Chemotherapy-refractory Ovarian Cancer Research Articles

Nationwide Trends and Determinants of Germline BRCA1/2 Testing in Patients With Breast and Ovarian Cancer.

Germline genetic testing (GT) for BRCA1/2 is instrumental in identifying patients with breast and ovarian cancers who are eligible for PARP inhibitors (PARPi). Little is known about recent trends and determinants of GT since PARPi were approved for these patients. We performed a retrospective cohort study of patients in a nationwide electronic health record (EHR)-derived oncology-specific database with the following GT eligibility criteria: breast cancer diagnosed at age ≤45 years, triple-negative breast cancer diagnosed at age ≤60 years, male breast cancer, or ovarian cancer. GT within 1 year of diagnosis was assessed and stratified by tumor type. Multivariable log-binomial regressions estimated adjusted relative risks (RRs) of GT by patient and tumor characteristics. Among 2,982 eligible patients with breast cancer, 56.4% underwent GT between January 2011 and March 2020, with a significant increase in GT over time (RR, 1.08; 95% CI, 1.05-1.11, for each year), independent of when PARPi were approved for BRCA1/2-mutated metastatic breast cancer in January 2018. In multivariable analyses, older age (RR, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.90-0.96, for every 5 years) and Medicare coverage (RR, 0.69; 95% CI, 0.49-0.96 vs commercial insurance) were associated with less GT. Among 5,563 eligible patients with ovarian cancer, 35.4% underwent GT between January 2011 and March 2020, with a significant increase in GT over time (RR, 1.11; 95% CI, 1.07-1.14, for each year) that accelerated after approval of PARPi for BRCA1/2-mutated, chemotherapy-refractory ovarian cancer in December 2014 (RR, 1.42; 95% CI, 1.19-1.70). Older age (RR, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.93-0.97, for every 5 years) and Black or African American race (RR, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.65-0.98 vs White race) were associated with less GT. GT remains underutilized nationwide among patients with breast and ovarian cancers. Although GT has increased over time, significant disparities by age, race, and insurance status persist. Additional work is needed to design, implement, and evaluate strategies to ensure that all eligible patients receive GT.

Actin-like Protein 6A Expression Correlates with Cancer Stem Cell-like Features and Poor Prognosis in Ovarian Cancer.

Ovarian cancer has the highest mortality rate among gynecological cancers, often diagnosed at the late stage and lacking an effective targeted therapy. Although the study of malignant features of cancer, considered to be cancer stem cells (CSCs), is emerging, the aim of this study was to predict and explore the possible mechanism and clinical value of genetic markers in the development of ovarian cancer from a combined database with CSCs features. The common differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were selected in GSE185833 and GSE176246 datasets from the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO). The GSE185833 dataset was created to reveal gene expression profiles of peritoneal metastasis tissues using single-cell sequencing, and the GSE176246 dataset was determined from gene expression profiles of chemotherapy-refractory ovarian cancer cell lines compared with ovarian cancer cell lines by RNA-seq analysis. By analyzing the correlation between common DEGs and prognosis of ovarian cancer and its possible pathways and functions were predicted by The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database. The expression levels of 11 genetic markers were significantly elevated in highly invasive and chemoresistant ovarian cancer. The expression of Actin-like protein 6A (ACTL6A) was found to be correlated with survival prognosis, and the total survival time of the patients with high expression of ACTL6A was shorter than those with low expression. Gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA) showed that ACTL6A positively enriched the gene set of 'Cell cycle' and ACTL6A negatively enriched the gene set of focal adhesion. CP724714, a human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) inhibitor, could serve as a therapeutic option when ACTL6A levels are high in ovarian cancer cells. The high expression of ACTL6A is a poor prognostic factor in ovarian cancer and may serve as an effective biomarker for predicting treatment-refractory, metastasis, and prognosis of patients with ovarian cancer. The use of HER2 inhibitors is a promising therapeutic strategy against chemoresistant ovarian cancer.

Chimeric oncolytic Ad5/3 virus replicates and lyses ovarian cancer cells through desmoglein-2 cell entry receptor.

Despite new therapies, the estimated 229 875 women living with ovarian cancer have a 5‐year survival rate of 47.6%. This cavity‐localized cancer lends itself to local administration of modalities, such as the oncolytic adenovirus (Ad) Ad5/3‐D24‐granulocyte‐macrophage colony‐stimulating factor virus (ONCOS‐102). Its repeated administration to a patient with chemotherapy‐refractory ovarian cancer induced CD8+ antitumor immune responses with the overall survival reaching 40 months. Here we probe the dominant receptor used by ONCOS‐102 in four established epithelial ovarian cancer cell lines. Ad3 can use the desmoglein‐2 (DSG2) and CD46 receptors on susceptible cells. DSG2 was nearly absent in A2780 cells but was expressed in more than 90% of OAW42, OVCAR3, and OV‐90 cells. After 96 hours, ONCOS‐102 treatment showed significant oncolytic activity (≧50%) in OAW42, OVCAR3, and OV‐90 cells, but minimal activity in A2780 cells, suggesting DSG2 as the dominant receptor for ONCOS‐102. Furthermore, retrospective analyses of phase I clinical trial of ONCOS‐102 treatment of 12 patients with varied tumors indicated a correlation between viral genomes in blood and DSG2 RNA expression. These data support the role of DSG2 expression on cancer cells in virus infectivity and the continued development of ONCOS‐102 for ovarian cancer treatment.

Delta tocotrienol in recurrent ovarian cancer. A phase II trial

Delta tocotrienol has anti-neoplastic activity as demonstrated in several in-vitro and in-vivo investigations. The effect relies on inhibition of different pathways. It also has antiangiogenic activity, and an additive effect to bevacizumab may be expected.The present study was a phase II trial of bevacizumab combined with tocotrienol in chemotherapy refractory ovarian cancer. The study also included analysis of circulating tumor specific HOXA9 methylated DNA (HOXA9 meth-ctDNA) during treatment.The study included 23 patients. The rate of disease stabilization was 70% with very low toxicity. The median PFS was 6.9 months and the median OS 10.9 months, which is rather high compared to the current literature. A division of the patients according to level of HOXA9 meth-ctDNA already after the first cycle of chemotherapy resulted in two groups of patients with different prognoses. Patients with an increasing level of HOXA9 meth-ctDNA had a median PFS and OS of 1.4 and 4.3 months, respectively, compared to 7.8 and 12 months in the group with stable or decreasing levels.The combination of bevacizumab and tocotrienol is potent in chemotherapy refractory ovarian cancer. The level of HOXA9 meth-ctDNA after one cycle of chemotherapy holds important prognostic information.

Catumaxomab treatment of malignant ascites in patients with chemotherapy-refractory ovarian cancer: A phase II study.

5048 Background: Malignant ascites (MA) in ovarian carcinoma (OC) patients (pts) is associated with a poor prognosis and reduced quality of life due to symptoms from ascites. In 2009, catumaxomab was approved in the EU for the intraperitoneal (IP) treatment of MA. Methods: In this single-arm, open-label, US, multicenter, phase II study, 32 chemotherapy-refractory and heavily pretreated (median of 4.5 prior chemotherapies) OC pts with MA were treated with catumaxomab. Pts received 4 IP infusions (10, 20, 50, and 150 µg) over 3 hours on days 0, 3, 7, and 10. The primary endpoint was the proportion of pts with at least a 4-fold increase in the puncture-free interval (PuFI) relative to their pretreatment interval. Main secondary endpoints were puncture-free survival (PuFS), overall survival (OS), MA symptoms based on patient-assessed FACIT-AI scores, safety, and tolerability. Results: 22.6% pts achieved at least a 4-fold increase in the PFI after catumaxomab treatment, which was below the predefined threshold...

Phase I dose-escalation study of ON 01910.Na in combination with oxaliplatin in patients with advanced solid tumors.

e13133 Background: ON 01910.Na is a new multikinase inhibitor, which induces mitotic catastrophe and apoptosis in cancer but not in normal cells. Multiple pathways are involved including polo-like kinase. Cell killing effects are exposure time-dependent in vitro. In addition, a combination of ON 01910.Na with oxaliplatin produced significant synergy in effect, prompting phase I evaluation in humans. Methods: Patients with advanced cancer received a starting dose of ON 01910.Na 250mg/m2 as a 24hr continuous infusion (CI) repeated weekly. Oxaliplatin was administered biweekly as 85mg/m2, 2 hr infusion. The ON 01910.Na dose cohorts ranged from 250-1350 mg/m2 based on a modified Fibonacci escalation algorithm using the accelerated titration scheme (NCI). Intrapatient dose escalation was allowed. Pharmacokinetic (PK) sampling is to be performed at the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) level. Results: 13 patients (pts) (all females; ages: 38-71 yrs) have received combination therapy. At the highest dose (1350 mg/m2), 2 pts have received 6 weeks of continuous therapy. The overall mean (range) number of weeks of continuous therapy delivered was 11.1 (3-42). Grade 2 toxicities (2-grade increase in toxicity) include anorexia (1 pt), nausea (2 pt), fatigue (1 pt), peripheral sensory neuropathy (1 pt), abdominal cramps (1 pt), neutropenia (1 pt) and vomiting (2 pt). Partial response was observed in 1 pt with chemotherapy- refractory ovarian cancer (26 wk, prior progressions on paclitaxel+carboplatin [carbo], topotecan+docetaxel, carbo+gemcitabine, doxorubicin hydrochloride liposome, paclitaxel+bevacizumab, and etoposide). Stable disease was observed in a pt with colon cancer (42 wk, prior progressions on FOLFOX-4 and FOLFIRI+bevacizumab), and in a pt with ovarian cancer (19 wk, prior progressions on carbo+paclitaxel, doxorubicin hydrochloride liposome, gemcitabine+carbo, topotecan, vinorelbine, and bevacizumab+paclitaxel). Conclusions: It is feasible to administer ON 01910.Na as a 24hr infusion in combination with oxaliplatin. Tumor response was seen in chemotherapy-refractory ovarian cancer. The toxicities are tolerable and dose escalation continues. Further analysis of response and toxicity as well as PK at the MTD dose level is planned as this study continues to enroll patients. Author Disclosure Employment or Leadership Position Consultant or Advisory Role Stock Ownership Honoraria Research Funding Expert Testimony Other Remuneration Onconova Therapeutics, Inc. Onconova Therapeutics, Inc. Onconova Therapeutics, Inc.

Phase II trial of the oral PARP inhibitor olaparib (AZD2281) in BRCA-deficient advanced ovarian cancer

5500 Background: Olaparib (AZD2281; KU-0059436) is a novel, orally active PARP inhibitor that induces synthetic lethality in homozygous BRCA-deficient cells. A phase I trial identified 400 mg bd as the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) with an initial signal of efficacy in BRCA-deficient cancers (ASCO 2008; abst 5510). The primary aim of this study was to test the efficacy of olaparib in confirmed BRCA1/BRCA2 carriers with advanced chemotherapy-refractory ovarian cancer. The secondary aim was to assess the safety and tolerability profile in ovarian cancer patients with BRCA1/2 deficiency. Methods: In an international, multicenter, proof-of-concept, single-arm, phase II study, two patient (pt) sequential cohorts received continuous oral olaparib in 28-day cycles, initially at the MTD, 400 mg bd (33 pts), and subsequently at 100 mg bd (24 pts), a previously shown clinically active and PARP inhibitory dose. Eligibility criteria included confirmed genetic BRCA1/2 mutation and recurrent, measurable, incurable disease (previous chemotherapy, median 3 lines). The primary efficacy endpoint was best objective response rate (ORR; RECIST) post baseline. Change in CA125 was a secondary efficacy endpoint. All adverse events were reported using CTCAE v3. Results: At this interim analysis dated October 31, 2008, of 57 enrolled pts (39 BRCA1 deficient and 18 BRCA2 deficient), 33 were evaluable at 400 mg bd and 24 at 100 mg bd. The confirmed RECIST ORR was 33% at 400 mg bd and 12.5% at 100 mg bd. Clinical benefit rate (ORR and/or confirmed >50% decline in CA125) was 57.6% at 400 mg bd and 16.7% at 100 mg bd. Toxicity was mainly mild in severity, reflecting grade 1/2 nausea (44%); fatigue (35%); and anemia (14%). Grade 3 toxicity occurred infrequently, and comprised primarily nausea (7%) and leukopenia (5%). Conclusions: Oral olaparib is well tolerated and highly active in advanced, chemotherapy-refractory BRCA-deficient ovarian cancer, with greater activity seen at the higher dose. Toxicity in BRCA1/2 carriers was similar to that seen in non-carriers. This study provides positive proof of the concept of the activity and tolerability of genetically defined targeted therapy with olaparib in BRCA-deficient ovarian cancers. [Table: see text]

A Southwest Oncology Group Study on the Use of a Human Tumor Cloning Assay for Predicting Response In Patients With Ovarian Cancer

A total of 211 patients with epithelial ovarian cancer (168 with tumors refractory to prior chemotherapy and 43 with no prior chemotherapy) from 33 different Southwest Oncology Group institutions had their tumors sampled and specimens shipped to two central laboratories for drug-sensitivity testing in a human tumor cloning assay. The 168 patients with a prior history of chemotherapy failure (median of four prior chemotherapeutic agents) were treated with the most effective agent(s) found in the cloning assay (23 patients), and those patients whose tumors did not form colonies in vitro or did not manifest any sensitivity to agent(s) were treated with a clinician's choice of agent(s) (101 patients). The remaining 44 of the 168 patients were not treated with chemotherapy because of deteriorating performance status or early death. The complete and partial response rate in patients treated according to assay results was 28% versus 11% for the patients treated according to clinician's choice (P = 0.03). There was no statistically significant difference in survival between the two options (6.25 versus 7 months, respectively). The 43 patients with no history of prior chemotherapy were all treated with standard combination chemotherapy, and their clinical response was compared with their in vitro sensitivity to the same agents. Overall there was a 100% true-positive rate and 100% true-negative rate for the seven evaluable patients. From these data the authors conclude that use of the human tumor cloning assay may increase the response rate but not the survival for selected patients with advanced chemotherapy-refractory ovarian cancer. The study is weakened, however, by the many steps of patient selection necessitated by inadequate tumor colony formation in vitro and the inability to treat all patients (because of early death or a rapid decline in performance status). The assay does appear to be worthy of additional study for predicting response to combination chemotherapy in patients without a prior history of chemotherapy. Finally the use of central chemosensitivity testing laboratories is feasible for testing in vitro predictive assays in a cooperative group setting.

A southwest oncology group study on the use of a human tumor cloning assay for predicting response in patients with ovarian cancer

A total of 211 patients with epithelial ovarian cancer (168 with tumors refractory to prior chemotherapy and 43 with no prior chemotherapy) from 33 different Southwest Oncology Group institutions had their tumors sampled and specimens shipped to two central laboratories for drug-sensitivity testing in a human tumor cloning assay. The 168 patients with a prior history of chemotherapy failure (median of four prior chemotherapeutic agents) were treated with the most effective agent(s) found in the cloning assay (23 patients), and those patients whose tumors did not form colonies in vitro or did not manifest any sensitivity to agent(s) were treated with a clinician's choice of agent(s) (101 patients). The remaining 44 of the 168 patients were not treated with chemotherapy because of deteriorating performance status or early death. The complete and partial response rate in patients treated according to assay results was 28% versus 11% for the patients treated according to clinician's choice (P = 0.03). There was no statistically significant difference in survival between the two options (6.25 versus 7 months, respectively). The 43 patients with no history of prior chemotherapy were all treated with standard combination chemotherapy, and their clinical response was compared with their in vitro sensitivity to the same agents. Overall there was a 100% true-positive rate and 100% true-negative rate for the seven evaluable patients. From these data the authors conclude that use of the human tumor cloning assay may increase the response rate but not the survival for selected patients with advanced chemotherapy-refractory ovarian cancer. The study is weakened, however, by the many steps of patient selection necessitated by inadequate tumor colony formation in vitro and the inability to treat all patients (because of early death or a rapid decline in performance status). The assay does appear to be worthy of additional study for predicting response to combination chemotherapy in patients without a prior history of chemotherapy. Finally the use of central chemosensitivity testing laboratories is feasible for testing in vitro predictive assays in a cooperative group setting.