Chemo-somatosensory Event-related Potentials Research Articles

Subjective and objective olfactory abnormalities in Crohn's disease.

The pathogenesis of Crohn's disease (CD) is still unknown, but the involvement of the olfactory system in CD appears possible. No study to date has systematically assessed the olfactory function in CD patients. We investigated the olfactory function in CD patients in active (n = 31) and inactive disease (n = 27) and in a control group of age- and sex-matched healthy subjects (n = 35). Subjective olfactory testing was applied using the Sniffin' Sticks test. For olfactory testing, olfactory event-related potentials (OERPs) were obtained with a 4-channel olfactometer using phenyl ethyl alcohol (PEA) and hydrogen sulfide (H(2)S). Carbon dioxide (CO(2)) was employed as control stimulus, and chemosomatosensory event-related potentials (CSSERPs) were registered. Results of the Sniffin' Sticks test revealed significantly different olfactory hedonic judgment with increased olfactory hedonic estimates for pleasant odorants in CD patients in active disease compared with healthy subjects. A statistical trend was found toward lower olfactory thresholds in CD patients. In objective olfactory testing, CD patients showed lower amplitudes of OERPs and CSSERPs. Additionally, OERPs showed significantly shorter N1- and P2 latencies following stimulation of the right nostril with H(2)S in CD patients in inactive disease compared with controls. Our study demonstrates specific abnormalities of olfactory perception in CD patients.

On the relation between capsaicin sensitivity and responsiveness to CO2: detection sensitivity and event-related brain potentials

Sensory hyperreactivity (SHR) with predominantly airway symptoms is a subgroup of chemical intolerance to various environmental substances with pungent/odorous properties. The hallmark of SHR is sensitivity to capsaicin inhalation, resulting in extensive coughing likely to be mediated by a C-fiber hyperreactivity of the airway sensory neurons. However, it is not clear whether capsaicin sensitivity implies a greater sensitivity to chemosomatosensory substances in general. Therefore, the present study tested the hypothesis of an association between capsaicin cough sensitivity and sensitivity to CO(2) with respect to detection sensitivity and electrophysiological brain response. A correlational study was employed to investigate the relation between capsaicin cough sensitivity and detection thresholds and chemosomatosensory event-related potentials (ERPs) for CO(2) presented in the nasal cavity in 35 persons varying in capsaicin cough sensitivity. Number of coughs were found to correlate negatively with CO(2) threshold and tended to correlate negatively also with N1 and P2 latencies of the chemosomatosensory ERP for CO(2). No tendencies of correlations were found between number of coughs and latencies for olfactory and auditory ERPs, recorded for comparison, but, unexpectedly, were found between number of coughs and auditory N1 amplitude. The results imply that capsaicin cough sensitivity, such as in SHR, is related to higher detection sensitivity, and tends to be related to faster cortical processing of other chemosomatosensory substances, at least of CO(2).

Intranasal trigeminal sensitivity in subjects with allergic rhinitis

Trigeminal nerve endings of the human nasal mucosa are activated by chemical, physical or thermal stimuli. Activation of these A(delta) and C fibers can be quantified through the recording of chemo-somatosensory event-related potentials (ERP). The aim of this study was to investigate whether allergy-related activation of trigeminal nerve endings leads to changes in their responsiveness to intranasal trigeminal stimulation. Gaseous carbon dioxide (CO(2)) stimuli were applied in three sessions (baseline, after NaCl solution and after allergen application) to the nasal mucosa of 13 subjects with allergic rhinitis. Chemo-somatosensory ERP were recorded, and subjects rated the intensity of rhinitis symptoms. Administration of allergen produced a significant shortening of chemo-somatosensory ERP peak latencies P1 and N1. Observed changes of latencies were in line with rhinitis symptoms subjects indicated during the session. In addition, there was a negative relation between the general symptom score and ERP peak latencies, obtained both at baseline and after allergen exposure. In conclusion, it is hypothesized that in patients suffering from allergic rhinitis, nasal itching and sneezing after allergen exposure are, at least in part, clinical correlates of the activation of trigeminal nerve endings due to local inflammatory mechanisms. The correlations between ERP latencies and the patients' symptoms indicate that ERP latencies may possess a predictive value of the subjects' responsiveness to allergens.

Responsiveness of human nasal mucosa to trigeminal stimuli depends on the site of stimulation

There is evidence that functionally different areas can be distinguished within the nasal mucosa with regard to stimulation site and stimulus properties. The aim of the present study was the comparison of electrophysiological and psychophysical measures obtained in response to mechanical and chemosomatosensory stimulation of two different regions of the nasal mucosa. A total of 40 volunteers participated in this study (age range 21–36 years). Chemosomatosensory event-related potentials (ERPs) were recorded using gaseous CO2 as stimulant, while somatosensory ERPs were recorded in response to intranasal mechanical stimuli (air puffs). Stimuli were released to the anterior portion and to the posterior portion of the nasal cavity. A significant interaction between stimulus properties and site of stimulation could be detected after analysis of ERP parameters and intensity ratings. Thus, the chemosensory stimulus was perceived as stronger in the anterior portion of the nasal cavity whereas this was not the case for mechanosensory stimuli. In addition, mechanosensory stimuli were found to evoke ERPs with shorter latencies. These results underline the idea that the respiratory mucosa should not be seen as a homogeneous tissue. It exhibits varying sensitivities to trigeminal stimulation depending on stimulus quality and site of stimulation. Hence, perception of chemosensory stimuli seems to be most accurate in the anterior portion of the nasal cavity, while sensitivity to mechanical stimuli appears to be highest in the posterior portion. In addition, these differences within the respiratory mucosa may contribute to differences in the perception of orthonasal and retronasal odorous stimulation.

Responsiveness of human nasal mucosa to trigeminal stimuli depends on the site of stimulation

There is evidence that functionally different areas can be distinguished within the nasal mucosa with regard to stimulation site and stimulus properties. The aim of the present study was the comparison of electrophysiological and psychophysical measures obtained in response to mechanical and chemosomatosensory stimulation of two different regions of the nasal mucosa. A total of 40 volunteers participated in this study (age range 21–36 years). Chemosomatosensory event-related potentials (ERPs) were recorded using gaseous CO 2 as stimulant, while somatosensory ERPs were recorded in response to intranasal mechanical stimuli (air puffs). Stimuli were released to the anterior portion and to the posterior portion of the nasal cavity. A significant interaction between stimulus properties and site of stimulation could be detected after analysis of ERP parameters and intensity ratings. Thus, the chemosensory stimulus was perceived as stronger in the anterior portion of the nasal cavity whereas this was not the case for mechanosensory stimuli. In addition, mechanosensory stimuli were found to evoke ERPs with shorter latencies. These results underline the idea that the respiratory mucosa should not be seen as a homogeneous tissue. It exhibits varying sensitivities to trigeminal stimulation depending on stimulus quality and site of stimulation. Hence, perception of chemosensory stimuli seems to be most accurate in the anterior portion of the nasal cavity, while sensitivity to mechanical stimuli appears to be highest in the posterior portion. In addition, these differences within the respiratory mucosa may contribute to differences in the perception of orthonasal and retronasal odorous stimulation.

Anesthesia affects olfaction and chemosensory event-related potentials

Objective Olfactory and trigeminal systems interact and contribute to the perception of odorants. This study was aimed at investigating the effect of local anesthesia on olfaction. Methods One percent of tetracaine on a cotton swab was applied intranasally at three different locations in 20 volunteers and 4% of lidocaine was applied to the olfactory cleft in a head-down position. Before and after anesthesia, self-assessment, psychometric testing and olfactory event-related potentials [OERPs, using H 2S and phenyl ethyl alcohol (PEA)], and chemosomatosensory event-related potentials (CSSERPs, using CO 2) were examined. Results Anesthesia at all four locations significantly lowered the perceived self-assessment of olfaction, while using the cotton swab only anesthesia in the middle meatus elevated threshold ( P=0.020), lowered discrimination ( P=0.015) and prolonged OERP (PEA, P=0.008; H 2S, P=0.016), as well as CSSERPs latencies (CO 2, P=0.020). However, complete temporary anosmia was only achieved after applying 4% lidocaine into the olfactory cleft. Conclusions Intranasal anesthesia applied with a swab reduced self-assessment of olfaction but was unable to produce anosmia. Psychometric test results were concordant with changes in chemosensory event-related potentials. Significance Temporary anosmia is technically difficult to achieve but could be demonstrated for the first time using local anesthesia. Even though anesthesia influences self-assessment, measurable olfactory function can remain unchanged.

Patients with rheumatoid arthritis adapt differently to repetitive painful stimuli compared to healthy controls

The aim of the study was to investigate whether there are changes of the nociceptive system in patients with chronic inflammatory joint pain. A pain model was used which is based on the recording of cortical chemo-somatosensory event-related potentials (CSSERP) after nociceptive stimulation of the nasal mucosa with gaseous carbon dioxide (CO2). Twenty-five patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) were compared to healthy controls matched for age and gender. Responses to both different intensities of painful stimuli and constant intensities of series of 4 stimuli were analysed. When testing in creasing CO2concentrations ratings and CSSERP amplitudes increased for both patients and controls. However, when repetitive stimulation was performed with an interval of 2s CSSERP amplitudes N1 were significantly greater in RA patients. It is hypothesized that chronic inflammatory joint pain changes nociceptive processing in terms of generalized changes of the nociceptive system which may amplify chronic pain.

Chemosensory event-related potentials in response to trigeminal and olfactory stimulation in idiopathic Parkinson's disease.

Decrease of olfactory function in patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) has been reported by several authors. The current study investigated olfaction in PD patients using olfactory event-related potentials (OERPs) as an electrophysiologic correlate of olfactory function in combination with psychophysical testing. A specific focus was the influence of antiparkinsonian drugs. We investigated PD patients treated with antiparkinsonian drugs (n = 13) and PD patients who received no pharmacologic treatment (n = 18). They were compared to age- and sex-matched control subjects (n = 38). To obtain OERPs, stimulants were chosen to stimulate specifically the olfactory nerve (2.1 ppm vanillin, 0.8 ppm H2S). In addition, chemosomatosensory event-related potentials were recorded after trigeminal stimulation with 52% v/v CO2. Moreover, the subjects' ability to identify and to discriminate odorants was tested by means of a "squeeze bottle" technique. The study yielded the following major results: (1) Odor identification was impaired in PD patients. It was not influenced by treatment with antiparkinsonian drugs. (2) The OERP latencies were prolonged in both PD patients taking and not taking antiparkinsonian drugs; however, this effect was more pronounced in PD patients taking antiparkinsonian drugs. (3) The intranasal chemosensory trigeminal system seemingly was neither affected by the neuronal degeneration seen in PD nor by treatment with antiparkinsonian drugs.

Loss of olfactory function leads to a decrease of trigeminal sensitivity.

Healthy controls were compared to patients with decreased olfactory sensitivity (n = 32) to investigate interactions between the olfactory and trigeminal systems. Amplitudes of chemo-somatosensory event-related potentials in response to suprathreshold trigeminal stimuli (CO2) were found to be smaller in patients (P < 0.05) indicating a decrease of trigeminally mediated sensations.

Chemo-somatosensory event-related potentials in response to repetitive painful chemical stimulation of the nasal mucosa

The aim of the study was to investigate how chemo-somatosensory event-related potentials (CSSERPs) and pain ratings are modified by repetitive painful stimulation of the nasal mucosa (58% v/v CO 2, 200 msec duration). Twenty-two subjects performed 3 experiments during which trains of stimuli were applied. The interstimulus interval (ISI) between stimuli was constant for each experiment, but varied between experiments (8, 4, and 2 sec). CSSERPs were obtained from positions (Fz, C3, Cz, C4, and Pz). The subjects not only rated the overall perceived intensities but also reported the quality of the stimuli. At an ISI of 8 sec estimates decreased and only stinging sensations were reported. In contrast, at an interval of 2 sec estimates increased being accompanied by the buildup of burning pain. This phenomenon was interpreted in terms of the superposition of first (sharp and stinging pain: Aδ fibers) and second pain (dull and burning pain: C fibers), respectively. However, given the special circumstances of short ISIs CSSERP amplitudes decreased the more the shorter the ISI was. In line with previous investigations it is hypothesised that CSSERPs predominantly reflect nociceptive information transmitted via Aδ fibers.

Chemo-somatosensory event-related potentials in response to repetitive painful chemical stimulation of the nasal mucosa**

Chemo-somatosensory event-related potentials in response to repetitive painful chemical stimulation of the nasal mucosa**

A comparison of the antinociceptive effects of imipramine, tramadol and anpirtoline [see comments

The pain relieving properties of imipramine (100 mg orally), tramadol (150 mg orally), and anpirtoline (60 mg orally) were compared in 16 healthy subjects in a cross-over, double-blind, randomized, and placebo-controlled study. Anpirtoline exhibits analgesia which is possibly mediated via serotoninergic pathways, whereas tramadol exerts its effects at opioid receptors. The pain-relieving effect of the tricyclic antidepressant imipramine may involve both serotoninergic and opioid mechanisms. Chemo-somatosensory event-related potentials (CSSERP) were recorded after painful stimulation of the nasal mucosa with carbon dioxide. Subjects rated the perceived intensity of the stimuli by means of a visual analogue scale. In addition, acoustically evoked responses were recorded, the spontaneous EEG was analyzed in the frequency domain, the subjects' vigilance was assessed in a tracking task, and side effects of the drugs were monitored. Anpirtoline and tramadol produced a decrease of both CSSERP amplitudes and subjective estimates of pain, the effects of the former compound being greater. In contrast, after administration of imipramine no change of CSSERP amplitudes could be detected, whereas the subjective estimate of pain intensity decreased significantly. This was accompanied by a significant decrease of arousal indicating that pain relief produced by acute administration of imipramine was primarily related to its sedation action. The analgesic properties of anpirtoline were demonstrated in man. Tramadol was characterized as a week opioid analgesic. In contrast, imipramine appeared to produce its pain-relieving effects predominantly by non-specific actions. It is hypothesized that different analgesics may change ERP sources in a drug-specific manner.