Assessment Of Chemotherapy-induced Peripheral Neuropathy Research Articles

Assessment of Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy and its Impact on Health-Related Quality of Life among Various Cancer Patients

Assessment of Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy and its Impact on Health-Related Quality of Life among Various Cancer Patients

Repurposing chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy grading.

Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) is perceived differently by patients and physicians, complicating its assessment. Current recommendations advocate combining clinical and patient-reported outcomes measures, but this approach can be challenging in patient care. This multicenter European study aims to bridge the gap between patients' perceptions and neurological impairments by aligning both perspectives to improve treatment decision-making. Data were pooled from two prospective studies of subjects (n = 372) with established CIPN. Patient and physician views regarding CIPN were assessed using the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE), Total Neuropathy Scale-clinical version (TNSc) items, and the disease-specific quality of life - Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy questionnaire (QLQ-CIPN20) from the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC). To identify inherent neurotoxic severity patterns, we employed hierarchical cluster analysis optimized with k-means clustering and internally validated by discriminant functional analysis. Both NCI-CTCAE and TNSc demonstrated a significant difference in the distribution of severity grades in relation to QLQ-CIPN20 scores. However, a proportion of subjects with different neurotoxic severity grades exhibited overlapping QLQ-CIPN20 scores. We identified three distinct clusters classifying subjects as having severely impaired, intermediately impaired, and mildly impaired CIPN based on TNSc and QLQ-CIPN20 scores. No differences in demographics, cancer type distribution, or class of drug received were observed. Our results confirm the heterogeneity in CIPN perception between patients and physicians and identify three well-differentiated subgroups of patients delineated by degree of CIPN impairment based on scores derived from TNSc and QLQ-CIPN20. A more refined assessment of CIPN could potentially be achieved using the calculator tool derived from the cluster equations in this study. This tool, which facilitates individual patient classification, requires prospective validation.

Knowledge levels of oncology nurses regarding evidence-based practices in the assessment and management of chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy

ObjectiveThe study aimed to determine the level of oncology nurses' knowledge of evidence-based practice for assessing and managing chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN). MethodsThis study employed a descriptive and cross-sectional research design. It was carried out with oncology nurses who were working at a university hospital in the Western Region of Turkey and who were members of the Oncology Nursing Association. The sample of the study consisted of 96 nurses who met the inclusion criteria. ResultsThe study sample comprised 94.8% female oncology nurses, 57.3% of whom held an undergraduate degree, and over half (58.5%) of whom were employed as clinical nurses. A majority of nurses (76.0%) indicated that they had not received any training in peripheral neuropathy. 35.4% of the nurses assessed patients receiving neurotoxic chemotherapy for peripheral neuropathy at each visit/each chemotherapy cycle. A total of 43.8% of nurses indicated that they frequently assessed patients for peripheral neuropathy at the conclusion of the treatment protocol. The oncology nurses assessed the patient-reported symptoms of motor neuropathy (58.3%), sensory neuropathy (56.3%), autonomic neuropathy (51.0%), neuropathic pain (55.2%), and co-occurring symptoms (52.1%) on a frequent basis. The nurses reported that they assessed muscle strength (56.3%), gait and balance (58.3%), and quality of life (52.1%) “frequently”. In contrast, they assessed deep tendon reflex (41.7%), neurological tests (36.5%), and social activities (46.8%) “rarely”. ConclusionsThe study findings indicated that oncology nurses require further education and training in evidence-based practices for the assessment and management of CIPN.

Validity of Patient-Reported Outcome Measures in Evaluating Nerve Damage Following Chemotherapy

Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) is a substantial adverse effect of anticancer treatments. As such, the assessment of CIPN remains critically important in both research and clinic settings. To compare the validity of various patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) with neurophysiological and sensory functional measures as the optimal method of CIPN assessment. This cohort study evaluated participants treated with neurotoxic chemotherapy across 2 cohorts using a dual-study design. Participants commencing treatment were assessed prospectively at beginning of neurotoxic treatment, midtreatment, and at the end of treatment. Participants who completed treatment up to 5 years prior were assessed cross-sectionally and completed a single assessment time point. Participants were recruited from oncology centers in Australia from August 2015 to November 2022. Data analysis occurred from February to November 2023. Neurotoxic cancer treatment including taxanes, platinums, vinca-alkaloids, proteasome inhibitors, and thalidomide. CIPN was assessed via PROMs (European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire [EORTC-CIPN20], Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy/Gynecological Cancer Group Neurotoxicity Questionnaire (FACT/GOG-Ntx), and the patient-reported outcomes version of the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events [PRO-CTCAE]), neurological and neurophysiological assessment (Total Neuropathy Score and sural and tibial compound nerve amplitudes), and sensory measures (Grating orientation, Von Frey monofilament, and 2-point discrimination tasks). Core measurement properties of CIPN outcome measures were evaluated. Convergent and known-groups validity was assessed cross-sectionally following treatment completion, and responsiveness was evaluated prospectively during treatment. Neurological, neurophysiological, and sensory outcome measure scores were compared between those who reported high and low levels of CIPN symptoms using linear regressions. A total of 1033 participants (median [IQR] age, 61 [50-59] years; 676 female [65.4%]) were recruited to this study, incorporating 1623 assessments. PROMs demonstrated best ability to accurately assess CIPN (convergent validity), especially the PRO-CTCAE composite score (r = 0.85; P < .001) and EORTC-CIPN20 (r = 0.79; P < .001). PROMS also demonstrated the best ability to discriminate between CIPN severity (known-groups validity) and to detect changes at onset of CIPN development (responsiveness), especially for EORTC-CIPN20 (d = 0.67; 95% CI, 0.52-0.83), FACT/GOG-Ntx (d = 0.65; 95% CI, 0.49-0.81) and the PRO-CTCAE (d = 0.83; 95% CI, 0.64-1.02). Other measures did not achieve threshold for convergent validity (α < 0.7). Neurophysiological and sensory measures did not demonstrate acceptable responsiveness. In regression models, neurological, neurophysiological, and sensory outcome measures were significantly impaired in participants who reported high levels of CIPN symptoms compared with those who reported low levels of CIPN symptoms. In this cohort study of 1033 cancer patients, PROMs were the only measures to satisfy all 3 core measurement property criteria (convergent validity, known-groups validity, and responsiveness). These findings suggest that adoption of PROMs in clinical practice can equip clinicians with valuable information in assessing CIPN morbidity.

Topical Cannabidiol for Established Chemotherapy-Induced Neuropathy: A Pilot Randomized Placebo-Controlled Trial.

Background: Patients have been known to use cannabinoids for treating established chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) based on anecdotal information and retrospective reports suggesting that such might be beneficial. In response, a double-blinded, placebo-controlled, randomized, pilot clinical trial was developed to evaluate whether resultant data would support a phase III trial for testing whether a cannabidiol (CBD) cream might improve CIPN. Methods: Forty patients with established CIPN were randomized, in a double-blinded manner, to topical CBD or a placebo cream. The study product was applied for 2 weeks, followed by a crossover for 2 weeks. Neuropathy was evaluated using the European Organization of Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC)-CIPN20, the Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy Assessment Tool, and the Global Impression of Change instruments. Side effects were recorded by symptom diaries. Results: The EORTC-CIPN20 scores were similar in the patients receiving CBD versus the placebo. Likewise, the toxicity scores were similar in patients who received the CBD versus the placebo. Conclusions: This pilot trial did not support that the studied CBD isolate cream improved painful established CIPN. It was well tolerated overall. Clinical Trial Registration Number: NCT05388058.

Effect of gradient pressure therapy on the prevention of chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy in patients with breast cancer.

To investigate the effect of gradient pressure therapy on the prevention of chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) and improvement in activities of daily living (ADL) in patients with breast cancer. Eighty female patients with breast cancer treated at Tangshan People's Hospital between October 2022 and July 2023 were selected as research participants and divided into control and intervention, with 40 patients in each group. The control group received routine treatment and care, whereas the intervention group received gradient pressure therapy based on routine treatment and care. Incidence of peripheral neuropathy and the degree of impact on ADL between the two groups were compared after the intervention for cycles 2, 4, and 6. There was no significant difference in the general information between the two groups (P > 0.05). After two intervention cycles, there was no significant difference in the incidence of CIPN, various dimensions of Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy Assessment Tool (CIPNAT), and total scores between the two groups (P > 0.05). After four intervention cycles, the two groups had a statistically significant difference in the incidence of CIPN, sensory dimension, general activity dimension, and total CIPNAT score (P < 0.05). After six intervention cycles, there was a significant difference in the incidence of CIPN, sensory dimension, fine activity dimension, general activity dimension, and total CIPNAT score between the two groups (P < 0.05), while there was no significant difference in the other dimensions (P > 0.05). Gradient pressure therapy can effectively prevent or alleviate peripheral neuropathy in patients with breast cancer undergoing chemotherapy and improve their ability to perform ADL. Thus, it is safe, effective, and worthy of clinical application. RMYY-LLKS-2022-054.

Effect of Silybum Marianum on Reduction of Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neurotoxicity with Cisplatin.

Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neurotoxicity (CIPN) is one of the major complications of chemotherapy regimens commonly used in the treatment of solid and hematologic cancers. Given the high incidence of CIPN in antitumor therapies in patients and limited studies on antioxidants, this study was aimed to investigate the effect of Silybum marianum (SM) on cisplatin-induced peripheral neuropathy. This double-blind randomized clinical trial study was performed on 60 cancer patients treated with cisplatin chemotherapy at Seyyed-o-Shohada Hospital of Isfahan during 2019-2020. The patients were divided into two parallel groups as intervention (treated by SM) and placebo, and DN4 (Douleur neuropathique 4 questions) and CIPNAT (chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy assessment tool) were completed for patients in the before and after intervention groups and compared between the two groups. The mean of DN4 score in the before and after study in the intervention group was in 1.76 ± 1.24 and 2.07 ± 2.03, respectively (P = 0.38), and in the control group was 1.41 ± 1.28 ± 3.11 ± 2.86, respectively (P = 0.012). The mean CIPNAT score in the intervention groups was 5.93 ± 3.65 and 4.20 ± 3.23 (P = 0.01), and in the control group was 4.20 ± 4.22 and 4.16 ± 4.03 (P = 0.39). Based on our data, SM is an effective agent in reducing peripheral neuropathy. The use of SM was associated with decreased scores of peripheral neuropathy and was helpful in patients undergoing chemotherapy with cisplatin.

Exploring the Effectiveness of Ajwain Cream in Treating Taxane-induced Peripheral Neuropathy in Cancer Patients: A Pilot, Randomised and Double-blind Clinical Trial.

Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy is a common disorder among cancer patients receiving various chemotherapeutic protocols. The present study aimed to explore the feasibility of ajwain (Trachyspermum ammi [L.] Sprague) cream in treating peripheral neuropathy symptoms triggered by taxane chemotherapeutic agents. This was a pilot, double-blind, and randomised clinical trial on patients with peripheral neuropathy attributable to chemotherapy with taxane drugs during 2021-2022 in Tehran. Patients received ajwain or placebo cream for four weeks and filled out the chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy assessment tool (CIPNAT) at the start and end finale of the trial. Side effects were also noted. Thirty patients suffering from breast, lung, gastro-intestinal, or prostate cancer were allocated to each of the drug and placebo groups. The mean difference in CIPNAT score between the groups was 0.83, demonstrating the statistical ineffectiveness of the drug compared with the placebo (P = 0.372). The safety profile showed promising outcomes at the end of the trial. Although the effectiveness of ajwain cream was unacceptable in treating chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy symptoms, multicentre controlled trials with ample sample size are mandatory for an all-inclusive inference.

Targeting therapy-induced senescence as a novel strategy to combat chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy.

Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) is a treatment-limiting adverse effect of anticancer therapy that complicates the lifestyle of many cancer survivors. There is currently no gold-standard for the assessment or management of CIPN. Subsequently, understanding the underlying mechanisms that lead to the development of CIPN is essential for finding better pharmacological therapy. Therapy-induced senescence (TIS) is a form of senescence that is triggered in malignant and non-malignant cells in response to the exposure to chemotherapy. Recent evidence has also suggested that TIS develops in the dorsal root ganglia of rodent models of CIPN. Interestingly, several components of the senescent phenotype are commensurate with the currently established primary processes implicated in the pathogenesis of CIPN including mitochondrial dysfunction, oxidative stress, and neuroinflammation. In this article, we review the literature that supports the hypothesis that TIS could serve as a holistic mechanism leading to CIPN, and we propose the potential for investigating senotherapeutics as means to mitigate CIPN in cancer survivors.

Development and validation of the chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy integrated assessment – oxaliplatin subscale: a prospective cohort study

BackgroundCurrent chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) assessment tools mostly have poor sensitivity and weak anti-interference, so that it is sometimes difficult to provide substantive guidance for clinical intervention. This study aimed to develop an assessment tool dedicated for oxaliplatin to address these limitations.MethodsThis study screened 445 OIPN-related literatures for producing a symptom list, and developed the questionnaire module through expert supplement, item generation, content correlation analysis, pre-testing, and item improvement. The validation phase used a Chinese population-based prospective cohort study from June 2021 to July 2022. Patients were requested to complete the tested questionnaire, QLQ-CIPN20 and the CTCAE grading one day before cycles 2–6 of chemotherapy. Cronbach’s α coefficient and intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) were calculated for the internal consistency and stability analysis, respectively. Exploratory factor analysis was conducted to investigate the construct validity. The correlations among the tested questionnaire, QLQ-CIPN20 and CTCAE were compared for the criterion validity analysis. Wilcoxon signed-rank sum test was utilized to compare the sensitivity between the tested questionnaire and QLQ-CIPN20.ResultA 20-item CIPN assessment tool named chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy integrated assessment – oxaliplatin subscale (CIPNIA-OS) was developed. The validation phase included 186 patients. Cronbach's α coefficient of CIPNIA-OS was 0.764 (> 0.7), and ICC was 0.997 (between 0.9 and 1). The structure of CIPNIA-OS containing seven factors was examined. The correlation coefficient between CIPNIA-OS and CTCAE was 0.661 (95%CI 0.623 to 0.695), which was significantly higher than that between QLQ-CIPN20 and CTCAE (0.417, 95%CI 0.363 to 0.469, p < 0.01). Besides, the total score of CIPNIA-OS was mostly higher than QLQ-CIPN20, with an average difference of 2.189 (CI 95% 2.056 to 2.322), and the difference gradually expanded with the progress of chemotherapy (p < 0.05).ConclusionThis study developed an original CIPN questionnaire which was dedicated for OIPN assessment. It was a comprehensive tool that covered acute OIPN symptoms and integrated features from several proven CIPN assessment tools. The validation results supported that CIPNIA-OS had satisfactory reliability, stability, construct, criterion validity, and was more accuracy and sensitive than QLQ-CIPN20 in the evaluation of OIPN.

Peripheral neuropathy and lifestyle factors in women with breast cancer receiving taxane-based chemotherapy: Pathway analysis

PurposePeripheral neuropathy adversely affects the treatment process of cancer, and thus it is important to reveal the factors leading to peripheral neuropathy and to take the necessary precautions to avoid it. This study was conducted to investigate the relationship between chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) and lifestyle factors (nutrition, physical activity and sleep quality). MethodsThis descriptive and correlational study was conducted with 108 individuals who were treated in the chemotherapy unit of a hospital between April 2021 and April 2022 in Turkey. Data were collected using the Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy Assessment Tool (CIPNAT), the International Physical Activity Questionnaire (IPAQ), the Mini Nutritional Assessment Test (MNA), and the sleep level Visual Analog Scale. Number, percentages, means, and standard deviations were calculated, and multiple linear regression analysis and path analysis were conducted to analyze the data. ResultsThe results indicate that the total MET score significantly and positively predicted the sleep scale score (β = 0.24, p < 0.01), while it negatively and significantly predicted the CIPNAT score (β = −0.30, p < 0.001). In addition, both the MNA screening score and the sleep scale score significantly and negatively predicted the CIPNAT score (β = −0.25, p < 0.01, β = −0.29, p < 0.001, respectively). ConclusionsLifestyle factors (exercise, nutrition, sleep) were found to have an effect on peripheral neuropathy. It is thought that increasing the level of exercise improves sleep quality, and regular nutrition, quality sleep and increased physical activity may be effective in reducing peripheral neuropathy.

Determination of the Influence of Peripheral Neuropathy Symptoms on Quality of Life in Breast Cancer Patients: A Cross-Sectional Study with Four Follow-Ups.

This study aims to evaluate the impact of peripheral neuropathy symptoms throughout with monthly follow-ups during 4 months of paclitaxel treatment. This prospective cross-sectional study was conducted with 79 patients. The study population consisted of female patients with breast cancer between August 2018 and January 2019. ''Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy Assessment Tool'' and ''EORTC C30 Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire'' were applied with four follow-ups. The study was undertaken in accordance with the STROBE checklist for cross- sectional studies. The Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy Assessment Tool except for the general activity subdimension were statistically significant in the ratings of second, compared to first; third compared to first and second; fourth compared to first, second, and third follow-up periods. The overall mean of the EORTC C30 Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire, functioning, symptom, and global health status were statistically significant in the evaluations of second, compared with first; third compared with first and second; fourth compared with first, second, and third follow-up periods. Findings from this study suggest that the increase in neuropathy symptoms during cures negatively affects the quality of life.

The phenotype and value of nerve conduction studies in measuring chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy: A secondary analysis of pooled data.

Nerve conduction studies (NCS) have been suggested as gold standard for diagnosing and monitoring peripheral neuropathies. However, its value in measuring chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) is not clearly understood. Our study aimed to examine the role and performance of NCS in CIPN assessment through a secondary analysis. Pooled data pertaining to NCS, clinical examination, symptoms, and quality of life from patients with cancer enrolled in five studies were used. These patients had received taxane- or oxaliplatin-based chemotherapy. The data were grouped in cohorts of before initiation of chemotherapy, during chemotherapy, at the end of chemotherapy, and at recovery stage according to the time points of assessment in the original studies. Data was available from a total of 84 patients (74 females and 10 males) and a total of 160 NCS assessments. NCS results confirmed that damage of sensory nerves is more profound than motor nerves in patients at different stages of neurotoxic chemotherapy. No strong correlation was identified between NCS parameters and clinical examination outcomes as well as patient-reported symptoms and quality of life. NCS did not perform well in discriminating clinically relevant CIPN (area under the curve [AUC]=0.51-0.77). Our findings suggest that NCS may have limited value in diagnosing CIPN. Future prospective studies with baseline values are needed to clarify our tentative conclusions.

Exploring assessment of balance using virtual reality in patients at risk of chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy.

Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) is a common dose-limiting toxicity for people treated for cancer. Impaired balance and falls are functional consequences of CIPN. Virtual reality (VR) technology may be able to assess balance and identify patients at risk of falls. To assess the impact of potentially neurotoxic chemotherapy on balance using VR, and explore associations between VR balance assessment, falls and CIPN. This prospective, repeated measures longitudinal study was conducted at two Australian cancer centres. Eligible participants were commencing adjuvant chemotherapy containing a taxane for breast cancer, or oxaliplatin for colorectal cancer (CRC), per institutional guidelines. Balance assessments using VR were conducted at baseline, end of chemotherapy and 3 and 6 months after completion of chemotherapy. Participants also completed a comprehensive CIPN assessment comprising clinical and patient-reported outcomes, and recorded falls or near falls. Out of 34 participants consented, 24 (71%) had breast cancer and 10 (29%) had CRC. Compared to baseline, balance threshold was reduced in 10/28 (36%) evaluable participants assessed at the end of chemotherapy, and persistent in 7/22 (32%) at 6months. CIPN was identified in 86% at end of chemotherapy and persisted to 6months after chemotherapy completion in 73%. Falls or near falls were reported by 12/34 (35%) participants, and were associated with impaired VR balance threshold (P=0.002). While VR balance assessment was no better at identifying CIPN than existing measures, it is a potential surrogate method to assess patients at risk of falls from CIPN.

Development and consensus process for a clinical pathway for the assessment and management of chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy

BackgroundCancer patients treated with neurotoxic chemotherapy are at risk of developing neurological symptoms that can impact functional capacity and quality of life. However, there are no standardised pathways to assess and manage chemotherapy-induced peripheral neurotoxicity (CIPN). This study aimed to determine consensus on statements regarding a CIPN assessment and management clinical pathway.MethodsA CIPN clinical pathway (CIPN-path) was developed and reviewed by an expert multi-disciplinary panel and consumers. Agreement with 18 statements regarding four content themes (pretreatment review, screening and assessment, management and referral, and CIPN-path feasibility) were assessed by 70 Australian respondents (68 health professionals, 2 consumers), using a 2-stage Delphi survey process to reach consensus. Respondents rated statements using a 5-point Likert scale to determine the level of agreement, with consensus defined as ≥ 80% of respondents agreeing with each statement.ResultsThe consensus was reached for 14 of 18 items after stage 1 and all items after stage 2. Feedback was obtained for all items to refine the CIPN-path. There was an agreement on important characteristics of the CIPN-path, including pretreatment screening, regular patient-reported assessment, and a stepped-care approach to investigating and managing symptom burden. There was a lack of agreement on who should oversee CIPN assessment, which may differ according to the structure and resources of each site.ConclusionsThere was an overall agreement concerning the CIPN-path to assess and manage CIPN, which may be adapted accordingly to the resources of each clinic. The CIPN-path may assist teams across different health services in identifying CIPN symptoms, aiding decision-making, and reducing morbidity from CIPN.

Characteristics of Inpatients With Blood Cancers Who Experience a Fall: A Retrospective Study.

Inpatients with cancer are at the greatest risk for falling. Although studies have identified the characteristics of patients with cancer who fall, few studies have focused on the characteristics of patients with blood cancers who fall. The objectives of this study are to identify characteristics of inpatients with blood cancers who fall and implement fall-mitigation efforts through an enhanced assessment of chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy. Descriptive design and retrospective review of 51 patient falls were used to identify characteristics of inpatients with cancer who fell. The majority of patients who fell were male (n = 33), and most falls occurred during the day shift (n = 24). Few patients were listed on the Morse Fall Risk Scale for mental status and forgetting limitations (n = 7), and most were not identified as a high fall risk (n = 30). The majority of falls were associated with toileting needs (n = 32). Patients spent a mean of 12.73 days in the hospital before falling. Thirty-two patients received chemotherapy prior to their fall, 25 of whom received neurotoxic chemotherapy.

Exploring Clinicians' Perspectives of Barriers to Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy Assessment and Management in Oncology Practice: A Qualitative Analysis of Semi-structured Interviews.

Quantitative reports suggest that the assessment and management of chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) in practice is suboptimal. The purpose of this qualitative analysis was to explore clinician-related perspectives of CIPN assessment, management, and the use of a CIPN decision support tool. Clinicians from the breast oncology, gastrointestinal oncology, or multiple myeloma disease centers at Dana-Farber Cancer Institute who interacted with a CIPN clinician decision support algorithm were eligible to participate in the semi-structured interviews. The interview guide included questions about CIPN assessment, management, and clinician-decision support tool use. All interviews were audio-recorded, transcribed, and analyzed using inductive content analysis. Of the 39 eligible clinicians, 15 agreed to be interviewed. Interviewed clinicians were mainly physicians (73.3) and White, non-Hispanic (93.3%). Main themes from the interviews included (1) CIPN management practice patterns (eg, endorsement of non-recommended management strategies or lack of standardization for chemotherapy dose reduction) and barriers (eg, insurance prior authorizations required for duloxetine prescription), (2) CIPN assessment practice patterns (eg, use of subjective instead of objective CIPN assessment approaches) and barriers (eg, difficult to interpret patients' CIPN report between visits), and (3) utilization of the clinician decision support tool (eg, all assessment tasks lead to same management options). There are several barriers to clinicians' use of evidence-based CIPN assessment and management strategies. Future work should be focused on addressing barriers to duloxetine prescription, developing evidence-based CIPN assessment and management strategies, improving symptom monitoring, and facilitating referrals to existing supportive care services.

Methods and protocols for chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) mouse models using paclitaxel.

While cancer patients may have chemotherapeutics to thank for being cured of their malignancy, they are often left to suffer a disabling neuropathy induced by that same cancer treatment. This neuropathy, known as chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy, or CIPN, is one of the most debilitating survivorship concerns for patients, with many citing hallmark symptoms of hyperalgesia, allodynia, and numbness, and subsequently reducing their dose or even ceasing treatment altogether. Investigations into this interplay between the antineoplastic activity of chemotherapeutic agents and the preservation of peripheral nerve health are therefore crucial for the development of CIPN treatment and prevention methods. Responding to need, current literature is inundated with varying preclinical models of CIPN. This chapter thus seeks to provide a detailed and reliable methodology for the induction and assessment of CIPN in mice, using a preclinical model that is both reproducible and translatable to several aspects of the clinical phenotype. Specifically, this chapter lays out a model for intermittent low-dose paclitaxel induction of CIPN in C57BL/6J mice, and a testing of this induction via von Frey filament mechanical hypersensitivity assays, a mechanical hyposensitivity (numbness) assay, and a cold-thermal allodynia assay (acetone test). These protocols can easily be adjusted to fit the needs of individual CIPN experiments, as stated throughout the chapter.

Clinician and patient experiences when providing and receiving information and support for managing chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy: A qualitative multiple methods study.

ObjectiveTo improve patient experience of chemotherapy‐induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN), it is crucial to identify how patients develop their understanding and perception of CIPN. A wider understanding of the experiences of clinicians who provide CIPN information and support is also needed. This study explored clinician and patient experience of the provision of care, information and support for CIPN.MethodsData were collected between July and November 2019 using multiple qualitative methods. Non‐participant observations were undertaken in colorectal and breast cancer clinics and at clinician stations, including the observation of chemotherapy consultations between patients and clinicians. Semi‐structured interviews with people with cancer and clinicians were also conducted. Data were analysed using inductive reflexive thematic analysis.ResultsThree major themes emerged: (1) CIPN is a hidden chemotherapy side effect, (2) assessment and management of CIPN is disconnected and (3) patients and clinicians expect openness in CIPN symptom reporting, information provision and management.ConclusionFindings show the need to address the lack of patients' overall familiarity with CIPN. Echoing earlier studies, our findings suggest that knowledge and understanding about CIPN among clinicians are limited or lacking. These insights from patient and clinicians' CIPN experiences can inform future interventions that may address the genuine needs of patients and enhance CIPN support.

Systematic review of long-term chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) following adjuvant oxaliplatin for colorectal cancer.

Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) is the most common dose-limiting side effect of oxaliplatin. It often persists and can adversely affect quality of life of colorectal cancer (CRC) survivors. This systematic review explored the proportions of patients with persistent CIPN and the reporting methods used. MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science and CINAHL were searched up to March 2021 for publications reporting CIPN outcomes following adjuvant oxaliplatin-containing chemotherapy at prespecified timepoints in participants with CRC. Secondary outcomes assessed the tools used to measure CIPN. Two authors reviewed full text publications for eligibility, data extraction and appraisal. Meta-analysis was performed where Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (any grade) was reported at the most frequent timepoints. From 7895 citations identified, 27 studies met the eligibility criteria: six were randomised control trials, and 21 were non-randomised studies. Pooled prevalence of CIPN at 6, 12, 24 and 36months after chemotherapy were 58%, 45%, 32% and 24% respectively. The average prevalence of CIPN decreased by 26% per year after chemotherapy (pooled RR = 0.74; 95% CI 0.72-0.75). Across all studies, ten separate tools were used as the primary measure of CIPN. Quality appraisal identified open-label design and inadequate reporting of participants lost to follow-up as the main methodological limitations. Our summary of reported rates of persistent CIPN indicates substantial long-term toxicity affecting CRC survivors, and will help clinicians estimate CIPN risk and its change over time. The heterogeneity of CIPN measures identified in the review highlights the need for a standardised CIPN assessment.