To evaluate the in vitro activity of ceftazidime/avibactam, meropenem/vaborbactam, imipenem/relebactam and comparators against KPC-producing Klebsiella pneumoniae (KPC-Kp) clinical isolates collected from a multicentre study in Italy (2022-23) and genomic characterization of the molecular mechanisms causing resistance. Consecutive KPC-Kp isolates from blood cultures (n = 264) were collected from 14 hospital centres in the period 2022-23. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing was performed using broth microdilution. WGS was used to investigate KPC-Kp strains resistant to the new approved β-lactam/β-lactam inhibitor combinations (BLICs). Overall, meropenem/vaborbactam (95.1% susceptible by EUCAST and 93.9% susceptible by CLSI; MIC50 = 0.5 mg/L; MIC90 = 4 mg/L) and imipenem/relebactam (97% susceptible by EUCAST and 92.8% susceptible by CLSI; MIC50 = 0.25 mg/L; MIC90 = 0.5 mg/L) showed similar activity, followed by ceftazidime/avibactam (93.9% susceptible by both EUCAST and CLSI; MIC50 = 2 mg/L; MIC90 = 8 mg/L). Ten out of 13 (76.9%) KPC-Kp resistant to ceftazidime/avibactam carried a blaKPC variant including blaKPC-31, blaKPC-205, blaKPC-203 and blaKPC-93. Among KPC-Kp resistant to meropenem/vaborbactam and imipenem/relebactam, 90.9% (10/11) and 80% (4/5) harboured a WT carbapenemase (i.e. blaKPC-2 or blaKPC-3), respectively. All strains resistant to meropenem/vaborbactam and/or imipenem/relebactam carried truncated OmpK35 and/or mutated (ins135GD) OmpK36. New BLICs were shown to be the most widely active therapeutic option against KPC-Kp clinical isolates collected in Italy. Ceftazidime/avibactam resistance is mainly driven by the expression of KPC variants, whereas the loss of function of the OmpK35 and OmpK36 porins appears to play a key but not exclusive role in the development of meropenem/vaborbactam and/or imipenem/relebactam resistance.
Read full abstract