Chemotherapy In Gastric Cancer Patients Research Articles

The Gustave Roussy Immune score is a powerful biomarker for predicting therapeutic resistance to chemotherapy in gastric cancer patients.

It is highly important to be able to predict the therapeutic efficacy of chemotherapy on patients with unresectable advanced or recurrent gastric cancer (GC). The Gustave Roussy Immune Score (GRIm-s) is a predictor of therapeutic sensitivity to chemotherapy and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in other cancers. The present study aimed to analyze the association of the GRIm-s with the therapeutic sensitivity of first-line chemotherapy in GC patients. We included 156 patients receiving primary chemotherapy treatment for unresectable or advanced recurrent GC between January 2012 and December 2021 at our institution. We evaluated the correlation between the GRIm-s and therapeutic sensitivities to chemotherapy. The GRIm-s was assessed before the start of first-line chemotherapy. Among the 156 patients, 138 (88.5%) and 18 (11.5%) were classified in the low- and high-risk groups, respectively. The GRIm-s high-risk group was significantly older (p = 0.013), had more advanced unresectable cancer (p = 0.0098), and was significantly less likely to progress to second-line chemotherapy (p = 0.014). The overall survival rate (OS) (p = 0.039) and the progression free survival rate (PFS) (p = 0.017) were significantly worse in the GRIm-s high-risk group. The high GRIm-s was an independent prognostic factor for poor survival in multivariate analysis (p = 0.0094). Focusing on the GRIm-s before first-line chemotherapy initiation for unresectable advanced or postoperative recurrent GC was useful in predicting the therapeutic resistance to chemotherapy, transition to second-line chemotherapy, and poor prognosis.

Dynamic changes in body composition during XELOX/SOX chemotherapy in patients with gastric cancer.

In this study, we compared the dynamic changes in body composition during XELOX/SOX chemotherapy in patients with gastric cancer. Furthermore, we investigated the potential impact of these changes on the occurrence of toxic side effects. Patients with gastric cancer who received adjuvant or first-line XELOX/SOX chemotherapy between January 2020 and June 2023 were enrolled. The Brief Conghua Scale was used to assess energy intake, and nutritional management was carried out with reference to the Chinese Guidelines for Nutritional Therapy of Cancer 2020. The NRS 2002 Nutritional Risk Screening Scale, PG-SGA scale, bioelectrical impedance analysis, and dynamic changes in lumbar 3 vertebral skeletal muscle index were compared between baseline and post-chemotherapy in the study. The neutropenia was evaluated using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events V.5.0, developed by the National Institutes of Health. Dynamic follow-up was completed in 39 cases, with a mean follow-up time of 117.62 ± 43.38 days. The incidence of sarcopenia increased significantly after chemotherapy, escalating from 46.2% to 51.3%. After chemotherapy, the mean L3SMI decreased from 36.00 cm2/m2 to 34.99 cm2/m2. Furthermore, when compared to pre-chemotherapy values, the body composition indexes body mass index (BMI), SL3, fat mass free index (FFMI), lean body mass (LBM), and body surface area (BSA) were significantly reduced after chemotherapy. Regardless of baseline or post-chemotherapy status, the incidence of grade ≥ 3 neutropenia was significantly higher in the sarcopenia group than in the non-sarcopenia group. Furthermore, when the skeletal muscle index decreased during chemotherapy, the incidence of grade ≥ 3 neutropenia was significantly higher in both the sarcopenia and non-sarcopenia groups compared to baseline. When the incidence of grade ≥ 3 neutropenia in the post-chemotherapy sarcopenia group was compared to baseline status, the increase was significantly higher in the sarcopenia group than in the maintenance/increase group. Skeletal muscle mass decreased progressively during XELOX/SOX chemotherapy in gastric cancer patients, followed by a higher incidence of grade ≥ 3 neutropenia.

Spectral CT vs. diffusion-weighted imaging for the quantitative prediction of pathologic response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in locally advanced gastric cancer.

To compare the performance of spectral CT and diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI) for predicting pathologic response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) in locally advanced gastric cancer (LAGC). This was a retrospective analysis drawn from a prospective dataset. Sixty-five patients who underwent baseline concurrent triple-phase enhanced spectral CT and DWI-MRI and standard NAC plus radical gastrectomy were enrolled, and those with poor images were excluded. The tumor regression grade (TRG) was the reference standard, and patients were classified as responders (TRG 0 + 1) or non-responders (TRG 2 + 3). Quantitative iodine concentration (IC), normalized IC (nIC), and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) were measured by placing a freehand region of interest manually on the maximal two-dimensional plane. Their differences between responders and non-responders were compared. The performances of significant parameters were evaluated by the receiver operating characteristic analysis. The correlations between parameters and TRG status were explored through Spearman correlation coefficient test. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis was adopted to analyze their relationship with patient survival. nICDP and ADC were associated with the TRG and yielded comparable performances for predicting TRG categories, with area under the curve (AUC) of 0.674 and 0.673, respectively. Their combination achieved a significantly increased AUC of 0.770 (p ; 0.05) and was associated with patient disease-free survival, with hazard ratio of 2.508 (1.043-6.029). Spectral CT and DWI were equally useful imaging techniques for predicting pathologic response to NAC in LAGC. The combination of nICDP and ADC gained significant incremental benefits and was related to patient disease-free survival. Spectral CT and DWI-based quantitative measurements are effective markers for predicting the pathologic regression outcomes of locally advanced gastric cancer patients after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. • The pathologic tumor regression grade, the standard criteria for treatment response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in gastric cancer patients, is difficult to predict early. • The quantitative parameters of normalized iodine concentration at delay phase and apparent diffusion coefficients were correlated with pathologic response; their combination demonstrated incremental benefits and was associated with patient disease-free survival. • Spectral CT and DWI are equally useful imaging modalities for predicting tumor regression grade after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with locally advanced gastric cancer.

Effects of Yipi Huayu decoction on tumor markers, immune function, and adverse reactions during chemotherapy in gastric cancer patients: a retrospective propensity score-matched study.

To analyze the effects of Yianpi Huayu Decoction on tumor markers, immune function and adverse reactions during chemotherapy in patients with gastric cancer. The clinical data of 154 patients with progressive gastric cancer who attended Baoji Maternal and Child Health Hospital (Daijiawan Branch) from January 2020 to March 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. The patients were divided into an observation group (61 cases) and a control group (93 cases) according to the treatment method and were matched using propensity score matching (PSM). The control group was given SOX neoadjuvant chemotherapy regimen (oxaliplatin + tiglio), and the observation group was given spleen-strengthening and blood-stasis-reducing tonics as adjuvant treatment on the basis of the treatment given to the control group. Clinical efficacy in the two groups was observed, as well as Carbohydrate Antigen 19-9 (CA19-9), Carbohydrate Antigen 72-4 (CA72-4), and Carcinoembryonic Antigen (CEA) levels, immune function (IgA, IgM, and IgG), Karnofsky Performance Scale (KPS), and occurrence of adverse reactions. After matching, there was no significant difference in the total clinical efficiency between the two groups (P > 0.05). After matching, there were no differences in CA19-9, CA72-4, and CEA levels between the observation group and the control group before or after treatment (P > 0.05). After matching, the IgA, IgM, and IgG levels in the observation group were significantly better than those in the control group after treatment (P < 0.05). The incidence of leukopenia (P = 0.011) and diarrhea (P = 0.011) during treatment was higher in the control group than in the observation group after matching. The KPS score of the observation group was higher than that of the control group after matching (P < 0.05). After matching, Cox regression analysis found that the treatment regimen (P < 0.001, HR = 2.527), TNM staging (P = 0.001, HR = 0.471), local recurrence (P = 0.001, HR = 2.147), and pretreatment CEA (P = 0.011, HR = 1.131) were independent prognostic factors affecting patients' 2-year survival. While the spleen-enhancing and blood-stasis-removing herbal formula combined with the SOX chemotherapy regimen did not improve therapeutic outcomes in gastric cancer patients, it did enhance immune function, reduce adverse reactions, and improve quality of life.

Diagnostic accuracy of radiomics-based machine learning for neoadjuvant chemotherapy response and survival prediction in gastric cancer patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BackgroundIn recent years, researchers have explored the use of radiomics to predict neoadjuvant chemotherapy outcomes in gastric cancer (GC). Yet, a lingering debate persists regarding the accuracy of these predictions. Against this backdrop, this study was conducted to examine the accuracy of radiomics in predicting the response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in GC patients. MethodsAn exhaustive search of relevant studies was conducted in PubMed, Cochrane, Embase, and Web of Science databases up to February 21, 2023. The radiomics quality scoring (RQS) tool was employed to assess study quality. Tumor response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy and survival outcomes were examined as outcome measures. ResultsFourteen studies involving 3,373 GC patients who had received neoadjuvant chemotherapy were incorporated in our meta-analysis. The mean RQS score across all studies was 36.3%, ranging between 0 and 63.9%. On the validation cohort, when the modeling variables were restricted to radiomic features alone, the predictive performance was characterized by a c-index of 0.750 (95% CI: 0.710–0.790), with a sensitivity of 0.67 (95% CI: 0.58–0.75) and a specificity of 0.77 (95% CI: 0.69–0.84) for the prediction of neoadjuvant chemotherapy response. When clinical data was integrated with radiomic features as modeling variables, the predictive performance improved, yielding a c-index of 0.814 (95% CI: 0.780–0.847), a sensitivity of 0.78 [95% CI: 0.70–0.84], and a specificity of 0.73 [95% CI: 0.67–0.79]. ConclusionsRadiomics holds promise to noninvasively predict neoadjuvant chemotherapy response and survival outcomes among patients with locally advanced GC. Additionally, we underscore the need for future multicenter studies and the development of imaging-sourced tools for risk stratification in this patient population.

Early Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Cytoreductive Surgery and Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy for Gastric Cancer Patients with Limited Peritoneal Carcinomatosis.

Gastric cancer patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) have a poor prognosis, with a median overall survival of 10 months when treated with systemic chemotherapy only. Cohort studies showed that cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS/HIPEC) might improve the prognosis for gastric cancer patients with limited PC. Besides generating trial data on clinical effectiveness, it is crucial to timely collect information on economic aspects to guide the reimbursement decision-making process. No previous data have been published on the cost(-effectiveness) of CRS/HIPEC in this group of patients. Therefore, we performed an early model-based cost-effectiveness analysis of CRS/HIPEC for gastric cancer patients with limited PC in the Dutch setting. We constructed a two-state (alive-dead) Markov transition model to evaluate costs and clinical outcomes from a Dutch healthcare perspective. Clinical outcomes, transition probabilities and utilities were derived from literature and verified by clinical experts in the field. Costs were measured using two available representative cohorts (2010-2017): one 'systemic chemotherapy only' cohort and one 'CRS/HIPEC' cohort (n=10 each). Incremental cost-utility ratios (ICURs) were expressed as Euros per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY). We performed probabilistic and deterministic sensitivity, scenario, and value-of-information analyses using a willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold of €80,000/QALY, which reflects the Dutch norm for severe diseases. In the base-case analysis, CRS/HIPEC yielded more QALYs (increment of 0.68) and more costs (increment of €34,706) compared with systemic chemotherapy only, resulting in an ICUR of €50,990/QALY. The probability that CRS/HIPEC was cost effective compared with systemic chemotherapy alone was 64%. To reduce uncertainty, the expected value of perfect information amounted to €4,021,468. The scenario analyses did not alter the results and showed that treatment costs, lifetime health-related quality of life and overall survival had the largest influence on the model. The presented early cost-effectiveness analysis suggests that adding CRS/HIPEC to systemic chemotherapy for gastric cancer patients with limited PC has a good chance of being cost-effectiveness compared with systemic chemotherapy alone when using a WTP of €80,000/QALY. However, there is substantial uncertainty in view of the current available data on effectiveness. Results from the ongoing phase III PERISCOPE II trial are therefore crucial for further decisions on treatment policy and its cost-effectiveness.

Impact of Signet-Ring Cell Histology in the Management of Patients with Non-Metastatic Gastric Cancer: Results from a Retrospective Multicenter Analysis Comparing FLOT Perioperative Chemotherapy vs. Surgery Followed by Adjuvant Chemotherapy.

FLOT perioperative chemotherapy represents the standard of care in non-metastatic gastric cancer patients. Signet-ring cell positivity is associated with a worse prognosis in patients with gastric cancer treated with chemotherapy. Comparison between FLOT perioperative chemotherapy vs. surgery followed by adjuvant chemotherapy based on signet-ring cell positivity is lacking. The aim of the analysis was to compare perioperative FLOT with adjuvant chemotherapy in gastric cancer patients stratified by signet-ring cell positivity. We conducted a retrospective multicenter analysis based on disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) in patients with gastric cancer who received perioperative chemotherapy with a FLOT regimen and compared their survival with a historical cohort of patients treated with adjuvant chemotherapy, matched by cT and cN stage and by tumor histological features. Seventy-six patients were enrolled and 24 (32%) were signet-ring cell positive. At a median follow-up time of 39 months, the median DFS was 26.3 months and the median OS was 37.3 months. Signet-ring cell positivity was associated with a shorter OS (median OS: 20.4 vs. 46.9 months, HR: 3.30, 95%CI: 1.56-6.99, p = 0.0018) and DFS (mDFS: 15.2 vs. 38.6 months, HR: 3.18, 95%CI: 1.55-6.54, p = 0.0016). This was confirmed by multivariate analysis for DFS (Exp(B): 2.55) and OS (Exp(B): 2.68). After propensity score matching, statistically significant shorter DFS (HR: 3.30, 95%CI: 1.50-7.35, p = 0.003) and OS (HR: 5.25, 95%CI: 2.18-12-68, p = 0.0002) were observed for patients with signet-ring cell positivity who received perioperative treatment vs. those who received surgery followed by adjuvant chemotherapy. Signet-ring positivity was associated with shorter DFS and OS in patients who received perioperative treatment with FLOT compared with surgery followed by adjuvant therapy. These data suggest that for patients with signet-ring cell histology, FLOT perioperative treatment might not always be the best choice of treatment, and further research should be focused on this group of patients.

The clinical effect of conversion surgery for advanced gastric cancer patients with peritoneal metastasis.

The prognosis of gastric cancer (GC) patients with peritoneal metastasis (PM) is extremely poor. We developed a new promising regimen combining intraperitoneal (i.p.) paclitaxel (PTX) with systemic PTX and S-1 chemotherapy for GC patients with PM. However, the value of conversion surgery (CS) for GC patients with PM remains unclear. This study aimed to clarify the clinical effect of CS from our updated previous report. We retrospectively analyzed 50 GC patients, divided into chemotherapy alone (CTx; n=15) and conversion surgery intervention (CSI; n=35) groups. In the CTx group, chemotherapy was continued in responders, while in the CSI group, surgery was performed in chemotherapy-responders. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS) of the two groups. The secondary endpoint was the safety of CS. In the CTx group, 9 of 15 patients (60%) responded to chemotherapy. In the CSI group, PM disappeared in 22 of 35 patients (62.9%), all of whom underwent CS. Post-operative complications occurred in 2 patients (9%) who underwent CS. There were no treatment-related deaths. Regarding OS, there was no significant difference between the two groups [P=0.14; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.3016-1.197], nor between chemotherapy-responders in the two groups (P=0.059; 95% CI, 0.1473-1.039). However, four patients in the CSI group have survived more than 5 years after CS. CS may be a promising treatment strategy for some GC patients with PM who have responded to chemotherapy.

Determination of erythrocyte Glutathione S-Transferase activity in individuals with gastric and colon cancer

Glutathione-S-Transferase (GST) in human cells has great importance in the detoxification mechanism of carcinogenic chemicals. Therefore, (GST) may be a useful tumor marker. This study examines whether GST activity in Gastric cancer (GC) and Colon Cancer (CC) is a helpful marker in diagnosing and monitoring the disease course. GST activity was investigated in patients with CC and GC and healthy individuals. Erythrocyte isolation was performed in 3 ml blood samples from volunteers aged 18-75 years. Hemoglobin amounts were determined from the standard graph drawn by monitoring the conversion of methemoglobin to cyanmethemoglobin in the presence of cyanide at 540 nm. Glutathione S-transferase activity was determined by measuring the amount of enzyme that catalyzes 1 µmol of S-(2,4-dinitrophenyl) glutathione formed per minute using 1-Chloro-2,4-Dinitrobenzene. The mean values of GST activities of patients with CC and GC, respectively; (1.28 ± 0.23 U/gHb; 1.20 ± 0.30 U/gHb), were significantly higher when compared to the mean values of healthy individuals with GST activity (0.59 ± 0.13 U/gHb) (p &lt; 0.05). The GST activity of patients with colon cancer, measured as (1.56 ± 0.13 U/gHb) after chemotherapy, was significantly higher than before (1.09 ± 0.12 U/gHb) (p &lt; 0.05). GST activity measured as (1.53± 0.24 U/gHb) after chemotherapy in gastric cancer patients was significantly higher when compared to the value measured before chemotherapy (0.97± 0.12 U/gHb) (p &lt; 0.05). Our results show that the change in GST activity in CC and GC can be used as a biomarker to monitor the disease course and response to chemotherapy.

Efficacy of Traditional Chinese Medicine Combined with Chemotherapy in the Treatment of Gastric Cancer: A Meta-analysis.

Objective Meta-analysis was conducted to explore the effects of CM combined with chemotherapy on the effective rate and survival rate of gastric cancer patients. Methods Literature retrieval was performed in PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase, CENTRAL, and CNKI databases. The subject of the literature was to compare the efficacy of CM combined with chemotherapy and chemotherapy alone in patients with gastric cancer. According to the Cochrane manual, the risk of bias was assessed for inclusion in randomized controlled trials. The chi-square test was used for the heterogeneity test. Subgroup analysis and sensitivity analysis were used to explore the causes of heterogeneity. Funnel chart and Egger's test were used to assess publication bias. Results This study included 761 patients with gastric cancer from 10 literatures. The effective rate of chemotherapy in the CM combined group was higher than that in the chemotherapy alone group (odds ratio (OR) = 1.96, 95% confidence interval (CI) (1.39, 2.78), Z = 3.81, P = 0.0001), and there was no heterogeneity among studies (chi2 = 5.68, P = 0.68, I2 = 0%). There was no significant publication bias among all studies (P > 0.05). The one-year survival rate in the CM combined group was higher than that in the chemotherapy alone group (OR = 3.25, 95% CI (1.90, 5.54), Z = 4.32, P < 0.0001). There was no heterogeneity among studies (chi2 = 1.04, P = 0.79, I2 = 0%) and no significant publication bias among studies (P > 0.05). The 3-year survival rate of gastric cancer patients in the traditional Chinese medicine combination group was higher than that in the chemotherapy alone group (OR = 1.71, 95% CI (1.06, 2.78), Z = 2.18, P = 0.03). There was no heterogeneity among studies (chi2 = 2.18, P = 0.54, I2 = 0%), and there was no significant publication bias (P > 0.05). The incidence of nausea and vomiting after chemotherapy in gastric cancer patients in the Chinese medicine combination group was lower than that in the chemotherapy alone group (OR = 0.47, 95% CI (0.34, 0.64), Z = 4.80, P < 0.00001). There was no heterogeneity among studies (chi2 = 8.57, P = 0.48, I2 = 0%), and there was no significant publication bias (P > 0.05). Conclusion CM combined with chemotherapy can improve the effective rate and survival rate of gastric cancer and reduce the incidence of nausea and vomiting after chemotherapy. We recommend a large sample size, multicenter combined randomized controlled trial for validation.

Characteristics of gut microbiota in patients with gastric cancer by surgery, chemotherapy and lymph node metastasis.

Gastric cancer (GC) is a malignant gastrointestinal tumor that can result in high mortality. Surgery and chemotherapy are often used for the effective treatment of GC. In addition, lymph node metastasis is a significant factor affecting the therapy of GC. Current researches have revealed that gut microbiota has the potential as biomarkers to distinguish healthy people and GC patients. However, the relationship between surgery, chemotherapy, and lymph node metastasis is still unclear. In this study, 16S rRNA sequencing was used to investigate 157 GC fecal samples to identify the role of surgery, chemotherapy, and lymph node metastasis. Immunohistochemical analysis was used to value the expression of Ki67, HER2 in GC patient tissues. There exist some gut microbiotas which can distinguish surgery from non-surgery GC patients, including Enterococcus, Megasphaera, Corynebacterium, Roseburia, and Lachnospira. Differences between lymph node metastasis and chemotherapy in GC patients are not significant. Moreover, we found the abundance of Blautia, Ruminococcus, Oscillospirawere related to the expression of Ki67 and the abundance of Prevotella, Lachnospira, Eubacterium, Desulfovibirowere correlated with the expression of HER2. The choice of treatment has a certain impact on the intestinal flora of patients with gastric cancer. Our research shows that surgery has a great effect on the intestinal flora of patients with gastric cancer. However, there were no significant differences in the characteristics of intestinal flora in patients with gastric cancer whether they received chemotherapy or whether they had lymph node metastasis. In addition, the association of gut microbiota with Ki67 and HER2 indicators is expected to provide the possibility of gut microbiota as a tumor prognostic marker.

Efficacy of AS versus SOX regimen as first-line chemotherapy for gastric cancer patients with peritoneal metastasis: a real-world study

BackgroundTo compare the prognosis of first-line systemic chemotherapy of AS (Albumin-bound paclitaxel and S-1) versus SOX (S-1 and oxaliplatin) regimen in Chinese gastric cancer patients with peritoneal metastasis.MethodsThis was a real-world study of gastric cancer patients with peritoneal metastasis who have been treated with AS or SOX regimen as first-line chemotherapy. Patients were matched by the method of propensity score matching (PSM). The primary and secondary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and progress-free survival (PFS).ResultsA total of 108 gastric cancer patients with peritoneal metastasis were enrolled after PSM analysis. There was no significant difference between AS and SOX regimen based on gender, age, ascites, treatment cycles, gastric cancer resection, received checkpoint inhibitors, and HER-2 expression after PSM analysis. The median OS (14.13 vs. 11.17 months, p = 0.0356) and median PFS (10.30 vs. 6.70 months, p = 0.0003) of patients who received AS regimen were longer than those treated by SOX regimen as first-line systemic chemotherapy. In sub-group analysis, the median OS and median PFS were longer for patients in AS regimen than SOX regimen in Lauren diffuse type. The occurrence of toxicity between the two groups was shown no significant difference.ConclusionsThe results verified that AS regimen was more effective than SOX chemotherapy in gastric cancer patients with peritoneal metastasis, especially in Lauren diffuse type.

P-270 Updated results of Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology gastric cancer cohort: Indirect comparison between adjuvant chemoradiation and perioperative chemotherapy in gastric cancer patients

Gastric cancer is associated with poor prognosis. Curative resection alone leads to a dismal outcome of gastric and GEJ adenocarcinoma. In the western gastric cancer patients are either treated with peri-operative chemotherapy or adjuvant chemoradiation. No direct comparisons of these two treatment strategies are available. In our referral gastric cancer center (NIO-PIB) we have changed in January 2013 the treatment protocol from adjuvant chemoradiation (like in INT-0116 study) to perioperative chemotherapy (ECF or CF regimen).

Can We Reboot the Role of Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy in the Treatment for Gastric Cancer with Peritoneal Carcinomatosis?: A Retrospective Cohort Study Regarding Minimally Invasive Surgery Conjoined with Intraperitoneal plus Systemic Chemotherapy.

Simple SummaryThe prognosis of gastric cancer (GC) patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) remains poor, in spite of the recent evolution of systemic chemotherapy for patients with GC. Nowadays, as intraperitoneal (IP) chemotherapy has been applied in the treatment for GC patients with PC, several promising data have been suggested. Inspired by the known characteristics of minimally invasive surgery (MIS), we have recently applied MIS concept in IP and systemic chemotherapy for GC patients with PC. We retrospectively compared the clinical outcomes between the patients underwent MIS conjoined IP plus systemic chemotherapy and patients underwent systemic chemotherapy only, to show the promising potential of the new treatment strategy combining MIS concept with IP plus systemic chemotherapy for GC patients with PC.Background: Peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) is the most common form of metastasis in gastric cancer (GC) and is related with a poor prognosis. Several treatment modalities including systemic chemotherapy and intraperitoneal chemotherapy have been studied and adopted in treatment of GC patients with PC. Nevertheless, few studies have reported the comparison of the oncologic outcomes between minimally invasive surgery (MIS) with intraperitoneal (IP) chemotherapy and conventional chemotherapy for GC with PC. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the clinical records of 74 patients who had been diagnosed as GC with PC via either intra-abdominal exploration or abdominopelvic computed tomography between January 2011 and April 2021. After performing propensity score-matching for this retrospective data, we compared the outcomes of 26 patients who underwent MIS followed by IP combined systemic chemotherapy (MIS-IP group) and 26 patients who underwent systemic chemotherapy only (SC-only group). Results: The 2-year progression free survival rate of the MIS-IP group was significantly higher than the SC-only groups (36.4% and 10.5%, respectively; p = 0.010). In multivariate analysis to detect relevant factors on PFS, IP chemotherapy (HR 0.213; p < 0.001), Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (HR 3.689; p = 0.002), and the amount of ascites (p = 0.011) were significant prognostic factors. Conclusions: This study demonstrated the therapeutic potential of MIS conjoined IP plus systemic chemotherapy for GC patients with PC. MIS conjoined by IP plus systemic chemotherapy can be adopted as a treatment option to reboot the role of IP chemotherapy in GC patients with PC.

A risk model based on autophagy-related lncRNAs for predicting prognosis and efficacy of immunotherapy and chemotherapy in gastric cancer patients.

Long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) are a class of non-protein-coding RNAs essential to the occurrence and development of gastric cancer (GC). We aimed to identify critical lncRNA pairs to construct a prognostic model and assess its performances in prognosis and efficacy prediction in GC patients receiving immunotherapy and chemotherapy. We searched transcriptome and clinical data of GC patients from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database. Autophagy-related lncRNAs were identified using co-expression network analysis, and lncRNA pairs with prognostic value were selected using pairwise transcriptome analysis. The gene pairs were subjected to LASSO algorithm for identification of optimal gene pairs for risk model construction. Patients were classified into the low-risk and high-risk groups with the RiskScore as a cutoff. Finally, 9 optimal gene pairs were identified in the LASSO algorithm model for construction of a lncRNA prognostic risk model. For predictive performances, it successfully predicted a shorter survival of high-risk patients than that obtained in low-risk individuals (P < 0.001). It showed moderate AUC (area under the curve) values for 1-, 2-, and 3-year overall survival prediction of 0.713 and could serve as an independent predictor for GC prognosis. Compared to the low-risk group, high-risk patients had higher expressions of marker genes for immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and showed higher sensitivity to the chemotherapy agents, rapamycin, bexarotene, and bicalutamide. Our findings demonstrate a robust prognostic model based on nine autophagy-related lncRNA pairs for GC. It acts as an independent predictor for survival and efficacy prediction of immunotherapy and chemotherapy in GC patients.

Adjuvant Chemotherapy for Gastric Cancer Patients with Mismatch Repair Deficiency or Microsatellite Instability: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Mismatch repair-deficient (dMMR) or microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) status serves as a predictor of a poor response to adjuvant chemotherapy among stage 2 colon cancer patients. This study aimed to investigate the efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy in dMMR/MSI-H gastric cancer (GC). Clinical studies comparing adjuvant chemotherapy and surgery alone in dMMR/MSI-H GCs through June 2021 were retrieved to assess the survival of patients managed with both treatments. Two approaches were used to pool the hazard ratio (HR) of survival: (1) if Kaplan-Meier curves and number of patients at risk were provided, individual patient data were extracted. Cox models were used to calculate the HR with its 95% confidence interval (CI); (2) for study-level data, pooled HR was estimated using fixed/random-effects models. Seven clinical studies were assessed. For dMMR/MSI-H versus mismatch repair-proficient (pMMR)/microsatellite stable (MSS)/microsatellite instability-low (MSI-L) status, the estimated 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) rate was 74.2% versus 51.5% (HR, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.32-0.62; P < 0.001) and the estimated 5-year OS rate was 60.5% versus 49.1% (HR, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.60-0.85; P < 0.001). The study-level data showed pooled HRs of 0.42 for DFS (95% CI, 0.31-0.57; P < 0.001) and 0.65 for OS (95% CI, 0.38-1.11; P = 0.114). For adjuvant chemotherapy versus observation of dMMR/MSI-H, the estimated 5-year DFS rate was 76.1% versus 73.3% (HR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.45-1.15; P = 0.171) and the estimated 5-year OS rate was 73.5% versus 59.7% (HR, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.46-0.83; P = 0.001). Significant survival differences also were observed at study level. The study findings confirm the benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy for dMMR/MSI-H GC patients.

Acupuncture for Quality of Life in Gastric Cancer Patients Undergoing Adjuvant Chemotherapy

ContextPatients with gastric cancer experience health-related quality of life (HRQOL) decline during adjuvant chemotherapy following gastrectomy. ObjectivesThis pilot study aimed to evaluate the preliminary effect and feasibility of electro-acupuncture (EA) for HRQOL and symptom burden in these patients. MethodsIn this open-label, multicenter, parallel controlled trial, gastric cancer patients who planned to receive adjuvant chemotherapy were randomly assigned to receive high-dose EA (seven times each chemotherapy cycle for three cycles), low-dose EA (three times each chemotherapy cycle), or usual care only. The acupoints prescription consisted of bilateral ST36, PC6, SP4, and DU20, EX-HN3, and selected Back-shu points. Patients completed the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Gastric (FACT-Ga) weekly, and the Edmonton Symptom Assessment System (ESAS). The primary outcome was the difference among the groups on the gastric cancer subscale (GaCS) of the FACT-Ga. ResultsOf the 66 randomized patients, 58 were analyzed according to intention-to-treat principle, and 45 were in the per-protocol set (PPS). The average scores in PPS of GaCS were 52.12±9.71, 51.85±12.36, and 45.37±8.61 in high-dose EA, low-dose EA, and control groups, respectively. EA was significantly associated with improved average GaCS scores when compared with control group (51.98±10.91 vs. 45.37±8.61, P = 0.039). EA treatment also produced ESAS relief at the end of intervention (14.36 ± 12.28 vs. 23.91 ± 15.52, P = 0.027). Participants in EA groups had fewer grade ≥3 leukopenia (0% vs. 15.79%, P = 0.031) and neutropenia (2.56% vs. 26.31%, P = 0.012). ConclusionEA showed promising effects in improving HRQOL, controlling symptom burden, and reducing toxicity during adjuvant chemotherapy in gastric cancer patients. Future adequately powered trials are feasible and needed to confirm the specific effect of EA.

Establishment of an Immune Cell Infiltration Score to Help Predict the Prognosis and Chemotherapy Responsiveness of Gastric Cancer Patients.

The immune microenvironment plays a critical role in tumor biology. The molecular profiles of immune components and related genes are of tremendous value for the study of primary resistance to immune checkpoint blockers (ICBs) for gastric cancer (GC) and serve as prognostic biomarkers to predict GC survival. Recent studies have revealed that tumor immune cell infiltration (ICI) is an indicator of the survival and responsiveness to chemotherapy in GC patients. Here, we describe the immune cell landscape based on the ESTIMATE and CIBERSORT algorithms to help separate GC into 3 ICI clusters using the unsupervised clustering method. Further in-depth analyses, such as differential expression gene (DEG) analysis and principal component analysis (PCA), help to establish an ICI scoring system. A low ICI score is characterized by an increased tumor mutation burden (TMB). The combination of the ICI score and TMB score better predicts the survival of GC patients. Analyses based on public and our own database revealed that the ICI scoring system could also help predict the survival and chemotherapy responsiveness of GC patients. The present study demonstrated that the ICI score may be an effective prognostic biomarker and predictive indicator for chemotherapy and immunotherapy.

Adjuvant chemotherapy for gastric cancer patients with mismatch repair deficiency or microsatellite instability.

e16004 Background: Mismatch repair deficient (dMMR) or microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) serves as a predictor poor response to adjuvant chemotherapy in stage II colon cancer patients. Our objective was to investigate the efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy in dMMR/MSI-H gastric cancer (GC). Methods: We searched literatures through December, 2020 to identify clinical studies that reported survival comparing adjuvant chemotherapy with surgery alone in dMMR/MSI-H GCs. Two approaches were used to pool the hazard ratio (HR) of survival: (1) If Kaplan-Meier curves and number at risk were provided, individual patient data were extracted. Cox models were used to calculate the HR with 95% confidence interval (CI); (2) for study-level data, pooled HR was estimated using fixed/random-effects models. Results: Six clinical studies were identified. For dMMR/MSI-H versus mismatch repair proficient (pMMR)/microsatellite stable (MSS)/microsatellite instability-low (MSI-L), the estimated 5-years DFS were 74.2% versus 51.5% (HR, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.32-0.62; P &lt; 0.001); the estimated 5-years OS were 60.8% versus 50.1% (HR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.60-0.88; P = 0.001). At study-level data, the pooled HRs were 0.42 for DFS (95% CI, 0.31-0.57; P &lt; 0.001) and 0.66 for OS (95% CI, 0.32-1.38; P = 0.268). For adjuvant chemotherapy versus observation in dMMR/MSI-H, the estimated 5-years DFS were 76.1% versus 73.3% (HR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.45-1.15; P = 0.171); the estimated 5-years OS were 74.9% versus 60.2% (HR, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.44-0.83; P = 0.001). Significant survival differences were also observed at study-level. Conclusions: This study further suggested adjuvant chemotherapy could be beneficial even in dMMR/MSI-H GC patients.

Machine-learning model derived gene signature predictive of paclitaxel survival benefit in gastric cancer: results from the randomised phase III SAMIT trial

ObjectiveTo date, there are no predictive biomarkers to guide selection of patients with gastric cancer (GC) who benefit from paclitaxel. Stomach cancer Adjuvant Multi-Institutional group Trial (SAMIT) was a 2×2...