Chemotherapy In First-line Treatment Research Articles

Effects of sintilimab plus chemotherapy as first-line treatment on health-related quality of life in patients with advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma: results from the randomized phase 3 ORIENT-15 study

In ORIENT-15 study, sintilimab plus chemotherapy demonstrated significant improvement on overall survival (OS) versus placebo plus chemotherapy in first-line treatment of advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). Here, we report effect of sintilimab plus chemotherapy on health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in patients with advanced ESCC. From December 14, 2018 to August 28, 2022, HRQoL was evaluated in all randomized patients using European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire Core 30 items (QLQ-C30), EORTC Quality of Life Questionnaire Oesophageal Cancer Module 18 items (QLQ-OES18), and visual analogue scale (VAS) of the EuroQol five-dimensional five-level questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L). Mean scores of each scale were described by treatment group through week 60. Least-squares mean (LSM) score change from baseline through week 24 were analyzed using the mixed-model repeated-measures method. Time to the first onset of deterioration (TTD) and OS for each scale were estimated. Clinical Trials Registration: NCT03748134. As of August 28, 2022, 689 of 690 enrolled patients were assessed for HRQoL analysis (sintilimab group: 340, placebo group: 349). Median follow-up was 32.2 months. Differences in LSM favored sintilimab over placebo for QLQ-C30 social functioning (LSM difference: 3.06, 95% CI: 0.55 to 5.57; P=0.0170), pain (-2.24, 95% CI:-4.30 to-0.17; P=0.0337), fatigue (-2.24, 95% CI:-4.46 to-0.02; P=0.0479), constipation (-3.27, 95% CI-5.49 to-1.05; P=0.0039), QLQ-OES18 pain (-1.77, 95% CI-3.11 to-0.43; P=0.0097), trouble swallowing saliva (-2.09, 95% CI:-3.77 to-0.42; P=0.0146), and choked when swallowing (-3.23, 95% CI:-5.60 to-0.86; P=0.0076). TTD favored sintilimab over placebo for QLQ-OES18 dysphagia (Hazard ratio [HR]: 0.76, 95% CI: 0.61-0.94, P=0.0104), and trouble swallowing saliva (HR: 0.48, 95% CI: 0.35-0.67, P<0.0001). Improved OS were observed in patients with better performance in several functioning and symptom scales of QLQ-C30 and QLQ-QES18. The statistically significant differences of several HRQoL scales and improvements in delayed deterioration observed in our study further support the use of sintilimab plus chemotherapy as first-line treatment for advanced ESCC. This study was funded by Innovent Biologics and was co-funded by Eli Lilly.

Metformin as an Enhancer for the Treatment of Chemoresistant CD34+ Acute Myeloid Leukemia Cells.

Acute myeloid leukemia is the second most frequent type of leukemia in adults. Due to a high risk of development of chemoresistance to first-line chemotherapy, the survival rate of patients in a 5-year period is below 30%. One of the reasons is that the AML population is heterogeneous, with cell populations partly composed of very primitive CD34+CD38- hematopoietic stem/progenitor cells, which are often resistant to chemotherapy. First-line treatment with cytarabine and idarubicin fails to inhibit the proliferation of CD34+CD38- cells. In this study, we investigated Metformin's effect with or without first-line conventional chemotherapy, or with other drugs like venetoclax and S63845, on primitive and undifferentiated CD34+ AML cells in order to explore the potential of Metformin or S63845 to serve as adjuvant therapy for AML. We found that first-line conventional chemotherapy treatment inhibited the growth of cells and arrested the cells in the S phase of the cell cycle; however, metformin affected the accumulation of cells in the G2/M phase. We observed that CD34+ KG1a cells respond better to lower doses of cytarabine or idarubicin in combination with metformin. Also, we determined that treatment with cytarabine, venetoclax, and S63845 downregulated the strong tendency of CD34+ KG1a cells to form cell aggregates in culture due to the downregulation of leukemic stem cell markers like CD34 and CD44, as well as adhesion markers. Also, we found that idarubicin slightly upregulated myeloid differentiation markers, CD11b and CD14. Treatment with cytarabine, idarubicin, venetoclax, metformin, and S63845 upregulated some cell surface markers like HLA-DR expression, and metformin upregulated CD9, CD31, and CD105 cell surface marker expression. In conclusion, we believe that metformin has the potential to be used as an adjuvant in the treatment of resistant-to-first-line-chemotherapy AML cells. Also, we believe that the results of our study will stimulate further research and the potential use of changes in the expression of cell surface markers in the development of new therapeutic strategies.

Fisetin and/or capecitabine causes changes in apoptosis pathways in capecitabine-resistant colorectal cancer cell lines.

Capecitabine is recommended as one of the first-line chemotherapy treatments for advanced or metastatic colorectal cancer. Researches have been conducted on capecitabine's impact on the viability of human colon cancer cells and its potential to induce apoptosis. However, even in cases initially responsive to treatment, the development of acquired resistance significantly limits its efficacy. Challenges still exist in effectively treating patients with chemotherapy, and developing new cytotoxic drugs is hindered by drug resistance. Fisetin alters the cell cycle, inducing apoptosis, inhibiting cancer cell proliferation, and enhancing the therapeutic effectiveness of chemotherapy drugs. This work aims to create a plan for reversing capecitabine resistance. For this purpose, the role of capecitabine and/or fisetin combinations in cell proliferation and apoptosis has been determined in both wild-type and capecitabine-resistant HT29 cells (CR/HT29). We developed capecitabine-resistant cell line from wild-type HT29 cells. This study demonstrated the effects of capecitabine, fisetin, and their combinations on both resistant and wild-type cells through experiments including cell survival skills, cell proliferation, wound healing, colony formation, hoechst staining, and western blot analysis.We established capecitabine-resistant cell lines. P-gp expression increased in CR/HT29 cells. Capecitabine effects on a CR/HT29 cells less than wild-type HT29 cells. The combination of fisetin and capecitabine in cell proliferation caused greater reductions in wild-type HT29 cells than in capecitabine-resistant cells. Fisetin has also additive effects on the apoptotic pathway in CR/HT29 cells.This study provides new perspectives on the combination of capecitabine and/or flavonoid treatment in resistant cells.

Chemotherapy, immunotherapy, or combination first-line treatment for metastatic urothelial carcinoma of the bladder: A large real-world experience

IntroductionFirst-line systemic therapy for metastatic urothelial carcinoma of the bladder (mUC) consists of platinum-based chemotherapy in most patients and PD1/L1 inhibitors in selected patients. Multiple combination chemoimmunotherapy trials failed to show a clear benefit over chemotherapy alone. We used real-world data to evaluate clinical and sociodemographic factors associated with receipt of first-line chemotherapy, immunotherapy, or combination chemoimmunotherapy treatment for metastatic bladder cancer and examined differences in overall survival (OS). Materials and MethodsWe used the National Cancer Database to identify patients with stage IV mUC diagnosed between 2014 and 2018, who were treated with first-line immunotherapy, chemotherapy, or combination treatment. We performed multivariable logistic regression modeling to determine factors associated with treatment receipt Adjusted Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression were used to evaluate the association between treatment and OS. ResultsIn our cohort of 4,169 patients, multivariable analysis identified increasing age (RRR: 1.07, 95%CI, 1.06–1.08) and comorbidity burden (, as independent predictors of receiving immunotherapy. Treatment at an academic facility was associated with increased likelihood of combination treatment (RRR: 1.29, 95%CI, 1.01–1.65). After IPTW, we found that combination therapy (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.72; 95%CI, 0.62–0.83) was associated with improved survival compared to chemotherapy. ConclusionsPatients with older age and more comorbidities were more likely to receive immunotherapy than chemotherapy for first-line treatment of metastatic urothelial carcinoma of the bladder. Utilization of chemoimmunotherapy was observed to be higher in academic centers and was associated with improved survival compared to chemotherapy.

Prognostic impact of age in advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients undergoing first-line checkpoint inhibitor immunotherapy and chemotherapy treatment

BackgroundResearch on the association between age and clinical outcome in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) treated with immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy as first-line setting is limited. The aim of study is to determine the influence of age on the progress-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) in those patients after adjusting for potential confounders. MethodsA total of 207 advanced NSCLC patients treated with immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy in the first-line treatment in Guangxi Medical University Cancer Hospital from March 10, 2019, to December 31, 2022, was retrospectively analyzed. χ2 (categorical variables) was used to analyze the differences among the different age groups. Cox regression and Kaplan–Meier analyses were used to assess the association between age and clinical outcomes. P values < 0.05 (two-sided) were considered statistically significant. ResultsThe mean age of the cohort was 58.8 ± 10.3 years. The percentages of patients < 65, 65–69, 70–74, and ≥ 75 years were 66.7 %, 19.3 %, 9.2 % and 4.8 %, respectively. Compared to the aged < 65 years group, the HR for the risk of disease progression for each group are 0.67 (95 %CI = 0.40–1.12, P = 0.125), 0.66 (95 %CI = 0.31, 1.43, P = 0.298), and 2.27 (95 %CI = 0.80, 6.45, P = 0.124), respectively, with no significant differences in the results. And the HR for risk of death for the 65–69 years and 70–74 years groups was 1.16 (95 %CI = 0.64–2.08, P = 0.628) and 0.93 (95 %CI = 0.39–2.23, P = 0.879), respectively. The difference has no statistical significance. Whereas in patients aged ≥ 75, there is an increased risk of death after adjusted confounders with HR = 4.83 (95 %CI = 2.06–11.35). The difference was statistically significant (P < 0.001). Trend test indicates that with advancing age, the patient's risk of death increases (HR = 1.33, 95 % CI = 1.02–1.75, P = 0.034). ConclusionAge may not be the primary factor influencing the efficacy of immunotherapy combined with chemotherapy, but particular attention should be given to the elderly population.

Abstract 4911: PAIRWISE: Deep learning-powered personalized medicine approach identifies actionable drug combinations in B cell lymphoma

Abstract Combination drug therapies offer promise for improving cancer treatment. However, identifying actionable drug combinations for specific cancer subtypes and individual patients remains challenging due to the vast number of possibilities. Existing approaches like high-throughput screening (HTS) and rule-based drug additions have limitations in their ability to predict clinically translatable synergistic combinations. Therefore, advanced machine learning focused on patient-centric modelling have the potential to optimize combination therapies. PAIRWISE is a patient-centric deep learning-powered drug combination recommendation platform. Given gene expression along with chemical structures and targets from a set of two drugs being applied, the output is the binary combination outcome. PAIRWISE introduces a new approach of representing tumor genomics using the unsupervised pretraining design on 11K TCGA tumors. The power of PAIRWISE is derived from knowledge-guided transfer learning by learning from in vitro experiments with drug-drug-cell interactions and cellular heterogeneity. PAIRWISE can accurately predict combination synergy with area under the curve (AUC) &amp;gt; 0.85 across 10 tissue types in a large dataset of 200K in vitro drug combinations and significantly outperform all state-of-the-art methods. Diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is the most common B cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma and remains incurable in around 40% of patients. Finding optimal combination therapy for each DLBCL patient is a critical unmet need. As independent validation, we applied PAIRWISE to an external HTS study of Bruton Tyrosine Kinase inhibitor (BTKi) combinations (Griner et al., 2014), confirming the reproducibility and accuracy of high-confidence predictions (AUC = 0.72). PAIRWISE was also applied to transcriptomic data of 29 DLBCL cell lines (Bal et al., 2022) and predicted BTKi-containing combinations across ABC subtypes with higher synergy scores than GCB (P = 0.02). This is consistent with expected better overall efficacy of BTK inhibitors in ABC subtype (Younes et al., 2019; Davis et al., 2010; Wilson et al., 2015). To predict opportunities in DLBCL, PAIRWISE was used to identify BTKi partners for an additional 211 anti-cancer drugs using 562 published ex vivo DLBCL samples (Schmitz et al., 2018). PAIRWISE effectively identified novel DLBCL sub-population with significantly higher response scores for predicted BTKi combinations and favorable survival. Notably, patients predicted as responsive had significantly better outcomes upon first-line chemotherapy treatments than non-responsive ones (P &amp;lt; 0.0001). Collectively, we demonstrate that PAIRWISE is a highly efficient and generalizable framework that enables confident predictions of pairwise drug combinations at disease subtype level, with the potential of informing treatment options and clinical trial design. Citation Format: Chengqi Xu, Jake Cohen-Setton, Zhouyang Shen, Marta Milo, Ilkay US, Ben Sidders, Jude Fitzgibbon, Heng Pan, Olivier Elemento, Krishna Bulusu. PAIRWISE: Deep learning-powered personalized medicine approach identifies actionable drug combinations in B cell lymphoma [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2024; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2024 Apr 5-10; San Diego, CA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2024;84(6_Suppl):Abstract nr 4911.

Concomitant Immunotherapy and Metastasis-Directed Radiotherapy in Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma: A Biomarker-Driven, Original, Case-Based Proof-of-Concept Study.

Metastatic upper tract urothelial carcinoma (mUTUC) has a poor prognosis. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have demonstrated efficacy in patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma. However, data supporting the use of ICIs in patients with mUTUC are limited. A promising synergy between ICI and concomitant radiotherapy (RT) has been reported in patients with mUTUC. Our research involved a case-based investigation and emphasized the successful integration of different specialists' skills. Observed after partial urethrectomy procedures for muscle-invasive upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC), the radiological detection of lung metastases prompted us to implement cisplatin-based first-line chemotherapy and molecular characterization in the treatment process. We uncovered alterations in the ERBB2 and FGFR3 genes and mismatch repair deficiency at a molecular level. First-line chemotherapy treatment led to a stable disease, and the patient was started on maintenance immunotherapy with Avelumab. Subsequently, an increase in the size of the lung nodules was described, and the patient received radiotherapy for three lung lesions in combination with immunotherapy. After 3 months, a restaging CT scan reported a complete response, which is still ongoing. We discuss the mechanisms driving RT/ICI synergy and the molecular profile of mUTUC as factors that should be considered in therapeutic strategy planning. Molecular insight enhances the originality of our study, providing a nuanced understanding of the genetic landscape of mUTUC and paving the way for targeted therapeutic strategies. The therapeutic armamentarium expansion encourages the design of a multimodal and personalized approach for each mUTUC patient, taking into account tumor heterogeneity and molecular profiling.

1507TiP Phase Ib multicenter study of trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) and immunotherapy with or without chemotherapy in first-line treatment of patients (pts) with advanced or metastatic nonsquamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and HER2 overexpression (OE): DESTINY-Lung03

1507TiP Phase Ib multicenter study of trastuzumab deruxtecan (T-DXd) and immunotherapy with or without chemotherapy in first-line treatment of patients (pts) with advanced or metastatic nonsquamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and HER2 overexpression (OE): DESTINY-Lung03

The Effect of Chemotherapeutic Agents on Survival in Metastatic Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer with KRAS Mutation

Abstract Introduction KRAS mutation is observed in up to 30% of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) cases and is corelated with a poor prognosis. In the cases with KRAS p.G12C mutation and first-line chemotherapy (± immunotherapy) resistance, a targeted drug option is available. Objectives Our study aimed to examine the correlation between first-line chemotherapy agents and treatment response in patients with KRAS-mutated metastatic NSCLC. Materials and Methods Retrospective database searches were performed on cases diagnosed with metastatic NSCLC at our center between January 2019 and December 2021 that were found to be KRAS mutation positive using the next-generation sequencing (NGS) approach. The cases were classified into five subgroups based on the chemotherapy regimens (platinum + gemcitabine, platinum + taxane, platinum + pemetrexed, platinum + vinorelbine, and others). The clinical and demographic data of 41 cases were analyzed retrospectively, and survival analyses were performed using the Kaplan–Meier method. Results Thirty-seven of 41 patients (90.2%) were males, and 27 (65.9%) had adenocarcinoma histology. The most prevalent mutation was KRAS G12C, with 12 cases (29.2%), followed by KRAS G12V, with 9 cases (21.9%). Other mutations were as follows: KRAS G12D 4 (9%), KRAS G13C 3 (7.3%), KRAS G12A 2 (4.8%), KRAS G12R 2 (4.8%), KRAS Q61H 2 (4.8%), KRAS Q61L 2 (4.8%), KRAS V14I 2 (4.8%), KRAS A146T 1 (2.4%), KRAS G13G 1 (2.4%), and KRAS G1C 1 (2.4%). The median progression-free survival (mPFS) for all groups was 4.6 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.7-6.5), and there were no statistically significant differences between the groups (p = 0.121). The median overall survival (mOS) for all groups was 9.3 months (95% CI: 3.8–14.5), and there were no statistically significant differences between the groups (p = 0.805). Conclusions OS and PFS analyses showed no differences between platinum + taxane, platin + pemetrexed, platinum + gemcitabine, and platin + vinorelbine used in first-line treatments for KRAS mutant NSCLC cases. We believe that patient-specific characteristics may be a determining factor in selecting chemotherapy for this patient population.

Anti-PD-1 Monoclonal Antibodies (mAbs) Are Superior to Anti-PD-L1 mAbs When Combined with Chemotherapy in First-Line Treatment for Metastatic Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (mNSCLC): A Network Meta-Analysis.

Platinum-based chemotherapy combined with anti-PD-1 or PD-L1 monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) is now standard first-line therapy for mNSCLC patients without sensitizing driver mutations. Anti-PD-1 and anti-PD-L1 mAbs are considered to be equivalent in efficacy. In the absence of head-to-head randomized control trials (RCTs), we utilized network meta-analysis (NWM) to provide an indirect comparison of their efficacy. A systematic literature review and NWM were performed using RCTs that investigated anti-PD-1 or PD-L1 mAbs ± chemotherapy in patients with mNSCLC in the first-line setting. The primary outcome was comparative overall survival (OS), while secondary outcomes were comparative progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), and rate of grade 3 and higher toxicities. We identified 24 RCTs. Patients treated with anti-PD-1 mAb + chemotherapy compared with anti-PD-L1 mAb + chemotherapy showed superior mOS, mPFS, and ORR with a similar rate of grade 3 and higher toxicities. This difference in mOS was most pronounced in the PD-L1 TPS 1-49% population. The two mAbs were equivalent as single agents. Anti-PD-1 mAb + chemotherapy improved mOS when compared to anti-PD-1 mAb monotherapy, whereas anti-PD-L1 mAbs + chemotherapy did not when compared to anti-PD-L1 mAb monotherapy. Head-to-head RCTs are warranted in the future.

Real-world outcomes of immunotherapy with or without chemotherapy in first-line treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer.

Immunotherapy alone (mono-IT) or combined with chemotherapy (chemo-IT) has recently become the cornerstone of first-line treatment for advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. Here, real-world outcomes of first-line mono-IT and chemo-IT of advanced NSCLC treated within routine clinical practice at a single academic center in the Central Eastern European (CEE) region are presented. A total of 176 consecutive patients with advanced NSCLC treated with mono-IT (118 patients) or chemo-IT (58 patients) were included. At the participating institution, all medical data relevant for providing oncology care are collected prospectively and in a standardized manner using purposely created pro-forms. Adverse events (AEs) were recorded and graded according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE). The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate median overall survival (mOS) and median duration of treatment (mDOT). The 118 patients in the mono-IT cohort had a median age of 64 years, most were male (59%), 20% had ECOG PS ≥2, and 14% had controlled CNS metastases at baseline. With a median follow-up time (mFU) of 24.1 months, the mOS was 19.4 months (95% CI, 11.1-27.6), and the mDOT was 5.0 months (95% CI, 3.5-6.5). The 1-year OS was 62%. The 58 patients in the chemo-IT cohort had a median age of 64 years, most were male (64%), 9% had ECOG PS ≥2, and 7% had controlled CNS metastases at baseline. With a mFU of 15.5 months, the mOS was 21.3 months (95% CI, 15.9-26.7), and the mDOT was 12.0 months (95% CI, 8.3-15.6). The 1-year OS was 75%. Adverse events of severe grade were recorded in 18% and 26% of patients, and immunotherapy discontinuation due to AEs occurred in 19% and 9% in the mono-IT and chemo-IT groups, respectively. No treatment-related deaths were recorded. The results from the present real-world observational study from a CEE country suggest similar effectiveness and safety of first-line mono-IT and chemo-IT in patients with advanced NSCLC to those observed in randomized clinical trials. However, continuous follow-up will offer better insight into the magnitude of long-term benefits in routine clinical practice.

Phase II results of ivonescimab (AK112/ SMT112), a novel PD-1/VEGF bispecific, in combination with chemotherapy for first line treatment of advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) without actionable genomic alterations (AGA) in EGFR/ALK.

9087 Background: Since the initial approval of bevacizumab (bev) with chemo in NSCLC, the subsequent focus of bev use in combination with PD1 therapy for first line metastatic disease has largely focused on non-squamous (non-SCC) histology. Ivonescimab is a novel anti-PD-1/VEGF bispecific antibody. The bispecific approach to these targets has the potential to recalibrate the malignant immuno-architecture in favor of a more immune-responsive and anti-tumor microenvironment. Cooperative VEGF binding with the bispecific has been shown to elevate affinity of ivonescimab to PD-1 by more than 10-fold. Ivonescimab has a mean T1/2 of 6-7 days while bev T1/2 is 20 days. Therefore, we aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of ivonescimab combined with chemotherapy for first line advanced or metastatic NSCLC in patients (pts) with squamous (SCC) or non-SCC NSCLC. Methods: An open-label, multi-center phase II study evaluating the efficacy and safety of ivonescimab combined with chemotherapy in pts with advanced or metastatic NSCLC. Pts were enrolled into 3 cohorts based on prior therapy and presence of AGA. Data from pts with prior therapy for advanced or metastatic disease were presented in ASCO 2022 and here we report additional pts and longer-term data from pts with NSCLC without AGA receiving first line therapy for advanced/metastatic disease. Pts were treated with 10 or 20 mg/kg ivonescimab once every 3wks combined with carboplatin and pemetrexed (non-SCC) or carboplatin and paclitaxel (SCC). The primary endpoint was ORR per RECIST by investigator. Results: 135 pts with advanced or metastatic NSCLC received ivonescimab plus chemotherapy including 63 with SCC and 72 with non-SCC. Median age was 61 yrs (. 78% male, 3% and 97% pts had ECOG PS 0 and 1, respectively, and 20% pts had baseline brain metastasis. Median follow-up was 11.5 mo. Pts with SCC experienced a 75% ORR with median DOR 15.4 mo, 95% DCR, the 9-mo PFS and OS rate was 67% and 93%, respectively. Pts with non-SCC experienced a 55% ORR, DOR was not reached, 100% DCR, the 9-mo PFS rate and OS rate was 61% and 81%, respectively. The most common treatment related adverse events (TRAEs)≥ 10% were epistaxis, proteinuria, rash, amylase increased, anemia, ALT increased, infusion related reaction, AST increased, pruritus, decreased appetite, and WBC decreased. Grade ≥3 TRAEs occurred in 28.1% TRAE leading to discontinuation occurred in 6.7% of pts. Conclusions: Ivonescimab, plus chemotherapy has shown promising anti-tumor activity in pts with advanced/metastatic NSCLC without AGA and can be administered safely in combination with platinum doublet chemotherapy to patients with SCC and non-SCC histology. Clinical trial information: NCT04736823 .

BTK INHIBITORS IN CNSL AND HIGH‐RISK/REFRACTORY DLBCL PATIENTS: A REAL‐WORLD STUDY

Objective: The effectiveness and prognosis of a BTki-containing regimen in first-line treatment and relapsed/refractory patients were assessed in this study. Methods: There were 26 patients with DLBCL. BTKi was administered to patients with newly diagnosed, relapsed, refractory primary PCNSL and high-risk/refractory systemic DLBCL, and the effectiveness and PFS were evaluated. Results: The BTKi therapy study included 26 participants (16 PCNSL, 10 DLBCL). Among PCNSL,3 patients who had achieved PR following MTX-based first-line chemotherapy were given BTKi as a monotherapy for disease recurrence. BTKi patients lived for an average of 5 (1–8) months before dying from disease progression, which is 5 months longer than the typical patient survival period following chemotherapy recurrence. After three rounds of MTX-based chemotherapy, none of the six patients with refractory PCNSL achieved PR. After BTKi was utilized as second-line therapy, the average survival time was increased by 12 (2–21) months. Three patients received early treatment, while the remaining three received BTKi after the third round of medicine. Early patients had a longer average survival period than late ones (11 months vs. 10 months). The remaining seven high-risk patients received first-line chemotherapy and BTKi treatment. The median follow-up duration was 5 months, the ORR was 100%, and neither the median PFS nor the median OS were achieved. The mean maintenance time was 8 months. Among 10 patients with DLBCL, 8 of them are high risk group, and 2 had refractory disease. When the disease of two SCNSL patients advanced, BTKi was used in conjunction with chemotherapy as a salvage treatment, and BTKi was kept up for an average of 5 months. The efficacy was evaluated as PD. The ORR was 80% (4/5, 1 case was not assessed) and CR rate was 100% in high risk group. Four of these CNS-IPI high-risk DLBCL patients had adrenal involvement and a high IPI score, with BTKi maintained for an average of 6 months, two of them achieved CR, one of PD, and 1 case was not evaluated. The efficacy evaluation was CR in the other two high-risk CD5+ patients, whose BTKi was sustained for 12 months and 6 months, respectively. After receiving standard chemotherapy, the remaining 2 refractory patients kept getting worse. One patient with hepatitis B cirrhosis had elevated AST and ALT levels after one course of medication, so BTKi was stopped. The other patient was kept on BTKi alone for 4 months, but the efficacy was still PD. Patients with PCNSL have a dismal prognosis, in particular, the average survival time for R/R patients is less than two months. The research was funded by: National Natural Science Foundation of China (8226010026), Natural Science Foundation of Gansu Province (22JR11RA053) Keywords: aggressive B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma, molecular targeted therapies, combination therapies No conflicts of interests pertinent to the abstract.

Psycho-emotional well-being of non-hodgkin lymphoma patients

The given study focuses on the evaluation of the psycho-emotional well-being of patients with non-Hodgkin’s lymphomas (NHL) according to age, gender, living environment, morphological subtype, stage, primary tumor focus, Charlson comorbiditiesindex, and completion of first-line chemotherapy treatment. To carry out the study, a number of 126 patients aged between 18 and 78 years, included in the treatment and monitored in the Department of Hematology, IMSP Oncological Institute, during the years 2020-2022, were selected. The Global Well Being (GWB) score was used to test the proposed hypotheses. The results illustrate statistically significant correlations between GWB score and gender, living environment, extranodal onset, and treatment period. The lack of statistically significant correlations was appreciated between the GWB score and age, disease stage, comorbidities.

Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Monoclonal Antibodies Associated With Chemotherapy in First-Line Treatment of Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

ObjectivesThis study aimed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of anti–epidermal growth factor receptor (cetuximab and panitumumab) or anti–vascular endothelial growth factor (bevacizumab) monoclonal antibodies associated with conventional chemotherapy (CT) (fluorouracil and leucovorin with irinotecan) as a first-line treatment for unresectable metastatic colorectal cancer. MethodsA partitioned survival analysis model was adopted to simulate direct health costs and benefits comparing therapeutic options in a 10 years’ time horizon. Model data were extracted from the literature and costs were obtained from Brazilian official government databases. The analysis considered the perspective of the Brazilian Public Health System; costs were measured in local currency (BRL) and benefits in quality-adjusted life-years (QALY). A 5% discount rate was applied to costs and benefits. Alternative willingness-to-pay scenarios, varying from 3 to 5 times the cost-effectiveness threshold established in Brazil, were estimated. The results were presented incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER), and both deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed. ResultsThe most cost-effective choice would be the association of CT with panitumumab, with an ICER of $58 330.15/QALY compared with isolated CT. The second-best option was CT with bevacizumab and panitumumab, with an ICER of $71 195.40/QALY compared with panitumumab alone. Although having higher costs, the second-best option was the most effective. Both strategies were cost-effective in part of the Monte Carlo iterations, considering the 3× threshold. ConclusionsThe therapeutic option CT + panitumumab + bevacizumab represents the most significant effectiveness gain in our study. It is the second-lowest cost-effectiveness, and this option includes monoclonal antibodies association for patients with and without KRAS mutation.

Real-world outcomes of first-line chemotherapy for unresectable stage III and IV bladder cancer.

For many malignancies, considerable divergence between the efficacy found in clinical trials and effectiveness in routine practice have been reported (efficacy-effectiveness gap). The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy-effectiveness gap in palliative first-line (1L) chemotherapy treatment (CTx) for urothelial carcinoma of the bladder. From seven Dutch teaching hospitals, all patients diagnosed with unresectable stage III (cT2-4aN1-3M0) and IV (cT4b and/or cM1) disease, who received 1L-CTx (for both primary as recurrent disease after radical cystectomy) between 2008 and 2016, were captured. Results were compared with data from seven randomised trials that investigated 1L gemcitabine + cisplatin (GemCis) and/or gemcitabine + carboplatin (GemCarbo). Of the 835 included patients, 191 received 1L-CTx. Median overall survival (mOS) of GemCis patients (N = 88) was 10.4months [95% CI 7.9-13.0], which was shorter compared to clinical trial findings (range mOS: 12.7-14.3months) despite comparable clinical characteristics. The mOS of GemCarbo patients (N = 92) was 9.3months [95% CI 7.5-11.1]. Patients who received GemCarbo had worse prognostic characteristics (higher age, impaired renal function and worse performance status (all P-values < 0.001)) compared to GemCis patients, but were equal in occurrence of dose reductions (24.4% vs. 29.5%, P-value = 0.453), early termination (55.7% vs. 54.1%, P-value = 0.839), clinical best response (P-value = 0.733), and toxicity (68.1% vs. 63.3%, P-value = 0.743). In multivariable regression, GemCis was not superior to GemCarbo (HR 0.90 [95% CI 0.55-1.47], P-value = 0.674). There seems to be an efficacy-effectiveness gap in 1L GemCis treatment, despite patients having similar baseline characteristics. Early termination of treatment occurred more often and dose reduction less often compared to clinical trials, hinting towards abandonment of treatment in case of adverse events. Patients treated with 1L GemCis did not have superior survival compared to GemCarbo patients, even though GemCarbo patients had worse baseline characteristics.

Real-world retrospective review of monotherapy following platinum-based chemotherapy for metastatic urothelial cancer

To compare estimated survival times of patients who had received maintenance monotherapy with gemcitabine (GEM), or an immuno-oncology (IO) drug (i.e., pembrolizumab or avelumab) or both therapies (one after the other) following platinum-based combination chemotherapy for metastatic urothelial carcinoma (UC) in a real-world setting. For this retrospective study, we included consecutive patients with metastatic UC who had received first-line platinum-based chemotherapy followed by second-line treatment at our centre from March 2008 to June 2020. Of the 74 patients identified, 58 had received monotherapy as second line treatment, and 16 had received combination chemotherapy (i.e., non-monotherapy). The estimated median duration of survival was significantly longer in the monotherapy group compared with the non-monotherapy group (29 vs 7 months). Multivariate analysis showed that the outcome of the first-line chemotherapy treatment was the most important prognostic factor for survival. There was no significant difference in survival times between monotherapy with GEM or IO drugs. In addition, survival was significantly prolonged when GEM therapy was administered following IO drugs compared with GEM therapy alone. Monotherapy following primary chemotherapy for advanced UC significantly prolonged survival times, and IO drug therapy remained effective when followed by GEM single agent maintenance therapy.

Response characteristics of tislelizumab combined with chemotherapy in first-line treatment of locally advanced or metastatic non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer

Objective: To investigate the response characteristics of patients with locally advanced/metastatic non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (nsq-NSCLC) treated with tislelizumab in combination with chemotherapy in the first line. Methods: Patients with nsq-NSCLC who achieved complete or partial remission after treatment with tislelizumab in combination with chemotherapy or chemotherapy alone in the RATIONALE 304 study, as assessed by an independent review board, were selected to analyze the response characteristics and safety profile of the responders. Time to response (TTR) was defined as the time from randomization to the achievement of first objective response. Depth of response (DpR) was defined as the maximum percentage of tumor shrinkage compared with the sum of the baseline target lesion length diameters. Results: As of January 23, 2020, 128 patients treated with tislelizumab in combination with chemotherapy achieved objective tumor response (responders), representing 57.4%(128/223) of the intention-to-treat population, with a TTR of 5.1 to 33.3 weeks and a median TTR of 7.9 weeks. Of the responders (128), 50.8%(65) achieved first remission at the first efficacy assessment (week 6), 31.3%(40) at the second efficacy assessment (week 12), and 18.0%(23) at the third and subsequent tumor assessments. The percentages of responders who achieved a depth of tumor response of 30% to <50%, 50% to <70% and 70% to 100% were 45.3%(58/128), 28.1%(36/128) and 26.6%(34/128), respectively, with median progression-free survival (PFS) of 9.0 months (95% CI: 7.7 to 9.9 months), 11.5 months (95% CI: 7.7 months to not reached) and not reached (95% CI: 11.8 months to not estimable), respectively. Tislelizumab plus chemotherapy were generally well tolerated in responders with similar safety profile to the overall safety population. Conclusion: Among responders to tislelizumab in combination with chemotherapy for nsq-NSCLC, 82.0%(105/128) achieves response within the first two tumor assessments (12 weeks) and 18.0%(23/128) achieves response at later (18 to 33 weeks) assessments, and there is a trend toward prolonged PFS in responders with deeper tumor response.

Sex and gender differences in treatment intention, quality of life and performance status in the first 100 patients with periampullary cancer enrolled in the CHAMP study

BackgroundPeriampullary cancer is a term for cancers arising in or in close proximity to the pancreas. Pancreatic cancer is the 3rd leading cause of cancer death for both sexes and while surgery is the only option for cure, chemotherapy is given in both the adjuvant and palliative settings. The aim of this study was to investigate any sex and gender differences in patients with pancreatic and other periampullary adenocarcinomas enrolled in a prospective, observational trial.MethodsThe study cohort consists of the first 100 patients, 49 women and 51 men, enrolled in the Chemotherapy, Host Response and Molecular dynamics in Periampullary cancer (CHAMP) study, an ongoing study of patients undergoing neoadjuvant, adjuvant or first-line palliative chemotherapy treatment. Twenty-five patients had surgery with curative intent and subsequent adjuvant treatment, and 75 patients were treated with palliative chemotherapy. Data regarding health-related quality of life (HRQoL, EORTC-QLQ-C30) at baseline, demographic and clinicopathological factors were examined and stratification by treatment intention according to sex. Overall survival (OS) was calculated through Kaplan–Meier analysis.ResultsThere was a statistically significant difference between male and female patients treated with curative intent, with fewer women having undergone surgery (18 vs 7, p = 0.017), also after adjustment for age, tumor location and performance status. No statistical differences were found between the sexes regarding age, comorbidities, or clinicopathological factors. Before start of chemotherapy treatment, health-related quality of life (HRQoL) was lower in female than in male patients. However, HRQoL was not associated with performance status in female patients, whereas in male patients several HRQoL indicators were significantly positively associated with poorer performance status at baseline.ConclusionsThis study shows no clear differences between the sexes regarding biological factors concluding that gender bias might be responsible for the discrepancy between men and women being offered curative surgery. The observed difference between women and men regarding the association between HRQoL and performance status is unprecedented. Altogether these findings underline the importance of taking gender into consideration when assessing eligibility for curative surgery in order to improve biological outcome and decrease suffering in both sexes.Trial registrationNCT03724994.

Expression levels of Ki-67 and cyclin D1 in advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma and its prognosis

Introduction and Aim: Nasopharyngeal cancer (NPC) prognosis has been associated with cyclin D1 and Ki-67. These tumor markers had never been tested in NPC patients in Indonesia before. Therefore, this study aims to evaluate the relationships between Ki-67 and cyclin D1 expression levels and the clinicopathological features of nasopharyngeal cancer (NPC) patients. Materials and Methods: During the years 2015 until 2018, thirty-one nasopharyngeal cancer patients were studied in a cohort study at RSUPN Dr. Cipto Mangunkusumo. Patients aged 18 years, diagnosed with NPC according to the histopathological results, metastasis NPC, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group 0–1, and those who had completed first-line chemotherapy treatment with 5–fluorouracil were included in this study. The Ki-67 and cyclin D1 expression levels were evaluated with the h-score. The NLR values were collected prior to the treatment. The 2-year survival rate was analyzed based on the optimal cut-off value obtained. The optimal cut-off values of Ki-67 and cyclin D1 were categorized into high- and low-expression groups to observe the 2-year mortality. Results: The relationships between Ki-67 and cyclin D1, clinical, pathological, and prognosis of patients were examined. Patients with Ki-67 high expression had a worse 2-year survival rate than those with low expression (p0.05). Ki-67 expression was found to be significantly related to adverse outcomes (p0.05, OR: 41.107, 95% CI: 2.600–649.940), while the cyclin D1 expression was not significantly related to adverse outcomes (p0.05). Conclusion: Ki-67 expression was associated with poor prognosis in NPC patients. Nevertheless, further research is required to explore the specific mechanism of cyclin D1 expression in NPC prognosis.