Chemotherapy For Advanced Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma Research Articles

Digital subtraction angiography-guided pancreatic arterial infusion of GEMOX chemotherapy in advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma: a phase II, open-label, randomized controlled trial comparing with intravenous chemotherapy

BackgroundAdvanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma lacks effective treatment options, and systemic gemcitabine-based chemotherapy offers only marginal survival benefits at the cost of significant toxicities and adverse events. New therapeutic options with better drug availability are warranted. This study aims to evaluate the safety and efficacy of digital subtraction angiography (DSA)-guided pancreatic arterial infusion (PAI) versus intravenous chemotherapy (IVC) using the gemcitabine and oxaliplatin (GEMOX) regimen in unresectable locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer (PC) patients.Materials and methodsThis study prospectively enrolled 51 eligible treatment-naive patients with unresectable PC to receive GEMOX treatment via PAI or IVC (1:1 ratio randomization) from December 2015 to December 2019. Cycles were repeated monthly, and each process consisted of two treatments administered bi-weekly. Overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), 1-year survival, 6-month survival, tumor-site subgroup survival, and incidences of adverse events were compared.ResultsThe median OS of the PAI and IVC groups were 9.93 months and 10.07 months, respectively (p = 0.3049). The median PFS of the PAI and IVC groups were 5.07 months and 4.23 months (p = 0.1088). No significant differences were found in the ORR (11.54% vs. 4%, p = 0.6312), DCR (53.85% vs. 44%, p = 0.482), and 1-year OS rate (44% vs. 20.92%, p = 0.27) in PAI and IVC groups. The 6-month OS rate was significantly higher in the PAI group (100%) than in the IVC group (83.67%) (p = 0.0173). The median OS of patients in PAI group with pancreatic head and neck tumors were significantly higher than those of body and tail tumors (12.867 months vs. 9 months, p = 0.0214). The incidences of hematologic disorders, liver function disorders, and digestive disorders in the IVC group were higher than in the PAI group (p < 0.05).ConclusionGEMOX PAI therapy presented a higher 6-month OS rate and fewer adverse events than IVC in advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma patients. Those with pancreatic head and neck tumors may yield a superior treatment outcome from PAI treatment.Trial registration numberNCT02635971.Date of registration21/12/2015.

Comparison of gemcitabine plus oxaliplatin versus gemcitabine plus nab-paclitaxel as first-line chemotherapy for advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma: A single-center retrospective analysis.

Pancreatic cancer is mostly diagnosed in an advanced stage and treated with systemic therapy with palliative intent. Nowadays, the doublet chemotherapy of Gemcitabine and nab-paclitaxel (Gem-Nab) is one of the most frequently used regimens worldwide, but is not ubiquitarily available or reimbursed. Therefore, we compared the clinical efficacy of Gem-Nab to a historical control of patients treated with gemcitabine and oxaliplatin (Gem-Ox) at our tertiary cancer center, which was the standard treatment prior to the introduction of FOLFIRINOX. This single-center retrospective real world study includes 121 patients diagnosed with locally advanced or primary metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma who were treated with chemotherapy doublet, with either Gem-Nab or Gem-Ox in palliative first-line. Survival rates were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method, and comparisons were made with log-rank tests. Gem-Ox was considered as standard first line therapy at our institution for patients who were deemed fit for doublet chemotherapy between the years 2006 to 2012. These patients were compared to a cohort of patients treated with the new standard first-line therapy of Gem-Nab between 2013 and 2020. A total of 554 patients with pancreatic cancer of all stages were screened, and 73 patients treated with Gem-Nab and 48 patients treated with Gem-Ox in the palliative first-line setting were identified and included in this analysis. Patients receiving Gem-Ox had a statistically significantly better performance score (ECOG PS) when compared to the Gem-Nab group (Odds ratio (OR) 0.28, 95% CI 0.12-0.65, p = 0.005), more often suffered from locally advanced than metastatic disease (OR 3.10, 95% CI 1.27-7.91, p = 0.019) and were younger in age (OR 0.95, 95% CI 0.91-0.99, p = 0.013). Median overall survival (OS) of the whole study cohort was 10.3 months (95% CI 8.5-11.6). No statistically significant difference in OS could be observed between the Gem-Nab and the Gem-Ox cohort (median OS: 8.9 months (95% CI 6.4-13.5) versus 10.9 months (95% CI 9.5-13.87, p = 0.794, HR 1.27, 95% CI 0.85-1.91)). Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 6.8 months in the entire cohort (95% CI 4.9-8.4). No statistically significant difference in PFS could be observed between the Gem-Nab and the Gem-Ox cohort (median PFS: 5.8 months (95% CI 4.3-8.2) versus 7.9 months (95% CI 5.4-9.5) p = 0.536, HR 1.11, 95% CI 0.74-1.67). Zero-truncated negative binomial regressions on OS and PFS adjusting for gender, age, performance status (ECOG PS), and CA19-9 levels yielded no significant difference between Gem-Nab or Gem-Ox. From our analysis, we could evidence no difference in outcome parameters in this retrospective analysis despite the worse prognostic pattern for GemOX. Therefore, we suggest Gem-Ox as potential first line treatment option for inoperable locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer, especially if Gem-Nab is not available.

Systematic Review of Single-Agent vs. Multi-Agent Chemotherapy for Advanced Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma in Elderly vs. Younger Patients.

To systematically review all studies comparing multi-agent to single-agent chemotherapy in the first and second-line setting for unresectable pancreatic adenocarcinoma, so as to compare the outcomes of young and elderly patients. This review searched three databases for relevant studies. The inclusion criteria were diagnosis of locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma, comparison of an elderly versus young population, comparison of single-agent versus multi-agent chemotherapy, data on survival outcomes, and randomised controlled trials. The exclusion criteria were phase I trials, incomplete studies, retrospective analyses, systematic reviews, and case reports. A meta-analysis was performed on second-line chemotherapy in elderly patients. Six articles were included in this systematic review. Three of these studies explored first-line treatment and three explored second-line treatment. In the subgroup analysis, the meta-analysis showed statistically improved overall survival for elderly patients receiving single-agent second-line treatment. This systematic review confirmed that combination chemotherapy improved survival in the first-line treatment of advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma, regardless of age. The benefit of combination chemotherapy in second-line studies for elderly patients with advanced pancreas cancer was less clear.

Pembrolizumab in combination with the oncolytic virus pelareorep in patients progressing on systemic chemotherapy for advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma: A phase II study.

e16789 Background: Pelareorep is an intravenously delivered oncolytic reovirus that can induce a T-cell-inflamed phenotype in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). Analysis of tumor tissue from patients treated with pelareorep have shown reovirus replication, T-cell infiltration, and upregulation of PD-L1. We hypothesized that pelareorep in combination pembrolizumab in patients with PDAC would lead to improved response, effective T-cell recognition of tumor antigens and expand peripheral T-cell repertoire. Methods: This investigator-initiated phase II study enrolled PDAC patients who progressed after first-line treatment. Patients received pelareorep at a dose of 4.5x1010TCID50IV on Days 1, 2, 3 &amp; 8of Cycle (C) 1, and Days 1 &amp; 8 with C2 onwards. Pembrolizumab was administered on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle at 200 mg IV. Primary objective was overall response rate (ORR) by RECIST v 1.1 criteria. Secondary objectives included evaluation for reovirus replication and immune analysis in peripheral blood and tumor biopsies. The study was designed using Simon’s two-stage design with 90% power and one-sided alpha = 0.025 to compare 10% vs. 35% ORR. A total of ≥2/11 responses were needed to proceed to stage 2. Results: Thirteen patients were enrolled. Disease control was achieved in 30% of the 12 efficacy-evaluable patients. One patient achieved partial response. Three additional patients achieved stable disease. Treatment was well tolerated, with mostly grade 1 or 2 treatment-related adverse events, including flu-like symptoms. Viral replication was observed in on-treatment tumor biopsies. T-cell receptor sequencing from peripheral blood revealed a high degree of peripheral repertoire turnover and creation of new T-cell clones during treatment. Immune correlation with efficacy analysis is ongoing. Conclusions: Pelareorep with pembrolizumab showed manageable safety profiles and modest efficacy in an unselected PDAC population. The study will not proceed to stage II, however further evaluation of anti-tumor activity of pelareorep and anti-PD-1 therapy is now planned in biomarker defined patients. Clinical trial information: NCT03723915 .

The prognostic impact of sarcopenic change after 8 weeks of 1st line gemcitabine based chemotherapy in advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

e16237Background: Sarcopenia has recently been acknowledged as the major component of cancer cachexia. We evaluate the prognostic impact of sarcopenic change after 8 weeks of first-line gemcitabine...

Overall Survival Prediction and Usefulness of Second-Line Chemotherapy in Advanced Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma.

In advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (aPDAC), there is no consensual strategy for second-line chemotherapy (L2). Better discrimination of overall survival (OS) may help clinical decision-making. We aimed to predict OS from the beginning of L2 and to assess the benefit from chemotherapy among the identified risk groups. Analyses were derived from all consecutive aPDAC patients treated at Besancon University Hospital, Besancon, France, between January 2003 and December 2013 (n = 462). The association of 50 parameters with OS was evaluated using univariate and multivariable Cox analyses. Based on the final model, a prognostic nomogram and score were developed and externally validated. Patients in the external validation cohort who received L2 (n = 163) were treated at three French institutions between January 2010 and April 2016. All statistical tests were two-sided. In the development cohort, 395 patients (85.5%) were eligible for L2, of which 261 (66.1%) were treated. Age, smoking status, liver metastases, performance status, pain, jaundice, ascites, duration of first-line, and type of L2 regimen were identified as independent prognostic factors for OS in L2. The score determined three groups with median OS of 11.3 months (95% confidence interval [CI] = 9.1 to 12.9 months), 3.6 months (95% CI = 2.6 to 4.7 months), and 1.4 months (95% CI = 1.2 to 1.7 months), for low-, intermediate-, and high-risk groups, respectively ( P < .001). By applying the score in the population eligible for L2 but untreated, the chemotherapy benefit was statistically significant across all groups, but with a magnitude of the effect decreased statistically significantly from low- to high-risk groups ( P = .001 for treatment and risk groups interaction term). The ability of the score to discriminate OS was confirmed in the external validation cohort. This prognostic nomogram and score in patients with aPDAC can accurately predict OS before administration of L2 and may help clinicians in their therapeutic decisions.

Development and validation of a prognostic nomogram and score to predict overall survival and usefulness of second-line chemotherapy in advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

354 Background: In advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (aPDAC), there is no consensual strategy for second-line chemotherapy (L2). Better discrimination of overall survival (OS) may help clinical decision-making in this setting. We aimed to predict OS from the beginning of L2 and to assess the benefit from chemotherapy among the identified risk groups. Methods: Analyses were derived from all consecutive aPDAC patients treated at Besancon hospital, France, during 11 years. The association of 50 parameters with OS was evaluated using univariate and multivariate Cox analyses. Based on the final model, a prognostic nomogram and score were developed, and externally validated in patients receiving L2 in three other French centers, between 2010 and 2016. Results: The development cohort included 462 patients. 395 patients (85%) were eligible for L2, of which 261 (66%) were treated. Age, smoking status, liver metastases, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, pain, jaundice, ascites, duration of first-line chemotherapy, and type of L2 regimen were identified as independent prognostic factors for OS in L2. The final model exhibited excellent calibration and discrimination (C-index = 0.75, 95% confidence interval 0.72 to 0.78), and robust internal validity. Based on the final model, a prognostic nomogram was built. The nomogram total points were input into a prognostic score that delineated three risk groups with median OS of 11.3, 3.6 and 1.4 months (P &lt; 0.0001). By applying the score in the population eligible for L2 but untreated, the chemotherapy benefit was significant across all groups but with a magnitude of the effect decreased significantly from low to high-risk groups (P = 0.0123 for treatment and risk groups interaction term). The clinical benefit centered accuracy of the final model was confirmed by a decision curve analysis. The score ability to discriminate OS was externally confirmed in 162 patients, by identifying the same risk groups. Conclusions: These prognostic tools in patients with aPDAC can accurately predict OS before administration of L2 and strengthen the prognosis-based decision making for clinicians.

Blood neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio predicts survival in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer treated with chemotherapy.

Although a high neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) has been reported to be a predictor of poor survival in patients with pancreatic cancers, its prognostic role in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer undergoing chemotherapy remains unclear. This study was performed to determine the prognostic role of NLR in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer undergoing chemotherapy. We retrospectively enrolled 403 patients undergoing chemotherapy for advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma from 2002 to 2013. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify clinicopathological predictors of overall survival including baseline NLR (NLR before chemotherapy) and postchemotherapy NLR change (NLR change before and after one cycle of chemotherapy), using the Cox proportional hazards model. Clinicopathological characteristics related to baseline NLR and postchemotherapy NLR change were evaluated. Univariate and multivariate analyses showed that both baseline NLR (NLR≥3.1 vs. NLR<3.1, hazard ratio [HR]=1.42; P=0.001) and postchemotherapy NLR change (NLR≥3.1 and increased vs. NLR<3.1 and decreased, HR=2.39; P=0.000) were independent prognostic factors in overall survival. NLR≥3.1 before chemotherapy and NLR postchemotherapy change were significantly correlated with distant metastasis, serum CA19-9 levels, and serum albumin levels. Baseline NLR and postchemotherapy NLR change may serve as potential biomarkers for overall survival in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer undergoing chemotherapy.

Chemotherapy for advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma in elderly patients (≥70 years of age): A retrospective cohort study at the National Center for Tumor Diseases Heidelberg

BackgroundPancreatic cancer is mainly a disease of the elderly population, but clinical trials do not reflect this age distribution. Data on treatment strategies and outcome of older patients are limited. The aim of our study was to analyze safety and outcome in elderly patients with advanced pancreatic cancer treated with palliative chemotherapy at the outpatient clinic of the National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT) at Heidelberg University Hospital. Materials and methodsWe retrospectively analyzed 53 patients ≥70 years using a prospectively maintained database. Requirements were (1) histologically proven diagnosis of ductal pancreatic adenocarcinoma, (2) age ≥70 at time of diagnosis of advanced disease, and (3) measurable advanced disease. ResultsThe median age was 73 years. 81% of the patients received a gemcitabine-based first-line therapy. Median overall survival was 6.7 months. Survival differed significantly between patient groups with low (≤1) and high (≥2) Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (7.8 vs. 3.9 months, p = 0.002). 30.2% of the patients developed side effects resulting in dosage reductions. 39.6% of the patients received second-line treatment. Residual survival after disease progression was significantly longer for second-line treatment compared to best supportive care (151 vs. 39 days, p = 0.019). ConclusionsOverall, our older patients did not have an inferior outcome compared to the reported trial populations that included younger patients. Thus, palliative chemotherapy should be considered independently from chronological age, but the performance status should be carefully noticed. Second-line therapy should be considered for patients in good performance status after first progression.

Survival benefit of second-line chemotherapy in advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma: A systematic review of the literature.

296 Background: There is currently no standard of care for the second-line treatment of advanced pancreatic cancer. Very few randomised studies have been performed in this setting. The aim of this analysis was to compare the different therapeutic approaches in this setting, and the rate of second line treatment delivery and its influence on reported overall survival. Methods: We carried out a systematic analysis of studies in advanced pancreatic cancer. 1st and 2nd line chemotherapy trials were identified from MEDLINE, EMBASE &amp; CENTRAL using the COCHRANE sensitive search strategy. Objective response rates (ORR) and survival (PFS &amp; OS) were extracted and compared amongst groups using the Mann-Whitney U test. For 1st line studies, the percentage of patients who received 2nd line chemotherapy was also extracted and plotted against reported median overall survival (OS) and post-progression survival (PPS), defined as arithmetic difference between median OS and progression-free survival. Linear regression was used to explore the relationship between overall survival and second-line chemotherapy. Results: 20 first line clinical trials with 42 treatment arms met the inclusion criteria treating an aggregate total of 5,768 patients. Overall survival was positively correlated with use of second-line chemotherapy (r=0.65; p=0.012). 61 second-line studies were identified treating an aggregate total of 2,562 patients in 66 treatment arms. Combination treatment was associated with an improved response rate (p=0.045) and PFS (p=0.024) when compared to single agent therapy. Conclusions: In this exploratory analysis, these data suggest that there is a small benefit of second-line chemotherapy in pancreatic cancer. In first-line chemotherapy studies, the use of subsequent treatment correlates with improved overall survival. In second line studies, combination chemotherapy is associated with higher response rates and survival.

Carbohydrate antigen 19‐9 change during chemotherapy for advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma

Radiologic assessment of tumor response in pancreatic cancer is complicated by desmoplastic reactions within or around the tumor. The objective of this study was to evaluate the correlation between a decline in carbohydrate antigen 19-9 (CA 19-9) and survival in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer who received upfront chemotherapy. CA 19-9 serum basal values were measured in 247 patients with advanced pancreatic cancer who were enrolled in 5 consecutive trials between 1997 and 2007. Survival curves were compared among patients who had a predefined CA 19-9 nadir variation (<50%. Group 1; 50% to 89%, Group 2; or >89%, Group 3). To eliminate guarantee-time bias, survival analysis was repeated using the landmark method. In both univariate and multivariate analysis, the basal CA 19-9 value significantly predicted survival. The median survival was 15.5 months for 34 patients who had normal basal CA 19-9 values, 11.9 months for 108 patients who had basal values between 38 U/mL and 1,167 U/mL, and 8 months for 105 patients who had basal values >1,167 U/mL. At least 1 CA 19-9 follow-up value was available for 204 patients who had baseline values greater than normal. A significant difference in overall survival was observed in univariate and multivariate analyses between Groups 1 and 2, between Groups 1 and 3, and between Groups 2 and 3. The results were confirmed using the landmark method. In this study, baseline CA 19-9 was confirmed as an independent prognostic factor for survival, and it may be considered as a stratification factor in trials in patients with advanced pancreatic cancer. Biochemical response may be used as a complementary measure to radiologic response to provide a better assessment of chemotherapy activity and to drive treatment decisions in clinical practice.

3526 POSTER Prognostic value of carbohydrate antigen (CA)19–9 decrease in response to chemotherapy for advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PA)

3526 POSTER Prognostic value of carbohydrate antigen (CA)19–9 decrease in response to chemotherapy for advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PA)

Effect of low-molecular-weight heparin on survival in patients with advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma

This retrospective analysis aimed to identify whether low-molecular-weight heparins (LMWH) might improve survival in patients receiving chemotherapeutic treatment for advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Two hundred forty-three patients who had received chemotherapy for advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma were identified from a prospectively maintained database. Of these, 30 patients had to be excluded from analysis due to insufficient documentation. Of the remaining 213 patients 94 patients had been treated with LMWH, whereas 119 patients served as controls. Outcome was assessed in relation to overall survival, which was calculated from the date of initiation of chemotherapy to the date of death. There was no significant difference (hazard ratio, 0.8; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.6 to 1.1; P = 0,2) between the two groups in terms of overall survival. The median survival was 7.1 months (95% CI, 5.8-8.4 months) in the LMWH group and 5.9 months (95% CI, 5.1-6.7 months) in the non-LMWH group. A positive effect of LMWH was seen in patients with metastatic disease (hazard ratio for LMWH vs. non-LMWH, 0,6; 95% CI, 0,4 to 0,8; P = 0,006) in contrast to those without metastatic disease (hazard ratio for LMWH vs. non-LMWH, 1; 95% CI, 0.6 to 1.7; P = 0,96). The median survival of patients with metastatic disease was 6,6 months (95% CI, 5-8, 2 months) and 3.8 months (95% CI, 2.5-5.1 months) for the LMWH group and the non-LMWH group, respectively. In conclusion, we found for metastatic pancreatic adenocarcinoma a survival advantage for patients receiving LMWH. Nevertheless, our observations need confirmation by prospective randomized studies.

Phase II study of gefitinib and docetaxel as salvage therapy in patients (pts) with advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma (APC)

4120 Background: There is no standard-of-care second-line chemotherapy for APC. The combination of docetaxel and gefitinib, an inhibitor of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) shows enhanced preclinical activity compared to docetaxel alone. Docetaxel alone has activity in APC, and this phase II trial is designed to evaluate the combination. The primary endpoint is survival with an accrual goal of 45 patients to detect an improvement to 5.25 months (mo) in median survival time by one-sided log-rank test at level α = 0.05. Methods: Patients with APC and one prior chemotherapy regimen are eligible for study; EGFR over-expression is not required. Gefitinib is administered at the dose of 250 mg/day orally without interruption. The initial dose of docetaxel was 75 mg/m2 every three weeks (one cycle), but was reduced to 60 mg/m2 due to a high incidence of febrile neutropenia. Results: 31 pts, all with prior gemcitabine therapy, have been enrolled on study to date, with 26 evaluable for toxicity. Patient characteristics: 62% male; 92 % with ECOG performance status 0/1, 8% ECOG of 2; median age 64 years (range 47–82 years). The best response is stable disease (5 pts), median cycles administered 2 (range 1–12). Thus far the median survival time is 4.4 mo, with median time to progression of 2.5 mo. Grade (G) 3/4 febrile neutropenia occurred in 8 out of 18 pts treated at the 75 mg/m2 dose of docetaxel; none has been seen with the 60 mg/m2 dose. Other G 3/4 adverse events include: diarrhea (3.8%), rash (7.7%), constitutional symptoms (11.5%), and nausea (11.5%). Conclusion: The combination of gefitinib and docetaxel at 60 mg/m2 is tolerable, with interim results showing a median survival time of 4.4 mo at this point. If the protocol’s goal of median survival time of 5.25 mo is met upon study completion, the combination may be worthy of further investigation. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Oxaliplatin combined with 5-FU in second line treatment of advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma: Results of a phase II trial

The efficacy and benefit of second-line chemotherapy in advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma has never been demonstrated although it is regularly used. A randomized phase II study evaluating oxaliplatin alone (OXA), infusional 5-fluorouracil alone (5-FU) and an oxaliplatin/infusional 5-FU combination (OXFU) in untreated advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma has been conducted. In this trial, a second-line treatment with the OXFU regimen (OXA 130 mg/m2 2-h intravenous (i.v.) infusion combined with 5-FU (1000 mg/m2/day, continuous i.v., days 1-4), every 3 weeks) was offered to patients progressing after single agent treatment. Eighteen out of 32 patients (12 males, median age 57 years) treated in the single agent arms received the OXFU combination in second-line treatment. WHO performance status was at least 2 in 61% of the patients. There was no objective response and 3 patients (17%) had a disease stabilisation. Median time to progression from the start of second-line treatment was 0.9 months. Median overall survival was 4.9 months from the start of front-line therapy and 1.3 months from the start of second-line therapy. The results of this trial bring arguments to support a modest value of second-line chemotherapy for advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

Second-line intra-arterial chemotherapy in advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma.

The present study was conducted to evaluate activity and toxicity of the FLEC (folinic acid 100 mg/m2; 5-fluorouracil 1000 mg/m2; carboplatin 300 mg/m2; epirubicin 60 mg/m2) schedule as second-line treatment for progressive locally advanced or metastatic pancreatic cancer (LAMPC). FLEC was administered every 3 weeks with an angiographic catheter introduced into the tumor vascular bed. Thirty-two patients were enrolled. Twenty patients had a PS of 2. Twenty-five patients had metastatic disease to liver. Seven (21.9%) partial responses were observed (WHO criteria). Fifteen patients (46.9%) had stable disease and ten patients (31.2%) had progressive disease. The median OS from the diagnosis was 11.8 months. PS (p=0.0308) and pain (WHO scale, p=0.0222; analogic scale, p=0.0446) significantly improved after therapy. No patient discontinued treatment because of toxicity (NCI-CTC criteria). The current study shows that intraarterial chemotherapy is a good therapeutic option in second-line treatment of LAMPC.

A phase II study: docetaxel as first-line chemotherapy for advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma

The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of docetaxel as first-line chemotherapy in patients with unresectable metastatic or locally advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma and to further characterise the safety and pharmacokinetic profiles of docetaxel. 43 patients were enrolled into this phase II study. Treatment consisted of a 1-h infusion of docetaxel 100 mg/m 2 every 3 weeks without premedication with corticosteroids until progression or unacceptable toxicity occurred. Dose modifications were planned for adverse events. Patients were observed for 1 month after the last docetaxel infusion, to document any late adverse events, with a follow-up every 3 months until death. Response rate and duration were the major efficacy endpoints. Response status was reviewed by an external independent panel. Pharmacokinetic analysis was performed during the first treatment cycle. 40 patients were evaluable for response, and all were evaluable for safety. After independent review, partial response was recorded in 6 patients (overall response rate, 15%; 95% confidence limit (CI), 7.7–29.8%) and stable disease was recorded in 15 patients (38%). The median duration of response was 5.1 months (range: 3.1–7.2). The median pain control time was 4.5 months (range: 0–8) and the median time to performance status worsening was 2.3 months (range: 0–4.5). Most patients 40 (93.0%) received a relative dose intensity of more than 70% of the planned dose. The incidence and severity of adverse events reflected the known safety profile for docetaxel. Docetaxel clearance was reduced in patients with elevated concentrations of hepatic enzymes or bilirubin. Docetaxel is an active agent for unresectable metastatic or locally advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma.