Checkpoint Inhibitors In Patients Research Articles

Safety and efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors in patients with pre-treatment reduced left ventricular function

Abstract Background Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have revolutionized the clinical outcomes of cancer. Nevertheless, the response varies across populations and their use may lead to ICIs-related adverse events (irAEs), including cardiovascular (CV) irAEs, which can be life-threatening. Limited evidence exists regarding the safety and efficacy of ICIs therapy in patients presenting with pre-treatment reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). Objectives To evaluate the safety and efficacy of ICIs therapy in patients with pre-treatment reduced LVEF. Methods Retrospective single center cohort of patients treated with ICIs therapy, who performed pre-treatment LVEF assessment. The primary endpoint was to evaluate the safety of ICIs among this population, assessed by CV irAEs (composite of myocarditis, acute coronary syndrome, heart failure, and arrhythmia). The secondary endpoint was to evaluate the efficacy of ICIs, assessed by all-cause mortality and progression-free survival (PFS). Results The cohort included 307 patients with 30 (10%) patients presenting with pre-treatment reduced LVEF, with a mean LVEF of 39±7%. While a significantly higher prevalence of CV irAEs was observed in the reduced LVEF group (37% vs. 14%, p=0.004), following a multivariable cox regression analysis including baseline cardiovascular diseases and risk factors, pre-treatment reduced LVEF did not remain a significant predictor (p=0.635). No significant differences were observed between the groups regarding all-cause mortality and PFS. Conclusions Pre-treatment reduced LVEF was found to be safe with no significant impact on efficacy among patients treated with ICIs.

Dual Immune Checkpoint Inhibition in Patients With Aggressive Thyroid Carcinoma

Aggressive thyroid carcinoma, including radioiodine refractory (RAIR) differentiated thyroid carcinoma (DTC), medullary thyroid carcinoma (MTC), and anaplastic thyroid carcinoma (ATC), are associated with significant morbidity and mortality and have limited therapeutic options. Distinct immune profiles have been identified in thyroid cancer subtypes suggesting they may be susceptible to immune checkpoint inhibition. To evaluate the efficacy of anti-programmed cell death 1 nivolumab and anti-cytotoxic lymphocyte-associated protein 4 ipilimumab in patients with aggressive thyroid carcinoma. This phase 2 nonrandomized clinical trial enrolled patients with RAIR DTC in a single center from October 2017 to May 2019, with exploratory cohorts in MTC and ATC. The data were analyzed between June 2021 and September 2023. Intravenous nivolumab, 3 mg/kg, every 2 weeks and ipilimumab, 1 mg/kg, every 6 weeks until disease progression, intolerable adverse events, or a maximum duration of 2 years. The primary end point of the study was objective response rate (ORR) in RAIR DTC, which was scored according to RECIST (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours), version 1.1. Key secondary end points included safety, progression-free survival, overall survival, and biomarker analyses. A total of 51 patients were registered, and 49 patients were evaluable for analysis. The median (range) age was 65 years (30-88 years), and 25 participants (51%) were female. ORR in the DTC cohort was 9.4% (3/32 [95% CI, 2.8%-28.5%]), with all partial responses in either oncocytic carcinoma (2/6 [33.0%]) or poorly differentiated thyroid carcinoma (1/5 [20.0%]). Clinical benefit rates were 62.5% (20/32) in the overall DTC cohort, including 83.3% (5/6) in oncocytic carcinoma and 40% (2/5) in poorly differentiated thyroid carcinoma. ORR in the exploratory ATC cohort was 30.0% (3/10 [95% CI, 6.7%-65.2%]), with a clinical benefit rates of 50.0% (5/10). No responses were observed in the exploratory MTC cohort. The safety profile was similar to prior reports with dual immune checkpoint inhibition (pruritus, rash, diarrhea, fatigue, and elevation of lipase and liver enzymes). The presence of NRAS tumor genetic sequence variations, but not BRAF V600E, was associated with worse outcomes. This phase 2 nonrandomized clinical trial reported clinical activity of dual immune checkpoint inhibition in aggressive thyroid cancer. The study did not meet its end point in the primary population of RAIR DTC and does not support further investigation in non-biomarker-selected DTC. However, the signal observed in ATC may merit further evaluation. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03246958.

Efficacy and safety of combining radiotherapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors in patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a real-world study

Background The significance of local radiotherapy (RT) in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is well documented. However, the advent of immunotherapy has raised questions regarding the synergistic survival benefits or potential adverse effects. Objective This study aimed to explore whether a combination of RT and systematic immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) can improve the survival outcomes for NSCLC patients. Methods Based on collected data patients who received RT were defined as the RT group, and those who had not for any site were defined as the non-RT group. Propensity score matching (PSM) was employed to mitigate bias. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS), with secondary endpoints including overall survival (OS) and treatment-related adverse events (AEs). Results Out of 709 patients (235 in RT group and 474 in non-RT group) were included, with 213 patients per group. The median PFS of the RT group was better than that of the non-RT group (13.8 months versus 9.5 months; p < 0.0001), although no superiority in median overall survival (OS) of the RT group was observed (p = 0.715). However, among the cohort of patients with ≤3 metastases, the median OS of the RT group improved significantly (HR = 0.60, [95% CI 0.44–0.83]; p = 0.004). Treatment-related AEs occurred in 94.5% of RT group patients and in 94.9% of non-RT group patients (p = 0.792), which indicated no observable increase in AEs from RT. Conclusions These results demonstrate the tolerability of RT when administered along with immunotherapy, suggesting its potential to positively impact the survival outcomes of NSCLC patients.

Oncolytic Coxsackievirus B3 Strain PD-H Is Effective Against a Broad Spectrum of Pancreatic Cancer Cell Lines and Induces a Growth Delay in Pancreatic KPC Cell Tumors In Vivo

Pancreatic cancer is one of the deadliest cancers globally, with limited success from existing therapies, including chemotherapies and immunotherapies like checkpoint inhibitors for patients with advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC). A promising new approach is the use of oncolytic viruses (OV), a form of immunotherapy that has been demonstrated clinical effectiveness in various cancers. Here we investigated the potential of the oncolytic coxsackievirus B3 strain (CVB3) PD-H as a new treatment for pancreatic cancer. In vitro, PD-H exhibited robust replication, as measured by plaque assays, and potent lytic activity, as assessed by XTT assays, in most pancreatic tumor cell lines, outperforming two other coxsackievirus strains tested, H3N-375/1TS and CVA21. Thus, H3N-375/1TS showed efficient replication and lytic efficiency in distinctly fewer tumor cell lines, while most tumor cells were resistant to CVA21. The oncolytic efficiency of the three OV largely correlated with mRNA expression levels of viral receptors and their ability to induce apoptosis, as measured by cleaved caspase 3/7 activity in the tumor cells. In a syngeneic mouse model with subcutaneous pancreatic tumors, intratumoral administration of PD-H significantly inhibited tumor growth but did not completely stop tumor progression. Importantly, no virus-related side effects were observed. Although pancreatic tumors respond to PD-H treatment, its therapeutic efficacy is limited. Combining PD-H with other treatments, such as those aiming at reducing the desmoplastic stroma which impedes viral infection and spread within the tumor, may enhance its efficacy.

Prognostic risk score and index including the platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio and lactate dehydrogenase in patients with metastatic or unresectable urothelial carcinoma treated with immune checkpoint inhibitors.

Avelumab and pembrolizumab are administered after platinum-based chemotherapy for the treatment of metastatic urothelial carcinoma. We explored the prognostic factors and risk scores for predicting the outcomes of metastatic or unresectable urothelial carcinoma at the start of treatment with immune checkpoint inhibitors. This retrospective study included patients with metastatic or unresectable urothelial carcinoma treated with avelumab or pembrolizumab after platinum-based chemotherapy between January 2017 and December 2022. Prognostic factors, including patient and tumor characteristics and blood data at the initiation of immune checkpoint inhibitor therapy, were examined. This study included 36 and 207 patients treated with avelumab and pembrolizumab, respectively, for metastatic or unresectable urothelial carcinoma. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, presence of visceral metastases, platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio and lactate dehydrogenase levels were independent prognostic factors for predicting overall survival. The median overall survival of patients in the risk-score model was 58.5months (score zero), 27.9months (one), 13.1months (two) and 3.9months (three or higher). The C-index for overall survival was 0.718 for the newly developed risk score compared with 0.679 for the Bellmunt score and 0.703 for the Bellmunt-C-reactive protein score. Additionally, the C-index for overall survival using the immune prognostic index derived from lactate dehydrogenase and the platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio was 0.646 compared with 0.615 for the Lung Immune Prognostic Index. A risk score that includes the platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio and lactate dehydrogenase may serve as a useful model for predicting prognosis following the initiation of immune checkpoint inhibitors in patients with metastatic or unresectable urothelial carcinoma.

P2.11B.05 Effect of Dysbiosis-Inducing Drugs on the Response to Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Patients with NSCLC

P2.11B.05 Effect of Dysbiosis-Inducing Drugs on the Response to Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Patients with NSCLC

Faecalibacterium prausnitzii is associated with clinical response to immune checkpoint inhibitors in patients with advanced gastric adenocarcinoma: results of microbiota analysis of PRODIGE 59-FFCD 1707-DURIGAST trial

Faecalibacterium prausnitzii is associated with clinical response to immune checkpoint inhibitors in patients with advanced gastric adenocarcinoma: results of microbiota analysis of PRODIGE 59-FFCD 1707-DURIGAST trial

Pathological response following neoadjuvant immune checkpoint inhibitors in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma: a cross-trial, patient-level analysis

Neoadjuvant use of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) before liver resection results in pathological tumour regression in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma. We aimed to describe the characteristics of pathological responses after preoperative ICI therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma and to evaluate the association between the depth of tumour regression and relapse-free survival. In this cross-trial, patient-level analysis, we performed a pooled analysis of data from patients with hepatocellular carcinoma receiving ICI therapy before liver resection as part of a global collaborative consortium (NeoHCC) of five phase 1 and 2 clinical trials and standardised observational protocols conducted in 12 tertiary referral centres across the USA, UK, and Taiwan. Eligible patients were adults (aged ≥18 years) diagnosed with hepatocellular carcinoma by tissue core biopsy before treatment initiation, a Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System score of 5 on imaging, or both, with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status score of 0-1, and no extrahepatic spread or previous ICI treatment. Pathological response was measured as the percentage of non-viable tumour in the resected surgical specimen, with major pathological response corresponding to at least 70% tumour regression and pathological complete response corresponding to 100% tumour regression. We correlated pathological response with radiological overall response using RECIST criteria (version 1.1) and relapse-free survival, and evaluated the threshold of tumour regression that could be optimally associated with relapse-free survival. At data cutoff on Jan 31, 2024, 111 patients were included in the study, of whom data on pathological response were available for 104 (94%) patients. Patients received treatment from Oct 5, 2017, to Nov 15, 2023, mostly ICI combinations (76 [69%]), for a median of 1·4 months (IQR 0·7-2·9). 87 (78%) patients were men and 24 (22%) were women. Most patients had underlying viral chronic liver disease (73 [66%]) and Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer stage A hepatocellular carcinoma (61 [55%]), without portal vein thrombosis (87 [78%]). We observed major pathological response in 33 (32%) patients and pathological complete response in 19 (18%) patients. Radiological overall response was associated with major pathological response, with 23 (74%) of 31 patients with radiological response showing major pathological response compared with ten (14%) of 73 patients without radiological response (p<0·0001). However, ten (30%) of 33 major pathological responses were not predicted by radiological response. After a median follow-up of 27·2 months (95% CI 22·3-32·1), median relapse-free survival for the whole cohort was 43·6 months (95% CI 28·3-not evaluable). Relapse-free survival was significantly longer in patients with major pathological response than in those who did not have a major pathological response (not reached [95% CI not evaluable-not evaluable] vs 28·3 months [12·8-43·8]; hazard ratio 0·26 [0·10-0·66]; p=0·0024) and in patients with pathological complete response than in those who did not have a pathological complete response (NR [95% CI not evaluable-not evaluable] vs 32·8 months [15·0-50·5]; 0·19 [0·05-0·78]; p=0·010). Unbiased recursive partitioning of the cohort for the risk of relapse, death, or both identified a threshold of 90% as the optimal cutoff of pathological tumour regression to predict improved relapse-free survival. The extent of tumour regression following neoadjuvant ICI therapy could identify patients with improved relapse-free survival following liver resection. The threshold of at least 90% tumour regression should be validated for its surrogate role for relapse-free survival in phase 3 randomised controlled trials. None.

Hypoalbuminemia and hypercalcemia are independently associated with poor treatment outcomes of anti-PD-1 immune checkpoint inhibitors in patients with recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma

BackgroundRecent randomized phase III trials have demonstrated the efficacy of anti-programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in treating patients with recurrent or metastatic head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (RMHNSCC). However, a large proportion of such patients still have poor response. This study aimed to identify biomarkers for predicting anti-PD-1 ICI treatment outcomes .MethodsWe retrospectively analyzed 144 patients with RMHNSCC who received anti-PD-1 ICIs after progression to platinum-based chemotherapy between January 2017 and December 2022 at Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital. Data on clinicopathological parameters, albumin levels, calcium levels, and other pretreatment peripheral blood biomarkers, including total lymphocyte count, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR), platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR), lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (LMR), and prognostic nutritional index (PNI) were collected and correlated with the treatment outcome of anti-PD-1 ICIs.ResultsLow tumor proportion score (TPS), low combined positive score (CPS), NLR ≥ 5, PLR ≥ 300, hypercalcemia, hypoalbuminemia, and PNI < 45 were significantly correlated with poor response of ICIs. The overall response rates were 25% and 3% in patients with calcium < 10 mg/dL and calcium ≥ 10 mg/dL, respectively (P = 0.007). The overall response rates were 6% and 33% in patients with albumin < 4 g/dL and albumin ≥ 4 g/dL, respectively (P < 0.001). Univariate survival analysis showed that low TPS, low CPS, NLR ≥ 5,, hypercalcemia, hypoalbuminemia, and PNI < 45 were significantly associated with worse progression-free survival (PFS) and inferior overall survival (OS). Multivariate analysis revealed that calcium ≥ 10 mg/dL and albumin < 4 g/dL were independent poor prognosticators for worse PFS and inferior OS. The two-year OS rates were 26% and 9% in patients with calcium < 10 mg/dL and ≥ 10 mg/dL, respectively (P < 0.001). The two-year OS rates were 10% and 33% in patients with albumin < 4 g/dL and ≥ 4 g/dL, respectively (P < 0.001).ConclusionsHypercalcemia and hypoalbuminemia can potentially predict poor treatment outcomes of anti-PD-1 ICIs in patients with RMHNSCC. Blood calcium and albumin levels may be helpful in individualizing treatment strategies for patients with RMHNSCC.

Artificial Intelligence-Powered Spatial Analysis of Tumor-Infiltrating Lymphocytes as a Potential Biomarker for Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Patients with Biliary Tract Cancer.

Recently, anti-programmed cell death-1/anti-programmed cell death ligand-1 (anti-PD1/L1) immunotherapy has been demonstrated for its efficacy when combined with cytotoxic chemotherapy in randomized phase 3 trials for advanced biliary tract cancer (BTC). However, no biomarker predictive of benefit has been established for anti-PD1/L1 in BTC. Here, we evaluated tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TIL) using artificial intelligence-powered immune phenotype (AI-IP) analysis in advanced BTC treated with anti-PD1. Pretreatment hematoxylin and eosin (H&E)-stained whole-slide images from 339 patients with advanced BTC who received anti-PD1 as second-line treatment or beyond, were employed for AI-IP analysis and correlative analysis between AI-IP and efficacy outcomes with anti-PD1. Next, data and images of the BTC cohort from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) were additionally analyzed to evaluate the transcriptomic and mutational characteristics of various AI-IP in BTC. Overall, AI-IP were classified as inflamed [high intratumoral TIL (iTIL)] in 40 patients (11.8%), immune-excluded (low iTIL and high stromal TIL) in 167 patients (49.3%), and immune-desert (low TIL overall) in 132 patients (38.9%). The inflamed IP group showed a substantially higher overall response rate compared with the noninflamed IP groups (27.5% vs. 7.7%, P < 0.001). Median overall survival and progression-free survival were significantly longer in the inflamed IP group than in the noninflamed IP group (OS, 12.6 vs. 5.1 months; P = 0.002; PFS, 4.5 vs. 1.9 months; P < 0.001). In the TCGA cohort analysis, the inflamed IP showed increased cytolytic activity scores and IFNγ signature compared with the noninflamed IP. AI-IP based on spatial TIL analysis was effective in predicting the efficacy outcomes in patients with BTC treated with anti-PD1 therapy. Further validation is necessary in the context of anti-PD1/L1 plus gemcitabine-cisplatin.

1072TiP Phase I/II dose escalation/expansion trial to evaluate safety and preliminary efficacy of DuoBody-EpCAM×4-1BB (BNT314/GEN1059) alone or in combination with an immune checkpoint inhibitor in patients with malignant solid tumors

1072TiP Phase I/II dose escalation/expansion trial to evaluate safety and preliminary efficacy of DuoBody-EpCAM×4-1BB (BNT314/GEN1059) alone or in combination with an immune checkpoint inhibitor in patients with malignant solid tumors

1848P Safety and efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors in patients with cancer and hepatitis B: Multicentre experience

1848P Safety and efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors in patients with cancer and hepatitis B: Multicentre experience

1847P Safety and efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors in patients over 85 years: ICIPO85 study

1847P Safety and efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors in patients over 85 years: ICIPO85 study

Immune checkpoint inhibitors for patients with mismatch-repair deficient or microsatellite instability-high advanced cancers: a meta-analysis of phase I-III clinical trials.

Mismatch-repair deficient (dMMR) and microsatellite instability-high (MSI-H) cancers are associated with an increased number of somatic mutations, which can render tumors more susceptible to immune checkpoint blockade. However, a comprehensive evaluation of the efficacy profile of immune checkpoint inhibitors in this patient population across multiple cancer types is lacking. This study aims to address this knowledge gap by synthesizing data from Phase I-III clinical trials. A systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and Google Scholar from inception until June, 2024. Eligible studies included randomized controlled trials (RCTs), non-randomized comparative studies, and single-arm trials investigating immune checkpoint inhibitors in patients with dMMR/MSI-H advanced cancers. The primary outcome was objective response rate (ORR), and the secondary outcomes included disease control rate (DCR), 1-year, 2-year, and 3-year overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) rates. Subgroup analyses were conducted for the primary outcome stratified by major study characteristics. Of the 10802 identified studies, 19 trials in 25 studies totaling 2052 participants met the inclusion criteria and were included in the meta-analysis. The pooled ORR was 41.7% (95% CI, 35.7%-47.7%). The pooled DCR was 68.9% (95% CI, 62.2%-75.7%). The pooled 12-month, 24-month and 36-month OS rates were 29.1% (95% CI, 19.9%-38.3%), 35.8% (95% CI, 23.6%-48.0%), and 35.8% (95% CI, 23.6%-48.0%), respectively. The pooled 12-month, 24-month and 36-month PFS rates were 46.4% (95% CI, 39.1%-53.8%), 67.0% (95% CI, 55.2%-78.8%), and 63.1% (95% CI, 37.3%-88.9%), respectively. The study establishes the therapeutic potential of immune checkpoint inhibitors in dMMR/MSI-H advanced cancers, highlighting the importance of MSI status in this context. Further head-to-head comparisons are needed to conclusively determine MSI's predictive power relative to proficient mismatch-repair/ microsatellite stable (pMMR/MSS) tumors.

Clinical characteristics and prognosis of liver injury induced by immune checkpoint inhibitors in patients with malignancies: A real-world retrospective study.

Programmed cell death receptor (ligand)-1 inhibitors (PD-(L)1), as the preferred immunotherapy, have been widely used in the Chinese mainland and drug-induced liver injury (DILI) has been reported. The study aimed to investigate the clinical features or risk factors for immunotherapy-related DILI. Patients who received PD-(L)1 inhibitors from January 2020 to July 2021 were retrospectively reviewed. The likelihood of DILI was adjudicated by the Roussel-Uclaf causality assessment. A total of 1175 patients were included in the study and 89 patients (7.6%) developed DILI, of which 12 (13.5%) progressed to acute liver failure (ALF) and three (3.4%) died. Among the DILI population, 56 (62.9%) had a cholestatic pattern and exhibited a prolonged treatment course and duration for resolution compared to the hepatocellular and mixed patterns. Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), hepatitis B virus (HBV) and abnormal baseline of alkaline phosphatase (ALP) had increased risks of DILI by 2.1-fold (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.231-3.621), 1.9-fold [95% CI, 1.123-3.325] and 2.1-fold [95% CI, 1.317-3.508], respectively. The model for end-stage liver disease (MELD) score had a c-statistic of 0.894 (95% CI, 0.778-1.000) with a sensitivity of 67% and a specificity of 95% for poor outcomes. COX analysis showed that the MELD ≥ 18 was predictive of immunotherapy-related ALF or death. PD-(L)1 inhibitor-related liver injury manifests primarily as a cholestatic pattern, on which corticosteroid treatment has minimal effect compared to hepatocellular and mixed patterns. MELD score ≥ 18 at the time of liver injury performed best in the prediction of ALF or death in immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-related DILI.

Intratumoral Escherichia Is Associated With Improved Survival to Single-Agent Immune Checkpoint Inhibition in Patients With Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer.

PURPOSEThe impact of the intratumoral microbiome on immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) efficacy in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is unknown. Preclinically, intratumoral Escherichia is associated with a proinflammatory tumor microenvironment and decreased metastases. We sought to determine whether intratumoral Escherichia is associated with outcome to ICI in patients with NSCLC.PATIENTS AND METHODSWe examined the intratumoral microbiome in 958 patients with advanced NSCLC treated with ICI by querying unmapped next-generation sequencing reads against a bacterial genome database. Putative environmental contaminants were filtered using no-template controls (n = 2,378). The impact of intratumoral Escherichia detection on overall survival (OS) was assessed using univariable and multivariable analyses. The findings were further validated in an external independent cohort of 772 patients. Escherichia fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) and transcriptomic profiling were performed.RESULTSIn the discovery cohort, read mapping to intratumoral Escherichia was associated with significantly longer OS (16 v 11 months; hazard ratio, 0.73 [95% CI, 0.59 to 0.92]; P = .0065) in patients treated with single-agent ICI, but not combination chemoimmunotherapy. The association with OS in the single-agent ICI cohort remained statistically significant in multivariable analysis adjusting for prognostic features including PD-L1 expression (P = .023). Analysis of an external validation cohort confirmed the association with improved OS in univariable and multivariable analyses of patients treated with single-agent ICI, and not in patients treated with chemoimmunotherapy. Escherichia localization within tumor cells was supported by coregistration of FISH staining and serial hematoxylin and eosin sections. Transcriptomic analysis correlated Escherichia-positive samples with expression signatures of immune cell infiltration.CONCLUSIONRead mapping to potential intratumoral Escherichia was associated with survival to single-agent ICI in two independent cohorts of patients with NSCLC.

Blood Tumor Mutational Burden Alone Is Not a Good Predictive Biomarker for Response to Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Patients With Gastrointestinal Tumors.

There has been a controversy about the predictive value of tissue-TMB-H for immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) with limited data regarding blood-TMB (bTMB) in GI tumors. We aim to evaluate the predictive value of bTMB compared with MSI-H in GI tumors. Patients with unresectable/metastatic GI cancer, harboring either MSS with bTMB-H (≥10mut/Mb) or dMMR/MSI-H who received ICI were included. We compared ICIs' efficacy between MSS-bTMB-H (N=45) versus MSI-H (N=50) in GI tumors. Ninety-five patients were identified with the majority having colorectal (49.5%) or esophagogastric (34.7%) cancers. MSS-bTMB-H group had more esophagogastric cancer and later-line ICI recipients, with no significant differences in other known prognostic variables. At a median follow-up of 9.4 months, MSI-H group showed superior ORR (58.0% vs. 26.7%), DCR (84.0% vs. 42.2%), DoR (not-reached vs. 7.6mo), PFS (22.5 vs. 3.8mo), and OS (Not-reached vs. 10.1mo) compared with MSS-bTMB-H. Multivariable analysis showed that MSI-H was an independent favorable factor over MSS-bTMB-H for PFS (HR=0.31, CI 0.15-0.63, P =0.001) and OS (HR=0.33, CI 0.14-0.80, P =0.014). MSI-H group showed favorable outcomes compared with MSS-bTMB-16+ (ORR: 58.0% vs. 26.9%; DCR: 84.0% vs. 42.3%; PFS:22.5 vs. 4.0mo) and MSS-bTMB-20+ (ORR: 58.0% vs. 31.6%; DCR: 84.0% vs. 42.1%; PFS:22.5 vs. 3.2mo). There was no difference between MSS-bTMB10-15 compared with MSS-bTMB-16+ in ORR, DCR, and PFS, or between MSS-bTMB10-19 compared with MSS-bTMB20+. Regardless of bTMB cutoff at 10, 16, or 20, bTMB-H did not appear to be a predictive biomarker in MSS GI tumors in this retrospective analysis.

Efficacy of chemotherapy plus immune checkpoint inhibitors in patients with non-small cell lung cancer who have rare oncogenic driver mutations: a retrospective analysis

BackgroundTargeted therapy is now the standard of care in driver–oncogene-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Its initial clinical effects are remarkable. However, almost all patients experience treatment resistance to targeted therapy. Hence, chemotherapy is considered a subsequent treatment option. In patients with driver–oncogene-negative NSCLC, combined immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and chemotherapy as the first-line therapy has been found to be beneficial. However, the efficacy of ICI plus chemotherapy against driver–oncogene-positive NSCLC other than epidermal growth factor receptor mutation and anaplastic lymphoma kinase fusion is unclear.MethodsUsing the hospital medical records, we retrospectively reviewed advanced or recurrent NSCLC patients who were treated with chemotherapy with or without ICIs at Aichi Cancer Center Hospital between January 2014 and January 2023. Patients with druggable rare mutations such as KRAS-G12C, MET exon 14 skipping, HER2 20 insertion, BRAF-V600E mutations, and ROS1 and RET rearrangements were analyzed.ResultsIn total, 61 patients were included in this analysis. ICI plus chemotherapy was administered in 36 patients (the ICI-chemo group) and chemotherapy in 25 patients (the chemo group). The median progression-free survival (PFS) rates were 14.0 months in the ICI-chemo group and 4.8 months in the chemo group (hazard ratio [HR] = 0.54, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.28–1.01). The median overall survival rates were 31.3 and 21.7 months in the ICI-chemo and chemo groups, respectively (HR = 0.70, 95% CI = 0.33–1.50). Multivariate Cox regression analysis of PFS revealed that HER2 exon 20 insertion mutation was significantly associated with a poorer PFS (HR: 2.39, 95% CI: 1.19–4.77, P = 0.014). Further, ICI-chemo treatment was significantly associated with a better PFS (HR: 0.48, 95% CI: 0.25–0.91, P = 0.025).ConclusionICI plus chemotherapy improves treatment efficacy in rare driver–oncogene-positive NSCLC.

Spatial Heterogeneity of Immune Regulators Drives Dynamic Changes in Local Immune Responses, Affecting Disease Outcomes in Pancreatic Cancer.

Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is considered a low-immunogenic (LI) tumor with a "cold" tumor microenvironment and is mostly unresponsive to immune checkpoint blockade therapies. In this study, we decipher the impact of intratumoral heterogeneity of immune determinants on antitumor responses. We performed spatial proteomic and transcriptomic analyses and multiplex immunofluorescence on multiple tumor regions, including tumor center (TC) and invasive front (IF), from 220 patients with PDAC, classified according to their transcriptomic immune signaling into high-immunogenic PDAC (HI-PDAC, n = 54) and LI PDAC (LI-PDAC, n = 166). Spatial compartments (tumor: pancytokeratin+/CD45- and leukocytes: pancytokeratin-/CD45+) were defined by fluorescence imaging. HI-PDAC exhibited higher densities of cytotoxic T lymphocytes with upregulation of T-cell priming-associated immune determinants, including CD40, ITGAM, glucocorticoid-induced TNF-related receptor, CXCL10, granzyme B, IFNG, and HLA-DR, which were significantly more prominent at the IF than at the TC. In contrast, LI-PDAC exhibited immune-evasive tumor microenvironments with downregulation of immune determinants and a negative gradient from TC to IF. Patients with HI-PDAC had significantly better outcomes but showed more frequently exhausted immune phenotypes. Our results indicate strategic differences in the regulation of immune determinants, leading to different levels of effectiveness of antitumor responses between HI and LI tumors and dynamic spatial changes, which affect the evolution of immune evasion and patient outcomes. This finding supports the coevolution of tumor and immune cells and may help define therapeutic vulnerabilities to improve antitumor immunity and harness the responsiveness to immune checkpoint inhibitors in patients with PDAC.

Real-world experience of immune checkpoint inhibitors in patients with solid tumours in the Top End of the Northern Territory, Australia from 2016 to 2021: a retrospective observational cohort study.

Use of immune checkpoint inhibitors is growing, but clinical trial data may not apply to Indigenous patients or patients living in remote areas. To provide real-world incidence of immune-related adverse events (irAE) in the Top End of the Northern Territory and compare incidence between demographic subgroups. This retrospective, observational, cohort study collected data from electronic records of patients living in the Top End with solid organ cancer treated with immunotherapy between January 2016 and December 2021. The primary outcome was cumulative incidence of any-grade and severe irAE. Secondary outcomes were overall survival, treatment duration and reason for treatment discontinuation. Two hundred and twenty-six patients received immunotherapy. Forty-eight (21%) lived in a remote or very remote area, and 36 (16%) were Indigenous. Cumulative incidence of any-grade irAE was 54% (122/226 patients); incidence of severe irAE was 26% (59/226 patients). Rates were similar between Indigenous and non-Indigenous patients of any-grade (42% vs 56%, P = 0.11) and severe (11% vs 18%, P = 0.29) irAE. However, Indigenous patients had shorter treatment duration, more frequently discontinued treatment due to patient preference and appeared to have shorter median overall survival than non-Indigenous patients (17.1 vs 30.4 months; hazard ratio (HR) = 1.5, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.92-2.66). There was no difference in mortality between remote and urban patients (median overall survival 27.5 vs 30.2 months; HR = 1.1, 95% CI = 0.7-1.7). Rates of irAE in our cohort are comparable to those in the published literature. There was no significant difference in any-grade or severe irAE incidence observed between Indigenous and non-Indigenous patients.