As you have noticed, the Editorial Office has made major efforts to redesign and improve the journal appearance and contents. This has included the simplification of the submission formats and the introduction of Commentaries to highlight important manuscripts. I believe that this will bring an increased visibility of interesting manuscripts to a broader scientific audience. The September issue starts with another novelty: focusing on a specific topic in a given issue. As these papers are not invited but are regular submissions, focusing on certain topics will depend on the manuscripts we have “in-house.” The September issue presents a collection of manuscripts that are loosely related to DNA analysis, cell proliferation, and death. It starts with an exciting review by the group of Darzynkiewicz (page 648) on ATM activation and histone H2AX phosphorylation to determine DNA damage by cytometric tools. The review elegantly shows the value of flow- and image-cytometry in studying factors that affect DNA repair and explore the linkage between DNA damage, cell cycle checkpoints, and initiation of apoptosis. King et al. (page 668) investigated apoptosis induction in Jurkat cells using three different flow cytometric methods: cytochrome c release, loss of mitochondrial cardiolipin, and decrease of mitochondrial membrane potential. They demonstrated that in their model system, cytochrome c release is a good marker but underestimates the fraction of apoptotic cells. Hollier et al. (page 675) evaluated two assays for apoptosis detection in clinical samples. They proposed two independent novel assays that enable determination of not only the major apoptosis pathways but also the cell types affected. Shi et al. (page 686) investigated the influence of over-expression of glutamate-cysteine ligase (GCL) on the resistance of single-strand breaks to peroxide treatment in two cell lines. Their study yielded the important finding that genetic factors affecting GCL expression have an impact on DNA single-strand breaks and thus affect susceptibility towards cancer. In the study of Slaninova et al. (page 700), quaternary benzo[c]phenanthridine binding to DNA of viable cells was demonstrated. Because of their fluorescent characteristics, the nuclear architecture, chromosomes, and apoptotic fragments could be visualized in fluorescence microscopy and flow cytometry. The authors also stated that a cell cycle analysis would be possible by using the alkaloid macarpine. Intracellular Glutathione (GSH) is attracting attention in the investigation of many diseases due to its role in cell protection. Hamilton et al. (page 709) focused on rapid assessment of GSH levels in clinical settings. Using three different drug treatments they demonstrated that the changes in GSH concentration could be detected semi-quantitatively by CM-SNARF. Quantitation of DNA content and cell cycle are prerequisites for the analysis of changes in the cell cycle. Wang and Huang (page 716) proposed a mixture-model classification for DNA content analysis. They demonstrated in a model system the sensitivity of their approach for detecting cell cycle differences in mixed populations. Lin et al. (page 724) showed a multi-model approach for quantitative studies of 3D confocal microscope images. With their method, nuclear segmentation and classification of heterogenous populations of cell nuclei—like in tissues with multiple cell types and different nuclear features—could be analyzed simultaneously. Since its early years, the journal Cytometry stood out by publishing groundbreaking technologies like DNA flow cytometry of fresh-frozen (1) or paraffin embedded tissues (2), both being standard methods today. Over the last few years new methods, in particular analysis of apoptosis (3), have been proposed. Such novel techniques are released regularly in our journal and obtain the status of standard protocols. These papers belong to the most cited ones in Cytometry. As an example, the paper by Vindelov et al. (1) has been cited over 1,500 times. Tissue Cytometry was introduced in Cytometry Part A as an alternative method to perform quantitative analysis in sectioned material (4). Supporting this concept Mosch et al. (5) proposed quantitative DNA cell cycle analysis of brain sections by Slide Based Cytometry (SBC). Recently, the group clearly demonstrated that SBC analyses of the cell cycle distribution are equal to other independent molecular biological methods (6). This highly emphasizes the great relevance of quantitative imaging and automated analysis of the cell cycle in tissues. The journal Cytometry was in the past and will be in the future an important source for biomedical research and novel technologies for determining cell cycle and death in a quantitative fashion as demonstrated by the manuscripts of this issue. I hope to see your exciting research sent to our journal in the future.
Read full abstract