Change In Spine Bone Mineral Density Research Articles

Renal Function Is Associated with Changes in Bone Mineral Density in Postmenopausal Osteoporotic Women Treated with Denosumab: Data From a Retrospective Cohort Study.

Background/Objectives: Renal function influences bone metabolism, as kidney failure can increase the risk of fractures. Denosumab is an approved osteoporosis treatment, but its efficacy in relation to renal function has not yet been studied in real-life scenarios. This study aimed to investigate the denosumab-induced change in bone mineral density (BMD) according to kidney function. Methods: A retrospective analysis was conducted at the outpatient clinic in postmenopausal women receiving denosumab (60 mg subcutaneously administered every 6 months). The glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) was measured by the 2021 CKD-EPI equation and patients were stratified for eGFR categories. BMD was measured by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. Results: 128 women (mean age 70.3 ± 9.4 years) were recruited. The mean denosumab treatment duration was 3.9 ± 1.4 years and all the participants had improved BMD values. In stepwise multiple regression analysis-after controlling for age, BMI, and treatment duration-the eGFR value (ß = -0.11, SE 0.04, p = 0.01) was independently associated with the lumbar spine BMD change. The same association remained when the eGFR categories were considered (ß = 3.564, SE 1.29, p = 0.007). In addition, after controlling for BMI and the duration of denosumab treatment, age (ß = -0.7915, SE 0.37, p = 0.03) and eGFR (ß = -0.3257, SE 0.1567, p = 0.04) were found to be associated with femoral neck BMD change. The association remained when considering eGFR categories (ß = 8.7339, SE 4.29, p = 0.04). Conclusions: This retrospective study suggests that eGFR is associated with denosumab efficacy in postmenopausal women treated for osteoporosis.

Bone Mineral Density Monitoring in Contiguous versus Non-Contiguous Lumbar Vertebrae: The Manitoba BMD Registry

Introduction: Only change in bone mineral density (BMD) on repeat DXA that exceeds the 95% least significant change (LSC) should be considered clinically meaningful. Frequently lumbar spine DXA must be reported after omitting vertebrae with localized structural artifact, which reduces measurement precision. Previous reports have raised concerns of higher least significant change (LSC) when spine BMD is based on non-contiguous rather than contiguous vertebrae. The current study was performed to compare lumbar spine LSC and BMD response to intervening anti-osteoporosis medication use from non-contiguous versus contiguous vertebrae.Methodology: LSCs for lumbar spine DXA based on L1-L4 and all combinations of non-contiguous and contiguous vertebrae were calculated using 879 scan-pairs from the Manitoba BMD Program. We compared BMD change from these regions, overall and in relation to intervening anti-osteoporosis medication use, in 11,722 patients who had 2 DXA examinations.Results: LSCs were slightly greater when calculated from combinations of fewer than 4 vertebrae, but there was no meaningful difference between contiguous versus non-contiguous vertebrae. There were consistently high correlations between lumbar spine BMD change from L1-L4 and all combinations of continuous and non-contiguous vertebrae (all Pearson r≥ 0.9, p<0.001). Percentage changes in spine BMD and the fraction with treatment-concordant change exceeding the LSC were similar using contiguous or non-contiguous vertebrae.Conclusions: Lumbar spine BMD change can be assessed from 2 or 3 non-contiguous vertebrae when clinically necessary, and precision in such cases is similar to using contiguous vertebrae. Non-contiguous vertebrae can detect treatment-concordant changes similar in spine BMD to contiguous vertebrae.

Effect of bisphosphonate and denosumab treatment on TBS in Japanese breast cancer patients with AIBL.

Bisphosphonates and denosumab increase bone mineral density (BMD) for osteoporosis treatment in patients with aromatase inhibitor-associated bone loss (AIBL). This study aimed to directly compare bisphosphonates with denosumab in treating patients with AIBL and to determine the effect of denosumab on the trabecular bone score (TBS). Thirty-nine patients with AIBL receiving osteoporosis treatment (21 in the bisphosphonates group and 18 in the denosumab group) were retrospectively evaluated for changes in lumbar spine and femoral BMD, lumbar spine bone quality (assessed by TBS), and blood bone metabolic markers. The Mann-Whitney and Wilcoxon tests were used for statistical evaluation. After 24months of treatment, the lumbar spine BMD change rate was 5.82 ± 1.10% with bisphosphonates and 10.49 ± 1.20% with denosumab, with the change rate of denosumab significantly increasing over that of bisphosphonates. The change rate in femoral BMD was 2.69 ± 1.16% with bisphosphonates and 2.95 ± 1.26% with denosumab, with no significant difference between the two groups. The rate of decrease in tartrate-resistant acid phosphatase isoform 5b was significantly higher in the denosumab group. The change rate in TBS at 24months of treatment was 0.53 ± 1.26% in the bisphosphonates group and 1.08 ± 1.33% in the denosumab group, with no significant difference between the two groups. After 24months, TBS remained stable. Both bisphosphonates and denosumab may increase BMD, improve bone metabolism, and inhibit bone quality loss in patients with AIBL.

One versus 2years of alendronate following denosumab: the CARD extension.

When denosumab is discontinued, antiresorptive therapy is critical to attenuate high-turnover bone loss. The ideal choice and duration of antiresorptive therapy are not yet defined, however. In the Comparison of Alendronate or Raloxifene following Denosumab (CARD) study, we demonstrated that 12months of alendronate was better able to maintain the bone mineral density (BMD) gains achieved with 12months of denosumab versus 12months of raloxifene. In this extension, we wished to determine if 12months of alendronate would be sufficient in maintaining these denosumab-induced BMD gains. In the CARD study, postmenopausal osteoporotic women aged 60-79 at high fracture risk received 12months of denosumab 60-mg SC every 6months followed by 12months of either alendronate 70mg weekly (N = 26) or raloxifene (N = 25). All subjects in the alendronate arm were then offered participation in a 1-year extension in which they were randomized to continue alendronate for an additional 12months (N = 10) or to receive calcium and vitamin D alone (N = 8). The primary outcome was change in spine BMD between months 24 and 36. Exploratory endpoints included changes in areal BMD (aBMD) at other anatomic sites as well as changes in serum bone turnover markers. The CARD study demonstrated the effectiveness of 12months alendronate in preserving denosumab-induced BMD gains. In the extension, aBMD was maintained at the spine, total hip, and femoral neck in both those randomized to an additional year of alendronate and those randomized to calcium/vitamin D alone. We did, however, observe a transient comparative decrease between months 24-30 in the calcium/vitamin D group at the total hip (P = 0.008) and femoral neck (P = 0.040). At the end of 24months of the CARD study, bone turnover markers serum c-telopeptide (CTX) and procollagen N-propeptide of type I collagen (PINP) were suppressed in both groups and then increased more between months 24-36 in the calcium/vitamin D group than the alendronate group (P = 0.051 for CTX, P = 0.030 for P1NP). Both CTX and PINP remained below the month 0 baseline in both groups (P < 0.05 for all comparisons). With the limitations of our small sample size, these data suggest that both 1 and 2years of alendronate effectively maintain BMD gains achieved with 1year of denosumab and prevented any rebound in bone turnover marker levels above pre-denosumab baseline. This is the first randomized trial to assess minimum duration of bisphosphonate after short-term denosumab and may be helpful to guide clinical care. Similar studies performed after longer durations of denosumab would be helpful to further define optimal management. ClinicalTrials.gov registration number: NCT03623633.

Real-world effects, safety, and predictors of the effectiveness of romosozumab in primary and secondary osteoporosis: An observational study

Romosozumab is an anti-sclerostin antibody that increases bone formation and decreases bone resorption. It became available for patients at high risk of osteoporotic fractures in Japan in 2019. The aim of this study was to clarify the clinical effects, safety, and predictors of the effectiveness of 12 months of romosozumab therapy. The study had an observational pre-post design and included 460 patients. Romosozumab was administered at a dose of 210 mg subcutaneously every 4 weeks for 12 months. The incidence of new fractures, safety, and changes in bone mineral density (BMD) and bone turnover markers were recorded. New fractures occurred in 11 cases (3.0 %). Nine patients (2.0 %) experienced cardiovascular events, which were fatal in 3 (0.65 %). Percent changes in BMD at the spine and total hip at 12 months from baseline were +7.7 % and +1.8 %, respectively. Romosozumab had better effects in patients with good renal function, low spine BMD, and high TRACP-5b at baseline and low TRACP-5b or high P1NP after 1 month of treatment. The percent change in spine BMD at 12 months was significantly lower in patients transitioning from denosumab than in those not previously treated with other anti-osteoporosis agents. Romosozumab is considered to be relatively safe in patients with primary osteoporosis compared to those with secondary osteoporosis. Romosozumab resulted in larger increases in spine BMD in patients with primary osteoporosis who were not previously treated with other anti-osteoporosis therapies and those with low spine BMD at the start of treatment.

Assessing Change in Spine Bone Density from Different Numbers and Combinations of Lumbar Vertebrae: The Manitoba BMD Registry

Introduction: Change in bone mineral density (BMD) is considered significant when it exceeds the 95 % least significant change (LSC) derived from that facility's precision study. The lumbar spine is often affected by structural artifact such that not all four lumbar vertebrae are evaluable. Guidelines suggest using a site-matched LSC when omitting vertebrae from the BMD measurement. The current study describes significant BMD change related to intervening anti-osteoporosis treatment for different numbers and combinations of lumbar vertebrae using site-matched LSC values.Methodology: We identified 10,526 untreated adult women mean age 59.6 years with baseline and repeat spine BMD testing (mean interval 4.7 years) where all 4 lumbar vertebrae were evaluable. Change in spine BMD for different combinations of lumbar vertebrae was assessed in relation to intervening anti-resorptive treatment, contrasting women with high treatment exposure (medication possession ratio, MPR ≥ 0.8) versus women who remained untreated. Site-matched LSC values were derived from 879 test-retest precision measurements.Results: There was consistent linear trend between increasing MPR and BMD change exceeding the LSC for all lumbar vertebral combinations, positive with BMD increase and negative with BMD decrease (all p-trend <0.001). In the high treatment exposure group, mean percent increases in spine BMD were similar for all vertebral combinations, from L1-4 to a single vertebra. In untreated women, mean percent decreases in spine BMD were also similar for all vertebral combinations. The net treatment response (proportion of women with treatment-concordant changes minus proportion with treatment-discordant changes exceeding the LSC) was 29.7 % for 4 vertebrae, 27.5-30.0 % for 3 vertebrae, 22.4-28.5 % for 2 vertebrae, and 18.1-21.9 % for a single vertebra.Conclusions: All numbers and combinations of lumbar vertebrae, when used in conjunction with site-matched LSC values, can provide clinically meaningful follow-up in treated and untreated patients, even when spine BMD is based on a single vertebral body.

Bone mineral density fall during aromatase inhibitor treatment may predict lower breast cancer recurrence.

Aromatase inhibitors (AIs) are associated with reduction in bone mineral density (BMD). The use of bone strengthening agents zoledronic acid and denosumab are associated with improved breast cancer outcomes for post-menopausal patients treated with AIs. This study investigates whether change in BMD with AI therapy is associated with breast cancer recurrence. A cohort of patients treated at a single institution diagnosed with hormone receptor-positive breast cancer with baseline BMD and subsequent BMD test while receiving adjuvant aromatase inhibitor therapy were studied. Demographic, treatment and outcome data was obtained. Simple and multiple linear regression analysis was performed to investigate predictors of annual percent BMD change at the LS and hip. Univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazards modelling were undertaken to investigate predictors of breast cancer recurrence. 353 patients eligible patients were identified. In multivariate analysis of lumbar spine BMD change, the difference between those in quartile 1, which showed the greatest reduction in BMD, and quartile 3, with substantially less reduction, was significant (HR = 3.02, 95% CI 1.15-7.90 p = 0.025). Hip BMD reduction was also not significantly associated with breast cancer recurrence. The two quartiles with the least reduction in hip BMD showing a non-significant reduced risk of recurrence relative to the quartile with the greatest (p = 0.10). The findings suggest an association may exist between lumbar spine BMD change and breast cancer recurrence for patients treated with adjuvant AI. Further research is required to determine whether BMD change can be utilised as a biomarker.

Delayed versus immediate use of zoledronic acid for postmenopausal patients with ER/PR positive early breast cancer who are using adjuvant letrozole.

8 Background: Aromatase inhibitors are the standard adjuvant therapy for postmenopausal women with hormone receptor (HR) positive early breast cancer (EBC). In such patients, a significant reduction in bone density was observed. To stop bone loss, bisphosphonates have a powerful effect on reducing bone resorption and improving the survival of patients with EBC. This study compared potential bone-protection of immediate versus delayed administration of zoledronic acid (ZOL) in patients with EBC receiving adjuvant letrozole. Methods: In a prospective two-arm comparative study, 65 postmenopausal patients with HR+ EBC in whom adjuvant letrozole treatment was initiated (2.5 mg/day for 5 years), we included either (45) immediate ZOL treatment or (20) delayed ZOL treatment (both at 4 mg every 6 months). Patients in the delayed ZOL group received ZOL only for fracture or increased bone pain or developed bone mineral density (BMD)T score = or &lt; -2.0. We aimed to assess the change in lumber spine BMD every 3 months for 24 months for both immediate and delayed arm patients, in addition to evaluating bone pain deterioration and the disease-free survival (DFS). Results: Analysis of data showed significant differences between immediate and delayed arms in the first three BMD measurements with mean values were -1.55± 0.4 vs. -1.9± 0.2, -1.56± 0.3 vs. -2.5± 0.3, and -1.4±0.3 vs. -3.5± 0.3 with p&lt;0.002, 0.001, 0.0001 respectively. Despite ZOL administration in delayed arm patients was initiated 6 months later than immediate arm patients, improvement of BMD was detected in delayed arm later on. The median DFS for immediate and delayed arms were 39± 0.6 months and 21± 0.4 months respectively with p&lt;0.001 in both. Although, in pre-ZOL bone pain scoring, most patients of delayed arm (75%) were found to have a score of 3 compared to 51.1% of immediate arm, significant improvement in bone pain scores in both arms separately after ZOL administration was noted with p-values 0.031, and 0.025 respectively. Conclusions: Immediate ZOL administration prevented bone loss, improved bone pain, and ameliorate DFS in postmenopausal women with HR+ EBC receiving adjuvant letrozole. Clinical trial information: PACTR202112813934276.

Early Changes in the Bone Mineral Density on Dual-energy X-ray Absorptiometry Scan of Patients Undergoing Primary Cemented Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Prospective Cohort Study

Background: The known risk factors of osteoarthritis (OA) knee are aging and obesity while the risk factors of osteoporosis are aging and low body weight, so the relationship between all three is complex. Currently, the dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) test is the gold standard in osteoporosis diagnostics. Many epidemiologic studies have revealed increased bone mineral density (BMD) in individuals with OA knee. The impact of total knee arthroplasty (TKA) on BMD levels is not fully understood. Concern has been raised regarding the increased risk of femoral and spine fractures early after TKA. Hence, we conducted this study to measure the BMD changes in the hip and spine in patients receiving TKA. Materials and Methods: It was a prospective interventional cohort study conducted from December 2018 to December 2020. The study included 43 patients admitted for elective TKA after applying the relevant inclusion and exclusion criteria. Patients were analyzed with DXA scans both preoperatively and 6 months postoperatively. Results: When we studied all the patients as one single sample, the initial observation was that at the 6-month follow-up, the patients showed a statistically significant improvement in the femur BMD score while the change in spine BMD was statistically insignificant. However, when subsets of the study sample, i.e. preoperatively normal, osteopenic, and osteoporotic patients, underwent further analysis, we found that out of 18 patients having normal BMD preoperatively, one patient developed osteopenia and another developed osteoporosis upon postoperative follow-up DXA scan. Similarly, one out of the eight patients, having osteoporosis preoperatively, improved a grade to osteopenia upon postoperative follow-up DXA scan. However, these changes were not statistically significant. Conclusions: we conclude that there is no statistically significant change in both the femur and the spine BMD at least 6-month follow-up postprimary TKA.

Bone mineral density response to antiosteoporotic drugs in older depressed adults.

This study aimed to evaluate the effects of depression and antidepressants on bone mineral density (BMD) and response to antiosteoporotic agents in older adults. A total of 198 participants with osteoporosis, aged 65 and over, were included in this retrospective study. BMD was measured by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry scanning at baseline and month 24. Eighty-three of the 198 patients had a diagnosis of depression, and all were serotonergic antidepressant users. Baseline BMD was similar in depressed and non-depressed patients. Lumbar spine BMD change was significantly lower in depressed patients than non-depressed patients (2.89% and 4.85%, respectively, p < 0.001). In addition, of those receiving denosumab treatment, depressed ones had lower lumbar spine BMD changes. Depression and/or antidepressant use was an independent variable for non-response to osteoporosis treatment in both the femoral neck (p = 0.008, OR = 2.61) and lumbar spine (p = 0.015, OR = 6.87), while alendronate and zoledronic acid were independent variables for non-response in the femoral neck and total femur compared to denosumab. Our study has shown that the presence of depression and/or serotonergic antidepressant use was associated with non-response to osteoporosis treatment in older adults. The results of our study may guide physicians to make treatment decisions in older individuals with depression.

Bisphosphonates Alleviate Bone Loss in People with Acute Spinal Cord Injury：A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Bone loss is not to be underestimated in people with acute spinal cord injury (SCI). Bisphosphonates can inhibit the bone resorption of osteoclast. To study whether the early application of bisphosphonates can alleviate bone loss after acute SCI, we included 7 randomized controlled trials for meta-analysis. Seven randomized controlled trials were found in literature databases. The percentage change in bone mineral density (BMD) at different sites were primary outcomes and serum bone turnover markers were secondary outcomes. A random-effects model was selected for meta-analysis. There were significant differences in the percentage change in BMD of the lumbar spine, total hip, and femoral neck between the bisphosphonates and control groups, but not in the percentage change in distal femur BMD. Besides, there were no statistically significant differences between the groups in the bone formation marker Procollagen type 1N propeptide; bisphosphonates were effective in reducing the C-terminal telopeptide at the 6-month follow-up, but not at the 12-month follow-up. Subgroup analysis of the effects of zoledronate showed positive effects on BMD of the lumbar spine, total hip, and femoral neck at the 6-month follow-up and showed positive effects on BMD of the total hip and femoral neck at the 12-month follow-up. Bisphosphonates can effectively alleviate the bone loss of the lumbar spine, total hip, and femoral neck in patients with acute SCI, and early application is advocated.

Effect of 24-Week, Late-Evening Ingestion of a Calcium-Fortified, Milk-Based Protein Matrix on Biomarkers of Bone Metabolism and Site-Specific Bone Mineral Density in Postmenopausal Women with Osteopenia.

Dietary calcium intake is a modifiable, lifestyle factor that can affect bone health and the risk of fracture. The diurnal rhythm of bone remodelling suggests nocturnal dietary intervention to be most effective. This study investigated the effect of daily, bed-time ingestion of a calcium-fortified, milk-derived protein matrix (MBPM) or control (CON), for 24 weeks, on serum biomarkers of bone resorption (C-terminal telopeptide of type I collagen, CTX) and formation (serum pro-collagen type 1 N-terminal propeptide, P1NP), and site-specific aerial bone mineral density (BMD), trabecular bone score (TBS), in postmenopausal women with osteopenia. The MBPM supplement increased mean daily energy, protein, and calcium intake, by 11, 30, and 107%, respectively. 24-week supplementation with MBPM decreased CTX by 23%, from 0.547 (0.107) to 0.416 (0.087) ng/mL (p < 0.001) and P1NP by 17%, from 60.6 (9.1) to 49.7 (7.2) μg/L (p < 0.001). Compared to CON, MBPM induced a significantly greater reduction in serum CTX (mean (CI95%); −9 (8.6) vs. −23 (8.5)%, p = 0.025 but not P1NP −19 (8.8) vs. −17 (5.2)%, p = 0.802). No significant change in TBS, AP spine or dual femur aerial BMD was observed for CON or MBPM. This study demonstrates the potential benefit of bed-time ingestion of a calcium-fortified, milk-based protein matrix on homeostatic bone remodelling but no resultant treatment effect on site-specific BMD in postmenopausal women with osteopenia.

Effects of Bisphosphonates Treatments in Osteopenic Older Women: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Aims: To review the effects of bisphosphonates on bone density, fractures, and bone markers in osteopenic older women. Methods: Relevant articles published before February 2022 were searched in PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library. All randomized controlled trials that reported incident fractures, bone mineral density (BMD), bone markers, or adverse events with bisphosphonates in osteopenic older women were included. The quality of included studies was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool. The risk ratios (RRs) for fractures, net percent change in bone mineral density and differences in bone markers were calculated using a meta-analysis. Results: A total of 11 studies were included in our meta-analysis. Bisphosphonates significantly increased the percent changes in the lumbar spine BMD (WMD, 5.60; 95% CI, 4.16–7.03; I 2 = 93.6%), hip BMD (WMD, 4.80; 95% CI, 2.93 to 6.66; I 2 = 97.1%), total body BMD (WMD, 3.24; 95% CI, 2.12–4.35; I 2 = 90.9%), femoral neck BMD (WMD, 4.02; 95% CI, 1.70–6.35; I 2 = 91.8%) and trochanter BMD (WMD, 5.22; 95% CI, 3.51–6.93; I 2 = 83.6%) when compared to placebo. Zoledronate was associated with a great treatment effect on fragility fracture (RR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.50–0.79), clinical vertebral fracture (RR, 0.41; 95% CI, 0.22–0.76), and radiographic vertebral fracture (RR, 0.60; 95% CI, 0.27–1.35) compared to placebo. Meanwhile, alendronate was also associated with beneficial effects on fragility fracture (RR, 0.40; 95% CI, 0.15–1.07), clinical vertebral fracture (RR, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.17–1.24), and radiographic vertebral fracture (RR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.38–1.09). In addition, the use of bisphosphonates reduced the concentration of procollagen type I N-terminal propeptide (PINP) and C-terminal telopeptide of type I collagen (CTX) over placebo by 15.79 (95% CI, −18.92 to −12.66; I 2 = 28.4%), −0.23 (95% CI, −0.35 to −0.10; I 2 = 91.3%), respectively. Although there was insufficient evidence to determine their safety, these bisphosphonates may have an effect on cancer, cardiac events, and mortality in osteopenic older women. Conclusion: All bisphosphonates examined were associated with beneficial effects on fractures, BMD, and bone markers in women with osteopenia. Further randomized controlled trials are necessary to clarify the safety of bisphosphonates in women with osteopenia.

Simplification from tenofovir disoproxil fumarate plus lamivudine or emtricitabine plus ritonavir-boosted protease inhibitor to ritonavir-boosted atazanavir plus lamivudine in virologically suppressed HIV-infected adults with osteopenia: a pilot study.

Tenofovir disoproxil fumarate, particularly when given with a ritonavir-boosted PI, reduces bone mineral density (BMD) and increases bone turnover markers (BTMs). Ritonavir-boosted atazanavir plus lamivudine is a feasible simplified option. We evaluated whether switching from a triple ritonavir-boosted PI plus tenofovir disoproxil fumarate to a two-drug regimen of lamivudine plus ritonavir-boosted atazanavir would improve BMD. Single-arm pilot study. Virologically suppressed patients on tenofovir disoproxil fumarate plus lamivudine or emtricitabine plus ritonavir-boosted PI with low BMD, without previous resistance mutations and/or virological failure to study drugs were switched to 100/300 mg of ritonavir-boosted atazanavir plus 300 mg of lamivudine once daily. The primary endpoint was BMD change by DXA at Week 48. There were 31 patients, 4 (13%) female, and median age was 40 years. Seven participants (22.5%) had osteoporosis. At 48 weeks, mean (SD) changes in spine and hip BMD were +0.01 (0.03) (P = 0.0239) and +0.013 (0.03) g/cm2 (P = 0.0046), respectively. Mean (SD) T-score changes were +0.1 (0.23) (P = 0.0089) and +0.25 (0.76) (P = 0.0197), respectively. N-telopeptide and urine tenofovir disoproxil fumarate toxicity markers showed significant improvements. One participant withdrew from the study and two were lost to follow-up. There were no virological failures, or serious or grade 3-4 adverse events. Switching from a tenofovir disoproxil fumarate plus ritonavir-boosted PI triple therapy to a lamivudine plus ritonavir-boosted atazanavir two-drug regimen in virologically suppressed HIV-infected adults with low BMD was safe, increased low BMD and reduced plasma markers of bone turnover and urine markers of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate toxicity over 48 weeks.

Pharmacogenetics of Osteoporosis: A Pathway Analysis of the Genetic Influence on the Effects of Antiresorptive Drugs.

Osteoporosis is a skeletal disorder defined by a decreased bone mineral density (BMD) and an increased susceptibility to fractures. Bisphosphonates and selective oestrogen receptor modulators (SERM) are among the most widely used drugs. They inhibit bone resorption by targeting the mevalonate and oestrogen pathways, respectively. The aim of this study was to determine if common variants of genes in those pathways influence drug responses. We studied 192 women treated with oral aminobisphosphonates and 51 with SERMs. Genotypes at 154 SNPs of the mevalonate pathway and 806 in the oestrogen pathway were analyzed. Several SNPs located in genes FDPS and FNTA were associated with the bisphosphonate-induced changes in hip bone mineral density (BMD), whereas polymorphisms of the PDSS1, CYP19A1, CYP1A1, and CYP1A2 genes were associated with SERM-induced changes in spine BMD. After multivariate analyses, genotypes combining genes FDPS and FNTA showed a stronger association with bisphosphonate response (r = 0.34; p = 0.00009), whereas the combination of CYP19A1 and PDSS1 genotypes was associated with the response to SERMs (r = 0.62, p = 0.0003). These results suggest that genotyping genes in these pathways may help predict the response to antiresorptive drugs and hence make personalized therapeutic choices.

Raloxifene Use After Denosumab Discontinuation Partially Attenuates Bone Loss in the Lumbar Spine in Postmenopausal Osteoporosis.

Discontinuation of denosumab (DMab) is associated with decline in bone density. Whether raloxifene can be effective to attenuate bone loss after DMab discontinuation in certain conditions when other antiresorptives cannot be used remains unclear. Data on postmenopausal women with osteoporosis who discontinued DMab treatment after short-term use (1-to-4 doses) at Severance Hospital, Seoul, Korea, between 2017 and 2021 were reviewed. Changes in bone mineral density (BMD) at 12months after DMab discontinuation was compared between sequential raloxifene users (DR) and those without any sequential antiresorptive (DD) after 1:1 propensity score matching. In matched cohort (66 patients; DR n = 33 vs. DD n = 33), mean age (69.3 ± 8.2years) and T-score (lumbar spine - 2.2 ± 0.7; total hip - 1.6 ± 0.6) did not differ between two groups at the time of DMab discontinuation. Sequential treatment to raloxifene in DR group attenuated the bone loss in lumbar spine after DMab discontinuation compared to DD group (DR vs. DD; - 2.8% vs. - 5.8%, p = 0.013). The effect of raloxifene on lumbar spine BMD changes remained robust (adjusted β + 2.92 vs. DD, p = 0.009) after adjustment for covariates. BMD loss at femoral neck (- 1.70% vs. - 2.77%, p = 0.673) and total hip (- 1.42% vs. - 1.44%, p = 0.992) did not differ between two groups. Compared to BMD at DMab initiation, DR partially retained BMD gain by DMab treatment in lumbar spine (+ 3.7%, p = 0.003) and femoral neck (+ 2.8%, p = 0.010), whereas DD did not. Raloxifene use after DMab treatment attenuated lumbar spine BMD loss in postmenopausal women with short exposures (< 2years) to DMab.

Bone mass measurement by DXA should be interpreted with caution in the CKD population with vascular calcification

BackgroundKDIGO guidelines suggest the use of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) to assess bone mineral density (BMD) in patients with CKD 3a-5D. Previous studies have demonstrated an association between trabecular bone mass loss and coronary artery calcification (CAC) progression. This study aimed to prospectively investigate the relationship between BMD changes, quantified by DXA, and CAC progression in the non-dialyzed CKD population. MethodsIn this post hoc study, BMD by DXA was measured at the lumbar spine and total hip at baseline and 12-months. Patients were categorized according to BMD changes into 3 different groups: LOSS, UNCHANGED and GAIN. CAC quantification was obtained by multislice computed tomography at baseline and 12-months. Results87 patients (55.6 ± 10.7 years, 62% males, 30% diabetic, eGFR = 39.2 ± 18.1 mL/min/1.73m2) were enrolled. CAC was found in 41 (47%) of the patients at baseline and CAC progression in 25 (64%) of them. Considering the lumbar spine and total hip BMD changes together, 24%, 48%, and 25% of the patients were in the LOSS, UNCHANGED and GAIN groups, respectively. Compared to the UNCHANGED or LOSS groups, the GAIN group had an increase in calcium score (p = 0.04) and a higher proportion of patients with CAC progression (p = 0.01). In the logistic regression analysis, CAC progression was 4.5 times more likely to be in the GAIN group. ConclusionsThe association between the increase in BMD values and the progression of vascular calcification was the result of two concomitant processes overlapping, leading to a misinterpretation of DXA results. Thus, the use of DXA for the evaluation of bone mass, especially at the lumbar spine, must be applied with restraint and its results very carefully interpreted in CKD patients.

A model-based analysis to guide gonadotropin-releasing hormone receptor antagonist use for management of endometriosis.

AimsTo identify linzagolix doses, an oral GnRH receptor antagonist, that effectively lower oestradiol (E2) to relieve endometriosis‐related pelvic pain without compromising bone health.MethodsIntegrated statistical, pharmacokinetic–pharmacodynamic and systems pharmacology models were developed from Phase 1 and 2 clinical trial data in healthy volunteers and patients, receiving linzagolix 25–200 mg daily or placebo, and analysed simultaneously. The main outcome measures were pelvic pain scores for dysmenorrhoea, nonmenstrual pelvic pain (NMPP), uterine bleeding and lumbar spine bone mineral density (BMD).ResultsLinzagolix pharmacokinetics were described by a 2‐compartment model with sequential zero/first‐order absorption process (CL/F: 0.422 L/h). E2 changes over time were well described as a function of linzagolix 24‐hour AUC (AUC50: 1.68 × 105 ng h/mL). For a Caucasian reference patient, a change in E2 from 50–20 pg/mL at 24 weeks increased the odds of relief of dysmenorrhoea 1.33‐fold and NMPP 1.07‐fold (95% CI: 1.22–1.47 and 1.02–1.12, respectively) and decreased bleeding days by 1.55 (95% CI: 1.39–1.72). A previously validated quantitative systems pharmacology BMD model was adjusted to the clinical data. The mean week 24 lumbar spine BMD change from baseline ranged from −0.092% in the 50 mg dose, −1.30% in the 100 mg dose group and −2.67% in the 200 mg dose group.DiscussionThe previously‐reported E2 target range (20–50 pg/mL) to balance efficacy and safety endpoints was confirmed. Linzagolix once daily doses between 75–125 mg daily were expected to meet endometriosis‐associated pain, efficacy, and BMD loss targets in Caucasian patients.

Factors Associated with Bone Mineral Density and Bone Resorption Markers in Postmenopausal HIV-Infected Women on Antiretroviral Therapy: A Prospective Cohort Study.

The study aimed to determine factors associated with changes in bone mineral density (BMD) and bone resorption markers over two years in black postmenopausal women living with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) on antiretroviral therapy (ART). Women (n = 120) aged > 45 years were recruited from Potchefstroom, South Africa. Total lumbar spine and left femoral neck (LFN) BMD were measured with dual energy X-ray absorptiometry. Fasting serum C-Telopeptide of Type I collagen (CTx), vitamin D and parathyroid hormone were measured. Vitamin D insufficiency levels increased from 23% at baseline to 39% at follow up. In mixed linear models serum CTx showed no change from baseline to end (p = 0.363, effect size = 0.09). Total and LFN BMD increased significantly over two years, but effect sizes were small. No significant change in spine BMD over time was detected (p = 0.19, effect size = 0.02). Age was significantly positively associated with CTx over time, and negatively with total and LFN BMD. Physical activity (PA) was positively associated with LFN BMD (p = 0.008). Despite a decrease in serum vitamin D, BMD and CTx showed small or no changes over 2 years. Future studies should investigate PA interventions to maintain BMD in women living with HIV.

Circulating Lipocalin-2 Predicts Changes in Lumbar Spine Bone Mineral Density After Parathyroidectomy in Primary Hyperparathyroidism

Lipocalin-2(LCN2), known as neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin is known to a regulator of bone homeostasis. Upregulation of LCN2 in mice reduces osteoblast differentiation and stimulates the NF-kB pathway, promoting osteoclastogenesis. High serum LCN2 level was associated with elevated risk of fracture-related hospitalization in elderly women. Bone mineral density(BMD) of primary hyperparathyroidism(PHPT) patients tends to recover after parathyroidectomy, but with different extent. Whether circulating LCN2 can predict the extent of BMD recovery after parathyroidectomy in PHPT remains unclear. Clinical data and preoperative serum samples obtained from 35 PHPT patients (women n=30) who underwent parathyroidectomy at Severance hospital, Seoul, Korea between 2016 and 2019 were analyzed. Among 35 patients, 25 patients underwent BMD before surgery and two years after surgery. LCN2 was measured using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay kit (DLCN20, R&D Systems, USA). Primary outcome was two-year lumbar spine BMD change (%). Mean age of study subjects was 57±13 years. Calcium and parathyroid hormone (PTH) levels restored to normal range after parathyroidectomy in all subjects (calcium [mean 8.7±0.4mg/dL]; PTH [median 33.3], 25.9 to 47.4 pg/mL). Baseline BMD of lumbar spine(LS), femoral neck(FN), and total hip(TH) were 0.776±0.177 g/cm2, 0.578±0.138 g/cm2, and 0.695±0.150 g/cm2, respectively. At 1 year after parathyroidectomy, BMD increased up to 5.5%, 6.1%, and 4.5% at LS, FN, and TH, respectively. At 2 years after parathyroidectomy, BMD increased up to 8.6%, 7.6%, and 7.2% at LS, FN, and TH, respectively. Log-transformed LCN2 at baseline showed positive correlation with LS BMD changes (%) after 2 years (β Coefficient = 3.46, 95% CI = 0.83 to 6.10, p-value = 0.012). In multiple linear regression model, one log-unit increment in LCN2 was associated with 4.7 percent point increase in LSBMD at two years after parathyroidectomy (adjusted β=4.72, 95% CI = 1.62 to 7.82, p-value = 0.005) after adjustment of PTH, creatinine level, and body mass index. This result remained robust for 3 year change in LSBMD (in subgroup, n=14; adjusted β=4.70, 95% CI = 0.9 to 8.5, p-value = 0.021). In conclusion, preoperative high circulating LCN2 level was associated with more LSBMD gain after parathyroidectomy in patients with PHPT.