e18718 Background: COVID-19-related physical distancing restrictions impacted the delivery of close-contact healthcare care in the initial months of the pandemic. To ascertain the effect of these changes on breast cancer (BC) care at Gundersen Health System (GHS), we compared stage at diagnosis (dx), interval between dx and initiation of treatment (tx), and modality of first tx offered to pts (pts) diagnosed with BC before, during, and after pandemic-related restrictions. Methods: We performed a retrospective review of the electronic health records of approximately 904 pts with a new BC dx at GHS. Based on the timing of COVID-19-related restrictions at GHS, we designated any date from January 1, 2019 - March 31, 2020 as “Pre-COVID”, April 1, 2020 - December 31, 2020 as “COVID”, and January 1, 2021 - March 31, 2022 as “Post-COVID”. The median time to first tx for each modality of tx was compared using Kruskal-Wallis tests. Cox proportional hazard models were used to investigate patterns in the time to tx for various tx modalities in the three time periods of interest while accounting for clinical stage at dx. Changes in the distribution of modality of first tx, cancer stage at dx, type of surgery, and mode of disease detection across the three time periods of interest were assessed using Chi-square tests of association. Results: The median time to surgery for pts with surgery as first tx modality was significantly different between time periods (p < 0.001) with time to surgery shortest pre-COVID and longest post-COVID. Significant differences in time to first chemotherapy tx were noted for clinical stage 2 pts (p = 0.002), but not for pts diagnosed at other stages. No differences were noted in times to first hormone therapy tx (p = 0.28). There were significant differences in the distribution of modality of first tx (p < 0.001), the clinical stage at dx (p = 0.01), and the mode of detection (p = 0.04) across the three time periods. These differences reveal a shift in the typical paradigm of BC care due to the pandemic; with a delay in detection and tx, change in clinical stage at dx, and a change in the modality of the first tx. Conclusions: Our data illustrate the effect the pandemic had on routine BC care during and after the pandemic-related restrictions regarding time to first tx, clinical stage at the time of dx, and initial tx modality. Furthermore, these pandemic changes are ongoing with the time to first tx longer in the post-pandemic period as compared to pre-pandemic period. This delay in return to pre-pandemic standards may be due to continued issues with supply chain and staffing shortages. Identifying differences attributable to the pandemic will help guide future decisions regarding BC care should conditions necessitate the reimplementation of strict infection-prevention measures. Identifying issues that continue post-COVID will help determine strategies to close those care gaps.