Checkpoint Protein Complex Research Articles

Ru360 protects against vitrification-induced oocyte meiotic defects by restoring mitochondrial function

Oocyte vitrification has been widely application in female fertility preservation. Recent studies found that vitrification of immature (germinal vesicle stage, GV) oocytes increased the risk of aneuploidy during meiotic maturation; however, the underlying mechanisms and the strategies to prevent this defect remain unexplored. In this study, we found that vitrification of GV oocytes decreased the first polarbody extrusion rate (90.51 ± 1.04% vs. 63.89 ± 1.39%, p < 0.05) and increased the aneuploid rate (2.50% vs. 20.00%, p < 0.05), accompanied with a series of defects during meiotic maturation, including aberrant spindle morphology, chromosome misalignment, incorrect Kinetochore-Microtubule attachments (KT-MTs) and weakened spindle assembly checkpoint protein complex (SAC) function. We also found that vitrification disrupted mitochondrial function by increasing mitochondrial Ca2+ levels. Importantly, inhibition of mitochondrial Ca2+ entry by 1 μM Ru360 significantly restored mitochondrial function and rescued the meiotic defects, indicating that the increase of mitochondrial Ca2+, at least, was a cause of meiotic defects in vitrified oocytes. These results shed light on the molecular mechanisms of oocyte vitrification-induced adverse effects of meiotic maturation and provided a potential strategy to improve oocyte cryopreservation protocols further.

Using Affinity Pulldown Assays to Study Protein-Protein Interactions of Human NEIL1 Glycosylase and the Checkpoint Protein RAD9-RAD1-HUS1 (9-1-1) Complex.

Affinity pulldown is a powerful technique to discover novel interaction partners and verify a predicted physical association between two or more proteins. Pulldown assays capture a target protein fused with an affinity tag and analyze the complexed proteins. Here, we detail methods of pulldown assays for two high-affinity peptide fusion tags, Flag tag (DYKDDDDK) and hexahistidine tag (6xHis), to study protein-protein interactions of human NEIL1 glycosylase and the checkpoint protein complex RAD9-RAD1-HUS1 (9-1-1). We uncover unique interactions between 9-1-1 and NEIL1, which suggest a possible inhibitory role of the disordered, phosphorylated C-terminal region of RAD9 in regulating NEIL1 activity in base excision repair through lack of physical association of 9-1-1 and NEIL1.

APE2 promotes DNA damage response pathway from a single-strand break.

As the most common type of DNA damage, DNA single-strand breaks (SSBs) are primarily repaired by the SSB repair mechanism. If not repaired properly or promptly, unrepaired SSBs lead to genome stability and have been implicated in cancer and neurodegenerative diseases. However, it remains unknown how unrepaired SSBs are recognized by DNA damage response (DDR) pathway, largely because of the lack of a feasible experimental system. Here, we demonstrate evidence showing that an ATR-dependent checkpoint signaling is activated by a defined plasmid-based site-specific SSB structure in Xenopus HSS (high-speed supernatant) system. Notably, the distinct SSB signaling requires APE2 and canonical checkpoint proteins, including ATR, ATRIP, TopBP1, Rad9 and Claspin. Importantly, the SSB-induced ATR DDR is essential for SSB repair. We and others show that APE2 interacts with PCNA via its PIP box and preferentially interacts with ssDNA via its C-terminus Zf–GRF domain, a conserved motif found in >100 proteins involved in DNA/RNA metabolism. Here, we identify a novel mode of APE2–PCNA interaction via APE2 Zf–GRF and PCNA C-terminus. Mechanistically, the APE2 Zf–GRF–PCNA interaction facilitates 3′-5′ SSB end resection, checkpoint protein complex assembly, and SSB-induced DDR pathway. Together, we propose that APE2 promotes ATR–Chk1 DDR pathway from a single-strand break.

Abstract 5713: PIGN gene expression aberration weakens chromosomal stability via altering its interaction with the spindle assembly checkpoint protein complex during leukemogenesis

Abstract Previous studies have linked increased frequency of glycosylphosphatidylinositol-anchor protein (GPI-AP) deficiency with genomic instability and the risk of carcinogenesis. Recently, Phosphatidylinositol Glycan Anchor Biosynthesis; Class N (PIGN), a gene participating in GPI-AP synthesis, was suggested as a cancer chromosomal instability suppressor in a colon cancer model. We investigated the association of PIGN with genomic instability and leukemogenesis. A Random Forest analysis of the gene expression array data from 55 MDS patients (GSE4619) demonstrated a significant (p = 0.0007) correlation (Pearson r =-0.4068) between GPI-anchor biosynthesis gene expression and genomic instability, in which PIGN was ranked as the third most important in predicting risk of MDS progression. We observed that PIGN gene expression aberrations (increased transcriptional activity but diminished to no protein production) were associated with increased frequency of GPI-AP deficiency in leukemic cells during leukemic transformation/progression. The PIGN gene expression aberrations were attributed to partial intron retentions between exons 14 and 15 resulting in frameshifts and premature termination which were confirmed by examining the RNA-seq data from a group of AML patients (phs001027.v1.p1). PIGN gene expression aberration correlated with the elevation of genomic instability marker expression that was independent of the TP53 regulatory pathway. PIGN protein expression suppression/elimination caused a similar pattern of genomic instability that was rescued by PIGN restoration. Furthermore, PIGN bound to the spindle assembly checkpoint proteins and regulated their expression during the cell cycle. In conclusion, PIGN gene is crucial in the regulation of mitotic integrity to maintain chromosomal stability and prevents leukemic transformation/progression. Citation Format: Jeffrey J. Pu, Emmanuel K. Teye, Abigail Sido, Yuka I. Kawasawa, Ping Xin, Niklas K. Finnberg, Wafik S. El-Deiry, Sara Shimko. PIGN gene expression aberration weakens chromosomal stability via altering its interaction with the spindle assembly checkpoint protein complex during leukemogenesis [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2017; 2017 Apr 1-5; Washington, DC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 5713. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2017-5713

REV1 is important for the ATR-Chk1 DNA damage response pathway in Xenopus egg extracts

The translesion DNA synthesis (TLS) polymerase REV1 is implicated in the bypass of the irreparable DNA damage such as interstrand crosslinks (ICLs). However, the potential role of REV1 in DNA damage response (DDR) pathway has not been determined. In this research communication, we provide evidence to demonstrate that REV1 plays a previously unidentified but important role in the ATR-Chk1 checkpoint activation in response to mitomycin C (MMC)-induced ICLs in Xenopus egg extracts. We further pinpointed that REV1 plays a downstream role of a checkpoint protein complex assembly including ATR, ATRIP, TopBP1 and the Rad9-Rad1-Hus1 complex to MMC-induced ICLs on chromatin in the DDR pathway. Notably, domain dissection analysis demonstrates that a C-terminal domain, but not the individual ubiquitin binding motifs, of REV1 is important for the binding of REV1 to MMC-damaged chromatin and the MMC-induced Chk1 phosphorylation. Yet, the ATR-Chk1 DDR pathway appears to be dispensable for the preferential association of REV1 to MMC-damaged chromatin. Taken together, REV1 is important for the DDR pathway in Xenopus egg extracts.

APE2 is required for ATR-Chk1 checkpoint activation in response to oxidative stress

The base excision repair pathway is largely responsible for the repair of oxidative stress-induced DNA damage. However, it remains unclear how the DNA damage checkpoint is activated by oxidative stress at the molecular level. Here, we provide evidence showing that hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) triggers checkpoint kinase 1 (Chk1) phosphorylation in an ATR [ataxia-telangiectasia mutated (ATM) and Rad3-related]-dependent but ATM-independent manner in Xenopus egg extracts. A base excision repair protein, Apurinic/apyrimidinic (AP) endonuclease 2 (APE2, APN2, or APEX2), is required for the generation of replication protein A (RPA)-bound single-stranded DNA, the recruitment of a checkpoint protein complex [ATR, ATR-interacting protein (ATRIP), and Rad9] to damage sites, and H2O2-induced Chk1 phosphorylation. A conserved proliferating cell nuclear antigen interaction protein box of APE2 is important for the recruitment of APE2 to H2O2-damaged chromatin. APE2 3'-phosphodiesterase and 3'-5' exonuclease activity is essential for single-stranded DNA generation in the 3'-5' direction from single-stranded breaks, referred to as single-stranded break end resection. In addition, APE2 associates with Chk1, and a serine residue (S86) in the Chk1-binding motif of APE2 is essential for Chk1 phosphorylation, indicating a Claspin-like but distinct role for APE2 in ATR-Chk1 signaling. Our data indicate that APE2 plays a vital and previously unexpected role in ATR-Chk1 checkpoint signaling in response to oxidative stress. Thus, our findings shed light on a distinct mechanism of how an ATR-Chk1-dependent DNA damage checkpoint is mediated by APE2 in the oxidative stress response.

Structure of human Mad1 C-terminal domain reveals its involvement in kinetochore targeting

The spindle checkpoint prevents aneuploidy by delaying anaphase onset until all sister chromatids achieve proper microtubule attachment. The kinetochore-bound checkpoint protein complex Mad1-Mad2 promotes the conformational activation of Mad2 and serves as a catalytic engine of checkpoint signaling. How Mad1 is targeted to kinetochores is not understood. Here, we report the crystal structure of the conserved C-terminal domain (CTD) of human Mad1. Mad1 CTD forms a homodimer and, unexpectedly, has a fold similar to those of the kinetochore-binding domains of Spc25 and Csm1. Nonoverlapping Mad1 fragments retain detectable kinetochore targeting. Deletion of the CTD diminishes, does not abolish, Mad1 kinetochore localization. Mutagenesis studies further map the functional interface of Mad1 CTD in kinetochore targeting and implicate Bub1 as its receptor. Our results indicate that CTD is a part of an extensive kinetochore-binding interface of Mad1, and rationalize graded kinetochore targeting of Mad1 during checkpoint signaling.

Structure of Human Mad1 C‐terminal Domain Reveals Its Kinetochore‐Targeting Function

Accurate chromosome segregation during mitosis is critical for maintaining genomic stability. The spindle checkpoint is a cellular surveillance system that ensures the fidelity of chromosome segregation. The kinetochore‐bound checkpoint protein complex Mad1–Mad2 promotes the conformational activation of Mad2 and serves as a catalytic engine of checkpoint signaling. How Mad1 is targeted to kinetochores is not understood, however. To understand the functional importance of the C‐terminal region of Mad1, we solved the crystal structure of human Mad1 C‐terminal domain (CTD) and found that it formed a homodimer and had a fold similar to that of the known kinetochore‐targeting domain of Spc25 (a subunit of the Ndc80 complex). Indeed, Mad1‐ &amp;#8710;CTD was defective in kinetochore targeting in human cells. The mutagenesis studies validate a role of Mad1 CTD in kinetochore targeting and implicate Bub1 as its receptor. Our results thus reveal novel functions of Mad1‐CTD in kinetochore targeting. Deletion of CTD does not abolish Mad1 kinetochore localization, however. Non‐overlapping Mad1 fragments retain detectable kinetochore targeting. Therefore, our results indicate that CTD is a part of an extensive kinetochore‐binding interface of Mad1, and rationalize graded kinetochore targeting of Mad1 during checkpoint signaling.

The Intra-S Phase Checkpoint Protein Tof1 Collaborates with the Helicase Rrm3 and the F-box Protein Dia2 to Maintain Genome Stability in Saccharomyces cerevisiae

The intra-S phase checkpoint protein complex Tof1/Csm3 of Saccharomyces cerevisiae antagonizes Rrm3 helicase to modulate replication fork arrest not only at the replication termini of rDNA but also at strong nonhistone protein binding sites throughout the genome. We investigated whether these checkpoint proteins acted either antagonistically or synergistically with Rrm3 in mediating other important functions such as maintenance of genome stability. High retromobility of a normally quiescent retrovirus-like transposable element Ty1 of S. cerevisiae is a form of genome instability, because the transposition events induce mutations. We measured the transposition of Ty1 in various genetic backgrounds and discovered that Tof1 suppressed excessive retromobility in collaboration with either Rrm3 or the F-box protein Dia2. Although both Rrm3 and Dia2 are believed to facilitate fork movement, fork stalling at DNA-protein complexes did not appear to be a major contributor to enhancement of retromobility. Absence of the aforementioned proteins either individually or in pair-wise combinations caused karyotype changes as revealed by the altered migrations of the individual chromosomes in pulsed field gels. The mobility changes were RNase H-resistant and therefore, unlikely to have been caused by extensive R loop formation. These mutations also resulted in alterations of telomere lengths. However, the latter changes could not fully account for the magnitude of the observed karyotypic alterations. We conclude that unlike other checkpoint proteins that are known to be required for elevated retromobility, Tof1 suppressed high frequency retrotransposition and maintained karyotype stability in collaboration with the aforementioned proteins.

Nek2 targets the mitotic checkpoint proteins Mad2 and Cdc20: A mechanism for aneuploidy in cancer

In mitosis, the duplicated chromosomes are separated and equally distributed to progeny cells under the guidance of the spindle, a dynamic microtubule network. Previous studies revealed a mitotic checkpoint that prevents segregation of the chromosomes until all of the chromosomes are properly attached to microtubules through the kinetochores. A variety of kinetochore-localized proteins, including Mad2 and Cdc20, have been implicated in controlling the mitotic checkpoint. Here we report that both Mad2 and Cdc20 can physically associate with Nek2, a serine/threonine kinase implicated in centrosome functions. We show that, similar to Nek2, the endogenous Cdc20 protein can be detected in the centrosome and the spindle poles. Both Cdc20 and Mad2 can be phosphorylated by Nek2. Moreover, our studies demonstrate that overexpression of Nek2 enhances the ability of Mad2 to induce a delay in mitosis. These observations indicate that Nek2 may act upon the Mad2–Cdc20 protein complex and play a critical role in regulating the mitotic checkpoint protein complex. We propose that overexpression of Nek2 may promote aneuploidy by disrupting the control of the mitotic checkpoint.

Repair activities of human 8-oxoguanine DNA glycosylase are stimulated by the interaction with human checkpoint sensor Rad9–Rad1–Hus1 complex

Rad9–Rad1–Hus1 (9–1–1) is a checkpoint protein complex playing roles in DNA damage sensing, cell cycle arrest, DNA repair or apoptosis. Human 8-oxoguanine DNA glycosylase (hOGG1) is the major DNA glycosylase responsible for repairing a specific aberrantly oxidized nucleotide, 7,8-dihydro-8-oxoguanine (8-oxoG). In this study, we identified a novel interaction between hOGG1 and human 9–1–1, and investigated the functional consequences of this interaction. Co-immunoprecipitation assays using transiently transfected HEK293 cells demonstrated an interaction between hOGG1 and the 9–1–1 proteins. Subsequently, GST pull-down assays using bacterially expressed and purified hOGG1-His and GST-fused 9–1–1 subunits (GST-hRad9, GST-hRad1, and GST-hHus1) demonstrated that hOGG1 interacted directly with the individual subunits of the human 9–1–1 complex. In vitro excision assay, which employed a DNA duplex containing an 8-oxoG/C mismatch, showed that hRad9, hRad1, and hHus1 enhanced the 8-oxoG excision and β-elimination activities of hOGG1. In addition, the presence of hRad9, hRad1, and hHus1 enhanced the formation of covalently cross-linked hOGG1–8-oxoG/C duplex complexes, as determined by a trapping assay using NaBH 4. A trimeric human 9–1–1 complex was purified from Escherichia coli cell transformed with hRad9, His-fused hRad1, or His-fused hHus1 expressing vectors. It also showed the similar activity to enhance in vitro hOGG1 glycosylase activity, compared with individual human 9–1–1 subunits. Detection of 8-oxoG in HEK293 cells using flow cytometric and spectrofluorometric analysis revealed that over-expression of hOGG1 or human 9–1–1 reduced the formation of 8-oxoG residues following the H 2O 2 treatment. The highest 8-oxoG reduction was observed in HEK293 cells over-expressing hOGG1 and all the three subunits of human 9–1–1. These indicate that individual human 9–1–1 subunits and human 9–1–1 complex showed almost the same abilities to enhance the in vitro 8-oxoG excision activity of hOGG1, but that the greatest effect to remove 8-oxoG residues in H 2O 2-treated cells was derived from the 9–1–1 complex as a whole.

Differential mitotic checkpoint protein requirements in somatic and germ cells

Cdc20 (cell division cycle 20) and Cdh1 are the activating subunits of APC (anaphase-promoting complex), an E3-ubiquitin ligase that drives cells into anaphase by inducing degradation of cyclin B and the anaphase inhibitor securin. To prevent chromosome missegregation due to early degradation of cyclin B and securin, mitotic checkpoint protein complexes consisting of BubR1, Bub3 and Mad2 bind to and inhibit APC(Cdc20) until all chromosomes are properly attached to the mitotic spindle and aligned in the metaphase plate. The nuclear transport factors Rae1 and Nup98, which convert into mitotic checkpoint proteins in M-phase, further prevent chromosome missegregation by assembling into a complex with APC(Cdh1) and delaying APC(Cdh1)-mediated ubiquitination of securin. Disruption of Mad2, BubR1, Bub3 or Rae1 in mice results in substantial aneuploidy in somatic tissues, but whether these genes are equally important for accurate chromosome segregation during meiosis has not yet been established. To address this issue, we generated cohorts of male mice in which Mad2, BubR1, Bub3, Rae1 and Nup98 were disrupted either individually or in combination. We tested the fertility of these mice and performed chromosome counts on secondary spermatocytes. We found that male fertility and accurate chromosome segregation during spermatogenesis are highly dependent on BubR1, but not Mad2, Bub3, Rae1 and Nup98. Our results suggest that the mechanisms ensuring accurate chromosome segregation differ between mitotic and meiotic cells.

The Tof1p–Csm3p protein complex counteracts the Rrm3p helicase to control replication termination of Saccharomyces cerevisiae

Termination of replication forks at the natural termini of the rDNA of Saccharomyces cerevisiae is controlled in a sequence-specific and polar mode by the interaction of the Fob1p replication terminator protein with the tandem Ter sites located in the nontranscribed spacers. Here we show, by both 2D gel analyses and chromatin immunoprecipitations (ChIP), that there exists a second level of global control mediated by the intra-S-phase checkpoint protein complex of Tof1p and Csm3p that protect stalled forks at Ter sites against the activity of the Rrm3p helicase ("sweepase"). The sweepase tends to release arrested forks presumably by the transient displacement of the Ter-bound Fob1p. Consistent with this mechanism, very few replication forks were arrested at the natural replication termini in the absence of the two checkpoint proteins. In the absence of the Rrm3p helicase, there was a slight enhancement of fork arrest at the Ter sites. Simultaneous deletions of the TOF1 (or CSM3), and the RRM3 genes restored fork arrest by removing both the fork-releasing and fork-protection activities. Other genes such as MRC1, WSS1, and PSY2 that are also involved in the MRC1 checkpoint pathway were not involved in this global control. This observation suggests that Tof1p-Csm3p function differently from MRC1 and the other above-mentioned genes. This mechanism is not restricted to the natural Ter sites but was also observed at fork arrest caused by the meeting of a replication fork with transcription approaching from the opposite direction.

Phosphorylation of Histone H2AX and Activation of Mre11, Rad50, and Nbs1 in Response to Replication-dependent DNA Double-strand Breaks Induced by Mammalian DNA Topoisomerase I Cleavage Complexes

DNA double-strand breaks originating from diverse causes in eukaryotic cells are accompanied by the formation of phosphorylated H2AX (gammaH2AX) foci. Here we show that gammaH2AX formation is also a cellular response to topoisomerase I cleavage complexes known to induce DNA double-strand breaks during replication. In HCT116 human carcinoma cells exposed to the topoisomerase I inhibitor camptothecin, the resulting gammaH2AX formation can be prevented with the phosphatidylinositol 3-OH kinase-related kinase inhibitor wortmannin; however, in contrast to ionizing radiation, only camptothecin-induced gammaH2AX formation can be prevented with the DNA replication inhibitor aphidicolin and enhanced with the checkpoint abrogator 7-hydroxystaurosporine. This gammaH2AX formation is suppressed in ATR (ataxia telangiectasia and Rad3-related) deficient cells and markedly decreased in DNA-dependent protein kinase-deficient cells but is not abrogated in ataxia telangiectasia cells, indicating that ATR and DNA-dependent protein kinase are the kinases primarily involved in gammaH2AX formation at the sites of replication-mediated DNA double-strand breaks. Mre11- and Nbs1-deficient cells are still able to form gammaH2AX. However, H2AX-/- mouse embryonic fibroblasts exposed to camptothecin fail to form Mre11, Rad50, and Nbs1 foci and are hypersensitive to camptothecin. These results demonstrate a conserved gammaH2AX response for double-strand breaks induced by replication fork collision. gammaH2AX foci are required for recruiting repair and checkpoint protein complexes to the replication break sites.

Clamp and clamp loader structures of the human checkpoint protein complexes, Rad9-1-1 and Rad17-RFC.

We have reported that protein imaging by transmission electron microscope observation based on low-angle platinum shadowing can reproduce characteristic ring structures of the replication clamp, proliferating cell nuclear antigen (PCNA), and the clamp loader protein, replication factor C (RFC). The checkpoint protein complexes, Rad9-Hus1-Rad1 (Rad9-1-1) and Rad17-RFCs2-5 (Rad17-RFC), have been predicted to function as novel clamp and clamp loader proteins, respectively, due to their amino acid sequence similarities with PCNA and RFC. We reconstituted human Rad9-1-1 and Rad17-RFC complexes in insect cells using a baculovirus expression system and showed purified Rad9-1-1 to be composed of equimolar amounts of Rad9, Hus1 and Rad1 proteins, exhibiting a native molecular mass of 100 kDa, in line with a trimeric complex. When Rad17 was co-expressed with the four small subunits of RFC in insect cells, these proteins formed a complex of 240 kDa that displayed DNA binding, ATPase activity and binding to its predicted target protein, Rad9-1-1. Analyses of the molecular architecture of Rad9-1-1 and Rad17-RFC using transmission electron microscopy, in comparison with PCNA and RFC, revealed the Rad9-1-1 complex to have a characteristic ring structure indistinguishable from that of PCNA in shape and size. In addition, the Rad17-RFC complex was found to be oval in structure and 26 x 22 nm in size with a cleft, reminiscent of the structure of RFC. Our direct comparison of images from the two sets of clamp and clamp loader proteins indicated that Rad9-1-1 and Rad17-RFC are, respectively, structural orthologs of PCNA and RFC, with presumed functions as novel clamp and clamp-loader proteins in eukaryotes.

Regulation of ATR substrate selection by Rad17-dependent loading of Rad9 complexes onto chromatin

Cells respond to DNA damage by activating a network of signaling pathways that control cell cycle progression and DNA repair. Genetic studies in yeast suggested that several checkpoint proteins, including the RFC-related Rad17 protein, and the PCNA-related Rad1-Rad9-Hus1 protein complex might function as sensors of DNA damage. In this study, we show that the human Rad17 protein recruits the Rad9 protein complex onto chromatin after damage. Rad17 binds to chromatin prior to damage and is phosphorylated by ATR on chromatin after damage but Rad17's phosphorylation is not required for Rad9 loading onto chromatin. The chromatin associations of Rad17 and ATR are largely independent, which suggests that they localize to DNA damage independently. Furthermore, the phosphorylation of Rad17 requires Hus1, suggesting that the Rad1-Rad9-Hus1 complex recruited by Rad17 enables ATR to recognize its substrates. Our data are consistent with a model in which multiple checkpoint protein complexes localize to sites of DNA damage independently and interact to trigger the checkpoint-signaling cascade.

Bub3 interaction with Mad2, Mad3 and Cdc20 is mediated by WD40 repeats and does not require intact kinetochores.

The kinetochore checkpoint pathway, involving the Mad1, Mad2, Mad3, Bub1, Bub3 and Mps1 proteins, prevents anaphase entry and mitotic exit by inhibiting the anaphase promoting complex activator Cdc20 in response to monopolar attachment of sister kinetochores to spindle fibres. We show here that Cdc20, which had previously been shown to interact physically with Mad2 and Mad3, associates also with Bub3 and association is up-regulated upon checkpoint activation. Moreover, co-fractionation experiments suggest that Mad2, Mad3 and Bub3 may be concomitantly present in protein complexes with Cdc20. Formation of the Bub3-Cdc20 complex requires all kinetochore checkpoint proteins but, surprisingly, not intact kinetochores. Conversely, point mutations altering the conserved WD40 motifs of Bub3, which might be involved in the formation of a beta-propeller fold devoted to protein-protein interactions, disrupt its association with Mad2, Mad3 and Cdc20, as well as proper checkpoint response. We suggest that Bub3 could serve as a platform for interactions between kinetochore checkpoint proteins, and its association with Mad2, Mad3 and Cdc20 might be instrumental for checkpoint activation.

Modes of spindle pole body inheritance and segregation of the Bfa1p-Bub2p checkpoint protein complex.

Yeast spindle pole bodies (SPBs) duplicate once per cell cycle by a conservative mechanism resulting in a pre-existing 'old' and a newly formed SPB. The two SPBs of yeast cells are functionally distinct. It is only the SPB that migrates into the daughter cell, the bud, which carries the Bfa1p-Bub2p GTPase-activating protein (GAP) complex, a component of the spindle positioning checkpoint. We investigated whether the functional difference of the two SPBs correlates with the time of their assembly. We describe that in unperturbed cells the 'old' SPB always migrates into the bud. However, Bfa1p localization is not determined by SPB inheritance. It is the differential interaction of cytoplasmic microtubules with the mother and bud cortex that directs the Bfa1p-Bub2p GAP to the bud-ward-localized SPB. In response to defects of cytoplasmic microtubules to interact with the cell cortex, the Bfa1p-Bub2p complex binds to both SPBs. This may provide a mechanism to delay cell cycle progression when cytoplasmic microtubules fail to orient the spindle. Thus, SPBs are able to sense cytoplasmic microtubule properties and regulate the Bfa1p-Bub2p GAP accordingly.

Checkpoint and DNA-repair proteins are associated with the cores of mammalian meiotic chromosomes

Meiotic checkpoints are manifested through protein complexes capable of detecting an abnormality in chromosome metabolism and signaling it to effector molecules that subsequently delay or arrest the progression of meiosis. Some checkpoints act during the first meiotic prophase to monitor the repair of chromosomal DSBs, predominantly by meiotic recombination, or to ensure the correct establishment of synapsis and its well-timed dissolution. In mammals, a number of checkpoint and repair proteins localize to the meiotic chromosomal cores, sometimes in the context of the synaptonemal complex (SC). Here we discuss possible functions of these proteins in the accomplishment of meiotic recombination and normal progression of the meiotic pathway. Also, we present arguments for a structural role of cores and SCs in the assembly of the repair and checkpoint protein complexes on the chromosomes.

Components of the human spindle checkpoint control mechanism localize specifically to the active centromere on dicentric chromosomes.

The spindle checkpoint control mechanism functions to ensure faithful chromosome segregation by delaying cell division until all chromosomes are correctly oriented on the mitotic spindle. Initially identified in budding yeast, several mammalian spindle checkpoint-associated proteins have recently been identified and partially characterized. These proteins associate with all active human centromeres, including neocentromeres, in the early stages of mitosis prior to the commencement of anaphase. We have examined the status of proteins associated with the checkpoint protein complex (BUB1, BUBR1, BUB3, MAD2), the anaphase-promoting complex (Tsg24, p55CDC), and other proteins associated with mitotic checkpoint control (ERK1, 3F3/2 epitope, hZW10), on a human dicentric chromosome. Each of these proteins was found to specifically associate with only the active centromere, suggesting that only active centromeres participate in the spindle checkpoint. This finding complements previous studies on multicentric chromosomes demonstrating specific association of structural and motor-related centromere proteins with active centromeres, and suggests that centromere inactivation is accompanied by loss of all functionally important centromere proteins.