. 25 (14·0%); P = 0·014) in the induction chemotherapy period. There was no treatment-related death.InterpretationThe preliminary results revealed that TP induction chemotherapy regimen was found to be clearly non-inferior compared to the TPF regimen in failure-free survival, with a lower frequency of neutropenia, anaemia and diarrhoea. The more convenient and beneficial survival regimen of the TP regimen should be recommended in patients with LA-NPC.FundingThis study was supported by grants from the Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province, China [grant number 2021A1515011182], Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province, China [grant number 2022A1515012272], National Natural Science Foundation of China [grant number 82072029] and National Natural Science Foundation of China [grant number 81903037].

A Prospective Study to Evaluate the Efficacy of the Fluorouracil, Leucovorin, Oxaliplatin, and Docetaxel Chemotherapy Regimen in Patients with Locally Advanced and Metastatic Adenocarcinoma of Stomach

Abstract Introduction In India, patients with gastric cancer present at an advanced stage, and there is no standard chemotherapy regimen. Al-Batran's fluorouracil, leucovorin, oxaliplatin, and docetaxel (FLOT) chemotherapy gave us a glimmer of hope. Objectives Hence, we intended to evaluate the efficacy of FLOT chemotherapy in locally advanced and metastatic adenocarcinoma of stomach. Materials and Methods In this single-center, prospective cohort, patients with locally advanced and metastatic gastric adenocarcinoma who required chemotherapy between March 2016 and November 2017 were included in the study. All patients received standard FLOT chemotherapy. The primary objective was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of FLOT chemotherapy in the Indian population. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were calculated through the plotted Kaplan–Meier curves. Results In our study, 28 patients received FLOT chemotherapy. Their mean age was 55 years (range, 28–70 years) with a male preponderance (89.3%). Twenty-five patients had metastatic disease (89.3%), and three had locally advanced disease (10.7%). The median number of cycles was 4.5 (range, 1–8), and 75% received at least four cycles (n = 21). The hematological toxicities exhibited were neutropenia (50%) and febrile neutropenia (35.7%). Sixteen (57.1%) patients needed dose modifications due to treatment-related adverse effects (AEs). AEs led to treatment discontinuation in seven (25%) patients after the first cycle. The overall response rate in the intent-to-treat population was 52.7%, with the best-obtained response being a partial response, median PFS of 5 months, and median OS of 13 months. Conclusion FLOT chemotherapy regimens induced excellent responses but with significantly increased toxicity, needing dose modifications, and hence, should be considered only in a young and fit patient.

Efficacy and safety of Androgen Deprivation Therapy (ADT) combined with modified docetaxel chemotherapy versus ADT combined with standard docetaxel chemotherapy in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: study protocol for a multicentre prospective randomized controlled trial

BackgroundAndrogen deprivation therapy (ADT) combined with docetaxel chemotherapy is the standard treatment for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) patients. However, mCRPC patients are mainly frail elderly men, constantly accompanied by comorbidities and showing poor tolerance to standard docetaxel chemotherapy. Some exploratory studies administering modified chemotherapy regimens have reported noninferior oncologic outcomes with fewer adverse events, yet most are retrospective or small studies, and prospective randomized controlled trials have rarely been conducted. Therefore, we designed this modified docetaxel chemotherapy regimen in patients with mCRPC, aiming to evaluate its efficacy and safety compared with the standard docetaxel chemotherapy regimen.MethodsThis is an open-label, multi-institutional, prospective, randomized non-inferiority trial. A total of 128 patients with mCRPC will be randomized to receive ADT combined with modified docetaxel chemotherapy (experimental group, n=64) or ADT combined with standard docetaxel chemotherapy (control group, n=64). Patients in the experimental group will receive a modified regimen with docetaxel 40 mg/m2 on the 1st day and 35 mg/m2 on the 8th day, repeated every 21 days. The primary endpoint is progression-free survival at 2 years. Secondary endpoints include overall survival, prostate-specific antigen response rate, pain response rate, toxicity and quality of life.DiscussionThe expected benefit for the patient in the experimental arm is noninferior efficacy with decreased toxicity and improved quality of life compared with that in the control arm. To the best of our knowledge, this will be the first multicentre prospective randomized study to assess the efficacy and safety of modified docetaxel chemotherapy in patients with mCRPC in China. The results of this trial may provide benefit to mCRPC patients, especially those with poor performance.Trial registrationchictr.org.cn Identifier: ChiCTR2100046636 (May 24, 2021). Ongoing study.

Safety and Efficacy of Anti-PD-1/PD-L1 Inhibitors Compared With Docetaxel for NSCLC: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of anti-PD-1/PD-L1 Inhibitors versus docetaxel for non-small cell lung cancer by meta-analysis.Methods: Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) about anti-PD-1/PD-L1 Inhibitors versus docetaxel on the treatment of NSCLC were searched in CNKI, WF, VIP, PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases. Two reviewers independently screened literature, extracted data and evaluated the risk of bias of eligible studies. Meta-analysis was performed by RevMan5.3 software.Results: Compared with the use of docetaxel chemotherapy for NSCLC, the overall survival and progression-free survival of the anti-PD-1/PD-L1 Inhibitors regimen are better [overall survival: (HR= 0.73, 95%CI:0.69∼0.77, P<0.00001], progression-free survival: (HR= 0.89, 95%CI:0.83∼0.94, P<0.00001]), and lower incidence of treatment-related grade 3 or higher adverse events ([OR=0.20, 95% CI: 0.13∼0.31, P<0.00001]).Conclusion: Compared with the docetaxel chemotherapy regimen, the anti-PD-1/PD-L1 Inhibitors has certain advantages in terms of efficacy and safety. The results still need to be confirmed by a multi-center, large sample, and high-quality research.

Amenorrhea in women with breast cancer who received chemotherapy: a case report

Introduction: Breast cancer is the second most common cancer in premenopause age, has a better outcome now. Increasing early detection rates and the effectiveness of adjuvant chemotherapy treatments are factors that influence the prognosis dan survival rate. However, adjuvant chemotherapy treatment can lead to ovarian dysfunction resulting in decreased quality of life.Case: A-29-year-old woman with breast cancer received a chemotherapy regimen of Docetaxel, Doxorubicin, and Cyclophosphamide for six cycles and had no menstrual bleeding (amenorrhoea) after chemotherapy finished. Physical examination, gynecology, and ultrasound showed no abnormalities. However, the Anti-Mullerian Hormone (AMH) immunoserology laboratory test showed shallow results.Conclusion: The gonad toxicity effects of chemotherapy on breast cancer can cause premature ovarian failure, which can manifest as oligomenorrhea, amenorrhea, or known as chemotherapy-induced amenorrhea (CIA), which can lead to induction of premature menopause or chemotherapy-induced menopause (CIM).

Adding carboplatin to chemotherapy regimens for metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer in postsecond generation hormone therapy setting: Impact on treatment response and survival outcomes.

The clinical course in metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) can be complicated when patients have disease progression after prior treatment with second generation hormone therapy (second HT), such as enzalutamide or abiraterone. Currently, limited data exist regarding the optimal choice of chemotherapy for mCRPC after failing second generation hormone therapy. We sought to evaluate three common chemotherapy regimens in this setting. We retrospectively identified 150 mCRPC patients with disease progression on enzalutamide or abiraterone. Of these 150 patients, 92 patients were chemo-naïve while 58 patients had previously received docetaxel chemotherapy before being started on second HT. After failing second HT, 90 patients were assigned for docetaxel-alone (group A), 33 patients received carboplatin plus docetaxel (group B), while 27 patients received cabazitaxel-alone (Group C). A favorable response was defined by more than or equal to 50% reduction in prostate-specific antigen from the baseline level after a complete course of chemotherapy. Survival outcomes were assessed for 30-month overall survival. Patients in group (B) were 2.6 times as likely to have a favorable response compared to patients in group (A) (OR = 2.625, 95%CI: 1.15-5.99) and almost three times compared to patients in group (C) (OR = 2.975, 95%CI: 1.04-8.54) (P = .0442). 30-month overall survival was 70.7%, 38.9% and 30.3% for group (B), (A), and (C), respectively (P = .008). We report a Hazard Ratio of 3.1 (95% CI, 1.31-7.35; P = .0037) between patients in group (A) versus those in group (B) and a Hazard Ratio of 4.18 (95% CI, 1.58-11.06; P = .0037) between patients in group (C) compared to those in group (B) CONCLUSION: This data demonstrates improved response and overall survival in treatment-refractory mCRPC with a chemotherapy regimen of docetaxel plus carboplatin when compared to docetaxel alone or cabazitaxel alone. Further investigations are required.

The Effect of Time to Castration Resistance on Overall Survival and Success of Docetaxel Treatment in Castration Resistant Prostate Cancer Patients.

To investigate the prognostic role of time to castration resistance(TTCR) in patients who have received solely Docetaxel chemotherapy regimen(DCR) for castration resistant prostate cancer(CRPC). Between Jan 2004 and Dec 2015, data of 162 patients who have received DCR for CRPC were gath-ered. Patients were divided into three groups according to TTCR: Group 1(? 12 months), group 2(13-24 months), and group 3(>24 months). Data of age, clinical stage, Gleason grade(GG), previous treatments, site of metastases, Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) values, TTCR, overall survival, biochemical progression free survival(PFS) and PSA response to docetaxel were recorded. The mean age of the 162 patients was 74.4 ± 8.5 years. Data on mean age, type of castration, adding estra-mustine to docetaxel, secondary hormonal manipulation, Gleason grade, clinical T stage at initial diagnosis and site of metastases were comparable between three groups. PSA values were higher in group 1 than other groups. PSA response to docetaxel was 59.2% in all patient and it was worse in group 1 than other groups (P = .009). Two years overall survival rates were 7.6%, 25% and 32.3% in group 1, 2 and 3, respectively. Median survival rates were 7, 14 and 23 months in group 1, 2 and 3, respectively, and this difference was statistically significant (P=.016). On multivariate analysis, TTCR was found to be independent prognostic factor for overall survival and response to docetaxel treatment. TTCR appears to be an independent prognostic factor for patients who are candidates for DCR.

The Role of Immunotherapy and Radiation Therapy in Tumor Chemosensitivity in Advanced Head and Neck Cancer

Patient: Male, 56Final Diagnosis: Advanced stage squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neckSymptoms: Rapidly enlarging mass in left neckMedication: —Clinical Procedure: —Specialty: OncologyObjective:Unusual clinical courseBackground:Cancer is the second leading cause of death internationally, resulting in millions of deaths each year. While treatment in the past has heavily relied on surgery and radiotherapy, chemotherapy and immunotherapy are being increasingly utilized depending on disease presentation.Case Report:A 56-year-old male presented to the Emergency Department with a 3-week history of a rapidly enlarging left supraclavicular neck mass. Computed tomography scan revealed a 12×13 cm mass extending from the angle of the mandible to the supraclavicular area. A biopsy confirmed advanced stage squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. The patient was started on a chemotherapy regimen of docetaxel, cisplatin, and 5-fluorouracil (TCF). The tumor progressed through chemotherapy, which was switched to cetuximab; however, this therapy was discontinued after an anaphylactic reaction. Palliative radiation treatment was begun along with pembrolizumab. Pembrolizumab was continued, and after 9 cycles, the patient’s cancer was almost in complete remission. Three months later, disease progression was once again noted with pembrolizumab treatment, which was subsequently discontinued. The patient was started on paclitaxel and carboplatin chemotherapy regimen as a last resort, despite failure of prior TCF treatment, and the patient responded, this time with complete remission in 4 months.Conclusions:This case demonstrates a unique outcome in which a patient who previously was resistant to chemotherapy, later responded to chemotherapy after a trial of radiation therapy and immunotherapy. Immunotherapy may have a synergistic effect with radiation therapy and play a role in tumor sensitivity to chemotherapy in head and neck cancer treatment.

Induction chemotherapy in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma of the paranasal sinus and nasal cavity: a role in organ preservation.

Background/Aims:The role of induction chemotherapy (IC) for eyeball preservation has not been established in head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) of the paranasal sinus and nasal cavity (PNSNC). Periorbital involvement frequently leads to eyeball exenteration with a margin of safety. We evaluated the treatment outcomes, including survival and eyeball preservation, of patients who received IC for HNSCC of the PNSNC.Methods:We reviewed 21 patients diagnosed with HNSCC of the PNSNC who were treated with IC. We analyzed response, eyeball preservation rate, and overall survival.Results:Tumors were located in the paranasal sinus (n = 14) or nasal cavity (n = 7). Most patients had stage T4a (n = 10) or T4b (n = 7) disease. More than half of the patients received a chemotherapy regimen of docetaxel, fluorouracil, and cisplatin (n = 11). Thirteen patients (61.9%) achieved a partial response after IC and 15 patients (71.4%) achieved T down-staging. Among 17 patients with stage T4 disease, which confers a high risk of orbital exenteration, 14 (82.4%) achieved preservation of the involved eye. The 3-year overall survival (OS) rate of patients who achieved a partial response to IC was 84.6%. The 3-year OS rate of patients with stable disease or disease progression after IC was 25.0% (p = 0.038).Conclusions:IC could be considered for down-staging patients with advanced T-stage disease. It could also be a reasonable option for eyeball preservation in locally advanced HNSCC of the PNSNC.

The impact of sustained and intermittent docetaxel chemotherapy regimens on cognition and neural morphology in healthy mice

A subset of cancer survivors demonstrates impairments in cognition long after chemotherapy completion. At present, it is unclear whether these changes are due to direct neurotoxic effects of chemotherapy. This study examined the impact of variable docetaxel (DTX) chemotherapy dosing on brain DTX exposure via analyses of neural morphology and changes in cognition. Male CD-1 mice were treated with DTX either intermittently (8 mg/kg i.p. weekly) or via a sustained delivery system (DTX-PoLigel), which continuously releases DTX. Both groups received total DTX doses of 32 mg/kg. Mice were assessed on the novel object recognition (NOR) task and the Morris water maze (MWM) shortly after treatment. Post-treatment behavioral testing demonstrated impaired NOR in mice treated with either dosing schedule relative to controls. No differences were observed between groups in MWM training and initial testing, though control mice performed better than chance while DTX-treated mice did not. Appreciable amounts of DTX were found in the brain after both treatment regimens. DTX treatment did not significantly increase levels of apoptosis within the CNS. However, some elevation in neural autophagy was observed following DTX treatment. Analysis of astrocytic activation demonstrated that intermittent DTX treatment resulted in an elevation of GFAP-positive astrocytes for 48 h after administration. Sustained chemotherapy demonstrated prolonged but lower levels of astrocyte activation over 9 days following implantation. DTX treatment induced cognitive impairment shortly after treatment. Further, these findings suggest an association between DTX dosing, neurotoxicity, and cognitive effects.

Docetaxel, Cisplatin and Fluorouracil (DCF) Regimen Compared with Non-Taxane-Containing Palliative Chemotherapy for Gastric Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BackgroundGastric carcinoma (GC) is one of the highest cancer-mortality diseases with a high incidence rate in Asia. For surgically unfit but medically fit patients, palliative chemotherapy is the main treatment. The chemotherapy regimen of docetaxel, cisplatin and 5-fluorouracil (DCF) has been used to treat the advanced stage or metastatic GC. It is necessary to compare effectiveness and toxicities of DCF regimen with non-taxane-containing palliative chemotherapy for GC.MethodsPubMed, EmBase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and China National Knowledge Infrastructure databases were searched to select relative randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing DCF to non-taxane-containing chemotherapy for patients with palliatively resected, unresectable, recurrent or metastatic GC. Primary outcome measures were 1-year and 2-year overall survival (OS) rates. Secondary outcome measures were median survival time (MST), median time to progression (TTP), response rate and toxicities.ResultsTwelve RCTs were eligible and 1089 patients were analyzed totally (549 in DCF and 540 in control). DCF regimen increased partial response rate (38.8% vs 27.9%, p = 0.0003) and reduced progressive disease rate (18.9% vs 33.3%, p = 0.0005) compared to control regimen. Significant improvement of 2-year OS rate was found in DCF regimen (RR = 2.03, p = 0.006), but not of 1-year OS rate (RR = 1.22, p = 0.08). MST was significantly prolonged by DCF regimen (p = 0.039), but not median TTP (p = 0.054). Both 1-year OS rate and median TTP had a trend of prolongation by DCF regimen. Chemotherapy-related mortality was comparable (RR = 1.23, p = 0.49) in both regimens. In grade I-IV toxicities, DCF regimen showed a major raise of febrile neutropenia (RR = 2.33, p<0.0001) and minor raises of leucopenia (RR = 1.25, p<0.00001), neutropenia (RR = 1.19, p<0.00001), and diarrhea (RR = 1.59, p<0.00001), while in other toxicities there were no significant differences.ConclusionDCF regimen has better response than non-taxane containing regimen and could potentially improve the survival outcomes. The chemotherapy-related toxicity of DCF regimen is acceptable to some extent.

A Phase II Study of Concurrent Docetaxel, Epirubicin and Cyclophosphamide as a Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Regimen in Patients with Locally Advanced Breast Cancer

Background: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy with concurrent docetaxel, doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide is commonly used for patients with locally advanced breast cancer. Epirubicin is another anthracycline used in breast cancer but the concurrent use of epirubicin and taxane is not well-established. We conducted a single institution, phase II study to assess the efficacy and safety of concurrent docetaxel, epirubicin and cyclophosphamide (TEC) as a neoadjuvant chemotherapy regimen in breast cancer. Methods: Patients with newly diagnosed locally advanced breast cancer defined as T2 >3 cm, T3, T4 with any N, or any T with N1-3 were eligible. A chemotherapy regimen of docetaxel 75mg/m2, epirubicin 75mg/m2 and cyclophosphamide 600mg/m2 was given with filgrastim support every 3 weeks for 6 cycles. The primary end-point was pathologic complete response rate. Results: Twenty patients were enrolled from 2003 to 2006. The median age was 51 (29-70) year-old. Eight patients were premenopausal. Ten patients had positive hormone receptors. Four patients had HER2 positive receptor. Nineteen patients completed six cycles of TEC chemotherapy. The pathologic complete response rate was 25%. Eight of sixteen patients with N1-3 disease had pathological negative lymph nodes. With a median follow up of 57.5 (16-71) months, four patients relapsed including one death from recurrence. The estimated 5 year relapse-free survival was 79.3% and the 5-year overall survival was 94.7%. No patient had cardiac failure or death during treatment. The most common grade 3-4 toxicity was neutropenia (35%). Conclusion: TEC regimen is a well- tolerated and effective neoadjuvant chemotherapy regimen for locally advanced breast cancer that results in a pathologic complete response rate of 25%.

Efficacy and safety of docetaxel combined with oxaliplatin in treatment of patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer

Objective:To observe the efficacy and safety of combined treatment with docetaxel and oxaliplatin in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer(NSCLC).Methods: Sixty patients with advanced NSCLC were randomly divided into treatment group and control group of 30 patients each.The patients in treatment group were intravenously given 75 mg/m2 docetaxel and 150 mg/m2 oxaliplatin on the first day,while the patients in control group were given 75 mg/m2 docetaxel and 80 mg/m2 cisplatin.One treatment course lasted 4 weeks and the patients received 2-3 courses.Results: In treatment group,complete remission(CR) was found in 1 case,partial remission(PR) in 14 cases,stable disease(SD) in 11 cases and progression of disease(PD) in 4 cases.In control group,PR was found in 11 cases,SD in 11 cases and PD in 8 cases.The effective rate(CR+PR) in treatment group was significantly higher than that in control group(50.0% vs 36.7%,P0.05).The Karnofsky performance score(KPS) in treatment group was higher than that in control group(P0.05),but there was no significant difference in the median progression time and 1-year survival rate between the two groups.The main adverse drug reactions(ADRs) in two groups were leucopenia,gastrointestinal reactions and hepatic dysfunction.The incidence of ADRs in treatment group was lower than that in control group(P0.05).The ADRs could be tolerated by most of the patients.Conclusion: The combined chemotherapy regimen of docetaxel and oxaliplatin has good efficacy and tolerable ADRs in patients with advanced NSCLC.It can improve the quality of life for the patients.

Carboplatin and docetaxel-induced acute pancreatitis: brief report

A 60-year-old Caucasian female presented with stage IIA (T2N0M0) estrogen- and progesterone-negative and HER2-positive breast cancer. She was started on an adjuvant chemotherapy regimen of docetaxel, carboplatin, and trastuzumab (TCH). She tolerated the first two cycles of the TCH regimen well. However, 3-4 days after the third and fourth cycles, she developed acute pancreatitis. Elevated pancreatic enzymes and abdominal computed tomography (CT) imaging findings confirmed the diagnosis of acute pancreatitis. Common causes of pancreatitis were ruled out. Given the time course it was assumed that the chemotherapy was the cause of pancreatitis in our patient. The patient did not receive any further docetaxel and carboplatin chemotherapy but continued on adjuvant trastuzumab alone for a planned duration of 1 year without any recurrence of acute pancreatitis.

Phase II study of combined docetaxel, epirubicin, and cyclophosphamide as a neoadjuvant chemotherapy regimen in patients with locally advanced breast cancer in a single institution.

e11040 Background: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy with anthracycline and taxane combinations is a standard approach for locally advanced breast cancer. One commonly used regimen is docetaxel, doxorubicin and cyclophosphamide. Epirubicin is another anthracycline used in breast cancer but the combined use of epirubicin and taxane is not well established. We conducted a single institution, phase II study to assess the efficacy of combined docetaxel, epirubicin and cyclophosphamide (TEC) as a neoadjuvant chemotherapy regimen. Methods: Eligible patients were female with newly diagnosed locally advanced breast cancer defined as T2 > 3 cm, T3-4, any N, or any T, N1-3, M0. A chemotherapy regimen of docetaxel 75 mg/m2, epirubicin 75 mg/m2 and cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m2 was given with growth factor support every 3 weeks for 6 cycles. All patients had surgery within 3-6 weeks after completion of chemotherapy. Primary end-point was pathologic complete response (pCR). Results: Twenty-one patients were registered from December 2003 to December 2006. One patient was excluded because of history of thyroid cancer. Median age was 51 (29-70). Eight patients (40%) were premenopausal. Ten patients (50%) had negative tumor hormone receptors. Four patients (20%) who had HER2/neu overexpression received adjuvant trastuzumab. All but one patient completed 6 cycles of TEC chemotherapy. One patient refused to receive the last cycle of chemotherapy. Fourteen patients (70%) had lumpectomy and 6 patients (30%) underwent mastectomy. The pCR rate was 25%. Eight of 16 patients with N1-3 disease (50%) had pathological negative lymph nodes. With a median follow up of 57.5 (16-71) months, 4 patients (20%) relapsed with 1 died from recurrence. The estimated 5-year relapse free survival is 79%. No patient had cardiac failure or death during treatment. The most common grade 3-4 toxicity was neutropenia (35%). Conclusions: Combined TEC regimen is a feasible, well-tolerated and effective neoadjuvant chemotherapy regimen for locally advanced breast cancer that results in a pCR rate of 25%. No significant financial relationships to disclose.