Characteristics Of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Research Articles

Impacts of illicit drug use on coronary angiographic findings in a multicenter registry of patients with acute coronary syndrome

Abstract Background Although illicit drug use may induce acute coronary syndrome (ACS), its impacts on coronary angiographic characteristics and the coronary artery disease (CAD) burden are a matter of debate. Purpose To assess the association between illicit drugs use and coronary angiographic findings in a multicenter patients with ACS. Methods From April 7 to 22, 2021, the Addiction in Intensive Cardiac Care Unit (ADDICT-ICCU) study included prospectively 1,499 patients admitted to ICCUs with a systematic urine multidrug test in 39 ICCUs across France. This prespecified study focuses on patients admitted for ACS with an angiography analysed by an independent Angiographic Core Laboratory. Patients with history of coronary artery bypass graft surgery were excluded. We compared coronary angiographic findings between illicit drugs users and others for the following parameters: the prevalence, location, type, and severity of CAD obstruction (stenosis≥50%), SYNTAX score, residual SYNTAX score, and the characteristics of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Results Among the 283 patients with ACS (62±13 years, 77% men), 38 (13.4%) had a positive test for illicit drugs (cannabis: 12%, cocaine: 1.1%, MDMA: 0.7%). Drug users were younger than other patients (51±12 vs 64±12 years, p<0.001), but there were no significant difference in sex ratio (89.5% vs 75.5%, p=0.088). There was no significant difference in the rate of STEMI (52.6% vs 45.7%, p=0.535) and NTSEMI (47.4% vs 54.3%, p=0.535) between drug users and others. Regarding the CAD burden, drug users had significantly less obstructive coronary lesions (1.6±1.1 vs 2.2±1.4, p=0.012), less multivessel obstructive CAD (31% vs 61%, p=0.001), and a trend for a lower initial SYNTAX score (8.3±7.8 vs 10.8±8.4; p=0.084) compared to others. Concerning culprit lesion, drug users had less bifurcation lesions (p=0.008), a trend for more left anterior descending (LAD) artery lesions (p=0.091), a higher thrombus burden score (p=0.057), and less lesions above 20 mm (p=0.183). Conclusion In patients with ACS, recent illicit drug use is associated with less number of significant lesions and less multivessel CAD. Concerning culprit lesions, illicit drugs use is associated with less bifurcation lesions, with a trend for more LAD lesions and a higher thrombus burden score.ACS analysed with Core LaboratoryAngiographic findings according to drug

No difference on angiographic features between women and men in patients with acute coronary syndrome: insights from the ADDICT-ICCU study

Abstract Background Previous studies have observed poorer outcomes in women with acute coronary syndrome (ACS). Angiographic features and angioplasty techniques to explain this difference between women and men have rarely been analyzed in recent studies. Purpose To analyze by a core laboratory angiographic finding, coronary artery disease (CAD) complexity and percutaneous intervention outcomes in women and men in patients with ACS. Methods From April 7 to 22, 2021, the Addiction in Intensive Cardiac Care Unit (ADDICT-ICCU) study included prospectively 1575 patients admitted to ICCUs with a systematic urine multidrug test in 39 ICCUs across France. This prespecified study focuses on patients admitted for ACS (n=379) with an independent angiographic core laboratory evaluation. The prevalence, location, and severity of CAD (lesion≥50%), the Syntax score, the residual Syntax score and the characteristics of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) were compared between women and men. The primary endpoint was Major Adverse Cardiac Events (MACE) defined by death, resuscitated cardiac arrest, or cardiogenic shock. Results Among the 379 patients with ACS (mean age: 63±13 years), 23% were women (n= 86) and 77% were men (n=286). Cardiovascular risk factors and CAD history were well balanced between women and men except for active smoking with less smokers in women (59% vs 81%, p<0.001). Regarding location of CAD (stenosis ≥50%), there was no significant difference between women and men: left anterior descending artery (56% vs 57%; p=0.90), circumflex (28% vs 39%; p=0.12) and right coronary artery (50% vs 48%; p=0.81). No difference was found for baseline Syntax score (7.98 vs 9.64; p=0.13). Women and men have a similar rate of multivessels disease (44% vs 50%; p=0.46) and 3 vessels disease (16% vs 20%; p=0.57). Concerning PCI, Syntax score of the culprit lesion was significantly lower in women (4.5 vs 5.5, p=0.02). Women and men received a similar number of stents (2.3 vs 2.4; p=0.33). Stent length (28.9 vs. 30.3, p=0.43) or stent diameter (3.1 vs 3.2; p= 0.11) were not significantly different. Final TIMI 3 flow was found in 92.9% of women and 88.1% of men (p=0.23). The rate of procedural complications was low in both groups. At the end of the procedure, the residual Syntax score was similar in women and men (4.4 vs 5.4; p= 0.34). The rate of in-hospital MACE was not different between women and men (4.7% vs 4.4%; p=0.91). Conclusion In this study with an independent angiographic core laboratory analysis of ACS patients, no difference between women and men regarding CAD severity or PCI outcomes was observed. Other reasons should be considered if a difference in prognosis exists between women and men.Angiographic features in Women and menAngiographic analysis by Core Laboratory

Prevalence and outcomes of coronary artery perforation during percutaneous coronary intervention.

We aimed to examine the prevalence, clinical outcomes and procedural characteristics of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) complicated by coronary artery perforation (CAP) in a contemporary patient population. Procedural records of 39,115 patients undergoing PCI between 2005 and 2016 were reviewed. CAP affected 149 cases (0.37%). The prevalence of CAP increased from 0.31% in 2005 to 0.45% in 2016 (p=0.03), reflecting an increase in more complex PCI (from 14% in 2005 to 21% in 2016; p<0.0001). CAP was associated with increased all-cause mortality (23.1% vs. 9.4% in those without perforation; p=0.0054) and was an independent predictor of mortality (HR 2.55; 95% CI: 1.34-4.78). In-patient mortality was 4% (6/149). In 43 of 149 (28.9%) cases, a significant pericardial effusion ensued and mortality rates were higher in this subgroup. Thirty-one patients had covered stents (CS) inserted and five did not survive to discharge. Of the 26 patients with a CS who survived to hospital discharge, six (23.1%) had definite stent thrombosis, and two (7.7%) had possible/probable stent thrombosis. CAP remains uncommon but the prevalence is increasing. CAP is associated with significant short- and long-term mortality, particularly when there is haemodynamic compromise necessitating pericardiocentesis. Covered stents are a valuable tool but they are associated with a high risk of stent thrombosis.

The peak of blood lactate during the first 24 h predicts mortality in acute coronary syndrome patients under extracorporeal membrane oxygenation

BackgroundParameters allowing for outcome discrimination of extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) therapy in acute coronary syndromes (ACS) complicated by refractory cardiogenic shock (CS) and/or cardio-respiratory arrest (CA) remain elusive. We aimed at evaluating the potential prognostic roles of blood and procedural parameters associated with 30-day mortality following ECMO. Methods and resultsA group of 29 patients with ACS complicated by CS and/or CA, who underwent ECMO at a single center, was retrospectively analyzed. Eighteen patients (62%) died at 30-day follow up. “Survivors” and “non-survivors” had similar demographics, clinical and biochemical characteristics at admission, except for blood lactate peak in the first 24h that was increased in non-survivors. Procedural characteristics of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and ECMO were comparable in either group. The peak of blood lactate concentration predicted 30-day mortality independently of age, sex and ECMO duration. The cutoff value, determined by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis, was found at 11mmol/l. ConclusionsThe peak of serum lactate under ECMO in the first 24h predicted 30-day mortality in patients with ACS complicated with CS and CA.

CRT-200.19 Prevalence and Characteristics of Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Fractional Flow Reserve-Determined Functionally Non-significant Coronary Lesions

Although fractional flow reserve (FFR) value >0.8 can reliably identify lesions that are at a low risk of future coronary events, discrepancies between FFR values and results of other stress testing or severity of patients’ symptoms are occasionally encountered in daily practice. Percutaneous

Comparison of Procedural Complications With Versus Without Interventional Cardiology Fellows-in-Training During Contemporary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Despite increasing complexity of contemporary procedures at tertiary care hospitals, the relationship between interventional cardiology fellows-in-training (ICFITs) and complications of percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) has not been reported. We compiled logbooks of 6 ICFITs at an academic hospital and evaluated patient and procedural characteristics of PCIs performed with and without presence of an ICFIT. The primary end point was the composite of all in-hospital PCI complications defined by the American College of Cardiology's National Cardiovascular Data Registry: (1) catheterization laboratory events such as no-reflow and dissection/perforation, (2) general clinical events such as stroke or cardiogenic shock, (3) vascular and bleeding complications, and (4) miscellaneous complications such as peak troponin or creatinine levels. Logistic regression adjusted for differences in measured confounders between patients treated with and without presence of an ICFIT. All analyses were repeated after excluding PCI for ST-elevation myocardial infarction. Of 2,605 PCI procedures at the academic hospital between July 2007 and April 2010, an ICFIT was present for 1,638 procedures (63%). Despite having worse clinical and procedural characteristics, patients in the ICFIT group experienced similar rates of the composite end point (12.9% vs 14.5% without ICFIT, p = 0.27). Longer mean fluoroscopy times and greater number of stents were noted in the ICFIT group; however, hospital length of stay was shorter and no individual adverse events were increased in the ICFIT procedures. Presence of an ICFIT remained unrelated to the composite end point after multivariable adjustment (odds ratio 0.92, 95% confidence interval 0.71 to 1.20; p = 0.53), and findings were similar after excluding PCI for ST-elevation myocardial infarction. In conclusion, in contemporary practice at a large academic medical center, PCI complication rates were not adversely affected by the presence of an ICFIT.

Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Characteristics in a Centre which Prioritizes the use of the Radial Approach

The radial approach has demonstrated superior benefits to the femoral approach in reducing vascular complications and bleeding events associated to percutaneous coronary interventions. However, because this is a more complex procedure, it requires a learning curve to get all of the advantages of the technique. The aim of this study was to present the characteristics of the procedures of a center that prioritizes the use of radial approach. Prospective registry of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) using the radial or ulnar access where angiographic success, technical failure, ischemic adverse events and severe bleeding rates were assessed. A pre-specified analysis of the group undergoing PCI for the right coronary artery was performed, comparing patients using Judkins right catheter (JR) or Amplatz catheters. Between April 2010 and May 2012, 1,117 patients underwent PCI, 1,040 (93.1%) by the radial approach and 50 (4.5%) by the ulnar approach. Sedation was performed in 58.5% of the patients, the crossover rate was 1.2%, and angiographic success was 96.2%. Extra backup catheters were used in 99.1% of PCIs for the left coronary artery, JR in 69.4% and Amplatz in 27.1% of the PCIs for the right coronary artery. When the JR and Amplatz were compared, longer procedure duration, longer fluoroscopy time, larger number of catheters, more frequent lesion predilation and higher number of implanted stents were observed in the group using Amplatz catheters as well as lower angiographic success rates. The use of radial access in PCI showed a high success rate and a low rate of major cardiac events and bleeding complications. The liberal use of sedation and 6 F introducer sheaths, associated to catheters with stronger backup force, are characteristics of our center, which prioritizes the use of the radial approach. Características Operacionais das Intervenções Coronárias Percutâneas em Centro que Prioriza a Utilização do Acesso Radial O acesso radial tem demonstrado resultados superiores aos do acesso femoral na redução de complicações vasculares e ocorrência de sangramentos associados aos procedimentos coronários percutâneos. Entretanto, por ser procedimento mais elaborado, requer dos operadores curva de aprendizagem para se obter todas as vantagens da técnica. O objetivo deste estudo foi apresentar as características dos procedimentos de um serviço que prioriza a utilização da via radial. Registro prospectivo de pacientes submetidos a intervenção coronária percutânea (ICP) pelo acesso radial ou ulnar, em que foram avaliados sucesso angiográfico do procedimento, falência da técnica, taxa de eventos adversos isquêmicos e sangramento grave. Análise pré-especificada do subgrupo que realizou ICP para coronária direita foi realizada, comparando pacientes que utilizaram cateteres Judkins de direita (JR) ou Amplatz. Entre abril de 2010 e maio de 2012, 1.117 pacientes realizaram ICP, 1.040 (93,1%) pela via radial e 50 (4,5%), pela ulnar. Sedação foi realizada em 58,5% dos pacientes, a taxa de crossover foi de 1,2% e o sucesso angiográfico, de 96,2%. Cateteres extra backup foram utilizados em 99,1% das ICPs para coronária esquerda, JR em 69,4%, e Amplatz em 27,1% das ICPs para coronária direita. Na comparação entre JR e Amplatz, observou-se maior duração do procedimento, tempo de fluoroscopia, número de cateteres, pré-dilatação da lesão e número de stents implantados no grupo que utilizou cateteres Amplatz, bem como menor sucesso angiográfico. A utilização do acesso radial na ICP mostrou alto índice de sucesso e baixo índice de eventos cardíacos maiores e de complicações hemorrágicas. O emprego liberal da sedação e de introdutores 6 F associado à escolha de cateteres com maior suporte são características operacionais de nosso centro, que prioriza o uso da técnica radial.

Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Characteristics in a Centre which Prioritizes the use of the Radial Approach

The radial approach has demonstrated superior benefits to the femoral approach in reducing vascular complications and bleeding events associated to percutaneous coronary interventions. However, because this is a more complex procedure, it requires a learning curve to get all of the advantages of the technique. The aim of this study was to present the characteristics of the procedures of a center that prioritizes the use of radial approach. Prospective registry of patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) using the radial or ulnar access where angiographic success, technical failure, ischemic adverse events and severe bleeding rates were assessed. A pre-specified analysis of the group undergoing PCI for the right coronary artery was performed, comparing patients using Judkins right catheter (JR) or Amplatz catheters. Between April 2010 and May 2012, 1,117 patients underwent PCI, 1,040 (93.1%) by the radial approach and 50 (4.5%) by the ulnar approach. Sedation was performed in 58.5% of the patients, the crossover rate was 1.2%, and angiographic success was 96.2%. Extra backup catheters were used in 99.1% of PCIs for the left coronary artery, JR in 69.4% and Amplatz in 27.1% of the PCIs for the right coronary artery. When the JR and Amplatz were compared, longer procedure duration, longer fluoroscopy time, larger number of catheters, more frequent lesion predilation and higher number of implanted stents were observed in the group using Amplatz catheters as well as lower angiographic success rates. The use of radial access in PCI showed a high success rate and a low rate of major cardiac events and bleeding complications. The liberal use of sedation and 6 F introducer sheaths, associated to catheters with stronger backup force, are characteristics of our center, which prioritizes the use of the radial approach. Características Operacionais das Intervenções Coronárias Percutâneas em Centro que Prioriza a Utilização do Acesso Radial O acesso radial tem demonstrado resultados superiores aos do acesso femoral na redução de complicações vasculares e ocorrência de sangramentos associados aos procedimentos coronários percutâneos. Entretanto, por ser procedimento mais elaborado, requer dos operadores curva de aprendizagem para se obter todas as vantagens da técnica. O objetivo deste estudo foi apresentar as características dos procedimentos de um serviço que prioriza a utilização da via radial. Registro prospectivo de pacientes submetidos a intervenção coronária percutânea (ICP) pelo acesso radial ou ulnar, em que foram avaliados sucesso angiográfico do procedimento, falência da técnica, taxa de eventos adversos isquêmicos e sangramento grave. Análise pré-especificada do subgrupo que realizou ICP para coronária direita foi realizada, comparando pacientes que utilizaram cateteres Judkins de direita (JR) ou Amplatz. Entre abril de 2010 e maio de 2012, 1.117 pacientes realizaram ICP, 1.040 (93,1%) pela via radial e 50 (4,5%), pela ulnar. Sedação foi realizada em 58,5% dos pacientes, a taxa de crossover foi de 1,2% e o sucesso angiográfico, de 96,2%. Cateteres extra backup foram utilizados em 99,1% das ICPs para coronária esquerda, JR em 69,4%, e Amplatz em 27,1% das ICPs para coronária direita. Na comparação entre JR e Amplatz, observou-se maior duração do procedimento, tempo de fluoroscopia, número de cateteres, pré-dilatação da lesão e número de stents implantados no grupo que utilizou cateteres Amplatz, bem como menor sucesso angiográfico. A utilização do acesso radial na ICP mostrou alto índice de sucesso e baixo índice de eventos cardíacos maiores e de complicações hemorrágicas. O emprego liberal da sedação e de introdutores 6 F associado à escolha de cateteres com maior suporte são características operacionais de nosso centro, que prioriza o uso da técnica radial.